-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Daniel Fil, Abigail DeLoach, Shilpi Yadav, Duah Alkam, Melanie MacNicol, Awantika Singh, Cesar M. Compadre, Joseph J. Goellner, Charles A. O’Brien, Tariq Fahmi, Alexei G. Basnakian, Noel Y. Calingasan, Jodi L. Klessner, Flint M. Beal, Owen M. Peters, Jake Metterville, Robert H. Brown, Karen K.Y. Ling, Frank Rigo, P. Hande Ozdinler, Mahmoud Kiaei, Mutant Profilin1 transgenic mice recapitulate cardinal features of motor neuron disease , Human Molecular Genetics, Volume 26, Issue 4, 15 February 2017, ddw429, https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddw429
- Share Icon Share
The recent identification of profilin1 mutations in 25 familial ALS cases has linked altered function of this cytoskeleton-regulating protein to the pathogenesis of motor neuron disease. To investigate the pathological role of mutant profilin1 in motor neuron disease, we generated transgenic lines of mice expressing human profilin1 with a mutation at position 118 (hPFN1 G118V ). One of the mouse lines expressing high levels of mutant human PFN1 protein in the brain and spinal cord exhibited many key clinical and pathological features consistent with human ALS disease. These include loss of lower (ventral horn) and upper motor neurons (corticospinal motor neurons in layer V), mutant profilin1 aggregation, abnormally ubiquitinated proteins, reduced choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) enzyme expression, fragmented mitochondria, glial cell activation, muscle atrophy, weight loss, and reduced survival. Our investigations of actin dynamics and axonal integrity suggest that mutant PFN1 protein is associated with an abnormally low filamentous/globular (F/G)-actin ratio that may be the underlying cause of severe damage to ventral root axons resulting in a Wallerian-like degeneration. These observations indicate that our novel profilin1 mutant mouse line may provide a new ALS model with the opportunity to gain unique perspectives into mechanisms of neurodegeneration that contribute to ALS pathogenesis.
Introduction
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by the loss of upper and lower motor neurons. Affected individuals develop progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, eventually leading to death due to respiratory failure ( 1 , 2 ). Clinical studies and extensive basic research have provided initial insight into the pathogenic mechanisms of selective motor neuron degeneration. Nevertheless, the aetiology of sporadic ALS (sALS) remains largely unknown. Cases of familial ALS (fALS) account for ∼20% of ALS patients, and in approximately half of the affected families, fALS has been linked to a growing collection of gene mutations (e.g., SOD1 , TARDBP , FUS/TLS , OPTN , UBQLN2 , VCP , hnRNPA2B1 , hnRNPA1 , TBK1 , TUBA4A and C9ORF72 ) ( 3–10 ). The identification of these mutant genes establishes new rationale for exploring specific pathogenic processes and mechanisms as the basis of motor neuron death in ALS. Some of the genes linked to fALS have been used to generate mouse models to mimic ALS, and the most popular mouse models for ALS are the SOD1 -based mouse models ( 11–14 ). Other mouse and rat models generated are TARDBP , FUS , and C9ORF72 ( 15–19 ). SOD1 mutant mice are the most consistent model of ALS to date and have been highly informative in increasing our understanding of the role of mutant proteins in ALS and instrumental in therapeutic development. Therefore, additional mouse models of ALS that are equally consistent or better are desperately needed to gain further insights into the disease and discover novel pathways that could be targeted for therapeutic development to cure the disease, or at least slow its progression. We have developed such a model, which is described in this manuscript.
Recent identification of mutations in the profilin1 ( PFN1 ) gene in 25 human fALS patients focused attention on cytoskeletal dysfunction as a neurodegenerative factor in ALS. To date, eight different mutations (A20T, C71G, G118V, M114T, E117G, T109M, R136W, Q139L) in the profilin1 protein have been reported in the affected families ( 20–23 ). Profilin1 is ubiquitously expressed during all embryonic stages and in nearly all adult cell types and tissues ( 24 ). The most recognized function of profilin1 is its ability to regulate the assembly of filamentous actin (F-actin), implicating its involvement in cytoskeletal regulation, cell division, differentiation, migration, and maintenance ( 25–28 ). Profilin1 interacts with more than 50 ligands and binding partners involved in multiple cellular processes ranging from gene transcription, growth cone formation, axonal development and maintenance, to membrane trafficking. profilin1 regulates PI(3,4)P(2) (phosphatidylinositols) in MDA-MB-231 cells, and profilin1’s interaction with lipid products of PI3 kinase suggests that the plasma membrane may be a site of its action because accumulating evidence links profilin1 to signal transduction via G-proteins ( 29–32 ). The actin-binding and actin-independent functions of profilin1, as described above, argue for its importance in the maintenance of neuronal integrity by modulating cytoskeletal dynamics, axonal health, mitochondrial transport, and other cellular functions.
