Abstract

Background

Schistosomiasis is a major global health problem caused by blood-dwelling parasitic worms, which is currently tackled primarily by mass administration of the drug praziquantel. Appropriate drug treatment strategies are informed by diagnostics that establish the prevalence and intensity of infection, which, in regions of low transmission, should be highly sensitive.

Methods

To identify sensitive new serological markers of Schistosoma mansoni infections, we have compiled a recombinant protein library of parasite cell-surface and secreted proteins expressed in mammalian cells.

Results

Together with a time series of sera samples from volunteers experimentally infected with a defined number of male parasites, we probed this protein library to identify several markers that can detect primary infections with as low as 10 parasites and as early as 5 weeks postinfection.

Conclusions

These new markers could be further explored as valuable tools to detect ongoing and previous S mansoni infections, including in endemic regions where transmission is low.

Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease affecting more than 200 million people in 52 countries and is one of the world’s major health problems causing 200 000 deaths per year. In 2015, the impact of the disease was estimated at 3.5 million disability-adjusted life years, putting a huge socioeconomic burden on many low- and middle-income countries [1]. In humans, schistosomiasis is caused by 5 species of platyhelminth parasites belonging to the genus Schistosoma. Their geographical distribution is restricted by the presence of species-specific freshwater snails that act as intermediate hosts, with Schistosoma mansoni having the most widespread distribution, encompassing both Africa and South America [2]. Infected snails shed cercariae, a free-swimming larva, which penetrates human skin to initiate infection. Parasite maturation within its host takes several weeks: cercarial heads first remodel their surface to form schistosomula [3], which migrate through the dermis for several days before entering the host bloodstream. Eventually, young adult male and female S mansoni worms pair up in the liver before moving to the mesenteric blood vessels, where each pair can release over 300 eggs per day from 5 weeks postinfection [4]. The symptoms of schistosomiasis are caused by progressive accumulation of eggs within host tissues, eliciting host-derived immune responses that can eventually lead to liver fibrosis, portal hypertension, and, if left untreated, death [5]. In the absence of a licenced vaccine, treatment relies on the use of a single drug, praziquantel.

The exact prevalence of schistosomiasis worldwide may be underestimated due to limitations of routine methods of detection [6]. Diagnosis of S mansoni infections and subsequent decisions on mass drug administration mainly rely on observing parasite eggs in patients’ stools with the Kato-Katz test. Although this method can detect current infections, it is not sensitive enough to diagnose low levels of infection present in low-endemicity areas or in recently treated populations [7]. In these instances, detection of parasite antigens such as the circulating cathodic antigen or circulating anodic antigen (CAA) in patients’ sera or urine by sensitive field-applicable or laboratory-based assays is highly useful [8–10]. In areas where elimination has been achieved, the detection of antiparasite serum antibodies could support epidemiological surveillance that informs of any risk of resurgence. Host antibody responses to S mansoni parasites is often measured against whole parasite extracts such as soluble egg antigens (SEA) or soluble worm antigen preparation (SWAP), which are not molecularly defined and can lead to cross-reactivity with other helminth species. Although a diagnostic test based on a recombinant protein could mitigate these problems, only very few have been used to test patient antibody responses to Schistosoma infections [11]. The development of new, more sensitive diagnostic tools would therefore help to improve the detection and early treatment of schistosomiasis.

Extracellular antigens released by or displayed at the surface of the parasite at the initial stage of infection [3] can be valuable early immunodiagnostic markers because they are directly exposed to the host humoral system. The identification of such antigens has been aided by the sequencing and annotation of the S mansoni genome [12], and several proteomics [13–20], transcriptomics, and in silico analyses [21–23] have identified genes expressed by the schistosomula and adult worm. Despite their value, extracellular proteins pose challenges for recombinant expression because they contain structurally important posttranslational modifications such as glycosylation and especially disulphide bonds required to produce informative antibody epitopes. To address this, we have previously developed protein expression approaches in mammalian cells to compile large panels of parasite recombinant ectodomains that retain their binding activity and immunogenicity [24], enabling the identification of host-parasite receptor-ligand interactions and humoral markers of protection against malaria [25].

To identify new markers for S mansoni infections, we created a panel of 115 recombinant proteins representing secreted and membrane-tethered S mansoni proteins mostly enriched at the schistosomula stage. Using human and mouse sera from experimentally controlled S mansoni infections, we determined the kinetics of humoral responses to this panel of antigens in the context of primary infections and identified several early serological markers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Identification of Schistosoma mansoni Cell-Surface and Secreted Proteins

Genes encoding cell-surface and secreted proteins from cercarial and adult S mansoni were identified using published proteomic and transcriptional data [13–16, 19–21]. To further enrich for genes transcribed at the schistosomula stage, we identified 1302 transcripts upregulated at 48 versus 3 hours posttransformation [26] using EdgeR [27] as well as the 1000 most abundant transcripts at 48 hours as assessed by reads per kilobase mapped, resulting in 1977 unique genes, 274 of which encoded secreted and cell-surface proteins identified using signal peptide and transmembrane domain prediction software [28, 29]. All RNA-seq data are available in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under study PRJEB3190 and run accession numbers ERR411525, ERR411535, and ERR411541 for the 3-hour time point and ERR411522, ERR411527, and ERR411538 for the 48-hour time point. Ninety-four mitochondrial, endoplasmic reticulum, or multipass proteins, which are difficult to express as a contiguous ectodomain, were subsequently excluded, leaving a short list of 180 proteins. Gene structures were manually refined by mapping transcriptome data to the genome sequence, and genes spanning gaps in the genome sequence or with ambiguity in structure were removed, resulting in a final list of 115 candidates numbered in Table 1.

Table 1.

