-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
CiteCitation
Sofia Santos Costa, Miguel Viveiros, Constança Pomba, Isabel Couto, Active antimicrobial efflux in Staphylococcus epidermidis: building up of resistance to fluoroquinolones and biocides in a major opportunistic pathogen, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Volume 73, Issue 2, February 2018, Pages 320–324, https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx400
Download citation file:
© 2019 Oxford University Press
Close -
Share
Abstract
To analyse the efflux-mediated response of Staphylococcus epidermidis to ethidium bromide (EtBr), a substrate of multidrug efflux pumps (EPs).
The susceptible reference strain S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 was exposed to a step-wise adaptation to EtBr. The resulting EtBr-adapted strains were characterized regarding their antibiotic and biocide susceptibility by MIC determination and evaluation of efflux activity by re-determination of MICs in the presence of known efflux inhibitors and real-time fluorometry. Mutations in the QRDR of grlA and gyrA were screened by sequencing. The expression levels of S. epidermidis homologues of the main Staphylococcus aureus EP genes were quantified by RT–qPCR.
Exposure to EtBr led to a gradual increase in resistance to antimicrobials, with the final EtBr-adapted strain, ATCC 12228_EtBr, displaying phenotypic resistance to fluoroquinolones and reduced susceptibility to several antiseptics and disinfectants, although no mutations were detected in the QRDR of the grlA/gyrA genes. A reduction in the MICs of fluoroquinolones and selected biocides promoted by efflux inhibitors suggested an efflux-mediated response to EtBr exposure. Detailed analysis of the EtBr-adapted strains detected a gradual increase in efflux activity. Gene expression assays revealed a temporal activation of S. epidermidis EPs, with an early response involving norA, SE2010 and SE1103 followed by a late response mediated by norA, which coincided with the occurrence of the mutation −1A→T in the norA promoter region.
This study demonstrated that S. epidermidis has the potential to develop a multiple resistance phenotype mediated by efflux when exposed to a non-antibiotic substrate of multidrug EPs.
Introduction
Despite its commensal nature, Staphylococcus epidermidis is an important nosocomial pathogen responsible for life-threatening infections associated with the use of medical devices and in immunocompromised individuals, whose management is hindered by frequent resistance to antimicrobials.1,2 However, in opposition to Staphylococcus aureus, our understanding of S. epidermidis antimicrobial resistance mechanisms, particularly efflux driven, is very limited. To date, almost 10 chromosomally encoded multidrug efflux pumps (EPs) have been characterized in S. aureus with 20 additional putative multidrug EPs.3–5 In S. epidermidis, only homologues of the S. aureus EPs NorA/B/C have been predicted so far.6 Several studies from our group and others have shown that, in S. aureus, efflux contributes to resistance to fluoroquinolones and other antibiotics as well as antiseptics and disinfectants, in addition to promoting the emergence of MDR phenotypes.7–12
A strategy to assess the role of native EPs is to characterize isogenic strains that differ in the expression of these pumps.13 In the present study, we detail the adaptation of an S. epidermidis susceptible strain to ethidium bromide (EtBr), a non-antibiotic substrate of several multidrug EPs. The resulting EtBr-adapted cultures showed increased efflux activity, correlated with higher levels of resistance to antimicrobials and EP genes overexpression, which ultimately led to phenotypic resistance to fluoroquinolones and reduced susceptibility to biocides.
