Abstract

The concept of susceptibility genes common to different autoimmune diseases is now firmly established with previous studies demonstrating overlap of loci conferring susceptibility to type 1 diabetes (T1D) with both Coeliac disease and multiple sclerosis. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an archetypal autoimmune disease and we, therefore, targeted putative T1D susceptibility loci for genotyping in UK RA cases and unrelated controls. A novel RA susceptibility locus at AFF3 was identified with convincing evidence for association in a combined sample cohort of 6819 RA cases and 12 650 controls [OR 1.12 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.07–1.17, P = 2.8 × 10−7]. Association of two previously described loci (CTLA-4 and 4q27) with RA was also replicated (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82–0.94, P = 1.1 × 10−4 and OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79–0.94, P = 5.4 × 10−4, respectively). These findings take the number of established RA susceptibility loci to 13, only one of which has not been associated with other autoimmune diseases.

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a disease in which uncontrolled inflammation of synovial joints may cause progressive joint damage and consequent long-term disability. It is a typical autoimmune disease, being characterized by the elaboration of auto-antibodies to immunoglobulins (rheumatoid factor) and cyclic citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP antibodies) and by genetic associations with the class II region of the major histocompatibility complex. Genome wide association (GWA) and subsequent validation studies have successfully identified a number of novel RA susceptibility loci but it is already clear that simply following up the top tiers of significantly associated markers from such studies is unlikely to identify all the relevant disease-associated loci (1–6). Clustering of autoimmune diseases, including type 1 diabetes (T1D) and RA, is apparent in families and it has already been established that RA and T1D share common susceptibility loci (7). For example, a non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the PTPN22 gene (PTPN22*R620W) has been associated with susceptibility to both diseases as has polymorphism at the interleukin 2 receptor alpha (IL2RA) locus (1,8). Given that T1D is an autoimmune disease for which a large number of susceptibility variants have already been identified, we sought to explore the hypothesis that putative T1D susceptibility genes/loci are also associated with RA.

RESULTS

T1D putative genetic susceptibility loci were selected for investigation from information available from a previous study (8), excluding markers mapping to the INS (not a strong candidate gene for RA), CLEC2D2 (associated by multi-locus imputation analysis only) and PTPN22 (RA data published previously) (2) genes (8,9). Eighteen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) mapping to 14 distinct loci were genotyped in 3962 UK RA cases and 3531 unrelated UK controls. A Bonferroni correction of 14 was applied to correct for the number of loci studied, resulting in a P-value threshold of 0.004 for claims of significance. The sample size had >80% power to identify association at this threshold assuming the same effect sizes as reported previously for T1D for most of the loci investigated (Supplementary Material, Table S1) (8,9).

Of the 18 SNPs tested, four variants mapping to three loci (AFF3, CTLA4 and IL2/21) showed evidence for association with RA (Table 1). These included two SNPs [rs10865035 OR 1.13 (1.06–1.21), P = 4.0 × 10−4 and rs1160542 OR 1.12 (1.05–1.20), P = 0.001] mapping to the AFF3 locus, which are highly correlated (r2 = 0.97) with each other. Conditional logistic regression analysis suggested that the primary effect is from rs10865035. A perfect proxy for this variant was genotyped as part of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) study (rs9653442) and also showed evidence for association in that cohort of 1860 RA cases and 2920 controls (trend P = 4.8 × 10−4) (1). For the rs10865035 SNP, data was available from an additional cohort of 997 RA cases, recruited as part of an inception cohort study of RA outcome and 6199 controls with published genotype frequencies available (8). In total, therefore, data was available for 6819 RA cases and 12 650 controls. Allele frequencies were similar across the three control cohorts with no evidence of heterogeneity (P = 0.39). Hence, a combined analysis across all samples was undertaken and confirmed strong evidence for association of this locus with RA susceptibility (OR 1.12 95% CI 1.07–1.17, P = 2.8 × 10−7).

Table 1.

