DEVICE-MEASURED SEDENTARY PATTERNS AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY BEFORE AND DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Actigraphy can objectively measure sleep in studies on Bipolar Disorder (BD) where subjective sleep ratings might be influenced by affect. Actigraphy data are complex necessitating data reduction approaches. We created a composite score of actigraphy sleep metrics (total sleep time [TST], wake after sleep onset [WASO], and percent sleep [PS]) in BD. We computed z-scores of sleep measures for n=51 BD vs. n=80 healthy subjects and averaged scores. We examined associations with participant characteristics and used LASSO to identify metrics best explaining composite variability. Higher composite scores (better sleep) were seen in employed vs. unemployed (t=2.40, df=34, p=0.02), and correlated with higher medication load (r=0.41, p=0.004), lower mania symptomatology (r=-0.33, p=0.04) and lower interleukin (IL)-6 levels (r=-0.32, p=0.02). TST best explained variability in medication load and PS best explained employment, mania symptoms and IL-6. Given observed spe-cificity of associations, selecting theory-driven sleep metrics may be more appropriate than a composite. time including time spent in various domains of activity; Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Disease Health in Older Women (OPACH), an epidemiologic study with device and self-report measures of sedentary behavior; and an ongoing clinical trial, the Healthy Aging Resources to Thrive (HART) study with device and self-reported data on sitting time and patterns as well as physical activity. The first session in this symposium will present a description of the rates of meeting the aerobic, strength, and balance recommendations among older adults in the ACT study. Next, we will have a presentation describing sedentary activities in older adults by age, sex and device-based sitting patterns in the ACT study. In the third presentation we will use OPACH data to examine patterns and context of sedentary in relation to aging-related outcomes. Finally, we will describe changes in physical activity and sedentary time in the HART trial in the cohort enrolled prior to the COVID-19 pandemic vs. those enrolled during the pandemic. Our Discussant will provide new insights on the roles of sedentary behavior and physical activity in aging and health. objective levels of sitting time (ST), patterns of ST, and physical activity (PA) among older adults to the -19 used the to Trial to examine differences in activPAL-assessed ST, standing time, breaks in enrollees (N % % Mean BMI female The activities that compose older adults’ considerable sedentary time are not well characterized. We described daily time spent in self-reported sedentary activities and explored differences by age, gender, and activPAL sitting patterns. Participants self-reported a total of 10.7 hours of sitting time and spent the most time watching TV (2.6 hrs/ day), using the computer (1.7 hrs/day), and reading (1.6 hrs/ day). Women spent more time watching TV, engaged in hob-bies, and socializing and less time on the computer compared to men. Older participants spent more time watching TV, reading, and participating in group activities and less time on the computer than younger participants. Those with low activPAL sitting time and frequent activPAL sitting breaks (low mean bout duration) ~1 hr /day less watching TV than those with high activPAL sitting time. These findings help illuminate future intervention targets and lay the path to ex-plore associations between different sedentary activities and health. Excessive sedentary behavior (SB) is related to deleterious health outcomes. Understanding the patterns and con-texts in which SB accumulates can promote healthy aging. Daily sitting time and mean sitting bout duration (MBD) were measured by triaxial accelerometers. Participants self-reported how much time they spent sitting while: watching TV, reading, using the computer, driving, working, or taking phone calls. Data were compared across aging-related characteristics. Age-adjusted sitting time (minutes/day) and and teams using


PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND SEDENTARY BEHAVIOR PATTERNS PRIOR TO AND DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Chair: Nancy Gell Co-Chair: Dori Rosenberg Discussant: John Bellettiere Understanding patterns in the types of activities older adults engage in during physical activity and sedentary time could help shape intervention designs. Few studies have adequately described the physical activity and sedentary pursuits older adults undertake, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. To answer these questions, this symposium uses data from three recent studies: Adult Changes in Thought (ACT),an epidemiologic study with self-reported and device-based measures of physical activity and sedentary time including time spent in various domains of activity; Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Disease Health in Older Women (OPACH), an epidemiologic study with device and self-report measures of sedentary behavior; and an ongoing clinical trial, the Healthy Aging Resources to Thrive (HART) study with device and self-reported data on sitting time and patterns as well as physical activity. The first session in this symposium will present a description of the rates of meeting the aerobic, strength, and balance recommendations among older adults in the ACT study. Next, we will have a presentation describing sedentary activities in older adults by age, sex and device-based sitting patterns in the ACT study. In the third presentation we will use OPACH data to examine patterns and context of sedentary in relation to aging-related outcomes. Finally, we will describe changes in physical activity and sedentary time in the HART trial in the cohort enrolled prior to the COVID-19 pandemic vs. those enrolled during the pandemic. Our Discussant will provide new insights on the roles of sedentary behavior and physical activity in aging and health.

