Abstract

Pentachlorophenol (PCP) and its sodium salt (Na-PCP) are extremely toxic chemicals responsible for important soil and groundwater pollution, mainly caused by wastes from wood-treatment plants, because chlorinated phenols are widely used as wood preservatives. The methods most commonly used for routine analysis of pesticides such as PCP and Na-PCP are high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (GC–MS). A variety of rapid biological screening tests using marine organisms, bioluminescent bacteria, and enzymes have also been reported. In this study, rapid biological screening analysis using Bacillus subtilis was developed, to assess the biodegradation of PCP and its by-products in liquid samples. An empirical model is proposed for spectrophotometric analysis of Na-PCP concentration after growth of Bacillus subtilis.

Introduction

Substantial amounts of chlorinated aromatic compounds, including chlorophenols, have been discharged into the environment [1]. Chlorination of phenol greatly increases the toxicity of the resulting molecules relative to phenol, consequently pentachlorophenol (PCP and Na-PCP) is by far the most studied because of its high toxicity. PCP and Na-PCP are extremely toxic chemicals responsible for important soil and groundwater pollution, principally from wood-treatment plants, because chlorinated phenols are widely used as wood preservatives. At least, 32 photolytic or biodegradation products of PCP and Na-PCP have been identified, including: octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, tetrachlororesorcinol, tetrachloro, trichloro, and dichlorophenols, pentachloro, tetrachloro, trichloro, and dichloroanisoles, and tetrachlorohydroquinone [2]. Many of these constituents are potentially toxic, mutagenic, or teratogenic [3].

The most commonly employed methods for routine analysis of pesticides such as PCP and Na-PCP are high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (GC–MS). These methods enable reliable analysis of compounds at the trace level but require sophisticated and expensive equipment. The most promising alternatives in environmental toxicology include the use of biomolecules and organisms with limited sensitivity, for example enzymes, bacteria, fungi, and algae [4]. For example, in toxicity assays (Microtox (Azure, Bucks, UK) or ToxAlert (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)), whole organisms are used to measure the toxicity of water and soil samples. These systems are based on use of the luminescent bacteria Vibrio fischeri to measure the toxicity of environmental samples. Furthermore, Escherichia coli has been genetically modified with light-producing genes and, under normal conditions, give out visible light (bioluminescence) [5, 6]. Young et al. [4] investigated the effect of PCP on two isozymes of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and found that detection limits can be significantly reduced by modification of enzyme inhibition assays with a non-optimum cofactor.

Repetto et al. [7] studied the specific effect of PCP using different ecotoxicological model systems, including immobilization of Daphnia magna, bioluminiscence inhibition in the bacterium Vibrio fischeri, growth inhibition of the alga Chlorella vulgaris, and micronuclei induction in the plant Allium cepa. PCP was very toxic to all biota and cells; micronuclei induction in Allium cepa was the most sensitive.

The evolution of toxicity and biodegradability of liquid streams from oxidation treatments should be evaluated, in order to effectively assess the impact of discharge of xenobiotics on the biota of the receiving water bodies. In this sense, bioassays provide an alternative because they constitute a measurement of environmentally relevant toxicity. In this study, a method for rapid biological screening analysis was developed to assess the biodegradation of Na-PCP, and the presence of toxic by-products in liquid samples. An empirical model is proposed for simple spectrophotometric (A  600) estimation of Na-PCP concentration after growth of Bacillus subtilis.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and reagents

Pentachlorophenol (99% pure) was obtained from Sigma Chemical (St Louis, MO, USA). The salt sodium pentachlorophenate (Na-PCP) was used in all assays. All chemicals used were of the highest purity available commercially.

