-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Wen-Juan Jiao, Fei-Qiang Li, Yue-Liang Bai, Xiao-Xiao Shi, Mu-Fei Zhu, Min-Jing Zhang, Cun-Gui Mao, Zeng-Rong Zhu, Rice Stripe Virus Infection Alters mRNA Levels of Sphingolipid-Metabolizing Enzymes and Sphingolipids Content in Laodelphax striatellus, Journal of Insect Science, Volume 17, Issue 1, January 2017, 16, https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iew111
- Share Icon Share
Sphingolipids and their metabolites have been implicated in viral infection and replication in mammal cells but how their metabolizing enzymes in the host are regulated by viruses remains largely unknown. Here we report the identification of 12 sphingolipid genes and their regulation by Rice stripe virus in the small brown planthopper (Laodelphax striatellus Fallén), a serious pest of rice throughout eastern Asia. According to protein sequence similarity, we identified 12 sphingolipid enzyme genes in L. striatellus. By comparing their mRNA levels in viruliferous versus nonviruliferous L. striatellus at different life stages by qPCR, we found that RSV infection upregulated six genes (LsCGT1, LsNAGA1, LsSGPP, LsSMPD4, LsSMS, and LsSPT) in most stages of L. striatellus. Especially, four genes (LsCGT1, LsSMPD2, LsNAGA1, and LsSMS) and another three genes (LsNAGA1, LsSGPP, and LsSMS) were significantly upregulated in viruliferous third-instar and fourth-instar nymphs, respectively. HPLC-MS/MS results showed that RSV infection increased the levels of various ceramides, such as Cer18:0, Cer20:0, and Cer22:0 species, in third and fourth instar L. striatellus nymphs. Together, these results demonstrate that RSV infection alters the transcript levels of various sphingolipid enzymes and the contents of sphingolipids in L. striatellus, indicating that sphingolipids may be important for RSV infection or replication in L. striatellus.
Sphingolipids are a family of lipids which play important roles in maintaining the integrity and the function of eukaryotic membranes (Hannun and Obeid 2008) and mediating various biological processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis (Phan et al. 2007). More recently, sphingolipids and their metabolizing enzymes have also been implicated in regulating the interactions between bacterial or viral pathogens and plants or animals (Heung et al. 2006; Gulbins and Petrache 2013). For instance, several studies showed that the enrichment of ceramides could support cell fusion and enhance the entry of viruses (Schneider-Schaulies and Schneider-Schaulies 2015). Ceramides are mainly generated by the desaturation of dihydroceramide and breakdown of sphingomyelins. Inhibition of Serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT), the first-step enzyme in ceramide biosynthesis (Kong et al. 2015), suppressed the replication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in mammalian cells (Umehara et al. 2006; Katsume et al. 2013). Sphingomyelinase (SMase), which is responsible for the degradation of sphingomyelin and synthesis of ceramide, was activated by several viruses such as measles virus, rhinovirus (RV), and dengue virus (Schneider-Schaulies and Schneider-Schaulies 2015). Sphingomyelin synthase (SMS) was also required for HIV-mediated membrane fusion by co-localizing with HIV receptor in the plasma membrane (Hayashi et al. 2014).
S1P, which is synthesized from sphingosine by the action of sphingosine kinases, has been shown to be a crucial mediator in the pathogenesis of viral-associated disease (Monick et al. 2004). Inhibition of SK blocked S1P synthesis, resulting in accelerated cell death after respiratory syncytial virus infection (Monick et al. 2004). Overexpression of SK increased the replication of MV in HEK cells (Vijayan et al. 2014). Glycosphingolipids, which have great influence on membrane fluidity, curvature, and organization, can impact HIV trans-infection in dendritic cells by modulating virus infectivity or cell membrane (Puryear and Gummuluru 2013). Increased alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase (NAGA) activity has been associated with viral infection (Bradstreet et al. 2012).

The pathway of Sphingolipid metabolism. The enzymes analyzed in this study are in red and full names were listed in Table 1. KDS, 3-keto-dihydrosphingosine reductase; DES, dihydroceramide desaturase; C1PP, C1P phosphatase; Csase, ceramidase; SK, sphingosine kinase; SPL, sphingosine-1-phosphate.
Materials and Methods
Insects
The RSV-free and RSV-infected L. striatellus colonies were reared on XiuShui rice seedling in separated cages at 25 ± 1 °C, 70% relative humidity and 16:8 light:dark photoperiod. The viruliferous L. striatellus colony was purified by rearing the offspring of a single female. After detecting the RSV offspring by reverse transcription PCR with the coat protein (CP) gene primers, the non-viruliferous L. striatellus was screened. The viruliferous rate of viruliferous L. striatellus colony was maintained at around 90% and the high-viruliferous L. striatellus were reared in glass beakers (size: 500 mL) as stock population.
