- Split View
-
Views
-
CiteCitation
Jussi Hirvonen, Hasse Karlsson, Jaana Kajander, Antti Lepola, Juha Markkula, Helena Rasi-Hakala, Kjell Någren, Jouko K. Salminen, Jarmo Hietala; Decreased brain serotonin 5-HT1A receptor availability in medication-naive patients with major depressive disorder: an in-vivo imaging study using PET and [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635, International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, Volume 11, Issue 4, 1 June 2008, Pages 465–476, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145707008140
Download citation file:
© 2018 Oxford University Press
Close -
Share
Abstract
Serotonin (5-HT) is involved in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD). Among the numerous serotonergic receptors, the 5-HT1A receptor subtype is of interest because of its involvement in cognition, hippocampal neurogenesis, and mechanism of action of antidepressant drugs. Previous imaging studies have suggested altered availability of 5-HT1A receptors in MDD but prior antidepressant medication and chronicity of the illness may confound the interpretation. We examined 21 drug-naive primary-care patients with MDD using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635, a radioligand for 5-HT1A receptors, along with 15 healthy control subjects. Binding to receptors was assessed both regionally and at voxel level with the binding potential (BP) that was estimated using arterial blood input. Compared with healthy controls, the BP of [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 was reduced in patients with MDD in most brain regions, ranging from −9% to −25%. Voxel-level analysis confirmed this finding by showing a widespread reduction of [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 BP. No statistically significant associations were observed between BP and total HAMD scores in the patients, but lower BP was associated with higher likelihood of insomnia. This study demonstrated a widespread reduction in the availability of serotonin 5-HT1A receptors in a relatively large sample of drug-naive primary-care patients with MDD, suggesting the involvement of this receptor subtype in the pathophysiology of the illness. Lack of correlation with overall severity of the illness may relate to a largely trait-like nature of this abnormality in depressive disorders.
Introduction
The monoamine hypothesis of major depressive disorder (MDD) was primarily based on indirect pharmacological evidence (Carlsson et al., 1968; Kuhn, 1958; Schildkraut, 1965). Specifically, it suggests that a deficit in the functioning of monoamine neurotransmitters (such as serotonin; 5-HT) is central to the pathophysiology of the illness. Conversely, the use of drugs that increase the synaptic concentration of 5-HT by means of 5-HT transporter blockade [such as tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)], is the first line of pharmacological treatment for MDD (Duval et al., 2005). Further support for this hypothesis is provided by studies of post-mortem samples of the human brain that have demonstrated abnormalities in the densities of various 5-HT receptor subtypes. However, a clear picture has not emerged from these studies, and it is often difficult to distinguish between disease-specific influences and confounding factors, such as psychiatric comorbidity and antidepressant medication (Stockmeier, 2003).
In-vivo imaging studies of the brain serotonergic system using positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) appear to be the best methods of revealing disease-specific abnormalities in the brains of living patients. Previous studies have examined serotonin 5-HT1A receptor binding (Bhagwagar et al., 2004; Drevets et al., 1999; Meltzer et al., 2004; Parsey et al., 2006a; Sargent et al., 2000), serotonin 5-HT2 receptor binding (Attar-Lévy et al., 1999; Bhagwagar et al., 2006; Biver et al., 1997; Messa et al., 2003; Meyer et al., 1999a, 2003; Mintun et al., 2004; Schins et al., 2005; Sheline et al., 2004; Yatham et al., 2000), and 5-HT transporter availability (Catafau et al., 2006; Herold et al., 2006; Ichimiya et al., 2002; Lehto et al., 2006; Malison et al., 1998; Meyer et al., 2001, 2004; Newberg et al., 2005; Parsey et al., 2006b; Reivich et al., 2004; Staley et al., 2006) in patients with major MDD relative to healthy comparison subjects. However, results from these studies have been mixed; factors likely to contribute to inconsistent findings may include clinical heterogeneity across different samples, the choice of radiotracer as well as the quantification methods applied, and whether or not patients have been on antidepressant drug treatment prior to imaging studies (for review see Stockmeier, 2003). A recent PET study demonstrated significantly increased levels of monoamine oxidase A (MAOA), an enzyme that breaks down 5-HT, norepidephrine, and dopamine, in the brains of patients with major depression (Meyer et al., 2006). The latter finding argues for a more general defect in monoamine function in major depression.
