-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Anne Kammel, Sophie Saussenthaler, Markus Jähnert, Wenke Jonas, Laura Stirm, Andreas Hoeflich, Harald Staiger, Andreas Fritsche, Hans-Ulrich Häring, Hans-Georg Joost, Annette Schürmann, Robert W. Schwenk, Early hypermethylation of hepatic Igfbp2 results in its reduced expression preceding fatty liver in mice, Human Molecular Genetics, Volume 25, Issue 12, 15 June 2016, Pages 2588–2599, https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddw121
- Share Icon Share
Obesity and ectopic fat disposition are risk factors for metabolic disease. Recent data indicate that IGFBP2 expression in liver is epigenetically inhibited during hepatic steatosis. The aim of this study was to investigate if epigenetic de-regulation of hepatic Igfbp2 occurs already early in life and is associated with increased risk for diet-induced obesity (DIO) during adolescence. Male C57BL/6J mice received a high-fat diet. After 3 weeks on this diet (age of 6 weeks), DIO-susceptible (responder, Resp) and DIO-resistant (non-responder, nResp) mice were identified by early weight gain. At the age of 6 weeks, Resp mice exhibited elevated blood glucose (p < 0.05), plasma insulin (p < 0.01), HOMA-IR and leptin/adiponectin ratio, whereas liver triglycerides were identical but significantly increased (p < 0.01) in Resp mice at 20 weeks of age. Igfbp2 expression was reduced in young Resp compared with nResp mice (p < 0.01), an effect that correlated with elevated DNA methylation of intronic CpG2605 (p < 0.01). The epigenetic inhibition of Igfbp2 was stable over time and preceded DIO and hepatosteatosis in adult mice. In vitro studies demonstrated that selective methylation of CpG2605 significantly reduced reporter activity by ∼85%, indicating that Igfbp2 expression is modulated by methylation. In human whole blood cells, methylation of IGFBP2 at the homologous CpG site was increased in obese men with impaired glucose tolerance. In conclusion, our data show that increased methylation of hepatic Igfbp2 during infancy predicts the development of fatty liver later in life and is linked to deterioration of glucose metabolism.
Introduction
Obesity has become a major health threat, affecting more than half a billion people worldwide in 2014 (1). In particular, obesity increases the risk for insulin resistance, hypertension, coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes (T2D). The risk of obesity is largely influenced by the family background, indicated by heritability rates of up to 40% for body mass index (BMI) (2). However, genetic variants identified so far only explain <5% of the observed heritability, a phenomenon referred to as “missing heritability” (3,4).
Epigenetics is suggested to explain parts of the missing heritability. Epigenetic alterations (e.g. DNA methylation at CpG dinucleotides or histone modifications) modify gene expression without altering genomic sequences and are therefore missed in conventional genome-wide association studies (5,6). Intriguingly, even in inbred mouse strains like C57BL/6J, individual mice largely differ in their response to diet-induced obesity (DIO), rendering these strains a suitable model to unravel non-genetic mechanisms in body weight regulation (7). In this context, Koza et al. (7) identified three genes (Sfrp5, Mest and Bmp3) in adipose tissue, which are differentially expressed in DIO-responders already at 7 weeks of age and associated with increased susceptibility to DIO.
In addition to adipose tissue, the liver plays a major role in the regulation of energy metabolism and hepatic insulin sensitivity, and consequently in the pathogenesis of obesity and T2D (8,9). Accordingly, hepatic genes involved in glucose and lipid metabolism have been shown to be altered in mice prone to DIO, including insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) (10). The IGF-axis appears to play a crucial role in the regulation of body weight early in life. IGF-2 is involved in embryonic growth, and altered methylation of the human IGF2 gene is associated with childhood obesity (11–13). This is of particular interest, since plasma IGFBP-2 levels have been found to be decreased in obese males and females (14,15). Furthermore, reduced circulating IGFBP-2 levels in obese subjects are associated with increased bioavailability of IGF-1, and hyperinsulinemia (14). Furthermore, Igfbp2 transgenic mice show reduced body weight gain on a standard diet and are protected against the development of a DIO and insulin resistance (16,17). Recently, Ahrens et al. (18) reported that hepatic expression of IGFBP2, a modulator of IGF-1/2 bioavailability, is epigenetically inhibited in patients with different grades of hepatic lipid accumulation.
