Abstract

Background

This study assessed recreational physical activity type and context preferences of Emirati university students.

Method

This was a cross-sectional study in which a stratified random sample (n=628) (female 69.1%, male 30.9% mean age 20.79±3.81 y) completed an online survey. Relationships between gender and preferences were assessed using regression analysis, adjusted for body mass index and age.

Results

Activities with a fun element were the most preferred context (87.1%). Walking (66.7%) and swimming (61.7%) were the most preferred activity types. Males had significantly higher odds of preferring competitive activities, and activity types such as football, fitness/weights and jogging. Females had significantly higher odds of preferring activities with people of the same gender, with supervision and done at home, and activity types such as walking, aerobics, cycling, squash and yoga.

Conclusion

These results can inform physical activity planning for university students in the United Arab Emirates. Fun activity opportunities involving walking or swimming and in the local neighbourhood may be popular for both males and females. Future research could explore uptake and maintenance of activity options, based on preferred activity attributes.

Introduction

Participation in physical activity is associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, breast cancer, colon cancer, gestational diabetes, ischaemic heart disease and ischaemic stroke.1 Physical activity is also associated with a range of psychological health benefits, including reduced risk of depression,2,3 anxiety3 and stress,2,3 and improved mood.2 Among university students, previous research has identified a positive association between physical activity participation and academic performance4,5 and retention.6 Despite these benefits, university students typically report low physical activity participation, with 30–50% meeting physical activity guidelines7,8 and with females being less active than males.79 International research in adult populations has identified prevalence of meeting physical activity guidelines ranging from 56.9% in Belgium to 86.2% in Hong Kong.10 A systematic review of physical activity research in the oil-producing countries of the Arabian Gulf (United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and Saudi Arabia) indicated low physical activity.11 Low levels of physical activity have also been reported in Saudi university students,12,13 with females being less active than males.12,13 Low physical activity has significant implications for the health and well-being of adults in this region. In the adult population of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), obesity rose from 21.8% in 2000 to 31.7% in 2016.14 Non-communicable diseases, many of which are inactivity-related, are the cause of 65% of all deaths in the 30–70 y age group in the UAE.15

It is likely that interventions to increase participation in recreational physical activity will be more successful if they suit the preferences of the intended population. For example, individuals’ physical activity type preferences have been linked to adherence and retention.16 Studies examining activity preferences have tended to adopt a narrow contextual focus (e.g., alone vs in groups, with an instructor vs no instructor) or to focus on preference for activity types (e.g., walking, swimming). Few studies have examined more broadly the physical activity context and type preferences of university students. One study found that both male and female Canadian university students preferred exercise with others outside of a structured class.17 Gender differences have been demonstrated in Australian university students’ preferences. One study noted that females prefer group exercise and that males prefer no assistance.18 Studies on physical activity types have reported that males prefer weightlifting and team sports whereas females prefer aerobics, walking, dance and yoga,18 and that male students prefer team sports while female students prefer indoor, gymnasium-based activities (yoga, aerobics and dancing) and walking outside.19

There has been limited research on the recreational physical activity preferences of Arab university students. One study with Saudi university students assessed preferences for physical activity type and found that walking was the most preferred physical activity (70%), followed by jogging (49%), weightlifting (31%), football (29%) and swimming (18%).12 However, there has been no research on context preferences. Research from Western countries may not be applicable to Arab countries due to distinct social-cultural differences. Socio-cultural norms and family values may have an important influence on physical activity preferences, particularly among female Emirati university students. Past research has, for example, noted specific barriers for females associated with needing permission to walk alone or attend social gatherings, and socio-cultural norms limiting outdoor exercise,20 which may influence physical activity preferences. To facilitate the design of potentially appealing and culturally appropriate recreational physical activity interventions for Emirati university students, more research is needed to understand the physical activity preferences of this group. The aim of the current study was to assess physical activity context and physical activity type preferred by Emirati university students, and to assess potential differences by gender.

Materials and methods

Sample and procedure

This was a cross-sectional study in which a stratified random sample of Emirati national university students (n=628) completed a self-administered online survey assessing preferences for recreational physical activity context and type. The student population of the university was 21 754 for the 2016–2017 academic year. Based on achieving a representative sample with 4% margin of error and 95% CI, a sample of 585 was targeted. Past unpublished research conducted by the authors with the same population obtained response rates of 41%. Anticipating a response rate of 40%, the study invitation (including participant information sheet and informed consent) was sent to 1462 students (50% female, 50% male) randomly selected from the university student database. The e-mail study invitation contained a link to the online questionnaire. Survey completion was taken as informed consent. All participants were recruited from a higher education institute in the Middle East. The university offers undergraduate programmes and has separate campuses for males and females. Study inclusion criteria were: male or female aged >18 y, UAE national and native Arabic speaker.

