Measuring Dyadic Interactions and Dining Environment in Dementia Mealtime Care: A Systematic Review of Instruments

Abstract It is critical to use validated instruments to assess mealtime dyadic interactions and dining environment for people with dementia to evaluate the process and efficacy of mealtime interventions. However, the quantity and psychometric quality of such instruments are unknown. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the quantity and quality of instruments that assess dyadic interactions, physical environment, and/or social environment during dementia mealtime care. We searched Pubmed, CINAHL, AgeLine, PsychINFO, and Cochrane Library for records published between 1980-2020. Records were eligible if they included any instrument assessing concepts of interest (i.e., mealtime dyadic interactions, physical and/or social dining environment). From eligible records, eligible instruments originally developed or later modified to measure concepts of interest were identified, and instruments’ characteristics were extracted: 1) development process, 2) concept/construct assessed, 3) sample/setting, 4) administration method, 5) item description, 6) scoring format/interpretation, 7) reliability, and 8) validity. A newly developed tool was used to evaluate instruments’ psychometric quality. In total, 26 eligible instruments were identified. Seventeen instruments assessed dyadic interactions, 1 assessed only physical environment, and 8 assessed physical & social environment. All instruments were observational tools and scored as having low psychometric quality. Reasons for low psychometric quality included use of small sample size compared to the number of items, limited psychometric testing, and inadequate estimates. A number of instruments were developed and/or used to assess dyadic interactions, physical and/or social environment in dementia mealtime care. All instruments warrant further testing to accumulate psychometric evidence in larger diverse samples in different care settings.

Increasing attention has been paid to the potential role of care planning in buffering future eldercare challenges.However, little is known about the characteristics of care planning among Chinese ageing families.It is also of interest to reflect how recent events such as COVID-19 pandemic may affect their views of the future care planning.From a family systems perspective, this study explored the extent, processes, and contents of intergenerational care planning of Chinese ageing families in Hong Kong.Dyadic interviews were conducted with 60 adult child-older parent pairs, and individual interviews were conducted with another 33 adult children.Intergenerational discrepancies in extent and processes of care planning, intergenerational congruence of care expectations and struggles, facilitating role of family capital and hindering role of cultural capital in care planning were primary themes.Although both generations demonstrated strong awareness of future eldercare needs, they were found engaged in different levels and processes of care planning.Adult children's level of engagement in planning activities may influence parents' extent and contents of care planning.Intergenerational transmission of eldercare values contributed to intergenerational congruence of care expectations but also led to similar struggles and ambivalent attitudes toward future care.Moreover, family capital was found to facilitate family care planning while Chinese cultural values that emphasize family care may hinder both generations' efforts in care planning.The findings will deepen our understanding on characteristics of intergenerational care planning in Asian Chinese communities and inform services to improve adult children and ageing parents' preparation for future eldercare.It is critical to use validated instruments to assess mealtime dyadic interactions and dining environment for people with dementia to evaluate the process and efficacy of mealtime interventions.However, the quantity and psychometric quality of such instruments are unknown.This systematic review aimed to synthesize the quantity and quality of instruments that assess dyadic interactions, physical environment, and/or social environment during dementia mealtime care.We searched Pubmed, CINAHL, AgeLine, PsychINFO, and Cochrane Library for records published between 1980-2020.Records were eligible if they included any instrument assessing concepts of interest (i.e., mealtime dyadic interactions, physical and/or social dining environment).From eligible records, eligible instruments originally developed or later modified to measure concepts of interest were identified, and instruments' characteristics were extracted: 1) development process, 2) concept/construct assessed, 3) sample/setting, 4) administration method, 5) item description, 6) scoring format/interpretation, 7) reliability, and 8) validity.A newly developed tool was used to evaluate instruments' psychometric quality.In total, 26 eligible instruments were identified.Seventeen instruments assessed dyadic interactions, 1 assessed only physical environment, and 8 assessed physical & social environment.All instruments were observational tools and scored as having low psychometric quality.Reasons for low psychometric quality included use of small sample size compared to the number of items, limited psychometric testing, and inadequate estimates.A number of instruments were developed and/or used to assess dyadic interactions, physical and/or social environment in dementia mealtime care.All instruments warrant further testing to accumulate psychometric evidence in larger diverse samples in different care settings.