In this study, we investigated whether the variance in DIO and hepatic steatosis of genetically identical C57BL/6J mice is reflected by epigenetic modulation of hepatic Igfbp2 early in life. The establishment of weight prediction parameters allowed us to isolate liver tissues before the onset of fatty liver, and to study differences between mice prone to DIO and mice resistant against it. We found Igfbp2 to be hypermethylated and transcriptionally repressed in young mice prone to DIO, already before the onset of hepatic steatosis. These transcriptional and epigenetic differences of Igfbp2 that are present early in life and linked to obesity and insulin resistance in adolescence underline the significance of IGFBP-2 for body weight development and fatty liver. Interestingly, differential methylation occurs at the CpG site homologous to the human site in the IGFBP2 gene published by Ahrens et al. (18). In whole blood cells of human subjects exhibiting an impaired glucose tolerance the IGFBP2 methylation was significantly increased.
Results
Prediction of DIO by early weight parameters

Impaired insulin sensitivity precedes liver fat accumulation. (A) Body weight development of DIO-responders (Resp, n = 9) and DIO-non-responders (nResp, n = 11) upon identification in week 6. Mice receiving an LFD served as control group. Body composition (B), fasted blood glucose (C), plasma insulin (D) and leptin (E) levels. (F) HOMA-IR calculated from fasted blood glucose and insulin levels. (G) LAR. (H) Liver triglyceride levels. All data represented as mean ± SEM of n = 10–15 animals per group. Differences between DIO-responder (Resp, black circle) and DIO-non-responder (nResp, white circle) mice were calculated by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
. | Week 6 . | Week 20 . | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nResp . | Resp . | p-value . | nResp . | Resp . | p-value . | |||||
Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | |||
Body weight (g) | 21.3 | 0.2 | 24.9 | 0.3 | <0.001 | 33.4 | 0.6 | 45.7 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Lean mass (g) | 17.1 | 0.2 | 19.1 | 0.3 | <0.001 | 24.1 | 0.3 | 30.4 | 0.5 | <0.001 |
Fat mass (g) | 4.8 | 0.1 | 6.2 | 0.3 | <0.01 | 10.8 | 0.7 | 19.8 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Body length (cm) | 9.0 | 0.1 | 9.5 | 0.2 | 0.071 | 10.3 | 0.1 | 10.8 | 0.1 | 0.008 |
Week 10 | ||||||||||
Food intake (g/day/g BW) | 0.087 | 0.002 | 0.082 | 0.004 | 0.205 | |||||
Water intake (g/day/g BW) | 0.098 | 0.006 | 0.090 | 0.006 | 0.354 |
. | Week 6 . | Week 20 . | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nResp . | Resp . | p-value . | nResp . | Resp . | p-value . | |||||
Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | |||
Body weight (g) | 21.3 | 0.2 | 24.9 | 0.3 | <0.001 | 33.4 | 0.6 | 45.7 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Lean mass (g) | 17.1 | 0.2 | 19.1 | 0.3 | <0.001 | 24.1 | 0.3 | 30.4 | 0.5 | <0.001 |
Fat mass (g) | 4.8 | 0.1 | 6.2 | 0.3 | <0.01 | 10.8 | 0.7 | 19.8 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Body length (cm) | 9.0 | 0.1 | 9.5 | 0.2 | 0.071 | 10.3 | 0.1 | 10.8 | 0.1 | 0.008 |
Week 10 | ||||||||||
Food intake (g/day/g BW) | 0.087 | 0.002 | 0.082 | 0.004 | 0.205 | |||||
Water intake (g/day/g BW) | 0.098 | 0.006 | 0.090 | 0.006 | 0.354 |
. | Week 6 . | Week 20 . | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nResp . | Resp . | p-value . | nResp . | Resp . | p-value . | |||||
Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | |||
Body weight (g) | 21.3 | 0.2 | 24.9 | 0.3 | <0.001 | 33.4 | 0.6 | 45.7 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Lean mass (g) | 17.1 | 0.2 | 19.1 | 0.3 | <0.001 | 24.1 | 0.3 | 30.4 | 0.5 | <0.001 |
Fat mass (g) | 4.8 | 0.1 | 6.2 | 0.3 | <0.01 | 10.8 | 0.7 | 19.8 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Body length (cm) | 9.0 | 0.1 | 9.5 | 0.2 | 0.071 | 10.3 | 0.1 | 10.8 | 0.1 | 0.008 |
Week 10 | ||||||||||
Food intake (g/day/g BW) | 0.087 | 0.002 | 0.082 | 0.004 | 0.205 | |||||
Water intake (g/day/g BW) | 0.098 | 0.006 | 0.090 | 0.006 | 0.354 |
. | Week 6 . | Week 20 . | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nResp . | Resp . | p-value . | nResp . | Resp . | p-value . | |||||
Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | |||