Materials

Recreational physical activity context preferences were assessed using a questionnaire adapted from previous research.21 The original questionnaire had 19 items that assessed preference for format (how), location (where) and social setting (with whom) in which physical activity occurred. The wording of two items was changed: ‘are not just about exercise’ was changed to ‘include a fun element’, and ‘are done with one or two others’ was changed to ‘are done with an exercise buddy/partner’. Four new items were added to extend data collection: ‘I can choose the intensity’, ‘are done with people who have the same health condition as I do’, ‘are done at my workplace’ and ‘are done at the university’. An additional response option (not applicable) was added for the last three items given that they may not be applicable to all respondents. The questionnaire was then translated to Arabic using recommended procedures.22,23 The final Physical Activity Context Preference Questionnaire-Arabic (PAC-A) asked people to indicate their extent of agreement/disagreement with each of 23 physical activity contexts. Items assessed how (e.g., ‘I prefer activities that are vigorous’), where (‘I prefer activities that are done at the university’) and with whom (e.g., ‘I prefer activities that are done with people of my own gender’) people prefer to participate in physical activity. Responses were indicated on a five-point Likert scale: strongly agree, agree, no preference, disagree, strongly disagree.

To assess preference for recreational physical activity types, respondents were asked which activities they would like to start or to do more of from a list of 14 physical activity types (e.g., football, swimming, yoga). Respondents were allowed to make multiple responses. Similar items have been used in previous studies.18,24

Participants completed demographic information on age (y), gender, height and weight (used to derive body mass index [BMI]), living situation (single and living alone, single and living with family, married and living with partner, other), and if they had children (yes, no). Some data were categorised for descriptive purposes; e.g., age was reported in blocks of 18–20 y, 21–24 y and ≥25 y; BMI was reported in categories using recommended groupings of <18.5 kg/m2=underweight, 18.5–25 kg/m2=healthy weight, 25–30 kg/m2=overweight and >30 kg/m2=obese.25

Statistical analyses

All data were exported into IBM (Armonk, NY, USA) SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 24. Ten per cent of the data entered were checked for accuracy and no errors were found. Responses for context preference were collapsed into three categories (strongly disagree/disagree=disagree; neither agree nor disagree=neutral; strongly agree/agree=agree) for descriptive statistics. The five most commonly preferred physical activity contexts and physical activity types are reported. Gender differences were explored using binary logistic regressions conducted on participant responses dichotomised into preferred (strongly agree and agree) and not preferred (neither agree nor disagree, disagree and strongly disagree), adjusting for BMI and age.

Results

Of the 1462 students invited to participate in the study, 628 completed the questionnaire (response rate 43%). The majority of the sample were female (69.1%) and the mean age of participants was 20.79 (SD 3.81) y. Over half of the respondents (57.64%) were aged 18–20 y and the remainder were aged 21–24 y (34.39%) or ≥25 y (7.96%). Approximately 40% of the sample were overweight or obese. Most of the participants lived at home with their families and had no children. Additional characteristics of the participants are described in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of participants (n=628)

AllFemaleMale
Characteristicsn%n%n%
Gender628100.043469.119430.9
Age group (y)
 18–2036257.6425358.2910956.19
 21–2421634.3915335.256332.47
 25+507.96286.452211.34
Self-reported body mass index (kg/m2)
 Underweight (<18.5)7812.426414.75147.22
 Healthy weight (18.5–25)29947.6122652.077337.63
 Overweight (25–30)12519.906915.905628.87
 Obese (>30)12620.067517.285126.29
Living situation
 Single and live alone91.4320.4673.61
 Single and live with family55187.7437987.3317288.66
 Married and live with partner507.96388.76126.19
 Other182.87153.4631.55
Children
 Yes345.41225.07126.19
 No59494.5941294.9318293.81
AllFemaleMale
Characteristicsn%n%n%
Gender628100.043469.119430.9
Age group (y)
 18–2036257.6425358.2910956.19
 21–2421634.3915335.256332.47
 25+507.96286.452211.34
Self-reported body mass index (kg/m2)
 Underweight (<18.5)7812.426414.75147.22
 Healthy weight (18.5–25)29947.6122652.077337.63
 Overweight (25–30)12519.906915.905628.87
 Obese (>30)12620.067517.285126.29
Living situation
 Single and live alone91.4320.4673.61
 Single and live with family55187.7437987.3317288.66
 Married and live with partner507.96388.76126.19
 Other182.87153.4631.55
Children
 Yes345.41225.07126.19
 No59494.5941294.9318293.81
Table 1.

