-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
M A Ayude, E Okada, J F González, P M Haure, S E Murialdo, Bacillus subtilis as a bioindicator for estimating pentachlorophenol toxicity and concentration, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, Volume 36, Issue 5, 1 May 2009, Pages 765–768, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-009-0550-y
Close - Share Icon Share
Abstract
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) and its sodium salt (Na-PCP) are extremely toxic chemicals responsible for important soil and groundwater pollution, mainly caused by wastes from wood-treatment plants, because chlorinated phenols are widely used as wood preservatives. The methods most commonly used for routine analysis of pesticides such as PCP and Na-PCP are high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (GC–MS). A variety of rapid biological screening tests using marine organisms, bioluminescent bacteria, and enzymes have also been reported. In this study, rapid biological screening analysis using Bacillus subtilis was developed, to assess the biodegradation of PCP and its by-products in liquid samples. An empirical model is proposed for spectrophotometric analysis of Na-PCP concentration after growth of Bacillus subtilis.
Introduction
Substantial amounts of chlorinated aromatic compounds, including chlorophenols, have been discharged into the environment [1]. Chlorination of phenol greatly increases the toxicity of the resulting molecules relative to phenol, consequently pentachlorophenol (PCP and Na-PCP) is by far the most studied because of its high toxicity. PCP and Na-PCP are extremely toxic chemicals responsible for important soil and groundwater pollution, principally from wood-treatment plants, because chlorinated phenols are widely used as wood preservatives. At least, 32 photolytic or biodegradation products of PCP and Na-PCP have been identified, including: octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, tetrachlororesorcinol, tetrachloro, trichloro, and dichlorophenols, pentachloro, tetrachloro, trichloro, and dichloroanisoles, and tetrachlorohydroquinone [2]. Many of these constituents are potentially toxic, mutagenic, or teratogenic [3].
The most commonly employed methods for routine analysis of pesticides such as PCP and Na-PCP are high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (GC–MS). These methods enable reliable analysis of compounds at the trace level but require sophisticated and expensive equipment. The most promising alternatives in environmental toxicology include the use of biomolecules and organisms with limited sensitivity, for example enzymes, bacteria, fungi, and algae [4]. For example, in toxicity assays (Microtox (Azure, Bucks, UK) or ToxAlert (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)), whole organisms are used to measure the toxicity of water and soil samples. These systems are based on use of the luminescent bacteria Vibrio fischeri to measure the toxicity of environmental samples. Furthermore, Escherichia coli has been genetically modified with light-producing genes and, under normal conditions, give out visible light (bioluminescence) [5, 6]. Young et al. [4] investigated the effect of PCP on two isozymes of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and found that detection limits can be significantly reduced by modification of enzyme inhibition assays with a non-optimum cofactor.
Repetto et al. [7] studied the specific effect of PCP using different ecotoxicological model systems, including immobilization of Daphnia magna, bioluminiscence inhibition in the bacterium Vibrio fischeri, growth inhibition of the alga Chlorella vulgaris, and micronuclei induction in the plant Allium cepa. PCP was very toxic to all biota and cells; micronuclei induction in Allium cepa was the most sensitive.
The evolution of toxicity and biodegradability of liquid streams from oxidation treatments should be evaluated, in order to effectively assess the impact of discharge of xenobiotics on the biota of the receiving water bodies. In this sense, bioassays provide an alternative because they constitute a measurement of environmentally relevant toxicity. In this study, a method for rapid biological screening analysis was developed to assess the biodegradation of Na-PCP, and the presence of toxic by-products in liquid samples. An empirical model is proposed for simple spectrophotometric (A 600) estimation of Na-PCP concentration after growth of Bacillus subtilis.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
Pentachlorophenol (99% pure) was obtained from Sigma Chemical (St Louis, MO, USA). The salt sodium pentachlorophenate (Na-PCP) was used in all assays. All chemicals used were of the highest purity available commercially.
