-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
L.J. Moran, W.J. Brown, S.A. McNaughton, A.E. Joham, H.J. Teede, Weight management practices associated with PCOS and their relationships with diet and physical activity, Human Reproduction, Volume 32, Issue 3, March 2017, Pages 669–678, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew348
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Do weight management practices differ in women with and without PCOS?
Women in the general population with self-reported PCOS are more likely to be using healthy weight management practices and alternative non-lifestyle measures for weight management than women without PCOS.
Lifestyle management is the first-line treatment in PCOS. However, the specific weight management practices used by women with PCOS and their effect on diet and physical activity are unclear.
The study was a population-based observational cross-sectional study involving women in the 1973–1978 cohort (n = 7767 total; n = 556 with PCOS, n = 7211 without PCOS).
Women with and without self-reported PCOS were included. Self-reported outcome measures included healthy lifestyle-related or alternative non-lifestyle-related (e.g. laxatives or smoking) weight management practices, dietary intake and physical activity.
Women with PCOS were more likely to be following both healthy [reducing meal or snack size (odds ratio (OR) 1.50, 95% CI 1.14, 1.96, P = 0.004) and reducing fat or sugar intake (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.03, 1.69, P = 0.027) or following a low glycaemic index diet (OR 2.88, 95% CI 2.30, 3.59, P < 0.001)] and alternative [smoking (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.02, 2.52, P = 0.043) or use of laxative, diet pills, fasting or diuretics (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.07, 1.97, P = 0.017)] weight management practices than women without PCOS. In PCOS, the use of a range of healthy weight management practices was associated with increases in physical activity (P < 0.001), diet quality (P < 0.001), percentage protein intake (P < 0.001) and decreases in glycaemic index (P < 0.001), and percentages of fat (P = 0.001), saturated fat (P < 0.001) or fibre (P = 0.003). Use of alternative weight management practices was associated with decreases in diet quality.
Limitations include the use of self-reported data for PCOS, height, weight, diet, physical activity and weight management behaviours.
In PCOS, we should focus on improving healthy weight practices across both diet quality and quantity, and on assessing alternative weight practices and their potential adverse effect on dietary intake.
L.M. is supported by a South Australian Cardiovascular Research Development Program Fellowship (ID AC11S374); a program collaboratively funded by the National Heart Foundation, the South Australian Department of Health and the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute. H.T. is supported by the NHMRC. S.A.M. is supported by an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship Level 2, ID1104636 and was previously supported by an ARC Future Fellowship (2011–2015, FT100100581). The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Not applicable
Introduction
PCOS is a common endocrine condition affecting up to 18% of reproductive-aged women (March et al., 2010). It is associated with adverse reproductive, metabolic and psychological features (Moran et al., 2010a,b; Barry et al., 2011; Hart and Doherty, 2015). Insulin resistance is a key aetiological component of PCOS, intrinsically present even in lean women (Stepto et al., 2013) in a form mechanistically distinct from that associated with obesity. Weight gain subsequently contributes further to insulin resistance and worsens the features (Lim et al., 2013) and prevalence of PCOS (Teede et al., 2013). Weight management (prevention of weight gain, achieving modest weight loss and maintenance of reduced weight) is thus recommended in evidence-based guidelines as first-line treatment for PCOS (Teede et al., 2011). The relationship between excess weight and PCOS is further complicated by a potential bidirectional relationship, with PCOS associated with an increased prevalence of excess weight (Lim et al., 2012).
The adverse impact of excess weight and the potential predisposition to weight gain have led to intense interest in the optimal dietary approach both to improve the features of PCOS and to achieve optimal weight management. While the majority of clinicians recommend lifestyle management (Cussons et al., 2005; Sharma et al., 2010), women with PCOS report they rarely receive lifestyle advice (Gibson-Helm et al., 2014). Some women with PCOS may seek advice from a dietitian which ranges from standard population weight loss recommendations to tailored advice (Jeanes et al., 2009; Moran et al., 2009). However, a recent survey reported that only half of dietitians provided specific information on diet type (Sharma et al., 2010). Other research also highlights that women with PCOS feel dietary advice is broad and inadequate (Humphreys and Costarelli, 2008). In this context, women with PCOS may be more likely to seek information from both evidence-based and non-evidence-based sources such as books, peers, information resources or the internet (Humphreys and Costarelli, 2008; Jeanes et al., 2009). Non-evidence-based strategies (‘alternative’ strategies) can include fad diets, smoking, fasting or laxative use (Timperio et al., 2000; Hayes and Napolitano, 2012), which may be associated with inadequate dietary intake (Neumark-Sztainer et al., 1996, 2000). This is of particular concern in PCOS, where optimizing diet and physical activity are paramount for improving reproductive, metabolic and psychological health, independent of weight management (Teede et al., 2011).
There is limited literature examining weight management practices in PCOS and none in community-based women, or women not recruited from clinical populations, in comparison with women without PCOS or in association with diet or physical activity. The aim of this study was to examine weight management practices in a population sample of women with and without PCOS, and to relate these to diet and physical activity among women with PCOS.
Materials and Methods
Study population
This study is based on the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH), a longitudinal population-based study of four age cohorts of Australian women. For this study, women were recruited from the young cohort born in 1973–1978 and aged 18–23 years at ALSWH commencement (in 1996). Women were randomly selected from the national health insurance scheme (Medicare) database with intentional over-sampling from rural and remote areas (Dobson et al., 2015). Further methodological details have been reported elsewhere (Brown et al., 1998; Lee, 2001). The Human Research Ethics Committees of the University of Newcastle, Australia and the University of Queensland, Australia approved the study and informed written consent was obtained from each participant.

Flow diagram of participant inclusion in a study of weight management practices associated with PCOS.
ALSWH, Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.
Anthropometric and demographic variables
Self-reported height, weight, BMI and waist circumference were reported, with overweight and obesity defined by the World Health Organization criteria (<18.5 kg/m2 for underweight, 18.5–<25 kg/m2 for healthy weight, 25–<30 kg/m2 for overweight, ≥30 kg/m2 for obesity). Demographic variables including parity, education, occupation and income were collected at Survey 5 and area of residence and country of birth were measured at Survey 1.
Dietary intake
Self-reported diet data were collected from the Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies (DQES) Version 2, an FFQ developed by The Cancer Council of Victoria previously validated in young to middle-aged (16–48 years) Australian women in comparison with a 7-day weighed food record (Hodge et al., 2000). The dietary guidelines index (DGI) (McNaughton et al., 2009) was used to assess diet quality. The DGI reflects compliance with Dietary Guidelines for Australian adults and the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating and comprises dietary indicators for the consumption of five core food groups (vegetables, fruits, cereals, meat and alternatives and dairy) and discretionary foods (foods high in energy, saturated fat, added sugars, added salt or alcohol and low in fibre) and national recommendations for saturated fat and added sugars. Each component was scored on a scale of 0–10, with 10 indicating an optimal intake. The total score was the sum of 13 indicators, with the DGI having a possible range of 0–130 and a higher score indicating increased compliance with the dietary guidelines. Participants who had incomplete FFQ data (>10% of items with missing responses) or those who reported a daily energy intake of >14 700 kJ/day or <2100 kJ/day were excluded.
Physical activity
Data were collected on the frequency and duration of a variety of leisure-time and transport activities such as commuting including walking briskly, moderate-intensity leisure-time physical activity and vigorous-intensity leisure-time physical activity in the last week for activities lasting 10 min or more. Physical activity was calculated as the sum of the products of total weekly minutes in each of the three categories of physical activity and the metabolic equivalent value (MET) assigned to each category: [(walking minutes × 3.0) + (moderate-intensity physical activity minutes × 4.0) + (vigorous-intensity physical activity minutes × 7.5)]. Four ordered physical activity levels were created: 0–<40 MET·min/week was defined as nil/sedentary (Level 1); 40–<600 MET·min/week as low (Level 2); 600–<1200 MET·min/week as moderate (Level 3); and ≥1200 MET·min/week as high level of physical activity (Level 4). The moderate category (Level 3) is commensurate with the lower end of the range of physical activity recommended in the current Australian guidelines (at least 150 min per week moderate-intensity physical activity, or equivalent), and the high category threshold (Level 4) is commensurate with the upper end of the recommended range (300 min of moderate intensity per week, or equivalent) (Brown et al., 2012). Outliers were truncated at 28 h/week for total physical activity.
Weight management practices
Weight management practices were assessed as previously described (Madigan et al., 2015) (Table I). Participants were asked to indicate whether in the last 12 months they had used certain methods to control their weight or shape with responses of yes or no provided. Weight control practices were classified into two groups: healthy lifestyle-related practices [exercise, commercial weight loss programs, meal replacements or slimming products, reducing meal or snack size, cutting down on fats and/or sugars, following a low glycaemic index (GI) diet or following a diet book diet (e.g. Atkins, Zone, CSIRO diet, Liver Cleansing diet)] or non-lifestyle-related alternative practices (use of laxatives, diuretics or diet pills, fasting or smoking). Women were defined as following a healthy or alternative weight management practice if they followed any of the practices for that category.
Have you used any of these methods to lose weight or to control your weight or shape in the last 12 months? . |
---|
Commercial weight loss programs (e.g. Weight Watchers®, Lite n’ Easy®, Sureslim®, Jenny Craig®) |
Meal replacements or slimming products (e.g. OPTIFAST®, Herbalife®) |
Exercise |
Cut down on the size of meals or between meal snacks |
Cut down on fats (low fat) and/or sugars |
Low glycaemic index diet |
Diet book diets (e.g. Atkins, Zone, CSIRO diet, Liver Cleansing diet) |
Laxatives, diuretics or diet pills (e.g. orlistat or sibutramine) |
Fasting |
Smoking |
Have you used any of these methods to lose weight or to control your weight or shape in the last 12 months? . |
---|
Commercial weight loss programs (e.g. Weight Watchers®, Lite n’ Easy®, Sureslim®, Jenny Craig®) |
Meal replacements or slimming products (e.g. OPTIFAST®, Herbalife®) |
Exercise |
Cut down on the size of meals or between meal snacks |
Cut down on fats (low fat) and/or sugars |
Low glycaemic index diet |
Diet book diets (e.g. Atkins, Zone, CSIRO diet, Liver Cleansing diet) |
Laxatives, diuretics or diet pills (e.g. orlistat or sibutramine) |
Fasting |
Smoking |
Have you used any of these methods to lose weight or to control your weight or shape in the last 12 months? . |
---|
Commercial weight loss programs (e.g. Weight Watchers®, Lite n’ Easy®, Sureslim®, Jenny Craig®) |
Meal replacements or slimming products (e.g. OPTIFAST®, Herbalife®) |
Exercise |
Cut down on the size of meals or between meal snacks |
Cut down on fats (low fat) and/or sugars |
Low glycaemic index diet |
Diet book diets (e.g. Atkins, Zone, CSIRO diet, Liver Cleansing diet) |
Laxatives, diuretics or diet pills (e.g. orlistat or sibutramine) |
Fasting |
Smoking |
Have you used any of these methods to lose weight or to control your weight or shape in the last 12 months? . |
---|
Commercial weight loss programs (e.g. Weight Watchers®, Lite n’ Easy®, Sureslim®, Jenny Craig®) |
Meal replacements or slimming products (e.g. OPTIFAST®, Herbalife®) |
Exercise |
Cut down on the size of meals or between meal snacks |
Cut down on fats (low fat) and/or sugars |
Low glycaemic index diet |
Diet book diets (e.g. Atkins, Zone, CSIRO diet, Liver Cleansing diet) |
Laxatives, diuretics or diet pills (e.g. orlistat or sibutramine) |
Fasting |
Smoking |
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 13 (StataCorp, 146 College Station, TX, USA). Frequencies and descriptive statistics were expressed as n (%) and means (SEM), respectively. All reported P-values were two tailed, and P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant for all analyses, with the exception of the association of weight management practices and dietary intake or physical activity. To allow for increased Type I error rates associated with multiple primary outcomes, a P-value of <0.005 was accepted as being significant based on Bonferroni adjustment (0.05/10 adjusting for 10 outcomes). Comparisons between women with and without PCOS were performed by independent Student's t-test (continuous variables) and chi-square test (categorical variables). Logistic regressions were used to assess the association between weight management practices and PCOS, and linear regression analyses were used to assess the association between weight management practices and diet or physical activity with adjustment for age, BMI, marital status, education, occupation, income and country of birth. Models were constructed to avoid collinearity and assessed for standard assumptions. Analyses were conducted using survey commands weighted by area of residence to adjust for deliberate over-sampling in rural and remote areas. The response rate for each outcome is listed in Supplementary Table SI.