Of the 5-HT receptors the 5-HT1A subtype is of particular interest (Albert and Lemonde, 2004). The 5-HT1A subtype is expressed as two distinct populations in the brain: as somatodendritic presynaptic autoreceptors in the raphe nuclei, from where all serotonergic neurons ascend, and post-synaptic receptors in limbic structures and in the neocortex (Aznavour and Zimmer, 2007). Somatodendritic autoreceptors in the raphe nuclei regulate the firing of serotonergic neurons and are thus in a central position to control 5-HT release at projection terminals (Fisher et al., 2006). Desensitization of these receptors is thought to explain the delayed antidepressant response to SSRI treatment (Blier and Ward, 2003). Post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptors influence cortical pyramidal cell functioning and thereby affect cognition and emotion (Díaz-Mataix et al., 2005; Yuen et al., 2005), and they also contribute to hippocampal neurogenesis, a neurobiological substrate for the antidepressant effect (Berton and Nestler, 2006; Manji et al., 2001). PET with the 5-HT1A antagonist radioligand [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 provides high-contrast images of 5-HT1A receptor distribution in the living human brain (Farde et al., 1998; Gunn et al., 1998; Hirvonen et al., 2007; Parsey et al., 2000; Pike et al., 1996). This paradigm has been previously used to demonstrate altered in-vivo 5-HT1A availability in MDD (Bhagwagar et al., 2004; Drevets et al., 1999; Meltzer et al., 2004; Parsey et al., 2006a; Sargent et al., 2000). Importantly, previous antidepressant drug treatment may contribute to the in-vivo availability of [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 (Parsey et al., 2006a), thus emphasizing the need for studying MDD patients who have not been previously exposed to SSRI treatment.
The purpose of this study was to assess the in-vivo 5-HT1A availability using PET and [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 in a sample of medication-naive MDD patients as well as in healthy control subjects. Arterial blood samples were acquired from all subjects to allow for the accurate discrimination of specific and non-specific binding using kinetic compartmental modelling.
Method
This study was approved by the Joint Ethics Committee of the University of Turku and Turku University Central Hospital, and was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects gave ethics committee-approved written informed consent.
Subjects and clinical evaluations
The study was carried out at Turku PET Centre and performed in collaboration with the psychiatric clinics of the Helsinki and Turku universities and the Research Centre of the Social Insurance Institution (Turku, Finland) during 2000–2004. This study was part of a larger project comparing psychotherapy and SSRI drug treatment in treating MDD. The patients with symptoms of depression were recruited from five occupational health service (OHS) units providing primary health care.
At the Research Centre, all subjects were interviewed by a psychiatrist, using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (First et al., 1997). The severity of the depression was assessed by the psychiatrist using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD; Hamilton, 1967). The subjects were also asked to complete the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck et al., 1961). The inclusion criteria for the study were: (1) mild or moderate episode of major depressive disorder, (2) HAMD score of ⩾13, (3) age 20–60 yr, (4) no psychotherapeutic or psychopharmacological treatment during the preceding 4 months, (5) no DSM-IV Axis I or Axis II comorbidity, (6) no severe somatic illnesses. Twenty-one patients diagnosed with MDD entered the PET study, and were compared against 15 healthy control subjects. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study sample are given in Table 1. The patients with MDD were on average moderately ill: total HAMD scores ranged from 13 to 23 (median 18), and total BDI scores were from 10 to 40 (median 23) (data missing from one patient, n=20). Seventeen patients (81%) were experiencing their first depressive episode, while four (19%) had recurrent depression: of those, three (14.3%) had had one previous depressive episode, and one (4.8%) had suffered two previous episodes. Education was reported using three categorical levels based on years of education (‘1’, <13 yr; ‘2’, 13–15 years; ‘3’, ⩾16 yr). Five patients (24%) were using oral benzodiazepines (midazolam, oxazepam, temazepam) or non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (zopiclone, zolpidem).