Identification of Sphingolipid Enzyme Genes
We first used the algorithm Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) to search the sequences of 10 known sphingolipid enzyme genes of insects or mammals. Then these known sphingolipid genes in GenBank were used to search for their homologous genes in the L. striatellus transcriptome database that was built in our previous work (Zhou et al. 2015). To confirm the identity of the putative sphingolipid genes in L. striatellus, BLASTX was performed to compare them against the non-redundant database at NCBI (Table 1).
Gene sequence comparison of studied sphingolipid enzymes with other insects or mammals
Name . | Abr. . | Length (bp) . | Identity (%) . | Species . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase1 | LsNAGA1 | 1258 | 67 | Megachile rotundata |
Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase2 | LsNAGA2 | 782 | 75 | Cimex lectularius |
Ceramide glucosyltransferase1 | LsCGT1 | 1085 | 70 | Monomorium pharaonis |
Ceramide glucosyltransferase2 | LsCGT2 | 1275 | 69 | Bactrocera dorsalis |
Ceramide kinase | LsCK | 1774 | 67 | Diachasma alloeum |
Ceramide synthase6 | LsCS6 | 1241 | 70 | Cimex lectularius |
Glucosylceramidase | LsGSC | 1631 | 73 | Python bivittatus |
Serine palmitoyltransferase | LsSPT | 2537 | 75 | Zootermopsis nevadensis |
Sphingomyline sythase | LsSMS | 953 | 79 | Fopius arisanus |
Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 2 | LsSMPD2 | 1582 | 69 | Atta cephalotes |
Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 4 | LsSMPD4 | 624 | 72 | Microplitis demolitor |
Sphingosine 1 phosphate phosphatase | LsSGPP | 523 | 69 | Bombyx mori |
Name . | Abr. . | Length (bp) . | Identity (%) . | Species . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase1 | LsNAGA1 | 1258 | 67 | Megachile rotundata |
Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase2 | LsNAGA2 | 782 | 75 | Cimex lectularius |
Ceramide glucosyltransferase1 | LsCGT1 | 1085 | 70 | Monomorium pharaonis |
Ceramide glucosyltransferase2 | LsCGT2 | 1275 | 69 | Bactrocera dorsalis |
Ceramide kinase | LsCK | 1774 | 67 | Diachasma alloeum |
Ceramide synthase6 | LsCS6 | 1241 | 70 | Cimex lectularius |
Glucosylceramidase | LsGSC | 1631 | 73 | Python bivittatus |
Serine palmitoyltransferase | LsSPT | 2537 | 75 | Zootermopsis nevadensis |
Sphingomyline sythase | LsSMS | 953 | 79 | Fopius arisanus |
Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 2 | LsSMPD2 | 1582 | 69 | Atta cephalotes |
Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 4 | LsSMPD4 | 624 | 72 | Microplitis demolitor |
Sphingosine 1 phosphate phosphatase | LsSGPP | 523 | 69 | Bombyx mori |
Gene sequence comparison of studied sphingolipid enzymes with other insects or mammals
Name . | Abr. . | Length (bp) . | Identity (%) . | Species . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase1 | LsNAGA1 | 1258 | 67 | Megachile rotundata |
Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase2 | LsNAGA2 | 782 | 75 | Cimex lectularius |
Ceramide glucosyltransferase1 | LsCGT1 | 1085 | 70 | Monomorium pharaonis |
Ceramide glucosyltransferase2 | LsCGT2 | 1275 | 69 | Bactrocera dorsalis |
Ceramide kinase | LsCK | 1774 | 67 | Diachasma alloeum |
Ceramide synthase6 | LsCS6 | 1241 | 70 | Cimex lectularius |
Glucosylceramidase | LsGSC | 1631 | 73 | Python bivittatus |
Serine palmitoyltransferase | LsSPT | 2537 | 75 | Zootermopsis nevadensis |
Sphingomyline sythase | LsSMS | 953 | 79 | Fopius arisanus |
Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 2 | LsSMPD2 | 1582 | 69 | Atta cephalotes |
Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 4 | LsSMPD4 | 624 | 72 | Microplitis demolitor |
Sphingosine 1 phosphate phosphatase | LsSGPP | 523 | 69 | Bombyx mori |
Name . | Abr. . | Length (bp) . | Identity (%) . | Species . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase1 | LsNAGA1 | 1258 | 67 | Megachile rotundata |
Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase2 | LsNAGA2 | 782 | 75 | Cimex lectularius |
Ceramide glucosyltransferase1 | LsCGT1 | 1085 | 70 | Monomorium pharaonis |
Ceramide glucosyltransferase2 | LsCGT2 | 1275 | 69 | Bactrocera dorsalis |
Ceramide kinase | LsCK | 1774 | 67 | Diachasma alloeum |
Ceramide synthase6 | LsCS6 | 1241 | 70 | Cimex lectularius |
Glucosylceramidase | LsGSC | 1631 | 73 | Python bivittatus |
Serine palmitoyltransferase | LsSPT | 2537 | 75 | Zootermopsis nevadensis |
Sphingomyline sythase | LsSMS | 953 | 79 | Fopius arisanus |
Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 2 | LsSMPD2 | 1582 | 69 | Atta cephalotes |
Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 4 | LsSMPD4 | 624 | 72 | Microplitis demolitor |
Sphingosine 1 phosphate phosphatase | LsSGPP | 523 | 69 | Bombyx mori |
Sphingolipid Enzymes Cloning
First, second-, third-, fourth-, fifth-instar nymphs and their male or female adults of non-viruliferous L. striatellus and viruliferous L. striatellus were collected and total RNA were extracted from these insects using the RNA extraction reagent Trizol (Invitrogen, USA) according to the instructions from the manufacturer. One μg of RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA in a 20 μl reaction using PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, China). According to the sequences found in the transcriptome dataset of L. striatellus, specific primers for putative sphingolipid genes were designed and synthesized by Biosun Biotech (Hangzhou, China). The primer pair specific for each putative sphingolipid gene was used along with eTaq (Takara, China) to amplify its cDNA from the cDNA templates. The resulting PCR product was gel purified, ligated into the vector pGEM-T (Promega, USA), and transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α. Three independent clones were selected and sequenced.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR
To investigate RSV proliferation in different life stages of L. striatellus, the primer pair specific for the RSV CP gene was designed based on its sequence (GenBank accession no. X53563). The primers for sphingolipid enzymes used in quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) were also designed based on the sequences of PCR products (Table 2). The qPCR reaction was performed in Bio-Rad CFX96 real time system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) using TransStart Top Green qPCR SuperMix (Transgen, China) according to the instructions from the manufacturer. Briefly, 10 ng of cDNA, 10 μl 2 × TransStart Tip Green qPCR SuperMix, 0.4 μl of each primer and ddH2O were added to make a 20 μl reaction, and PCR was performed under the following conditions: denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles of 94 °C for 5 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. The actin gene of L. striatellus was used as an internal gene to normalize the target gene expression and to correct the variation of sample-to-sample. The relative expression levels of sphingolipid enzymes and RSV CP were calculated based on the relative quantitative method (2-ΔΔCt) (Livak and Schmittgen 2001). Statistical analyses were performed using the Data Processing System (DPS) software (Tang and Zhang 2013). A two-way analysis of variance with least significant difference test was applied to compare differences in gene expression among multisamples. The level of significant difference was set at < 0.05.