To shed light into possible abnormalities of profilin1 structure and/or function, which is caused by the G118V mutation associated with fALS, we used X-ray crystallography data from bovine profilin1 to construct a structural model for human profilin1. Using the PyMOL computer software program and molecular visualization system, we were able to depict the location of mutant amino acid residues relative to the actin-binding site ( Supplementary Material, Fig. S1A ). Given the proximity of the G118V to the actin-binding site and considering the side-chain size difference incurred by substitution of valine for glycine, it is possible that this mutation profoundly impacts profilin1’s interaction with G-actin or renders it ineffective in catalyzing the exchange of actin-ADP for actin-ATP ( 33 ). A notable effect of the G118V mutation, considering the small side chain of glycine (-H) and large side chain of valine (-CH-(CH3)2), may result in the disruption of the secondary structure of profilin1, resulting in unstable protein folding and attenuation of profilin1 interaction with G-actin, its ligands, and other binding partners. It became clear that to understand how changes in the profilin1 protein e.g. glycine to valine residue substitution with a large side-chain difference, other recent human C71G and M114T mutations, and new findings form crystallographic studies ( 34 ) it would be necessary to create an animal model expressing mutated profilin1. This would allow us to begin to dissect out the mechanisms by which this mutation causes neurodegeneration in vivo and contributes to the pathogenesis of fALS. Accordingly, we generated transgenic mouse lines overexpressing hPFN1 G118V and hPFN1 WT to investigate the molecular and pathogenic mechanisms of mutant profilin1 toxicity towards understanding the fundamental processes by which profilin1 influences motor neuron function, and to enable discovery of novel, promising therapeutic strategies. The novel mouse model that we have generated exhibits ALS-like pathogenic and behavioural phenotypes, and this is proof of principle that profilin1 mutation cause ALS. Additionally our study provides new information to advance our understanding of mechanisms of mutant profilin1 toxicity. Our new hPFN1 G118V mouse offers the opportunity to define specific roles of profilin1 in protein aggregations, neuronal dysfunction, axonal degeneration, actin dynamics, and it allows us to establish the importance of the equilibrium of (G)-actin and (F)-actin that is essential for cell division, adhesion, and motility as well as cytoskeletal remodeling, neuronal development, pathfinding, and synaptic plasticity.
Results
Generation of profilin1 transgenic mice

Human and mouse Profilin 1 expression levels. ( A ) Western blot analysis of mouse profilin 1 (PFN1) and untagged human PFN1 levels probed with anti-PFN1 antibody in 30 μg samples of total spinal cord homogenates from non-transgenic (non-TG), transgenic hPFN1 WT , and transgenic hPFN1 G118V lines. hPFN1 G118V/WT and mPFN1 migrated closer together and were seen as a doublet. Human PFN1 migrated behind mouse PFN1, as shown by arrows, which was due to 6 different amino acid residues. ( B ) Quantification of the band relative density (single bands in non-TG mice and double bands in transgenic mice) were normalized to GAPDH and presented as mean ± SEM. Asterisks denote significantly different PFN1 protein levels in transgenic lines versus non-TG, t -test, with Bonfroni post hoc, *** P ≤ 0.01, **** P< 0.0001. n = 3 for each group of mice.

Weight loss, motor performance and survival of hPFN1 G118V mice compared to hPFN1 WT and non-TG mice. ( A ) Body weights presented from P100 to P260. The weight of hPFN1 G118V mice began to drop from PD 150, n = 12-15. A repeated measure ANOVA followed by a Student-Newman-Keuls test, * P < 0.05. ( B ) Rotarod performance, n = 15/group, * P< 0.05. ( C ) Stride length measured in centimeters (cm) at P160 shows significant stride shortening in hPFN1 G118V mice ( n = 10), repeated measure of ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test **** P< 0.0001. ( D ) Kaplan-Meier survival plot of male and female hPFN1 G118V mice compared to hPFN1 WT ( n = 15), M = Males ( n = 43), F = Females ( n = 26). For A–C, data are presented as mean ± SEM. Asterisks in A, B, and C denote significant difference in weight, latency in rotarod, and stride length between hPFN1 G118V mice and non-TG or hPFN1 WT mice. Female mice survival is significantly shorter than males, as assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival with logrank (Mantel-Cox) test.
Effect of mutant profilin1 on gross morphology and survival

Abnormal phenotype of mutant hPFN1 G118V mice. Representative images of ( A ) physical appearance of mutant hPFN1 G118V mice from early-symptomatic (P145), fully symptomatic (P165) to endstage disease (average of P202). ( B ) Hind limb paralysis in hPFN1 G118V (left), normal reflex in non-TG littermates (right) at P165; skeletal muscle atrophy was observed in the hind limbs of hPFN1 G118V mice (bottom left) compared to non-TG littermates (bottom right) at P165.
The ability of hPFN1 G118V mice to stay on a rotating rod was impaired, as compared to control animals ( Fig. 2B ). Starting at P140, hPFN1 G118V mice demonstrated significantly shorter latency on rotarod that gradually deteriorated and eventually reached zero latency before falling ( Fig. 2B ). The average age of death for both males and females combined was 202 ± 30 days. The hPFN1 G118V females reached the end stage of disease at P191 ± 30 ( n = 26; range P139 to P271) and males reached the end stage of disease at P213 ± 29 ( n = 43; range P153 to P283) ( Fig. 2D ). The Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival data suggested a significant difference in lifespan between hPFN1 G118V male and female mice using the logrank (Mantel-Cox) test (Chi-Square +7.102; P value = 0.0077).
Pathologies of mutant profilin1 mice
Mutant profilin1 causes reduced hind limb CMAP amplitude

Assessment of compound muscle action potential (CMAP). ( A ) Electrophysiology system for measuring CMAP from the tibialis anterior muscle in the hind limbs of non-TG and hPFN1 G118V mice. ( B ) Reduction of CMAP in hPFN1 G118V mice with end-stage disease at P202. 1) Representative CMAP recordings and 2) CMAP amplitudes recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle. Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 4. Data analysed by t -test.
The CMAP amplitudes were drastically reduced in hPFN1 G118V mice, as compared to age-matched non-TG controls (non-TG, 81.3 ± 2.1 mV versus hPFN1 G118V mice, 24.0 ± 5.5 mV) ( Fig. 4B ), suggesting muscle function deficits that can be in part due to a reduction of innervating fibres and/or severe muscle atrophy. In addition, we observed a prolonged CMAP duration in hPFN1 G118V versus controls (non-TG, 2.9 ± 0.2 ms versus hPFN1 G118V mice, 3.4 ± 0.2 ms), which are signs of myopathy associated with critical illness ( 37 ) (Supplementary Material, Fig. S3 .)