Demographic and clinical characteristics and radiochemical measurements of the study sample
BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; MDD, major depressive disorder; s.d., standard deviation.
t=−2.60, p=0.014. b χ2=0.86, p=0.769. c Data missing from one control (n=14), t=−0.49, p=0.625. d Data missing from one patient (n=20). e All p>0.3.
Demographic and clinical characteristics and radiochemical measurements of the study sample
BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; MDD, major depressive disorder; s.d., standard deviation.
t=−2.60, p=0.014. b χ2=0.86, p=0.769. c Data missing from one control (n=14), t=−0.49, p=0.625. d Data missing from one patient (n=20). e All p>0.3.
PET procedures
The radioligand [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 was prepared according to published procedures (Hirvonen et al., 2007). PET experiments were carried out using a whole-body 3D PET scanner (GE Advance; GE, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with 35 slices of 4.25-mm thickness covering the whole brain, running in 3D mode, essentially as previously described (Hirvonen et al., 2007). Briefly, an intravenous bolus of [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 was given in the right antecubital vein and rapidly washed with saline. The average (±s.d.) injected dose and mass were 232.6±52.7 MBq and 1.18±0.80 µg, respectively. Radiochemical purity was at least 96%. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the radiochemical parameters between patients with MDD and healthy controls (Table 1). The uptake of [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 was measured for 57 min using 14 time-frames of increasing duration. To obtain arterial input function for modelling, the left radial artery was cannulated for obtaining arterial samples. Samples were collected for the measurement of plasma radioactivity and metabolites according to a previously published protocol (Hirvonen et al., 2007). Finally, an arterial plasma input curve for [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 corrected for metabolites was constructed.
Automated region of interest (ROI) analysis
PET images were analysed using an automated ROI analysis based on spatial normalization into standard space of dynamic PET images and a ROI template (Hirvonen et al., 2006). First, a ligand-specific template for [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 was constructed using data from 12 healthy volunteers and an MRI-assisted procedure (Meyer et al., 1999b). Transformation parameters were then estimated from individual integral (summed) [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 PET images using SPM2 (Friston et al., 1995). These transformation parameters were then applied to dynamic [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 PET images, frame by frame, using in-house software based on SPM2 routines. Finally, a set of ROIs were created in the standard space, and applied onto each individual spatially normalized dynamic [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 PET image to yield regional tissue time–activity curves, using Imadeus software (version 1.2, Forima Inc., Turku, Finland). Appropriate ROI placement was ensured by visual inspection of every slice from all subjects. Similar strategies employing spatial normalization and a standard ROI set have been previously used to quantify [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 binding (Rabiner et al., 2002), and at our laboratory, there is good convergence between values from the automated and traditional manual ROI analyses (J. Hirvonen and J. Hietala, unpublished observations). ROIs covered the following brain regions: amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, dorsal raphe nuclei, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, angular gyrus, inferior, middle, and superior temporal gyri, medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, hippocampus, insular cortex, supramarginal gyrus, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and posterior cingulate cortex. The ROI for dorsal raphe nuclei was drawn directly on the [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 template, since this structure is not readily visible in MR images. Cerebellar white matter was used as the reference region (Hirvonen et al., 2007; Parsey et al., 2005). Prior to modelling, contributions of total blood radioactivity to regional tissue time–activity curves was eliminated by assuming 5% blood volume in the ROI and subtracting it directly from regional radioactivity.