PCP mineralization

Mixed culture [8] able to degrade Na-PCP, was inoculated in mineral salts (MS) solution (in grams per litre: NaNO3 2.25, K2HPO4 2.83, KH2PO4 0.507, MgSO4.7 H2O 0.45, FeSO4 0.135, and CaCl2 0.45) plus Na-PCP as the only source of carbon and energy (NaPCP–MS medium). Details on culture conditions and media are given in Murialdo et al. [8]. Acclimated cells in NaPCP–MS liquid medium containing 25–500 mg/l Na-PCP were used as the inoculum for all Na-PCP degradation and toxicity experiments. Batch culture experiments were carried out in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks filled with 50 ml NaPCP–MS medium, and attached to a shaker (120 rpm) at 25°C.

Liquid samples were periodically withdrawn and filter-sterilized (pore size 0.22 µm) for further analysis. Na-PCP content was determined with a Shimadzu UV–visible spectrophotometer by comparison with a standard curve (Na-PCPAbs320 = 1 corresponds to 50 mg/l). The flasks were kept at 25°C in the dark to avoid photo-decomposition of Na-PCP. In each experiment a flask with no inoculum was run as control for Na-PCP volatilisation [9].

Toxicity bioassays

A suspension of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051 sensitive to the bactericidal action of PCP and many of its metabolites [10] was used. Samples taken periodically from batch Na-PCP-biodegradation experiments were filter-sterilized (pore size 0.22 µm). Different dilutions, in the range 1/2 to 1/128, were made in tryptone broth (TB), and these were then inoculated with B. subtilis (10% v/v) previously grown in TB overnight. After incubation times of 48 h at 120 rpm and 25°C, the growth of B. subtilis was assessed by A  600. The results were compared with the output of B. subtilis ATCC 6051 exposed to different dilutions of Na-PCP in TB. The concentrations of Na-PCP were determined by HPLC (Shimadzu LC-10AD). Parallel to this assay, the last sample depleted of Na-PCP was also analyzed by HPLC in order to confirm the disappearance of Na-PCP and its by-products.

Additional experiments were performed to quantify and correlate the bacterial growth with A  600. Bacteria were grown in an Erlenmeyer flask with 0.5 mg dehydrated LB medium powder per millilitre at 25°C. After 24 h of incubation the cells were collected at 14,000 rpm. The cells were re-suspended in 2 ml phosphate buffer. Serial dilutions were made and A  600 was determined using a Shimadzu UV–visible spectrophotometer. Each dilution was surface plated on 0.5 g dehydrated LB medium, and 1.5 g of agar per 100 ml. The plates were incubated at 25°C, and the colonies were counted after 48 h and expressed as colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml). Dry weight was determined by weighing the cells after drying in an oven at 105°C for 24 h. Figure 1 shows the correlation of CFU/ml and dry weight as a function of A  600.
Fig. 1

Colony-forming units per millilitre (filled diamonds) and dry weight (open diamonds) as a function of A  600 for B. subtilis growth

Statistical analysis

All yield measurements were performed three times in duplicate. Statistically significant differences between A  600 measurements were evaluated by use of Excel software. The significance levels are quoted at the 95% confidence level (P ≤ 0.05).

Results and discussion

Estimation of Na-PCP using B. subtilis as a bioindicator

Control assay

Na-PCP toxicity to Bacillus subtilis was investigated using a known concentration of Na-PCP in a control assay. Results are presented in Fig. 2. Cell growth was apparent when the absorbance at 600 nm was greater than 0.1. Thus, B. subtilis was not able to grow when Na-PCP concentration was above 1.5 mg/l, and maximum growth was achieved without Na-PCP.
Fig. 2

Control assay: filled diamonds, experimental data; solid line, genfit fitting; dashed line, A  600 = 0.1 (the dashed line represents the value above which the growth of B. subtilis can be observed spectrophotometrically)

The dependence on Na-PCP concentration of B. subtilis growth for Na-PCP concentrations below 1.5 mg/l was investigated thoroughly. Data were correlated using the nonlinear regression package MathCad (genfit function) as:
$$ {\text{PCP}}\,({\text{mg}}/{\text{l}}) = \frac{0.4036}{{{\text{A}}_{600} }} - 0.3321 $$
1

This method is suitable for predicting responses for A  600 > 0.1. The maximum growth of B. subtilis during 48 h of incubation corresponds to an absorbance (A  600) of approximately 1. Figure 2 shows that fitting is more accurate for A  600 > 0.2, which is for Na-PCP content below 1 mg/l. Therefore, monitoring the growth of B. subtilis by use of A  600 enables estimation of Na-PCP concentration.