Mutant profilin1 causes neuromuscular junction and muscle denervation

Degeneration of myelinated axons and neuromuscular junctions in symptomatic hPFN1 G118V mice. ( A ) Fluorescent immunostaining of neuromuscular junctions in the gastrocnemius muscles of non-TG (P180) and hPFN1 G118V mice at pre-symptomatic (P100), fully symptomatic (P165) and end-stage disease (P202). The red fluorescence is Alexa Fluor 555 conjugated α-bungarotoxin (α-BTX), green fluorescence is combined anti-synaptophysin and anti-β-III-tubulin and merged image shows colocalization of α-BTX and synaptophysin + β-III-tubulin. ( B ) Percentage of innervated, intermediate innervated or denervated gastrocnemius NMJs assessed per animal (non-TG n = 5, total NMJs assessed = 440; hPFN1 G118V Pre Sym n = 4, total NMJs assessed = 525; hPFN1 G118V Full Sym n = 4, total NMJs assessed = 537; hPFN1 G118V Endstage n = 3, total NMJs assessed = 754). Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons post-hoc testing was used, * P< 0.05, ** P< 0.01, *** P< 0.001). ( C ) Toluidine blue staining of semi-thin sections of sciatic nerve from end-stage disease hPFN1 G118V transgenic and non-TG mice. Degenerating myelinated axons (arrows) and glia containing phagocytized myelin (arrowheads) were evident in sciatic nerves of endstage disease hPFN1 G118V transgenic mice. Each panel represents a separate animal. Scale bars: A,C = 20 μm.
Mutant profilin1 causes loss of ventral horn spinal neurons

Neuronal cell count in lumbar spinal cord from non-TG and hPFN1 G118V mice. ( A,B ) The effect of hPFN1 G118V protein toxicity on lumbar spinal neurons quantified by unbiased stereological count of Nissl stained neurons in spinal cords of hPFN1 G118V mice at full symptomatic disease (P165–175) and end-stage disease (P165-210). Nissl-stained count of lumbar spinal cord neurons from similarly aged littermates of control mice is quantified for comparison. High magnification images taken under 40x objective form the black square area of the ventral horn of spinal cord from the 10x objective. Data were analysed by one way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer post-hoc. Values are mean ± standard deviation with n = 6 per group. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Mutant profilin1 is associated with loss of ChAT and mislocalized TDP-43

Immunohistochemical analysis of lumbar spinal cord ventral horn. ( A ) Spinal cord isolated from end-stage diseased mice (P165–210) were processed and stained for pathological abnormalities. H&E stained sections show dysmorphic ventral horn neurons (arrows) in hPFN1 G118V mice. ( B ) Micrograph of sections showing ChAT stained sections from hPFN1 G118V spinal cord and light staining for ChAT in the remaining neurons. ( C ) Spinal cord sections show abnormal TDP-43 staining in spinal ventral horn neurons from hPFN1 G118V mice during end-stage disease. ( D ) Micrograph of sections (high magnitude) stained with anti-TDP-43 showing abnormal TDP-43 staining in spinal ventral horn neurons from end-stage disease hPFN1 G118V mice. ( E and F ) Micrograph of phospho-TDP-43 staining (low & high magnitude) in the ventral horn neurons from end-stage disease hPFN1 mice. Left panels are sections from non-TG littermates, n = 3. Scale bars: A, B, D, F, 10 μm; C, E, 40 μm.
Mutant profilin1 impairs actin polymerization

Actin dynamics in non-TG, hPFN1 WT and hPFN1 G118V mice. Lumbar spinal cord sections were processed to assess G-actin and F-actin status. Representative images show ( A ) Phalloidin stain (green) Factin and DNase I stain (red) G-actin in ventral horn neurons of non-TG, hPFN1 WT , and hPFN1 G118V mice at presymptomatic, fully symptomatic and end-stage disease, n = 9. ( B ) Quantification of phalloidin and DNases I signal density plotted as F/G-actin ratio. Values are mean ± SEM. Data analysed by t -test followed by two-way ANOVA Bonferroni. * P< 0.05 relative to non-TG animals, n = 3, and 3-5 sections were examined per animal. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Mutant profilin1 and glial activation

Glial cell activation in spinal cord ventral horn. Lumbar spinal cord sections were examined for glial activation and immunostained with ( A ) an astrocyte marker (GFAP) and ( B ) microglia marker (IBA1), which revealed activation of glial cells in the spinal cords of end-stage disease hPFN1 G118V , as compared to hPFN1 WT and non-TG mice (P175-P205), n = 3. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Mutant profilin1 aggregation and excess protein ubiquitination

Mutant PFN1 G118V aggregation and abnormal protein ubiquitination. Western blot analysis of spinal cords from non-TG, hPFN1 WT and hPFN1 G118V animals. ( A ) Profilin 1 signal in soluble (S) and insoluble (I) fractions. An antibody against profilin1 recognizes both mouse and human PFN1. The same blot was probed with anti-GAPDH. ( B ) Ubiquitinated proteins in soluble (S) and insoluble (I) fractions show a dense smear of protein larger than 50 kDa. ( C ) Quantification of PFN1 band intensity relative to GAPDH presented as mean ± SEM. ( D ) Western blot analysis and quantifications of band density of insoluble fractions from the spinal cord of hPFN1 G118V mice from P50 to end-stage disease, n = 3 per time point. The increasing trend did not reach statistical significance. This blot was probed with anti-GAPDH for loading control and quantification. Data analysed by t -test followed by two-way ANOVA Bonferroni. * P< 0.05, ** P< 0.01, *** P< 0.001 relative to non-TG (S) or (I) respectively. (PD 175-PD 205), n = 3 per genotype.