Quantification of [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 availability
A linearized method based on non-negative least squares optimization was used to calculate regional total distribution volumes (VT), according to the standard two-tissue compartmental model (2TM) (Hirvonen et al., 2007). Binding potential (BP) values were indirectly estimated from VT values of ROIs and the reference region (Hirvonen et al., 2007). Two commonly used estimates of BP were considered: BPP=VT[ROI]−VT[ref] and BPND=VT[ROI]/VT[ref]−1 (BPP/VT[ref]). BPP is proportional to fPBavail/KD (where fP is the fraction of free or non-protein bound radiotracer in the plasma, Bavail is the total concentration for receptors, and KD is the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant), whereas BPND is proportional to fNDBavail/KD, where fND is the fraction of radioactivity originating from free radiotracer in the non-displaceable tissue compartment (Innis et al., 2007). The free fraction fP was not measured in the present study.
Voxel-based analyses
To facilitate detailed visualization of the results, a confirmatory voxel-based analysis was performed. First, individual parametric BPP and BPND maps were calculated by estimating VT values voxel-wise using a linearized method based on non-negative least squares optimization and then performing the BP calculations voxel-wise, using the cerebellar white-matter VT from the automated ROI analysis as an estimate of VT[ref]. Preprocessing and statistical analysis was performed using SPM2 (Friston et al., 1995) running on Matlab 6.5 for Windows (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). Parametric BP maps were then spatially normalized into standard space using normalization parameters estimated for the automated ROI analysis (see above). Spatially normalized parametric BP maps were then smoothed using a 12-mm Gaussian kernel. Group differences were analysed using a two-sample t test option in SPM2. As BP values are quantitative in nature, no scaling of voxel-wise BP values was performed. Images were masked using the image global value as threshold, and zeros were ignored. Height threshold was set at p<0.05 (uncorrected voxel level), and extent threshold at 100 voxels. A cluster-level corrected p value of 0.05 was considered the criterion for statistical significance.
Statistical analyses of ROI-based data
Statistical analyses were performed on the natural logarithm of BPP and BPND values, to reduce non-normality of distribution of BP values, as well as to facilitate direct comparison with a recent report on MDD subjects (Parsey et al., 2006a). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0 for Windows (Release 13.0.1, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were analysed by means of repeated-measures analysis of variance (rmANOVA) with region (ROI) and hemisphere as within-subject factors and age as the between-subject predictor of BP. Group×region interaction was modelled to investigate regionally specific group differences in BP values. Sex entered the model as a covariate (Parsey et al., 2002). Age was not included in the model: it does not appear to influence the BP of [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 in large samples of human subjects (Parsey et al., 2002; Rabiner et al., 2002). Consistent with published reports, we did not observe any effects of age on BP1 in a sample of 36 healthy volunteers (aged 18–48 yr) scanned with [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 at our laboratory (R2=0.00–0.07) (unpublished observations). We also tested for the effects of age, sex, body mass index, and years of education on the mean post-synaptic BPP of [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 by applying a linear regression model in the study groups separately, but none of the predictors were statistically significant (all p>0.12). To control for positive bias due to violation of the sphericity assumption associated with interaction terms including within-subject factor with three or more levels, Mauchly's tests of sphericity was performed and degrees of freedom in the averaged tests of significance were adjusted using the Greenhouse–Geisser method. A separate linear regression model (with group status and sex as regressors) was built for dorsal raphe nuclei, which is a midline structure. As a methodological validation, cerebellar white-matter VT values were compared between the study groups to investigate possible group differences in VT[ref]. Effect sizes for group differences were calculated as the absolute difference between MDD subjects and healthy controls divided by the standard deviation in the healthy control group. The associations between regional [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 BP and total BDI and HAMD scores (being scale variables) was analysed using the parametric Pearson correlation coefficients, and the association between BP and individual HAMD subscores (being ordinate variables) was tested using the non-parametric Spearman correlation coefficient. Data are presented as mean±standard deviation unless otherwise specified. p values of <0.05 were considered criteria for statistical significance.
