-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Xing-Jun Feng, Li-Wei Xing, Di Liu, Xue-Ying Song, Chun-Long Liu, Jing Li, Wen-Shan Xu, Zhong-Qiu Li, Design and high-level expression of a hybrid antimicrobial peptide LF15-CA8 in Escherichia coli, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, Volume 41, Issue 3, 1 March 2014, Pages 527–534, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-013-1382-3
Close - Share Icon Share
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been paid considerable attention owing to their broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and have great potential as novel antimicrobials. In this study, a novel hybrid peptide LF15-CA8 was designed on the basis of bovine lactoferricin (LfcinB) and cecropin A. The gene segment encoding LF15-CA8 was synthesized and cloned into pGEX-4T-BH to form pGEX-4T-LC1 containing one copy of the LF15-CA8 coding region. A series of recombinant vectors containing up to six multiple-copy LF15-CA8 coding regions, i.e., pGEX-4T-LCn (n = 1–6), were subsequently constructed, and used for transformation in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3). After induction with IPTG, pGEX-4T-LC1 and pGEX-4T-LC2 transformants successfully expressed fusion proteins GST-LF15-CA8 and GST-(LF15-CA8)2 in the form of inclusion bodies, respectively. The inclusion bodies were dissolved and the peptide was successfully released in 70 % formic acid in a single step. After purification, about 10.0 mg of the recombinant peptide LF15-CA8 with purity more than 97 % was obtained from 1 l of bacteria culture of pGEX-4T-LC2 transformants. LF15-CA8 caused an increase in antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacterium (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923) compared with the parent peptides and did not show obvious hemolytic activity against human erythrocytes in the range of effective antibacterial concentration. These results suggest that the peptide LF15-CA8 could be a promising candidate for therapeutic applications, and may lead to a cost-effective solution for the large-scale production of AMPs.
Introduction
The effectiveness of antibiotics in controlling infectious bacterial disease and their increased availability due to successful mass production have led to widespread and often inappropriate use. As a result, multidrug antibiotic resistance of pathogenic microorganisms is an increasingly serious public health problem worldwide. There is a significant and urgent need for the development of novel classes of antimicrobial agents that could be used against antibiotic-resistant microbes [30]. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are naturally occurring components of innate immunity and are found in virtually all organisms. They exhibit a diverse range of biological effects and have a similar efficiency against strains resistant and susceptible to antibiotics [35]. Most AMPs have nonspecific membrane-lytic activities, which are much more difficult for bacteria to develop resistance to than to conventional antibiotics [10]. AMPs have recently generated considerable interest as excellent novel therapeutic agents [5, 33].
Among AMPs, bovine lactoferricin (LfcinB) is a cationic AMP and is obtained by acid-pepsin hydrolysis of bovine lactoferrin. LfcinB consists of 25 amino acid residues with a molecular weight of 3,124 Da [3]. The peptide possesses broad spectrum antimicrobial activity against various bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa. LfcinB has also been found to induce apoptosis of cancer cells [21] and exert immunoregulatory effects [9].
Cecropins are a family of potent AMPs originally isolated from the hemolymph of the giant silk moth Hyalophora cecropia [11]. They are synthesized in the fat bodies as a preproprotein and consist of 31–39 amino acid residues. Like other polycationic peptides, cecropins possess a broad antimicrobial spectrum. At low concentrations (0.1–5 μM range), cecropins exhibit lytic antibacterial activity against several Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, but not against eukaryotic cells [24].
In recent years, many efforts have been focused on developing novel AMPs with more potent activity. Researchers have done this by altering the original sequences of AMPs via several strategies, including substitution at one or more positions, truncation, and deletion. Such strategies permit the determination of those residues or domains that are important in modulating activity and can result in analogues with more potent activity than the parental peptides [13, 26]. Hybridization of two peptides with different properties is one especially effective method to obtain novel AMPs, because hybrid peptides ideally possess a more desirable combination of various parameters than their parental peptides. Several hybrid segments of cecropin A combined with segments of melittin [1, 6, 8] and magainin [18, 36] have demonstrated broader antimicrobial spectra than the parental peptide cecropin A without introducing the hemolytic activity of melittin or magainin. The broad spectrum and high antimicrobial activity suggest that these hybrid peptides may have great application potential as novel therapeutic agents. However, for the pharmaceutical realization and commercial viability of AMPs applications, one of the great obstacles is the large-scale preparation and production of active AMPs.