Characteristics of participants (n=628)

AllFemaleMale
Characteristicsn%n%n%
Gender628100.043469.119430.9
Age group (y)
 18–2036257.6425358.2910956.19
 21–2421634.3915335.256332.47
 25+507.96286.452211.34
Self-reported body mass index (kg/m2)
 Underweight (<18.5)7812.426414.75147.22
 Healthy weight (18.5–25)29947.6122652.077337.63
 Overweight (25–30)12519.906915.905628.87
 Obese (>30)12620.067517.285126.29
Living situation
 Single and live alone91.4320.4673.61
 Single and live with family55187.7437987.3317288.66
 Married and live with partner507.96388.76126.19
 Other182.87153.4631.55
Children
 Yes345.41225.07126.19
 No59494.5941294.9318293.81
AllFemaleMale
Characteristicsn%n%n%
Gender628100.043469.119430.9
Age group (y)
 18–2036257.6425358.2910956.19
 21–2421634.3915335.256332.47
 25+507.96286.452211.34
Self-reported body mass index (kg/m2)
 Underweight (<18.5)7812.426414.75147.22
 Healthy weight (18.5–25)29947.6122652.077337.63
 Overweight (25–30)12519.906915.905628.87
 Obese (>30)12620.067517.285126.29
Living situation
 Single and live alone91.4320.4673.61
 Single and live with family55187.7437987.3317288.66
 Married and live with partner507.96388.76126.19
 Other182.87153.4631.55
Children
 Yes345.41225.07126.19
 No59494.5941294.9318293.81

Activity context preferences are presented in Table 2. The most commonly preferred contexts for recreational physical activity participation for the whole sample (>73%) were those that: include a fun element, the individual can choose the intensity, can be done on one’s own, are done at a fixed time/scheduled and involve little or no cost. Male students also reported a common preference for activities that include a social aspect and that can be done in the local neighbourhood or area. Female students reported a common preference for activities that can be done with people of the same gender. After adjustment for BMI and age, results showed that male students were more likely than females to prefer physical activity contexts that involve competition (OR=1.7; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.4; p=0.07) and female students were more likely than males to prefer physical activity contexts that are with people of the same gender (OR=1.9; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.8; p=0.001), supervised (OR=1.8; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.6; p=0.001) and that are done at home (OR=1.8; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.5; p=0.002). No significant gender differences were found for preference for any of the other contexts.

Table 2.

Preference for physical activity context, by gender (n=628)