Mutant profilin1 causes axonal degeneration and abnormal fragmentation of mitochondrial outer membrane

Electron micrographs of ventral root motor axons from hPFN1 G118V and non-TG controls. Ultrastructure of lumbar spinal cord, ventral root axons (VR) from non-TG and end-stage hPFN1 G118V animals were examined by electron microscopy. ( A ) Non-TG VR reveals normal axons and normal mitochondria (inset A1). ( B ) hPFN1 G118V VR shows distorted axons containing fragmented mitochondria (inset B1); membrane blebbing and disorganized cristae are also seen. Asterisks mark clasped, shrunk and degenerating axons. ( C ) hPFN1 G118V VR axon at higher magnification demonstrates separation and vacuolization of damaged myelin sheath and clasping axoplasm. ( D ) hPFN1 G118V VR axon shows vacuoles (short arrows) and the remainder of the damaged mitochondria (long arrow). Representative image of n = 4. Scale bars A, B = 5 μm; C = 2 μm; D = 1 μm, A1 = 200 nm, B1 = 100 nm.
Mutant profilin1 causes upper motor neuron pathology

CSMN undergo cellular degeneration in hPFN1 G118V mice. ( A ) Non-TG mice. ( B ) hPFN1 G118V mice. The cerebral cortex appears normal with Nissl staining. The thickness of the motor cortex, size of the ventricles and the cortical layers are comparable, without any signs of massive cortical degeneration. ( C,D ) High levels of CTIP2 expression marks large pyramidal CSMN in layer V of the motor cortex of both non-TG and hPFN1 G118V mice (C), albeit with a potential for reduction in hPFN1 G118V mice, as observed in four independent samples. ( E,F ) Cry-mu, another cellular marker for CSMN, also displays a differential expression pattern in non-TG (E) versus hPFN1 G118V mice (F). The reduction in Cry-mu expression of CSMN is more evident in higher magnification (E’-F’). ( G ) Quantitative assessment of CSMN numbers, based on CTIP2 expression, reveal significant neuron loss, especially during end-stage disease. Bar graph represents the average number of CSMN per 10× objective field in layer V of the motor cortex of non-TG and hPFN1 G118V mice during mid-stage disease ( n = 3 mice for both genotype) and end-stage disease ( n = 6 mice for both genotype, 3F, 3M). Bar graphs represent mean ± SEM. Data analysed with a one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. **** P< 0.0001. Scale bars: A, B = 200 μm; C, D = 100 μm; E, F = 150 μm. (H,I) Vacuolization of apical dendrites of diseased CSMN. CTIP2 coupled with Map2 immunocytochemistry reveals profound defects in the apical dendrites of diseased CSMN (H) Four different representative images of non-TG CSMN with healthy apical dendrites. Arrows indicate apical dendrites, which are enlarged to the side. (I) Four different representative images of CSMN in hPFN1 G118V mice during end-stage disease. Even though cell bodies are comparable to the non-TG CSMN, the apical dendrites include many vacuoles that are only seen in the brain motor cortex of hPFN1 G118V mice. Arrows indicate the site of apical dendrites with profound defects, which are enlarged to the side. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Apical dendrite degeneration in CSMN can become diseased from different underlying causes (i.e., mSOD1 G93A , lack of Alsin function) ( 40–42 ), suggesting that apical dendrite degeneration could be a common cellular pathology observed in diseased CSMN. Therefore, we investigated whether apical dendrites of CSMN retain their integrity or instead fail to maintain their cyto-architecture, especially at the apical dendrite. Map2 immunocytochemistry coupled with CTIP2 expression helped identify CSMN and visualize their apical dendrites. Non-TG CSMN had long, prominent apical dendrites that did not include any vacuoles. In striking contrast, CSMN in hPFN1 G118V mice had multiple abnormalities in their apical dendrites. In most cases, the apical dendrites were filled with vacuoles, which varied by size and number ( Fig. 12H and I ). Interestingly, these abnormalities were present only in the CSMN of hPFN1 G118V mice, suggesting the presence of a cellular pathology that is especially observed in CSMN in the presence of mutant profilin1.
Discussion
The present study reports a novel in vivo mouse model for ALS overexpressing hPFN1 G118V without a tag from a single transgene DNA construct that exhibits behaviours and pathologies closely resembling ALS. Since there is a biochemical evidence that adding a tag on a relatively small profilin1 protein may influence its biochemical binding properties ( 43 ), we developed a mouse model that can uniquely model the disease by expressing human mutant profilin1 unmodified. The ALS field has a limited number of reliable disease models available to researchers, and this underscores the importance of introducing and validating new mouse models. Our study led to the development and detailed characterization of a transgenic mouse model for ALS and investigated the effects of mutant profilin1 in vivo . We report our findings of neurotoxic mutant profilin1 and describe this novel ALS mouse model as a ‘new window’ of opportunity for understanding the effects of mutant profilin1 in ALS. As we demonstrated with evidence throughout this manuscript, we found that the expression of hPFN1 G118V in mice produces ALS-like symptoms, including loss of lower and upper motor neurons, mutant profilin1 aggregation, abnormally higher levels of ubiquitinated proteins, glial cell activation, muscle atrophy, weight loss and early death. The hPFN1 G118V phenotype and pathology closely resembles the phenotype and pathology of human ALS and aligns with other well-characterized transgenic ALS mouse models, for example SOD1 mutants, suggesting shared pathological mechanisms, despite different initial causative factors ( 11 , 12 , 15 ).