Body weight (g) | 21.3 | 0.2 | 24.9 | 0.3 | <0.001 | 33.4 | 0.6 | 45.7 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Lean mass (g) | 17.1 | 0.2 | 19.1 | 0.3 | <0.001 | 24.1 | 0.3 | 30.4 | 0.5 | <0.001 |
Fat mass (g) | 4.8 | 0.1 | 6.2 | 0.3 | <0.01 | 10.8 | 0.7 | 19.8 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Body length (cm) | 9.0 | 0.1 | 9.5 | 0.2 | 0.071 | 10.3 | 0.1 | 10.8 | 0.1 | 0.008 |
Week 10 | ||||||||||
Food intake (g/day/g BW) | 0.087 | 0.002 | 0.082 | 0.004 | 0.205 | |||||
Water intake (g/day/g BW) | 0.098 | 0.006 | 0.090 | 0.006 | 0.354 |
Impaired glucose homeostasis precedes the onset of hepatosteatosis
Next, we investigated whether differences in body weight gain were associated with changes in blood glucose, insulin or leptin levels. Surprisingly, blood glucose levels in Resp mice were elevated compared with nResp mice already at 6 weeks of age (8.5 ± 0.5 versus 6.8 ± 0.4 mm, p < 0.05) (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, plasma insulin (0.88 ± 0.10 versus 0.44 ± 0.06 µg/l, p < 0.01) and leptin (0.54 ± 0.08 versus 1.62 ± 0.31 ng/ml, p < 0.01) levels were also increased in Resp mice at this early time point (Fig. 1D and E). The differences of these blood parameters were stable and further increased over time (Fig. 1C–E). Accordingly, HOMA-IR indicated that Resp mice already at 6 weeks of age were less insulin sensitive compared with nResp mice (8.3 ± 1.1 versus 3.4 ± 0.6, p < 0.001) (Fig. 1F). The leptin per adiponectin ratio (LAR) is a second measure of systemic insulin resistance (19) and showed the same differences between Resp and nResp mice (Fig. 1G). Therefore, the impaired insulin sensitivity observed at the age of 20 weeks in Resp mice (Fig. 1F and G) was already manifested at 6 weeks of age and preceded the obese phenotype. Importantly, liver triglyceride levels were not different at 6 weeks of age but increased in Resp mice at 20 weeks of age (0.82 ± 0.08 versus 1.21 ± 0.07 µg/µgprotein) (Fig. 1H). Absolute liver weight was not different between Resp and nResp mice at 6 (42.2 ± 1.3 versus 39.3 ± 1.2 mg/gbody weight) and 20 (33.3 ± 1.1 versus 31.8 ± 0.9 mg/gbody weight) weeks of age, respectively.
Reduced Igfbp2 expression in young DIO responders

Modulation of the IGF axis. Hepatic Igfbp2 expression in 6 (A) and 20 (B) weeks old mice and the corresponding protein levels (C). Plasma IGFBP-2 (D) and IGFBP-3 (E) levels of the same animals determined by quantitative western ligand blot against IGF-2. (F) Plasma IGF-1 levels. All data represented as mean ± SEM of n = 8–12 animals per group. Differences between DIO-responder (Resp, black circle) and DIO-non-responder (nResp, white circle) mice were calculated by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Increased Igfbp2 methylation detected early in life of Resp mice

Differential methylation of hepatic Igfbp2 at CpG2605. (A) Genomic localization of cg11669516 in the human IGFBP2 gene (region −500 bp and +3500 bp relative to the transcriptional start site). Methylation of the mouse homologue CpG2605 in week 6 (B) and in week 20 (E), respectively. Correlation of Igfbp2 expression and CpG2605 methylation at 6 (C) and 20 (F) weeks of age. Correlation of CpG2605 methylation and body weight at 6 (D) and 20 (G) weeks of age. All data represented as mean ± SEM of n = 10–14 animals per group. Differences between Resp (black circle) and nResp (white circle) mice were calculated by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. R2 = Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
CpG2605 methylation modulates expression of the Igfbp2 gene

pCpGL–Igfbp2 luciferase reporter assays. (A) Intragenic region of murine Igfbp2 gene spanning from 2320 to 2997 bp relative to TSS. Recognition sites for methyltransferases HpaII and M.SssI, CpG2605 depicted in grey. (B) Luciferase activity upon selective methylation of pCpGL-Igfbp2. Igfbp2 expression (C) and CpG2605 methylation (D) in NZO mice. Correlation of CpG2605 methylation and body weight (E), insulin concentrations (F) and LAR (G) of 6 weeks old HFD-fed C57BL/6J and NZO mice. All data represented as mean ± SEM of n = 3–4 independent experiments and n = 7 animals per group, respectively. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 compared with untreated control group.
