Abstract

Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), a biocide used in a wide variety of disinfection and preservation applications, is a polydisperse mixture in which the end-groups may be any combination of amine, guanidine and cyanoguanidine. Using PHMB model compounds (1,6-diaminohexane; 1,6-diguanidinohexane; 1,6-di(cyanoguanidino)hexane; 4-guanidinobutyric acid), we have determined the biodegradation characteristics of each end-group in several strains of bacteria isolated for their ability to utilise PHMB as a sole source of nitrogen. Bacteria were screened for growth at the expense of each model compound (at non-inhibitory concentrations) as sole nitrogen source. None of the isolated bacteria was capable of utilising a cyanoguanidine end-group as growth substrate, whereas several bacteria were shown to utilise amine or guanidine end-groups. In particular, a strain of Pseudomonas putida was capable of extensive growth with 1,6-diguanidinohexane as a sole nitrogen source, with complete removal of guanidine groups from culture medium within 2 days, and with concomitant formation of unsubstituted urea, which in turn was also utilised by the organism. We conclude that whilst amine and guanidine end-groups in PHMB are likely to be susceptible to biodegradation, cyanoguanidine end-groups are likely to be recalcitrant.

Introduction

Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), first synthesised by Rose and Swain [24], is a cationic polymeric biocide based upon biguanide chemistry. Although compounds containing the biguanide unit have found utility as hypoglycemic agents [16], PHMB and related compounds such as chlorhexidine [25] and alexidine [11] are used primarily as biocides. Indeed, PHMB is utilised in a wide variety of antibacterial applications including industrial disinfection, preservation of cosmetics and as an antibacterial treatment for textiles.

Preparations of PHMB are polydisperse mixtures of polymeric biguanides (Fig. 1), with a weighted average number (n) of 12 repeating hexamethylene biguanide units, ranging from n=2 to n=40. The heterogeneity of the molecule is increased further by the presence of either amine, or cyanoguanidine or guanidine end-groups in any combination at the terminal positions of each chain (Fig. 1). The basicity of the biguanide group (pK  a=10.96 [13]) means that each biguanide unit carries a positive charge at physiological pH. Consequently, PHMB is highly adsorptive to anionic surfaces such as bacterial cell walls and indeed its mechanism of biocidal action is considered to be damage to the cytoplasmic membrane [7]. Recent work [1] has shown that at lower concentrations, PHMB may exert its bacteriostatic effects at least partly by a strong cooperative interaction with (polyanionic) nucleic acids.
Molecular structure of polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) and model compounds. I, polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), indicating end-groups X and Y as any possible combination of (i), amino; (ii), guanidino; (iii), cyanoguanidino; II, 1,6-diaminohexane (DAH); III, 1,6-di(cyanoguanidino)hexane (DCGH; N′,N′′-bis(N-cyanoamidino)-1,6-diaminohexane); IV, 1,6-diguanidinohexane (DGH); V, 4-guanidinobutyric acid (GBA)
Fig. 1

Molecular structure of polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) and model compounds. I, polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), indicating end-groups X and Y as any possible combination of (i), amino; (ii), guanidino; (iii), cyanoguanidino; II, 1,6-diaminohexane (DAH); III, 1,6-di(cyanoguanidino)hexane (DCGH; N′,N′′-bis(N-cyanoamidino)-1,6-diaminohexane); IV, 1,6-diguanidinohexane (DGH); V, 4-guanidinobutyric acid (GBA)

Currently, there exists a requirement to determine the environmental fate and behaviour (including biodegradation) of biocides placed on the market in the European Union, as detailed in the Biocidal Products Directive, Chapter 2 [14]. As biocides are by nature toxic to microorganisms, determination of biocide biodegradability is hampered by inhibition or destruction of potential biodegrading microorganisms. For example, the failure of attempts to isolate significant numbers of microorganisms capable of biodegradation of quaternary ammonium compounds [12, 17] was probably due to the biocidal concentrations employed during the experimentation. In addition, because cationic biocides such as PHMB are highly adsorptive on many solids [15], it is critical that a distinction is made between cationic biocide losses from solution due to biodegradation and adsorption mechanisms [30].

Hence, the study of PHMB biodegradability is confounded by its structural complexity and heterogeneity in terms of chain length and end-groups, its biocidal nature and its propensity for adsorption. To alleviate some of the technical problems associated with determining biodegradability of the molecule, we adopted a reductive approach by using model compounds to assess potential for biodegradation of specific structural motifs. This strategy has been employed previously to study biodegradation of complex structures such as lignin [20, 21] and humic acids [8]. Moreover, it is recognised that the presence of certain structural moieties in a molecule that are more susceptible to microbial attack will promote biodegradation [5]. In particular for polymeric molecules, biodegradation of 3-hydroxybutyrate oligomers has been shown to be dependent on end-group identity [6]. In order to explore the effect of end-group structure in determining biodegradability of PHMB, we tested model compounds, based on the hexamethylene chain of PHMB and terminated with either amine, guanidine or cyanoguanidine end-groupings, for their ability to support growth of microorganisms isolated from enrichment culture in which PHMB was the sole source of nitrogen. The model compounds chosen were (see Fig. 1) 1,6-diaminohexane (DAH), 1,6-diguanidinohexane (DGH), 1,6-di(cyanoguanidino)hexane (DCGH), and 4-guanidinobutyric acid (GBA). These compounds all display lower biocidal activity and decreased propensity for adsorption than PHMB but retained the functional groups of interest that are present in the termini of normal PHMB molecules (Fig. 1).