Gene . | Primers . | Sequence(5′–3′) . | Accession no. . | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reverse transcription PCR | ||||
LsNAGA1 | F | CCTCAAATCAAGCAGACACG | KU757057 | |
R | CCCATCCTTATGTTATTTTTCGTT | |||
LsNAGA2 | F | CTTTGAAGATCGCCGTGAAT | KU757058 | |
R | CCTCCATAAGTTGCAGTGCTC | |||
LsCGT1 | F | TCCAGAATCTCCCAGCTACG | KU757055 | |
R | CTGTCAACCCTCCCCAACTA | |||
LsCGT2 | F | TGCCAAAAACTCACTATATCGAA | KU757056 | |
R | CACAATGTTCCCAGCACTTTT | |||
LsCK | F | AGCAACTTATTGTAAAGTTTCTCTTTG | KU757064 | |
R | ATTTTCAATTACTTTACAGACAAAAGC | |||
LsCS6 | F | CGTATCCACTACCGTTTGCAT | KU757063 | |
R | GCGGCAAGTATCAATTCTAGTACA | |||
LsGSC | F | GAACTAAGAATGCTTCTCCCACA | KU757062 | |
R | GGCATCCAAGTTCAATGCTG | |||
LsSMPD2 | F | CGTCTAGACCGGGCTTAAGAA | KU757061 | |
R | GAACGATTGTTTACGACTGCAA | |||
LsSPT | F | TGGAAGCGCCCTGTCTATTA | KU737582 | |
R | AAAACAGTCTCTCTTCCGTTTCA | |||
LsSMS | F | TATTTTCGAAGATGAAGCAAGC | KU757060 | |
R | GGTGTTATTAATTCACCACCATTC | |||
LsSMPD4 | F | CTCAACTACCATTGGGCATTC | KU757059 | |
R | GCTCGCTGCGAAACAATAAG | |||
LsSGPP | F | CCACAACGATGAAGGTGACT | KU757057 | |
R | GACCATTGGCTGATCACTAGC | |||
RSV-CP | F | CTAGTCATCTGCACCTTCTG | ||
R | ATGGGTACCAACAAGCCAGC | |||
Quantitative RT- PCR | ||||
LsNAGA1 | F | GCTGAGTGGGAGGTCGATTA | ||
R | CGCTGTAATTTGGCATCCTT | |||
LsNAGA2 | F | ACAGGAGAACCGATGGTACG | ||
R | GTAAGGGATGGGTTGCACAT | |||
LsCGT1 | F | ACTGTTTGTGGGCAACAGTG | ||
R | TCGCAAACAAACGGTAACTG | |||
LsCGT2 | F | GTGGGAGGCATACAAGCATT | ||
R | TCGCAACCCTTAATTTGGTC | |||
LsCK | F | GCCAATCATGGGTATGAAGG | ||
R | ACTTCTCGGACAGGCACAAG | |||
LsCS6 | F | GTTGGCTCGCTTGTTCTTCT | ||
R | ATCGCAGTGCTCCAAAGAAT | |||
LsGSC | F | TGAAGGTTGCCATATCACCA | ||
R | TAGGGATGCGTGGAAAAGTC | |||
LsSMPD2 | F | TTGCGTTTGTGTCGAAAGAC | ||
R | CCTCTATCGGCCATCTTGAA | |||
LsSPT | F | TCCTAATGGGCACTTTCACC | ||
R | CCATCTTGGCCCATAATGAC | |||
LsSMS | F | CGGACACGAGCATTACTCAA | ||
R | TGTCGTACTCGTTGGGAACA | |||
LsSMPD4 | F | CCCCACTCCAAGACCTCATA | ||
R | CACACAAGCGTGCTACCAAT | |||
LsSGPP | F | GTCCTCCGGTACACAGGCTA | ||
R | ATCACTAGGCCCAAATGCAG | |||
LsActin | F | CCGCCTCCTCCAGTTCAC | ||
R | TGTCCAC GTCGCACTTCAT |
Gene . | Primers . | Sequence(5′–3′) . | Accession no. . | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reverse transcription PCR | ||||
LsNAGA1 | F | CCTCAAATCAAGCAGACACG | KU757057 | |
R | CCCATCCTTATGTTATTTTTCGTT | |||
LsNAGA2 | F | CTTTGAAGATCGCCGTGAAT | KU757058 | |
R | CCTCCATAAGTTGCAGTGCTC | |||
LsCGT1 | F | TCCAGAATCTCCCAGCTACG | KU757055 | |
R | CTGTCAACCCTCCCCAACTA | |||
LsCGT2 | F | TGCCAAAAACTCACTATATCGAA | KU757056 | |
R | CACAATGTTCCCAGCACTTTT | |||
LsCK | F | AGCAACTTATTGTAAAGTTTCTCTTTG | KU757064 | |
R | ATTTTCAATTACTTTACAGACAAAAGC | |||
LsCS6 | F | CGTATCCACTACCGTTTGCAT | KU757063 | |
R | GCGGCAAGTATCAATTCTAGTACA | |||
LsGSC | F | GAACTAAGAATGCTTCTCCCACA | KU757062 | |
R | GGCATCCAAGTTCAATGCTG | |||
LsSMPD2 | F | CGTCTAGACCGGGCTTAAGAA | KU757061 | |
R | GAACGATTGTTTACGACTGCAA | |||
LsSPT | F | TGGAAGCGCCCTGTCTATTA | KU737582 | |
R | AAAACAGTCTCTCTTCCGTTTCA | |||