. | C57BL/6J (n = 7) . | NZO (n = 7) . | p-value . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | ||
Body weight (g) | 22.9 | 0.69 | 33.7 | 0.93 | <0.001 |
Lean mass (g) | 20.5 | 0.57 | 27.2 | 0.46 | <0.001 |
Fat mass (g) | 1.2 | 0.14 | 6.3 | 0.24 | <0.001 |
Fasted BG (mm) | 6.3 | 0.21 | 7.5 | 0.78 | 0.175 |
Fasted insulin (µg/L) | 0.7 | 0.08 | 2.9 | 0.45 | <0.001 |
HOMA-IR (AU) | 5.2 | 0.62 | 24.5 | 4.46 | 0.001 |
Leptin (ng/ml) | 1.1 | 0.23 | 16.67 | 1.24 | <0.001 |
Adiponectin (ng/ml) | 6131 | 430 | 6227 | 458 | 0.881 |
LAR (pg/ng) | 0.157 | 0.028 | 2.800 | 0.328 | <0.001 |
. | C57BL/6J (n = 7) . | NZO (n = 7) . | p-value . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | ||
Body weight (g) | 22.9 | 0.69 | 33.7 | 0.93 | <0.001 |
Lean mass (g) | 20.5 | 0.57 | 27.2 | 0.46 | <0.001 |
Fat mass (g) | 1.2 | 0.14 | 6.3 | 0.24 | <0.001 |
Fasted BG (mm) | 6.3 | 0.21 | 7.5 | 0.78 | 0.175 |
Fasted insulin (µg/L) | 0.7 | 0.08 | 2.9 | 0.45 | <0.001 |
HOMA-IR (AU) | 5.2 | 0.62 | 24.5 | 4.46 | 0.001 |
Leptin (ng/ml) | 1.1 | 0.23 | 16.67 | 1.24 | <0.001 |
Adiponectin (ng/ml) | 6131 | 430 | 6227 | 458 | 0.881 |
LAR (pg/ng) | 0.157 | 0.028 | 2.800 | 0.328 | <0.001 |
. | C57BL/6J (n = 7) . | NZO (n = 7) . | p-value . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | ||
Body weight (g) | 22.9 | 0.69 | 33.7 | 0.93 | <0.001 |
Lean mass (g) | 20.5 | 0.57 | 27.2 | 0.46 | <0.001 |
Fat mass (g) | 1.2 | 0.14 | 6.3 | 0.24 | <0.001 |
Fasted BG (mm) | 6.3 | 0.21 | 7.5 | 0.78 | 0.175 |
Fasted insulin (µg/L) | 0.7 | 0.08 | 2.9 | 0.45 | <0.001 |
HOMA-IR (AU) | 5.2 | 0.62 | 24.5 | 4.46 | 0.001 |
Leptin (ng/ml) | 1.1 | 0.23 | 16.67 | 1.24 | <0.001 |
Adiponectin (ng/ml) | 6131 | 430 | 6227 | 458 | 0.881 |
LAR (pg/ng) | 0.157 | 0.028 | 2.800 | 0.328 | <0.001 |
. | C57BL/6J (n = 7) . | NZO (n = 7) . | p-value . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | ||
Body weight (g) | 22.9 | 0.69 | 33.7 | 0.93 | <0.001 |
Lean mass (g) | 20.5 | 0.57 | 27.2 | 0.46 | <0.001 |
Fat mass (g) | 1.2 | 0.14 | 6.3 | 0.24 | <0.001 |
Fasted BG (mm) | 6.3 | 0.21 | 7.5 | 0.78 | 0.175 |
Fasted insulin (µg/L) | 0.7 | 0.08 | 2.9 | 0.45 | <0.001 |
HOMA-IR (AU) | 5.2 | 0.62 | 24.5 | 4.46 | 0.001 |
Leptin (ng/ml) | 1.1 | 0.23 | 16.67 | 1.24 | <0.001 |
Adiponectin (ng/ml) | 6131 | 430 | 6227 | 458 | 0.881 |
LAR (pg/ng) | 0.157 | 0.028 | 2.800 | 0.328 | <0.001 |
Plasticity of Igfbp2 methylation

Igfbp2 expression and methylation during weight loss and regain. (A) Body weight development of mice fed an HFD for 20 weeks (HFD) which were then caloric restricted for 3 weeks (HFD–CR) and again fed an HFD for 3 weeks (HFD–CR–HFD). (B) Modulation of lean mass (LM) and fat mass (FM) during weight cycling. Hepatic Igfbp2 expression (C) and methylation of CpG2605 (D) during weight cycling. Blood glucose (E) and plasma insulin concentrations (F) of the indicated groups. All data represented as mean ± SEM (n = 10 animals per group). Differences between HFD, HFD–CR and HFD–CR–HFD mice were calculated by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. R2 = Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Increased methylation of human CpG2965 in whole blood cells of obese and glucose intolerant men

Methylation of CpG2965 in human whole blood cells. (A) DNA methylation of CpG2965 in whole blood cells from human subjects classified into normal glucose tolerant with BMI <27 (NGT.BMI <27) or BMI >30 (NGT.BMI >30) or impaired glucose tolerant with BMI <27 (IGT.BMI <27) or BMI >30 (IGT.BMI >30). Correlation of CpG2965 methylation and fasted blood glucose (B). All data represented as mean ± SEM. Differences between groups were calculated by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05. R2 = Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Discussion