A reduction of ChAT, an important marker for cholinergic neurons, in the ventral horn area of the lumbar spinal cord in hPFN1 G118V mice is consistent with a previous report of decreased ChAT activity in spinal cord motor neurons from human ALS patients ( 44–46 ). ChAT immunoreactivity reduction indicates the health status of motor neurons in the hPFN1 G118V mouse spinal cord. In this study, we show that existing neurons are unable to express high levels of ChAT, compared to wild type controls.
Our analysis of ultrastructural images from ventral root axons by EM shows multiple cellular abnormalities. These include fragmented mitochondria with membrane blebbing and disorganized cristae, cytoskeletal abnormalities, separation and vacuolization of the myelin sheath. These pathological findings resemble Wallerian-like degeneration that occurs in many neurodegenerative diseases, especially those in which axonal transport is impaired ( 47 ). The degeneration may reflect the failure of the cytoskeletal infrastructure in dendrites, axons and axonal roots caused by a reduction in the F/G-actin ratio. These pathologies also are consistent with delivering insufficient quantities of essential axonal proteins, like nicotinamide nucleotide adenylyltransferase 2 (NMNAT2), a key initiating event for Wallerian-like degeneration ( 48 ). Other studies have indicated that ALS is a distal axonopathy (reviewed in ( 49 )), although it remains unclear whether the distal denervation is primary or secondary to progressive pathology in the motor neuron cell body.
In this study, we found significant neuromuscular junction disruption and denervation of gastrocnemius muscle at the fully symptomatic and end stages of disease. A recent study in which primary mouse hippocampal neurons were transiently transfected with mutant PFN1 C71G reported an increase in dendritic arborization and spines, and cytoplasmic inclusions were also found in the neurons ( 50 ). However, given the way mutant PFN1 C71G impairs profilin1 binding to actin, it is not clear how PFN1 C71G transient overexpression stimulation increase dendritic arborization and spines since these same neurons are thought to be burdened with inclusions. Further studies are needed to unravel the effects of mutant profilin1 on cytoskeleton and neuronal processes and determine whether distal axonopathy is the earliest event in PFN1 G118V mice.
Other mutations in profilin1 (e.g., C71G, M114T) provide experimental evidence to link the pathogenesis of ALS to cytoskeletal defects ( 10 , 22 ), implying that impaired binding of profilin1 to actin may be an important factor for mutant profilin1 neurotoxicity in ALS. Our finding of a reduced F/G-actin ratio in lumbar spinal cord sections of end-stage disease hPFN1 G118V animals strengthens this hypothesis. The T109M and Q139L mutations cause ALS despite unaltered actin binding properties. These mutations are located on the PLP domain ( 51 ), which may impact other profilin1 functions. This is an indication for diverse mechanism of profilin1 toxicity, which is discussed in details in our recent review ( 52 ). Other functions of profilin1, independent of actin binding, also may be critical to the survival of motor neurons and may contribute to the pathogenicity of ALS. It is plausible that mutations in profilin1 may block the interaction of profilin1 with its ligands and binding partners (i.e., SMN, huntingtin, valosin-containing protein (VCP), Ezrin, and N-WASP) and may affect other important signaling events in the motor neuron ( 28 , 53–55 ).
Actin polymerization is essential for the formation and remodeling of the cytoskeleton and outgrowth of axons and dendrites. Actin polymerization is also important for cell motility, actin attachment to microtubules, and anterograde and retrograde transport of mitochondria into axons and dendrites. Profilin1 activity is particularly important for neurons because of its association with a variety of ligands that are necessary for the integrity of postsynaptic scaffolding, dendritic spine morphology, growth cone formation, axon guidance, neurite outgrowth, clustering of receptors, membrane trafficking, and endocytosis ( 28 ). Studies in primary motor neurons found pathological evidence that further links mutant profilin1 alterations to ALS pathogenesis, strengthening the rationale for the involvement of a cytoskeletal component in axonal degeneration ( 22 ).
Since profilin1 is evolutionarily highly conserved ( Supplementary Material, Fig. S1B ), its structural integrity must be vital for its biological functions. As illuminated by a PyMOL-generated model constructed from bovine profilin1 X-ray crystal structure data, the G118V mutation in profilin1 is proximal to the actin-binding site ( Supplementary Material, Fig. S1A ) and may alter the secondary structure of profilin1 due to side chain difference and impacting the folding and stability of the protein. The aberrant conformation of the binding site alters profilin1–actin interactions with actin and other binding partners. This may have a direct effect on profilin1 stability, solubility, and formation of inclusion bodies or alterations of cytoskeletal dynamics that consequently lead to pathology. A recent study by Bosco and colleagues ( 34 ) showed that ALS-linked mutations severely destabilize the native conformation of profilin1 in vitro and cause accelerated turnover of the profilin1 protein in cells. Thermochemical analyses of the profilin1 variants C71G, M114T, and G118V suggest a severe effect on tertiary conformation and that PFN1 C71G and PFN1 M114T , but not PFN1 E117G , are destabilized as compared to PFN1 WT ( 34 ). The observation that most ALS-linked profilin1 variants are highly prone to aggregation in cultured mammalian cells suggests that the disease-causing mutations induce an abnormal protein conformation ( 22 ). Our study and other independent research teams provide support for the concept that profilin1 mutations contribute to ALS pathogenesis by diverse mechanisms ( 51 , 56–58 ). New evidence for the mechanism of profilin1 toxicity that involve the PLP binding domain as well as the actin-binding domain is gaining support. Although, the mutations in the PLP domain of profilin1 (T109M, R136W, Q139L) suggest a more global effect on profilin1 and the toxicity may be caused by actin-binding and other domains, hence actin dynamics and cytoskeletal dysfunction are parts of a bigger picture of neuronal dysfunction ( 51 , 58 ).