In the present study, a novel hybrid peptide LF15-CA8 was designed. The peptide incorporates 1–15 amino acid residues of LfcinB, in which Met at the position 10 is substituted with Trp, and 1–8 amino acid residues of cecropin A. The soft peptide (–GSG–) for linkage was introduced between them. A highly efficient protocol for bacterial expression of LF15-CA8 was provided, and the antibacterial and hemolytic activities of the peptide were determined, which should lay a good foundation for developing LF15-CA8 as a therapeutic agent.
Materials and methods
Strains, vectors, and reagents
Escherichia coli DH5α for plasmid amplification, E. coli BL21 (DE3) for the expression of fusion protein, and the plasmid pGEX-4T-2 for producing fusion protein with GST were generously provided by Dr. Jianhua Wang from Feed Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Restriction enzymes, T4 DNA ligase, and Taq DNA polymerase were purchased from TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Dalian, China). All oligonucleotides were ordered from Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). LfcinB, cecropin A, and LF15-CA8 were purchased from GL Biochem Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and they were synthesized by the solid-phase method with a purity of more than 98 %. All other chemical reagents were made in China and were of analytical grade.
Construction of expression vectors containing oligomeric peptides encoding sequence
A DNA fragment containing the monomeric LF15-CA8 encoding sequence was constructed using two complementary deoxyoligonucleotides (oligos) A (forward): 5′-GAATTCGGATCC GACCCGTTCAAATGCCGTCGTTGGCAGTGGCGATTGAAAAAGCTGGGTGCTGGCTCTGGCAAATGGAAGCTGTTCAAGAAAATCGACCCG AGATCTAAGCTT-3′ and B (reverse): 5′-AAGCTTAGATCTCGGGTCGATTTTCTTGAACAGCTTCCATTTGCCAGAGCCAGCACCCAGCTTTTTCAATCGCCACTGCCAACGACGGCATTTGAACGGGTCGGATCCGAATTC-3′ (restriction sites EcoRI (GAATTC), BamHI (GGATCC), BglII (AGATCT), and HindIII (AAGCTT) are indicated in the oligos in italics). The Asp-Pro coding sequence GACCCG was introduced (and is highlighted in bold in the oligos). Asp-Pro moieties were added to facilitate the formation of the monomer by formic acid cleavage. Because the multiple cloning sites of pGEX-4T-2 contain the site of BamHI and are not suitable for the construction of expression vectors containing multimeric genes, a DNA sequence (AGATCT GAATTC AAGCTT GCG GCC GCA) digested with BglII and NotI was connected with pGEX-4T-2 digested with BamHI and NotI, which resulted in the plasmid pGEX-4T-BH. The two synthesized complementary oligos were annealed and ligated into the vector pGEX-4T-BH between EcoRI and HindIII sites, generating pGEX-4T-LC1. The resultant plasmid was used for transformation in E. coli DH5α and positive transformants were screened by colony PCR using primers P1 (5′-GGGCTGGCAAGCCACGTTTGGTG-3′) and P2 (5′-CCGGGAGCTGCATGTGTCAGAGG-3′) and further verified by sequencing. The peptide monomer DNA fragment of pGEX-4T-LC1 was isolated after digestion with EcoRI and BglII and cloned into the pGEX-4T-LC1 digested with EcoRI and BamHI, producing pGEX-4T-LC2 carrying a dimer of the LF15-CA8 encoding sequence. These steps were repeated for construction of tandem multimers of the LF15-CA8 encoding sequence, generating pGEX-4T-LCn (n = number of LF15-CA8 coding regions, 1–6).
Induced expression of LF15-CA8 oligomeric fusion gene
Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells were transformed with the recombinant expression vectors pGEX-4T-LCn, and desired clones were selected. Each transformant harboring pGEX-4T-LCn was inoculated into LB medium supplemented with ampicillin (50 μg/ml) and grown at 37 °C overnight. Each culture was then diluted 1:100 into 50 ml of fresh medium and grown at 37 °C. At OD600 = 0.6, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 0.3 mM for the induced expression of the GST fusion protein. The cells were cultured for 4 h and harvested by centrifugation at 4,000×g for 10 min. The cell pellet was washed twice with 30 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer (20 mM of Tris–HCl, 500 mM of NaCl, and 5 mM of EDTA, pH 8.0) and resuspended in 3 ml of this buffer. Cell preparations were then sonicated (20 × 3 s with 3 s on ice between each cycle) at maximum amplitude using the ultrasonic amplitude transformer Φ6 (SCIENZ-IID, Ningbo, China). Insoluble and soluble fractions were separated by centrifugation at 12,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C. 15 % SDS-PAGE was performed to monitor the expression of the recombinant LF15-CA8 [27].