T1D-associated SNPs tested for association with RA

MarkerChrLocus/GeneHWE controlMAF caseMAF controlGenotype frequency cases (%)
Genotype frequency controls (%)
Trend P-valueAllelic OR (95% CI)
rs11605422AFF30.320.470.45833 (22.4)1860 (49.9)1033 (27.7)574 (19.3)1493 (50.3)900 (30.3)0.0011.12 (1.05–1.20)
rs108650352AFF30.260.490.46882 (24.2)1786 (49.0)976 (26.8)596 (20.3)1488 (50.6)854 (29.1)4.0 × 10−41.13 (1.06–1.21)
rs19907602IFIH10.770.390.39594 (15.5)1803 (47.1)1427 (37.3)525 (15.3)1627 (47.3)1286 (37.4)0.8391.01 (0.94–1.08)
rs30872432CTLA40.740.420.46677 (18.5)1760 (48.0)1232 (33.5)634 (20.8)1523 (50.0)892 (29.2)1.1 × 10−40.87 (0.82–0.94)
rs173885684IL20.770.280.28308 (7.9)1530 (39.3)2057 (52.8)271 (7.8)1415 (40.6)1797 (51.6)0.460.97 (0.91–1.05)
rs68228444IL2_IL210.190.160.1895 (2.4)1052 (27.1)2739 (70.5)125 (3.6)1003 (29.0)2326 (67.4)5.4 × 10−40.86 (0.79–0.94)
rs68979325IL7R0.060.270.29270 (6.8)1573 (39.9)2100 (53.3)267 (7.6)1482 (42.3)1756 (50.1)0.0070.91 (0.84–0.97)
rs31940515IL7R0.450.270.26296 (7.5)1551 (39.4)2088 (53.1)239 (6.8)1318 (37.7)1942 (55.5)0.031.08 (1.00–1.17)
rs77221355CCNH0.190.220.22198 (5.5)1211 (33.4)2217 (61.1)146 (4.3)1185 (34.6)2094 (61.1)0.391.04 (0.96–1.12)
rs2139507CFTR0.190.410.40654 (16.6)1890 (48.0)1397 (35.4)570 (16.3)1639 (46.8)1294 (36.9)0.261.04 (0.97–1.11)
rs266623610NRP10.890.420.40673 (17.2)1921 (49.1)1316 (33.7)569 (16.3)1689 (48.3)1240 (35.4)0.091.06 (0.99–1.13)
rs229223912ERBB30.390.350.35518 (13.2)1692 (42.9)1730 (43.9)432 (12.4)1558 (44.7)1498 (42.9)0.901.00 (0.93–1.07)
rs1769673612C12ORF300.660.450.44825 (20.9)1899 (48.2)1217 (30.9)671 (19.2)1707 (48.8)1119 (32.0)0.081.06 (0.99–1.13)
rs1270871616KIAA03500.630.360.36507 (12.9)1791 (45.4)1643 (41.7)453 (12.9)1596 (45.6)1455 (41.5)0.881.00 (0.93–1.06)
rs254215118PTPN20.130.170.17123 (3.1)1133 (28.7)2696 (68.2)111 (3.2)954 (27.2)2442 (69.6)0.271.05 (0.96–1.14)
rs76336118CD2260.840.480.46942 (23.9)1902 (48.2)1100 (27.9)745 (21.2)1750 (49.9)1012 (28.9)0.031.08 (1.01–1.15)
rs601766720C20ORF1680.140.350.36474 (12.2)1799 (46.3)1615 (41.5)483 (13.9)1571 (45.2)1422 (40.9)0.140.95 (0.89–1.02)
rs38042120C20ORF1680.100.350.36469 (12.0)1821 (46.4)1631 (41.6)479 (13.8)1560 (44.9)1436 (41.3)0.190.96 (0.89–1.02)
MarkerChrLocus/GeneHWE controlMAF caseMAF controlGenotype frequency cases (%)
Genotype frequency controls (%)
Trend P-valueAllelic OR (95% CI)
rs11605422AFF30.320.470.45833 (22.4)1860 (49.9)1033 (27.7)574 (19.3)1493 (50.3)900 (30.3)0.0011.12 (1.05–1.20)
rs108650352AFF30.260.490.46882 (24.2)1786 (49.0)976 (26.8)596 (20.3)1488 (50.6)854 (29.1)4.0 × 10−41.13 (1.06–1.21)
rs19907602IFIH10.770.390.39594 (15.5)1803 (47.1)1427 (37.3)525 (15.3)1627 (47.3)1286 (37.4)0.8391.01 (0.94–1.08)
rs30872432CTLA40.740.420.46677 (18.5)1760 (48.0)1232 (33.5)634 (20.8)1523 (50.0)892 (29.2)1.1 × 10−40.87 (0.82–0.94)
rs173885684IL20.770.280.28308 (7.9)1530 (39.3)2057 (52.8)271 (7.8)1415 (40.6)1797 (51.6)0.460.97 (0.91–1.05)
rs68228444IL2_IL210.190.160.1895 (2.4)1052 (27.1)2739 (70.5)125 (3.6)1003 (29.0)2326 (67.4)5.4 × 10−40.86 (0.79–0.94)
rs68979325IL7R0.060.270.29270 (6.8)1573 (39.9)2100 (53.3)267 (7.6)1482 (42.3)1756 (50.1)0.0070.91 (0.84–0.97)
rs31940515IL7R0.450.270.26296 (7.5)1551 (39.4)2088 (53.1)239 (6.8)1318 (37.7)1942 (55.5)0.031.08 (1.00–1.17)
rs77221355CCNH0.190.220.22198 (5.5)1211 (33.4)2217 (61.1)146 (4.3)1185 (34.6)2094 (61.1)0.391.04 (0.96–1.12)
rs2139507CFTR0.190.410.40654 (16.6)1890 (48.0)1397 (35.4)570 (16.3)1639 (46.8)1294 (36.9)0.261.04 (0.97–1.11)
rs266623610NRP10.890.420.40673 (17.2)1921 (49.1)1316 (33.7)569 (16.3)1689 (48.3)1240 (35.4)0.091.06 (0.99–1.13)
rs229223912ERBB30.390.350.35518 (13.2)1692 (42.9)1730 (43.9)432 (12.4)1558 (44.7)1498 (42.9)0.901.00 (0.93–1.07)
rs1769673612C12ORF300.660.450.44825 (20.9)1899 (48.2)1217 (30.9)671 (19.2)1707 (48.8)1119 (32.0)0.081.06 (0.99–1.13)
rs1270871616KIAA03500.630.360.36507 (12.9)1791 (45.4)1643 (41.7)453 (12.9)1596 (45.6)1455 (41.5)0.881.00 (0.93–1.06)
rs254215118PTPN20.130.170.17123 (3.1)1133 (28.7)2696 (68.2)111 (3.2)954 (27.2)2442 (69.6)0.271.05 (0.96–1.14)
rs76336118CD2260.840.480.46942 (23.9)1902 (48.2)1100 (27.9)745 (21.2)1750 (49.9)1012 (28.9)0.031.08 (1.01–1.15)
rs601766720C20ORF1680.140.350.36474 (12.2)1799 (46.3)1615 (41.5)483 (13.9)1571 (45.2)1422 (40.9)0.140.95 (0.89–1.02)
rs38042120C20ORF1680.100.350.36469 (12.0)1821 (46.4)1631 (41.6)479 (13.8)1560 (44.9)1436 (41.3)0.190.96 (0.89–1.02)