LsSMS | F | TATTTTCGAAGATGAAGCAAGC | KU757060 | |
R | GGTGTTATTAATTCACCACCATTC | |||
LsSMPD4 | F | CTCAACTACCATTGGGCATTC | KU757059 | |
R | GCTCGCTGCGAAACAATAAG | |||
LsSGPP | F | CCACAACGATGAAGGTGACT | KU757057 | |
R | GACCATTGGCTGATCACTAGC | |||
RSV-CP | F | CTAGTCATCTGCACCTTCTG | ||
R | ATGGGTACCAACAAGCCAGC | |||
Quantitative RT- PCR | ||||
LsNAGA1 | F | GCTGAGTGGGAGGTCGATTA | ||
R | CGCTGTAATTTGGCATCCTT | |||
LsNAGA2 | F | ACAGGAGAACCGATGGTACG | ||
R | GTAAGGGATGGGTTGCACAT | |||
LsCGT1 | F | ACTGTTTGTGGGCAACAGTG | ||
R | TCGCAAACAAACGGTAACTG | |||
LsCGT2 | F | GTGGGAGGCATACAAGCATT | ||
R | TCGCAACCCTTAATTTGGTC | |||
LsCK | F | GCCAATCATGGGTATGAAGG | ||
R | ACTTCTCGGACAGGCACAAG | |||
LsCS6 | F | GTTGGCTCGCTTGTTCTTCT | ||
R | ATCGCAGTGCTCCAAAGAAT | |||
LsGSC | F | TGAAGGTTGCCATATCACCA | ||
R | TAGGGATGCGTGGAAAAGTC | |||
LsSMPD2 | F | TTGCGTTTGTGTCGAAAGAC | ||
R | CCTCTATCGGCCATCTTGAA | |||
LsSPT | F | TCCTAATGGGCACTTTCACC | ||
R | CCATCTTGGCCCATAATGAC | |||
LsSMS | F | CGGACACGAGCATTACTCAA | ||
R | TGTCGTACTCGTTGGGAACA | |||
LsSMPD4 | F | CCCCACTCCAAGACCTCATA | ||
R | CACACAAGCGTGCTACCAAT | |||
LsSGPP | F | GTCCTCCGGTACACAGGCTA | ||
R | ATCACTAGGCCCAAATGCAG | |||
LsActin | F | CCGCCTCCTCCAGTTCAC | ||
R | TGTCCAC GTCGCACTTCAT |
Gene . | Primers . | Sequence(5′–3′) . | Accession no. . | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reverse transcription PCR | ||||
LsNAGA1 | F | CCTCAAATCAAGCAGACACG | KU757057 | |
R | CCCATCCTTATGTTATTTTTCGTT | |||
LsNAGA2 | F | CTTTGAAGATCGCCGTGAAT | KU757058 | |
R | CCTCCATAAGTTGCAGTGCTC | |||
LsCGT1 | F | TCCAGAATCTCCCAGCTACG | KU757055 | |
R | CTGTCAACCCTCCCCAACTA | |||
LsCGT2 | F | TGCCAAAAACTCACTATATCGAA | KU757056 | |
R | CACAATGTTCCCAGCACTTTT | |||
LsCK | F | AGCAACTTATTGTAAAGTTTCTCTTTG | KU757064 | |
R | ATTTTCAATTACTTTACAGACAAAAGC | |||
LsCS6 | F | CGTATCCACTACCGTTTGCAT | KU757063 | |
R | GCGGCAAGTATCAATTCTAGTACA | |||
LsGSC | F | GAACTAAGAATGCTTCTCCCACA | KU757062 | |
R | GGCATCCAAGTTCAATGCTG | |||
LsSMPD2 | F | CGTCTAGACCGGGCTTAAGAA | KU757061 | |
R | GAACGATTGTTTACGACTGCAA | |||
LsSPT | F | TGGAAGCGCCCTGTCTATTA | KU737582 | |
R | AAAACAGTCTCTCTTCCGTTTCA | |||
LsSMS | F | TATTTTCGAAGATGAAGCAAGC | KU757060 | |
R | GGTGTTATTAATTCACCACCATTC | |||
LsSMPD4 | F | CTCAACTACCATTGGGCATTC | KU757059 | |
R | GCTCGCTGCGAAACAATAAG | |||
LsSGPP | F | CCACAACGATGAAGGTGACT | KU757057 | |
R | GACCATTGGCTGATCACTAGC | |||
RSV-CP | F | CTAGTCATCTGCACCTTCTG | ||
R | ATGGGTACCAACAAGCCAGC | |||
Quantitative RT- PCR | ||||
LsNAGA1 | F | GCTGAGTGGGAGGTCGATTA | ||
R | CGCTGTAATTTGGCATCCTT | |||
LsNAGA2 | F | ACAGGAGAACCGATGGTACG | ||
R | GTAAGGGATGGGTTGCACAT | |||
LsCGT1 | F | ACTGTTTGTGGGCAACAGTG | ||
R | TCGCAAACAAACGGTAACTG | |||
LsCGT2 | F | GTGGGAGGCATACAAGCATT | ||
R | TCGCAACCCTTAATTTGGTC | |||
LsCK | F | GCCAATCATGGGTATGAAGG | ||
R | ACTTCTCGGACAGGCACAAG | |||
LsCS6 | F | GTTGGCTCGCTTGTTCTTCT | ||
R | ATCGCAGTGCTCCAAAGAAT | |||
LsGSC | F | TGAAGGTTGCCATATCACCA | ||
R | TAGGGATGCGTGGAAAAGTC | |||
LsSMPD2 | F | TTGCGTTTGTGTCGAAAGAC | ||
R | CCTCTATCGGCCATCTTGAA | |||
LsSPT | F | TCCTAATGGGCACTTTCACC | ||
R | CCATCTTGGCCCATAATGAC | |||
LsSMS | F | CGGACACGAGCATTACTCAA | ||
R | TGTCGTACTCGTTGGGAACA | |||
LsSMPD4 | F | CCCCACTCCAAGACCTCATA | ||
R | CACACAAGCGTGCTACCAAT | |||
LsSGPP | F | GTCCTCCGGTACACAGGCTA | ||
R | ATCACTAGGCCCAAATGCAG | |||
LsActin | F | CCGCCTCCTCCAGTTCAC | ||
R | TGTCCAC GTCGCACTTCAT |
Gene . | Primers . | Sequence(5′–3′) . | Accession no. . | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reverse transcription PCR | ||||