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Polyhexamethylene biguanide and 1,6-di(cyanoguanidino)hexane (DCGH) were obtained from Avecia (Grangemouth, UK). 1,6-Diguanidinohexane (DGH; as the sulphate salt) was synthesised in the research laboratories of Arch Chemicals (Manchester, UK). The purity of DGH was established by NMR spectroscopy, ES mass spectrometry and elemental analysis. 1-Amino-4-guanidinobutane (agmatine, sulphate salt), 1,4-diaminobutane dihydrochloride (DAB), 1,6-diaminohexane (DAH), 1,4-diguanidinobutane (DGB, arcaine, sulphate salt) and 4-guanidinobutyric acid (GBA) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, UK). Working solutions of PHMB, DAH and GBA were prepared in MilliQ (type II, 18 Mohm) high purity water. DGH and DCGH were dissolved in warm 0.075 M HCl and in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), respectively. All other chemicals were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK) and were of the highest purity available.

Culture media

In liquid culture, bacteria were generally grown in basal salts medium amended with defined carbon and nitrogen sources as required. Nitrogen-free basal salts solution (1× strength) contained the following (per litre), K2HPO4, 3.5 g; KH2PO4, 1.5 g; NaCl, 0.5 g; MgSO4, 0.12 g and 1 ml of trace elements solution. Trace elements solution contained (per litre), Na2B4O7, 0.57 g; FeCl3·6H2O, 0.24 g; CoCl2·6H2O, 0.04 g; CuSO4·5H2O, 0.06 g; MnCl2·4H2O, 0.03 g; ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.31 g and Na2MoO4·2H2O, 0.03 g. R2A agar was used as a growth medium for agar plates (B.D., Oxford, UK).

Enrichment and isolation of microorganisms

Microorganisms capable of growth at the expense of PHMB as sole nitrogen source were isolated from activated sewage by enrichment culture. The composition of the initial enrichment culture (250 ml flask size) was 5 ml of 20% (w/v) glycerol solution, 4 ml of 2.25 mg l−l PHMB solution, 10 ml of a 10× strength solution of basal salts medium, 0.4 ml of a washed sewage sediment sample, made up to 100 ml with settled sewage supernatant. The enrichment culture was incubated at 30°C and 180 rpm in an orbital incubator for 7 days.

Sewage sediment was washed to remove dissolved nitrogen compounds, which might otherwise serve as alternative N-sources to PHMB in enrichment cultures. Washed sewage sediment was obtained by subjecting 50 ml of aerated activated sewage (from a municipal sewage treatment works, Coslech, South Wales, UK) to six successive washing cycles each comprising centrifugation (900g for 5 min), removal of the supernatant and re-suspension of the pellet in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 20 ml of 0.85% (w/v) NaCl/10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7). The final pellet was re-suspended in 10 ml of PBS. Settled sewage supernatant was obtained by allowing activated sewage to settle under gravity for 2 h, after which the upper layer was collected.

After the initial round of growth, five further rounds of serial sub-cultures were conducted at weekly intervals in 250 ml flasks, each containing 5 ml of 20% (w/v) glycerol solution, 4 ml of 2.25 mg l−l PHMB solution, 90 ml of basal salts medium, and 1 ml of inoculum from the previous culture vessel. In addition, from round two of enrichment, a second enrichment regime was initiated which differed only in that a semi-continuous addition of PHMB was made (4 ml aliquots of 2.25 mg l−1 PHMB added at day 2, 4 and 6 of each round of culture).

Isolation of microorganisms was performed by plating out aliquots (0.1 ml) of appropriate dilutions of medium from the final enrichment flasks onto R2A agar plates and incubating at 30°C for 5 days. Isolates distinguished by colony morphology were sub-cultured on fresh R2A plates until axenic. After sufficient growth, strains were preserved for long-term storage at −70°C using the Protect™ microbiological bead storage system (Technical Service Consultants Ltd, Lancs, UK). Short-term storage was achieved on R2A agar slopes, which were stored at room temperature in the dark, and sub-cultured every 2 months.

Identification of microorganisms

A Gram determination for each bacterial isolate was conducted using either traditional methods [9], or using a KOH-based method [22]. For the majority of the isolated microorganisms, template DNA for PCR amplification was prepared by re-suspending a bacterial colony in 0.1 ml of sterile high purity water, centrifuging at 13,000g for 2 min, resuspending as before, and heating at 96°C for 5 min. Supernatant from this lysate was removed by centrifugation (13,000g, 2 min) and retained as template. In cases where it proved difficult to amplify PCR product, the alternative method of Ausubel et al. [4] was used to isolate template DNA.

Recommended [18] bacterial 16S rRNA gene primers 63f (5-CAG GCC TAA CAC ATG CAA GTC-3) and 1387r (5-GGG CGG WGT GTA CAA GGC-3), where W is A or T, were obtained from Invitrogen (Paisley, UK) and used to amplify a 1.4 kb 16S rDNA gene fragment. PCR reaction mixtures contained the following components: genomic DNA template (undetermined mass of DNA, 1 μl of template solution used), 1.25 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Southampton, UK), 5 μl of 10× PCR buffer (MgCl2 free), 0.75 mM MgCl2, 2 ng of each primer and 250 μM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate; reaction volumes were made up to 50 μl with sterile milliQ water. PCR amplification was performed in a Primus PCR Thermo-cycler (MWG-Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany), programmed to perform a denaturing step at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 30 rounds of temperature cycling at 92°C for 20 s, 55°C for 30 s and 75°C for 30 s. A final extension step at 75°C for 5 min was conducted before cooling to 4°C.

