-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Rebecca J Brown, Baris Akinci, Matheos Yosef, Helen Phillips, Shokoufeh Khalatbari, Ekaterina Sorkina, Ferruccio Santini, Corinne Vigouroux, Maiah Brush, Rasimcan Meral, Giovanni Ceccarini, Mujdat Zeybel, Flavia Prodam, Julia von Schnurbein, Gian P Sorice, Merve C Guler, Nivedita Patni, Seher Tanrikulu, Saif Alyaarubi, Basak S Ozgen, Maria C Foss-Freitas, Secil Ozisik, Benerice Segrestin, Busra Ozcan, Suleyman C Adiyaman, Gianluca Musolino, Hilal Sekizkardes, Carla Musso, Yael Lebenthal, Samim Ozen, Vinaya Simha, Ilgin Y Simsir, Anna Stears, Thomas Scherer, Alessandra Gambineri, Josivan G Lima, Robert Semple, Martin Wabitsch, David Araujo-Vilar, Robert A Hegele, Elif A Oral, Lipodystrophy Severity Score to Assess Disease Burden in Lipodystrophy, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2025;, dgaf103, https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf103
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Lipodystrophy syndromes are rare disorders characterized by deficient adipose tissue, leading to insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and organ system abnormalities.
Our goal was to develop a lipodystrophy severity score (LDS) to holistically capture the diverse manifestations of lipodystrophy into a numerical score to aid in prediction of clinical outcomes and/or treatment impact.
An 8-domain LDS was developed by 8 disease experts in consultation with patient organizations. The LDS was rated for feasibility and content validity by 28 additional clinicians and 9 patient representatives. LDS was compared to the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of severity for 20 putative patient profiles, each at 2 different time points, and by comparing change in LDS to global impression of change. For external validation, LDS was calculated in 2 cohorts of patients with lipodystrophy treated with metreleptin.
LDS domains include Diabetes/Insulin Resistance, Microvascular Complications of Diabetes, Lipids, Cardiovascular, Liver, Kidney, Reproductive, and Other. Each domain is assessed by 1 or more questions assessing both lifetime and recent complications of lipodystrophy. The LDS had high content validity and feasibility and high reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients (>0.95). Global and domain-specific LDS were strongly correlated with CGI, as were changes in scores across visits (R = 0.79-0.99, P < .001 for all). In generalized lipodystrophy, metreleptin significantly reduced LDS (from 46 to 26 at 12 months, P < .001). The reductions were smaller in partial lipodystrophy (from 65 to 61 at 12 months, P = .04).
The LDS can reflect the severity of diverse manifestations of lipodystrophy and monitor changes following interventions.