Materials and methods
EtBr-adaptation process
The susceptible reference strain S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 was subjected to a step-wise EtBr-adaptation process. The strain was grown at 37 °C in tryptone soya broth (TSB, Oxoid, UK) supplemented with doubling increasing concentrations of EtBr, starting from 0.25 mg/L (half the MIC of EtBr) up to 32 mg/L. After 23 days of growth and eight passages (Figure S1, available as Supplementary data at JAC Online), a strain adapted to 32 mg/L EtBr was obtained and denominated ATCC 12228_EtBr.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
MICs of antibiotics and biocides (Sigma–Aldrich, USA) were determined, in triplicate, by the two-fold broth microdilution method and evaluated according to EUCAST recommendations.14
MIC determination in the presence of efflux inhibitors (EIs)
MICs were re-determined in the presence of thioridazine, chlorpromazine, reserpine and verapamil as described above, except for the addition of each EI at half or lower its MIC prior to the inoculum.12
Real-time fluorometry
EtBr efflux assays were performed following incubation of bacteria with 400 mg/L verapamil (half MIC) and the most suitable EtBr concentration to maximize intracellular EtBr loading (Figure 1).12,15 Efflux activity was characterized by the slope (m) and the relative index of efflux activity (RIE).12
Assessment of efflux activity by real-time fluorometric EtBr efflux assays (a), gene expression levels in EtBr-adapted strains of four putative S. epidermidis multidrug EPs and an mgrA homologue (b) and analysis of the norA promoter region (c). (a) Real-time fluorometric assays were conducted in the presence of 0.4% glucose. EtBr-loaded cells were obtained by incubation with 400 mg/L verapamil plus the following EtBr concentrations: 0.125 mg/L (ATCC 12228-P0 to P4); 0.25 mg/L (P5 and P6); and 0.5 mg/L (P7 and ATCC 12228_EtBr-P8). The data presented were normalized against the data obtained under conditions of no efflux (cells incubated without glucose in the presence of 400 mg/L verapamil). The slope (m) of the EtBr efflux curves was calculated by a linear regression of the values obtained in the first 2 min of the assay and it relates to the rate of EtBr efflux under each condition tested.12 The RIE values were calculated as described previously and allow the direct comparison of the EtBr efflux activity of each culture at each step of the exposure (P1 to P8) relative to ATCC 12228 prior to EtBr exposure (P0).12 (b) Gene expression levels for passages P2, P4, P6 and P8 (ATCC 12228_EtBr) were quantified by the comparative method in relation to strain ATCC 12228. The results are presented as the mean and standard deviation of at least three independent assays performed with total RNA from independent extractions. Overexpression was considered for values superior to 2 (cut-off value represented by the dashed line). (c) Nucleotide sequence of the norA promoter region of ATCC 12228, depicting the −35 and −10 consensus sequences, the putative site of transcription initiation (*) and the Shine–Dalgarno (SD) sequence. At position −1, strain ATCC 12228 presents an adenine, whereas strain ATCC 12228_EtBr displays a thymine (in bold).
Assessment of efflux activity by real-time fluorometric EtBr efflux assays (a), gene expression levels in EtBr-adapted strains of four putative S. epidermidis multidrug EPs and an mgrA homologue (b) and analysis of the norA promoter region (c). (a) Real-time fluorometric assays were conducted in the presence of 0.4% glucose. EtBr-loaded cells were obtained by incubation with 400 mg/L verapamil plus the following EtBr concentrations: 0.125 mg/L (ATCC 12228-P0 to P4); 0.25 mg/L (P5 and P6); and 0.5 mg/L (P7 and ATCC 12228_EtBr-P8). The data presented were normalized against the data obtained under conditions of no efflux (cells incubated without glucose in the presence of 400 mg/L verapamil). The slope (m) of the EtBr efflux curves was calculated by a linear regression of the values obtained in the first 2 min of the assay and it relates to the rate of EtBr efflux under each condition tested.12 The RIE values were calculated as described previously and allow the direct comparison of the EtBr efflux activity of each culture at each step of the exposure (P1 to P8) relative to ATCC 12228 prior to EtBr exposure (P0).12 (b) Gene expression levels for passages P2, P4, P6 and P8 (ATCC 12228_EtBr) were quantified by the comparative method in relation to strain ATCC 12228. The results are presented as the mean and standard deviation of at least three independent assays performed with total RNA from independent extractions. Overexpression was considered for values superior to 2 (cut-off value represented by the dashed line). (c) Nucleotide sequence of the norA promoter region of ATCC 12228, depicting the −35 and −10 consensus sequences, the putative site of transcription initiation (*) and the Shine–Dalgarno (SD) sequence. At position −1, strain ATCC 12228 presents an adenine, whereas strain ATCC 12228_EtBr displays a thymine (in bold).