The PCR products (4 μl) were examined by agarose gel (1%, w/v) electrophoresis (200 V, 150 mA, 30 min in TBE buffer containing 0.5 μg ml−1 ethidium bromide). The remaining PCR products were then purified using a Qiagen QIAquick PCR purification kit (Crawley, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequences of PCR products were determined (using the 63f primer and an ABI Prism 377 DNA Sequencer) and compared with known sequences in the EMBL database using a BLASTN search program [2] to identify sequence alignments. When obtained sequences were 97–100% identical to strains present in the EMBL database, the corresponding bacterial designations were made at species level, whereas those that possessed a sequence identity of less than 97% were made at genus level [28].

Determination of maximum non-inhibitory concentration for model compounds

Each bacterial isolate was grown on R2A agar plates at 30°C for 48 h, and confluent biomass was re-suspended in sterile PBS to an attenuance (D  590 nm) of 0.5 (2 cm path length). Each bacterial suspension (0.3 ml) was combined with 29.7 ml of basal salts medium containing 10 g l−1 glycerol and 0.05 g l−1 NH4Cl as carbon and nitrogen sources, respectively. Aliquots (0.2 ml) of each diluted cell-suspension were added to wells in the first column of a 96-well plate and 0.1 ml aliquots to the remaining wells. Aliquots (0.02 ml) of working solutions of test compound (either DGH, DCGH, DAH or GBA, 3,080 mg N l−1) were added to the first column to produce 280 mg N l−1. Serial (twofold) dilution of each compound was then achieved by sequential transfer of 0.1 ml samples from well to well across each row, with mixing between transfers. Growth of bacteria in microtitre plates amended with test compounds was compared with growth in control plates treated identically except that the initial amendment to the first well was with the corresponding working solution solvent (i.e. water for DAH and GBA; 0.075 M HCl for DGH and DMSO for DCGH). Plates were incubated at 30°C and after 48 h, attenuance (D  540 nm) of each well was determined using a Thermomax microtitre plate reader (Molecular Devices, Wokingham, UK).

Growth of enrichment culture isolates on model compounds as sole source of nitrogen

Growth of each bacterial isolate at the expense of either DGH, DCGH, DAH or GBA was determined at a range of concentrations up to 280 mg N l−1 in microtitre plates in a manner identical to that used to determine maximum non-inhibitory concentrations (MNICs) for each compound, except that NH4Cl was omitted from the basal salts medium, thus forcing organisms to utilise model compounds as sources of nitrogen for growth. Control plates lacked all nitrogen sources. Attenuance (D  540 nm) was determined over a period of 7 days.

Growth of Pseudomonas putida at the expense of DGH

P. putida, isolated in this study from enrichment culture using PHMB as a sole source of nitrogen (see Table 1), was grown in 50 ml of basal salts medium (100 ml flask size), containing glycerol (1%, v/v) and DGH (680 mg l−1; equivalent to 190 mg N l−1) as sole nitrogen source. Cultures were incubated at 30°C and 180 rpm and at intervals samples (0.2 ml) were removed for determination of growth by measurement of attenuance (D  540 nm). At the same times, 0.5 ml aliquots of culture medium were removed and retained at −20°C for later chemical analysis.

Identification of microorganisms isolated from enrichment culture, amended with PHMB as a sole source of nitrogen. Isolate designation was conducted by amplification of a 16S rRNA gene fragment, and comparison of the resultant gene sequences to those contained in the EMBL sequence database

StrainClosest matchDesignation of isolateb
OrganismSimilarity between test and database sequenceaEMBL accession number
1Uncultured β-proteobacterium674/692 (97%)AB112464Strain LPO1
2Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LDVH 337.01641/650 (98%)AY468482Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LPO2
3Alcaligenes sp. STC1599/603 (99%)AB046605Alcaligenes sp. strain LPO3
4Chryseobacterium indologenes512/546 (93%)AY050493Chryseobacterium sp. strain LPO4
5Pseudomonas putida (strain JCM 6156 [ATCC 33015])623/630 (99%)D37924Pseudomonas putida strain LPO5
6Klebsiella pneumoniae strain ATCC 13884T601/622 (97%)Y17657Klebsiella pneumoniae strain LPO6
7Burkholderia sp. KBC-4592/609 (97%)AY769905Burkholderia sp. stain LPO7
8Acinetobacter sp. (strain ATCC 9957) or Acinetobacter lwoffii (DSM2403)456/474 (96%)Z93442 or X81665Acinetobacter sp. strain LPO8
StrainClosest matchDesignation of isolateb
OrganismSimilarity between test and database sequenceaEMBL accession number
1Uncultured β-proteobacterium674/692 (97%)AB112464Strain LPO1
2Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LDVH 337.01641/650 (98%)AY468482Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LPO2
3Alcaligenes sp. STC1599/603 (99%)AB046605Alcaligenes sp. strain LPO3
4Chryseobacterium indologenes512/546 (93%)AY050493Chryseobacterium sp. strain LPO4
5Pseudomonas putida (strain JCM 6156 [ATCC 33015])623/630 (99%)D37924Pseudomonas putida strain LPO5
6Klebsiella pneumoniae strain ATCC 13884T601/622 (97%)Y17657Klebsiella pneumoniae strain LPO6
7Burkholderia sp. KBC-4592/609 (97%)AY769905Burkholderia sp. stain LPO7
8Acinetobacter sp. (strain ATCC 9957) or Acinetobacter lwoffii (DSM2403)456/474 (96%)Z93442 or X81665Acinetobacter sp. strain LPO8

aCalculated as number of bases identical/total number compared

bDesignated strain is provided at species level where similarity between test and database sequence is 97% or above, and at genus level for similarity of below 97%

Identification of microorganisms isolated from enrichment culture, amended with PHMB as a sole source of nitrogen. Isolate designation was conducted by amplification of a 16S rRNA gene fragment, and comparison of the resultant gene sequences to those contained in the EMBL sequence database