Results
Participant characteristics
Participant characteristics are reported in Table II. As previously reported, women with PCOS had a higher BMI, weight and waist circumference, were younger and more likely to not have children than women without PCOS (Teede et al., 2013; Moran et al., 2015). Women with PCOS had higher energy intake, DGI and fibre intake and lower GI with no evidence for differences in macronutrient intake, glycaemic load, physical activity or the proportion meeting physical activity guideline recommendations, smoking or alcohol, compared with women without PCOS.
. | All§, n = 8200 . | PCOS, n = 556 . | Non-PCOS, n = 7211 . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristics | ||||
Age (years)** | 33.7 ± 1.5 | 33.6 ± 1.4 | 33.7 ± 1.5 | 0.008 |
BMI (kg/m2)** | 25.5 ± 5.9 | 28.2 ± 7.4 | 25.4 ± 5.7 | <0.001 |
BMI (WHO categories) | <0.001 | |||
Underweight | 205 (2.6) | 10 (1.9) | 190 (2.7) | |
Healthy weight | 4019 (52.6) | 208 (38.9) | 3736 (53.5) | |
Overweight | 1926 (25.2) | 122 (22.8) | 1776 (25.4) | |
Obese | 1484 (19.4) | 195 (36.4) | 1277 (18.3) | |
Weight (kg)* | 70.6 ± 0.20 | 77.4 ± 0.97 | 70.1 ± 0.20 | <0.001 |
Waist circumference (cm)* | 86.0 ± 0.20 | 90.7 ± 0.90 | 85.6 ± 0.20 | <0.001 |
Personal income† (Australian $) | 0.459 | |||
No income | 707 (9.7) | 54 (10.6) | 641 (9.7) | |
Low (>$0–$36 399) | 2965 (40.8) | 200 (39.1) | 2725 (41.0) | |
Medium ($36 400–$77 999) | 2556 (35.2) | 171 (33.5) | 2342 (35.3) | |
High (>$78 000) | 1041 (14.3) | 86 (16.8) | 934 (14.1) | |
Highest qualification† | 0.633 | |||
No formal qual./year 10/12 equiv.†† | 1606 (20.8) | 103 (19.1) | 1475 (20.9) | |
Trade/diploma | 2051 (26.5) | 142 (26.3) | 1879 (26.6) | |
Degree or higher | 4077 (52.7) | 295 (54.6) | 3715 (52.6) | |
Occupation† | 0.901 | |||
Professional | 3374 (43.5) | 247 (45.5) | 3063 (43.2) | |
Associate professional | 1408 (18.2) | 94 (17.3) | 1299 (18.3) | |
Clerical trade | 1336 (17.2) | 93 (17.1) | 1218 (17.1) | |
No paid job | 1635 (21.1) | 109 (20.1) | 1505 (21.2) | |
Marital status† | 0.670 | |||
Married | 4910 (62.4) | 349 (63.0) | 4481 (62.3) | |
De facto | 1202 (15.3) | 78 (14.1) | 1101 (15.3) | |
Separated/divorced | 405 (5.1) | 26 (4.7) | 374 (5.2) | |
Widowed | 18 (0.02) | 0 (0) | 18 (0.03) | |
Never married | 1339 (17.0) | 101 (18.2) | 1218 (16.9) | |
Number of children† | 0.042 | |||
0 | 2863 (43.2) | 232 (41.7) | 2585 (35.8) | |
1 | 1543 (20.2) | 113 (20.3) | 1398 (19.4) | |
2–3 | 3196 (33.8) | 190 (34.2) | 2962 (41.1) | |
≥4 | 294 (3.7) | 21 (3.8) | 266 (3.7) | |
Country of birth† | 0.318 | |||
Oceania | 7433 (94.7) | 515 (93.1) | 6796 (94.8) | |
Europe | 206 (2.6) | 18 (3.3) | 184 (2.6) | |
African | 60 (0.8) | 7 (1.3) | 53 (0.7) | |
Asian | 120 (1.5) | 11 (2.0) | 107 (1.5) | |
Americas | 28 (0.4) | 2 (0.4) | 26 (0.4) | |
Pregnant | 785 (10.1) | 62 (11.3) | 712 (10.0) | 0.365 |
Health behaviours | ||||
Smoking status† | 0.502 | |||
Never smoker | 4731 (60.0) | 330 (59.5) | 4321 (60.0) | |
Ex-smoker | 2033 (25.8) | 152 (27.4) | 1854 (25.8) | |
Smoke <10 cigarettes/day | 526 (6.7) | 32 (5.8) | 482 (6.7) | |
Smoke 10–19 cigarettes/day | 378 (4.8) | 30 (5.4) | 341 (4.7) | |
Smoke ≥20 cigarettes/day | 212 (2.7) | 11 (2.0) | 199 (2.8) | |
Alcohol (g)* | 9.3 ± 0.16 | 8.2 ± 0.57 | 9.4 ± 0.17 | 0.068 |
Energy (kJ)* | 6742.3 ± 27.3 | 7016.6 ± 111.1 | 6719.3 ± 28.3 | 0.009 |
DGI* | 87.2 ± 0.13 | 88.9 ± 0.50 | 87.1 ± 0.14 | <0.001 |
Glycaemic load* | 86.9 ± 0.41 | 89.5 ± 1.6 | 86.7 ± 0.42 | 0.107 |
Glycaemic index* | 59.6 ± 0.05 | 50.2 ± 0.18 | 50.7 ± 0.05 | 0.014 |
Fibre (g)* | 19.2 ± 0.09 | 20.4 ± 0.37 | 19.1 ± 0.09 | 0.002 |
Fat (%)* | 36.8 ± 0.06 | 36.7 ± 0.24 | 36.8 ± 0.06 | 0.673 |
Saturated fat (%)* | 15.3 ± 0.04 | 15.1 ± 0.14 | 15.3 ± 0.04 | 0.210 |
Protein (%)* | 20.9 ± 0.04 | 2.1 ± 0.15 | 20.9 ± 0.04 | 0.230 |
Carbohydrate (%)* | 40.5 ± 0.07 | 40.4 ± 0.28 | 40.5 ± 0.07 | 0.763 |
Physical activity (METs·min/week)* | 822.2 ± 11.2 | 786.0 ± 39.9 | 825.0 ± 11.8 | 0.348 |
Physical activity status | 0.704 | |||
Sedentary physical activity | 1039 (13.6) | 78 (14.5) | 950 (13.6) | |
Low physical activity | 3046 (39.8) | 217 (40.4) | 2775 (40.0) | |
Moderate physical activity | 1703 (22.3) | 118 (22.0) | 1550 (22.2) | |
High physical activity | 1864 (24.4) | 124 (23.1) | 1718 (24.6) | |
Meeting physical activity guidelines | 3567 (46.6) | 242 (45.1) | 3268 (46.7) | 0.293 |
. | All§, n = 8200 . | PCOS, n = 556 . | Non-PCOS, n = 7211 . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristics | ||||
Age (years)** | 33.7 ± 1.5 | 33.6 ± 1.4 | 33.7 ± 1.5 | 0.008 |
BMI (kg/m2)** | 25.5 ± 5.9 | 28.2 ± 7.4 | 25.4 ± 5.7 | <0.001 |
BMI (WHO categories) | <0.001 | |||
Underweight | 205 (2.6) | 10 (1.9) | 190 (2.7) | |
Healthy weight | 4019 (52.6) | 208 (38.9) | 3736 (53.5) | |
Overweight | 1926 (25.2) | 122 (22.8) | 1776 (25.4) | |
Obese | 1484 (19.4) | 195 (36.4) | 1277 (18.3) | |
Weight (kg)* | 70.6 ± 0.20 | 77.4 ± 0.97 | 70.1 ± 0.20 | <0.001 |
Waist circumference (cm)* | 86.0 ± 0.20 | 90.7 ± 0.90 | 85.6 ± 0.20 | <0.001 |
Personal income† (Australian $) | 0.459 | |||
No income | 707 (9.7) | 54 (10.6) | 641 (9.7) | |
Low (>$0–$36 399) | 2965 (40.8) | 200 (39.1) | 2725 (41.0) | |
Medium ($36 400–$77 999) | 2556 (35.2) | 171 (33.5) | 2342 (35.3) | |
High (>$78 000) | 1041 (14.3) | 86 (16.8) | 934 (14.1) | |
Highest qualification† | 0.633 | |||
No formal qual./year 10/12 equiv.†† | 1606 (20.8) | 103 (19.1) | 1475 (20.9) | |
Trade/diploma | 2051 (26.5) | 142 (26.3) | 1879 (26.6) | |
Degree or higher | 4077 (52.7) | 295 (54.6) | 3715 (52.6) | |
Occupation† | 0.901 | |||
Professional | 3374 (43.5) | 247 (45.5) | 3063 (43.2) | |
Associate professional | 1408 (18.2) | 94 (17.3) | 1299 (18.3) | |
Clerical trade | 1336 (17.2) | 93 (17.1) | 1218 (17.1) | |
No paid job | 1635 (21.1) | 109 (20.1) | 1505 (21.2) | |
Marital status† | 0.670 | |||
Married | 4910 (62.4) | 349 (63.0) | 4481 (62.3) | |
De facto | 1202 (15.3) | 78 (14.1) | 1101 (15.3) | |
Separated/divorced | 405 (5.1) | 26 (4.7) | 374 (5.2) | |
Widowed | 18 (0.02) | 0 (0) | 18 (0.03) | |
Never married | 1339 (17.0) | 101 (18.2) | 1218 (16.9) | |
Number of children† | 0.042 | |||
0 | 2863 (43.2) | 232 (41.7) | 2585 (35.8) | |
1 | 1543 (20.2) | 113 (20.3) | 1398 (19.4) | |
2–3 | 3196 (33.8) | 190 (34.2) | 2962 (41.1) | |
≥4 | 294 (3.7) | 21 (3.8) | 266 (3.7) | |
Country of birth† | 0.318 | |||
Oceania | 7433 (94.7) | 515 (93.1) | 6796 (94.8) | |
Europe | 206 (2.6) | 18 (3.3) | 184 (2.6) | |
African | 60 (0.8) | 7 (1.3) | 53 (0.7) | |
Asian | 120 (1.5) | 11 (2.0) | 107 (1.5) | |
Americas | 28 (0.4) | 2 (0.4) | 26 (0.4) | |
Pregnant | 785 (10.1) | 62 (11.3) | 712 (10.0) | 0.365 |
Health behaviours | ||||
Smoking status† | 0.502 | |||
Never smoker | 4731 (60.0) | 330 (59.5) | 4321 (60.0) | |
Ex-smoker | 2033 (25.8) | 152 (27.4) | 1854 (25.8) | |
Smoke <10 cigarettes/day | 526 (6.7) | 32 (5.8) | 482 (6.7) | |
Smoke 10–19 cigarettes/day | 378 (4.8) | 30 (5.4) | 341 (4.7) | |
Smoke ≥20 cigarettes/day | 212 (2.7) | 11 (2.0) | 199 (2.8) | |
Alcohol (g)* | 9.3 ± 0.16 | 8.2 ± 0.57 | 9.4 ± 0.17 | 0.068 |
Energy (kJ)* | 6742.3 ± 27.3 | 7016.6 ± 111.1 | 6719.3 ± 28.3 | 0.009 |
DGI* | 87.2 ± 0.13 | 88.9 ± 0.50 | 87.1 ± 0.14 | <0.001 |
Glycaemic load* | 86.9 ± 0.41 | 89.5 ± 1.6 | 86.7 ± 0.42 | 0.107 |
Glycaemic index* | 59.6 ± 0.05 | 50.2 ± 0.18 | 50.7 ± 0.05 | 0.014 |
Fibre (g)* | 19.2 ± 0.09 | 20.4 ± 0.37 | 19.1 ± 0.09 | 0.002 |
Fat (%)* | 36.8 ± 0.06 | 36.7 ± 0.24 | 36.8 ± 0.06 | 0.673 |
Saturated fat (%)* | 15.3 ± 0.04 | 15.1 ± 0.14 | 15.3 ± 0.04 | 0.210 |
Protein (%)* | 20.9 ± 0.04 | 2.1 ± 0.15 | 20.9 ± 0.04 | 0.230 |
Carbohydrate (%)* | 40.5 ± 0.07 | 40.4 ± 0.28 | 40.5 ± 0.07 | 0.763 |
Physical activity (METs·min/week)* | 822.2 ± 11.2 | 786.0 ± 39.9 | 825.0 ± 11.8 | 0.348 |
Physical activity status | 0.704 | |||
Sedentary physical activity | 1039 (13.6) | 78 (14.5) | 950 (13.6) | |
Low physical activity | 3046 (39.8) | 217 (40.4) | 2775 (40.0) | |
Moderate physical activity | 1703 (22.3) | 118 (22.0) | 1550 (22.2) | |
High physical activity | 1864 (24.4) | 124 (23.1) | 1718 (24.6) | |
Meeting physical activity guidelines | 3567 (46.6) | 242 (45.1) | 3268 (46.7) | 0.293 |
Data were analysed by independent Student's t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. Bolded values represent significant associations.