Total (n=628)Male (n=194)Female (n=434)
ANDANDAND
%%%%%%%%%
How:
 Include a fun element87.18.94.084.09.36.788.58.82.8
 I can choose the intensity73.618.87.674.217.58.273.319.47.4
 Are done at a fixed time, i.e., scheduled sessions72.817.89.468.620.610.874.716.68.8
 Involve little or no cost72.518.98.669.622.77.773.717.39.0
 Are structured with a set routine or format69.622.18.368.622.29.370.022.17.8
 Are vigorous68.024.87.269.622.77.767.325.86.9
 Are supervised, e.g., by a leader*67.819.113.159.324.216.571.716.811.5
 Include a social aspect67.523.78.870.123.26.766.424.09.7
 Involve competition*59.727.213.168.626.84.655.827.416.8
 Require skill and practice59.726.613.761.327.311.359.026.314.7
Where:
 Are done in my neighbourhood/local area71.320.58.170.123.26.771.919.48.8
 Are done outdoors64.225.610.262.429.48.265.024.011.1
 Are done at the university59.623.413.460.325.89.359.222.415.2
 Are done at home*53.328.018.642.829.927.358.127.214.7
 Are done at my workplace45.727.421.042.333.516.547.224.723.0
With whom:
 Are done on my own72.920.26.871.620.18.273.520.36.2
 Are done with people of my own gender*71.019.19.961.327.810.875.315.29.4
 Are done with an exercise partner/buddy66.722.810.567.523.78.866.422.411.3
 Are done with people who have the same health condition as I do64.222.810.264.421.19.364.123.510.6
 Are done with people at my level of ability63.523.413.169.120.110.861.124.914.1
 Are done with people my age63.224.512.362.426.311.363.623.712.7
 Are done in a small group (e.g., 3–6 people)62.124.813.164.923.211.960.825.613.6
 Are team-based52.531.116.457.230.412.450.531.318.2
Total (n=628)Male (n=194)Female (n=434)
ANDANDAND
%%%%%%%%%
How:
 Include a fun element87.18.94.084.09.36.788.58.82.8
 I can choose the intensity73.618.87.674.217.58.273.319.47.4
 Are done at a fixed time, i.e., scheduled sessions72.817.89.468.620.610.874.716.68.8
 Involve little or no cost72.518.98.669.622.77.773.717.39.0
 Are structured with a set routine or format69.622.18.368.622.29.370.022.17.8
 Are vigorous68.024.87.269.622.77.767.325.86.9
 Are supervised, e.g., by a leader*67.819.113.159.324.216.571.716.811.5
 Include a social aspect67.523.78.870.123.26.766.424.09.7
 Involve competition*59.727.213.168.626.84.655.827.416.8
 Require skill and practice59.726.613.761.327.311.359.026.314.7
Where:
 Are done in my neighbourhood/local area71.320.58.170.123.26.771.919.48.8
 Are done outdoors64.225.610.262.429.48.265.024.011.1
 Are done at the university59.623.413.460.325.89.359.222.415.2
 Are done at home*53.328.018.642.829.927.358.127.214.7
 Are done at my workplace45.727.421.042.333.516.547.224.723.0
With whom:
 Are done on my own72.920.26.871.620.18.273.520.36.2
 Are done with people of my own gender*71.019.19.961.327.810.875.315.29.4
 Are done with an exercise partner/buddy66.722.810.567.523.78.866.422.411.3
 Are done with people who have the same health condition as I do64.222.810.264.421.19.364.123.510.6
 Are done with people at my level of ability63.523.413.169.120.110.861.124.914.1
 Are done with people my age63.224.512.362.426.311.363.623.712.7
 Are done in a small group (e.g., 3–6 people)62.124.813.164.923.211.960.825.613.6
 Are team-based52.531.116.457.230.412.450.531.318.2

*Significant gender difference (p<0.05).

A=agree; N=neither agree nor disagree; D=disagree.

Table 2.

Preference for physical activity context, by gender (n=628)

Total (n=628)Male (n=194)Female (n=434)
ANDANDAND
%%%%%%%%%
How:
 Include a fun element87.18.94.084.09.36.788.58.82.8
 I can choose the intensity73.618.87.674.217.58.273.319.47.4
 Are done at a fixed time, i.e., scheduled sessions72.817.89.468.620.610.874.716.68.8
 Involve little or no cost72.518.98.669.622.77.773.717.39.0
 Are structured with a set routine or format69.622.18.368.622.29.370.022.17.8
 Are vigorous68.024.87.269.622.77.767.325.86.9
 Are supervised, e.g., by a leader*67.819.113.159.324.216.571.716.811.5
 Include a social aspect67.523.78.870.123.26.766.424.09.7
 Involve competition*59.727.213.168.626.84.655.827.416.8
 Require skill and practice59.726.613.761.327.311.359.026.314.7
Where:
 Are done in my neighbourhood/local area71.320.58.170.123.26.771.919.48.8
 Are done outdoors64.225.610.262.429.48.265.024.011.1
 Are done at the university59.623.413.460.325.89.359.222.415.2
 Are done at home*53.328.018.642.829.927.358.127.214.7
 Are done at my workplace45.727.421.042.333.516.547.224.723.0
With whom:
 Are done on my own72.920.26.871.620.18.273.520.36.2
 Are done with people of my own gender*71.019.19.961.327.810.875.315.29.4
 Are done with an exercise partner/buddy66.722.810.567.523.78.866.422.411.3
 Are done with people who have the same health condition as I do64.222.810.264.421.19.364.123.510.6
 Are done with people at my level of ability63.523.413.169.120.110.861.124.914.1
 Are done with people my age63.224.512.362.426.311.363.623.712.7
 Are done in a small group (e.g., 3–6 people)62.124.813.164.923.211.960.825.613.6
 Are team-based52.531.116.457.230.412.450.531.318.2
Total (n=628)Male (n=194)Female (n=434)
ANDANDAND
%%%%%%%%%
How:
 Include a fun element87.18.94.084.09.36.788.58.82.8
 I can choose the intensity73.618.87.674.217.58.273.319.47.4
 Are done at a fixed time, i.e., scheduled sessions72.817.89.468.620.610.874.716.68.8
 Involve little or no cost72.518.98.669.622.77.773.717.39.0
 Are structured with a set routine or format69.622.18.368.622.29.370.022.17.8
 Are vigorous68.024.87.269.622.77.767.325.86.9
 Are supervised, e.g., by a leader*67.819.113.159.324.216.571.716.811.5
 Include a social aspect67.523.78.870.123.26.766.424.09.7
 Involve competition*59.727.213.168.626.84.655.827.416.8
 Require skill and practice59.726.613.761.327.311.359.026.314.7
Where:
 Are done in my neighbourhood/local area71.320.58.170.123.26.771.919.48.8
 Are done outdoors64.225.610.262.429.48.265.024.011.1
 Are done at the university59.623.413.460.325.89.359.222.415.2
 Are done at home*53.328.018.642.829.927.358.127.214.7
 Are done at my workplace45.727.421.042.333.516.547.224.723.0
With whom:
 Are done on my own72.920.26.871.620.18.273.520.36.2
 Are done with people of my own gender*71.019.19.961.327.810.875.315.29.4
 Are done with an exercise partner/buddy66.722.810.567.523.78.866.422.411.3
 Are done with people who have the same health condition as I do64.222.810.264.421.19.364.123.510.6
 Are done with people at my level of ability63.523.413.169.120.110.861.124.914.1
 Are done with people my age63.224.512.362.426.311.363.623.712.7
 Are done in a small group (e.g., 3–6 people)62.124.813.164.923.211.960.825.613.6
 Are team-based52.531.116.457.230.412.450.531.318.2