The gene name refers to the nearest gene in the region although SNPs are not necessarily intra-genic.

Chr, chromosome; HWE, P-value statistic for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test; MAF, minor allele frequency; OR, odds ratio (95% confidence intervals).

Table 1.

T1D-associated SNPs tested for association with RA

MarkerChrLocus/GeneHWE controlMAF caseMAF controlGenotype frequency cases (%)
Genotype frequency controls (%)
Trend P-valueAllelic OR (95% CI)
rs11605422AFF30.320.470.45833 (22.4)1860 (49.9)1033 (27.7)574 (19.3)1493 (50.3)900 (30.3)0.0011.12 (1.05–1.20)
rs108650352AFF30.260.490.46882 (24.2)1786 (49.0)976 (26.8)596 (20.3)1488 (50.6)854 (29.1)4.0 × 10−41.13 (1.06–1.21)
rs19907602IFIH10.770.390.39594 (15.5)1803 (47.1)1427 (37.3)525 (15.3)1627 (47.3)1286 (37.4)0.8391.01 (0.94–1.08)
rs30872432CTLA40.740.420.46677 (18.5)1760 (48.0)1232 (33.5)634 (20.8)1523 (50.0)892 (29.2)1.1 × 10−40.87 (0.82–0.94)
rs173885684IL20.770.280.28308 (7.9)1530 (39.3)2057 (52.8)271 (7.8)1415 (40.6)1797 (51.6)0.460.97 (0.91–1.05)
rs68228444IL2_IL210.190.160.1895 (2.4)1052 (27.1)2739 (70.5)125 (3.6)1003 (29.0)2326 (67.4)5.4 × 10−40.86 (0.79–0.94)
rs68979325IL7R0.060.270.29270 (6.8)1573 (39.9)2100 (53.3)267 (7.6)1482 (42.3)1756 (50.1)0.0070.91 (0.84–0.97)
rs31940515IL7R0.450.270.26296 (7.5)1551 (39.4)2088 (53.1)239 (6.8)1318 (37.7)1942 (55.5)0.031.08 (1.00–1.17)
rs77221355CCNH0.190.220.22198 (5.5)1211 (33.4)2217 (61.1)146 (4.3)1185 (34.6)2094 (61.1)0.391.04 (0.96–1.12)
rs2139507CFTR0.190.410.40654 (16.6)1890 (48.0)1397 (35.4)570 (16.3)1639 (46.8)1294 (36.9)0.261.04 (0.97–1.11)
rs266623610NRP10.890.420.40673 (17.2)1921 (49.1)1316 (33.7)569 (16.3)1689 (48.3)1240 (35.4)0.091.06 (0.99–1.13)
rs229223912ERBB30.390.350.35518 (13.2)1692 (42.9)1730 (43.9)432 (12.4)1558 (44.7)1498 (42.9)0.901.00 (0.93–1.07)
rs1769673612C12ORF300.660.450.44825 (20.9)1899 (48.2)1217 (30.9)671 (19.2)1707 (48.8)1119 (32.0)0.081.06 (0.99–1.13)
rs1270871616KIAA03500.630.360.36507 (12.9)1791 (45.4)1643 (41.7)453 (12.9)1596 (45.6)1455 (41.5)0.881.00 (0.93–1.06)
rs254215118PTPN20.130.170.17123 (3.1)1133 (28.7)2696 (68.2)111 (3.2)954 (27.2)2442 (69.6)0.271.05 (0.96–1.14)
rs76336118CD2260.840.480.46942 (23.9)1902 (48.2)1100 (27.9)745 (21.2)1750 (49.9)1012 (28.9)0.031.08 (1.01–1.15)
rs601766720C20ORF1680.140.350.36474 (12.2)1799 (46.3)1615 (41.5)483 (13.9)1571 (45.2)1422 (40.9)0.140.95 (0.89–1.02)
rs38042120C20ORF1680.100.350.36469 (12.0)1821 (46.4)1631 (41.6)479 (13.8)1560 (44.9)1436 (41.3)0.190.96 (0.89–1.02)
MarkerChrLocus/GeneHWE controlMAF caseMAF controlGenotype frequency cases (%)
Genotype frequency controls (%)
Trend P-valueAllelic OR (95% CI)
rs11605422AFF30.320.470.45833 (22.4)1860 (49.9)1033 (27.7)574 (19.3)1493 (50.3)900 (30.3)0.0011.12 (1.05–1.20)
rs108650352AFF30.260.490.46882 (24.2)1786 (49.0)976 (26.8)596 (20.3)1488 (50.6)854 (29.1)4.0 × 10−41.13 (1.06–1.21)
rs19907602IFIH10.770.390.39594 (15.5)1803 (47.1)1427 (37.3)525 (15.3)1627 (47.3)1286 (37.4)0.8391.01 (0.94–1.08)
rs30872432CTLA40.740.420.46677 (18.5)1760 (48.0)1232 (33.5)634 (20.8)1523 (50.0)892 (29.2)1.1 × 10−40.87 (0.82–0.94)
rs173885684IL20.770.280.28308 (7.9)1530 (39.3)2057 (52.8)271 (7.8)1415 (40.6)1797 (51.6)0.460.97 (0.91–1.05)
rs68228444IL2_IL210.190.160.1895 (2.4)1052 (27.1)2739 (70.5)125 (3.6)1003 (29.0)2326 (67.4)5.4 × 10−40.86 (0.79–0.94)
rs68979325IL7R0.060.270.29270 (6.8)1573 (39.9)2100 (53.3)267 (7.6)1482 (42.3)1756 (50.1)0.0070.91 (0.84–0.97)
rs31940515IL7R0.450.270.26296 (7.5)1551 (39.4)2088 (53.1)239 (6.8)1318 (37.7)1942 (55.5)0.031.08 (1.00–1.17)
rs77221355CCNH0.190.220.22198 (5.5)1211 (33.4)2217 (61.1)146 (4.3)1185 (34.6)2094 (61.1)0.391.04 (0.96–1.12)
rs2139507CFTR0.190.410.40654 (16.6)1890 (48.0)1397 (35.4)570 (16.3)1639 (46.8)1294 (36.9)0.261.04 (0.97–1.11)
rs266623610NRP10.890.420.40673 (17.2)1921 (49.1)1316 (33.7)569 (16.3)1689 (48.3)1240 (35.4)0.091.06 (0.99–1.13)
rs229223912ERBB30.390.350.35518 (13.2)1692 (42.9)1730 (43.9)432 (12.4)1558 (44.7)1498 (42.9)0.901.00 (0.93–1.07)
rs1769673612C12ORF300.660.450.44825 (20.9)1899 (48.2)1217 (30.9)671 (19.2)1707 (48.8)1119 (32.0)0.081.06 (0.99–1.13)
rs1270871616KIAA03500.630.360.36507 (12.9)1791 (45.4)1643 (41.7)453 (12.9)1596 (45.6)1455 (41.5)0.881.00 (0.93–1.06)
rs254215118PTPN20.130.170.17123 (3.1)1133 (28.7)2696 (68.2)111 (3.2)954 (27.2)2442 (69.6)0.271.05 (0.96–1.14)
rs76336118CD2260.840.480.46942 (23.9)1902 (48.2)1100 (27.9)745 (21.2)1750 (49.9)1012 (28.9)0.031.08 (1.01–1.15)
rs601766720C20ORF1680.140.350.36474 (12.2)1799 (46.3)1615 (41.5)483 (13.9)1571 (45.2)1422 (40.9)0.140.95 (0.89–1.02)
rs38042120C20ORF1680.100.350.36469 (12.0)1821 (46.4)1631 (41.6)479 (13.8)1560 (44.9)1436 (41.3)0.190.96 (0.89–1.02)