StrainClosest matchDesignation of isolateb
OrganismSimilarity between test and database sequenceaEMBL accession number
1Uncultured β-proteobacterium674/692 (97%)AB112464Strain LPO1
2Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LDVH 337.01641/650 (98%)AY468482Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LPO2
3Alcaligenes sp. STC1599/603 (99%)AB046605Alcaligenes sp. strain LPO3
4Chryseobacterium indologenes512/546 (93%)AY050493Chryseobacterium sp. strain LPO4
5Pseudomonas putida (strain JCM 6156 [ATCC 33015])623/630 (99%)D37924Pseudomonas putida strain LPO5
6Klebsiella pneumoniae strain ATCC 13884T601/622 (97%)Y17657Klebsiella pneumoniae strain LPO6
7Burkholderia sp. KBC-4592/609 (97%)AY769905Burkholderia sp. stain LPO7
8Acinetobacter sp. (strain ATCC 9957) or Acinetobacter lwoffii (DSM2403)456/474 (96%)Z93442 or X81665Acinetobacter sp. strain LPO8
StrainClosest matchDesignation of isolateb
OrganismSimilarity between test and database sequenceaEMBL accession number
1Uncultured β-proteobacterium674/692 (97%)AB112464Strain LPO1
2Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LDVH 337.01641/650 (98%)AY468482Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LPO2
3Alcaligenes sp. STC1599/603 (99%)AB046605Alcaligenes sp. strain LPO3
4Chryseobacterium indologenes512/546 (93%)AY050493Chryseobacterium sp. strain LPO4
5Pseudomonas putida (strain JCM 6156 [ATCC 33015])623/630 (99%)D37924Pseudomonas putida strain LPO5
6Klebsiella pneumoniae strain ATCC 13884T601/622 (97%)Y17657Klebsiella pneumoniae strain LPO6
7Burkholderia sp. KBC-4592/609 (97%)AY769905Burkholderia sp. stain LPO7
8Acinetobacter sp. (strain ATCC 9957) or Acinetobacter lwoffii (DSM2403)456/474 (96%)Z93442 or X81665Acinetobacter sp. strain LPO8

aCalculated as number of bases identical/total number compared

bDesignated strain is provided at species level where similarity between test and database sequence is 97% or above, and at genus level for similarity of below 97%

TLC analysis

Retained culture samples were thawed and centrifuged to remove biomass, and aliquots (0.02 ml) analysed by TLC on silica gel plates (250 μm layer thickness, 60 Å particle size, 20×20 cm, Whatman, Maidstone, UK). The chromatograms were developed using butan-1-ol/acetic acid/H2O (3:1:1, by vol.) and subsequently dried at 110°C. Compounds were routinely detected by exposing the plates to I2 vapour.

Determination of urea

After removal of biomass, culture fluid (30 μl) was added to 0.97 ml of H2O and 1 ml of the working reagent, and assayed for urea content as described elsewhere [23]. A calibration curve was constructed using standard solutions of urea. Urea was discriminated from N-substituted ureas by measurement of λ  max for each sample [3], and comparison of the resultant values to those given by standard samples (1 mM) of urea (non-N substituted) and l-citrulline (N-substituted).

Determination of guanidino compounds

After removal of biomass, culture fluid (35 μl) and H2O (0.565 ml) were mixed and added to 0.3 ml of 3 M NaOH and 0.6 ml of the assay reagent. After 10 min, 1.5 ml of deionised H2O was added, and after a further 15 min, the samples were assayed for guanidine-group content as described elsewhere [26]. A calibration curve was constructed by replacing the diluted culture fluid with 0.6 ml aliquots of standard solutions of DGH.

Results

Enrichment and identification of microorganisms

After six rounds of enrichment, five distinct bacterial strains (strains 1–5) were isolated from the single-dose PHMB-enrichment culture, and three other distinct bacterial strains (strains 6–8) were isolated from the semi-continuously dosed PHMB-enrichment culture. All except for strain 1 were Gram negative. Alignment of 16S rRNA gene sequences (of lengths between 474 and 692 base pairs) with those present in the EMBL database resulted in designation of each strain at either species or genus level [28] (Table 1). For strain 8, two sequence alignments with identical scores were given, both for Acinetobacter strains. In addition, for strain 1 the highest scoring sequence alignment was for an uncultured β-proteobacterium, which conflicted with the results of Gram staining. Therefore, strain 1 remained unclassified and was designated as strain LPO1.

Maximum non-inhibitory concentration for model compounds

Table 2 shows the bacteriostatic activity of each model compound for each isolate from enrichment culture. Of the model compounds tested, DAH possessed the greatest bacteriostatic activity, which was observed in the range of 70–140 mg l−1 total nitrogen. DGH only inhibited the growth of the Burkholderia sp. DCGH and GBA did not result in inhibition of growth of any strains in the concentration range tested (0–280 mg N l−1). The MNIC values recorded for each model compound are much higher than those previously reported for PHMB against Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria, which are typically reported in the range of 1–30 mg l−1 [19].