Production and cleavage of inclusion bodies
Escherichia coli cells harboring the expression vectors pGEX-4T-LC1 and pGEX-4T-LC 2 were separately cultured in 1 l of LB medium. After induction by IPTG and lysis of cells by sonication as described above, the inclusion bodies fraction containing the fusion protein of interest was recovered by centrifugation at 12,000×g for 30 min at 4 °C and washed with 10 ml of PBS (20 mM of Tris–HCl, 50 mM of NaCl, 1 mM of EDTA, 0.5 % Triton X-100, pH 8.0). After washing twice with 50 ml of urea (2 M) and 50 ml of PBS, respectively, the inclusion bodies were resuspended in 50 ml of the 70 % formic acid solution and digested for 2 h at 30 °C with shaking. The reaction mixture was lyophilized and analyzed by 15 % Tricine-SDS-PAGE [28].
Purification of the recombinant peptide
The lyophilized digested product was resuspended in 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). After centrifugation at 10,000×g for 10 min, the peptide in the clear supernatant was purified by semi-preparative reversed-phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) on a C18 column (250, 4.6 mm, 5 μm, 300 Å), which was pre-equilibrated in 0.1 % TFA. The bound proteins were eluted with a linear gradient of acetonitrile (20–45 %, v/v) (at 1.5 % per min) in 0.1 % TFA. The flow rate was 1.0 ml/min and the absorbance of the eluent was monitored at 214 nm. Purification was monitored by 15 % Tricine-SDS-PAGE. The purified peptide was lyophilized and stored at −20 °C until needed. The peptide yield was determined as described by Bradford [4]. The molecular weight was determined by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) on an LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo, USA). The ionization voltage was approximately 2.0 kV and the capillary temperature was set to 200 °C. Helium (5.0 purity) and nitrogen were utilized as a damping gas in the linear ion trap and in the curved linear trap, respectively.
Determination of antibacterial activities
Antibacterial activities of LfcinB, cecropin A, and the recombinant peptide LF15-CA8 against different microorganisms were tested using the microbroth dilution method [7]. The stock solutions of three peptides were serially diluted tenfold with 0.01 % acetic acid and 0.2 % bovine serum albumin. The tested bacteria growing in the log phase were diluted to 2 × 105–7 × 105 CFU/ml with MHB medium. Aliquots (100 μl) from each strain suspension were distributed into a 96-well polypropylene microtiter plate, and to each well was added 11 μl of each peptide dilution. Cultures were grown for 18 h with vigorous shaking. The absorbance was evaluated at 600 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, USA). Experiments were performed in triplicate. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration of peptide that would fully inhibit bacterial growth as measured by optical density.
Hemolytic activity assay
The hemolytic activities of LF15-CA8, LfcinB, and cecropin A were determined using human red blood cells (HRBC) as described by Maher and McClean [22]. The fresh erythrocytes were prepared and suspended in PBS to a concentration of 4 % (v/v). Peptides were added and the resulting suspension was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 414 nm with an ELISA plate reader. Controls for zero hemolysis (blank) and 100 % hemolysis consisted of HRBC suspended in PBS and 1 % Triton X-100, respectively.