*Significant gender difference (p<0.05).

A=agree; N=neither agree nor disagree; D=disagree.

Activity type preferences are presented in Table 3. For the whole sample, the most commonly preferred types for recreational physical activity participation (>62%) were swimming and walking. Other common preferences among males were jogging, football and fitness/weights, and among females were cycling and aerobics. Having controlled for BMI and age, results showed that male students were more likely than females to prefer football (OR=6.7; 95% CI 4.4 to 10.1; p<0.00), fitness/weights (OR=2.9; 95% CI 2.0 to 4.2; p<0.00), jogging (OR=1.7; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.4; p=0.004), martial arts (OR=1.6; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.4; p=0.02) and table tennis (OR=3.8; 95% CI 2.2 to 6.5; p<0.00). Female students were significantly more likely to report a preference for aerobics (OR=3.6; 95% CI 2.4 to 5.6; p<0.00), cycling (OR=1.5; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.2; p=0.02), squash (OR=3.5; 95% CI 1.9 to 6.5; p<0.00), walking (OR=2.1; 95% CI 1.4 to 3.0; p<0.00) and yoga (OR=2.6; 95% CI 1.7 to 4.0; p<0.00). No significant gender differences were found for preferences for basketball, swimming, tennis or volleyball.

Table 3.

Preference for physical activity type, by gender

TypeTotalMaleFemale
(n=628)(n=194)(n=434)
Walking*66.7%56.0%71.4%
Swimming61.7%56.5%64.1%
Jogging*43.1%50.8%39.6%
Cycling*38.6%32.1%41.5%
Fitness/weights*33.3%49.7%26.0%
Aerobics*33.2%16.6%40.6%
Yoga*28.7%16.1%34.3%
Football*24.4%49.7%13.1%
Martial arts*23.8%29.5%21.2%
Basketball16.6%17.6%16.1%
Squash*16.6%6.7%21.0%
Volleyball15.9%17.6%15.2%
Table tennis*10.4%19.7%6.2%
Tennis8.6%10.9%7.6%
TypeTotalMaleFemale
(n=628)(n=194)(n=434)
Walking*66.7%56.0%71.4%
Swimming61.7%56.5%64.1%
Jogging*43.1%50.8%39.6%
Cycling*38.6%32.1%41.5%
Fitness/weights*33.3%49.7%26.0%
Aerobics*33.2%16.6%40.6%
Yoga*28.7%16.1%34.3%
Football*24.4%49.7%13.1%
Martial arts*23.8%29.5%21.2%
Basketball16.6%17.6%16.1%
Squash*16.6%6.7%21.0%
Volleyball15.9%17.6%15.2%
Table tennis*10.4%19.7%6.2%
Tennis8.6%10.9%7.6%

*Significant gender difference (p<0.05).