The gene name refers to the nearest gene in the region although SNPs are not necessarily intra-genic.

Chr, chromosome; HWE, P-value statistic for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test; MAF, minor allele frequency; OR, odds ratio (95% confidence intervals).

A variant mapping to the CTLA-4 gene showed the strongest evidence for association with RA in the current cohort (rs3087243 OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82–0.94, P = 1.1 × 10−4). There have been previous reports of association of this variant with RA but findings have been inconsistent, probably reflecting the modest sample sizes used in many of the previous investigations (10,11). Combining the results from two previous well-powered studies with the current data, the SNP is confirmed as being associated with RA susceptibility [OR 0.88 (0.83–0.93), P = 2.6 × 10−6] (Fig. 1) (11).

Meta-analysis of current data for the rs3087243 SNP in the CTLA-4 gene with data from a previous study in two well-powered cohorts of RA patients and controls.
Figure 1.

Meta-analysis of current data for the rs3087243 SNP in the CTLA-4 gene with data from a previous study in two well-powered cohorts of RA patients and controls.

A SNP mapping within the IL2-IL21 locus on chromosome 4q27, previously reported to be associated with T1D, Coeliac disease and RA, was also associated with RA susceptibility in the current series (9). As reported previously, it was the common allele that predisposed to disease [rs6822844 OR 0.86, (0.79–0.94), P = 5.4 × 10−4].

The three loci show evidence for association with T1D and RA and are strong candidates for pan-autoimmunity susceptibility genes. If these loci predispose to autoimmunity in general, it might be expected that associations would be stronger in subsets of patients with auto-antibodies. However, following stratification by presence of auto-antibodies, the strength of associations was similar between auto-antibody positive and negative individuals at all three SNPs indicated by the overlapping confidence intervals (Table 2).