Results
Construction of the expression vectors
Construction of the recombinant expression plasmids pGEX-4T-LCn (n = 1–6). Lane 1 DNA marker, lanes 2–7 PCR products of plasmids of pGEX-4T-LCn (n = 1–6), respectively
Induced expression of fusion proteins
SDS-PAGE analysis of expression of E. coli BL21 (DE3) transformed with different recombinant plasmids. Lane 1 protein molecular weight marker, lanes 2–8 induced expression of E. coli BL21(DE3) transformed with pGEX-4T-2, pGEX-4T-LCn (n = 1–6), respectively
Production and digestion of inclusion bodies
Production of the inclusion bodies of fusion proteins. Lane 1 protein molecular weight marker, lanes 2 and 3 the inclusion bodies of GST-LF15-CA8 and GST-(LF15-CA8)2 washed with 2 M of urea, respectively
Tricine-SDS-PAGE analysis of the fusion proteins cleaved by formic acid and the purified recombinant LF15-CA8. Lanes 1 and 2 GST-LF15-CA8 and GST-(LF15-CA8)2 cleaved by formic acid, respectively, lane 3 protein molecular weight marker, lanes 4 and 5 the purified recombinant peptide LF15-CA8 from GST-LF15-CA8 and GST-(LF15-CA8)2, respectively
Purification of the recombinant peptide
Molecular weight determination of the recombinant peptide LF15-CA8 by ESI–MS
Antibacterial activity of the peptide
Antibacterial activity assay was performed to determine the function of the recombinant LF15-CA8. The peptide MICs for several microorganisms are shown in Table 1. The peptide exhibited obvious activity against both Gram-positive bacterium (S. aureus ATCC 25923) and Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli O78, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Salmonella pullorum CCVC 533). The MIC values of LF15-CA8 for the tested bacteria were lower than those of LfcinB, which showed that LF15-CA8 had much better antibacterial activity than LfcinB. The MICs of LF15-CA8 against E. coli O78 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were higher than those of cecropin A, and the two peptides had similar activity against S. pullorum CCVC 533. However, cecropin A exhibited a lower or no effect on S. aureus ATCC 25923 (MIC > 256 mg/l), and LF15-CA8 exhibited a significantly improved activity against S. aureus ATCC 25923 (32 mg/l) as shown in Table 1. These results demonstrated that the LF15-CA8 peptide was functional and active after separation from the fusion protein and had improved inhibitory activity against Gram-positive bacteria compared with the parent peptides.
MICs of LF15-CA8 for the tested bacteria (mg/l)
| Peptides . | Tested bacteria . | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. aureus ATCC 25923 . | E. coli O78 . | P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 . | S. pullorum CCVC 533 . | |
| LF15-CA8 | 32 | 32 | 64 | 32 |
| LfcinB | 64 | 128 | 128 | 128 |
| Cecropin A | >256 | 16 | 32 | 32 |
| Peptides . | Tested bacteria . | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. aureus ATCC 25923 . | E. coli O78 . | P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 . | S. pullorum CCVC 533 . | |
| LF15-CA8 | 32 | 32 | 64 | 32 |
| LfcinB | 64 | 128 | 128 | 128 |
| Cecropin A | >256 | 16 | 32 | 32 |
MICs of LF15-CA8 for the tested bacteria (mg/l)
| Peptides . | Tested bacteria . | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. aureus ATCC 25923 . | E. coli O78 . | P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 . | S. pullorum CCVC 533 . | |
| LF15-CA8 | 32 | 32 | 64 | 32 |
| LfcinB | 64 | 128 | 128 | 128 |
| Cecropin A | >256 | 16 | 32 | 32 |
| Peptides . | Tested bacteria . | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. aureus ATCC 25923 . | E. coli O78 . | P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 . | S. pullorum CCVC 533 . | |
| LF15-CA8 | 32 | 32 | 64 | 32 |
| LfcinB | 64 | 128 | 128 | 128 |
| Cecropin A | >256 | 16 | 32 | 32 |
Hemolytic activities of the peptide
Fresh HRBC cells were used in the present study to find out whether the peptide LF15-CA8 caused membrane lysis of eukaryotic cells. As observed in Table 2, the three tested peptides all showed a certain lytic activity against HRBC and the peptide LF15-CA8 showed similar hemolytic properties to LfcinB and cecropin A. The lytic activity of LF15-CA8 was increased at higher peptide concentration. However, the percentage lysis of HRBC was very low and less than 1.5 % even at the LF15-CA8 concentration of 256 μg/ml, which was eight times higher than the lethal concentration for E. coli. These results suggested that there was no obvious or very low hemolytic activity for LF15-CA8 against HRBC in the range of its antibacterial concentration.