Table 3.

Preference for physical activity type, by gender

TypeTotalMaleFemale
(n=628)(n=194)(n=434)
Walking*66.7%56.0%71.4%
Swimming61.7%56.5%64.1%
Jogging*43.1%50.8%39.6%
Cycling*38.6%32.1%41.5%
Fitness/weights*33.3%49.7%26.0%
Aerobics*33.2%16.6%40.6%
Yoga*28.7%16.1%34.3%
Football*24.4%49.7%13.1%
Martial arts*23.8%29.5%21.2%
Basketball16.6%17.6%16.1%
Squash*16.6%6.7%21.0%
Volleyball15.9%17.6%15.2%
Table tennis*10.4%19.7%6.2%
Tennis8.6%10.9%7.6%
TypeTotalMaleFemale
(n=628)(n=194)(n=434)
Walking*66.7%56.0%71.4%
Swimming61.7%56.5%64.1%
Jogging*43.1%50.8%39.6%
Cycling*38.6%32.1%41.5%
Fitness/weights*33.3%49.7%26.0%
Aerobics*33.2%16.6%40.6%
Yoga*28.7%16.1%34.3%
Football*24.4%49.7%13.1%
Martial arts*23.8%29.5%21.2%
Basketball16.6%17.6%16.1%
Squash*16.6%6.7%21.0%
Volleyball15.9%17.6%15.2%
Table tennis*10.4%19.7%6.2%
Tennis8.6%10.9%7.6%

*Significant gender difference (p<0.05).

Discussion

Understanding the recreational physical activity type and context preferences of Emirati university students can assist in developing physical activity interventions for this group. In the current study, Emirati university students commonly reported a preference for activities that include a fun element, where the individual can choose the intensity, which can be done on one’s own, are done at a fixed time/scheduled and involve little or no cost. Walking and swimming were the most popular activity types. Male students also had a common preference for jogging, fitness/weights and football, as well as activities in the local neighbourhood or area and with a social aspect. Female students had a common preference for cycling, aerobics and jogging, as well as activities with people of the same gender. Significant gender differences were found for recreational physical activity contexts, with males preferring competition and females preferring same gender, supervision and activities done at home. Significant gender differences were also found for activity types, with males preferring football, fitness/weights, jogging, martial arts and table tennis and female students preferring aerobics, cycling, squash, walking and yoga.

Overall, the most preferred type of activity among these Emirati university students was walking. This is similar to previous research with both Australian university students19 and adult populations.24 This preference for walking is consistent with the current study’s results for preferred recreational physical activity contexts that can be done on one’s own, involve little or no cost, where the individual can choose the intensity and take place in the local neighbourhood. Walking may be appealing to university students as it does not involve fees or specialist equipment, and can be more easily incorporated into busy schedules (including study) than other activities that may be facility-, equipment- and teammate-dependent (e.g., tennis and table tennis).

The most preferred recreational physical activity contexts were those which had a fun element. Past research has noted that university can be a particularly stressful time26 and students may experience significant academic challenges. Given the stressful nature of academic life, university students may prefer fun activities as they are typically less evaluative and result-oriented. Many universities often, however, cater for competitive sports and gym-based activities. Investment in fun-based activities may assist in improving on-campus physical activity participation by university students. Activities done on one’s own at a fixed time/scheduled, involving little or no cost, with people of the same gender and where the individual can choose the intensity, may also be particularly appealing to Emirati university students.

For male Emirati university students, there was a common preference for activities in the local neighbourhood/area and with social elements. The majority of participants in this study lived in the family home and activities in the local neighbourhood may require significantly less travel, which may be appealing given the time constraints that many university students typically report.2729 The preference for social aspects is consistent with other research that highlighted the role of friends as one of the key enablers of physical activity participation for university students.30,31 It is unclear why these contexts were more salient for males than females and more research may be required to examine this. Males were also more likely to prefer competitive activities than females and this was consistent with the increased likelihood to prefer activity types such as football, martial arts and table tennis. Male students’ preferences for football and weightlifting are consistent with other research with university students in Australia.18,19