Table 2.

Results for SNPs with evidence for association with T1D and RA after stratifying by auto-antibody status in RA patients

SNPLocusControl genotype counts: n (%) 1/1 1/2 2/2
CCP neg+RF neg genotype counts: n (%) 1/1 1/2 2/2
OR (95% CI)aCCP pos +/or RF pos genotype counts: n (%) 1/1 1/2 2/2
OR (95% CI)a
rs10865035AFF3854 (29.1)1488 (50.6)596 (20.3)104 (27.6)177 (46.9)96 (25.5)1.14 (0.98–1.33)661 (24.1)1352 (49.3)728 (26.6)1.14 (1.06–1.22)
rs3087243CTLA4892 (29.2)1523 (50.0)634 (20.8)112 (29.8)195 (51.9)69 (18.4)0.94 (0.81–1.1)518 (35.4)1303 (45.9)938 (18.6)0.87 (0.81–0.94)
rs6822844IL2_212326 (67.3)1003 (29.0)125 (3.6)277 (72.1)97 (25.3)10 (2.6)0.81 (0.66–1.0)2061 (70.9)775 (26.7)71 (2.4)0.85 (0.77–0.93)
SNPLocusControl genotype counts: n (%) 1/1 1/2 2/2
CCP neg+RF neg genotype counts: n (%) 1/1 1/2 2/2
OR (95% CI)aCCP pos +/or RF pos genotype counts: n (%) 1/1 1/2 2/2
OR (95% CI)a
rs10865035AFF3854 (29.1)1488 (50.6)596 (20.3)104 (27.6)177 (46.9)96 (25.5)1.14 (0.98–1.33)661 (24.1)1352 (49.3)728 (26.6)1.14 (1.06–1.22)
rs3087243CTLA4892 (29.2)1523 (50.0)634 (20.8)112 (29.8)195 (51.9)69 (18.4)0.94 (0.81–1.1)518 (35.4)1303 (45.9)938 (18.6)0.87 (0.81–0.94)
rs6822844IL2_212326 (67.3)1003 (29.0)125 (3.6)277 (72.1)97 (25.3)10 (2.6)0.81 (0.66–1.0)2061 (70.9)775 (26.7)71 (2.4)0.85 (0.77–0.93)

RF, rheumatoid factor; CCP, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody; Pos, positive; Neg, negative.

Number of patients for whom auto-antibody data available: RF pos=2470; RF neg=934; Anti-CCP pos=1446; Anti-CCP neg=674; CCP neg+RF neg (auto-antibody negative)=400; CCP pos +/or RF pos (auto-antibody positive)=2958.

aOR (95% CI)=odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals.

Table 2.

Results for SNPs with evidence for association with T1D and RA after stratifying by auto-antibody status in RA patients

SNPLocusControl genotype counts: n (%) 1/1 1/2 2/2
CCP neg+RF neg genotype counts: n (%) 1/1 1/2 2/2
OR (95% CI)aCCP pos +/or RF pos genotype counts: n (%) 1/1 1/2 2/2
OR (95% CI)a
rs10865035AFF3854 (29.1)1488 (50.6)596 (20.3)104 (27.6)177 (46.9)96 (25.5)1.14 (0.98–1.33)661 (24.1)1352 (49.3)728 (26.6)1.14 (1.06–1.22)
rs3087243CTLA4892 (29.2)1523 (50.0)634 (20.8)112 (29.8)195 (51.9)69 (18.4)0.94 (0.81–1.1)518 (35.4)1303 (45.9)938 (18.6)0.87 (0.81–0.94)
rs6822844IL2_212326 (67.3)1003 (29.0)125 (3.6)277 (72.1)97 (25.3)10 (2.6)0.81 (0.66–1.0)2061 (70.9)775 (26.7)71 (2.4)0.85 (0.77–0.93)
SNPLocusControl genotype counts: n (%) 1/1 1/2 2/2
CCP neg+RF neg genotype counts: n (%) 1/1 1/2 2/2
OR (95% CI)aCCP pos +/or RF pos genotype counts: n (%) 1/1 1/2 2/2
OR (95% CI)a
rs10865035AFF3854 (29.1)1488 (50.6)596 (20.3)104 (27.6)177 (46.9)96 (25.5)1.14 (0.98–1.33)661 (24.1)1352 (49.3)728 (26.6)1.14 (1.06–1.22)
rs3087243CTLA4892 (29.2)1523 (50.0)634 (20.8)112 (29.8)195 (51.9)69 (18.4)0.94 (0.81–1.1)518 (35.4)1303 (45.9)938 (18.6)0.87 (0.81–0.94)
rs6822844IL2_212326 (67.3)1003 (29.0)125 (3.6)277 (72.1)97 (25.3)10 (2.6)0.81 (0.66–1.0)2061 (70.9)775 (26.7)71 (2.4)0.85 (0.77–0.93)

RF, rheumatoid factor; CCP, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody; Pos, positive; Neg, negative.