In this study, we investigated early inter-individual differences in the epigenetic regulation of hepatic Igfbp2 that determine DIO susceptibility in inbred C57BL/6J mice. Already at a very young age hepatic Igfbp2 expression was decreased and methylation at CpG2605 was increased in DIO responders. This epigenetic repression of hepatic Igfbp2 was stable over time and, most importantly, preceded the development of fatty liver. Selective in vitro methylation of CpG2605 decreased luciferase reporter activity, indicating a direct influence of methylation at this site on Igfbp2 expression levels. Transcriptional regulation of Igfbp2 largely followed body weight dynamics, as caloric restriction and HFD feeding conversely affected Igfbp2 expression and methylation. Furthermore, methylation of Igfbp2 was associated with blood glucose, a finding that was confirmed in human whole blood cells of obese men. In young individuals, enhanced Igfbp2 methylation reflects early deteriorations of glucose metabolism, which in turn represents an enhanced risk for fatty liver and insulin resistance later in life.
Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) are tightly regulated to ensure proper body weight development and growth in the neonatal period (26,27). IGF-1 binding proteins (IGFBPs) control the bioavailability of circulating IGF-1 (28). For example, the repression of IGFBP1 and IGFBP2 during chronic hyperinsulinemia increases the bioavailability of IGF-1 (free IGF-1) and supports body weight gain (14,29). Our present finding of reduced hepatic Igfbp2 expression in mice with elevated plasma insulin levels is in line with these published observations. Recently, we presented data of mouse lines selected for either high or low body weight gain for 58 generations (20). We showed that the sub-population of high body weight gainers exhibited a reduced hepatic Igfbp2 expression (20), similar to the data presented here. Importantly, the differential Igfbp2 expression and methylation reported in this study occurred in a single generation of mice, and differences were observed even between littermates.
We could show that repression of Igfbp2 in livers of obesity-prone mice is linked with increased methylation of CpG2605 in the first intron of the gene, already at a very young age. However, whether increased CpG2605 methylation is a result of elevated plasma insulin and glucose levels or independently established during development could not be resolved by our experiments. Nevertheless, our data indicate that epigenetic alterations of Igfbp2 occur early in life and precede the development of fatty liver.
In line with our observation, low plasma IGFBP-2 levels have also been found in obese children (30,31). Increased IGF-1 bioavailability at least partially explains the accelerated growth observed in children when reaching the pre-pubertal period (30). At this age, decreased IGFBP-2 serum levels were associated with increased body weight, body fat mass, serum insulin and leptin levels (32,33). Again, the phenotypic characteristics of our obesity-prone mice are in line with the observations in young humans. In addition, our study in inbred mice indicates that epigenetic variability early in life might contribute to the observed differences in circulating IGFBP-2 levels. In contrast to IGFBP-2, IGFBP-3 levels were increased in young mice prone to weight gain. In humans, serum levels of IGFBP-3 are decreased in children born small for gestational age, and tend to be increased in obese children (34,35). Furthermore, mice transgenic for Igfbp3 display increased serum levels of both IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 as well as impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance (36). Therefore, the increased IGFBP-3 levels found in young Resp mice might also contribute to the metabolic phenotype.