Percent lysis of human red blood cells at different concentrations of peptides
| Peptides . | Concentrations of peptides (μg/ml) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 . | 16 . | 32 . | 64 . | 128 . | 256 . | |
| LF15-CA8 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.54 ± 0.13 | 0.97 ± 0.17 | 1.13 ± 0.23 | 1.32 ± 0.18 |
| LfcinB | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0.19 ± 0.10 | 0.41 ± 0.09 | 0.86 ± 0.08 | 0.99 ± 0.17 | 1.30 ± 0.20 |
| Cecropin A | 0.13 ± 0.06 | 0.27 ± 0.09 | 0.48 ± 0.11 | 1.11 ± 0.12 | 1.21 ± 0.19 | 1.42 ± 0.22 |
| Peptides . | Concentrations of peptides (μg/ml) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 . | 16 . | 32 . | 64 . | 128 . | 256 . | |
| LF15-CA8 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.54 ± 0.13 | 0.97 ± 0.17 | 1.13 ± 0.23 | 1.32 ± 0.18 |
| LfcinB | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0.19 ± 0.10 | 0.41 ± 0.09 | 0.86 ± 0.08 | 0.99 ± 0.17 | 1.30 ± 0.20 |
| Cecropin A | 0.13 ± 0.06 | 0.27 ± 0.09 | 0.48 ± 0.11 | 1.11 ± 0.12 | 1.21 ± 0.19 | 1.42 ± 0.22 |
Percent lysis of human red blood cells at different concentrations of peptides
| Peptides . | Concentrations of peptides (μg/ml) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 . | 16 . | 32 . | 64 . | 128 . | 256 . | |
| LF15-CA8 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.54 ± 0.13 | 0.97 ± 0.17 | 1.13 ± 0.23 | 1.32 ± 0.18 |
| LfcinB | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0.19 ± 0.10 | 0.41 ± 0.09 | 0.86 ± 0.08 | 0.99 ± 0.17 | 1.30 ± 0.20 |
| Cecropin A | 0.13 ± 0.06 | 0.27 ± 0.09 | 0.48 ± 0.11 | 1.11 ± 0.12 | 1.21 ± 0.19 | 1.42 ± 0.22 |
| Peptides . | Concentrations of peptides (μg/ml) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 . | 16 . | 32 . | 64 . | 128 . | 256 . | |
| LF15-CA8 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.54 ± 0.13 | 0.97 ± 0.17 | 1.13 ± 0.23 | 1.32 ± 0.18 |
| LfcinB | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0.19 ± 0.10 | 0.41 ± 0.09 | 0.86 ± 0.08 | 0.99 ± 0.17 | 1.30 ± 0.20 |
| Cecropin A | 0.13 ± 0.06 | 0.27 ± 0.09 | 0.48 ± 0.11 | 1.11 ± 0.12 | 1.21 ± 0.19 | 1.42 ± 0.22 |
Discussion
To expedite the pharmaceutical and clinical applications of AMPs, a cost-effective and scalable method for production of active and effective AMPs is required. It is presently recognized that the recombinant DNA technique is a potential means of producing AMPs in large quantities. In recent years, many AMPs have been successfully produced using genetic engineering methods. Many host cells have been used for expression of AMPs, but E. coli has been considered as one of the most efficient recombinant bioreactors owing to its fast growth rate and well-established expression system [25, 34].
Procedures to express AMPs in E. coli have encountered difficulties associated with low levels of expression, susceptibility to proteolytic degradation, and poor recovery yields as the result of toxicity to the bacteria host and the small size of AMPs. These problems can be efficiently solved using a fusion expression strategy generally employed in the production of AMPs by an E. coli expression system. But the actual expression level of AMPs is not satisfactory because of the small proportion of AMPs relative to the fusion proteins, especially when large fusion partners are chosen. Expression of AMPs multimer would be an efficient way to increase the production of AMPs expressed as fusion proteins. Many experiments have been performed to express various peptides as multimers in E. coli to achieve mass production [14, 19, 31]. In this study, different constructs containing 1–6 LF15-CA8 coding regions were developed by the isocaudamer method. Somewhat unexpectedly and unfortunately, only transformants harboring pGEX-4T-LC1 and pGEX-4T-LC2 successfully expressed the target fusion proteins, and other constructs (pGEX-4T-LC3-6) transformants failed to produce more proteins. This result was similar to that of many other reports [16, 19, 31]. This might result from the basic nature of peptides, which can inhibit transcription and translation through the interaction with DNA or RNA [12, 23].