Number of patients for whom auto-antibody data available: RF pos=2470; RF neg=934; Anti-CCP pos=1446; Anti-CCP neg=674; CCP neg+RF neg (auto-antibody negative)=400; CCP pos +/or RF pos (auto-antibody positive)=2958.

aOR (95% CI)=odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals.

Finally, although the common allele of a non-synonymous SNP (rs6897932) mapping to the IL7R gene previously associated with both T1D and multiple sclerosis was somewhat over-represented in RA cases (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84–0.97; trend P = 0.007), this did not achieve statistical significance at the corrected P-value threshold (8,12,13).

DISCUSSION

The concept of pan-autoimmunity susceptibility genes is now firmly established with recent reports of overlap between T1D and Coeliac disease as well as T1D and multiple sclerosis (14,15). By targeting variants with suggestive evidence for association with T1D, we have identified a novel association of the AFF3 locus with RA susceptibility. In addition, association of two other loci, the CTLA4 and IL2-IL21 regions, has also been confirmed.

The association of variants in the AFF3 locus with susceptibility to RA has not previously been described. The variant was selected for genotyping because there was suggestive evidence for association with T1D in one large case–control series (P = 5.0 ×10−6), although this was not subsequently replicated in a smaller family-based study (8). However, we have found evidence for association of the variant in three independent case–control series including UK patients with RA and controls with combined analysis reaching a threshold that some regard as achieving genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10−7). The associated variants map to the 5′ and promoter region of the AFF3 gene, which is strongly conserved in evolution and is preferentially expressed in lymphoid cells (16). It encodes a nuclear factor that can interact with DNA and contains transcriptional activation domains, making it a strong candidate autoimmunity gene.

Our findings also support association of the CTLA4 gene with RA susceptibility. CTLA4 is a co-stimulatory receptor expressed on activated T cells which down-regulates the T cell response. The rs3087243 SNP maps within the 3′ region of the CTLA-4 gene and previous functional studies have identified a correlation between the ratio of soluble to full length CTLA4 mRNA levels with genotype at this variant (17). Interestingly, the fusion protein, Abatacept (Orencia), a biologic drug with proven efficacy in RA, is a CTLA-4 analogue, highlighting the fact that relatively modest genetic effects may identify targets for treatment which are highly effective in large numbers of patients (18).

A region on chromosome 4q27 also showed evidence for association with RA susceptibility in our UK series. The region exhibits substantial linkage disequilibrium encompassing both the IL2 and IL21 genes. Since both are good candidates as autoimmunity susceptibility genes, identifying the causal polymorphism to determine exactly how it predisposes to autoimmune diseases will be challenging.

It is interesting to note that the IL7R gene showed a trend towards association with RA. The rs6897932 SNP is located in exon 6 and is associated with increased exon skipping resulting in an alteration in the ratio of the membrane-bound to soluble receptor. The IL7 pathway is important in T cell growth and plays a role in regulating cytokine production and, interestingly, expression of IL7R has been correlated with disease activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with RA (19). However, association in other RA data sets is required before this locus can be confidently confirmed as an RA susceptibility gene.

In summary, by targeting loci with prior evidence for association with T1D, we have identified a novel association of AFF3 with RA susceptibility. We have also confirmed association of RA with two other loci (CTLA4 and IL2-21/4q27) so that a total of 13 loci have now been confirmed as associated with RA susceptibility (HLA DRB1, PTPN22, STAT4, TRAF1/C5, 6q23, IL2RB, 12q13, 10p15, CD40, MMEL1, AFF3, 4q27 and CTLA-4). Interestingly, for all but one of these loci (TRAF1/C5), association with other autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, Graves disease and coeliac disease, has been described, firmly establishing the concept of common susceptibility loci for autoimmunity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collections

Patients with RA (n = 3,962) were recruited from six centres (Manchester, Sheffield, Leeds, Aberdeen, Oxford and London) across the UK as described previously (2). All cases were Caucasian of Northern European descent and all fulfilled the 1987 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria modified for genetic studies (20,21). Clinical and demographic characteristics of the cohort are detailed in Supplementary Material, Table S2. Briefly, 72% subjects were female, 72% were rheumatoid factor positive and 68% carried ACPA antibodies as recognized by the anti-CCP antibody test. Therefore, this cohort is representative of a hospital-based series of RA subjects. Healthy Caucasian controls (n = 3531) were recruited from five of the six centres (cases only recruited from London). All participants were recruited after providing informed consent and the study was approved by the North West Research Ethics Committee (MREC 99/8/84). Additional patient samples (n = 997) from subjects satisfying ACR criteria for RA (20,21) were obtained from an inception cohort of patients with inflammatory polyarthritis recruited from the Norfolk Arthritis Register (NOAR). Sixty-eight percent of patients were female, 39% were RF positive at baseline and 52% had developed erosions by 5 years. Local Ethics approval was obtained and all patients provided informed consent (LREC 2003-075).

Immunogenetics

Serum RF and anti-CCP antibody titre were measured using commercially available kits [RF-PAIA Immunoturbidimetric Assay for rheumatoid factor, Diastat™ Anti-CCP Kit (Axis-Shield Diagnostics Limited, UK)]. Patients with titres ≥40 units/ml and ≥5 units/ml were defined as positive for RF and anti-CCP antibodies, respectively. Anti-CCP status was available only for a subset of the total validation case cohort (n = 2370).