Macrorestriction analysis
SmaI (New England Biolabs, USA) restriction fragments of chromosomal DNA were resolved by PFGE.16
Screening of mutations conferring fluoroquinolone resistance
The QRDR of grlA and gyrA and the promoter region of norA were amplified, sequenced (primers in Table S1) and analysed with MEGA v 6.0.
In silico search for S. epidermidis putative multidrug EPs
Homologues of S. aureus native multidrug EPs5 and additional putative EPs were identified using public databases and in silico freeware (see footnote to Table S3).
Gene expression analysis
Total RNAs were isolated by the Trizol method.12 RT–qPCR experiments were carried out with equivalent RNA quantities and the QuantiTect SYBR Green RT–PCR Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) (primers in Table S1). Relative gene expression of isogenic strains was assessed by the comparative threshold cycle (CT) method,17 comparing each mRNA with the parental ATCC 12228 strain. Genes gyrB and 16S rDNA were used as reference controls; negative and genomic DNA contamination controls were included.
Results and discussion
Our understanding of the contribution of native multidrug EPs to antimicrobial resistance in S. epidermidis is still limited. To explore the capacity of S. epidermidis to produce an efflux-mediated response towards toxic stimuli, we exposed the susceptible strain ATCC 12228 to EtBr in a step-wise manner, an approach previously applied to S. aureus.13 The occurrence of contaminations or major chromosomal rearrangements during this process were ruled out by SmaI-PFGE patterns, which remained unaltered (data not shown). MIC values of EtBr, fluoroquinolones and biocides increased gradually following the increase in EtBr concentration, with an onset at exposure to the EtBr MIC (0.5 mg/L, passage P2). Phenotypic resistance to ciprofloxacin (MIC >1 mg/L) was detected following exposure to 4 mg/L EtBr (passage P5) (Table 1). Strain ATCC 12228_EtBr displayed an EtBr MIC of 32 mg/L, 64-fold higher than the MIC for the parental ATCC 12228 strain. It also presented MIC increases of 2-fold to 16-fold to several biocides including cetrimide, benzalkonium chloride and cetylpyridinium chloride (Table 1). Most importantly, ATCC 12228_EtBr showed a final ciprofloxacin MIC of 4 mg/L, 16-fold higher than the MIC for the parental ATCC 12228 strain. An even higher increment (32-fold) was observed for the norfloxacin MIC. Mild MIC increases were also observed for aminoglycosides and for erythromycin (Table 1). The emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance was not related to mutations in the QRDR of grlA/gyrA genes, which remained unaltered.
MICs of EtBr, antibiotics and biocides for the isogenic strains obtained during each passage of the EtBr adaptation of the parental S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 strain
| Antimicrobial | MIC (mg/L) for each isogenic strain | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | |
| EtBr | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 |
| Antibiotics | |||||||||
| ciprofloxacin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| norfloxacin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 16 |
| oxacillin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| penicillin | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 |
| ampicillin | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 8 |
| vancomycin | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| gentamicin | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.125 |
| kanamycin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| erythromycin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 |
| tetracycline | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| chloramphenicol | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Biocides | |||||||||
| cetrimide | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| benzalkonium chloride | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| chlorhexidine digluconate | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| tetraphenylphosphonium bromide | 32 | 32 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 512 |
| dequalinium chloride | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| cetylpyridinium chloride | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Antimicrobial | MIC (mg/L) for each isogenic strain | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | |
| EtBr | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 |
| Antibiotics | |||||||||
| ciprofloxacin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| norfloxacin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 16 |
| oxacillin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| penicillin | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 |
| ampicillin | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 8 |
| vancomycin | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| gentamicin | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.125 |
| kanamycin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| erythromycin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 |
| tetracycline | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| chloramphenicol | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Biocides | |||||||||
| cetrimide | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| benzalkonium chloride | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| chlorhexidine digluconate | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| tetraphenylphosphonium bromide | 32 | 32 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 512 |
| dequalinium chloride | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| cetylpyridinium chloride | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
P0, parental S. epidermidis ATCC 12228; P1, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 0.25 mg/L EtBr; P2, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 0.5 mg/L EtBr; P3, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 1 mg/L EtBr; P4, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 2 mg/L EtBr; P5, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 4 mg/L EtBr; P6, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 8 mg/L EtBr; P7, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 16 mg/L EtBr; P8, S. epidermidis ATCC 12228_EtBr, grown in TSB + 32 mg/L EtBr.