For female Emirati university students, there was a common preference for activities that are gender-specific. This is not surprising given the distinct socio-cultural factors regarding gender in Muslim countries like the UAE, and that the females in the current study attended a female-only campus. Females were more likely than males to prefer activities that are done at home. Past research with Arab females has noted that a lack of culturally appropriate places13,20 and lack of permission to attend gatherings20 were key barriers to physical activity participation. Home-based activities may, therefore, be more socio-culturally acceptable for females in this population. Females also commonly preferred activities with a fixed time/schedule and this may be related to time constraints related to domestic duties and family responsibilities32 and academic life.2729 Females were more likely than males to prefer activities that are supervised, which may explain their preference for aerobics and yoga, which are typically instructor-led. Other physical activity types preferred by females were walking, swimming, cycling and jogging. These results are consistent with other research studies reporting that female Australian university students prefer walking, aerobics and yoga.18,19

A higher proportion of students (both male and female) reported a preference for activities that are held in the neighbourhood or local area rather than on the university campus (71.3% vs 59.6%). Possible reasons for this may be that universities are not providing the preferred activity types, that university activities may not be scheduled at suitable times for students (e.g., outside of class times), that activities or facilities closer to home may be more desirable due to heavy academic and home schedules, or that students may wish to participate with friends who are not enrolled at the university. More research may be required to identify why the campus is a less preferred place to participate in physical activity. In the meantime, the university may still play an important role in creating awareness of the benefits of participation and promoting actual physical activity participation in Emirati university students. One potential strategy may be for the university to promote the physical activity types and contexts most preferred by students, e.g., campaigns to promote campus walking may be well received.

A strength of this study is that it used a stratified random sample, which improves representativeness of the student population at this university. Results may, however, be vulnerable to response bias, and may not be generalisable to other university students in the UAE. The PAC-A allowed for assessment of a broad range of physical activity contexts which had typically not been looked at previously. A limitation is that the respondents indicated preferences for activity types and contexts separately, which may lead to conflicting results. For example, females reported strong preferences for activities done at home and for activities supervised by a leader. However, it may also be that females prefer doing yoga at home and aerobics under the supervision of an instructor.

Conclusions

These results on activity context and type preferences can inform physical activity planning for university students in the UAE. Walking and swimming may be popular for both males and females. Physical activity opportunities should prioritise having fun, be low cost, and activities in the local neighbourhood may be more appealing than university-based activities. Social and competitive activities (e.g., football) may be more attractive to male than female students, and female students may be more interested in organised and supervised activities (e.g., yoga and aerobics classes). Future research could explore the uptake and maintenance of activity options among university students, based on preferred activity attributes.

Authors’ contributions: All authors contributed to the study conception, design of protocol, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of and review of the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements: None.

Funding: None.

Competing interests: None to declare.

Ethical approval: This study was cleared in accordance with the ethical review guidelines and processes of The University of Queensland (2017000527).

References

1

Warburton
DER
,
Bredin
SSD
.
Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews
.
Curr Opin Cardiol
2017
;
32
:
541
56
.

2

Penedo
FJ
,
Dahn
JR
.
Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity
.
Curr Opin Psychiatry
2005
;
18
:
189
93
.

3

Rebar
AL
,
Stanton
R
,
Geard
D
et al.
A meta-meta-analysis of the effect of physical activity on depression and anxiety in non-clinical adult populations
.
Health Psychol Rev
2015
;
9
:
366
78
.

4

Wald
A
,
Muennig
PA
,
O’Connell
KA
et al.
Associations between healthy lifestyle behaviors and academic performance in U.S. undergraduates: a secondary analysis of the American College Health Association’s National College Health Assessment II
.
Am J Health Promot
2014
;
28
:
298
305
.

5

Keating
XD
,
Castelli
D
,
Ayers
SF
.
Association of weekly strength exercise frequency and academic performance among students at a large university in the United States
.
J Strength Cond Res
2013
;
27
:
1988
93
.

6

Melnyk
B
,
Kelly
S
,
Jacobson
D
et al.
Improving physical activity, mental health outcomes, and academic retention in college students with Freshman 5 to thrive: COPE/Healthy lifestyles
.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract
2014
;
26
:
314
22
.

7

Keating
XD
,
Guan
J
,
Pinero
JC
et al.
A meta-analysis of college students’ physical activity behaviors
.
J Am Coll Health
2005
;
54
:
116
25
.

8

Dinger
MK
,
Brittain
DR
,
Hutchinson
SR
.
Associations between physical activity and health-related factors in a national sample of college students
.
J Am Coll Health
2014
;
62
:
67
74
.

9

Junger
J
,
Frömel
K
,
Bergier
J
et al.
Physical activity in students from the Visegrad countries by BMI status
.
Health Prob Civil
2018
;
12
:
41
8
.