Genotyping

Genotyping was performed using the Sequenom iPlex platform (www.sequenom.com) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All genotyping was performed at the arc Epidemiology Unit, Manchester. Details of the primer and probe sequences used for the SNPs are available on request. Only samples and SNPs exceeding a 90% success rate were used in the analysis.

Analysis

Genotype counts in cases and controls were analysed using PLINK software using the χ2 test for trend (22). A corrected significance threshold of P < 0.004 was selected based on a Bonferroni correction for 14 independent loci tested as part of this study. Power calculations were performed using the CaTS power calculator tool (http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/abecasis/cats/). Stratification analysis was performed by subgrouping the cases into anti-CCP antibody positive and negative subgroups for comparison with the controls. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine whether the association observed at the AFF3 locus was primarily due to linkage disequilibrium between the associated SNPs or whether independent effects existed. The possibility of population stratification was not examined because genome-wide data was only available for the WTCCC data set. However, in that cohort, no evidence for global population stratification in the UK population tested was identified (λGC = 1.03 for RA samples versus controls) and allele frequencies in the two other UK control cohorts examined as part of the current study did not differ from the control cohort tested as part of the WTCCC study (1).

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary Material is available at HMG online.

FUNDING

We thank the Arthritis Research Campaign for their support. arc grant reference no. 17552. We would also like to acknowledge the NHS Research and Development Support Fund for Guy’s and St Thomas’ and Lewisham NHS Trusts. We acknowledge the use of DNA from the British 1958 Birth Cohort collection, funded by the Medical Research Council grant G0000934 and the Wellcome Trust grant 068545/Z/02. Funding to pay the Open Access charge was provided by the Arthritis Research Campaign.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the YEAR consortium for allowing us access to their DNA collection. IT support was provided by Phil Steer and technical support by Paul Gilbert, Bhaneeta Lad and Stephen G Martin. Nursing support was provided by Janet Grumley, Julie Shotton and Claire Farrar. We acknowledge support from the EU FP6 programme AutoCure and the Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.

Conflict of Interest statement: None declared.