DGI, dietary guidelines index; MET, metabolic equivalent values; WHO, World Health Organization.
§Relates to the entire cohort of women from Survey 5 of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH). Of these, 7767 were eligible for this specific substudy.
*Values represent mean (SEM).
**Values represent mean (SD). †Values represent n (%).
††Year 12 or equivalent (e.g. Higher School Certificate).
. | All§, n = 8200 . | PCOS, n = 556 . | Non-PCOS, n = 7211 . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristics | ||||
Age (years)** | 33.7 ± 1.5 | 33.6 ± 1.4 | 33.7 ± 1.5 | 0.008 |
BMI (kg/m2)** | 25.5 ± 5.9 | 28.2 ± 7.4 | 25.4 ± 5.7 | <0.001 |
BMI (WHO categories) | <0.001 | |||
Underweight | 205 (2.6) | 10 (1.9) | 190 (2.7) | |
Healthy weight | 4019 (52.6) | 208 (38.9) | 3736 (53.5) | |
Overweight | 1926 (25.2) | 122 (22.8) | 1776 (25.4) | |
Obese | 1484 (19.4) | 195 (36.4) | 1277 (18.3) | |
Weight (kg)* | 70.6 ± 0.20 | 77.4 ± 0.97 | 70.1 ± 0.20 | <0.001 |
Waist circumference (cm)* | 86.0 ± 0.20 | 90.7 ± 0.90 | 85.6 ± 0.20 | <0.001 |
Personal income† (Australian $) | 0.459 | |||
No income | 707 (9.7) | 54 (10.6) | 641 (9.7) | |
Low (>$0–$36 399) | 2965 (40.8) | 200 (39.1) | 2725 (41.0) | |
Medium ($36 400–$77 999) | 2556 (35.2) | 171 (33.5) | 2342 (35.3) | |
High (>$78 000) | 1041 (14.3) | 86 (16.8) | 934 (14.1) | |
Highest qualification† | 0.633 | |||
No formal qual./year 10/12 equiv.†† | 1606 (20.8) | 103 (19.1) | 1475 (20.9) | |
Trade/diploma | 2051 (26.5) | 142 (26.3) | 1879 (26.6) | |
Degree or higher | 4077 (52.7) | 295 (54.6) | 3715 (52.6) | |
Occupation† | 0.901 | |||
Professional | 3374 (43.5) | 247 (45.5) | 3063 (43.2) | |
Associate professional | 1408 (18.2) | 94 (17.3) | 1299 (18.3) | |
Clerical trade | 1336 (17.2) | 93 (17.1) | 1218 (17.1) | |
No paid job | 1635 (21.1) | 109 (20.1) | 1505 (21.2) | |
Marital status† | 0.670 | |||
Married | 4910 (62.4) | 349 (63.0) | 4481 (62.3) | |
De facto | 1202 (15.3) | 78 (14.1) | 1101 (15.3) | |
Separated/divorced | 405 (5.1) | 26 (4.7) | 374 (5.2) | |
Widowed | 18 (0.02) | 0 (0) | 18 (0.03) | |
Never married | 1339 (17.0) | 101 (18.2) | 1218 (16.9) | |
Number of children† | 0.042 | |||
0 | 2863 (43.2) | 232 (41.7) | 2585 (35.8) | |
1 | 1543 (20.2) | 113 (20.3) | 1398 (19.4) | |
2–3 | 3196 (33.8) | 190 (34.2) | 2962 (41.1) | |
≥4 | 294 (3.7) | 21 (3.8) | 266 (3.7) | |
Country of birth† | 0.318 | |||
Oceania | 7433 (94.7) | 515 (93.1) | 6796 (94.8) | |
Europe | 206 (2.6) | 18 (3.3) | 184 (2.6) | |
African | 60 (0.8) | 7 (1.3) | 53 (0.7) | |
Asian | 120 (1.5) | 11 (2.0) | 107 (1.5) | |
Americas | 28 (0.4) | 2 (0.4) | 26 (0.4) | |
Pregnant | 785 (10.1) | 62 (11.3) | 712 (10.0) | 0.365 |
Health behaviours | ||||
Smoking status† | 0.502 | |||
Never smoker | 4731 (60.0) | 330 (59.5) | 4321 (60.0) | |
Ex-smoker | 2033 (25.8) | 152 (27.4) | 1854 (25.8) | |
Smoke <10 cigarettes/day | 526 (6.7) | 32 (5.8) | 482 (6.7) | |
Smoke 10–19 cigarettes/day | 378 (4.8) | 30 (5.4) | 341 (4.7) | |
Smoke ≥20 cigarettes/day | 212 (2.7) | 11 (2.0) | 199 (2.8) | |
Alcohol (g)* | 9.3 ± 0.16 | 8.2 ± 0.57 | 9.4 ± 0.17 | 0.068 |
Energy (kJ)* | 6742.3 ± 27.3 | 7016.6 ± 111.1 | 6719.3 ± 28.3 | 0.009 |
DGI* | 87.2 ± 0.13 | 88.9 ± 0.50 | 87.1 ± 0.14 | <0.001 |
Glycaemic load* | 86.9 ± 0.41 | 89.5 ± 1.6 | 86.7 ± 0.42 | 0.107 |
Glycaemic index* | 59.6 ± 0.05 | 50.2 ± 0.18 | 50.7 ± 0.05 | 0.014 |
Fibre (g)* | 19.2 ± 0.09 | 20.4 ± 0.37 | 19.1 ± 0.09 | 0.002 |
Fat (%)* | 36.8 ± 0.06 | 36.7 ± 0.24 | 36.8 ± 0.06 | 0.673 |
Saturated fat (%)* | 15.3 ± 0.04 | 15.1 ± 0.14 | 15.3 ± 0.04 | 0.210 |
Protein (%)* | 20.9 ± 0.04 | 2.1 ± 0.15 | 20.9 ± 0.04 | 0.230 |
Carbohydrate (%)* | 40.5 ± 0.07 | 40.4 ± 0.28 | 40.5 ± 0.07 | 0.763 |
Physical activity (METs·min/week)* | 822.2 ± 11.2 | 786.0 ± 39.9 | 825.0 ± 11.8 | 0.348 |
Physical activity status | 0.704 | |||
Sedentary physical activity | 1039 (13.6) | 78 (14.5) | 950 (13.6) | |
Low physical activity | 3046 (39.8) | 217 (40.4) | 2775 (40.0) | |
Moderate physical activity | 1703 (22.3) | 118 (22.0) | 1550 (22.2) | |
High physical activity | 1864 (24.4) | 124 (23.1) | 1718 (24.6) | |
Meeting physical activity guidelines | 3567 (46.6) | 242 (45.1) | 3268 (46.7) | 0.293 |
. | All§, n = 8200 . | PCOS, n = 556 . | Non-PCOS, n = 7211 . | P . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristics | ||||
Age (years)** | 33.7 ± 1.5 | 33.6 ± 1.4 | 33.7 ± 1.5 | 0.008 |
BMI (kg/m2)** | 25.5 ± 5.9 | 28.2 ± 7.4 | 25.4 ± 5.7 | <0.001 |
BMI (WHO categories) | <0.001 | |||
Underweight | 205 (2.6) | 10 (1.9) | 190 (2.7) | |
Healthy weight | 4019 (52.6) | 208 (38.9) | 3736 (53.5) | |
Overweight | 1926 (25.2) | 122 (22.8) | 1776 (25.4) | |
Obese | 1484 (19.4) | 195 (36.4) | 1277 (18.3) | |
Weight (kg)* | 70.6 ± 0.20 | 77.4 ± 0.97 | 70.1 ± 0.20 | <0.001 |
Waist circumference (cm)* | 86.0 ± 0.20 | 90.7 ± 0.90 | 85.6 ± 0.20 | <0.001 |
Personal income† (Australian $) | 0.459 | |||
No income | 707 (9.7) | 54 (10.6) | 641 (9.7) | |
Low (>$0–$36 399) | 2965 (40.8) | 200 (39.1) | 2725 (41.0) | |
Medium ($36 400–$77 999) | 2556 (35.2) | 171 (33.5) | 2342 (35.3) | |
High (>$78 000) | 1041 (14.3) | 86 (16.8) | 934 (14.1) | |
Highest qualification† | 0.633 | |||
No formal qual./year 10/12 equiv.†† | 1606 (20.8) | 103 (19.1) | 1475 (20.9) | |
Trade/diploma | 2051 (26.5) | 142 (26.3) | 1879 (26.6) | |
Degree or higher | 4077 (52.7) | 295 (54.6) | 3715 (52.6) | |
Occupation† | 0.901 | |||
Professional | 3374 (43.5) | 247 (45.5) | 3063 (43.2) | |
Associate professional | 1408 (18.2) | 94 (17.3) | 1299 (18.3) | |
Clerical trade | 1336 (17.2) | 93 (17.1) | 1218 (17.1) | |
No paid job | 1635 (21.1) | 109 (20.1) | 1505 (21.2) | |
Marital status† | 0.670 | |||
Married | 4910 (62.4) | 349 (63.0) | 4481 (62.3) | |
De facto | 1202 (15.3) | 78 (14.1) | 1101 (15.3) | |
Separated/divorced | 405 (5.1) | 26 (4.7) | 374 (5.2) | |
Widowed | 18 (0.02) | 0 (0) | 18 (0.03) | |
Never married | 1339 (17.0) | 101 (18.2) | 1218 (16.9) | |
Number of children† | 0.042 | |||
0 | 2863 (43.2) | 232 (41.7) | 2585 (35.8) | |
1 | 1543 (20.2) | 113 (20.3) | 1398 (19.4) | |
2–3 | 3196 (33.8) | 190 (34.2) | 2962 (41.1) | |
≥4 | 294 (3.7) | 21 (3.8) | 266 (3.7) | |
Country of birth† | 0.318 | |||
Oceania | 7433 (94.7) | 515 (93.1) | 6796 (94.8) | |
Europe | 206 (2.6) | 18 (3.3) | 184 (2.6) | |
African | 60 (0.8) | 7 (1.3) | 53 (0.7) | |
Asian | 120 (1.5) | 11 (2.0) | 107 (1.5) | |
Americas | 28 (0.4) | 2 (0.4) | 26 (0.4) | |
Pregnant | 785 (10.1) | 62 (11.3) | 712 (10.0) | 0.365 |
Health behaviours | ||||
Smoking status† | 0.502 | |||
Never smoker | 4731 (60.0) | 330 (59.5) | 4321 (60.0) | |
Ex-smoker | 2033 (25.8) | 152 (27.4) | 1854 (25.8) | |