PCP mineralization
Mixed culture [8] able to degrade Na-PCP, was inoculated in mineral salts (MS) solution (in grams per litre: NaNO3 2.25, K2HPO4 2.83, KH2PO4 0.507, MgSO4.7 H2O 0.45, FeSO4 0.135, and CaCl2 0.45) plus Na-PCP as the only source of carbon and energy (NaPCP–MS medium). Details on culture conditions and media are given in Murialdo et al. [8]. Acclimated cells in NaPCP–MS liquid medium containing 25–500 mg/l Na-PCP were used as the inoculum for all Na-PCP degradation and toxicity experiments. Batch culture experiments were carried out in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks filled with 50 ml NaPCP–MS medium, and attached to a shaker (120 rpm) at 25°C.
Liquid samples were periodically withdrawn and filter-sterilized (pore size 0.22 µm) for further analysis. Na-PCP content was determined with a Shimadzu UV–visible spectrophotometer by comparison with a standard curve (Na-PCPAbs320 = 1 corresponds to 50 mg/l). The flasks were kept at 25°C in the dark to avoid photo-decomposition of Na-PCP. In each experiment a flask with no inoculum was run as control for Na-PCP volatilisation [9].
Toxicity bioassays
A suspension of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051 sensitive to the bactericidal action of PCP and many of its metabolites [10] was used. Samples taken periodically from batch Na-PCP-biodegradation experiments were filter-sterilized (pore size 0.22 µm). Different dilutions, in the range 1/2 to 1/128, were made in tryptone broth (TB), and these were then inoculated with B. subtilis (10% v/v) previously grown in TB overnight. After incubation times of 48 h at 120 rpm and 25°C, the growth of B. subtilis was assessed by A 600. The results were compared with the output of B. subtilis ATCC 6051 exposed to different dilutions of Na-PCP in TB. The concentrations of Na-PCP were determined by HPLC (Shimadzu LC-10AD). Parallel to this assay, the last sample depleted of Na-PCP was also analyzed by HPLC in order to confirm the disappearance of Na-PCP and its by-products.
Colony-forming units per millilitre (filled diamonds) and dry weight (open diamonds) as a function of A 600 for B. subtilis growth
Statistical analysis
All yield measurements were performed three times in duplicate. Statistically significant differences between A 600 measurements were evaluated by use of Excel software. The significance levels are quoted at the 95% confidence level (P ≤ 0.05).
Results and discussion
Estimation of Na-PCP using B. subtilis as a bioindicator
Control assay
Control assay: filled diamonds, experimental data; solid line, genfit fitting; dashed line, A 600 = 0.1 (the dashed line represents the value above which the growth of B. subtilis can be observed spectrophotometrically)
This method is suitable for predicting responses for A 600 > 0.1. The maximum growth of B. subtilis during 48 h of incubation corresponds to an absorbance (A 600) of approximately 1. Figure 2 shows that fitting is more accurate for A 600 > 0.2, which is for Na-PCP content below 1 mg/l. Therefore, monitoring the growth of B. subtilis by use of A 600 enables estimation of Na-PCP concentration.
Na-PCP mineralisation: toxicity screening
Effect of residual PCP concentration on B. subtilis growth in culture media (with PCP-SM) where mixed culture has previously been grown: filled diamonds, Na-PCP (m/l); open squares, A 600
For the first samples taken from the batch reactor (0 and 6.33 h), 1/32 dilution is not enough to allow B. subtilis growth (Fig. 3), because Na-PCP concentration is greater than 1.5 mg/l. Consequently, in the whole set of samples, different dilutions in TB from 1/2 to 1/128 were made for all the samples taken in biodegradation experiments. Each dilution was then inoculated with a B. subtilis suspension of known concentration. This procedure is useful to determine in which range the dilution should be made to enable B. subtilis growth. Na-PCP concentration was determined by A 320. Results for a typical experiment are shown in Table 1. When A 600 ≫ 0.1 after 48 h of incubation at 25°C, Na-PCP concentration was estimated using Eq. (1). Thus, the estimated Na-PCP concentration in the original sample was obtained. For the whole testing dataset, the mean relative error was 17.3%.