DEVICE-MEASURED SEDENTARY PATTERNS AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY BEFORE AND DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman, 1 Jing Zhou, 2 Julie Cooper, 3 David Arterburn, 2 Andrea Cook, 2 and Dori Rosenberg, 2 , 1. Kaiser Permanente Washington,Seattle,Washington,United States,2. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute,Seattle,Washington,United States,3. kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute,Seattle,Washington,United States Little is known about objective levels of sitting time (ST), patterns of ST, and physical activity (PA) among older adults before compared to during the COVID -19 pandemic. We used data from the Healthy Aging Resources to Thrive Trial to examine differences in activPAL-assessed ST, standing time, breaks from sitting, and steps in study enrollees prior to March 2020 (N = 97, % female = 60.8, % white = 81.4; Mean BMI = 35.2) compared to post-March 2020 (N = 47, % female = 70.2, % white = 72.3; Mean BMI = 36.1). During the pandemic, participants had higher sitting time (Mean = 11.5 vs. 10.7 hours/day), fewer breaks from sitting (Mean = 40 vs. 44 breaks/day), and fewer steps (Mean = 4441 vs. 5931 steps/day) than prior to the pandemic. Interventions may be needed to support older adults with obesity in recovering losses in time spent physically active. Little is known about whether older adults meet the recommended physical activity (PA) guidelines, including aerobic, strength, and balance components. Given this gap, we examined self-report PA data from 1,352 older adult participants of the Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) study. We classified participants as meeting some components, meeting the full guidelines, or being insufficiently active. Multinomial regression was used to identify factors associated with meeting PA guidelines. Despite performing 9.5 hours of weekly PA, only 11% met the full guidelines, 13% met the aerobic, and 26% met the balance or strength recommendations. Increasing age and body mass index, needing assistance with instrumental daily activities, heart disease, and low income were associated with decreased odds of meeting PA guidelines. Older adults primarily perform aerobic PA and lower intensity PA with fewer participating in strength and balance activities. Interventions targeting strength, balance, and higher intensity PA should be developed. The activities that compose older adults' considerable sedentary time are not well characterized. We described daily time spent in self-reported sedentary activities and explored differences by age, gender, and activPAL sitting patterns. Participants self-reported a total of 10.7 hours of sitting time and spent the most time watching TV (2.6 hrs/ day), using the computer (1.7 hrs/day), and reading (1.6 hrs/ day). Women spent more time watching TV, engaged in hobbies, and socializing and less time on the computer compared to men. Older participants spent more time watching TV, reading, and participating in group activities and less time on the computer than younger participants. Those with low activPAL sitting time and frequent activPAL sitting breaks (low mean bout duration) ~1 hr /day less watching TV than those with high activPAL sitting time. These findings help illuminate future intervention targets and lay the path to explore associations between different sedentary activities and health. Excessive sedentary behavior (SB) is related to deleterious health outcomes. Understanding the patterns and contexts in which SB accumulates can promote healthy aging. Daily sitting time and mean sitting bout duration (MBD) were measured by triaxial accelerometers. Participants selfreported how much time they spent sitting while: watching TV, reading, using the computer, driving, working, or taking phone calls. Data were compared across aging-related characteristics. Age-adjusted sitting time (minutes/day) for 5,838 diverse (33.2% Black, 16.9% Hispanic), older women (mean age 78.7±6.7) were 577.2 for Hispanic women, 630.3 for Black women, and 632.0 for White women. Those in the lowest vs. highest physical function category had the longest MBD (16.1 vs. 11.7 minutes/bout). Watching television was the most common self-reported sedentary activity. The highest vs. lowest quartile of MBD spent, on average, 30.6 and 22.3 minutes/day watching television, respectively. This presentation will illuminate critical factors associated with sitting patterns in older adults.

PRESIDENTIAL SYMPOSIUM: FROM GLOBAL TO LOCAL: AN AGE-INCLUSIVE AND RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH TO GERONTOLOGICAL EDUCATION Chair: Dana Bradley Co-Chair: Judith Howe
In June 2020, the Gerontological Society of America (GSA) joined in solidarity in the movement to condemn the entrenched racism undermining American society and build upon a gero-rich international historical base of supporting human rights. However, as gerontological educators, we need to expand on the conversation of racism to the broader global discussion of inclusivity and elimination of discrimination. A global focus on human rights of older persons, which began in 1982 at the World Assembly on Aging and has led to the current discussion of the proposed UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons. The Academy of Gerontology in Higher Education (AGHE) is GSA's education group of colleges and universities that offers education, training, curricular innovations, and research programs in the field of aging. The work of this group is grounded in an age-inclusive and rights-based perspective, and members are committed to an international view demonstrated through AGHE's tagline Global Leaders in Advancing Education on Aging; This symposium explores the role of age-inclusivity and a rights-based perspective in gerontology and geriatrics education and offers both challenges and best practices for moving forward. The first presentation explores the meaning of age-inclusivity in aging education in a global context and asks how do we build upon our international roots? Our second presenter shares a proposed framework for a rights-based approach to gerontology education. The third presentation explores an example of a rights-based training program. We conclude with a lively discussion focusing on how to take action through education.

A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTING A RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH TO GERONTOLOGICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING
Laura Allen, 1 and Dana Bradley, 2 , 1. Ramat Gat,Tel Aviv,Israel,2. UMBC Erickson School of Aging Studies,Baltimore,Maryland,United States This paper uses the nine general principles that underpin human rights (Non-discrimination, Respect, Dignity, Autonomy, Equality, Self-fulfillment and Personal development, Full and effective participation, Intergenerational solidarity, and Recognition of intrinsic value and worth as a human being) to frame a right's based approach. This framework looks beyond the older person and the issues they are facing to the structure and culture of the society itself and the ways in which it is contributing to challenges. Using this lens, we will discuss how to develop definitions and standards of right's-based education that are culturally and contextually appropriate, define right's based competencies and recognize, that despite the universal rights of older persons, the implementation may need to be adjusted for unique sociocultural environments. . Lastly we will outline a strategy to identify and train multidisciplinary teaching and research teams using this proposed framework.

PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN GERONTOLOGICAL EDUCATION
Rona Karasik, 1 and Judith Howe, 2 , 1. Saint Cloud State University, SAINT CLOUD,Minnesota,United States,2. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,New York,New York,United States The rights of older persons, essential to our work as gerontologists, were discussed in the World Assembly on Aging (1982) and adopted through the United Nations Principles of Older Persons and followed by the Madrid International Plan