Details of 115 Cell-Surface and Secreted Proteins From Schistosoma mansonia

NumberAccession No.NameBoundariesMMDomain/Protein SimilarityLevelRef.
Cell Surface
1Smp_195190Sm13E18-T8037High[17]
2Smp_081920SmLy6I (Cd59.5)L26-T10445Medium[17]
3Smp_166340SmLy6F (Cd59.4)L26-S9847Medium[17]
4Smp_017730Sm200D20-S1662257Medium[14]
5Smp_127820V18-S760132Medium[14]
6Smp_194920D17-T59298T-cell immunomodulatory proteinLow[14]
7Smp_011680L30-P34887Cd36-like class B scavenger receptorLow
8Smp_054070D31-S21071TM2 domain-containing protein 3High
9Smp_073400R25-T21478LAMP-like proteinMedium
10Smp_105220SmLyB (Cd59.2)I20-P9942High[15]
11Smp_019350SmLy6A (Cd59.1)H28-T10238High[15]
12Smp_021220E24-S11953High
13Smp_031880R18-S24058Ig domain-containing protein, basigin-relatedHigh
14Smp_009830D20-S14951Translocon-associated protein subunit betaLow
15Smp_032520Y19-R20074LAMP-like proteinHigh
16Smp_074000I19-I23256Low
17Smp_102480N29-D6637High
18Smp_124000MEG-14T27-D11038High
19Smp_156270S23-P14447Post-GPI attachment to protein factorLow
20Smp_174580S17-T27559Vesicular integral membrane proteinHigh
21Smp_176020MEG-11D23-P5534High
22Smp_048380L20-S28373Medium
23Smp_060570Y21-S42885Low
24Smp_075280V19-T22277LAMP-like proteinHigh
25Smp_129840G25-S1161206Medium
26Smp_133270E34-T759120Sel1-like protein-
27Smp_145420H30-I1733282Plexin A3-
28Smp_149740F26-T560130Alzheimer disease beta-amyloid relatedMedium
29Smp_155810L29-T1100184Protocadherin 11Medium
30Smp_162520N20-P1070162Protocadherin fat4Low
31Smp_164760S22-P1160184IgSFLow
32Smp_166300N27-I35694High
33Smp_168240Q25-T26368High
34Smp_171460L19-S841161IgSFMedium
35Smp_176540V31-T956146Protocadherin 18Medium
36Smp_157070I19-P39783EGF-domain-containing proteinLow
37Smp_165440Q25-P36374Netrin receptor unc5Low
38Smp_136690N26-T674118AcetylcholinesteraseMedium[17]
39Smp_061970F21-P51895GPI ethanolamine phosphate transferase 2-
40Smp_153390SmNNP5S19-S42895Medium[14]
41Smp_072190SmLy6D (Sm29)V27-T16857High[14]
42Smp_064430A22-S15553Medium[19]
Secreted Adhesion/Growth Factor/Metabolite Binding
43Smp_194840E18-I14647NPC-like cholesterol-binding proteinHigh[50]
44Smp_194910N22-I18051Saposin B domain-containing proteinMedium[20]
45Smp_063530E26-R19349ApoferritinMedium[50]
46Smp_141680I33-A659110Fasciclin domain-containing proteinHigh[14]
47Smp_043650Q23-L8137Prohormone npp-28Low
48Smp_170550N27-Y928164GranulinMedium
49Smp_035040N24-L24163IgSFLow
50Smp_052660I22-R48897Matabotropic glutamate receptor-
51Smp_128590K21-S26069Laminin gamma3Low
52Smp_135210I21-Q1584220EGF-domain-containing proteinLow
53Smp_136320H21-K15448GSK3beta-interacting proteinLow
54Smp_144130L26-V553118Septate junction proteinLow
55Smp_154760Q30-M2155298EGF-domain-containing proteinLow
56Smp_171780Q19-K26061SPARCHigh
57Smp_178740Q31-V53397Tesmin-related proteinLow
58Smp_180600S22-S29272IGF-binding proteinHigh
59Smp_181220N18-I17350C1q-binding proteinMedium
60Smp_211020L32-Y703122Discoidin domain-containing protein-
61Smp_016490E21-Q19453SaposinB domain-containing proteinMedium
62Smp_130100F20-I12845Saposin domain-containing proteinLow[20]
63Smp_105420I19-S19653Saposin domain-containing proteinHigh
64Smp_105450Y19-C12658Saposin domain-containing proteinMedium[50]
65Smp_202610V19-T13546Saposin domain-containing proteinMedium
Secreted Proteases
66Smp_090100E24-Q58298InvadolysinLow[16]
67Smp_067060H18-N34073Cathepsin B1, isotype2High[50]
68Smp_103610SmCB1 (Sm31)H18-N34073Cathepsin B1, isotype1Low[50]
69Smp_019030D21-L45591Cathepsin C/Dipeptylpeptidase 1Low[50]
70Smp_002600L17-G498111Lysosomal Pro X carboxypeptidaseMedium[50]
71Smp_071610I24-L47299Dipeptidyl-peptidase IIMedium[50]
72Smp_089670S19-N2127409Alpha-2 macroglobulinMedium[15]
73Smp_112090SmCE2a.3F19-I26356Cercarial elastase 2a-[16]
74Smp_119130SmCE1a.2W25-I26355Cercarial elastase 1a-[16]
75Smp_002150SmSP2S25-F50197Trypsin-like serine proteaseLow
76Smp_141610SmCB2N23-N34772Cathepsin BMedium
77Smp_147730SmKI-1Y21-K14647Kunitz-type protease inhibitorMedium
78Smp_034420Sm12.8N20-S14856CystatinMedium
79Smp_075800Q20-G42983HemoglobinaseLow
80Smp_210500SmCL3D17-V37075Cathepsin L3Medium
81Smp_132480E16-S39379Subfamily A1A unassigned peptidaseLow
82Smp_166280C20-L33779Glutaminyl cyclaseMedium
83Smp_187 140K21-F34274Cathepsin LLow
84Smp_006510SmCE2a.2W25-I26353Cercarial elastase 2a-[19]
85Smp_090110E24-I591103Invadolysin-[19]
Other Secreted Enzymes
86Smp_145920Y30-F34071Protein tyrosine sulfotransfereaseLow
87Smp_040790E24-E21354Peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase BMedium
88Smp_008320D18-D32572Pap-inositol-1,4-phosphataseLow
89Smp_021730G30-D22052Cytochrome c oxydase subunit VbLow
90Smp_078800E25-S19249DnaJ subfamily BLow
91Smp_007450R22-G16048Heat-shock 67b2Medium
92Smp_026930T51-V44285AcetylglucosaminyltransferaseMedium
93Smp_059910D28-Q27470Ser-Thr protein phosphatase-
94Smp_089240K43-Y49893Acetylglucosaminyltransferase-
95Smp_134800K20-T1590242Tyr protein kinaseLow
96Smp_018760N25-L991152Alpha glucosidaseLow[19]
Secreted VALs/MEGs
97Smp_194860Sm8.7E20-E9239Medium[17]
98Smp_138080MEG-3.1A21-S14650High[17]
99Smp_194830SmKK7K21-D7937High[16]
100Smp_001890VAL18K27-Y19455Low[16]
101Smp_002070VAL4K22-E18157Low[16]
102Smp_138060MEG-3.3A21-G15146High
103Smp_180620MEG-17N17-R6541High
104Smp_123540VAL12I22-L2457Low
105Smp_123550VAL8Q24-K26166Medium
Putative Secreted Proteins
106Smp_181070K25-Q11443Low
107Smp_004710M26-S12742High
108Smp_061310Y20-E14065Low
109Smp_005060E17-I14645-
110Smp_141500N27-L12156High
111Smp_006060P35-P38092High
112Smp_063330K24-F18248High
113Smp_096 790T21-E9438Medium
114Smp_201730E24-R9238Medium
115Smp_019000D28-D23653Medium[19]
NumberAccession No.NameBoundariesMMDomain/Protein SimilarityLevelRef.
Cell Surface
1Smp_195190Sm13E18-T8037High[17]
2Smp_081920SmLy6I (Cd59.5)L26-T10445Medium[17]
3Smp_166340SmLy6F (Cd59.4)L26-S9847Medium[17]
4Smp_017730Sm200D20-S1662257Medium[14]
5Smp_127820V18-S760132Medium[14]
6Smp_194920D17-T59298T-cell immunomodulatory proteinLow[14]
7Smp_011680L30-P34887Cd36-like class B scavenger receptorLow
8Smp_054070D31-S21071TM2 domain-containing protein 3High
9Smp_073400R25-T21478LAMP-like proteinMedium
10Smp_105220SmLyB (Cd59.2)I20-P9942High[15]
11Smp_019350SmLy6A (Cd59.1)H28-T10238High[15]
12Smp_021220E24-S11953High
13Smp_031880R18-S24058Ig domain-containing protein, basigin-relatedHigh
14Smp_009830D20-S14951Translocon-associated protein subunit betaLow
15Smp_032520Y19-R20074LAMP-like proteinHigh
16Smp_074000I19-I23256Low
17Smp_102480N29-D6637High
18Smp_124000MEG-14T27-D11038High
19Smp_156270S23-P14447Post-GPI attachment to protein factorLow
20Smp_174580S17-T27559Vesicular integral membrane proteinHigh
21Smp_176020MEG-11D23-P5534High
22Smp_048380L20-S28373Medium
23Smp_060570Y21-S42885Low
24Smp_075280V19-T22277LAMP-like proteinHigh
25Smp_129840G25-S1161206Medium
26Smp_133270E34-T759120Sel1-like protein-
27Smp_145420H30-I1733282Plexin A3-
28Smp_149740F26-T560130Alzheimer disease beta-amyloid relatedMedium
29Smp_155810L29-T1100184Protocadherin 11Medium
30Smp_162520N20-P1070162Protocadherin fat4Low
31Smp_164760S22-P1160184IgSFLow
32Smp_166300N27-I35694High
33Smp_168240Q25-T26368High
34Smp_171460L19-S841161IgSFMedium
35Smp_176540V31-T956146Protocadherin 18Medium
36Smp_157070I19-P39783EGF-domain-containing proteinLow
37Smp_165440Q25-P36374Netrin receptor unc5Low
38Smp_136690N26-T674118AcetylcholinesteraseMedium[17]
39Smp_061970F21-P51895GPI ethanolamine phosphate transferase 2-
40Smp_153390SmNNP5S19-S42895Medium[14]
41Smp_072190SmLy6D (Sm29)V27-T16857High[14]
42Smp_064430A22-S15553Medium[19]
Secreted Adhesion/Growth Factor/Metabolite Binding
43Smp_194840E18-I14647NPC-like cholesterol-binding proteinHigh[50]
44Smp_194910N22-I18051Saposin B domain-containing proteinMedium[20]
45Smp_063530E26-R19349ApoferritinMedium[50]
46Smp_141680I33-A659110Fasciclin domain-containing proteinHigh[14]
47Smp_043650Q23-L8137Prohormone npp-28Low
48Smp_170550N27-Y928164GranulinMedium
49Smp_035040N24-L24163IgSFLow
50Smp_052660I22-R48897Matabotropic glutamate receptor-
51Smp_128590K21-S26069Laminin gamma3Low
52Smp_135210I21-Q1584220EGF-domain-containing proteinLow
53Smp_136320H21-K15448GSK3beta-interacting proteinLow
54Smp_144130L26-V553118Septate junction proteinLow
55Smp_154760Q30-M2155298EGF-domain-containing proteinLow
56Smp_171780Q19-K26061SPARCHigh
57Smp_178740Q31-V53397Tesmin-related proteinLow
58Smp_180600S22-S29272IGF-binding proteinHigh
59Smp_181220N18-I17350C1q-binding proteinMedium
60Smp_211020L32-Y703122Discoidin domain-containing protein-
61Smp_016490E21-Q19453SaposinB domain-containing proteinMedium
62Smp_130100F20-I12845Saposin domain-containing proteinLow[20]
63Smp_105420I19-S19653Saposin domain-containing proteinHigh
64Smp_105450Y19-C12658Saposin domain-containing proteinMedium[50]
65Smp_202610V19-T13546Saposin domain-containing proteinMedium
Secreted Proteases
66Smp_090100E24-Q58298InvadolysinLow[16]
67Smp_067060H18-N34073Cathepsin B1, isotype2High[50]
68Smp_103610SmCB1 (Sm31)H18-N34073Cathepsin B1, isotype1Low[50]
69Smp_019030D21-L45591Cathepsin C/Dipeptylpeptidase 1Low[50]
70Smp_002600L17-G498111Lysosomal Pro X carboxypeptidaseMedium[50]
71Smp_071610I24-L47299Dipeptidyl-peptidase IIMedium[50]
72Smp_089670S19-N2127409Alpha-2 macroglobulinMedium[15]
73Smp_112090SmCE2a.3F19-I26356Cercarial elastase 2a-[16]
74Smp_119130SmCE1a.2W25-I26355Cercarial elastase 1a-[16]
75Smp_002150SmSP2S25-F50197Trypsin-like serine proteaseLow
76Smp_141610SmCB2N23-N34772Cathepsin BMedium
77Smp_147730SmKI-1Y21-K14647Kunitz-type protease inhibitorMedium
78Smp_034420Sm12.8N20-S14856CystatinMedium
79Smp_075800Q20-G42983HemoglobinaseLow
80Smp_210500SmCL3D17-V37075Cathepsin L3Medium
81Smp_132480E16-S39379Subfamily A1A unassigned peptidaseLow
82Smp_166280C20-L33779Glutaminyl cyclaseMedium
83Smp_187 140K21-F34274Cathepsin LLow
84Smp_006510SmCE2a.2W25-I26353Cercarial elastase 2a-[19]
85Smp_090110E24-I591103Invadolysin-[19]
Other Secreted Enzymes
86Smp_145920Y30-F34071Protein tyrosine sulfotransfereaseLow
87Smp_040790E24-E21354Peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase BMedium
88Smp_008320D18-D32572Pap-inositol-1,4-phosphataseLow
89Smp_021730G30-D22052Cytochrome c oxydase subunit VbLow
90Smp_078800E25-S19249DnaJ subfamily BLow
91Smp_007450R22-G16048Heat-shock 67b2Medium
92Smp_026930T51-V44285AcetylglucosaminyltransferaseMedium
93Smp_059910D28-Q27470Ser-Thr protein phosphatase-
94Smp_089240K43-Y49893Acetylglucosaminyltransferase-
95Smp_134800K20-T1590242Tyr protein kinaseLow
96Smp_018760N25-L991152Alpha glucosidaseLow[19]
Secreted VALs/MEGs
97Smp_194860Sm8.7E20-E9239Medium[17]
98Smp_138080MEG-3.1A21-S14650High[17]
99Smp_194830SmKK7K21-D7937High[16]
100Smp_001890VAL18K27-Y19455Low[16]
101Smp_002070VAL4K22-E18157Low[16]
102Smp_138060MEG-3.3A21-G15146High
103Smp_180620MEG-17N17-R6541High
104Smp_123540VAL12I22-L2457Low
105Smp_123550VAL8Q24-K26166Medium
Putative Secreted Proteins
106Smp_181070K25-Q11443Low
107Smp_004710M26-S12742High
108Smp_061310Y20-E14065Low
109Smp_005060E17-I14645-
110Smp_141500N27-L12156High
111Smp_006060P35-P38092High
112Smp_063330K24-F18248High
113Smp_096 790T21-E9438Medium
114Smp_201730E24-R9238Medium
115Smp_019000D28-D23653Medium[19]