Smoke <10 cigarettes/day | 526 (6.7) | 32 (5.8) | 482 (6.7) | |
Smoke 10–19 cigarettes/day | 378 (4.8) | 30 (5.4) | 341 (4.7) | |
Smoke ≥20 cigarettes/day | 212 (2.7) | 11 (2.0) | 199 (2.8) | |
Alcohol (g)* | 9.3 ± 0.16 | 8.2 ± 0.57 | 9.4 ± 0.17 | 0.068 |
Energy (kJ)* | 6742.3 ± 27.3 | 7016.6 ± 111.1 | 6719.3 ± 28.3 | 0.009 |
DGI* | 87.2 ± 0.13 | 88.9 ± 0.50 | 87.1 ± 0.14 | <0.001 |
Glycaemic load* | 86.9 ± 0.41 | 89.5 ± 1.6 | 86.7 ± 0.42 | 0.107 |
Glycaemic index* | 59.6 ± 0.05 | 50.2 ± 0.18 | 50.7 ± 0.05 | 0.014 |
Fibre (g)* | 19.2 ± 0.09 | 20.4 ± 0.37 | 19.1 ± 0.09 | 0.002 |
Fat (%)* | 36.8 ± 0.06 | 36.7 ± 0.24 | 36.8 ± 0.06 | 0.673 |
Saturated fat (%)* | 15.3 ± 0.04 | 15.1 ± 0.14 | 15.3 ± 0.04 | 0.210 |
Protein (%)* | 20.9 ± 0.04 | 2.1 ± 0.15 | 20.9 ± 0.04 | 0.230 |
Carbohydrate (%)* | 40.5 ± 0.07 | 40.4 ± 0.28 | 40.5 ± 0.07 | 0.763 |
Physical activity (METs·min/week)* | 822.2 ± 11.2 | 786.0 ± 39.9 | 825.0 ± 11.8 | 0.348 |
Physical activity status | 0.704 | |||
Sedentary physical activity | 1039 (13.6) | 78 (14.5) | 950 (13.6) | |
Low physical activity | 3046 (39.8) | 217 (40.4) | 2775 (40.0) | |
Moderate physical activity | 1703 (22.3) | 118 (22.0) | 1550 (22.2) | |
High physical activity | 1864 (24.4) | 124 (23.1) | 1718 (24.6) | |
Meeting physical activity guidelines | 3567 (46.6) | 242 (45.1) | 3268 (46.7) | 0.293 |
Data were analysed by independent Student's t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. Bolded values represent significant associations.
DGI, dietary guidelines index; MET, metabolic equivalent values; WHO, World Health Organization.
§Relates to the entire cohort of women from Survey 5 of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH). Of these, 7767 were eligible for this specific substudy.
*Values represent mean (SEM).
**Values represent mean (SD). †Values represent n (%).
††Year 12 or equivalent (e.g. Higher School Certificate).
Weight management practices
Weight management practices followed by women with and without PCOS are reported in Table III. In unadjusted analyses, women with PCOS were more likely to be following the weight management practices of using meal replacements, reducing meal or snack size, reducing fat or sugar, following a low GI diet, following a diet book diet, using laxatives, diuretics or diet pills, smoking or following any healthy or alternative weight management practices. In adjusted analyses, these relationships were maintained for reducing meal or snack size, reducing fat or sugar, following a low GI diet, smoking and for the overall score for alternative practices.
Outcome . | PCOS . | Non-PCOS . | OR unadjusted . | OR adjusteda . | OR adjustedb . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exercise | 475/556 (85.4%) | 5901/7188 (82.1%) | 1.20 (0.93, 1.56) P = 0.163 | 1.06 (0.81, 1.38) P = 0.679 | 1.06 (0.79, 1.42) P = 0.717 |
Commercial weight loss programs | 94/555 (16.9%) | 1001/7202 (13.9%) | 1.19 (0.92, 1.53) P = 0.182 | 0.91 (0.69, 1.19) P = 0.472 | 0.91 (0.68, 1.21) P = 0.512 |
Meal replacements | 116/556 (20.9%) | 1067/7189 (14.8%) | 1.54 (1.22, 1.94)P< 0.001 | 1.18 (0.92, 1.52) P = 0.189 | 1.23 (0.93, 1.61) P = 0.142 |
Reduce meal or snack size | 447/554 (80.7%) | 5294/7199 (73.4%) | 1.60 (1.26, 2.02)P< 0.001 | 1.34 (1.05, 1.71) P = 0.018 | 1.50 (1.14, 1.96)P = 0.003 |
Reduce fat or sugar | 429/556 (77.2%) | 4952/7197 (68.8%) | 1.49 (1.20, 1.86)P < 0.001 | 1.26 (1.01, 1.58) P = 0.044 | 1.32 (1.03, 1.69)P = 0.027 |
Low GI diet | 187/555 (33.7%) | 980/7181 (13.6%) | 3.21 (2.62, 3.93)P < 0.001 | 2.87 (2.33, 3.54) P < 0.001 | 2.88 (2.30, 3.59)P < 0.001 |
Diet book diets | 64/555 (11.5%) | 593/7187 (8.3%) | 1.47 (1.10, 1.97)P = 0.010 | 1.23 (0.91, 1.68) P = 0.182 | 1.13 (0.80, 1.58) P = 0.490 |
Laxatives, diuretics or diet pills | 38/517 (6.8%) | 325/7195 (4.5%) | 1.65 (1.14, 2.38)P = 0.008 | 1.33 (0.90, 1.95) P = 0.152 | 1.39 (0.91, 2.11) P = 0.123 |
Fasting | 36/554 (6.5%) | 326/7195 (4.5%) | 1.44 (0.99, 2.11) P = 0.058 | 1.35 (0.91, 2.00) P = 0.138 | 1.48 (0.97, 2.27) P = 0.070 |
Smoking | 34/552 (6.2%) | 299/7193 (4.2%) | 1.59 (1.07, 2.36)P = 0.021 | 1.39 (0.92, 2.09) P = 0.116 | 1.60 (1.02, 2.52)P = 0.043 |
Any healthy practice | 519/556 (93.3%) | 6383/7207 (88.6%) | 1.65 (1.15, 2.37)P = 0.006 | 1.32 (0.92, 1.91) P = 0.135 | 1.34 (0.88, 2.03) P = 0.173 |
Any alternative practice | 77/555 (13.9%) | 718/7199 (10.0%) | 1.55 (1.19, 2.03)P = 0.001 | 1.34 (1.02, 1.78) P = 0.038 | 1.45 (1.07, 1.97)P = 0.017 |
Outcome . | PCOS . | Non-PCOS . | OR unadjusted . | OR adjusteda . | OR adjustedb . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exercise | 475/556 (85.4%) | 5901/7188 (82.1%) | 1.20 (0.93, 1.56) P = 0.163 | 1.06 (0.81, 1.38) P = 0.679 | 1.06 (0.79, 1.42) P = 0.717 |
Commercial weight loss programs | 94/555 (16.9%) | 1001/7202 (13.9%) | 1.19 (0.92, 1.53) P = 0.182 | 0.91 (0.69, 1.19) P = 0.472 | 0.91 (0.68, 1.21) P = 0.512 |
Meal replacements | 116/556 (20.9%) | 1067/7189 (14.8%) | 1.54 (1.22, 1.94)P< 0.001 | 1.18 (0.92, 1.52) P = 0.189 | 1.23 (0.93, 1.61) P = 0.142 |
Reduce meal or snack size | 447/554 (80.7%) | 5294/7199 (73.4%) | 1.60 (1.26, 2.02)P< 0.001 | 1.34 (1.05, 1.71) P = 0.018 | 1.50 (1.14, 1.96)P = 0.003 |
Reduce fat or sugar | 429/556 (77.2%) | 4952/7197 (68.8%) | 1.49 (1.20, 1.86)P < 0.001 | 1.26 (1.01, 1.58) P = 0.044 | 1.32 (1.03, 1.69)P = 0.027 |
Low GI diet | 187/555 (33.7%) | 980/7181 (13.6%) | 3.21 (2.62, 3.93)P < 0.001 | 2.87 (2.33, 3.54) P < 0.001 | 2.88 (2.30, 3.59)P < 0.001 |
Diet book diets | 64/555 (11.5%) | 593/7187 (8.3%) | 1.47 (1.10, 1.97)P = 0.010 | 1.23 (0.91, 1.68) P = 0.182 | 1.13 (0.80, 1.58) P = 0.490 |
Laxatives, diuretics or diet pills | 38/517 (6.8%) | 325/7195 (4.5%) | 1.65 (1.14, 2.38)P = 0.008 | 1.33 (0.90, 1.95) P = 0.152 | 1.39 (0.91, 2.11) P = 0.123 |
Fasting | 36/554 (6.5%) | 326/7195 (4.5%) | 1.44 (0.99, 2.11) P = 0.058 | 1.35 (0.91, 2.00) P = 0.138 | 1.48 (0.97, 2.27) P = 0.070 |
Smoking | 34/552 (6.2%) | 299/7193 (4.2%) | 1.59 (1.07, 2.36)P = 0.021 | 1.39 (0.92, 2.09) P = 0.116 | 1.60 (1.02, 2.52)P = 0.043 |
Any healthy practice | 519/556 (93.3%) | 6383/7207 (88.6%) | 1.65 (1.15, 2.37)P = 0.006 | 1.32 (0.92, 1.91) P = 0.135 | 1.34 (0.88, 2.03) P = 0.173 |
Any alternative practice | 77/555 (13.9%) | 718/7199 (10.0%) | 1.55 (1.19, 2.03)P = 0.001 | 1.34 (1.02, 1.78) P = 0.038 | 1.45 (1.07, 1.97)P = 0.017 |
Data are presented as odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) and were analysed using logistic regression analysis.
aAdjusted for age and BMI.
bAdjusted for age, BMI, marital status, education, occupation, income and country of birth.