Maximum non-inhibitory concentrations (MNICs) for each model compound against microorganisms isolated from PHMB enrichment culture. Concentration range was 0–280 mg N l  1 for each compound. A value of >280 mg N l  1 is given where no biocidal activity in the concentration range tested was detected

IsolateMNIC (mg N l−1)a
DAHbDGHGBADCGH
Strain LPO1>280>280>280>280
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LPO2>280>280>280>280
Alcaligenes sp. strain LPO370>280>280>280
Chryseobacterium sp. strain LPO4140>280>280>280
Pseudomonas putida strain LPO5140>280>280>280
Klebsiella pneumoniae strain LPO6>280>280>280>280
Burkholderia sp. strain LPO77035>280>280
Acinetobacter sp. strain LPO8140>280>280>280
IsolateMNIC (mg N l−1)a
DAHbDGHGBADCGH
Strain LPO1>280>280>280>280
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LPO2>280>280>280>280
Alcaligenes sp. strain LPO370>280>280>280
Chryseobacterium sp. strain LPO4140>280>280>280
Pseudomonas putida strain LPO5140>280>280>280
Klebsiella pneumoniae strain LPO6>280>280>280>280
Burkholderia sp. strain LPO77035>280>280
Acinetobacter sp. strain LPO8140>280>280>280

aMNIC determinations were conducted in duplicate, of which the lowest determined value is reported

bCompounds tested were DAH, 1,6-diaminohexane; DGH, 1,6-diguanidinohexane; GBA, 4-guanidinobutyric acid; DCGH, 1,6-di(cyanoguanidino)hexane

Maximum non-inhibitory concentrations (MNICs) for each model compound against microorganisms isolated from PHMB enrichment culture. Concentration range was 0–280 mg N l  1 for each compound. A value of >280 mg N l  1 is given where no biocidal activity in the concentration range tested was detected

IsolateMNIC (mg N l−1)a
DAHbDGHGBADCGH
Strain LPO1>280>280>280>280
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LPO2>280>280>280>280
Alcaligenes sp. strain LPO370>280>280>280
Chryseobacterium sp. strain LPO4140>280>280>280
Pseudomonas putida strain LPO5140>280>280>280
Klebsiella pneumoniae strain LPO6>280>280>280>280
Burkholderia sp. strain LPO77035>280>280
Acinetobacter sp. strain LPO8140>280>280>280
IsolateMNIC (mg N l−1)a
DAHbDGHGBADCGH
Strain LPO1>280>280>280>280
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LPO2>280>280>280>280
Alcaligenes sp. strain LPO370>280>280>280
Chryseobacterium sp. strain LPO4140>280>280>280
Pseudomonas putida strain LPO5140>280>280>280
Klebsiella pneumoniae strain LPO6>280>280>280>280
Burkholderia sp. strain LPO77035>280>280
Acinetobacter sp. strain LPO8140>280>280>280

aMNIC determinations were conducted in duplicate, of which the lowest determined value is reported

bCompounds tested were DAH, 1,6-diaminohexane; DGH, 1,6-diguanidinohexane; GBA, 4-guanidinobutyric acid; DCGH, 1,6-di(cyanoguanidino)hexane

Growth of PHMB enrichment-culture isolates on model compounds

Each compound (DAH, DGH, DCGH and GBA) was screened at a range of concentrations up to 280 mg N l−1, for its ability to serve as a sole source of nitrogen for each of the strains isolated using PHMB as a sole source of nitrogen. For comparative purposes, and in order to avoid any complications from inhibition of bacterial growth, Table 3 shows only the highest growth recorded for compounds at concentrations of either 140 mg N l−1 or the MNIC, whichever was the lower (see Table 2). All strains except the Chryseobacterium isolate grew well on the naturally occurring compound GBA. Three of the isolates also grew on DAH for which natural homologues exist, e.g. 1,4-diaminobutane (putrescine). Of the remaining compounds, DCGH was incapable of supporting the growth of any strain tested, but DGH was a good substrate for P. putida and, to a lesser extent, E. meningoseptica (Fig. 2). Growth of P. putida on DGH was therefore selected as a system for further study (see below).

Growth of PHMB enrichment culture isolates at the expense of selected model compounds

IsolateHighest attenuance (D  540) recorded during growth on substrates added at or below MNICa
DAHDGHGBADCGHControlb
Strain LPO10.030.030.660.030.05±0.05
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LPO20.380.230.840.030.06±0.04
Alcaligenes sp. strain LPO30.04c0.040.370.050.04±0.01
Chryseobacterium sp. strain LPO40.030.030.030.040.07±0.08
Pseudomonas putida strain LPO50.490.570.700.080.06±0.01
Klebsiella pneumoniae strain LPO60.540.070.400.040.06±0.04
Burkholderia sp. stain LPO70.07c0.06d0.520.040.06±0.01
Acinetobacter sp. strain LPO80.040.030.450.040.04±0.01
IsolateHighest attenuance (D  540) recorded during growth on substrates added at or below MNICa
DAHDGHGBADCGHControlb
Strain LPO10.030.030.660.030.05±0.05
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LPO20.380.230.840.030.06±0.04
Alcaligenes sp. strain LPO30.04c0.040.370.050.04±0.01
Chryseobacterium sp. strain LPO40.030.030.030.040.07±0.08
Pseudomonas putida strain LPO50.490.570.700.080.06±0.01
Klebsiella pneumoniae strain LPO60.540.070.400.040.06±0.04
Burkholderia sp. stain LPO70.07c0.06d0.520.040.06±0.01
Acinetobacter sp. strain LPO80.040.030.450.040.04±0.01

aGrowth determined at 140 mg N l−1 for compounds that displayed an MNIC of 140 or 280 mg N l−1 (see Table 2)

bControl values are the highest attenuance recorded for control wells where no nitrogen source was added, ±95% confidence limits

cGrowth determined at MNIC of 70 mg N l−1 (Table 2)

dGrowth determined at MNIC of 35 mg N l−1 (Table 2)

Growth of PHMB enrichment culture isolates at the expense of selected model compounds