Abbreviations: EGF, epidermal growth factor; GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; GSK3beta, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta; Ig, immunoglobulin; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; IgSF, Ig superfamily; LAMP, lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein; MEGs, micro-exon genes; MM, molecular mass; NPC, Niemann-Pick C; NPP, ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase; Ref., reference; SPARC, secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine; VAL, venom allergen-like.

aFor each protein, we show the accession number, alternative name, boundaries of the extracellular domain expressed in mammalian cells, expected MM in kilodaltons, domain similarities, and level of expression as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). References to previous proteomics studies where this protein was identified are provided where available. The expected MM of each protein was calculated by adding 3 kDa per predicted glycosylation site (the average mass of a N-linked glycan) to the expected mass of the protein. Levels of expression were determined from each ELISA profile as detailed under Material and Methods.

Table 1.

Details of 115 Cell-Surface and Secreted Proteins From Schistosoma mansonia

NumberAccession No.NameBoundariesMMDomain/Protein SimilarityLevelRef.
Cell Surface
1Smp_195190Sm13E18-T8037High[17]
2Smp_081920SmLy6I (Cd59.5)L26-T10445Medium[17]
3Smp_166340SmLy6F (Cd59.4)L26-S9847Medium[17]
4Smp_017730Sm200D20-S1662257Medium[14]
5Smp_127820V18-S760132Medium[14]
6Smp_194920D17-T59298T-cell immunomodulatory proteinLow[14]
7Smp_011680L30-P34887Cd36-like class B scavenger receptorLow
8Smp_054070D31-S21071TM2 domain-containing protein 3High
9Smp_073400R25-T21478LAMP-like proteinMedium
10Smp_105220SmLyB (Cd59.2)I20-P9942High[15]
11Smp_019350SmLy6A (Cd59.1)H28-T10238High[15]
12Smp_021220E24-S11953High
13Smp_031880R18-S24058Ig domain-containing protein, basigin-relatedHigh
14Smp_009830D20-S14951Translocon-associated protein subunit betaLow
15Smp_032520Y19-R20074LAMP-like proteinHigh
16Smp_074000I19-I23256Low
17Smp_102480N29-D6637High
18Smp_124000MEG-14T27-D11038High
19Smp_156270S23-P14447Post-GPI attachment to protein factorLow
20Smp_174580S17-T27559Vesicular integral membrane proteinHigh
21Smp_176020MEG-11D23-P5534High
22Smp_048380L20-S28373Medium
23Smp_060570Y21-S42885Low
24Smp_075280V19-T22277LAMP-like proteinHigh
25Smp_129840G25-S1161206Medium
26Smp_133270E34-T759120Sel1-like protein-
27Smp_145420H30-I1733282Plexin A3-
28Smp_149740F26-T560130Alzheimer disease beta-amyloid relatedMedium
29Smp_155810L29-T1100184Protocadherin 11Medium
30Smp_162520N20-P1070162Protocadherin fat4Low
31Smp_164760S22-P1160184IgSFLow
32Smp_166300N27-I35694High
33Smp_168240Q25-T26368High
34Smp_171460L19-S841161IgSFMedium
35Smp_176540V31-T956146Protocadherin 18Medium
36Smp_157070I19-P39783EGF-domain-containing proteinLow
37Smp_165440Q25-P36374Netrin receptor unc5Low
38Smp_136690N26-T674118AcetylcholinesteraseMedium[17]
39Smp_061970F21-P51895GPI ethanolamine phosphate transferase 2-
40Smp_153390SmNNP5S19-S42895Medium[14]
41Smp_072190SmLy6D (Sm29)V27-T16857High[14]
42Smp_064430A22-S15553Medium[19]
Secreted Adhesion/Growth Factor/Metabolite Binding
43Smp_194840E18-I14647NPC-like cholesterol-binding proteinHigh[50]
44Smp_194910N22-I18051Saposin B domain-containing proteinMedium[20]
45Smp_063530E26-R19349ApoferritinMedium[50]
46Smp_141680I33-A659110Fasciclin domain-containing proteinHigh[14]
47Smp_043650Q23-L8137Prohormone npp-28Low
48Smp_170550N27-Y928164GranulinMedium
49Smp_035040N24-L24163IgSFLow
50Smp_052660I22-R48897Matabotropic glutamate receptor-
51Smp_128590K21-S26069Laminin gamma3Low
52Smp_135210I21-Q1584220EGF-domain-containing proteinLow
53Smp_136320H21-K15448GSK3beta-interacting proteinLow
54Smp_144130L26-V553118Septate junction proteinLow
55Smp_154760Q30-M2155298EGF-domain-containing proteinLow
56Smp_171780Q19-K26061SPARCHigh
57Smp_178740Q31-V53397Tesmin-related proteinLow
58Smp_180600S22-S29272IGF-binding proteinHigh
59Smp_181220N18-I17350C1q-binding proteinMedium
60Smp_211020L32-Y703122Discoidin domain-containing protein-
61Smp_016490E21-Q19453SaposinB domain-containing proteinMedium
62Smp_130100F20-I12845Saposin domain-containing proteinLow[20]
63Smp_105420I19-S19653Saposin domain-containing proteinHigh
64Smp_105450Y19-C12658Saposin domain-containing proteinMedium[50]
65Smp_202610V19-T13546Saposin domain-containing proteinMedium
Secreted Proteases
66Smp_090100E24-Q58298InvadolysinLow[16]
67Smp_067060H18-N34073Cathepsin B1, isotype2High[50]
68Smp_103610SmCB1 (Sm31)H18-N34073Cathepsin B1, isotype1Low[50]
69Smp_019030D21-L45591Cathepsin C/Dipeptylpeptidase 1Low[50]
70Smp_002600L17-G498111Lysosomal Pro X carboxypeptidaseMedium[50]
71Smp_071610I24-L47299Dipeptidyl-peptidase IIMedium[50]
72Smp_089670S19-N2127409Alpha-2 macroglobulinMedium[15]
73Smp_112090SmCE2a.3F19-I26356Cercarial elastase 2a-[16]
74Smp_119130SmCE1a.2W25-I26355Cercarial elastase 1a-[16]
75Smp_002150SmSP2S25-F50197Trypsin-like serine proteaseLow
76Smp_141610SmCB2N23-N34772Cathepsin BMedium
77Smp_147730SmKI-1Y21-K14647Kunitz-type protease inhibitorMedium
78Smp_034420Sm12.8N20-S14856CystatinMedium
79Smp_075800Q20-G42983HemoglobinaseLow
80Smp_210500SmCL3D17-V37075Cathepsin L3Medium
81Smp_132480E16-S39379Subfamily A1A unassigned peptidaseLow
82Smp_166280C20-L33779Glutaminyl cyclaseMedium
83Smp_187 140K21-F34274Cathepsin LLow
84Smp_006510SmCE2a.2W25-I26353Cercarial elastase 2a-[19]
85Smp_090110E24-I591103Invadolysin-[19]
Other Secreted Enzymes
86Smp_145920Y30-F34071Protein tyrosine sulfotransfereaseLow
87Smp_040790E24-E21354Peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase BMedium
88Smp_008320D18-D32572Pap-inositol-1,4-phosphataseLow
89Smp_021730G30-D22052Cytochrome c oxydase subunit VbLow
90Smp_078800E25-S19249DnaJ subfamily BLow
91Smp_007450R22-G16048Heat-shock 67b2Medium
92Smp_026930T51-V44285AcetylglucosaminyltransferaseMedium
93Smp_059910D28-Q27470Ser-Thr protein phosphatase-
94Smp_089240K43-Y49893Acetylglucosaminyltransferase-
95Smp_134800K20-T1590242Tyr protein kinaseLow
96Smp_018760N25-L991152Alpha glucosidaseLow[19]