Outcome . | PCOS . | Non-PCOS . | OR unadjusted . | OR adjusteda . | OR adjustedb . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exercise | 475/556 (85.4%) | 5901/7188 (82.1%) | 1.20 (0.93, 1.56) P = 0.163 | 1.06 (0.81, 1.38) P = 0.679 | 1.06 (0.79, 1.42) P = 0.717 |
Commercial weight loss programs | 94/555 (16.9%) | 1001/7202 (13.9%) | 1.19 (0.92, 1.53) P = 0.182 | 0.91 (0.69, 1.19) P = 0.472 | 0.91 (0.68, 1.21) P = 0.512 |
Meal replacements | 116/556 (20.9%) | 1067/7189 (14.8%) | 1.54 (1.22, 1.94)P< 0.001 | 1.18 (0.92, 1.52) P = 0.189 | 1.23 (0.93, 1.61) P = 0.142 |
Reduce meal or snack size | 447/554 (80.7%) | 5294/7199 (73.4%) | 1.60 (1.26, 2.02)P< 0.001 | 1.34 (1.05, 1.71) P = 0.018 | 1.50 (1.14, 1.96)P = 0.003 |
Reduce fat or sugar | 429/556 (77.2%) | 4952/7197 (68.8%) | 1.49 (1.20, 1.86)P < 0.001 | 1.26 (1.01, 1.58) P = 0.044 | 1.32 (1.03, 1.69)P = 0.027 |
Low GI diet | 187/555 (33.7%) | 980/7181 (13.6%) | 3.21 (2.62, 3.93)P < 0.001 | 2.87 (2.33, 3.54) P < 0.001 | 2.88 (2.30, 3.59)P < 0.001 |
Diet book diets | 64/555 (11.5%) | 593/7187 (8.3%) | 1.47 (1.10, 1.97)P = 0.010 | 1.23 (0.91, 1.68) P = 0.182 | 1.13 (0.80, 1.58) P = 0.490 |
Laxatives, diuretics or diet pills | 38/517 (6.8%) | 325/7195 (4.5%) | 1.65 (1.14, 2.38)P = 0.008 | 1.33 (0.90, 1.95) P = 0.152 | 1.39 (0.91, 2.11) P = 0.123 |
Fasting | 36/554 (6.5%) | 326/7195 (4.5%) | 1.44 (0.99, 2.11) P = 0.058 | 1.35 (0.91, 2.00) P = 0.138 | 1.48 (0.97, 2.27) P = 0.070 |
Smoking | 34/552 (6.2%) | 299/7193 (4.2%) | 1.59 (1.07, 2.36)P = 0.021 | 1.39 (0.92, 2.09) P = 0.116 | 1.60 (1.02, 2.52)P = 0.043 |
Any healthy practice | 519/556 (93.3%) | 6383/7207 (88.6%) | 1.65 (1.15, 2.37)P = 0.006 | 1.32 (0.92, 1.91) P = 0.135 | 1.34 (0.88, 2.03) P = 0.173 |
Any alternative practice | 77/555 (13.9%) | 718/7199 (10.0%) | 1.55 (1.19, 2.03)P = 0.001 | 1.34 (1.02, 1.78) P = 0.038 | 1.45 (1.07, 1.97)P = 0.017 |
Outcome . | PCOS . | Non-PCOS . | OR unadjusted . | OR adjusteda . | OR adjustedb . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exercise | 475/556 (85.4%) | 5901/7188 (82.1%) | 1.20 (0.93, 1.56) P = 0.163 | 1.06 (0.81, 1.38) P = 0.679 | 1.06 (0.79, 1.42) P = 0.717 |
Commercial weight loss programs | 94/555 (16.9%) | 1001/7202 (13.9%) | 1.19 (0.92, 1.53) P = 0.182 | 0.91 (0.69, 1.19) P = 0.472 | 0.91 (0.68, 1.21) P = 0.512 |
Meal replacements | 116/556 (20.9%) | 1067/7189 (14.8%) | 1.54 (1.22, 1.94)P< 0.001 | 1.18 (0.92, 1.52) P = 0.189 | 1.23 (0.93, 1.61) P = 0.142 |
Reduce meal or snack size | 447/554 (80.7%) | 5294/7199 (73.4%) | 1.60 (1.26, 2.02)P< 0.001 | 1.34 (1.05, 1.71) P = 0.018 | 1.50 (1.14, 1.96)P = 0.003 |
Reduce fat or sugar | 429/556 (77.2%) | 4952/7197 (68.8%) | 1.49 (1.20, 1.86)P < 0.001 | 1.26 (1.01, 1.58) P = 0.044 | 1.32 (1.03, 1.69)P = 0.027 |
Low GI diet | 187/555 (33.7%) | 980/7181 (13.6%) | 3.21 (2.62, 3.93)P < 0.001 | 2.87 (2.33, 3.54) P < 0.001 | 2.88 (2.30, 3.59)P < 0.001 |
Diet book diets | 64/555 (11.5%) | 593/7187 (8.3%) | 1.47 (1.10, 1.97)P = 0.010 | 1.23 (0.91, 1.68) P = 0.182 | 1.13 (0.80, 1.58) P = 0.490 |
Laxatives, diuretics or diet pills | 38/517 (6.8%) | 325/7195 (4.5%) | 1.65 (1.14, 2.38)P = 0.008 | 1.33 (0.90, 1.95) P = 0.152 | 1.39 (0.91, 2.11) P = 0.123 |
Fasting | 36/554 (6.5%) | 326/7195 (4.5%) | 1.44 (0.99, 2.11) P = 0.058 | 1.35 (0.91, 2.00) P = 0.138 | 1.48 (0.97, 2.27) P = 0.070 |
Smoking | 34/552 (6.2%) | 299/7193 (4.2%) | 1.59 (1.07, 2.36)P = 0.021 | 1.39 (0.92, 2.09) P = 0.116 | 1.60 (1.02, 2.52)P = 0.043 |
Any healthy practice | 519/556 (93.3%) | 6383/7207 (88.6%) | 1.65 (1.15, 2.37)P = 0.006 | 1.32 (0.92, 1.91) P = 0.135 | 1.34 (0.88, 2.03) P = 0.173 |
Any alternative practice | 77/555 (13.9%) | 718/7199 (10.0%) | 1.55 (1.19, 2.03)P = 0.001 | 1.34 (1.02, 1.78) P = 0.038 | 1.45 (1.07, 1.97)P = 0.017 |
Data are presented as odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) and were analysed using logistic regression analysis.
aAdjusted for age and BMI.
bAdjusted for age, BMI, marital status, education, occupation, income and country of birth.
Relationships of weight management status and dietary intake and physical activity
Relationships of weight management practices with specific diet and physical activity variables were examined only in women with PCOS (Table IV). For healthy weight management practices, meal replacements and reducing meal or snack size were associated with higher percentage protein; lower fat or sugar was associated with lower percentage fat and saturated fat, and higher percentage protein and physical activity; following a low GI diet was associated with higher DGI and lower GI, percentage fat and saturated fat; using diet books was associated with lower fibre and the combined score for use of any healthy weight management practice was associated with higher percentage protein. For alternative weight management practices, laxative use and the combined score for use of any practice was associated with lower DGI.
Differences in dietary intake and physical activity between women with PCOS who indicated they followed a specific weight management behaviour and those who indicated that they did not.
. | Energy intake (kJ) . | DGI . | Glycaemic load . | Glycaemic index . | Fibre (grams) . | Fat (%) . | Saturated fat (%) . | Protein (%) . | CHO (%) . | Physical activity (METs·min/week) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Healthy practices | ||||||||||
Exercise | −614.2 (−1301.3, 72.8)P = 0.080 | 3.7 (0.22 7.2)P = 0.037 | −9.1 (−19.3, 1.2)P = 0.082 | −0.96 (−2.1, 0.14)P = 0.177 | −0.48 (−2.7, 1.7)P = 0.662 | −2.0 (−3.5, −0.45)P = 0.011 | −1.0 (−1.9, −0.15)P = 0.022 | 1.6 (0.69, 2.4)P < 0.001 | 0.36 (−1.4, 2.2)P = 0.690 | 295.1 (90.7, 499.6)P = 0.005 |
Commercial weight loss | −136.9 (−828.0, 554.2)P = 0.697 | 1.2 (−1.6, 4.0)P = 0.399 | −2.8 (−13.3, 7.6)P = 0.593 | −0.72 (−1.7, 0.3)P = 0.158 | −0.06 (−2.5, 2.4)P = 0.963 | −1.2 (−2.6, 0.2)P = 0.094 | −0.83 (−1.6, −0.02)P = 0.045 | 1.3 (0.26, 2.3)P = 0.015 | −0.04 (−1.8, 1.7)P = 0.961 | 16.7 (−195.3, 228.7)P = 0.877 |
Meal replacements | −365.8 (−950.9, 219.4)P = 0.220 | −1.9 (−4.8, 1.1)P = 0.210 | −10.6 (−19.3, −1.8)P = 0.018 | −0.57 (−1.5, 0.4)P = 0.235 | −1.9 (−4.0, 0.13)P = 0.066 | 0.32 (−0.94, 1.6)P = 0.614 | −0.40 (−1.1, 0.33)P = 0.285 | 1.9 (1.1, 2.8)P < 0.001 | −2.2 (−3.8, −0.53)P = 0.010 | 142.8 (−84.7, 370.4)P = 0.218 |
Reduce meal or snack size | −640.0 (−1296.0, 16.0)P = 0.056 | 3.1 (−0.2, 6.4)P = 0.066 | −10.1 (−19.5, −0.73)P = 0.035 | −0.92 (−1.9, 0.05)P = 0.063 | −1.2 (−3.2, 0.9)P = 0.273 | −1.5 (−3.0, −0.09)P = 0.037 | −0.92 (−1.8, −0.03)P = 0.043 | 1.9 (1.1, 2.7)P < 0.001 | −0.33 (−2.0, 1.3)P = 0.700 | 160.8 (−94.1, 415.7)P = 0.216 |
Reduce fat or sugar | −43.9 (−595.6, 507.8)P = 0.876 | 3.3 (0.7, 6.0)P = 0.014 | −1.6 (−9.5, 6.2)P = 0.686 | −0.72 (−1.6, 0.19)P = 0.122 | −0.09 (−1.9, 1.7)P = 0.920 | −1.9 (−3.1, −0.76)P = 0.001 | −1.4 (−2.2, −0.70)P < 0.001 | 1.7 (1.0, 2.5)P < 0.001 | 0.16 (−1.1, 1.5)P = 0.810 | 370.3 (186.9, 553.7)P< 0.001 |