IsolateHighest attenuance (D  540) recorded during growth on substrates added at or below MNICa
DAHDGHGBADCGHControlb
Strain LPO10.030.030.660.030.05±0.05
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LPO20.380.230.840.030.06±0.04
Alcaligenes sp. strain LPO30.04c0.040.370.050.04±0.01
Chryseobacterium sp. strain LPO40.030.030.030.040.07±0.08
Pseudomonas putida strain LPO50.490.570.700.080.06±0.01
Klebsiella pneumoniae strain LPO60.540.070.400.040.06±0.04
Burkholderia sp. stain LPO70.07c0.06d0.520.040.06±0.01
Acinetobacter sp. strain LPO80.040.030.450.040.04±0.01
IsolateHighest attenuance (D  540) recorded during growth on substrates added at or below MNICa
DAHDGHGBADCGHControlb
Strain LPO10.030.030.660.030.05±0.05
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica strain LPO20.380.230.840.030.06±0.04
Alcaligenes sp. strain LPO30.04c0.040.370.050.04±0.01
Chryseobacterium sp. strain LPO40.030.030.030.040.07±0.08
Pseudomonas putida strain LPO50.490.570.700.080.06±0.01
Klebsiella pneumoniae strain LPO60.540.070.400.040.06±0.04
Burkholderia sp. stain LPO70.07c0.06d0.520.040.06±0.01
Acinetobacter sp. strain LPO80.040.030.450.040.04±0.01

aGrowth determined at 140 mg N l−1 for compounds that displayed an MNIC of 140 or 280 mg N l−1 (see Table 2)

bControl values are the highest attenuance recorded for control wells where no nitrogen source was added, ±95% confidence limits

cGrowth determined at MNIC of 70 mg N l−1 (Table 2)

dGrowth determined at MNIC of 35 mg N l−1 (Table 2)

 
Growth of PHMB enrichment-culture isolates at the expense of DGH (140 mg N l−1) as sole nitrogen source. Growth was measured as attenuance of the culture medium at 540 nm: open circle, strain LPO1; filled circle, E. meningoseptica; open square, Alcaligenes sp.; open triangle, C. indologenes; filled square, P. putida; filled triangle, K. pneumoniae; filled inverted triangle, Burkholderia sp; open inverted triangle, Acinetobacter sp.; open diamond, control (no nitrogen source added) displaying highest recorded attenuance. Error bars indicate 95% confidence limits for control readings (n=36)
Fig. 2

Growth of PHMB enrichment-culture isolates at the expense of DGH (140 mg N l−1) as sole nitrogen source. Growth was measured as attenuance of the culture medium at 540 nm: open circle, strain LPO1; filled circle, E. meningoseptica; open square, Alcaligenes sp.; open triangle, C. indologenes; filled square, P. putida; filled triangle, K. pneumoniae; filled inverted triangle, Burkholderia sp; open inverted triangle, Acinetobacter sp.; open diamond, control (no nitrogen source added) displaying highest recorded attenuance. Error bars indicate 95% confidence limits for control readings (n=36)

Growth of Pseudomonas putida at the expense of DGH

Growth of P. putida on DGH as a sole source of nitrogen was accompanied by the progressive disappearance of DGH in a TLC analysis (Fig. 3) and appearance of several new spots of high mobility (Fig. 3, tracks 5–8). The new components did not correspond in mobility to any nitrogen-containing standards tested (DAH, 1,4-diaminobutane, 1,4-diguanidinobutane, 1-amino-4-guanidinobutane or urea, tracks 10–14, respectively). Urea-based compounds (R  f 0.6) were identified as being present in samples applied to tracks 4–6 (data not shown) by spraying with a diacetyl-monoxime/antipyrine colorimetric reagent mixture.
TLC analysis of DGH degradation in P. putida culture medium. Culture samples were removed at various time points from the culture amended with DGH (680 mg l−1) as sole nitrogen source (see Fig. 2), and subjected to TLC analysis (see Materials and methods). Spots were revealed using I2 vapour. Tracks 1–8, 20 μl of DGH-amended P. putida culture medium, sampled at 0, 26.5, 39.5, 43.5, 45.0, 48, 52 and 87 h, respectively; track 9, standard DGH; track 10, DAH; track 11, DGB; track 12, agmatine; track 13, DAB; track 14, urea; and track 15, glycerol
Fig. 3

TLC analysis of DGH degradation in P. putida culture medium. Culture samples were removed at various time points from the culture amended with DGH (680 mg l−1) as sole nitrogen source (see Fig. 2), and subjected to TLC analysis (see Materials and methods). Spots were revealed using I2 vapour. Tracks 1–8, 20 μl of DGH-amended P. putida culture medium, sampled at 0, 26.5, 39.5, 43.5, 45.0, 48, 52 and 87 h, respectively; track 9, standard DGH; track 10, DAH; track 11, DGB; track 12, agmatine; track 13, DAB; track 14, urea; and track 15, glycerol

The degradation of DGH by P. putida and concomitant formation of urea were quantified by colorimetric assays. The decrease in concentration of DGH from 2.27 mM to 0 over a period of 45 h (Fig. 4) confirmed the results of TLC analysis and showed that this period also corresponded to the period of exponential growth, and to the appearance of urea in the growth medium. The urea released into the culture medium was confirmed as lacking N-substitution by the method of Archibald [3]. The concentration of urea was maximal at 45 h, and was rapidly depleted thereafter. The point of maximum concentration corresponded to the time of fastest growth and to the point of exhaustion of DGH substrate. The detection, by TLC, of urea in samples taken at 43.5, 45 and 48 h was completely consistent with data provided by colorimetric assay of urea. In an independent experiment, P. putida was shown to be capable of utilising urea as a sole nitrogen source (data not shown).
Biodegradation of DGH (680 mg l−1) as sole nitrogen source by P. putida. Bacterial growth (filled circle) was determined as culture attenuance at 540 nm; Concentrations of DGH (filled triangle) and urea (open square) were determined as described in Materials and methods
Fig. 4