Na-PCP mineralisation: toxicity screening

Na-PCP mineralisation experiments, using mixed culture [8], were performed in a batch reactor. Samples were periodically withdrawn and centrifuged. Na-PCP concentration was determined by A  320. Then, samples were filter sterilized (pore size 0.22 µm) and diluted (1/32) in TB before inoculating B. Subtilis in order to analyze the dependence of the growth of B. subtilis in media previously treated with mixed culture. Results are presented in Fig. 3. These outcomes effectively demonstrate that the media, after being treated with mixed culture, does not contain intermediate products toxic to B. subtilis. This was also confirmed by parallel HPLC assays (data not shown).
Fig. 3

Effect of residual PCP concentration on B. subtilis growth in culture media (with PCP-SM) where mixed culture has previously been grown: filled diamonds, Na-PCP (m/l); open squares, A  600

For the first samples taken from the batch reactor (0 and 6.33 h), 1/32 dilution is not enough to allow B. subtilis growth (Fig. 3), because Na-PCP concentration is greater than 1.5 mg/l. Consequently, in the whole set of samples, different dilutions in TB from 1/2 to 1/128 were made for all the samples taken in biodegradation experiments. Each dilution was then inoculated with a B. subtilis suspension of known concentration. This procedure is useful to determine in which range the dilution should be made to enable B. subtilis growth. Na-PCP concentration was determined by A  320. Results for a typical experiment are shown in Table 1. When A  600 ≫ 0.1 after 48 h of incubation at 25°C, Na-PCP concentration was estimated using Eq. (1). Thus, the estimated Na-PCP concentration in the original sample was obtained. For the whole testing dataset, the mean relative error was 17.3%.

Results for a typical PCP biodegradation experiment

Time (h)PCP in original sample (mg/l)aSample dilutionPCP in diluted sample (mg/l)aA  600 (diluted sample)bEstimated PCP in diluted sample (Eq. 1) (mg/l)Estimated PCP in original sample (mg/l)
01101/1280.860.37040.7696.9
6711/641.110.35850.7950.8
7.343.51/321.360.2151.5449.4
13.5111/81.370.20951.5912.7
Time (h)PCP in original sample (mg/l)aSample dilutionPCP in diluted sample (mg/l)aA  600 (diluted sample)bEstimated PCP in diluted sample (Eq. 1) (mg/l)Estimated PCP in original sample (mg/l)
01101/1280.860.37040.7696.9
6711/641.110.35850.7950.8
7.343.51/321.360.2151.5449.4
13.5111/81.370.20951.5912.7

PCP estimation using B. subtilis

aMeasured by A  320

bMeasured after 48 h of incubation

Results for a typical PCP biodegradation experiment

Time (h)PCP in original sample (mg/l)aSample dilutionPCP in diluted sample (mg/l)aA  600 (diluted sample)bEstimated PCP in diluted sample (Eq. 1) (mg/l)Estimated PCP in original sample (mg/l)
01101/1280.860.37040.7696.9
6711/641.110.35850.7950.8
7.343.51/321.360.2151.5449.4
13.5111/81.370.20951.5912.7
Time (h)PCP in original sample (mg/l)aSample dilutionPCP in diluted sample (mg/l)aA  600 (diluted sample)bEstimated PCP in diluted sample (Eq. 1) (mg/l)Estimated PCP in original sample (mg/l)
01101/1280.860.37040.7696.9
6711/641.110.35850.7950.8
7.343.51/321.360.2151.5449.4
13.5111/81.370.20951.5912.7