Secreted VALs/MEGs
97Smp_194860Sm8.7E20-E9239Medium[17]
98Smp_138080MEG-3.1A21-S14650High[17]
99Smp_194830SmKK7K21-D7937High[16]
100Smp_001890VAL18K27-Y19455Low[16]
101Smp_002070VAL4K22-E18157Low[16]
102Smp_138060MEG-3.3A21-G15146High
103Smp_180620MEG-17N17-R6541High
104Smp_123540VAL12I22-L2457Low
105Smp_123550VAL8Q24-K26166Medium
Putative Secreted Proteins
106Smp_181070K25-Q11443Low
107Smp_004710M26-S12742High
108Smp_061310Y20-E14065Low
109Smp_005060E17-I14645-
110Smp_141500N27-L12156High
111Smp_006060P35-P38092High
112Smp_063330K24-F18248High
113Smp_096 790T21-E9438Medium
114Smp_201730E24-R9238Medium
115Smp_019000D28-D23653Medium[19]
NumberAccession No.NameBoundariesMMDomain/Protein SimilarityLevelRef.
Cell Surface
1Smp_195190Sm13E18-T8037High[17]
2Smp_081920SmLy6I (Cd59.5)L26-T10445Medium[17]
3Smp_166340SmLy6F (Cd59.4)L26-S9847Medium[17]
4Smp_017730Sm200D20-S1662257Medium[14]
5Smp_127820V18-S760132Medium[14]
6Smp_194920D17-T59298T-cell immunomodulatory proteinLow[14]
7Smp_011680L30-P34887Cd36-like class B scavenger receptorLow
8Smp_054070D31-S21071TM2 domain-containing protein 3High
9Smp_073400R25-T21478LAMP-like proteinMedium
10Smp_105220SmLyB (Cd59.2)I20-P9942High[15]
11Smp_019350SmLy6A (Cd59.1)H28-T10238High[15]
12Smp_021220E24-S11953High
13Smp_031880R18-S24058Ig domain-containing protein, basigin-relatedHigh
14Smp_009830D20-S14951Translocon-associated protein subunit betaLow
15Smp_032520Y19-R20074LAMP-like proteinHigh
16Smp_074000I19-I23256Low
17Smp_102480N29-D6637High
18Smp_124000MEG-14T27-D11038High
19Smp_156270S23-P14447Post-GPI attachment to protein factorLow
20Smp_174580S17-T27559Vesicular integral membrane proteinHigh
21Smp_176020MEG-11D23-P5534High
22Smp_048380L20-S28373Medium
23Smp_060570Y21-S42885Low
24Smp_075280V19-T22277LAMP-like proteinHigh
25Smp_129840G25-S1161206Medium
26Smp_133270E34-T759120Sel1-like protein-
27Smp_145420H30-I1733282Plexin A3-
28Smp_149740F26-T560130Alzheimer disease beta-amyloid relatedMedium
29Smp_155810L29-T1100184Protocadherin 11Medium
30Smp_162520N20-P1070162Protocadherin fat4Low
31Smp_164760S22-P1160184IgSFLow
32Smp_166300N27-I35694High
33Smp_168240Q25-T26368High
34Smp_171460L19-S841161IgSFMedium
35Smp_176540V31-T956146Protocadherin 18Medium
36Smp_157070I19-P39783EGF-domain-containing proteinLow
37Smp_165440Q25-P36374Netrin receptor unc5Low
38Smp_136690N26-T674118AcetylcholinesteraseMedium[17]
39Smp_061970F21-P51895GPI ethanolamine phosphate transferase 2-
40Smp_153390SmNNP5S19-S42895Medium[14]
41Smp_072190SmLy6D (Sm29)V27-T16857High[14]
42Smp_064430A22-S15553Medium[19]
Secreted Adhesion/Growth Factor/Metabolite Binding
43Smp_194840E18-I14647NPC-like cholesterol-binding proteinHigh[50]
44Smp_194910N22-I18051Saposin B domain-containing proteinMedium[20]
45Smp_063530E26-R19349ApoferritinMedium[50]
46Smp_141680I33-A659110Fasciclin domain-containing proteinHigh[14]
47Smp_043650Q23-L8137Prohormone npp-28Low
48Smp_170550N27-Y928164GranulinMedium
49Smp_035040N24-L24163IgSFLow
50Smp_052660I22-R48897Matabotropic glutamate receptor-
51Smp_128590K21-S26069Laminin gamma3Low
52Smp_135210I21-Q1584220EGF-domain-containing proteinLow
53Smp_136320H21-K15448GSK3beta-interacting proteinLow
54Smp_144130L26-V553118Septate junction proteinLow
55Smp_154760Q30-M2155298EGF-domain-containing proteinLow
56Smp_171780Q19-K26061SPARCHigh
57Smp_178740Q31-V53397Tesmin-related proteinLow
58Smp_180600S22-S29272IGF-binding proteinHigh
59Smp_181220N18-I17350C1q-binding proteinMedium
60Smp_211020L32-Y703122Discoidin domain-containing protein-
61Smp_016490E21-Q19453SaposinB domain-containing proteinMedium
62Smp_130100F20-I12845Saposin domain-containing proteinLow[20]
63Smp_105420I19-S19653Saposin domain-containing proteinHigh
64Smp_105450Y19-C12658Saposin domain-containing proteinMedium[50]
65Smp_202610V19-T13546Saposin domain-containing proteinMedium
Secreted Proteases
66Smp_090100E24-Q58298InvadolysinLow[16]
67Smp_067060H18-N34073Cathepsin B1, isotype2High[50]
68Smp_103610SmCB1 (Sm31)H18-N34073Cathepsin B1, isotype1Low[50]
69Smp_019030D21-L45591Cathepsin C/Dipeptylpeptidase 1Low[50]
70Smp_002600L17-G498111Lysosomal Pro X carboxypeptidaseMedium[50]
71Smp_071610I24-L47299Dipeptidyl-peptidase IIMedium[50]
72Smp_089670S19-N2127409Alpha-2 macroglobulinMedium[15]
73Smp_112090SmCE2a.3F19-I26356Cercarial elastase 2a-[16]
74Smp_119130SmCE1a.2W25-I26355Cercarial elastase 1a-[16]
75Smp_002150SmSP2S25-F50197Trypsin-like serine proteaseLow
76Smp_141610SmCB2N23-N34772Cathepsin BMedium
77Smp_147730SmKI-1Y21-K14647Kunitz-type protease inhibitorMedium
78Smp_034420Sm12.8N20-S14856CystatinMedium
79Smp_075800Q20-G42983HemoglobinaseLow
80Smp_210500SmCL3D17-V37075Cathepsin L3Medium
81Smp_132480E16-S39379Subfamily A1A unassigned peptidaseLow
82Smp_166280C20-L33779Glutaminyl cyclaseMedium
83Smp_187 140K21-F34274Cathepsin LLow
84Smp_006510SmCE2a.2W25-I26353Cercarial elastase 2a-[19]
85Smp_090110E24-I591103Invadolysin-[19]
Other Secreted Enzymes
86Smp_145920Y30-F34071Protein tyrosine sulfotransfereaseLow
87Smp_040790E24-E21354Peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase BMedium
88Smp_008320D18-D32572Pap-inositol-1,4-phosphataseLow
89Smp_021730G30-D22052Cytochrome c oxydase subunit VbLow
90Smp_078800E25-S19249DnaJ subfamily BLow
91Smp_007450R22-G16048Heat-shock 67b2Medium
92Smp_026930T51-V44285AcetylglucosaminyltransferaseMedium
93Smp_059910D28-Q27470Ser-Thr protein phosphatase-
94Smp_089240K43-Y49893Acetylglucosaminyltransferase-
95Smp_134800K20-T1590242Tyr protein kinaseLow
96Smp_018760N25-L991152Alpha glucosidaseLow[19]
Secreted VALs/MEGs
97Smp_194860Sm8.7E20-E9239Medium[17]
98Smp_138080MEG-3.1A21-S14650High[17]
99Smp_194830SmKK7K21-D7937High[16]
100Smp_001890VAL18K27-Y19455Low[16]
101Smp_002070VAL4K22-E18157Low[16]
102Smp_138060MEG-3.3A21-G15146High
103Smp_180620MEG-17N17-R6541High
104Smp_123540VAL12I22-L2457Low
105Smp_123550VAL8Q24-K26166Medium
Putative Secreted Proteins
106Smp_181070K25-Q11443Low
107Smp_004710M26-S12742High
108Smp_061310Y20-E14065Low
109Smp_005060E17-I14645-
110Smp_141500N27-L12156High
111Smp_006060P35-P38092High
112Smp_063330K24-F18248High
113Smp_096 790T21-E9438Medium
114Smp_201730E24-R9238Medium
115Smp_019000D28-D23653Medium[19]