10

Sallis
JFP
,
Bowles
HRP
,
Bauman
AMP
et al.
Neighborhood environments and physical activity among adults in 11 countries
.
Am J Prev Med
2009
;
36
:
484
90
.

11

Mabry
RM
,
Koohsari
MJ
,
Bull
F
et al.
A systematic review of physical activity and sedentary behaviour research in the oil-producing countries of the Arabian Peninsula
.
BMC Public Health
2016
;
16
:
1003
.

12

Al-Drees
A
,
Abdulghani
H
,
Irshad
M
et al.
Physical activity and academic achievement among the medical students: a cross-sectional study
.
Med Teach
2016
;
38
(suppl 1)
:
S66
72
.

13

Awadalla
NJ
,
Aboelyazed
AE
,
Hassanein
MA
et al.
Assessment of physical inactivity and perceived barriers to physical activity among health college students, south-western Saudi Arabia
.
East Mediterr Health J
2014
;
20
:
596
604
.

14

WHO
. Prevalence of obesity among adults. http://gamapserver.who.int/gho/interactive_charts/ncd/risk_factors/obesity/tablet/atlas.html [accessed 22 June 2017].

15

WHO
. Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2014
.

16

Thompson
CE
,
Wankel
LM
.
The effects of perceived activity choice upon frequency of exercise behavior
.
J Appl Soc Psychol
1980
;
10
:
436
43
.

17

Burke
SM
,
Carron
AV
,
Eys
MA
.
Physical activity context: preferences of university students
.
Psychol Sport Exerc
2006
;
7
:
1
13
.

18

Leslie
E
,
Owen
N
,
Sallis
JF
.
Inactive Australian college students’ preferred activities, sources of assistance, and motivators
.
Am J Health Prom
1999
;
13
:
197
9
.

19

Gregg
C
,
Strikwerda-Brown
J
,
Stone
G
.
Physical activity levels, sporting, recreational and cultural preferences of students and staff at a regional university campus
.
ACHPER Aust Healthy Lifestyles J
2002
;
49
(3–4)
:
39
43
.

20

Ali
HI
,
Baynouna
LM
,
Bernsen
RM
.
Barriers and facilitators of weight management: perspectives of Arab women at risk for type 2 diabetes
.
Health Soc Care Commun
2010
;
18
:
219
28
.

21

Burton
NW
,
Khan
A
,
Brown
WJ
.
How, where and with whom? Physical activity context preferences of three adult groups at risk of inactivity
.
Br J Sports Med
2012
;
46
:
1125
31
.

22

Sperber
AD
,
Devellis
RF
,
Boehlecke
B
.
Cross-cultural translation: methodology and validation
.
J Cross Cult Psychol
1994
;
25
:
501
24
.

23

Geisinger
KF
.
Cross-cultural normative assessment: translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments
.
Psychol Assess
1994
;
6
:
304
12
.

24

Booth
ML
,
Bauman
A
,
Owen
N
et al.
Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians
.
Prev Med
1997
;
26
:
131
7
.

25

WHO
. BMI Classification. http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html [accessed 25 June 2018].

26

Gall
TL
,
Evans
DR
,
Bellerose
S
.
Transition to first-year university: patterns of change in adjustment across life domains and time
.
J Soc Clin Psychol
2000
;
19
:
544
67
.

27

Gómez-López
M
,
Gallegos
AG
,
Extremera
AB
.
Perceived barriers by university students in the practice of physical activities
.
J Sports Sci Med
2010
;
9
:
374
81
.

28

Faulkner
GEJ
,
Kwan
MYW
.
Perceptions and barriers to physical activity during the transition to university
.
Am J Health Stud
2011
;
26
:
87
.

29

Lerner
J
,
Burns
C
,
Róiste
ÁD
.
Correlates of physical activity among college students
.
Recreational Sports Journal
2011
;
35
:
95
106
.

30

Daskapan
A
,
Tuzun
EH
,
Eker
L
.
Perceived barriers to physical activity in university students
.
J Sports Sci Med
2006
;
5
:
615
20
.

31

Deliens
T
,
Deforche
B
,
De Bourdeaudhuij
I
et al.
Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in university students: a qualitative study using focus group discussions
.
BMC Public Health
2015
;
15
:
201
.

32

Berger
G
,
Peerson
A
.
Giving young Emirati women a voice: participatory action research on physical activity
.
Health Place
2009
;
15
:
117
24
.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.