There are several possible mediators of Igfbp2 methylation and expression in obesity-prone individuals. Besides glucose, we found circulating insulin and leptin to be increased in obesity-prone mice compared with obesity-resistant mice. As mentioned above, insulin is a potent inhibitor of Igfbp2 expression (37,38). Therefore, it can be speculated that low insulin concentration in obesity-resistant mice may cause an increase in Igfbp2 expression. In contrast to insulin, leptin increases Igfbp2 expression in a dose-dependent manner (39). In DIO, however, Igfbp2 expression is rather low despite high levels of circulating leptin (39). This could be a result of the concomitant hyperinsulinemia or of the leptin resistance. The correlation of CpG2605 methylation and plasma leptin levels in our young animals might therefore reflect early metabolic disturbances induced by the HFD (39). .As overnutrition is known to suppress Igfbp2 expression (14) it is possible that the observed alterations in Igfbp2 mRNA levels and DNA methylation are just an epiphenomenon of elevated dietary intake. However, as food intake that was measured in week 10 on the individual basis was not different between responder and non-responder mice, we believe that alterations in Igfbp2 expression and methylation are rather a consequence of intrauterine and/or early postnatal programming.
As mentioned earlier, lifestyle interventions that improve insulin sensitivity and liver fat content, e.g. caloric restriction and exercise, have been shown to increase IGFBP2 expression (24,25). Caloric restriction also resulted in increased expression of hepatic Igfbp2 in our obese mice. De-methylation of CpG2605 under these conditions is apparently slower and did not reach statistical significance in our experiment. However, induction of CpG2605 methylation by re-feeding the HFD significantly increased methylation again. Together, these data indicate that long-term caloric intake can alter the methylation of CpG2605. The differential Igfbp2 expression as well as methylation associated with changes in body weight before the onset of liver fat accumulation might already play an important role during fetal programming. Human studies found an association of high IGFBP-2 cord serum concentrations with inter-uterine growth retardation in newborns (40), indicating an effect of IGFBP-2 on fetal growth.
In conclusion, our data suggest that increased methylation of hepatic Igfbp2 during infancy indicates an increased risk to develop obesity and ectopic fat accumulation in adolescence. Furthermore, our data suggest that early deteriorations of glucose metabolism parallels epigenetic deregulation of Igfbp2.
Materials and Methods
Animals
C57BL/6J breeding pairs (Charles River, Germany) received a standard chow (ssniff) and were housed in temperature-controlled room (22 + 1°C) on a 12:12 h light dark cycle. After weaning male mice were fed an HFD (60 kcal% fat, 21.9 kJ/g, D12492, Research Diets, Inc., USA) ad libitum in groups of two to six animals per cage. The mice were housed and handled in accordance with the ‘Principles of laboratory animal care’ (41). The animal welfare committees of the DIfE as well as the local authorities (LUGV, Brandenburg, Germany) approved all animal experiments. Weekly body weight measurements were performed in the morning (8–10 am) from 3 to 20 weeks of age. Body composition was analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR, Minispec LF50, Bruker Biospin). Blood glucose was measured from tail blood with a Glucometer Elite (Bayer, Germany). At 10 weeks of age, food intake was monitored with an automatic drinking and feeding monitor system (TSE Systems, Germany). Mice were housed in individual cages and adapted to food baskets connected to weight sensors for 2 days. During the measurement period of 3 days, the baskets contained HFD pellets to which mice had ad libitum access. At the age of 6 and 20 weeks, respectively, mice were killed after 6 h fasting. All tissues were directly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until further processing.
Plasma analysis
Plasma insulin was measured using the Mouse Ultra-sensitive insulin ELISA kit from ALPCO (USA). Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP-2) as well as insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) plasma levels were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays from R&D Systems (mouse-IGFBP-2, DY797; mouse IGF-1, DY791; R&D Systems, USA). The assays were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions.
Hepatic triglycerides
Liver triglycerides were quantified using a commercial kit (RandoxTR-210, UK). Livers were homogenized in 10 mmol/l sodium dihydrogen phosphate, 1 mmol/l EDTA and 1% (vol./vol.) polyoxyethylene-10-tridecyl ether and incubated for 5 min at 37°C. After centrifugation, the triacylglycerols in the supernatant fraction could be detected.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)
Total RNA from liver tissue of mice was extracted, and cDNA synthesis as well as TaqMan gene expression assays were performed as described previously (42).