Abbreviations: EGF, epidermal growth factor; GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; GSK3beta, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta; Ig, immunoglobulin; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; IgSF, Ig superfamily; LAMP, lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein; MEGs, micro-exon genes; MM, molecular mass; NPC, Niemann-Pick C; NPP, ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase; Ref., reference; SPARC, secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine; VAL, venom allergen-like.

aFor each protein, we show the accession number, alternative name, boundaries of the extracellular domain expressed in mammalian cells, expected MM in kilodaltons, domain similarities, and level of expression as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). References to previous proteomics studies where this protein was identified are provided where available. The expected MM of each protein was calculated by adding 3 kDa per predicted glycosylation site (the average mass of a N-linked glycan) to the expected mass of the protein. Levels of expression were determined from each ELISA profile as detailed under Material and Methods.

Recombinant Protein Expression Using a Mammalian Expression System

The entire ectodomain of membrane-anchored proteins was selected, their signal peptide removed using predictions from SignalP v3.0, and the corresponding cDNAs were made by gene synthesis after codon-optimization for expression in human cells (GeneArt; Invitrogen). The ectodomains were flanked by unique NotI and AscI restriction sites and subcloned into an expression plasmid containing the mouse VK7–33 signal peptide [24], and a C-terminal tag containing rat Cd4d3 + 4 domain, a BirA monobiotinylation sequence, and 6-His tag (Addgene plasmid no. 50 803) [30]. All expression constructs are available at www.addgene.org (plasmids nos. 120 590 to 120 704). Plasmids were transiently cotransfected with BirA in HEK293-E or -6E cells, supernatants were collected, and recombinant proteins were detected by Western blotting with 0.02 µg/mL streptavidin-HRP (Jackson ImmunoResearch) as previously described [24]. When proteins showed signs of proteolytic cleavages, transfections were repeated in the presence of a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma).

Human Samples From Endemic Regions and Experimentally Controlled Infections

To initially characterize the immunoreactivity of the proteins, we used plasma pools from 10 nonexposed European controls and 10 Ugandan adults from a cohort living in a high transmission area [31, 32]. Individuals were selected from those who had a soluble worm antigen immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 response in the upper third for the cohort with a median egg count of 876 eggs per gram (epg) (interquartile range, 345–1967 epg). All patient samples were collected in accordance with the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology and the Cambridge Local Research Ethics Committee. Sera or plasma from volunteers experimentally infected percutaneously with 10–30 male cercariae were collected weekly in accordance with the LUMC Institutional Medical Ethical Research Committee (P16.111), as previously described [33]. All volunteers were treated with praziquantel 12 weeks after infection.

Sera From Experimental Mouse Infections

The life cycle of the NMRI (Puerto Rican) strain of S mansoni was maintained by routine infections of mice and susceptible Biomphalaria glabrata snails under the UK Home Office Project Licence nos. P77E8A062 and PD3DA8D1F; all protocols were approved by the local Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (AWERB). Seven-week-old BALB/c female mice were infected percutaneously by tail immersion in water containing 200 cercariae for 40 minutes under general anaesthesia or by injection of 350 cercariae intraperitoneally. Blood samples were collected at 8, 21, and 42 days postinfection.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays

Protein expression was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as previously described [24]. Briefly, serial dilutions of biotinylated proteins were captured on streptavidin-coated microtitre plates and detected by mouse antirat Cd4 OX68 antibody (AbD Serotec), followed by an alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated antimouse secondary antibody (Sigma), and proteins were classified into high (typically >5 µg/mL transfection supernatant), medium (between 1 and 5 µg/mL), and low (<1 µg/mL) levels of expression. To determine the presence of heat-labile epitopes, biotinylated proteins were captured on streptavidin-coated plates either untreated or after heat treatment for 10 minutes at 80°C before incubation with sera at 1:1000 dilution in HBST/2% bovine serum albumin (HBST/2%BSA). Statistical analysis was performed in GraphPad Prism using the Holm-Sidak method for multiple t tests. Sera from human volunteers or experimentally infected mice were diluted 1:250 or 1:1000, respectively, in HBST/2%BSA; binding was detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antihuman or antimouse secondary antibodies (Sigma), respectively, recognizing IgA, IgM, and IgG. For each individual, the optical density (OD) value of the preinfection samples was reference-subtracted from the OD readings at all subsequent time points. The OD values for each protein were compared with that of the rat Cd4d3 + 4 tag used as a negative control, and seropositivity was defined as ODprotein > ODcontrol + 3SDcontrol.

RESULTS

Selection and Expression of a Panel of 115 Secreted and Cell-Surface Proteins From Schistosoma mansoni

To compile a library of recombinant S mansoni proteins, we used published proteomics data to identify 40 proteins predicted to be located on the surface or secreted by the parasite (Table 1). Because membrane and secreted proteins of the schistosomula stage were underrepresented in proteomics datasets, we supplemented our library using transcriptomics data. To identify genes transcribed early after infection, we selected 1302 transcripts enriched at 48 versus 3 hours postinfection and the 1000 most abundant transcripts in the 48-hour schistosomula. Proteins likely to be secreted or membrane-anchored were identified, resulting in a list of 274 genes. Of those, mitochondrial, endoplasmic reticulum proteins, and those with incomplete open reading frames were excluded so that 75 new candidates were added for a total of 115 genes (Table 1). One third encoded single-pass transmembrane or GPI-anchored proteins, and the remaining secreted proteins were divided into 5 broad categories (Table 1). Proteins were expressed in HEK293 cells, quantified by ELISA, and their integrity was determined by Western blotting (Table 1, Figure 1). Most proteins were detected at their expected size including the very large proteins Sm200 (257 kDa, protein 4) and α 2-macroglobulin (409 kDa, protein 72) (Figure 1), and only 12 (10%) could not be detected (Table 1, Figure 1). This library of recombinant S mansoni surface and secreted proteins represents a valuable resource for immunological and functional studies.

A library of 115 recombinant cell-surface and secreted proteins from Schistosoma mansoni expressed as secreted enzymatically monobiotinylated recombinant proteins in HEK293 cells. Supernatants were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under reducing conditions, blotted, and detected with streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase. Approximately one third of the protein library consists of membrane-tethered surface proteins, whereas the remainder of the library corresponds to secreted proteins as indicated. Their predicted molecular mass is indicated by a red line. Three proteins (52, 57, 86) migrated faster than expected; 6 proteins (42, 68, 80, 89, 91, 102) exhibited evidence of partial processing; 13 proteins were not detected by Western blotting.
Figure 1.

A library of 115 recombinant cell-surface and secreted proteins from Schistosoma mansoni expressed as secreted enzymatically monobiotinylated recombinant proteins in HEK293 cells. Supernatants were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under reducing conditions, blotted, and detected with streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase. Approximately one third of the protein library consists of membrane-tethered surface proteins, whereas the remainder of the library corresponds to secreted proteins as indicated. Their predicted molecular mass is indicated by a red line. Three proteins (52, 57, 86) migrated faster than expected; 6 proteins (42, 68, 80, 89, 91, 102) exhibited evidence of partial processing; 13 proteins were not detected by Western blotting.

Schistosoma mansoni Recombinant Proteins Expressed in Mammalian Cells Contain Heat-Labile Conformational Epitopes

Many antibodies elicited in the context of a natural infection recognize conformational epitopes present on the native protein. To determine the fraction of proteins containing conformational epitopes, we compared the immunoreactivity of pooled plasma from chronically exposed individuals to untreated and heat-treated proteins. All except proteins 18 and 57 were seropositive, and 66 of the expressed proteins (64%) were highly immunoreactive (A280 > 0.3) (Figure 2). The majority of proteins showed moderate to strong loss of immunoreactivity after heat treatment; only 16 of the highly reactive proteins showed no statistically significant loss of reactivity, suggesting that they were either natively unstructured, misfolded, or contained heat-stable domains (Figure 2). Overall, the recombinant proteins were therefore immunoreactive to plasma from individuals living in high-endemicity areas and contained heat-labile epitopes.