Results for a typical PCP biodegradation experiment
| Time (h) . | PCP in original sample (mg/l)a . | Sample dilution . | PCP in diluted sample (mg/l)a . | A 600 (diluted sample)b . | Estimated PCP in diluted sample (Eq. 1) (mg/l) . | Estimated PCP in original sample (mg/l) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 110 | 1/128 | 0.86 | 0.3704 | 0.76 | 96.9 |
| 6 | 71 | 1/64 | 1.11 | 0.3585 | 0.79 | 50.8 |
| 7.3 | 43.5 | 1/32 | 1.36 | 0.215 | 1.54 | 49.4 |
| 13.5 | 11 | 1/8 | 1.37 | 0.2095 | 1.59 | 12.7 |
| Time (h) . | PCP in original sample (mg/l)a . | Sample dilution . | PCP in diluted sample (mg/l)a . | A 600 (diluted sample)b . | Estimated PCP in diluted sample (Eq. 1) (mg/l) . | Estimated PCP in original sample (mg/l) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 110 | 1/128 | 0.86 | 0.3704 | 0.76 | 96.9 |
| 6 | 71 | 1/64 | 1.11 | 0.3585 | 0.79 | 50.8 |
| 7.3 | 43.5 | 1/32 | 1.36 | 0.215 | 1.54 | 49.4 |
| 13.5 | 11 | 1/8 | 1.37 | 0.2095 | 1.59 | 12.7 |
PCP estimation using B. subtilis
aMeasured by A 320
bMeasured after 48 h of incubation
Results for a typical PCP biodegradation experiment
| Time (h) . | PCP in original sample (mg/l)a . | Sample dilution . | PCP in diluted sample (mg/l)a . | A 600 (diluted sample)b . | Estimated PCP in diluted sample (Eq. 1) (mg/l) . | Estimated PCP in original sample (mg/l) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 110 | 1/128 | 0.86 | 0.3704 | 0.76 | 96.9 |
| 6 | 71 | 1/64 | 1.11 | 0.3585 | 0.79 | 50.8 |
| 7.3 | 43.5 | 1/32 | 1.36 | 0.215 | 1.54 | 49.4 |
| 13.5 | 11 | 1/8 | 1.37 | 0.2095 | 1.59 | 12.7 |
| Time (h) . | PCP in original sample (mg/l)a . | Sample dilution . | PCP in diluted sample (mg/l)a . | A 600 (diluted sample)b . | Estimated PCP in diluted sample (Eq. 1) (mg/l) . | Estimated PCP in original sample (mg/l) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 110 | 1/128 | 0.86 | 0.3704 | 0.76 | 96.9 |
| 6 | 71 | 1/64 | 1.11 | 0.3585 | 0.79 | 50.8 |
| 7.3 | 43.5 | 1/32 | 1.36 | 0.215 | 1.54 | 49.4 |
| 13.5 | 11 | 1/8 | 1.37 | 0.2095 | 1.59 | 12.7 |
PCP estimation using B. subtilis
aMeasured by A 320
bMeasured after 48 h of incubation
Conclusions
The toxicity of chlorophenols varies between different congeners and bacteria. In our results we found that the minimum concentration of Na-PCP, which completely inhibited growth of B. subtilis ATCC 6051, was above 1.5 mg/l. It is clear that B. subtilis is sensitive, specific, and useful for detecting low levels of Na-PCP concentration. The bioassay is simple, inexpensive, and fast, and does not require complex sample-preparation procedures or sophisticated analytical instrumentation. An empirical model enables estimation of Na-PCP concentration within 17.3% error. This toxicity test may therefore enable accurate assessment of the efficacy of bioremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater, especially for compounds such as Na-PCP, for which many toxic degradation by-products may exist. Several bacteria degrade PCP and Na-PCP but there are various unknown toxic metabolic intermediates which could be detected by sensitive bacteria such as B. subtilis.
Furthermore, this work contributes an effective tool that can be used in situations in which technology presents temporary constraints. Although this research used a spectrophotometer, it avoids the use of UV light, which is necessary to detect Na-PCP. Moreover, the use of a spectrophotometer can be replaced when using the direct method of microorganism counting (CFU) or dry weight (g/ml).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Claudia Studdert and Dr. Celina Martone for their support, CONICET for assisting with fellowships, SECyT for financial aid, and INTEMA, CONICET, and Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata for facilitating the development of this research.