Low GI diet | −217.0 (−707.1, 273.1)P = 0.385 | 4.6 (2.3, 6.9)P < 0.001 | −3.3 (−10.4, 3.9)P = 0.372 | −2.2 (−2.9, −1.5)P < 0.001 | 1.4 (−0.3, 3.2)P = 0.111 | −1.9 (−2.9, −0.80)P = 0.001 | −1.5 (−2.0, −0.87)P < 0.001 | 0.83 (0.10, 1.6)P = 0.025 | 0.99 (−0.33, 2.3) P = 0.142 | 151.8 (−14.2, 317.8)P = 0.073 |
Diet book diets | −630.0 (−1412.9, 152.9)P = 0.114 | −1.1 (−4.3, 2.2)P = 0.523 | −12.7 (−23.7, −1.6)P = 0.025 | −0.98 (−2.2, 0.22)P = 0.110 | −3.1 (−5.1, −1.0)P = 0.003 | 0.59 (−1.2, 2.4)P = 0.509 | −0.08 (−1.0, 0.85)P = 0.866 | 1.1 (0.04, 2.2)P = 0.042 | −1.6 (−3.7, 0.56)P = 0.147 | 83.6 (−162.5, 329.7)P = 0.505 |
Any healthy practice | −940.9 (−1872.5, −9.4)P = 0.048 | 3.8 (−1.2, 8.8)P = 0.133 | −14.1 (−26.9, −1.2)P = 0.032 | −1.1 (−2.5, 0.28)P = 0.117 | −2.3 (−5.0, 0.46)P = 0.103 | −2.3 (−4.3, −0.31)P = 0.023 | −1.6 (−2.9, −0.37)P = 0.012 | 2.3 (1.2, 3.5)P < 0.001 | −0.08 (−2.2, 2.0)P = 0.942 | 77.6 (−238.9, 394.2)P = 0.630 |
Alternative practices | ||||||||||
Laxatives, diuretics or diet pills | −116.4 (−1018.2, 785.5)P = 0.800 | −6.6 (−11.1, −2.1)P = 0.004 | 0.11 (−14.5, 14.7)P = 0.988 | 1.4 (0.12, 2.8)P = 0.033 | −3.0 (−5.6, −0.27)P = 0.031 | 0.18 (−2.2, 2.6)P = 0.882 | 0.49 (−0.82, 1.8)P = 0.465 | 0.22 (−0.93, 1.4) P = 0.709 | −0.29 (−2.9, 2.3)P = 0.822 | −31.2 (−324.0, 261.6)P = 0.834 |
Fasting | 37.8 (−871.0, 946.6)P = 0.935 | −3.6 (−7.8, 0.6)P = 0.089 | 2.4 (−10.9, 15.7)P = 0.724 | 1.18 (−0.55, 2.7)P = 0.194 | −0.94 (−3.7, 1.8)P = 0.503 | −0.79 (−3.1, 1.5)P = 0.506 | −0.32 (−1.5, 0.9)P = 0.598 | 0.39 (−0.98, 1.8) P = 0.578 | 0.45 (−2.1, 3.0)P = 0.722 | 348.8 (−132.4, 830.0)P = 0.155 |
Smoking | −947.3 (−2070.8, 176.3)P = 0.098 | −4.5 (−9.6, 0.7)P = 0.093 | −12.1 (−28.8, 4.7)P = 0.158 | 0.47 (−1.5, 2.4)P = 0.637 | −3.2 (−7.5, 1.1)P = 0.141 | −0.66 (−3.6, 2.3)P = 0.663 | −0.24 (−1.8, 1.4)P = 0.773 | 1.3 (−0.27, 2.9) P = 0.103 | −0.49 (−3.8, 2.9)P = 0.775 | 34.0 (−399.4, 467.5)P = 0.877 |
Any alternative practice | −357.4 (−1073.9, 359.1)P = 0.327 | −5.2 (−8.5, −1.8)P= 0.002 | −2.1 (−13.1, 8.9)P = 0.707 | 1.2 (0.05, 2.4)P = 0.042 | −2.5 (−4.8, −0.09)P = 0.042 | 0.22 (−1.9, 1.5)P = 0.799 | 0.09 (−0.85, 1.0)P = 0.851 | 0.40 (−0.66, 1.5) P = 0.457 | −0.10 (−2.1, 1.9)P = 0.918 | 118.4 (−171.8, 408.6)P = 0.423 |
. | Energy intake (kJ) . | DGI . | Glycaemic load . | Glycaemic index . | Fibre (grams) . | Fat (%) . | Saturated fat (%) . | Protein (%) . | CHO (%) . | Physical activity (METs·min/week) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Healthy practices | ||||||||||
Exercise | −614.2 (−1301.3, 72.8)P = 0.080 | 3.7 (0.22 7.2)P = 0.037 | −9.1 (−19.3, 1.2)P = 0.082 | −0.96 (−2.1, 0.14)P = 0.177 | −0.48 (−2.7, 1.7)P = 0.662 | −2.0 (−3.5, −0.45)P = 0.011 | −1.0 (−1.9, −0.15)P = 0.022 | 1.6 (0.69, 2.4)P < 0.001 | 0.36 (−1.4, 2.2)P = 0.690 | 295.1 (90.7, 499.6)P = 0.005 |
Commercial weight loss | −136.9 (−828.0, 554.2)P = 0.697 | 1.2 (−1.6, 4.0)P = 0.399 | −2.8 (−13.3, 7.6)P = 0.593 | −0.72 (−1.7, 0.3)P = 0.158 | −0.06 (−2.5, 2.4)P = 0.963 | −1.2 (−2.6, 0.2)P = 0.094 | −0.83 (−1.6, −0.02)P = 0.045 | 1.3 (0.26, 2.3)P = 0.015 | −0.04 (−1.8, 1.7)P = 0.961 | 16.7 (−195.3, 228.7)P = 0.877 |
Meal replacements | −365.8 (−950.9, 219.4)P = 0.220 | −1.9 (−4.8, 1.1)P = 0.210 | −10.6 (−19.3, −1.8)P = 0.018 | −0.57 (−1.5, 0.4)P = 0.235 | −1.9 (−4.0, 0.13)P = 0.066 | 0.32 (−0.94, 1.6)P = 0.614 | −0.40 (−1.1, 0.33)P = 0.285 | 1.9 (1.1, 2.8)P < 0.001 | −2.2 (−3.8, −0.53)P = 0.010 | 142.8 (−84.7, 370.4)P = 0.218 |
Reduce meal or snack size | −640.0 (−1296.0, 16.0)P = 0.056 | 3.1 (−0.2, 6.4)P = 0.066 | −10.1 (−19.5, −0.73)P = 0.035 | −0.92 (−1.9, 0.05)P = 0.063 | −1.2 (−3.2, 0.9)P = 0.273 | −1.5 (−3.0, −0.09)P = 0.037 | −0.92 (−1.8, −0.03)P = 0.043 | 1.9 (1.1, 2.7)P < 0.001 | −0.33 (−2.0, 1.3)P = 0.700 | 160.8 (−94.1, 415.7)P = 0.216 |
Reduce fat or sugar | −43.9 (−595.6, 507.8)P = 0.876 | 3.3 (0.7, 6.0)P = 0.014 | −1.6 (−9.5, 6.2)P = 0.686 | −0.72 (−1.6, 0.19)P = 0.122 | −0.09 (−1.9, 1.7)P = 0.920 | −1.9 (−3.1, −0.76)P = 0.001 | −1.4 (−2.2, −0.70)P < 0.001 | 1.7 (1.0, 2.5)P < 0.001 | 0.16 (−1.1, 1.5)P = 0.810 | 370.3 (186.9, 553.7)P< 0.001 |
Low GI diet | −217.0 (−707.1, 273.1)P = 0.385 | 4.6 (2.3, 6.9)P < 0.001 | −3.3 (−10.4, 3.9)P = 0.372 | −2.2 (−2.9, −1.5)P < 0.001 | 1.4 (−0.3, 3.2)P = 0.111 | −1.9 (−2.9, −0.80)P = 0.001 | −1.5 (−2.0, −0.87)P < 0.001 | 0.83 (0.10, 1.6)P = 0.025 | 0.99 (−0.33, 2.3) P = 0.142 | 151.8 (−14.2, 317.8)P = 0.073 |
Diet book diets | −630.0 (−1412.9, 152.9)P = 0.114 | −1.1 (−4.3, 2.2)P = 0.523 | −12.7 (−23.7, −1.6)P = 0.025 | −0.98 (−2.2, 0.22)P = 0.110 | −3.1 (−5.1, −1.0)P = 0.003 | 0.59 (−1.2, 2.4)P = 0.509 | −0.08 (−1.0, 0.85)P = 0.866 | 1.1 (0.04, 2.2)P = 0.042 | −1.6 (−3.7, 0.56)P = 0.147 | 83.6 (−162.5, 329.7)P = 0.505 |
Any healthy practice | −940.9 (−1872.5, −9.4)P = 0.048 | 3.8 (−1.2, 8.8)P = 0.133 | −14.1 (−26.9, −1.2)P = 0.032 | −1.1 (−2.5, 0.28)P = 0.117 | −2.3 (−5.0, 0.46)P = 0.103 | −2.3 (−4.3, −0.31)P = 0.023 | −1.6 (−2.9, −0.37)P = 0.012 | 2.3 (1.2, 3.5)P < 0.001 | −0.08 (−2.2, 2.0)P = 0.942 | 77.6 (−238.9, 394.2)P = 0.630 |
Alternative practices | ||||||||||
Laxatives, diuretics or diet pills | −116.4 (−1018.2, 785.5)P = 0.800 | −6.6 (−11.1, −2.1)P = 0.004 | 0.11 (−14.5, 14.7)P = 0.988 | 1.4 (0.12, 2.8)P = 0.033 | −3.0 (−5.6, −0.27)P = 0.031 | 0.18 (−2.2, 2.6)P = 0.882 | 0.49 (−0.82, 1.8)P = 0.465 | 0.22 (−0.93, 1.4) P = 0.709 | −0.29 (−2.9, 2.3)P = 0.822 | −31.2 (−324.0, 261.6)P = 0.834 |
Fasting | 37.8 (−871.0, 946.6)P = 0.935 | −3.6 (−7.8, 0.6)P = 0.089 | 2.4 (−10.9, 15.7)P = 0.724 | 1.18 (−0.55, 2.7)P = 0.194 | −0.94 (−3.7, 1.8)P = 0.503 | −0.79 (−3.1, 1.5)P = 0.506 | −0.32 (−1.5, 0.9)P = 0.598 | 0.39 (−0.98, 1.8) P = 0.578 | 0.45 (−2.1, 3.0)P = 0.722 | 348.8 (−132.4, 830.0)P = 0.155 |
Smoking | −947.3 (−2070.8, 176.3)P = 0.098 | −4.5 (−9.6, 0.7)P = 0.093 | −12.1 (−28.8, 4.7)P = 0.158 | 0.47 (−1.5, 2.4)P = 0.637 | −3.2 (−7.5, 1.1)P = 0.141 | −0.66 (−3.6, 2.3)P = 0.663 | −0.24 (−1.8, 1.4)P = 0.773 | 1.3 (−0.27, 2.9) P = 0.103 | −0.49 (−3.8, 2.9)P = 0.775 | 34.0 (−399.4, 467.5)P = 0.877 |
Any alternative practice | −357.4 (−1073.9, 359.1)P = 0.327 | −5.2 (−8.5, −1.8)P= 0.002 | −2.1 (−13.1, 8.9)P = 0.707 | 1.2 (0.05, 2.4)P = 0.042 | −2.5 (−4.8, −0.09)P = 0.042 | 0.22 (−1.9, 1.5)P = 0.799 | 0.09 (−0.85, 1.0)P = 0.851 | 0.40 (−0.66, 1.5) P = 0.457 | −0.10 (−2.1, 1.9)P = 0.918 | 118.4 (−171.8, 408.6)P = 0.423 |
Data are presented as mean difference (95% CI) for non-followers of the weight management practices subtracted from the values of the weight management practices. Data were analysed using linear regression analysis adjusted for age, BMI, marital status, education, occupation, income and country of birth.
CHO, carbohydrate.
Differences in dietary intake and physical activity between women with PCOS who indicated they followed a specific weight management behaviour and those who indicated that they did not.