The majority of recombinant proteins are immunoreactive to sera from individuals living in schistosomiasis-endemic areas and contain heat-labile conformational epitopes. Recombinant proteins were probed with pooled sera from individuals living in schistosomiasis-endemic areas (“infected,” red checked bars) or individuals from the United Kingdom who have never been infected (“control,” green dotted bars). To test for the presence of heat-labile epitopes, recombinant proteins were also heat-treated (80°C, 10 minutes) before being exposed to immune sera (“infected heat treated,” orange hatched bars). All except 2 proteins (18 and 57, shown in blue) were seropositive, as determined by Aprotein > Acontrol + 3SDcontrol ( = 0.201) (red dashed line), where control is the rat Cd4d3 + 4 protein tag. High immunoreactivity was determined as Aprotein > 0.3 (green dotted line). Proteins that exhibited little or no loss of reactivity after heat treatment are shown in italics, including 16 highly reactive proteins (6, 7, 14, 16, 19, 30, 32, 34, 36, 42, 49, 54, 56, 89, 101, 105). All measurements were performed in triplicate; error bars = standard deviation.
Figure 2.

The majority of recombinant proteins are immunoreactive to sera from individuals living in schistosomiasis-endemic areas and contain heat-labile conformational epitopes. Recombinant proteins were probed with pooled sera from individuals living in schistosomiasis-endemic areas (“infected,” red checked bars) or individuals from the United Kingdom who have never been infected (“control,” green dotted bars). To test for the presence of heat-labile epitopes, recombinant proteins were also heat-treated (80°C, 10 minutes) before being exposed to immune sera (“infected heat treated,” orange hatched bars). All except 2 proteins (18 and 57, shown in blue) were seropositive, as determined by Aprotein > Acontrol + 3SDcontrol ( = 0.201) (red dashed line), where control is the rat Cd4d3 + 4 protein tag. High immunoreactivity was determined as Aprotein > 0.3 (green dotted line). Proteins that exhibited little or no loss of reactivity after heat treatment are shown in italics, including 16 highly reactive proteins (6, 7, 14, 16, 19, 30, 32, 34, 36, 42, 49, 54, 56, 89, 101, 105). All measurements were performed in triplicate; error bars = standard deviation.

Serological Profiles of Human Experimental Schistosoma mansoni Infections

The recent establishment of controlled human S mansoni infections [33, 34] provided a unique opportunity to identify early serological markers of infection and the kinetics of the host antibody response in an experimentally controlled setting. We initially tested plasma taken at 4 weekly intervals from 3 volunteers, each infected with 30 male cercariae, against our 103 expressed S mansoni proteins. As expected, compared with high-endemicity plasma, fewer antigens were immunoreactive, but several were immunopositive in all participants, and the number of positive antigens increased over time (Figure 3). Five antigens (44, 63, 65, 67, and 68) showed consistently strong responses in all volunteers from 8 weeks postinfection. At 12 weeks, 4 additional antigens (61, 62, 83, and 106), which were already positive in 2 of 3 individuals at 8 weeks, were detected in all participants (Figure 3). It is remarkable that 5 of the 9 antigens seropositive by week 12 contained a saposin domain (proteins 44, 61, 62, 63, and 65), whereas proteins 67, 68, and 83 all belong to the cathepsin family of proteases. The number of antigens seropositive in all individuals increased over time up to week 20, so, in total, 20 antigens were immunoreactive in all volunteers for at least 1 time point, whereas another 17 were observed in at least 2 participants.

Identification of early markers of infection in human volunteers experimentally infected with Schistosoma mansoni male cercariae. Three individuals were each infected with 30 male cercariae, and their antibody response to 103 Schistosoma antigens were monitored every 4 weeks over a period of 20 weeks. The number of positive antigens increased over time with the most highly immunoreactive antigens containing saposin domains (proteins 44, 61, 62, 63, and 65) or belonging to the cathepsin family of proteases (proteins 67, 68, and 83). Colored symbols represent time point readings for each individual. Data points represent mean ± standard deviation; n = 3.
Figure 3.

Identification of early markers of infection in human volunteers experimentally infected with Schistosoma mansoni male cercariae. Three individuals were each infected with 30 male cercariae, and their antibody response to 103 Schistosoma antigens were monitored every 4 weeks over a period of 20 weeks. The number of positive antigens increased over time with the most highly immunoreactive antigens containing saposin domains (proteins 44, 61, 62, 63, and 65) or belonging to the cathepsin family of proteases (proteins 67, 68, and 83). Colored symbols represent time point readings for each individual. Data points represent mean ± standard deviation; n = 3.

Early diagnosis of infection before the onset of symptoms would be very valuable; therefore, we analyzed weekly samples from all 3 individuals until week 8 against the 9 antigens positive in all volunteers at the 12-week time point (Figure 4). Immunoreactivity was observed in all volunteers as early as 5 weeks postinfection for proteins 44 and 65, 6 weeks for protein 68, and 7 weeks for proteins 63 and 67. As observed previously, only 2 of the 3 participants were reactive to proteins 61, 62, 83, and 106 between 5 and 8 weeks postinfection. In the case of antigens 44, 65, 68, and 106, seropositivity increased sharply between weeks 4 and 6 before plateauing at later time points.

Kinetics of human antibody response to early markers of infection using sera from experimental infections by Schistosoma mansoni. Immunoreactivity to S mansoni antigens were quantified on a weekly basis in 3 individuals infected with 30 male cercariae. Reactivity to proteins 44 and 65 could be detected in all volunteers as early as 5 weeks postinfection. The control antigen corresponds to the rat Cd4d3 + 4 protein tag. Data points represent mean ± standard deviation; n = 3.
Figure 4.

Kinetics of human antibody response to early markers of infection using sera from experimental infections by Schistosoma mansoni. Immunoreactivity to S mansoni antigens were quantified on a weekly basis in 3 individuals infected with 30 male cercariae. Reactivity to proteins 44 and 65 could be detected in all volunteers as early as 5 weeks postinfection. The control antigen corresponds to the rat Cd4d3 + 4 protein tag. Data points represent mean ± standard deviation; n = 3.

To further determine the sensitivity of detection, we quantified the immunoreactivity in 3 volunteers exposed to only 10 cercariae (Figure 5). At 4 weeks, only 1 individual (participant E) was weakly seropositive for protein 44. All 3 volunteers were seropositive for proteins 44 and 65 at 8 weeks and reacted to all other antigens, except protein 83 by 12 weeks. Although immunoreactivity was lower than with the 30-cercariae dose and interindividual variability was present, proteins 44 and 65 were again the most immunogenic antigens. In conclusion, individuals experimentally infected with small numbers of S mansoni cercariae showed seropositivity to 5 antigens as early as 5 to 7 weeks postinfection.

Early reactivity to Schistosoma mansoni antigens is detectable in individuals challenged with just 10 cercariae. The immune response from 3 human volunteers infected with 10 male S mansoni cercariae was monitored at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postinfection. Reactivity to antigens 44 and 65 was detected in all participants at 8 weeks and as early as 4 weeks in the case of participant E and antigen 44. With the exception of protein 83, all volunteers were immunoreactive for the antigens tested at 12 weeks postinfection. Data points represent mean ± standard deviation; n = 3.
Figure 5.

Early reactivity to Schistosoma mansoni antigens is detectable in individuals challenged with just 10 cercariae. The immune response from 3 human volunteers infected with 10 male S mansoni cercariae was monitored at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postinfection. Reactivity to antigens 44 and 65 was detected in all participants at 8 weeks and as early as 4 weeks in the case of participant E and antigen 44. With the exception of protein 83, all volunteers were immunoreactive for the antigens tested at 12 weeks postinfection. Data points represent mean ± standard deviation; n = 3.

The Humoral Response Elicited by Mixed-Sex Infections in Mice Is Broadly Similar to That of Humans

Although sera from experimental infections with male carcariae identified valuable diagnostic antigens, any female-restricted antigens would not have been identified. To address this in a controlled experimental setting, we used mice as an animal model of infection. Sera were collected from mice infected either percutaneously with 200 cercariae or through intraperitoneal injection of 350 cercariae, and their serological responses were quantified (Figure 6). None of the antigens showed consistent reactivity across samples at 8 days postinfection, as expected; however, reactivity to antigen 44, and to a lesser extent, antigen 3, could be detected across all samples from day 21. At 42 days, an additional 8 antigens showed reactivity across all sera tested. Overall, reactivity with the pool of sera from mice infected intraperitoneally was stronger than individual mice infected percutaneously, possibly due to the higher number of cercariae used. Just like in human samples, proteins 44, 62, 63, 67, 68, and 106 were the most immunoreactive. In addition, reactivity to the Ly6 family members Ly6F, Ly6B, and Ly6D (proteins 3, 10, and 41, respectively) was detected at an earlier time point in mice than it was in humans. It is interesting to note that proteins 61 and 65, which were positive between 5 and 6 weeks postinfection in humans, did not react with murine samples, whereas conversely protein 71 generated a stronger response in mice.

Analysis of the acquired antibody response to Schistosoma mansoni antigens in experimentally infected mice. Individual sera from 3 mice infected percutaneously (PC) or pooled sera from 3 mice infected intraperitoneally (IP) were analyzed at 8, 21, and 42 days postinfection. The aim was to try and capture the antibody reactivity at different stages of parasite maturation: schistosomule at 8 days, immature adult at 21 days, and mature adult at 42 days. Proteins 44 and 3 were immunopositive at day 21, and 8 additional proteins (10, 41, 62, 63, 64, 67, 68, 106) were immunopositive at day 42. Each data point represents the average of triplicate experiments; error bars = standard deviation.
Figure 6.