Results
Group differences in 5-HT1A binding potential
MDD patients tended to have lower VT[ref] values compared with controls (0.40±0.12 vs. 0.47±0.08, p=0.055, equal variances assumed). Thus, BPP was selected as the outcome measure of choice, given the relative independence of this measure to changes in VT[ref] as compared with BPND and the fact that fP is not different between MDD patients and healthy controls (Meltzer et al., 2004; Parsey et al., 2006a).
The rmANOVA with group status and sex as the between-subject predictors and region and hemisphere as within-subject predictors of BPP showed a significant main effect of group (F=5.00, p=0.032) but no effects of sex (F=1.25, p=0.271). Group×region and group×hemisphere interactions were not statistically significant, thus implying that the group difference was similar in magnitude across brain regions and in both hemispheres. BPP in dorsal raphe nuclei was tested separately: the difference did not reach statistical significance in this region (t=−1.36, p=0.184). In all brain regions, MDD subjects had lower BPP values compared with healthy controls (Figure 1). Standardized effect sizes for group differences were on average −0.69 (range −0.86 to −0.33) and percentage decrements were on average −18.7% (range −24.9% to −8.5%). Similar results were obtained by using cerebellar grey matter as reference region (−18.8%, average standardized effect size −0.67, main effect of group in the rmANOVA: F=3.94, p=0.056).
Mean [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 BP1 values across brain regions in healthy control subjects (□) and subjects with MDD (■) from the automated ROI analysis. Error bars represent standard deviation. AC, Anterior cingulated cortex; AMY, amygdala; ANG, angular gyrus; DLP, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; HIP, hippocampus; INS, insular cortex; MFC, medial prefrontal cortex; ORB, orbitofrontal cortex; PC, posterior cingulated cortex; DRN, dorsal raphe nuclei; SG, supramarginal gyrus; VLP, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.
Mean [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 BP1 values across brain regions in healthy control subjects (□) and subjects with MDD (■) from the automated ROI analysis. Error bars represent standard deviation. AC, Anterior cingulated cortex; AMY, amygdala; ANG, angular gyrus; DLP, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; HIP, hippocampus; INS, insular cortex; MFC, medial prefrontal cortex; ORB, orbitofrontal cortex; PC, posterior cingulated cortex; DRN, dorsal raphe nuclei; SG, supramarginal gyrus; VLP, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.
The widespread decrease in BPP values in MDD subjects compared with healthy controls was confirmed with the voxel-based analysis showing a single, very large cluster encompassing many regions of the brain known to express 5-HT1A receptors (Figure 2).
Voxel-based analysis of parametric BP1 maps revealed a single large cluster representing lower BP1 in major depressive disorder subjects compared with healthy comparison subjects (kE=123 746 voxels, cluster-level corrected p=0.013). The results are visualized on transaxial slices of the T1-weighted MRI template, and the colour bar represents the t value at the voxel level.
Voxel-based analysis of parametric BP1 maps revealed a single large cluster representing lower BP1 in major depressive disorder subjects compared with healthy comparison subjects (kE=123 746 voxels, cluster-level corrected p=0.013). The results are visualized on transaxial slices of the T1-weighted MRI template, and the colour bar represents the t value at the voxel level.
No statistically significant differences in BPND values were observed between the study groups: in the rmANOVA, the main effect of group was not statistically significant (F=0.62, p=0.436), neither was the group×region interaction (F=0.818, p=0.658). This phenomenon is consistent with MDD subjects having lower cerebellar white-matter VT values, reflecting a change in free and non-specifically bound radiotracer in the brain, and making BPND an insensitive outcome measure to detect differences in specific binding to 5-HT1A receptors.