Quantitative western ligand blot analysis of IGFBP
Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins were analyzed in plasma by quantitative western ligand blot analysis, as described previously (43,44). Plasma as well as recombinant human IGFBP standards (R&D Systems, USA) were diluted 1:20 in artificial serum matrix (Biopanda) and boiled in sample buffer (312.5 mm Tris (pH 6.8), 50% (wt/vol) glycerol, 5 mm EDTA (pH 8), 1% (wt/vol) SDS and 0.02% bromophenol blue) for 5 min. Proteins were separated by electrophoreses [12% polyacrylamide gel (Peqlab “Perfect Blue”)] and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore Corp., USA), followed by immunoblotting. The blots were incubated with biotin-labeled human IGF-2 (1:500; BioIGF-2-10; Ibt GmbH, Germany). IGFBP were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence using the reagent Luminata Forte (Millipore Corp., USA) and bands were visualized on KODAK Image Station 4000 MM (Molecular Imaging Systems; Carstream Health Inc., USA) and afterwards semi-quantified by using ImageQuant 5.2 software (Molecular Dynamics, USA). For each IGFBP, curve fitting was done by a 7-parametric nonlinear regression (Hill equation).
Isolation of genomic DNA and bisulfite treatment
Genomic DNA (gDNA) from liver tissue was isolated using the Invisorb Genomic DNA Kit II (Stratec, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Bisulfite conversion of 500 ng gDNA was performed using the EpiTect Fast Bisulfite Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). Bisulfite-converted DNA (bsDNA) was purified as recommended and eluted in a total volume of 15 µl.
dBSP and pyrosequencing
Bisulfite-specific primers were designed using MethPrimer (45). PCRs (2.5 µl bsDNA) were performed using TaKaRa EpiTaq™ HS (Takara Bio Inc., Japan) and amplicons purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). Sanger sequencing of the samples was carried out by GATC Biotech (Germany). Quantification of dBSP was done as described previously (46). In order to avoid over-representation of cytosine peaks after normalization, the raw sequencing data were used for quantification (CodonCode Aligner Software, version 5.1.5, CodonCode Corporation, USA). Primers for pyrosequencing were designed using the PyroMark Assay Design software (QIAGEN, Germany). Pyrosequencing was performed on a PyroMark Q96 Pyrosequencer according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified using PyroMark Q96 software 2.5.7 (QIAGEN, Germany).
Construction of CpG-free reporter gene plasmid
A fragment of the murine Igfbp2 gene, 2320–2997 bp downstream of the TSS, was PCR amplified using primers generating restriction sites for BamHI (forward primer 5′-GATC GGATCC GAGC CTG GTT TTG CCA GGT TG) and NcoI (reversed primer 5′-GATC CCATGG GCC TGG CCT GAA TTC TGA AAG G) with JumpStart™ REDAccuTaq® LA DNA Polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The purified PCR amplificates were cloned into the promoter-less CpG-free pCpGL-Basic vector (kindly provided by Prof. Rehli, Regensburg, Germany) upstream of the luciferase reporter gene. For plasmid amplification, the construct (pCpGL-Igfbp2) was transformed into One Shot® PIR1 Competent Escherichia coli (Invitrogen, USA).
In vitro methylation of pCpGL-Igfbp2 was performed using either 4 U/µg DNA M.SssI or 2 U/µg DNA HpaII (New England Biolabs, USA) in the presence of 160 µmS-adenosylmethionine and incubated at 37°C for 1.5 h. After plasmid purification using QIAGEN QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) concentration was measured with the NanoDrop Spectrophometer (ND-1000, PeqLab, Germany).
AML12 cell culture and luciferase activity assay
The murine AML12 cell line (ATCC® CRL-2254™) was cultured in a 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium and Ham’s F12 medium (PAN-Biotech, Germany) with 0.005 mg/ml insulin (Roche Life Science, USA), 0.005 mg/ml transferrin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 5 ng/ml selenium (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 40 ng/ml dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biochrom, Germany). Cells were maintained in humidified air replenished with 5% CO2. In a 48-well plate, 4 × 104 AML12 cells/well were co-transfected using Lipofectamine®2000 (Invitrogen, USA) with 500 ng/well unmethylated or methylated pCpGL-Igfbp2 and 5 ng/well pRL-TK Renilla control vector (Promega, USA). After 48 h, cells were harvested and analyzed for firefly and renilla luciferase activity using the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, USA). Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to its renilla luciferase transfection control.