Values in bold highlight ciprofloxacin MIC values categorized as phenotypic resistance as evaluated by the EUCAST recommendations.14
MICs of EtBr, antibiotics and biocides for the isogenic strains obtained during each passage of the EtBr adaptation of the parental S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 strain
| Antimicrobial | MIC (mg/L) for each isogenic strain | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | |
| EtBr | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 |
| Antibiotics | |||||||||
| ciprofloxacin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| norfloxacin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 16 |
| oxacillin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| penicillin | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 |
| ampicillin | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 8 |
| vancomycin | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| gentamicin | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.125 |
| kanamycin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| erythromycin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 |
| tetracycline | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| chloramphenicol | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Biocides | |||||||||
| cetrimide | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| benzalkonium chloride | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| chlorhexidine digluconate | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| tetraphenylphosphonium bromide | 32 | 32 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 512 |
| dequalinium chloride | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| cetylpyridinium chloride | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Antimicrobial | MIC (mg/L) for each isogenic strain | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | |
| EtBr | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 |
| Antibiotics | |||||||||
| ciprofloxacin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| norfloxacin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 16 |
| oxacillin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| penicillin | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 |
| ampicillin | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 8 |
| vancomycin | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| gentamicin | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.125 |
| kanamycin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| erythromycin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 |
| tetracycline | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| chloramphenicol | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Biocides | |||||||||
| cetrimide | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| benzalkonium chloride | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| chlorhexidine digluconate | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| tetraphenylphosphonium bromide | 32 | 32 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 512 |
| dequalinium chloride | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| cetylpyridinium chloride | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
P0, parental S. epidermidis ATCC 12228; P1, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 0.25 mg/L EtBr; P2, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 0.5 mg/L EtBr; P3, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 1 mg/L EtBr; P4, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 2 mg/L EtBr; P5, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 4 mg/L EtBr; P6, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 8 mg/L EtBr; P7, ATCC 12228 grown in TSB + 16 mg/L EtBr; P8, S. epidermidis ATCC 12228_EtBr, grown in TSB + 32 mg/L EtBr.
Values in bold highlight ciprofloxacin MIC values categorized as phenotypic resistance as evaluated by the EUCAST recommendations.14
To ascertain the mechanism underlying the resistance phenotype, we evaluated the efflux activity throughout the EtBr-adaptation process. MICs for ATCC 12228_EtBr of EtBr, fluoroquinolones and selected biocides were re-determined in the presence of EIs, considering an MIC reduction equal or higher than 4-fold as indicative of efflux inhibition (Table S2).10,12 All EIs were able to reduce, although in different degrees, the MICs of the antimicrobials tested. Particularly, they could revert the phenotype of ciprofloxacin resistance. These results suggest that the ATCC 12228 parental strain exhibits basal efflux activity and the increase in MICs observed was due to an augmented efflux activity. Fluorometric assays confirmed this hypothesis, evidencing that the efflux activity increased gradually (lower slope values, higher RIE values), following the increase in EtBr concentration, with isogenic strain ATCC 12228_EtBr displaying the highest efflux activity (m = −0.447, RIE = 0.810) (Figure 1a).