Since TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) is a major component in aggregates of ubiquitinated proteins in most types of ALS ( 8 , 59 , 60 ), it is intriguing that the G118V mutation produced profilin1 aggregation and sequestering of endogenous TDP-43 ( 38 ). Co-aggregation of mutant profilin1 with TDP-43 may result in a gain-of-toxic-function of profilin1 mutants. Our results give evidence towards this. We found that TDP-43 abnormally stained in the spinal cord sections of hPFN1 G118V mice ( Fig. 7C and D ) and that immunostaining show that phosphorylated TDP-43 was increased in the nucleus of neurons in the spinal cord of hPFN1 G118V mice ( Fig. 7E and F ).
Exploration of the profilin1 transgenic mouse model in relation to other ALS models provides an extraordinary opportunity to gain insight into the mechanisms of motor neuron degeneration and shed light on shared pathways of disease pathogenesis, despite different causative factors. This new tool in ALS research invites further investigation of profilin1 toxicity, and it can serve as a novel platform to explore cytoskeletal and axonal dysfunctions in ALS and to validate screening of new therapeutics for human ALS.
While our manuscript report of this study was under review, a manuscript was published describing the generation and characterization of another transgenic profilin1 mouse model that expresses V5-PFN1 C71G and develops ALS-like symptoms ( 61 ). This report is interesting and is significant for the proof of concept that a mutation in profilin1 is one of the main contributors to ALS. A new milestone in ALS research has been reached in that two independent laboratories demonstrate that a profilin1 mutation is a cause for ALS by G118V and C71G in the profilin1 protein. The transgenic profilin1 mice, reported by Yang et al., 2016, developed robust ALS-like symptoms and pathologies, but multiple transgenes were needed to express high levels of mutant profilin1 protein to reduce ALS age of onset because the single transgene mice (Thy1.2-PFN1 C71G ) had an onset of weakness at ∼350 days. Two Prp-PFN1 C71G lines did not develop any ALS phenotypes up to P700. Authors crossed the Thy1.2-PFN1 C71G littermates to double the transgene and developed homozygote mice in an effort to further increase transgene expression. These double transgenic Thyl-PFN1 C71G mice were further crossed with a Prp-PFN1 C71G line to create a new triple transgenic line that enabled higher expression levels of mutant profilin1 from multiple loci. The age of disease onset was at ∼P140 with paralysis at ∼P211, on average. This mouse model could serve as a tool to investigate profilin1 with C71G mutation and neurotoxicity in ALS.
The mouse model that we developed in our laboratory and described herein expresses a high level of mutant profilin1 from a single DNA construct transgene and develop motor weakness at P130–140 and succumb to death because of ALS at P202, on average. This long symptomatic period will enable ALS researchers to utilize this new mouse model to address the neurotoxicity, proteinopathy, cytoskeletal defects and axonal degeneration caused by profilin1 with a G118V mutation. This model is valuable for mechanistic studies and development of therapeutic strategies and can be paired with existing and future ALS mouse models. This is due to the fact that the neurodegeneration and ALS-like symptoms and pathologies are induced by single transgene DNA vector expressing human profilin1 without any tag.
Since cytoskeletal defects in the brain, and spinal cord tissues emerge as one the most important causes of motor neuron vulnerability and progressive degeneration in ALS, here we offer a novel mouse model that can be used to not only study the details of the cytoskeletal defects, cellular mechanisms affected and the underlying causes of the pathology but also for translational studies in the near future.
Materials and Methods
Development of mouse model for ALS
Animals were housed in the animal quarters under 12-hour light/dark conditions and fed 4–5 gram chow diet (Harlan/Teklad #7001) per day per mouse with free access to water. All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS).
Generation of transgenic hPFN1 G118V and hPFN1 WT mice
Constructs expressing either wild type (hPFN1 WT ) or mutant (hPFN1 G118V ) untagged human profilin1 ( Supplementary Material, Fig. S1 ) were obtained from (NorClone, London, Ontario, Canada). cDNAs were inserted downstream of the mouse prion promoter (moPrP) to achieve robust CNS-specific expression of the single transgene ( 62 ) because this promoter has been widely used to model neurodegenerative diseases and ALS ( 15 , 36 , 63 ). The human wild type and mutant profilin1 cDNA sequences are available upon request. Transgenic mice were produced by pronuclear injection of C57BL/6 fertilized eggs at the UAMS Transgenic Mouse Core facility. All transgenic development procedures were reviewed and approved by the UAMS IACUC and the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System. Mice were genotyped for the presence of the transgene and founders were closely monitored for manifestation of ALS-like symptoms. Males and females were used at equal ratios, where it was possible. To prevent the tendency to become overweight, mice were fed 4–5 grams of regular chow per mouse, per day with the approval of UAMS IACUC.