REFERENCES

1
Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium
,
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
Nature
,
2007
, vol.
447
(pg.
661
-
678
)
2
Thomson
W.
Barton
A.
Ke
X.
Eyre
S.
Hinks
A.
Bowes
J.
Donn
R.
Symmons
D.
Hider
S.
Bruce
I.N.
et al.
,
Rheumatoid arthritis association at 6q23
Nat. Genet.
,
2007
, vol.
39
(pg.
1431
-
1433
)
3
Plenge
R.M.
Seielstad
M.
Padyukov
L.
Lee
A.T.
Remmers
E.F.
Ding
B.
Liew
A.
Khalili
H.
Chandrasekaran
A.
Davies
L.R.
et al.
,
TRAF1-C5 as a risk locus for rheumatoid arthritis–a genomewide study
N. Engl. J. Med.
,
2007
, vol.
357
(pg.
1199
-
1209
)
4
Plenge
R.M.
Cotsapas
C.
Davies
L.
Price
A.L.
de Bakker
P.I.
Maller
J.
Pe’er
I.
Burtt
N.P.
Blumenstiel
B.
Defelice
M.
et al.
,
Two independent alleles at 6q23 associated with risk of rheumatoid arthritis
Nat. Genet.
,
2007
, vol.
39
(pg.
1477
-
1482
)
5
Raychaudhuri
S.
Remmers
E.F.
Lee
A.T.
Hackett
R.
Guiducci
C.
Burtt
N.P.
Gianniny
L.
Korman
B.D.
Padyukov
L.
Kurreeman
F.A.
et al.
,
Common variants at CD40 and other loci confer risk of rheumatoid arthritis
Nat. Genet.
,
2008
, vol.
40
(pg.
1216
-
1223
)
6
Barton
A.
Thomson
W.
Ke
X.
Eyre
S.
Hinks
A.
Bowes
J.
Plant
D.
Gibbons
L.J.
Wilson
A.G.
Bax
D.E.
et al.
,
Rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility loci at chromosomes 10p15, 12q13 and 22q13
Nat. Genet.
,
2008
, vol.
40
(pg.
1156
-
1159
)
7
Somers
E.C.
Thomas
S.L.
Smeeth
L.
Hall
A.J.
,
Autoimmune diseases co-occurring within individuals and within families: a systematic review
Epidemiology
,
2006
, vol.
17
(pg.
202
-
217
)
8
Todd
J.A.
Walker
N.M.
Cooper
J.D.
Smyth
D.J.
Downes
K.
Plagnol
V.
Bailey
R.
Nejentsev
S.
Field
S.F.
Payne
F.
et al.
,
Robust associations of four new chromosome regions from genome-wide analyses of type 1 diabetes
Nat. Genet.
,
2007
, vol.
39
(pg.
857
-
864
)
9
Zhernakova
A.
Alizadeh
B.Z.
Bevova
M.
van Leeuwen
M.A.
Coenen
M.J.
Franke
B.
Franke
L.
Posthumus
M.D.
van Heel
D.A.
van der
S.G.
et al.
,
Novel association in chromosome 4q27 region with rheumatoid arthritis and confirmation of type 1 diabetes point to a general risk locus for autoimmune diseases
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
,
2007
, vol.
81
(pg.
1284
-
1288
)
10
Barton
A.
Jury
F.
Eyre
S.
Bowes
J.
Hinks
A.
Ward
D.
Worthington
J.
,
Haplotype analysis in simplex families and novel analytic approaches in a case-control cohort reveal no evidence of association of the CTLA-4 gene with rheumatoid arthritis
Arthritis Rheum.
,
2004
, vol.
50
(pg.
748
-
752
)
11
Plenge
R.M.
Padyukov
L.
Remmers
E.F.
Purcell
S.
Lee
A.T.
Karlson
E.W.
Wolfe
F.
Kastner
D.L.
Alfredsson
L.
Altshuler
D.
et al.
,
Replication of putative candidate-gene associations with rheumatoid arthritis in >4,000 samples from North America and Sweden: association of susceptibility with PTPN22, CTLA4 and PADI4
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
,
2005
, vol.
77
(pg.
1044
-
1060
)
12
Lundmark
F.
Duvefelt
K.
Iacobaeus
E.
Kockum
I.
Wallstrom
E.
Khademi
M.
Oturai
A.
Ryder
L.P.
Saarela
J.
Harbo
H.F.
et al.
,
Variation in interleukin 7 receptor alpha chain (IL7R) influences risk of multiple sclerosis
Nat. Genet.
,
2007
, vol.
39
(pg.
1108
-
1113
)
13
Gregory
S.G.
Schmidt
S.
Seth
P.
Oksenberg
J.R.
Hart
J.
Prokop
A.
Caillier
S.J.
Ban
M.
Goris
A.
Barcellos
L.F.
et al.
,
Interleukin 7 receptor alpha chain (IL7R) shows allelic and functional association with multiple sclerosis
Nat. Genet.
,
2007
, vol.
39
(pg.
1083
-
1091
)
14
Smyth
D.J.
Plagnol
V.
Walker
N.M.
Cooper
J.D.
Downes
K.
Yang
J.H.
Howson
J.M.
Stevens
H.
McManus
R.
Wijmenga
C.
et al.
,
Shared and distinct genetic variants in type 1 diabetes and celiac disease
N. Engl. J. Med.
,
2008
, vol.
359
(pg.
2767
-
2777
)
15
International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium
,
The expanding genetic overlap between multiple sclerosis and type I diabetes
Genes Immun.
,
2009
, vol.
10
(pg.
11
-
14
)
16
Ma
C.
Staudt
L.M.
,
LAF-4 encodes a lymphoid nuclear protein with transactivation potential that is homologous to AF-4, the gene fused to MLL in t(4;11) leukemias
Blood
,
1996
, vol.
87
(pg.
734
-
745
)
17
Ueda
H.
Howson
J.M.
Esposito
L.
Heward
J.
Snook
H.
Chamberlain
G.
Rainbow
D.B.
Hunter
K.M.
Smith
A.N.
Di Genova
G.
et al.
,
Association of the T-cell regulatory gene CTLA4 with susceptibility to autoimmune disease
Nature
,
2003
, vol.
423
(pg.
506
-
511
)
18
Kremer
J.M.
Genant
H.K.
Moreland
L.W.
Russell
A.S.
Emery
P.
Bud-Mendoza
C.
Szechinski
J.
Li
T.
Teng
J.
Becker
J.C.
Westhovens
R.
,
Results of a two-year followup study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who received a combination of abatacept and methotrexate
Arthritis Rheum.
,
2008
, vol.
58
(pg.
953
-
963
)
19
Parker
A.
Izmailova
E.S.
Narang
J.
Badola
S.
Le
T.
Roubenoff
R.
Ginsburg
G.S.
Maier
A.
Coblyn
J.S.
Shadick
N.A.
Weinblatt
M.E.
,
Peripheral blood expression of nuclear factor-kappab-regulated genes is associated with rheumatoid arthritis disease activity and responds differentially to anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha versus methotrexate
J. Rheumatol.
,
2007
, vol.
34
(pg.
1817
-
1822
)
20
Arnett
F.C.
Edworthy
S.M.
Bloch
D.A.
McShane
D.J.
Fries
J.F.
Cooper
N.S.
Healey
L.A.
Kaplan
S.R.
Liang
M.H.
Luthra
H.S.
,
The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis
Arthritis Rheum.
,
1988
, vol.
31
(pg.
315
-
324
)
21
MacGregor
A.J.
Bamder
S.
Silman
A.J.
,
A comparison of the performance of different methods of disease classification for rheumatoid arthritis. Results from an analysis from a nationwide twin study
J. Rheumatol.
,
1994
, vol.
21
(pg.
1420
-
1426
)
22
Purcell
S.
Neale
B.
Todd-Brown
K.
Thomas
L.
Ferreira
M.A.
Bender
D.
Maller
J.
Sklar
P.
de Bakker
P.I.
Daly
M.J.
Sham
P.C.
,
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
,
2007
, vol.
81
(pg.
559
-
575
)

Author notes

These two authors contributed equally to the work.

Supplementary note online.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Supplementary data