To establish which putative multidrug EP(s) were involved in this augmented efflux, we searched for homologues of S. aureus multidrug EPs and other putative multidrug transporters. Twenty-five putative transporters were identified in the genome of S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 strain and other fully sequenced strains, which included the already predicted homologues of NorA/B/C,6 as well as other putative members of all the major secondary transporter families (Table S3). Five genes were selected for expression assays; the homologues of norA (SE0466), norB/norC (SE0196 and SE2010), the gene SE1103, encoding a transporter from the Multidrug and Toxic Compound Extrusion (MATE) family (the transporter family of MepA) and SE0458, a homologue of the S. aureus regulator gene mgrA. Figure 1(b) presents the expression levels of these genes throughout the EtBr-adaptation process. Increasing expression levels were detected for all genes tested, except SE0196, up to passage P6 (8 mg/L EtBr), whereas in ATCC 12228_EtBr (P8, 32 mg/L EtBr), only the norA homologue was overexpressed. Sequencing of the norA promoter region revealed a −1A→T transversion in ATCC 12228_EtBr (Figure 1c), which occurred only at this last passage. These results suggest that the resistance phenotype observed in ATCC 12228_EtBr was mainly mediated by NorA efflux activity in a similar manner to the one observed following the EtBr adaptation of a susceptible S. aureus strain.13 Yet, the temporal response of S. epidermidis to the EtBr challenge revealed an early response with cells increasing the levels of expression of norA, SE2010 and SE1103 as the EtBr pressure rises. Increasing the EtBr selective pressure, a distinct late response emerged, with a mutation occurring in the norA promoter of ATCC 12228_EtBr and an overexpression of norA while the remaining EP genes resumed their initial basal expression levels (Figure 1b). A similar response has been observed in S. aureus exposed to constant concentrations of EtBr, ciprofloxacin or cetrimide; a first response involving the overexpression of several EP genes, followed by an overall decrease in expression levels and the overexpression of specific EP genes.12
In this work, we further characterized the expression analysis of secondary multidrug EPs other than norA, in one of the few reports associating S. epidermidis EPs to antimicrobial resistance. Previous studies have associated NorA to gatifloxacin resistance in an endophthalmitis isolate6 and to EtBr resistance.18 The latter recent study also linked mutations in the norA promoter or 5′ untranslated regions with gene overexpression.18 The −1A→T mutation we encountered adds to the already described mutations in the S. epidermidis norA promoter that could affect norA expression levels by altering the efficiency of norA transcription.
In summary, our study reveals that similarly to S. aureus,12S. epidermidis has the potential to develop a resistance phenotype mediated solely by efflux following exposure to a non-antibiotic substrate of multidrug EPs. Our results support the pivotal role of NorA on the response to antimicrobial challenge. Yet, they also add a temporal perspective on the activation of different EP genes by S. epidermidis; an early response with activation of several EP genes followed by a late response mediated by norA. Together, these studies show that both S. aureus and S. epidermidis respond to antimicrobial challenge by overexpressing available EPs, until a mutation occurs that stabilizes the expression of a specific EP or alters the compound target. The ability of S. epidermidis for such an efflux-mediated response highlights the need of a deeper understanding of the role of native EPs in the development of antimicrobial resistance by this pathogen.
Funding
This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) through funds to GHTM-UID/Multi/04413/2013 and project PTDC/BIA-MIC/121859/2010. S. S. C was supported by grant SFRH/BPD/97508/2013 from FCT, Portugal.
Transparency declarations
None to declare.
Supplementary data
Figure S1 and Tables S1 to S3 are available as Supplementary data at JAC Online.
References
- antibiotics
- phenotype
- staphylococcus aureus
- gene expression
- mutation
- electrophysiological studies
- anti-infective agents, local
- bromides
- disinfectants
- ethidium
- fluorometry
- fluoroquinolones
- genes
- promoter regions (genetics)
- staphylococcus epidermidis
- pathogenic organism
- antimicrobials
- biocides
- malnutrition-inflammation-cachexia syndrome