A lot of work on the production of AMPs by an E. coli expression system was carried out. However, purification requires multiple biochemical steps that are expensive and significantly reduce yield, even when production is possible. Expression of AMPs in inclusion bodies is beneficial to high expression level, facile separation, and high recovery from the cell lysate. But it will raise new challenges such as the time-consuming and low refolding rate in the following dissolving and renaturing processes of inclusion bodies [15, 37]. Generally, there are several options available to cleave a peptide from its fusion partner, utilizing both chemical and enzymatic routes of cleavage. Several proteases, such as thrombin, factor Xa, or enterokinase, will cleave at their recognition sites, once these are introduced within the linker between the fusion partner and the target peptide. However, these enzymes are expensive and not feasible for industrial-scale purification.
Chemical cleavage reagents are economical and applicable on an industrial scale. Formic acid can recognize and cleave the acid-labile peptide bond between Asp and Pro. Several reports have introduced methods for producing AMPs in an E. coli expression system and the yield is attractive and competitive. Kovaleva et al. [17] employed the pET system to express PsDef1 fused to GST and achieved 1 mg of rPsDef1 per liter of bacterial culture after removing the GST moiety with factor Xa. Shen et al. [29] utilized a self-cleaving ELP system as the tool to express AMPs and obtained 0.6 mg of moricin CM4 and 1.8 mg of human β-defensins 4 from 1 l of their growth media of E. coli. Bang et al. [2] developed a pET expression system of E. coli which produced 2.10 mg of the hybrid peptide hin/MSH from 800 ml of culture medium.
In this work, the cleavage site of formic acid was introduced at both terminals of the peptide. The specific cleavage to the fusion protein was successfully achieved by formic acid and the recombinant peptide, which has the same amino acid sequence and molecular weight as predicted, was obtained after purification by RP-HPLC. Another important advantage of the protocol is that the inclusion bodies were dissolved and digested by 70 % formic acid in a single step, and the complicated and time-consuming treatment steps were left out for dissolution and renaturation of inclusion bodies. About 10.0 mg of the recombinant peptide with a purity of more than 97 % was obtained from 1 l of bacteria culture of pGEX-4T-LC2, and this yield is almost two times that of pGEX-4T-LC1, suggesting the effectiveness of the protocols developed in this study for production improvement of small peptides by the gene recombinant technology.
In recent years, hybridization methods have attracted considerable interest as an approach to obtain novel AMPs with more potent activity. Hybrid peptides can possess better combinations of various parameters than their parent peptides. The novel hybrid AMP LF15-CA8 was designed on the basis of LfcinB and cecropin A. To increase the degree of the hybrid peptide and develop individual antimicrobial activity as far as possible, a soft peptide linker (GSG) was introduced between them. Absence of the side-chain group of the Gly residue allows the free formation of an α-helix, while the Ser residue is often involved in a disordered structure [20, 32]. So, the peptide linker composed of Gly and Ser residues is helpful to keep separate spatial structure and biological function for two peptides.
The antibacterial assay demonstrated that the recombinant peptide had remarkable antibacterial activity, and improved activity against Gram-positive bacterium S. aureus ATCC 25923 compared with the parent peptides. No difference between the recombinant and chemically synthetic peptides was observed in antibacterial activities against the tested bacteria, in spite of the unwanted residues Asp and Pro left at the N-terminal and C-terminal, respectively, of the recombinant peptide after digestion by formic acid. In addition, LF15-CA8 has no obvious hemolytic effect on HRBC. However, further work will be required to elucidate the action mechanism, immunogenicity, and biologic function of LF15-CA8 in vivo.
Conclusions
A novel hybrid AMP was designed on the basis of LfcinB and cecropin A, and successfully expressed by an E. coli expression system. Dissolution and digestion of the inclusion bodies of fusion protein were achieved in one step by treatment with formic acid. The recombinant peptide was active against tested bacteria and showed higher activity against the Gram-positive bacterium S. aureus ATCC 25923 than the parent peptides. These results suggested that the hybrid peptide is a potential candidate for pharmaceutical and clinical development. The protocols presented in this study may be a valuable method for producing large quantities of active AMPs in E. coli.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30800794), Program for Young Aged Academic Staff in the Heilongjiang Province Ordinary College (1252G010), and Research Fund for Innovation Talents of Science and Technology in Harbin City (2012RFQXN022).
References
Sambrook J, Fristsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) In: Sambrook J (ed) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp 96–99




