-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Jef Ausloos, Pierre Dewitte, Shattering one-way mirrors – data subject access rights in practice, International Data Privacy Law, Volume 8, Issue 1, February 2018, Pages 4–28, https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipy001
- Share Icon Share
Extract
...
Introduction
EU data protection law offers individuals an arsenal of rights they can exercise against controllers. Among them, the right of access constitutes a cornerstone of data subjects’ informational empowerment. The right allows individuals to monitor what personal data are held about them, how it is being processed and with whom it is shared. Especially in light of a growingly complex data processing eco-system and the increased reliance on ‘data’ to make all kinds of (life-affecting) decisions, the right of access can play a crucial role in safeguarding fairness, accountability, and responsibility. All the more considering the one-way mirrors many controllers have erected around them. Indeed, the right of access offers an effective opportunity to break through information asymmetries so prevalent in the context of information society services today.
In practice, however, the right of access—and data subject rights more broadly—is/are often said to be ignored, inefficient, underused and/or obsolete. Nevertheless, not much empirical research exists actually substantiating these claims. Anecdotal evidence does suggest some truth to the former three allegations,1 but concluding therefore that (some) data subject rights are obsolete seems unwarranted. In order to have an informed debate—grounded in practical reality—we set out to gather empirical data on how data subject rights are exercised and accommodated in the field. While the initial focus was on the rights of access and erasure, only limited information was gathered on the latter. This article therefore focuses on the right of access only. Nonetheless, it is deemed that the findings are already quite useful in demonstrating systematic issues regarding the accommodation of data subject rights more broadly. While the empirical findings do indeed confirm some suspicions (eg underused, ignored), they allow to pinpoint key obstacles much more precisely and therefore facilitate devising ways on how to overcome these obstacles.