Comparison of Neutral Detergent Fiber Analysis Methods for Feed Ingredients, Diets, and Feces of Pigs

Abstract

Background

An accurate determination of fiber concentrations in feeds and feces is critical for the measurement of fiber digestibility in pigs. The method of AOAC for determining amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber (aNDF; method 2002.04) has been widely used for pig diets. To overcome the complexity of AOAC procedure, the Ankom method is also available for determining aNDF. Although these 2 methods have been compared for ruminant diets and feces, the comparison of the methods for pig diets and feces has not been documented.

Objective

The objective was to compare aNDF values determined by the AOAC (aNDF_AOAC) and the Ankom methods (aNDF_Ankom) of ingredients, diets, and feces for pigs.

Method

A total of 255 test samples consisted of 26 feed ingredients, 39 diets, and 190 feces of pigs were analyzed for aNDF. To compare aNDF_AOAC and aNDF_Ankom, regression analyses were performed with the aNDF_Ankom minus the mean aNDF_Ankom as an independent variable and the aNDF_AOAC minus the aNDF_Ankom as a dependent variable.

Results

The aNDF_Ankom were greater than the aNDF_AOAC by 2.90 percentage unit (standard error = 0.63; P < 0.001) on average for ingredients and by 2.56 percentage unit (standard error = 0.34; P < 0.001) on average for diets. For feces, the aNDF_Ankom were greater than the aNDF_AOAC by 1.30 percentage unit (standard error = 0.32; P < 0.001) on average. The differences between the aNDF_Ankom and the aNDF_AOAC were not consistent across the data ranges represented by a linear bias (slope = –0.16; standard error = 0.04; P < 0.001) in feces.

Conclusions

Amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber concentrations determined by the Ankom method were greater than the AOAC method in pig feeds and feces.

Highlights

Despite convenience, the Ankom method yields greater aNDF values compared with the AOAC method.

Accepted manuscripts

Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.