. | Energy intake (kJ) . | DGI . | Glycaemic load . | Glycaemic index . | Fibre (grams) . | Fat (%) . | Saturated fat (%) . | Protein (%) . | CHO (%) . | Physical activity (METs·min/week) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Healthy practices | ||||||||||
Exercise | −614.2 (−1301.3, 72.8)P = 0.080 | 3.7 (0.22 7.2)P = 0.037 | −9.1 (−19.3, 1.2)P = 0.082 | −0.96 (−2.1, 0.14)P = 0.177 | −0.48 (−2.7, 1.7)P = 0.662 | −2.0 (−3.5, −0.45)P = 0.011 | −1.0 (−1.9, −0.15)P = 0.022 | 1.6 (0.69, 2.4)P < 0.001 | 0.36 (−1.4, 2.2)P = 0.690 | 295.1 (90.7, 499.6)P = 0.005 |
Commercial weight loss | −136.9 (−828.0, 554.2)P = 0.697 | 1.2 (−1.6, 4.0)P = 0.399 | −2.8 (−13.3, 7.6)P = 0.593 | −0.72 (−1.7, 0.3)P = 0.158 | −0.06 (−2.5, 2.4)P = 0.963 | −1.2 (−2.6, 0.2)P = 0.094 | −0.83 (−1.6, −0.02)P = 0.045 | 1.3 (0.26, 2.3)P = 0.015 | −0.04 (−1.8, 1.7)P = 0.961 | 16.7 (−195.3, 228.7)P = 0.877 |
Meal replacements | −365.8 (−950.9, 219.4)P = 0.220 | −1.9 (−4.8, 1.1)P = 0.210 | −10.6 (−19.3, −1.8)P = 0.018 | −0.57 (−1.5, 0.4)P = 0.235 | −1.9 (−4.0, 0.13)P = 0.066 | 0.32 (−0.94, 1.6)P = 0.614 | −0.40 (−1.1, 0.33)P = 0.285 | 1.9 (1.1, 2.8)P < 0.001 | −2.2 (−3.8, −0.53)P = 0.010 | 142.8 (−84.7, 370.4)P = 0.218 |
Reduce meal or snack size | −640.0 (−1296.0, 16.0)P = 0.056 | 3.1 (−0.2, 6.4)P = 0.066 | −10.1 (−19.5, −0.73)P = 0.035 | −0.92 (−1.9, 0.05)P = 0.063 | −1.2 (−3.2, 0.9)P = 0.273 | −1.5 (−3.0, −0.09)P = 0.037 | −0.92 (−1.8, −0.03)P = 0.043 | 1.9 (1.1, 2.7)P < 0.001 | −0.33 (−2.0, 1.3)P = 0.700 | 160.8 (−94.1, 415.7)P = 0.216 |
Reduce fat or sugar | −43.9 (−595.6, 507.8)P = 0.876 | 3.3 (0.7, 6.0)P = 0.014 | −1.6 (−9.5, 6.2)P = 0.686 | −0.72 (−1.6, 0.19)P = 0.122 | −0.09 (−1.9, 1.7)P = 0.920 | −1.9 (−3.1, −0.76)P = 0.001 | −1.4 (−2.2, −0.70)P < 0.001 | 1.7 (1.0, 2.5)P < 0.001 | 0.16 (−1.1, 1.5)P = 0.810 | 370.3 (186.9, 553.7)P< 0.001 |
Low GI diet | −217.0 (−707.1, 273.1)P = 0.385 | 4.6 (2.3, 6.9)P < 0.001 | −3.3 (−10.4, 3.9)P = 0.372 | −2.2 (−2.9, −1.5)P < 0.001 | 1.4 (−0.3, 3.2)P = 0.111 | −1.9 (−2.9, −0.80)P = 0.001 | −1.5 (−2.0, −0.87)P < 0.001 | 0.83 (0.10, 1.6)P = 0.025 | 0.99 (−0.33, 2.3) P = 0.142 | 151.8 (−14.2, 317.8)P = 0.073 |
Diet book diets | −630.0 (−1412.9, 152.9)P = 0.114 | −1.1 (−4.3, 2.2)P = 0.523 | −12.7 (−23.7, −1.6)P = 0.025 | −0.98 (−2.2, 0.22)P = 0.110 | −3.1 (−5.1, −1.0)P = 0.003 | 0.59 (−1.2, 2.4)P = 0.509 | −0.08 (−1.0, 0.85)P = 0.866 | 1.1 (0.04, 2.2)P = 0.042 | −1.6 (−3.7, 0.56)P = 0.147 | 83.6 (−162.5, 329.7)P = 0.505 |
Any healthy practice | −940.9 (−1872.5, −9.4)P = 0.048 | 3.8 (−1.2, 8.8)P = 0.133 | −14.1 (−26.9, −1.2)P = 0.032 | −1.1 (−2.5, 0.28)P = 0.117 | −2.3 (−5.0, 0.46)P = 0.103 | −2.3 (−4.3, −0.31)P = 0.023 | −1.6 (−2.9, −0.37)P = 0.012 | 2.3 (1.2, 3.5)P < 0.001 | −0.08 (−2.2, 2.0)P = 0.942 | 77.6 (−238.9, 394.2)P = 0.630 |
Alternative practices | ||||||||||
Laxatives, diuretics or diet pills | −116.4 (−1018.2, 785.5)P = 0.800 | −6.6 (−11.1, −2.1)P = 0.004 | 0.11 (−14.5, 14.7)P = 0.988 | 1.4 (0.12, 2.8)P = 0.033 | −3.0 (−5.6, −0.27)P = 0.031 | 0.18 (−2.2, 2.6)P = 0.882 | 0.49 (−0.82, 1.8)P = 0.465 | 0.22 (−0.93, 1.4) P = 0.709 | −0.29 (−2.9, 2.3)P = 0.822 | −31.2 (−324.0, 261.6)P = 0.834 |
Fasting | 37.8 (−871.0, 946.6)P = 0.935 | −3.6 (−7.8, 0.6)P = 0.089 | 2.4 (−10.9, 15.7)P = 0.724 | 1.18 (−0.55, 2.7)P = 0.194 | −0.94 (−3.7, 1.8)P = 0.503 | −0.79 (−3.1, 1.5)P = 0.506 | −0.32 (−1.5, 0.9)P = 0.598 | 0.39 (−0.98, 1.8) P = 0.578 | 0.45 (−2.1, 3.0)P = 0.722 | 348.8 (−132.4, 830.0)P = 0.155 |
Smoking | −947.3 (−2070.8, 176.3)P = 0.098 | −4.5 (−9.6, 0.7)P = 0.093 | −12.1 (−28.8, 4.7)P = 0.158 | 0.47 (−1.5, 2.4)P = 0.637 | −3.2 (−7.5, 1.1)P = 0.141 | −0.66 (−3.6, 2.3)P = 0.663 | −0.24 (−1.8, 1.4)P = 0.773 | 1.3 (−0.27, 2.9) P = 0.103 | −0.49 (−3.8, 2.9)P = 0.775 | 34.0 (−399.4, 467.5)P = 0.877 |
Any alternative practice | −357.4 (−1073.9, 359.1)P = 0.327 | −5.2 (−8.5, −1.8)P= 0.002 | −2.1 (−13.1, 8.9)P = 0.707 | 1.2 (0.05, 2.4)P = 0.042 | −2.5 (−4.8, −0.09)P = 0.042 | 0.22 (−1.9, 1.5)P = 0.799 | 0.09 (−0.85, 1.0)P = 0.851 | 0.40 (−0.66, 1.5) P = 0.457 | −0.10 (−2.1, 1.9)P = 0.918 | 118.4 (−171.8, 408.6)P = 0.423 |
. | Energy intake (kJ) . | DGI . | Glycaemic load . | Glycaemic index . | Fibre (grams) . | Fat (%) . | Saturated fat (%) . | Protein (%) . | CHO (%) . | Physical activity (METs·min/week) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Healthy practices | ||||||||||
Exercise | −614.2 (−1301.3, 72.8)P = 0.080 | 3.7 (0.22 7.2)P = 0.037 | −9.1 (−19.3, 1.2)P = 0.082 | −0.96 (−2.1, 0.14)P = 0.177 | −0.48 (−2.7, 1.7)P = 0.662 | −2.0 (−3.5, −0.45)P = 0.011 | −1.0 (−1.9, −0.15)P = 0.022 | 1.6 (0.69, 2.4)P < 0.001 | 0.36 (−1.4, 2.2)P = 0.690 | 295.1 (90.7, 499.6)P = 0.005 |
Commercial weight loss | −136.9 (−828.0, 554.2)P = 0.697 | 1.2 (−1.6, 4.0)P = 0.399 | −2.8 (−13.3, 7.6)P = 0.593 | −0.72 (−1.7, 0.3)P = 0.158 | −0.06 (−2.5, 2.4)P = 0.963 | −1.2 (−2.6, 0.2)P = 0.094 | −0.83 (−1.6, −0.02)P = 0.045 | 1.3 (0.26, 2.3)P = 0.015 | −0.04 (−1.8, 1.7)P = 0.961 | 16.7 (−195.3, 228.7)P = 0.877 |
Meal replacements | −365.8 (−950.9, 219.4)P = 0.220 | −1.9 (−4.8, 1.1)P = 0.210 | −10.6 (−19.3, −1.8)P = 0.018 | −0.57 (−1.5, 0.4)P = 0.235 | −1.9 (−4.0, 0.13)P = 0.066 | 0.32 (−0.94, 1.6)P = 0.614 | −0.40 (−1.1, 0.33)P = 0.285 | 1.9 (1.1, 2.8)P < 0.001 | −2.2 (−3.8, −0.53)P = 0.010 | 142.8 (−84.7, 370.4)P = 0.218 |
Reduce meal or snack size | −640.0 (−1296.0, 16.0)P = 0.056 | 3.1 (−0.2, 6.4)P = 0.066 | −10.1 (−19.5, −0.73)P = 0.035 | −0.92 (−1.9, 0.05)P = 0.063 | −1.2 (−3.2, 0.9)P = 0.273 | −1.5 (−3.0, −0.09)P = 0.037 | −0.92 (−1.8, −0.03)P = 0.043 | 1.9 (1.1, 2.7)P < 0.001 | −0.33 (−2.0, 1.3)P = 0.700 | 160.8 (−94.1, 415.7)P = 0.216 |
Reduce fat or sugar | −43.9 (−595.6, 507.8)P = 0.876 | 3.3 (0.7, 6.0)P = 0.014 | −1.6 (−9.5, 6.2)P = 0.686 | −0.72 (−1.6, 0.19)P = 0.122 | −0.09 (−1.9, 1.7)P = 0.920 | −1.9 (−3.1, −0.76)P = 0.001 | −1.4 (−2.2, −0.70)P < 0.001 | 1.7 (1.0, 2.5)P < 0.001 | 0.16 (−1.1, 1.5)P = 0.810 | 370.3 (186.9, 553.7)P< 0.001 |
Low GI diet | −217.0 (−707.1, 273.1)P = 0.385 | 4.6 (2.3, 6.9)P < 0.001 | −3.3 (−10.4, 3.9)P = 0.372 | −2.2 (−2.9, −1.5)P < 0.001 | 1.4 (−0.3, 3.2)P = 0.111 | −1.9 (−2.9, −0.80)P = 0.001 | −1.5 (−2.0, −0.87)P < 0.001 | 0.83 (0.10, 1.6)P = 0.025 | 0.99 (−0.33, 2.3) P = 0.142 | 151.8 (−14.2, 317.8)P = 0.073 |
Diet book diets | −630.0 (−1412.9, 152.9)P = 0.114 | −1.1 (−4.3, 2.2)P = 0.523 | −12.7 (−23.7, −1.6)P = 0.025 | −0.98 (−2.2, 0.22)P = 0.110 | −3.1 (−5.1, −1.0)P = 0.003 | 0.59 (−1.2, 2.4)P = 0.509 | −0.08 (−1.0, 0.85)P = 0.866 | 1.1 (0.04, 2.2)P = 0.042 | −1.6 (−3.7, 0.56)P = 0.147 | 83.6 (−162.5, 329.7)P = 0.505 |
Any healthy practice | −940.9 (−1872.5, −9.4)P = 0.048 | 3.8 (−1.2, 8.8)P = 0.133 | −14.1 (−26.9, −1.2)P = 0.032 | −1.1 (−2.5, 0.28)P = 0.117 | −2.3 (−5.0, 0.46)P = 0.103 | −2.3 (−4.3, −0.31)P = 0.023 | −1.6 (−2.9, −0.37)P = 0.012 | 2.3 (1.2, 3.5)P < 0.001 | −0.08 (−2.2, 2.0)P = 0.942 | 77.6 (−238.9, 394.2)P = 0.630 |
Alternative practices | ||||||||||
Laxatives, diuretics or diet pills | −116.4 (−1018.2, 785.5)P = 0.800 | −6.6 (−11.1, −2.1)P = 0.004 | 0.11 (−14.5, 14.7)P = 0.988 | 1.4 (0.12, 2.8)P = 0.033 | −3.0 (−5.6, −0.27)P = 0.031 | 0.18 (−2.2, 2.6)P = 0.882 | 0.49 (−0.82, 1.8)P = 0.465 | 0.22 (−0.93, 1.4) P = 0.709 | −0.29 (−2.9, 2.3)P = 0.822 | −31.2 (−324.0, 261.6)P = 0.834 |
Fasting | 37.8 (−871.0, 946.6)P = 0.935 | −3.6 (−7.8, 0.6)P = 0.089 | 2.4 (−10.9, 15.7)P = 0.724 | 1.18 (−0.55, 2.7)P = 0.194 | −0.94 (−3.7, 1.8)P = 0.503 | −0.79 (−3.1, 1.5)P = 0.506 | −0.32 (−1.5, 0.9)P = 0.598 | 0.39 (−0.98, 1.8) P = 0.578 | 0.45 (−2.1, 3.0)P = 0.722 | 348.8 (−132.4, 830.0)P = 0.155 |
Smoking | −947.3 (−2070.8, 176.3)P = 0.098 | −4.5 (−9.6, 0.7)P = 0.093 | −12.1 (−28.8, 4.7)P = 0.158 | 0.47 (−1.5, 2.4)P = 0.637 | −3.2 (−7.5, 1.1)P = 0.141 | −0.66 (−3.6, 2.3)P = 0.663 | −0.24 (−1.8, 1.4)P = 0.773 | 1.3 (−0.27, 2.9) P = 0.103 | −0.49 (−3.8, 2.9)P = 0.775 | 34.0 (−399.4, 467.5)P = 0.877 |
Any alternative practice | −357.4 (−1073.9, 359.1)P = 0.327 | −5.2 (−8.5, −1.8)P= 0.002 | −2.1 (−13.1, 8.9)P = 0.707 | 1.2 (0.05, 2.4)P = 0.042 | −2.5 (−4.8, −0.09)P = 0.042 | 0.22 (−1.9, 1.5)P = 0.799 | 0.09 (−0.85, 1.0)P = 0.851 | 0.40 (−0.66, 1.5) P = 0.457 | −0.10 (−2.1, 1.9)P = 0.918 | 118.4 (−171.8, 408.6)P = 0.423 |
Data are presented as mean difference (95% CI) for non-followers of the weight management practices subtracted from the values of the weight management practices. Data were analysed using linear regression analysis adjusted for age, BMI, marital status, education, occupation, income and country of birth.
CHO, carbohydrate.
Discussion
We report here a comprehensive examination of weight management practices in community samples of women with and without PCOS. Women with PCOS were more likely to follow a number of both healthy weight management practices and alternative ones. Those following healthy practices had improved dietary intake with regard to a number of domains of diet quality while those following alternative weight management practices (specifically laxative use) had a poorer quality of diet.