Analysis of the acquired antibody response to Schistosoma mansoni antigens in experimentally infected mice. Individual sera from 3 mice infected percutaneously (PC) or pooled sera from 3 mice infected intraperitoneally (IP) were analyzed at 8, 21, and 42 days postinfection. The aim was to try and capture the antibody reactivity at different stages of parasite maturation: schistosomule at 8 days, immature adult at 21 days, and mature adult at 42 days. Proteins 44 and 3 were immunopositive at day 21, and 8 additional proteins (10, 41, 62, 63, 64, 67, 68, 106) were immunopositive at day 42. Each data point represents the average of triplicate experiments; error bars = standard deviation.

DISCUSSION

Despite its widespread distribution and high morbidity rate, schistosomiasis remains a neglected tropical disease whose true incidence and health impact remains underestimated [6]. In this study, we have described a recombinant protein library containing secreted and cell-surface proteins from different developmental stages of S mansoni, and together with sera obtained from a recently established controlled human infection model [33] we used it to determine the kinetics of the humoral response to S mansoni infection. Although other large arrays of parasite proteins have been used for diagnostic and immuno-epidemiological purposes, they have mostly relied on cell-free or bacterial expression systems [35, 36]. Mammalian expression systems are more suitable for the addition of structurally important posttranslational modifications found on extracellular proteins and thereby preserve conformational epitopes that can be recognized by antibodies. Using this approach, we successfully expressed 103 proteins, the majority of which were observed at their expected size. Although the 12 proteins we could not express were equally distributed among the different protein families represented in the library, 3 of them corresponded to elastases. Using pooled plasma from patients living in a high-transmission region of Uganda, we observed that 64% of the expressed proteins were strongly immunoreactive (A280 > 0.3) with the majority (82%) showing sensitivity to heat treatment, an indicator of tertiary folding. Although the lower immunoreactivity for 37 proteins may suggest incorrect folding, they could also be weakly immunogenic in humans or not directly exposed to the host immune system. Of the 16 most immunoreactive proteins observed, 11 had already been identified in the surface and secreted proteome of S mansoni; by contrast, only 6 of the 37 proteins with low serum reactivity (16%) have already been described in proteomics studies. The use of a single mammalian expression system for the production of large panels of proteins is particularly attractive for the systematic comparison of antigens in diagnostic, immuno-epidemiological, or vaccination studies, and we have used this approach previously to identify potentially protective antibodies against malaria [24, 25, 30].

Mass administration of praziquantel to schoolchildren has been the mainstay of control programs against schistosomiasis, and this has proved relatively successful in reducing parasite burdens and contributing to elimination from some areas [37]. Continued surveillance and early detection of new cases remains critical to avoid any risk of resurgence; however, the commonly used Kato-Katz method is not sensitive enough to detect low levels of parasitemia, resulting in the underestimation of the real number of cases [7]. Detection of parasite-derived glycans such as CAA in the urine or serum of patients by lateral-flow test is currently considered the most sensitive assay for the detection of current Schistosoma infections because it can detect very low infection levels and reactivity disappears rapidly after praziquantel treatment [8, 38]. In areas where schistosomiasis has been eliminated or is close to elimination, alternative methods of surveillance might be needed. By persisting several months or even years after infection [39], antibody responses provide a useful historical measure of parasite exposure to monitor populations at risk of resurgence. Currently, most host antibody responses are measured against crude parasite preparations such SEA or SWAP, which may suffer from considerable cross-reactivity with other helminths antigens. Therefore, species-specific recombinant proteins as diagnostic tools could be more reliable.

A striking feature of this study is the relatively small number of antigens eliciting a patent immune response in the few weeks after a primary infection. In humans, almost no IgM/IgG response could be detected before 4 to 5 weeks postinfection: some antigens might be more highly expressed at later stages of parasite development, or the parasite could evade the host immune response. Subsequently, antibody responses were almost exclusively directed at secreted proteins belonging to the saposin and cathepsin families. Of the 9 proteins reactive in all human volunteers before 12 weeks, 5 contained saposin domains and 3 were cathepsins. It is interesting to note that several saposin domain-containing proteins from Schistosoma japonicum have been proposed as markers of infections in mice and humans [40–42], whereas proteins 66 and 67, 2 isoforms of the cathepsin B1 protease, seem to have built-in adjuvanticity [43]. Both saposins and cathepsins are produced by the schistosome’s alimentary tract and have been involved in the digestion of lipids and proteins [44, 45]. Their reactivity to the host humoral system suggests they are produced by the parasite at an early stage. Although 5 of the 6 saposin-domain-containing proteins present in the library were immunoreactive (although reactivity of protein 83 remained modest up to 12 weeks), they share only 9% to 28% sequence identity, making cross-reactivity unlikely. The dynamics of the host response to the recombinant saposins closely parallels the detection of the parasite CAA glycans in the sera of infected patients, which is first detected at 4 weeks [38].

Reactivity to members of the uPAR/Ly6 domain-containing family, which are expressed at the somule and adult stages [46–48], was also consistently observed across human and murine samples. In our study, reactivity to Ly6F, Ly6B, and Ly6D (proteins 3, 10, and 41, respectively) was observed in both human and mouse serum samples, whereas reactivity to Ly6A and Ly6I (proteins 11 and 2, respectively) was only detected in human samples. Three of these proteins (Ly6B, Ly6D, and Ly6F) have been shown to elicit strong antibody responses in rat, mouse, and human sera [48]. Although they share some homology with the complement-inactivating Cd59 protein, they do not seem to have conserved the same function [46].

CONCLUSIONS

By producing recombinant proteins in a mammalian expression system, we have paid particular attention to their correct folding, and thus this new resource could be used in a wide range of cellular and molecular assays such as vaccine screening [49], cellular assays looking at immunomodulatory functions, immunoepidemiological studies, or the identification of host binding partners by receptor-ligand screening. We envisage these proteins will be useful to the wider scientific community to further understand Schistosoma biology.

Notes

Acknowledgments. We thank Catherine McCarthy for technical help and David Dunne for helpful discussions on the study design.

Financial support. This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust (Grant 206194).

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.

Presented in part: Joint Spring Meeting of the British Society for Parasitology, April 2019, Manchester, UK.

References

1.

World Health Organization
.
Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiases: number of people treated in 2016
.
Wkly Epidemiol Rec
2017
;
92
:
749
60
.

2.

Colley
DG
,
Bustinduy
AL
,
Secor
WE
,
King
CH
.
Human schistosomiasis
.
Lancet
2014
;
383
:
2253
64
.

3.

Cousin
CE
,
Stirewalt
MA
,
Dorsey
CH
.
Schistosoma mansoni: ultrastructure of early transformation of skin- and shear-pressure-derived schistosomules
.
Exp Parasitol
1981
;
51
:
341
65
.

4.

Cheever
AW
,
Macedonia
JG
,
Mosimann
JE
,
Cheever
EA
.
Kinetics of egg production and egg excretion by Schistosoma mansoni and S. japonicum in mice infected with a single pair of worms
.
Am J Trop Med Hyg
1994
;
50
:
281
95
.

5.

Burke
ML
,
Jones
MK
,
Gobert
GN
,
Li
YS
,
Ellis
MK
,
McManus
DP
.
Immunopathogenesis of human schistosomiasis
.
Parasite Immunol
2009
;
31
:
163
76
.

6.

Colley
DG
,
Andros
TS
,
Campbell
CH
Jr
.
Schistosomiasis is more prevalent than previously thought: what does it mean for public health goals, policies, strategies, guidelines and intervention programs?
Infect Dis Poverty
2017
;
6
:
63
.

7.

Ogongo
P
,
Kariuki
TM
,
Wilson
RA
.
Diagnosis of Schistosomiasis mansoni: an evaluation of existing methods and research towards single worm pair detection
.
Parasitology
2018
;
145
:
1355
66
.

8.

Corstjens
PL
,
Nyakundi
RK
,
de Dood
CJ
, et al.
Improved sensitivity of the urine CAA lateral-flow assay for diagnosing active Schistosoma infections by using larger sample volumes
.
Parasit Vectors
2015
;
8
:
241
.

9.

Clements
MN
,
Corstjens
PLAM
,
Binder
S
, et al.
Latent class analysis to evaluate performance of point-of-care CCA for low-intensity Schistosoma mansoni infections in Burundi
.
Parasit Vectors
2018
;
11
:
111
.

10.

van Dam
GJ
,
de Dood
CJ
,
Lewis
M
, et al.
A robust dry reagent lateral flow assay for diagnosis of active schistosomiasis by detection of Schistosoma circulating anodic antigen
.
Exp Parasitol
2013
;
135
:
274
82
.

11.

Hinz
R
,
Schwarz
NG
,
Hahn
A
,
Frickmann
H
.
Serological approaches for the diagnosis of schistosomiasis - A review
.
Mol Cell Probes
2017
;
31
:
2
21
.

12.

Berriman
M
,
Haas
BJ
,
LoVerde
PT
, et al.
The genome of the blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni
.
Nature
2009
;
460
:
352
8
.

13.

Braschi
S
,
Borges
WC
,
Wilson
RA
.
Proteomic analysis of the schistosome tegument and its surface membranes
.
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz
2006
;
101
(Suppl 1)
:
205
12
.