LsNAGA1 | F | CCTCAAATCAAGCAGACACG | KU757057 | |
R | CCCATCCTTATGTTATTTTTCGTT | |||
LsNAGA2 | F | CTTTGAAGATCGCCGTGAAT | KU757058 | |
R | CCTCCATAAGTTGCAGTGCTC | |||
LsCGT1 | F | TCCAGAATCTCCCAGCTACG | KU757055 | |
R | CTGTCAACCCTCCCCAACTA | |||
LsCGT2 | F | TGCCAAAAACTCACTATATCGAA | KU757056 | |
R | CACAATGTTCCCAGCACTTTT | |||
LsCK | F | AGCAACTTATTGTAAAGTTTCTCTTTG | KU757064 | |
R | ATTTTCAATTACTTTACAGACAAAAGC | |||
LsCS6 | F | CGTATCCACTACCGTTTGCAT | KU757063 | |
R | GCGGCAAGTATCAATTCTAGTACA | |||
LsGSC | F | GAACTAAGAATGCTTCTCCCACA | KU757062 | |
R | GGCATCCAAGTTCAATGCTG | |||
LsSMPD2 | F | CGTCTAGACCGGGCTTAAGAA | KU757061 | |
R | GAACGATTGTTTACGACTGCAA | |||
LsSPT | F | TGGAAGCGCCCTGTCTATTA | KU737582 | |
R | AAAACAGTCTCTCTTCCGTTTCA | |||
LsSMS | F | TATTTTCGAAGATGAAGCAAGC | KU757060 | |
R | GGTGTTATTAATTCACCACCATTC | |||
LsSMPD4 | F | CTCAACTACCATTGGGCATTC | KU757059 | |
R | GCTCGCTGCGAAACAATAAG | |||
LsSGPP | F | CCACAACGATGAAGGTGACT | KU757057 | |
R | GACCATTGGCTGATCACTAGC | |||
RSV-CP | F | CTAGTCATCTGCACCTTCTG | ||
R | ATGGGTACCAACAAGCCAGC | |||
Quantitative RT- PCR | ||||
LsNAGA1 | F | GCTGAGTGGGAGGTCGATTA | ||
R | CGCTGTAATTTGGCATCCTT | |||
LsNAGA2 | F | ACAGGAGAACCGATGGTACG | ||
R | GTAAGGGATGGGTTGCACAT | |||
LsCGT1 | F | ACTGTTTGTGGGCAACAGTG | ||
R | TCGCAAACAAACGGTAACTG | |||
LsCGT2 | F | GTGGGAGGCATACAAGCATT | ||
R | TCGCAACCCTTAATTTGGTC | |||
LsCK | F | GCCAATCATGGGTATGAAGG | ||
R | ACTTCTCGGACAGGCACAAG | |||
LsCS6 | F | GTTGGCTCGCTTGTTCTTCT | ||
R | ATCGCAGTGCTCCAAAGAAT | |||
LsGSC | F | TGAAGGTTGCCATATCACCA | ||
R | TAGGGATGCGTGGAAAAGTC | |||
LsSMPD2 | F | TTGCGTTTGTGTCGAAAGAC | ||
R | CCTCTATCGGCCATCTTGAA | |||
LsSPT | F | TCCTAATGGGCACTTTCACC | ||
R | CCATCTTGGCCCATAATGAC | |||
LsSMS | F | CGGACACGAGCATTACTCAA | ||
R | TGTCGTACTCGTTGGGAACA | |||
LsSMPD4 | F | CCCCACTCCAAGACCTCATA | ||
R | CACACAAGCGTGCTACCAAT | |||
LsSGPP | F | GTCCTCCGGTACACAGGCTA | ||
R | ATCACTAGGCCCAAATGCAG | |||
LsActin | F | CCGCCTCCTCCAGTTCAC | ||
R | TGTCCAC GTCGCACTTCAT |
HPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Sphingolipids
Total sphingolipids was extracted as described (Bielawski et al. 2006), and 0.3 g of third and fourth instar (mixed 1:1) nymphs were prepared for sphingolipids extraction. Total sphingolipids of two L. striatellus colonies were extracted in 50 ml iso-propanol: water: ethyl acetate (30:10:60) for 10 min. The organic phase containing total sphingolipids was dried under nitrogen and dissolved in 500 μl MeOH with 25 mmol/l ammonium formate. HPLC-MS/MS analysis was performed using agilent 6460 triple quadruple mass spectrometer coupled with agilent 1200 infinity LC modules. ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C8 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size, water) was chosen for the separation of sphingolipid and the injection volume was 10 μl. The mobile phases were as follows: phase A (25 mmol/l ammonium formate) and phase B (acetonitrile). The follow rate was 0.3 ml/min at 30 °C with the following gradient elution conditions of phase B: 20–95%, 0–15 min; 95–100%, 15–30 min; 100%, 30–40 min. The ESI was carried out with gas temperature of 350 °C and the drying gas flow rate was 10 l/min, leading to nebulization pressure of 50 psi. The capillary voltage and fragmentor voltage was 3500 V and 100 V, respectively, and the collision energy was 20 V. Sphingolipid Mix I (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabama, USA) was used as a standard.
