Dynamic ctDNA informs whole-course postoperative precise management of NSCLC (LUNGCA study)

Abstract

Background

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is valuable for detecting minimal residual disease (MRD). However, studies involving long-term blood sampling are required to comprehensively interpret the clinical use of ctDNA analyses.

Methods

We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study (LUNGCA) for dynamic ctDNA monitoring in lung cancer patients receiving curative-intent surgery. ctDNA analysis was conducted on preoperative plasma samples, at postoperative three days and one month, and then every three–six months for up to three years.

Results

233 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and 2336 longitudinal plasma samples were included; the median follow-up was 51.4 months. Post-comprehensive treatment (after radical surgery + necessary adjuvant therapy) MRD status was better at predicting relapse than postoperative MRD status (positive predictive value: 100% vs 90.0%; negative predictive value: 90.3% vs 90.1%). Patients with positive pre-adjuvant ctDNA and targetable mutations in tumor tissues had improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) with corresponding adjuvant TKI treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.01, P = .005], but adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve RFS (HR = 0.6, P = .491). Of patients receiving adjuvant therapies, patients with a negative- or positive-negative ctDNA change pattern had favourable and similar RFS (P = .419), whereas patients with a positive- or negative-positive pattern had worse RFS (P < .001). TKI therapy was more effective than chemotherapy in clearing ctDNA. Post-relapse ctDNA negativity was associated with favorable OS (HR = 0.4; P = .029).

Conclusions

Comprehensive interpretation of dynamic ctDNA monitoring data can inform precise whole-course postsurgical management of NSCLC patients.

Accepted manuscripts

Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.