Biodegradation of DGH (680 mg l−1) as sole nitrogen source by P. putida. Bacterial growth (filled circle) was determined as culture attenuance at 540 nm; Concentrations of DGH (filled triangle) and urea (open square) were determined as described in Materials and methods

Discussion

All but one of the bacterial strains (Chryseobacterium sp.) used GBA as a sole nitrogen source, and three organisms (P. putida, E. meningoseptica and K. pneumonia) were also capable of using DAH. GBA is formed in fluorescent species of Pseudomonas (including P. putida) as a central intermediate of the arginine oxidase pathway that converts arginine to 4-aminobutyrate via 2-ketoarginine, 4-guanidinobutyraldehyde and GBA [10]. P. putida has also been shown to remove guanidine from GBA via a guanidinebutyrate amidinohydrolase activity [29]. 1,4-Diaminobutane (putrescine), the C4 homologue of DAH, is an intermediate of the arginine decarboxylase pathway, in which arginine is converted to 4-aminobutyrate via 1-amino-4-guanidinobutane (agmatine), N-carbamoylputrescine, putrescine, and 4-aminobutyraldehyde. Putrescine utilisation has been detected in Klebsiella, Pseudomonas (including P. putida) and Aeromonas spp. [10]. Therefore, given the importance of GBA and diaminoalkanes in bacterial metabolism, it is not surprising that several of the PHMB enrichment culture isolates are capable of growth at the expense of DAH and GBA.

Two of the eight bacterial strains were capable of utilising the guanidine end-group model compound DGH as a sole source of nitrogen, of which P. putida displayed the highest growth yield. However, no bacterium was capable of using the cyanoguanidine end-group model compound DCGH. The important implication for degradation of PHMB is therefore that the isolated bacteria are capable of utilising nitrogen from terminal guanidine or amine PHMB end-groups but not from the cyanoguanide end-group. Degradation of bis-guanidino structures has been reported previously, but only for P. putida [31], various other Pseudomonas sp. [29] and a species of Rhodococcus [27]. Therefore, this published evidence is in agreement with the observation that, of the isolates obtained from enrichment culture, P. putida is capable of the most extensive growth using DGH as a sole nitrogen source.

A Rhodococcus sp. is already known to metabolise DGB (1,4-diguanidinobutane; the shorter, C4 homologue of DGH) via initial deamination of one of the terminal guanidino groups to form carbamoylagmatine, followed by hydrolytic removal of the newly formed carbamoyl group to yield agmatine; this two-step reaction is then repeated on the other guanidino end-group to yield putrescine [27]. In this pathway, no urea is liberated. In contrast, P. putida catabolised DGB to agmatine in a single step with formation of urea [31]. To determine which of these mechanisms operates in the degradation of the C6 homologue DGH in our P. putida strain isolated for its ability to grow on PHMB, DGH disappearance and urea formation were monitored by TLC and by quantitative colorimetric analysis. P. putida removed DGH completely from the culture medium with the concomitant formation of urea in a typical precursor–product relationship. Independent experiments established that urea was able to serve as a sole source of nitrogen in P. putida. All of the urea liberated from DGH was released in a non-N-substituted form. All together, these data suggest that P. putida metabolises DGH via 1-amino-6-guanidinohexane (the C6 homologue of agmatine) with concomitant formation of urea (Fig. 5), as previously reported for DGB metabolism in P. putida [31], and not via the pathway for DGB metabolism reported for a Rhodococcus sp., where no urea was liberated [27].
Proposed biodegradation pathway for DGH
Fig. 5

Proposed biodegradation pathway for DGH

Collectively, the data obtained in the growth experiments indicated that microorganisms isolated for their ability to derive nitrogen for growth from PHMB can obtain nitrogen from amine and guanidine end-group structural moieties, but not from cyanoguanidine end-groups. This implies that the PHMB components with cyanoguanidine end-groups are unlikely to be biodegraded at those termini by microorganisms, whereas components with amine and guanidine end-groups are likely to be readily biodegradable. The mechanism of PHMB degradation has yet to be established. However, if it should proceed via an exocleavage mechanism (i.e. progressive degradation from the ends of the molecules) the presence of cyanoguanidine end-groups may inhibit biodegradation for at least a fraction of the PHMB molecules within the heterogeneous mixture. It is expected that an equal ratio of cyanoguanidine, guanidine and amine end-groupings will be present in PHMB. Therefore, we suggest from this evidence that there may be an opportunity to increase the biodegradability of PHMB by lowering the proportion of cyanoguanidine end-groups in the polymeric mixture.

Acknowledgements

This work received support from Avecia Biocides (now Arch Biocides) in the form of chemicals and a studentship to LPOM.

References

1.

Allen
MJ
,
Morby
AP
,
White
GF
Cooperativity in the binding of the cationic biocide polyhexamethylene biguanide to nucleic acids
 
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
 
2004
 
318
 
397
 
404
 

2.

Altschul
SF
,
Madden
TL
,
Schäffer
AA
,
Zhang
J
,
Zhang
Z
,
Miller
W
,
Lipman
DJ
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
 
Nucleic Acids Res
 
1997
 
25
 
3389
 
3402
 

3.

Archibald
RM
Determination of citrulline and allantoin and demonstration of citrulline in blood plasma
 
J Biol Chem
 
1944
 
156
 
121
 
142

4.

Ausubel
F
,
Brent
R
,
Kingston
RE
,
Moore
DD
,
Seidman
JG
,
Smith
JA
,
Struhil
K
 
Current protocols in molecular biology
 
1994
 
New York
 
Wiley

5.

Boethling
RS
Designing biodegradable chemicals
 
ACS Symp Ser
 
1996
 
640
 
156
 
171

6.