Results
Identification and Analysis of Sphingolipid Genes from L. striatellus
Twelve different transcripts of sphingolipid enzymes were identified from the transcriptome datasets (Zhang et al. 2010) of L. striatellus according to a similarity in protein sequence to known sphingolipid-metabolizing enzymes from mammals. They are alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase 1 (LsNAGA1), alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase 2 (LsNAGA2), ceramide glucosyltransferase 1 (LsCGT1), ceramide glucosyltransferase 2 (LsCGT2), ceramide kinase (LsCK), ceramide synthase 6 (LsCS6), glucosylceramidase (LsGSC), serine palmitoyltransferase (LsSPT), sphingomyline sythase (LsSMS), sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 2 (LsSMPD2), sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 4 (LsSMPD4), and sphingosine-1-phosphate phosphatase (LsSGPP) (Table 2). Using the BLASTN program of NCBI, we searched for homologous sequences of these transcripts in other insects and found that LsSPT contains the full-length open reading frame whereas the other transcripts contain part of the open reading frame. Sequence comparisons revealed that LsNAGA1 shared a 67% similarity with its ortholog in Megachile rotundata, LsNAGA2 a 75% in Cimex lectularius, LsCGT1 a 70% in Monomorium pharaonis, and LsCGT2 a 69% in Bactrocera dorsalis. Similarities of the other genes are listed in Table 1 and the percentage of identity varied from 66% to 79%.
RSV Proliferation in the Different Life Stages of L. striatellus

Relative quantification analysis of RSV CP transcript levels in different life stages of L. striatellus. 1st: first-instar; 2nd: second-instar; 3rd: third-instar; 4th: fourth-instar; 5th: fifth-instar. The relative CP transcript levels were calculated using L. striatellus actin as an internal control. Transcript levels were shown as the mean transcription relative to non-viruliferous first-instar nymph. All data are presented as means ± SE.
Transcription Profiling of Sphingolipid Enzymes in Different Life Stages

Expression levels of 12 sphingolipid enzymes in various developmental stages of RSV-infected L. striatellus and RSV-free L. striatellus by quantitative real-time PCR. All the nymphs and adults were collected 1 day after molting. Data are showed as means ± SE, logarithmic transformed means were compared by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with least significant difference (LSD) test. Different letters on the bar mean significant differences among different life stages (P< 0.05).
When comparing RSV-infected L. striatellus with RSV-free L. striatellus, six genes (LsCGT1, LsNAGA1, LsSGPP, LsSMPD4, LsSMS, and LsSPT) were more highly expressed in most stages of RSV-infected L. striatellus. In the adult stages, seven genes (LsCK, LsCGT1-2, LsNAGA1, LsSMPD4, LsSMS, and LsSPT) were expressed at greater levels in RSV-infected L. striatellus. Furthermore, LsSGPP and two genes (LsSMPD2 and LsCGT1) showed extremely higher expression in the fourth and third viruliferous nymphs, respectively. LsNAGA1 and LsSMS were extremely higher in both two stages. However, LsCK and LsCS6 were significantly higher in non-viruliferous nymphs than viruliferous nymphs. LsCGT2 showed a higher expression level in early non-viruliferous nymphs (first and second instar) compared with the early nymphs of viruliferous L. striatellus.
Relative Content of Sphingolipids in Third and Fourth Nymph of Two L. striatellus Colonies

The relative content of sphinganine, sphingosine, dihydroceramide, ceramide, and sphingomyelin species in non-viruliferous and viruliferous third and fourth instar-nymph. The total relative content of (A) sphingosines (Sph) and sphingasines (dSph); (B) ceramide (Cer) and dihydroceramide (dCer); (C) Sphingomyelin (SM). Relative content of (D) sphingasine species (dSph), (E) dihydroceramide species (dCer), (F) sphingomyelin species (SM), (G) sphingosine species (Sph), (H) ceramide species (Cer). RSV free: RSV-free L. striatellus; RSV infected: RSV-infected L. striatellus. Results are presented as mean ± SE. For non-viruliferous and viruliferous nymphs, comparisons and the statistical significance of differences in mean values was determined by ANOVA with LSD test. Different letters on the bars mean significant differences, P < 0.05.