Correlations of 5-HT1A binding potential with clinical variables
The BPP of [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 did not show significant correlations either with the BDI total scores (R=−0.15 to 0.20, p=0.399–0.996) or the HAMD total scores (R=−0.23 to −0.88, p=0.326–0.704). In a post-hoc analysis of HAMD subscores, scoring on early and late insomnia were negatively correlated with BPP in many brain regions (Table 2), suggesting that the lower the BPP, the higher was the likelihood of suffering from insomnia. Duration of illness was not associated with BPP (R=−0.02–0.20, p=0.377–0.925), nor were there any significant differences in BPP between recurrent (n=4) and first-episode patients (n=17) (t=−0.58 to 0.26, p=0.570–0.988).
Associations between [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 BP1 values and scoring on HAMD subscores representing early and late insomnia
Statistically significant associations are in bold.
BP, Binding potential; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; p, p value associated with the Spearman's correlation coefficient; ρ, Spearman's correlation coefficient.
Associations between [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 BP1 values and scoring on HAMD subscores representing early and late insomnia
Statistically significant associations are in bold.
BP, Binding potential; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; p, p value associated with the Spearman's correlation coefficient; ρ, Spearman's correlation coefficient.
Discussion
Patients with MDD manifest with a widespread reduction of serotonin 5-HT1A receptor availability in the brain, as assessed using PET and [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635. To minimize the confounding contributions of previous antidepressant or psychotherapeutic treatments, all but one patient had been never treated before. Consequently, this represents the largest sample of medication-naive MDD subjects assessed with [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 published to date. The patient sample described herein represents mild to moderate MDD with no comorbidities.
5-HT1A receptors in patients with major depression vs. healthy comparison subjects
There have been previous reports on [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 measurements with PET in subjects with MDD (Bhagwagar et al., 2004; Drevets et al., 1999; Meltzer et al., 2004; Parsey et al., 2006a; Sargent et al., 2000). These studies are summarized in Table 3. Drevets et al. (1999) studied 12 depressed patients (of whom eight were previously medicated patients with familial MDD; others were suffering from bipolar illness) and found decreased BPND values compared with controls. Sargent et al. (2000) found decreased BPND values in medication-naive (n=8), medication-free (n=8), and currently treated (n=20) patients compared with controls. Meltzer et al. (2004) studied 17 elderly patients with late-life depression, both medication-naive and previously treated, and found decreased BPP values in the dorsal raphe nuclei. Bhagwagar et al. (2004) studied 14 medication-free male subjects recovered from MDD and found persistently reduced BPND values. In contrast to previous studies, Parsey et al. (2006a) recently compared 13 medication-naive subjects with MDD to 43 healthy controls and found increased BPF and BPP, but not BPND, values throughout the brain. As a group, patients with MDD (those who had received medication and those who had not) did not differ from controls, thus implying a possible modulatory role of antidepressant drug treatment on 5-HT1A availability in MDD (Parsey et al., 2006a). While methodological issues, such as whether arterial input function was used in modelling, could theoretically explain the discrepancy between earlier studies and that by Parsey and colleagues (2006a), they are less likely to account for the contrasting findings in BPP values between the present study and that of Parsey et al. (2006a). Clinical heterogeneity regarding illness severity and duration of current depressive episode is another issue that can be held accountable for the discrepancy (Table 3).
A summary of PET imaging studies using [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 in patients with MDD experiencing a depressive episode vs. healthy comparison subjects. Numbers denote mean±s.d., n, or n/n
BP, binding potential; DRN, dorsal raphe nuclei; HAMD, 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; n.a.., not available; ↓, lower 5-HT1A binding in MDD vs. healthy controls. ↑, higher 5-HT1A binding in MDD vs. healthy controls.
With total symptom scores. b Number of untreated first-episode patients. c In drug-naive MDD patients vs. controls.
A summary of PET imaging studies using [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 in patients with MDD experiencing a depressive episode vs. healthy comparison subjects. Numbers denote mean±s.d., n, or n/n
BP, binding potential; DRN, dorsal raphe nuclei; HAMD, 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; n.a.., not available; ↓, lower 5-HT1A binding in MDD vs. healthy controls. ↑, higher 5-HT1A binding in MDD vs. healthy controls.
