In this article we review several paraconsistent logics from different authors to ‘close the gaps’ between them. Since paraconsistent logics is a broad area of research, it is possible that equivalent paraconsistent logics have different names. What we meant is that we provide connections between the logics studied comparing their different semantical approaches for a near future be able to obtain missing semantical characterization of different logics. We are introducing the term $$RC$$-$$type$$ logics to denote a class of logics that extends $$C_\omega$$ and satisfies the RC rule.

You do not currently have access to this article.