PCP estimation using B. subtilis

aMeasured by A  320

bMeasured after 48 h of incubation

Conclusions

The toxicity of chlorophenols varies between different congeners and bacteria. In our results we found that the minimum concentration of Na-PCP, which completely inhibited growth of B. subtilis ATCC 6051, was above 1.5 mg/l. It is clear that B. subtilis is sensitive, specific, and useful for detecting low levels of Na-PCP concentration. The bioassay is simple, inexpensive, and fast, and does not require complex sample-preparation procedures or sophisticated analytical instrumentation. An empirical model enables estimation of Na-PCP concentration within 17.3% error. This toxicity test may therefore enable accurate assessment of the efficacy of bioremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater, especially for compounds such as Na-PCP, for which many toxic degradation by-products may exist. Several bacteria degrade PCP and Na-PCP but there are various unknown toxic metabolic intermediates which could be detected by sensitive bacteria such as B. subtilis.

Furthermore, this work contributes an effective tool that can be used in situations in which technology presents temporary constraints. Although this research used a spectrophotometer, it avoids the use of UV light, which is necessary to detect Na-PCP. Moreover, the use of a spectrophotometer can be replaced when using the direct method of microorganism counting (CFU) or dry weight (g/ml).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Claudia Studdert and Dr. Celina Martone for their support, CONICET for assisting with fellowships, SECyT for financial aid, and INTEMA, CONICET, and Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata for facilitating the development of this research.

References

1.

Steinle
P
,
Stucki
G
,
Stettler
R
,
Hanselmann
KW
Aerobic mineralisation of 2,6-dichlorophenol by Ralstonia sp. strain RK1
 
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
1998
 
64
 
2566
 
2571

2.

Middaugh
DP
,
Resnick
SM
,
Lantz
SE
,
Heard
CS
,
Mueller
JG
Toxicological assessment of biodegraded pentachlorophenol: microtox and fish embryos
 
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol
 
1993
 
24
 
165
 
172
 

3.

Lu
PRL
,
Metcalf
E
,
Cole
LK
Rao
KR
The environmental fate of 14C-pentachlorophenol in laboratory model ecosystems
 
Pentachlorophenol: chemistry, pharmacology, and environmental toxicology
 
1977
 
New York
 
Plenum
 
53
 
63

4.

Young
J
,
Dowman
AA
,
Cowell
DC
The detection of pentachlorophenol by its inhibitory effectiveness on lactate dehydrogenase of rabbit muscle and Bovine Heart
 
J Pest Biochem Physiol
 
1999
 
64
 
1
 
8
 

5.

Redshaw
N
,
Dickson
SJ
,
Ambrose
V
,
Horswell
J
A preliminary investigation into the use of biosensors to screen stomach contents for selected poisons and drugs
 
Forensic Sci Int
 
2007
 
172
 
106
 
111
 

6.

Rattray
EAS
,
Prosser
JI
,
Killham
K
,
Glover
LA
Luminescence-based nonextractive technique for in situ detection of Escherichia coli in soil
 
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
1990
 
56
 
3368
 
3374

7.

Repetto
G
,
Jos
A
,
Hazen
MJ
,
Molero
ML
,
del Peso
A
,
Salguero
M
,
del Castillo
P
,
Rodriguez-Vicente
MC
,
Repetto
M
A test battery for the ecotoxicological evaluation of Pentachlorophenol
 
Toxicol In Vitro
 
2001
 
15
 
503
 
509
 

8.

Murialdo
SE
,
Fenoglio
R
,
Haure
PM
,
Gonzalez
JF
Degradation of phenol and chlorophenols by mixed and pure cultures
 
Water SA
 
2003
 
29
 
457
 
463

9.

Radehaus
RM
,
Schmidt
SK
Characterization of a novel Pseudomonas sp. that mineralizes high concentrations of pentachlorophenol
 
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
1992
 
58
 
2879
 
2885

10.

Ruckdeschel
G
,
Renner
G
,
Schwarz
K
Effects of pentachlorophenol and some of its known and possible metabolites on different species of bacteria
 
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
1987
 
53
 
11
 
2689
 
2692

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)