14.

Braschi
S
,
Wilson
RA
.
Proteins exposed at the adult schistosome surface revealed by biotinylation
.
Mol Cell Proteomics
2006
;
5
:
347
56
.

15.

Castro-Borges
W
,
Dowle
A
,
Curwen
RS
,
Thomas-Oates
J
,
Wilson
RA
.
Enzymatic shaving of the tegument surface of live schistosomes for proteomic analysis: a rational approach to select vaccine candidates
.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis
2011
;
5
:
e993
.

16.

Curwen
RS
,
Ashton
PD
,
Sundaralingam
S
,
Wilson
RA
.
Identification of novel proteases and immunomodulators in the secretions of schistosome cercariae that facilitate host entry
.
Mol Cell Proteomics
2006
;
5
:
835
44
.

17.

Wilson
RA
.
Proteomics at the schistosome-mammalian host interface: any prospects for diagnostics or vaccines?
Parasitology
2012
;
139
:
1178
94
.

18.

Knudsen
GM
,
Medzihradszky
KF
,
Lim
KC
,
Hansell
E
,
McKerrow
JH
.
Proteomic analysis of Schistosoma mansoni cercarial secretions
.
Mol Cell Proteomics
2005
;
4
:
1862
75
.

19.

Sotillo
J
,
Pearson
M
,
Becker
L
,
Mulvenna
J
,
Loukas
A
.
A quantitative proteomic analysis of the tegumental proteins from Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula reveals novel potential therapeutic targets
.
Int J Parasitol
2015
;
45
:
505
16
.

20.

Sotillo
J
,
Pearson
M
,
Potriquet
J
, et al.
Extracellular vesicles secreted by Schistosoma mansoni contain protein vaccine candidates
.
Int J Parasitol
2016
;
46
:
1
5
.

21.

Collins
JJ
3rd,
Wendt
GR
,
Iyer
H
,
Newmark
PA
.
Stem cell progeny contribute to the schistosome host-parasite interface
.
Elife
2016
;
5
:
e12473
.

22.

Farias
LP
,
Tararam
CA
,
Miyasato
PA
, et al.
Screening the Schistosoma mansoni transcriptome for genes differentially expressed in the schistosomulum stage in search for vaccine candidates
.
Parasitol Res
2011
;
108
:
123
35
.

23.

Parker-Manuel
SJ
,
Ivens
AC
,
Dillon
GP
,
Wilson
RA
.
Gene expression patterns in larval Schistosoma mansoni associated with infection of the mammalian host
.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis
2011
;
5
:
e1274
.

24.

Crosnier
C
,
Wanaguru
M
,
McDade
B
, et al.
A library of functional recombinant cell-surface and secreted P. falciparum merozoite proteins
.
Mol Cell Proteomics
2013
;
12
:
3976
86
.

25.

Osier
FH
,
Mackinnon
MJ
,
Crosnier
C
, et al.
New antigens for a multicomponent blood-stage malaria vaccine
.
Sci Transl Med
2014
;
6
:
247ra102
.

26.

Protasio
AV
,
van Dongen
S
,
Collins
J
, et al.
MiR-277/4989 regulate transcriptional landscape during juvenile to adult transition in the parasitic helminth Schistosoma mansoni
.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis
2017
;
11
:
e0005559
.

27.

Robinson
MD
,
Oshlack
A
.
A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data
.
Genome Biol
2010
;
11
:
R25
.

28.

Bendtsen
JD
,
Nielsen
H
,
von Heijne
G
,
Brunak
S
.
Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0
.
J Mol Biol
2004
;
340
:
783
95
.

29.

Sonnhammer
EL
,
von Heijne
G
,
Krogh
A
.
A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences
.
Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol
1998
;
6
:
175
82
.

30.

Zenonos
ZA
,
Rayner
JC
,
Wright
GJ
.
Towards a comprehensive Plasmodium falciparum merozoite cell surface and secreted recombinant protein library
.
Malar J
2014
;
13
:
93
.

31.

Kabatereine
NB
,
Vennervald
BJ
,
Ouma
JH
, et al.
Adult resistance to Schistosomiasis mansoni: age-dependence of reinfection remains constant in communities with diverse exposure patterns
.
Parasitology
1999
;
118 (Pt 1)
:
101
5
.

32.

Naus
CW
,
Booth
M
,
Jones
FM
, et al.
The relationship between age, sex, egg-count and specific antibody responses against Schistosoma mansoni antigens in a Ugandan fishing community
.
Trop Med Int Health
2003
;
8
:
561
8
.

33.

Langenberg
MCC
,
Hoogerwerf
MA
,
Koopman
JPR
, et al.
A controlled human Schistosoma mansoni infection model to advance novel drugs, vaccines and diagnostics
.
Nat Med
2020
;
26
:
326
32
.

34.

Janse
JJ
,
Langenberg
MCC
,
Kos-Van Oosterhoud
J
, et al.
Establishing the production of male Schistosoma mansoni cercariae for a controlled human infection model
.
J Infect Dis
2018
;
218
:
1142
6
.

35.

Gaze
S
,
Driguez
P
,
Pearson
MS
, et al.
An immunomics approach to schistosome antigen discovery: antibody signatures of naturally resistant and chronically infected individuals from endemic areas
.
PLoS Pathog
2014
;
10
:
e1004033
.

36.

de Assis
RR
,
Ludolf
F
,
Nakajima
R
, et al.
A next-generation proteome array for Schistosoma mansoni
.
Int J Parasitol
2016
;
46
:
411
5
.

37.

Deol
AK
,
Fleming
FM
,
Calvo-Urbano
B
, et al.
Schistosomiasis - Assessing progress toward the 2020 and 2025 global goals
.
N Engl J Med
2019
;
381
:
2519
28
.

38.

van Grootveld
R
,
van Dam
GJ
,
de Dood
C
, et al.
Improved diagnosis of active Schistosoma infection in travellers and migrants using the ultra-sensitive in-house lateral flow test for detection of circulating anodic antigen (CAA) in serum
.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
2018
;
37
:
1709
16
.

39.

Yong
MK
,
Beckett
CL
,
Leder
K
,
Biggs
BA
,
Torresi
J
,
O’Brien
DP
.
Long-term follow-up of schistosomiasis serology post-treatment in Australian travelers and immigrants
.
J Travel Med
2010
;
17
:
89
93
.

40.

Cai
P
,
Weerakoon
KG
,
Mu
Y
, et al.
A parallel comparison of antigen candidates for development of an optimized serological diagnosis of Schistosomiasis japonica in the Philippines
.
EBioMedicine
2017
;
24
:
237
46
.

41.

Liu
S
,
Zhou
X
,
Piao
X
, et al.
Saposin-like proteins, a multigene family of schistosoma species, are biomarkers for the immunodiagnosis of Schistosomiasis japonica
.
J Infect Dis
2016
;
214
:
1225
34
.

42.

Xu
X
,
Zhang
Y
,
Lin
D
, et al.
Serodiagnosis of Schistosoma japonicum infection: genome-wide identification of a protein marker, and assessment of its diagnostic validity in a field study in China
.
Lancet Infect Dis
2014
;
14
:
489
97
.

43.

El Ridi
R
,
Tallima
H
,
Selim
S
, et al.
Cysteine peptidases as schistosomiasis vaccines with inbuilt adjuvanticity
.
PLoS One
2014
;
9
:
e85401
.

44.

Don
TA
,
Bethony
JM
,
Loukas
A
.
Saposin-like proteins are expressed in the gastrodermis of Schistosoma mansoni and are immunogenic in natural infections
.
Int J Infect Dis
2008
;
12
:
e39
47
.

45.

Skelly
PJ
,
Da’dara
AA
,
Li
XH
,
Castro-Borges
W
,
Wilson
RA
.
Schistosome feeding and regurgitation
.
PLoS Pathog
2014
;
10
:
e1004246
.

46.

Farias
LP
,
Krautz-Peterson
G
,
Tararam
CA
, et al.
On the three-finger protein domain fold and CD59-like proteins in Schistosoma mansoni
.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis
2013
;
7
:
e2482
.

47.

Chalmers
IW
,
Fitzsimmons
CM
,
Brown
M
, et al.
Human IgG1 responses to surface localised Schistosoma mansoni Ly6 family members drop following praziquantel treatment
.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis
2015
;
9
:
e0003920
.

48.

Krautz-Peterson
G
,
Debatis
M
,
Tremblay
JM
, et al.
Schistosoma mansoni infection of mice, rats and humans elicits a strong antibody response to a limited number of reduction-sensitive epitopes on five major tegumental membrane proteins
.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis
2017
;
11
:
e0005306
.

49.

Crosnier
C
,
Brandt
C
,
Rinaldi
G
, et al.
Systematic screening of 96 Schistosoma mansoni cell-surface and secreted antigens does not identify any strongly protective vaccine candidates in a mouse model of infection
.
Wellcome Open Res
2019
;
4
:
159
.

50.

Hall
SL
,
Braschi
S
,
Truscott
M
,
Mathieson
W
,
Cesari
IM
,
Wilson
RA
.
Insights into blood feeding by schistosomes from a proteomic analysis of worm vomitus
.
Mol Biochem Parasitol
2011
;
179
:
18
29
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.