While the women with PCOS had higher adiposity (Moran et al., 2013,b, 2015; Teede et al., 2013), the greater engagement in weight management practices observed here was maintained on adjustment for BMI and other demographic factors for some, but not all practices. This indicates that PCOS status itself is associated with a higher prevalence of engaging in weight management practices. This may be related to women with PCOS being more likely to perceive themselves at risk of obesity (Moran et al., 2010a) and primary health care physicians being more likely to diagnose overweight and obesity in patients with associated comorbidities (Battaglia et al., 2011; Ossolinski et al., 2015). These findings are consistent with difficulty in losing weight being the most common health concern for n = 1385 women with PCOS (Gibson-Helm et al., 2016).
Women with PCOS were more likely to report following specific healthy weight management approaches such as reducing meal or snack size or fat or sugar intake, or a low GI diet, compared with women without PCOS. These approaches are consistent with weight management guidelines (Jensen et al., 2014) and recommended by specialists in primary health care (Ossolinski et al., 2015) and in the limited literature on PCOS (Humphreys and Costarelli, 2008). Of interest, following a low GI diet was the strategy with the greatest difference in uptake between women with and without PCOS. The prevalence of following a low GI diet for weight management for non-PCOS women here (13.6%) is similar to a New Zealand community-based study of older women (11.2%) (Leong et al., 2013). The reason for a higher prevalence in PCOS (33.7%) may relate to its perceived importance in PCOS. A low GI diet resulted in greater improvements in insulin resistance, menstrual regularity and fibrinogen in PCOS (Marsh et al., 2010; Barr et al., 2013) and in anthropometry, lipids, inflammation and insulin in a meta-analysis in the general population (Thomas et al., 2007; Goff et al., 2013; Schwingshackl and Hoffmann, 2013) although a recent systematic review reported insufficient evidence to recommend one specific dietary approach as being beneficial in PCOS (Moran et al., 2013a). However, despite being willing to follow a healthy approach generally consistent with population weight management guidelines, women with PCOS still have a greater rate of weight gain related to higher caloric intake (Moran et al., 2013,b).
We report here that women with and without PCOS had a similar uptake of exercise for weight management, consistent with previous findings (Wright et al., 2004) of no differences in physical activity between women with and without PCOS. The overall prevalence of undertaking physical activity was high for both women with (85.4%) or without (82.1%) PCOS and comparable to Australia community-based data (84.4%) (Timperio et al., 2000). Exercise in PCOS reduces insulin resistance and has health benefits independent of weight change (Hutchison et al., 2011; Moran et al., 2011), and evidence-based guidelines for PCOS management recommend incorporating structured physical activity advice (Teede et al., 2011). As this study was conducted prior to the PCOS guidelines release (2009 versus 2011), women may therefore have been less likely to receive this advice. Young women also have a preference for dietary versus physical activity-based approaches for weight management (Lombard et al., 2010) and barriers for increasing physical activity are even more pronounced in PCOS (Banting et al., 2014). This highlights the need to address barriers to encourage exercise participation.
Women with PCOS were also more likely to follow alternative non-lifestyle-related weight management practices than women without PCOS. In the general population, the use of unhealthy weight control practices is a potential risk factors for the future development of eating disorders, depression or weight cycling (Ferraro et al., 2015). This is consistent with the greater likelihood that women with PCOS will exhibit disordered eating patterns such as bulimia nervosa (Naessen et al., 2006), worsened psychological health (Barry et al., 2011) and greater weight gain (Teede et al., 2013) than women without PCOS. Importantly, this highlights the clinical need for women with PCOS to receive education on the appropriate use of healthy weight control practices, and assessment and management of the use of alternative weight control practices.
For women with PCOS, following healthy weight management practices, including following a low GI diet, reducing fat or sugar intake or reducing meal or snack size, was associated with improved diet. The greatest number of dietary changes occurred for a low GI diet, which was associated with higher diet quality and lower GI, and percentage fat and saturated fat. Overall, these are positive dietary modifications consistent with population dietary or weight management recommendations (Jensen et al., 2014; Ossolinski et al., 2015) and indicate a potentially beneficial effect of following these strategies. This is consistent with the association of the use of healthy weight management strategies such as choosing lower-kilojoule foods with improved diet quality (Lin et al., 2013) and lower percentage fat and higher percentage protein (Neumark-Sztainer et al., 2000). In relation to alternative weight management practices, the only change observed here was worsened diet quality predominantly related to laxative use. This is consistent with prior reports in the general population where those following unhealthy weight management practices had a higher proportion of energy intake from fat or sweets and a lower fibre, fruit and iron intake (Neumark-Sztainer et al., 1996, 2000) than those following healthy weight management practices. The clinical relevance of the higher (4.6 units) or lower (6.6 units) DGI for a low GI diet or laxative use, respectively, is unclear, given that a 10 unit greater DGI is associated with only subtle metabolic improvements (McNaughton et al., 2009). However, the potential detrimental impact of unhealthy weight management practices on nutritional intake should still be considered for women with PCOS. This affirms that interpretation of weight management strategies in PCOS should focus on changes in dietary quantity as well as quality.
Strengths of this study include the use of a large community-based cohort, rather than women recruited from fertility or endocrinology clinics (Humphreys and Costarelli, 2008), who are more likely to be more overweight (Ezeh et al., 2013) and more adversely affected. Limitations include the use of self-reported data for height, weight, diet, physical activity and weight management behaviours. While the use of self-report of PCOS is also a limitation, it is not feasible to clinically verify PCOS or control status in population-based research. However, we previously validated self-reported PCOS status with menstrual cyclicity in this cohort (Teede et al., 2013). We note categories for defining weight management practices and our post hoc definitions of healthy or alternative practices are broad and may contain some degree of overlap. For example, some [e.g. the CSIRO diet (Noakes et al., 2005)], but not all, diet book approaches are evidence based. ‘Diet pills’ may also include medically prescribed pharmacological agents (e.g. orlistat or sibutramine) in addition to unhealthy weight management medications (e.g. laxatives).
In conclusion, we report the independent association of PCOS status with healthy and alternative weight management practices and the independent association of healthy weight management practices with better dietary quality and alternative weight management practices with worsened dietary quality in PCOS. Future weight management advice for women with PCOS needs to consider assessment and treatment of both healthy and unhealthy weight management practices. There is also a need to focus both on improving diet quality and on reducing dietary energy intake when optimizing dietary intake for weight management.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data are available at Human Reproduction online.
Acknowledgements
The research on which this paper is based was conducted as part of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, which was conceived and developed by groups of inter-disciplinary researchers at The University of Newcastle and The University of Queensland. We are grateful to the women who provided the survey data. The authors thank Professor Graham Giles of the Cancer Epidemiology Centre of The Cancer Council Victoria for permission to use the Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies (version 2), Melbourne: The Cancer Council Victoria, 1996. We also thank all the participants for their valuable contribution to this project.
Authors’ roles
L.M. and W.B. had substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data. L.M., A.J. and S.M. contributed to analysis of data. L.M., W.B., A.J., S.M. and H.T. contributed to interpretation of data, drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and had final approval of the version to be published.
Funding
We are grateful to the Australian Government Department of Health for funding. L.M. is supported by a South Australian Cardiovascular Research Development Program Fellowship (ID AC11S374); a program collaboratively funded by the National Heart Foundation, the South Australian Department of Health and the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute. H.T. is supported by the NHMRC. S.A.M. is supported by an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship Level 2, ID1104636 and was previously supported by an ARC Future Fellowship (2011–2015, FT100100581).
Conflict of interest
None declared.