Human participants and whole blood collection
The study population consisted of 109 German individuals recruited from the ongoing Tübingen Family Study. The study currently comprises >2500 non-related individuals at increased risk for T2D, i.e. non-diabetic subjects with family history of type-2 diabetes, BMI ≥27 kg/m2, impaired fasting glycaemia, and/or previous gestational diabetes and healthy controls. All participants underwent assessment of medical history, smoking status and alcohol consumption habits, physical examination, routine blood tests and oral glucose tolerance tests (oGTTs). The study population consisted of individuals with complete oGTT and documented absence of medication known to influence glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity or insulin secretion. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and each participant signed a written informed consent. The Ethical Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Tübingen approved the study protocol. Subjects are grouped into normal glucose tolerant with BMI <27 (NGT.BMI <27, n = 29) or BMI >30 (NGT.BMI >30, n = 18) and impaired glucose tolerant with BMI <27 (IGT.BMI <27, n = 17) or BMI >30 (IGT.BMI >30, n = 31). Participant characteristics are shown in Table 3. A standardized 75 g oGTT was performed following a 10-h overnight fast. For the determination of plasma glucose venous blood samples were drawn at baseline and at time-points 30, 60, 90 and 120 min of the oGTT. For DNA methylation analysis, DNA was isolated from whole blood using a commercial kit (NucleoSpin, Macherey & Nagel, Düren, Germany).
. | NGT.BMI <27 (n = 29) . | NGT.BMI >30 (n = 18) . | IGT.BMI <27 (n = 17) . | IGT.BMI >30 (n = 31) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | |
Patient age (years) | 57.8 | 1.73 | 60.2 | 1.27 | 61.2 | 1.37 | 57.2 | 1.59 |
BMI | 24.5 | 0.33 | 33.5 | 0.73 | 25.43 | 0.21 | 34.3 | 0.65 |
Fasted BG (mm) | 5.4 | 0.08 | 5.6 | 0.11 | 5.7 | 0.14 | 6.0 | 0.11 |
oGTT (mm) | 5.9 | 0.14 | 6.0 | 0.27 | 9.3 | 0.20 | 9.2 | 0.19 |
. | NGT.BMI <27 (n = 29) . | NGT.BMI >30 (n = 18) . | IGT.BMI <27 (n = 17) . | IGT.BMI >30 (n = 31) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | |
Patient age (years) | 57.8 | 1.73 | 60.2 | 1.27 | 61.2 | 1.37 | 57.2 | 1.59 |
BMI | 24.5 | 0.33 | 33.5 | 0.73 | 25.43 | 0.21 | 34.3 | 0.65 |
Fasted BG (mm) | 5.4 | 0.08 | 5.6 | 0.11 | 5.7 | 0.14 | 6.0 | 0.11 |
oGTT (mm) | 5.9 | 0.14 | 6.0 | 0.27 | 9.3 | 0.20 | 9.2 | 0.19 |
. | NGT.BMI <27 (n = 29) . | NGT.BMI >30 (n = 18) . | IGT.BMI <27 (n = 17) . | IGT.BMI >30 (n = 31) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | |
Patient age (years) | 57.8 | 1.73 | 60.2 | 1.27 | 61.2 | 1.37 | 57.2 | 1.59 |
BMI | 24.5 | 0.33 | 33.5 | 0.73 | 25.43 | 0.21 | 34.3 | 0.65 |
Fasted BG (mm) | 5.4 | 0.08 | 5.6 | 0.11 | 5.7 | 0.14 | 6.0 | 0.11 |
oGTT (mm) | 5.9 | 0.14 | 6.0 | 0.27 | 9.3 | 0.20 | 9.2 | 0.19 |
. | NGT.BMI <27 (n = 29) . | NGT.BMI >30 (n = 18) . | IGT.BMI <27 (n = 17) . | IGT.BMI >30 (n = 31) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | Amount . | SEM . | |
Patient age (years) | 57.8 | 1.73 | 60.2 | 1.27 | 61.2 | 1.37 | 57.2 | 1.59 |
BMI | 24.5 | 0.33 | 33.5 | 0.73 | 25.43 | 0.21 | 34.3 | 0.65 |
Fasted BG (mm) | 5.4 | 0.08 | 5.6 | 0.11 | 5.7 | 0.14 | 6.0 | 0.11 |
oGTT (mm) | 5.9 | 0.14 | 6.0 | 0.27 | 9.3 | 0.20 | 9.2 | 0.19 |
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t-test, one-way ANOVA or linear regression analysis using the software Prism6 from Graph Pad Software (La Jolla, USA). Significance levels were set for p-values <0.05 (*), 0.01 (**) and 0.001 (***).
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material is available at HMG online.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Christine Gumz, Andrea Teichmann and Kathrin Warnke of the German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke for their skillful technical assistance. Furthermore, we thank Prof. Rehli from Regensburg University (Germany) for providing the pCpGL-basic vector used in the luciferase assays and Dr. Christine Höflich (Ligandis GbR, Germany) for performing the western ligand blot analysis.
Conflict of Interest statement. None declared.
Funding
This work was supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research [BMBF, DZD, grant 01GI0922]. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by German Ministry of Education and Research.