Discussion
Increasing studies demonstrate that sphingolipids and their metabolizing enzymes may have a role in controlling viral infection in mammalian cells (Schneider-Schaulies and Schneider-Schaulies 2015). However, it remains unclear whether this is also true with viral infection in insects. In this study, we identified 12 genes that encode putative 12 distinct sphingolipid-metabolizing enzymes in L. striatellus and found that some of these genes and the contents of several sphingolipid species were regulated by RSV infection, suggesting that sphingolipids and their metabolizing enzymes may also play a role in viral infection of insects.
All protein sequences of 12 sphingolipid metabolizing enzymes (shown in Fig. 1) display significant homology to those found in other insects. Since sphingolipid biosynthetic pathway (Kihara et al. 2007) and their metabolizing enzymes are evolutionarily conserved (Huitema et al. 2004; Levy and Futerman 2010; Pitson 2011), we suggest that these 12 genes are highly conserved among insects (Table 1). According to the results of transcriptional profiling of six life stages, 12 genes were differentially expressed in two colonies of L. striatellus and had great variances between viruliferous and non-viruliferous L. striatellus (Fig. 3). LsCK showed lower expression in nymphs of viruliferous L. striatellus than in nymphs of non-viruliferous L. striatellus (Fig. 3), which may lead to ceramide accumulation in nymphs of viruliferous L. striatellus. We postulated that the increased ceramides may play roles in RSV infection or replication in L. striatellus since ceramide accumulation has been shown to facilitate Japanese encephalitis virus entry and infection in Huh cells (Bollinger et al. 2005; Tani et al. 2010). Moreover, the transcripts of LsCGT1, LsNAGA1, LsSGPP, LsSMPD4, LsSMS, and LsSPT were elevated in most stages of viruliferous L. striatellus compared with the non-viruliferous L. striatellus, suggesting that RSV infection may induce the expression of these six genes. It has been shown that suppressing SPT expression can inhibit HCV replication (Katsume et al. 2013), so we predicted that the increase in the expression of LsSPT may have a role in facilitating L. striatellus infection by RSV. As SMPD4 activation has been implicated in facilitating measles virus to infect cells (Mueller et al. 2014), it is possible that the increased expression of LsSMPD4 may also assist RSV to infect L. striatellus. The role for the other four genes in RSV infection remains to be determined.
Nymphs of L. striatellus, especially the third and fourth instar nymphs were proposed to be a more efficient vector to RSV than adults (Li et al. 2015). In this study, the transcriptional levels of RSV CP gene reached the peak at the third instar, so did the transcripts of four genes (LsCGT1, LsSMPD2, LsNAGA1, and LsSMS). This correlation may indicate a potential role of these genes in RSV replication in the third nymph. Viral infection and replication not only influence the transcript levels of sphingolipid enzymes but also the content of sphingolipid species. For instance, in HCMV infected cells, viral infection results in alteration of the content of several sphingolipid species, including ceramide, dihydrosphingosine-1-phosphate, and dihydrosphingosine (Machesky et al. 2008). In line with these observations, we observed the higher levels of ceramides in RSV-infected nymphs of L. striatellus, suggesting that RSV infection or replication may induce the accumulation of ceramides. It was suggested that ceramide-enrichment domains may create an environment enhancing virus infection (Schneider-Schaulies and Schneider-Schaulies 2015), we predicted that the increased ceramides may facilitate RSV to infect L. striatellus. In contrast to ceramides, the content of dihydrosphingosines (dSph) was decreased in virus-infected nymphs. Consistently, HCMV infection also reduced dSph levels in MRC-5 human primary fibroblasts cells (Machesky et al. 2008). It remains to be determined whether cells attempt to combat viral infection by lowering the level of dSph and sphingosine or decreased dSph facilitates viral infection.
In conclusion, many sphingolipid-metabolizing enzymes are highly conserved between L. striatellus and other insects. The expression of these sphingolipid-metabolizing enzymes is regulated during infection of L. striatellus by RSV, which leads to changes in the levels of ceramides and dSph in L. striatellus. The alteration in these sphingolipids may facilitate RSV to infect L. striatellus or is an adaptive mechanism by which L. striatellus limits RSV infection. The identification of these genes lays a molecular foundation to define the role of sphingolipids in controlling L. striatellus infection by RSV.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31575001) and National Key Technology Support Program (2012BAD19B01). We are especially grateful to Dr. S. Liu (Anhui Agricultural University) for editing the language of this article. We thank Ye Tan (Zhejiang University) for rearing the insects.
References Cited
Author notes
Subject Editor: Russell Jurenka