ronment, and/or social environment during dementia mealtime care.We
earched Pubmed, CINAHL, AgeLine, PsychINFO, and Cochrane Library for records published between 1980-2020.Records were eligible if they included any instrument assessing concepts of interest (i.e., mealtime dyadic interactions, physical and/or social dining environment).From eligible records, eligible instruments originally developed or later modified to measure concepts of interest were identified, and instruments' characteristics were extracted: 1) development process, 2) concept/construct assessed, 3) sample/setting, 4) administration method, 5) item description, 6) scoring format/interpretation, 7) reliability, and 8) validity.A newly developed tool was used to evaluate instruments' psychometric quality.In total, 26 eligible instruments were identified.Seventeen instruments assessed dyadic interactions, 1 assessed only physical environment, and 8 assessed physical & social environment.All instruments were observational tools and scored as having low psychometric quality.Reasons for low psychometric quality included use of small sample size compared to the number of items, limited psychometric testing, and inadequate estimates.A number of instruments were developed and/or used to assess dyadic interactions, physical and/or social environment in dementia mealtime care.All instruments warrant further testing to accumulate psychometric evidence in larger diverse samples in different care settings.


MEASURING DYADIC INTERACTIONS AND DINING ENVIRONMENT IN DEMENTIA MEALTIME CARE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF INSTRUMENTS


PATTERNS OF INTERGENERATIONAL CARE PLANNING AMONG CHINESE AGING FAMILIES IN HONG KONG

Xue Bai, 1 Chang Liu, 2 and Tongling Xu, 2 1.The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 2. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Care planning before the onset of intensive care needs can increase families' ability to manage caregiving crises and cope with care transitions.However, future care planning has not been substantially examined in a family context.Drawing on the model of Preparation for Future Care Needs and a family systems perspective, this study investigated patterns of intergenerational care planning across multiple planning domains (awareness, avoidance, information gathering, decision making, and concrete planning) among Chinese intergenerational pairs.Quantitative data of 213 pairs of aging parents and adult children were collected in Hong Kong.Latent Profile Analysis was conducted to examine typological structure underlying care planning patterns.Three patterns were discovered: filial-maximal, dyadic-moderate, and filial-minimal.Profile 1 contained approximately 9.9% of pairs, which demonstrated a relatively higher level of avoidance on considering the need of care preparation and engaged less in concrete planning activities.Profile 2 contained 68.5% of intergenerational pairs that had a moderate preparation level.Profile 3 contained 21.6% of intergenerational pairs that were comparatively active in care planning.The findings also indicated that although older adults across three groups demonstrated a similar level of awareness to prepare for future care, their engagement in the

Session 4380 (Paper) Dyadic Research (BSS Paper) FUTURE ELDERCARE PLANNING AMONG CHINESE AGING FAMILIES IN HONG KONG

Xue Bai, 1 Joanne Luk, 2 Ranran He, 2 and Yanyee Kwong, 2 1.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, HongKong, 2. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, HongKong, Hong Kong



WEN LIU, 1 and Sohyun Kim, 2 1.The University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 2. University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Innovation inAging, 2021, Vol. 5, No. S1

PATTERNS OF INTERGENERATIONAL CARE PLANNING AMONG CHINESE AGING FAMILIES IN HONG KONG
Xue Bai, 1 Chang Liu, 2 and Tongling Xu, 2 1.The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 2. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Care planning before the onset of intensive care needs can increase families' ability to manage caregiving crises and cope with care transitions.However, future care planning has not been substantially examined in a family context.Drawing on the model of Preparation for Future Care Needs and a family systems perspective, this study investigated patterns of intergenerational care planning across multiple planning domains (awareness, avoidance, information gathering, decision making, and concrete planning) among Chinese intergenerational pairs.Quantitative data of 213 pairs of aging parents and adult children were collected in Hong Kong.Latent Profile Analysis was conducted to examine typological structure underlying care planning patterns.Three patterns were discovered: filial-maximal, dyadic-moderate, and filial-minimal.Profile 1 contained approximately 9.9% of pairs, which demonstrated a relatively higher level of avoidance on considering the need of care preparation and engaged less in concrete planning activities.Profile 2 contained 68.5% of intergenerational pairs that had a moderate preparation level.Profile 3 contained 21.6% of intergenerational pairs that were comparatively active in care planning.The findings also indicated that although older adults across three groups demonstrated a similar level of awareness to prepare for future care, their engagement in the
WEN LIU, 1 and Sohyun Kim, 2 1.The University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 2. University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States