With total symptom scores. b Number of untreated first-episode patients. c In drug-naive MDD patients vs. controls.
Interestingly, it was recently demonstrated that adult monkeys characterized with depressive behaviour show a widespread reduction of 5-HT1A receptor availability in the brain compared to normal monkeys, as assessed using PET and [18F]MPPF, another radiotracer for 5-HT1A receptors (Shively et al., 2006). Although the similarities in the pathophysiology of depressive behaviour between monkeys and humans could be questioned, this finding lends support for a common neural substrate for liability to develop MDD that might have phylogenetic underpinnings.
5-HT1A receptors and clinical characteristics of major depression
Generally [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 availability did not correlate with BDI or HAMD total scores in any brain region in patients with MDD, although it should be emphasized that the overall severity of illness in our study ranged from mild to moderate: we cannot exclude correlations that might have occurred by including patients with more severe forms of MDD. There might also be a low threshold in the severity of MDD after which 5-HT1A receptors down-regulate. Lack of correlations suggests that reduced 5-HT1A receptor availability may represent a trait variable, that is associated with the vulnerability to develop MDD rather than with the clinical phenotype. Consistent with this view, Bhagwagar et al. (2004) found persistently reduced 5-HT1A receptor availability in euthymic males recovered from MDD, although this interpretation is limited by the fact that these patients had previously undergone SSRI drug treatment. This view is also supported by the fact that previous PET studies have generally not found correlations with symptom severity and 5-HT1A receptor availability (Table 3). However, we did find inverse correlations between [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 BP and scoring on HAMD items representing early and late insomnia: thus, lower BP was associated with a greater likelihood of suffering from insomnia. Moreover, stronger associations were found with early (trouble getting to sleep) rather than late (waking up early) insomnia (Table 2). This is congruent with the proposed role of 5-HT function in the regulation of sleep (Adrien, 2002; Sharpley and Cowen, 1995; Thase, 2006; Tsuno et al., 2005; Ursin, 2002). Indeed, 5-HT has been suggested to modulate the sleep–wake cycle through reciprocal connections between the raphe nuclei and multiple brain regions involved in the homeostatic regulation of sleep. These regions include the thalamic reticular nuclei, the preoptic/basal forebrain area, the suprachiasmatic nucleus, and hypothalamus (Ursin, 2002). Generally, it is assumed that increased 5-HT function, as indicated by increased firing of raphe neurones and increased synaptic 5-HT content, promotes wakefulness and decreased 5-HT function promotes sleep (Adrien, 2002; Ursin, 2002), and there is some direct human evidence from neuroimaging studies to support this (Derry et al., 2006). However, this concept is too simplistic in the face of the complexity of serotonergic modulation (Adrien, 2002; Ursin, 2002). As to specific receptor subtypes, stimulation of thalamic 5-HT2 receptors appears to promote wakefulness, whereas the functional role of 5-HT1A appears to depend on the regional and ultrastructural localization of the receptors (Adrien, 2002; Boutrel et al., 2002; Muraki et al., 2004; Ursin, 2002). It has been hypothesized that insomnia in depression represents a compensatory attempt to reverse deficient 5-HT function, since sleep deprivation increases 5-HT function (Adrien, 2002). Our findings of reduced post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptor availability, possibly reflecting deficient 5-HT function, associated with the probability of insomnia is compatible with this view. Regarding state vs. trait contributions, it may be that some aspects of the clinical phenotype of MDD are state-dependently modulated by 5-HT1A function and the particular facets of the wide array of symptoms under the influence of 5-HT1A may vary from one patient group to another. As an example of this, psychic and somatic anxiety was found to be differentially associated with 5-HT1A availability in a recent study of patients with MDD (Sullivan et al., 2005), whereas no such associations were detected in the present study (although patients in the present study did not have many anxiety symptoms, let alone have comorbid anxiety disorder). Taken together, however, post-hoc analyses on individual HAMD items carry a risk of type I errors through multiple comparisons and thus, these correlations must be interpreted with caution.