Genotyping
Mouse genomic DNA was isolated from ∼3 mm tail biopsies with Maxwell 16 mouse tail DNA purification kit (Catalog # AS1120, Promega, Madison, WI) and used as a template for genotyping. PCR was performed using the following steps: 94ºC 5 min, (94ºC 30 s, 56ºC 30 s, 72ºC 1 min)x35, 72ºC 3 min, and hold 4ºC until stopped. Once the genotyping protocol was established, a DNA template for PCR was isolated from ∼3 mm tail biopsies by incubation in 75 µl alkaline lysis buffer (25 mM NaOH, 0.2 mM disodium EDTA, pH = 12) for 30 min at 95ºC. This was followed by 75 µl neutralization solution (40 mM Tris-HCl) for 10 min at 4ºC. 2 µl of the solution was used as DNA template, and PCR with SigmaRED PCR ReadyMix (Sigma, Catalog # R4775) was performed. The PCR products were loaded on a 2% agarose gel, separated by electrophoresis in 1XTAE buffer, and visualized with SYBR Safe DNA gel stain (Sigma, Catalog # S33102). Primers used for genotyping human PFN1 transgenic mice were: hPFN1 forward: GTTATGAAATGGCCTCCCACCT, mPrp reverse: TCAGTGCCAGGGGTATTAGC. A unique product length of 190-bp was generated from the hPFN1 cDNA transgene. mPrp forward: GAGCAGGCCCATGATCCATT, mPrP reverse: TCAGTGC CAGGG GT ATTAGC. The product length of 506-bp was generated from mouse endogenous gene.
Motor performance assessment by rotarod apparatus
Motor performance was assessed using a rotarod apparatus (Harvard Panlab Rota-Rod apparatus, Holliston, MA), as described elsewhere ( 64 ). Briefly, motor performance was measured via the latency to fall from a rod rotating at a constant speed of 12 rotations per minute (rpm). A perfect score of 180 s without falling was the benchmark used to track performance. Each mouse participated in three trials per test session (max 3 min), with the best result of three trials recorded.
Gait analysis
Mouse gait parameters were assessed using Noldus CATWALK as well as by manual application of non-toxic ink to paws. The imprints of ink paws on paper were used to access gait abnormality and stride lengths.
Weight
Animal weights were recorded twice a week starting at P50.
Western blotting
Fresh or snap-frozen tissues were homogenized with RIPA buffer, mixed with sample loading buffer (6% SDS, 15% 2-mercaptoethanol, 30% glycerol, and 0.3 mg/ml bromophenol blue in 188 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8), heated at 90 °C for 10 min, and separated by 4–12% Bis-Tris Gel (Invitrogen). Separated proteins in the gels were transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane at 380 mA for 45 min ( 30 ). The blotted membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk in TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TBS-T buffer) for 30–60 min. After washing the membrane with TBS-T primary antibodies, including profilin1 (Sigma Catalog # P7749), ubiquitin (Millipore Catalog # MAB1510), and GAPDH (Cell Signaling Catalog# 14C10), it was diluted in TBS-T, 5% milk was added, and the membrane was incubated overnight at 4 °C. The bound antibodies were detected by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Amersham Corp.) followed by the ECL detection system (Amersham), according to the manufacturer's instruction.
Soluble and insoluble fractionation
Freshly isolated or frozen spinal cords were processed for fractionation, as described in Wu et al., 2012 with some modifications. Isolated tissues were homogenized in NP-40 lysis buffer containing (1% NP-40, 20 mM TrisHCl pH. 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate) with EDTA-free protease inhibitors (Complete, Roche). The lysates were rotated for 30 min at 4 °C, followed by centrifugation at 13,500 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant was removed and used as the soluble fraction. To remove carryovers, the pellet was washed with lysis buffer and resuspended in urea-SDS buffer (NP-40 Lysis Buffer with 8 M urea/3% SDS) followed by sonication. The lysate was then spun again for 20 min at 4° C and the supernatant was removed (insoluble fraction). Protein concentrations were determined by the BCA assay.
Perfusion
Mice were deeply anaesthetized with isoflurane, followed by transcardial perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde for immunohistochemistry or 4% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde for electron microscopy. Brain, spinal cord, and gastrocnemius muscle were removed and post-fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde or 4% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde, as previously described ( 64 ).
Immunohistochemistry
Paraffin-embedded sections
Brains were sectioned coronally (50 μm thick) using a vibratome (Leica) and collected in 12-well plates. Immunocytochemistry was performed on every 12 th tissue section. Sections were mounted onto glass slides and dried overnight at ambient temperature. They were then deparaffinized with xylene, hydrated in descending concentrations of ethanol, rinsed in water, and immersed in 0.5% cresyl violet for 3 hours. After dehydration in ascending ethanol and xylene, the slides were cover slipped with DEPEX Mounting Media (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Sections were incubated with 0.01 M sodium citrate, pH 9.0 in an 80° C water bath for 3 hours for antigen retrieval followed by blocking (PBS, 0.05% BSA, 2% FBS, 1% Triton X-100, and 0.1% saponin). Primary antibodies for profilin1 (1:1000, Sigma), anti-Map2 (1:500; Millipore), anti-Ctip2 (1:500; Abcam), and anti-Cry-mu (1:200; Atlas Antibodies) were applied and incubated overnight at 4° C. Secondary antibodies (i.e., 1:500, Alexa-Flour 488 or 647; Invitrogen) were applied in blocking solution for 2 hours at room temperature in the dark. Sections were mounted and cover slipped with Fluoromount (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Quantification of pixel (DAB induced brown colour) was analysed by ImageJ.
Frozen sections
Tissues were cryopreserved by incubation in 20% sucrose until tissue sank (1–2 days), frozen in the TissueTek cutting medium (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA). The spinal cords were cut into longitudinal sections 30 µm in thickness with cryostat (Leica CM1900). Unspecific binding sites were blocked by incubation with (PBS, 5% FBS, 0.5% Triton X-100) for 2 hours at room temperature. Primary and secondary antibodies were suspended in (PBS, 1% FBS, 0.1% Triton X-100). Sections were incubated overnight at 4° C with primary antibodies: profilin1 (1:1000, Sigma), GFAP (1:1000; Novus Biologicals NB-300-141), and IBA1 (1:1000; Wako 019-19741) and 2 hours at room temperature with secondary antibodies (i.e., 1:500, Alexa-Flour 488 or 647; Invitrogen). F/G-actin ratio was assayed by staining tissues with phalloidin (1:200, Sigma) to detect F-actin and DNaseI conjugates (1:200, ThermoFisher) to detect G-actin. Sections were mounted onto glass slides with DAPI/anti-fade mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). Images were taken with Zeiss Confocal Microscope Confocal LSM 510 (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). Quantification of fluorescence intensity was analysed by ImageJ.