Brandl
H
,
Aeberli
B
,
Bachofen
R
,
Schwegler
I
,
Muller
HM
,
Burger
MH
,
Hoffmann
T
,
Lengweiler
UD
,
Seebach
D
Biodegradation of cyclic and substituted linear oligomers of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)
 
Can J Microbiol
 
1995
 
41
 
Suppl 1
 
180
 
186

7.

Broxton
P
,
Woodcock
PM
,
Heatley
F
,
Gilbert
P
Interaction of some polyhexamethylene biguanides and membrane phospholipids in Escherichia coli
 
J Appl Bacteriol
 
1984
 
57
 
115
 
124

8.

Cervantes
FJ
,
Dijksma
W
,
Duong-Dac
T
,
Ivanova
A
,
Lettinga
G
,
Field
JA
Anaerobic mineralization of toluene by enriched sediments with quinones and humus as terminal electron acceptors
 
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
2001
 
67
 
4471
 
4478
 

9.

Collins
CH
,
Patricia
ML
 
Microbial methods
 
1984
 
London
 
Butterworth

10.

Cunin
R
,
Glansdorff
N
,
Piérard
A
,
Stalon
V
Biosynthesis and metabolism of arginine in bacteria
 
Microbiol Rev
 
1986
 
50
 
314
 
352

11.

Cutler
RA
,
Diana
GD
,
Schalit
S
Bisbiguanides, a new series of antimicrobial agents
 
Soap Chem Spec
 
1966
 
2
 
45
 
49

12.

Dean-Raymond
D
,
Alexander
M
Bacterial metabolism of quaternary ammonium compounds
 
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
1977
 
33
 
1037
 
1041

13.

East
GC
,
McIntyre
JE
,
Shao
J
Polybiguanides: synthesis and characterization of polybiguanides containing hexamethylene groups
 
Polymer
 
1997
 
38
 
3973
 
3984
 

14.

European Union (2000) Common core data set for active substances and biocidal products. In: Technical guidance document in support of the directive 99/8/EC concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market—guidance on data requirements for active substances and biocidal products, version 4.3.2, pp 27–49

15.

van Ginkel
CG
Porter
MR
,
Karsa
RD
Biodegradation of cationic surfactants
 
Biodegradability of surfactants.
 
1995
 
London
 
Blackie Academic and Professional
 
183
 
203

16.

Hundal
RS
,
Inzucchi
SE
Metformin: new understandings, new uses
 
Drugs
 
2003
 
63
 
1879
 
1894
 

17.

Mackrell
JA
,
Walker
JRL
The biodegradation of quaternary ammonium compounds
 
Int Biodet Bull
 
1978
 
14
 
77
 
83

18.

Marchesi
JR
,
Sato
T
,
Weightman
AJ
,
Martin
TA
,
Fry
JC
,
Hiom
SJ
,
Wade
WG
Design and evaluation of useful bacterium-specific PCR primers that amplify genes coding for bacterial 16S rRNA
 
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
1998
 
64
 
795
 
799

19.

McDonnell
G
,
Russell
AD
Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action and resistance
 
Clin Microbiol Rev
 
1999
 
12
 
147
 
179

20.

Kapich
AN
,
Jensen
KA
,
Hammel
KE
Peroxy radicals are potential agents of lignin biodegradation
 
FEBS Lett
 
1999
 
461
 
115
 
119
 

21.

Pelmont
J
,
Barrelle
M
,
Hauteville
M
,
Gamba
D
,
Romdhane
M
,
Dardas
A
,
Beguin
C
A new bacterial dehydrogenase oxidizing the lignin model compound guaiacylglycerol beta-O-4-guaiacyl ether
 
FEMS Microbiol Lett
 
1985
 
48
 
109
 
113

22.

Powers
EM
Efficiency of the RYU non-staining KOH technique for rapidly determining Gram reactions of food-borne and waterborne bacteria and yeasts
 
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
1995
 
61
 
3756
 
3758

23.

Prescott
LM
,
Jones
ME
Modified methods for the determination of carbamyl aspartate
 
Anal Biochem
 
1969
 
32
 
408
 
419
 

24.

Rose FL, Swain G (1954) Polymeric diguanidines. UK Patent 702,268

25.

Rose
FL
,
Swain
G
Bisdiguanidines having antimicrobial activity
 
J Chem Soc
 
1956
 
IV
 
4422
 
4425
 

26.

Rosenberg
H
,
Ennor
AH
,
Morrison
JF
The estimation of arginine
 
Biochem J
 
1956
 
63
 
153
 
159

27.

Shoeb
SM
,
Hirota
M
,
Shimizu
E
,
Yorifuji
T
Diguanidinobutane (arcaine) degradation in Rhodococcus sp. C-x
 
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem
 
1994
 
58
 
859
 
863
 

28.

Stacklebrandt
E
,
Goebel
BM
Taxonomic note: a place for DNA–DNA re-association and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology
 
Int J Syst Bacteriol
 
1994
 
44
 
846
 
849
 

29.

Tricot
C
,
Piérard
A
,
Stalon
V
Comparative studies on the degradation of guanidino and ureido compounds by Pseudomonas
 
J Gen Microbiol
 
1990
 
136
 
2307
 
2317

30.

White
GF
Morpeth
FF
Biodegradation of surfactants
 
Preservation of surfactant formulations
 
1995
 
Glasgow
 
Blackie Academic and Professional
 
83
 
117

31.

Yorifuji
T
,
Kaneoke
M
,
Shimizu
E
,
Shiota
K
,
Matsuo
R
Degradation of α,ω-diguanidinoalkanes and a novel enzyme, diguanidinobutane amidinohydrolase in Pseudomonas putida
 
Agric Biol Chem
 
1989
 
53
 
3003
 
3009

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)