Lower 5-HT1A receptor availability may not be specific to MDD, but may rather represent a common trait for vulnerability towards disorders in the anxiety-depression spectrum. In support of this hypothesis, recent studies have demonstrated reduced 5-HT1A receptor availability in panic disorder (Neumeister et al., 2004) and social anxiety disorder (Lanzenberger et al., 2007). Interestingly, the study by Neumeister et al. (2004) did not find any differences between those with and without concurrent comorbid depressive episode, suggesting that the depressive phenotype does not per se additionally affect 5-HT1A levels. The exact neurobiological phenomena responsible for 5-HT1A down-regulation in anxiety-depression disorders remain to be revealed.
Methodological issues
The outcome measure BPP reflects the product of total number of receptors (Bavail), the apparent affinity for the radioligand (KD), and the fraction of radioactivity originating from free (non-protein bound) radioligand in arterial plasma (fP, ‘free fraction’). Patients with MDD had lower distribution volumes for the free and non-specifically bound radiotracer in the brain. Previously, Meltzer et al. (2004) also found lower VT[ref] in depressed patients, whereas Parsey et al. (2006a) noticed slightly higher VT[ref] in never-medicated depressed patients, as compared with control subjects. The explanation for altered VT[ref] in patients with MDD is currently unknown. At equilibrium, free radiotracer in the plasma equals the free radiotracer in the non-displaceable tissue compartment and thus, VT[ref] equals fP/fND. Altered plasma free fraction fP could theoretically contribute to this phenomenon, but previous studies have not found differences in fP between MDD subjects and healthy controls (Meltzer et al., 2004; Parsey et al., 2006a). Higher tissue free fraction fND in MDD patients remains a possibility, but cannot be directly estimated without fP measurements. These observations suggest that BPND is not an appropriate outcome measure for estimating specific binding of [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 to 5-HT1A in patients with MDD, and thus, BPP was preferred in the present study. To evaluate whether lower VT[ROI] and VT[ref] in MDD patients is secondary to faster peripheral clearance of the unchanged tracer, we calculated total peripheral clearance for each subject by dividing the injected dose with the area under the metabolite-corrected plasma curve (Hirvonen et al. 2007); however, no significant differences were noted between patients and controls (91 vs. 101 l/h respectively, p=0.198). It has been reported that the availability of [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 is unchanged by acute or chronic manipulations of endogenous synaptic 5-HT concentration in human (Moses-Kolko et al., 2007; Rabiner et al., 2002; Sargent et al., 2000), which suggests that the results may reflect receptor density, or conformational changes in the receptor structure leading to altered affinity to bind [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635.
Conclusions
In conclusion, a widespread reduction of brain 5-HT1A receptor availability was found in patients with MDD in the present study, thus confirming previous observations in a relatively large sample of medication-naive patients. Lower 5-HT1A receptor availability in MDD was not related to overall symptom severity in this sample of mild to moderate depression. It is possible that it represents a trait-dependent marker of vulnerability for depression and possibly anxiety disorders rather than directly affecting the clinical phenotype.
Acknowledgements
The staff of Turku PET Centre and the MRI Unit of Turku University Central Hospital are acknowledged for skilful assistance in performing PET and MRI scanning. This study was financially supported by Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland, and the Turku University Central Hospital (grant P3848).
Statement of Interest
Dr Hirvonen has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol–Myers Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, and Novartis, congress travel grants from AstraZeneca and Lundbeck, and research funding from Orion Pharma and Lundbeck. Dr Karlsson has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, and Wyeth. Dr Markkula has received lecture fees from Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen-Cilag. Dr Hietala has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol–Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, and Lundbeck, congress travel grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol–Myers Squibb, and Eli Lilly, and has acted as a consultant for Orion Pharma.