Neuromuscular junction immunohistochemistry
Gastrocnemius muscle was dissected from mice, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and processed as described in ( 16 ).
Electron microscopy
Spinal cord ventral roots were dissected and fixed overnight at 4 °C in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences)/0.05% malachite green (Sigma) in 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer, ph 7.2 (EMS). After washing with 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer, the samples were postfixed for 2 hours with 1% osmium tetroxide (EMS)/0.8% potassium hexaferrocyanide (Sigma) for 2 hours and 1% tannic acid (EMS) for 20 min. The samples were rinsed with molecular grade water, stained with 0.5% uranyl acetate (EMS) for 1 hour, and then dehydrated with a graded alcohol series and propylene oxide before embedding in Araldite/Embed 812 (EMS). Thin sections were cut on a Leica UC7 ultramicrotome, collected on formvar carbon coated slot grids, and post stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Imaging was taken with a Technai F20 (FEI) at 80kv.
Measurement of CMAP amplitude
With the mouse under 2% isoflurane anaesthesia, the sciatic nerve was stimulated percutaneously by single pulses of 0.1 ms duration (VikingQuest NCS/EMG Portable EMG machine) delivered through a pair of needle electrodes placed at the sciatic notch. CMAP was recorded with the recording electrode placed sub-dermally on the muscle belly of the TA muscle. A reference electrode was placed near the ankle and a ground electrode at the animals’ back, near the midline. Disposable mono-polar needle electrodes (25mm, 28G; catalog # 902-DMF25-TP, Natus Medical Inc., San Carlos, CA) were used for both stimulating and recording. The CMAP trace used for analysis from a given animal/leg was obtained from 4 supra-maximal stimuli. The CMAP value of an individual animal at a given time point represents the averaged peak-to-peak amplitude of both left and right legs. CMAP plot represents average CMAP of all animals ± SEM. Data were analysed with unpaired t-tests .
Stereological cell counts
Nissl positive neurons were counted using standard procedures for stereological analysis, as performed routinely in our laboratory and described elsewhere ( 65 ).
Imaging and quantification of CSMN
Sections were analysed using an Eclipse TE2000-E microscope (Nikon). Epifluorescence images were acquired with a Digital Sight DS-Qi1MC CCD camera (Nikon), and light images were acquired with Digital Sight DS-Fi1 camera (Nikon). Quantitative analyses were performed on 3 matched sections (Section1: Bregma 1.18 mm, interaural 4.98 mm; Section 2: Bregma 0.74 mm, interaural 4.54 mm; Section 3: Bregma 0.14 mm, interaural 3.94 mm) that spanned the motor cortex from hPFN1 G118V mice (at the onset of ALS, n = 3; end-stage disease n = 6) and age-matched wild type mice (non-TG), ( n = 3; end-stage disease n = 6). An equivalent area of the motor cortex in three serial sections (at least ∼600 µm apart) was imaged with 10X objective field per mouse that represents the motor cortex area. The total numbers of large-diameter, Ctip2 + neurons in layer V of the motor cortex were blindly counted in a total of three sections per mouse.
Nissl staining
Sections were stained with 0.75% cresyl violet, dehydrated through graded alcohols (70, 95, 100% 2×), placed in xylene and cover slipped using DPX mountant.
H&E staining
H&E staining was performed on 5μm paraffin sections using standard H&E staining protocol.
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using Prism software (version 5; Graphpad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). D’Agostino and Pearson Normality tests were performed on all data prior to analysis. Statistical differences between non-TG, hPFN1 WT and hPFN1 G118V mice were determined using a one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison tests using GraphPad. Repeated measure ANOVA was used for weight and Rotarod data. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for survival data. Data were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material is available at HMG online.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Dr. Nancy Rusch for valuable discussions and comments on the manuscript. Dr. Paymaan Jafar-Nejad is acknowledged for his helpful and constructive discussion. We acknowledge the valuable help of medical student, Garrett Waggoner, and summer students, Ezra Feldman, Ferhan Kawser and Gabriel Munson.
Conflict of Interest statement . F.R., and K.K.Y.L., are paid employees of Ionis Pharmaceuticals. None declared for other authors.
Funding
This work was supported by the following funding agencies. The authors acknowledge funding for support of this study by grants from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Startup Fund, Pepper Center Pilot Award, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Center for Translational Neurosciences, National Institute of General Medical Sciences IDeA Program Award P30 GM110702, P20GM109005, VA Merit Review I01 BX002425-01.
M.K., gratefully acknowledges the grant support by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NS088653. The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences college of Medicine Pilot Study grant award partially supported this study. M.M. is supported by NIH/NICHD Grant R01HD087057.
Work by P.H.O’s laboratory was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke NS085750 and a grant from the Les Turner ALS Foundation.
R.H.B. gratefully acknowledges the ALS Association, the ALS/FTD ALS Genetics Consortium, the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS088689, RO1FD004127, RO1NS079836, RO1NS065847, RO1NS073873), the ALS Therapy Alliance, the Angel Fund, and Project ALS.
O.P. is supported by the Michael J. Fox Foundation. Funds to pay for Open Access publication charges were provided by the UAMS Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, and by the UAMS College of Medicine Start-up Account to Dr. Kiaei.
References
Author notes
The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors.