-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Joseph R Habib, Ammar A Javed, I Quintus Molenaar, Christopher L Wolfgang, Marc G Besselink, for the PANC-PALS consortium , Recognizing IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer as a specific entity requiring prospective clinical studies: a call for international collaboration, JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2025;, djaf037, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf037
- Share Icon Share
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are frequently diagnosed with the widespread implementation of cross-sectional imaging. These neoplasms continue to pose unique diagnostic and clinical challenges, because their natural course may remain stable at low-grade dysplasia or progress into invasive cancer.
Once an IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer is diagnosed, management strategies are generally based on the more developed literature for pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-derived pancreatic cancer. Although for multiple phases of care, including surgical technique, pathological staging, perioperative chemotherapy, and postoperative surveillance, this may suffice, recent evidence has indicated that PanIN- and IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer are biologically distinct, with the latter associated with a better prognosis.1 It is thus conceivable that IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer should be also treated, staged, and followed up differently.
In the past, knowledge on IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer was limited to small case series limiting translation into clinical practice. More recently, international collaboration has led to significant developments.2-4 These consortia have advanced our limited understanding of the natural course, staging, and management. First, the expert proposed sub-staging classification of T1 IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer appears to be valid and should be implemented in future guidelines.5 Second, the treatment of IPMN dysplasia at the margin presents a unique scenario, with evidence supporting reresection of high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer when present at the frozen margin.6 Third, regarding adjuvant chemotherapy, it is becoming increasingly clear that, unlike in PanIN-derived pancreatic cancer, there may be a subset of patients with IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer who do not require adjuvant chemotherapy.2-4 Albeit exciting, before changing practice with confidence, prospective evidence is urgently needed.
Given the distinction of IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer, multicenter collaborations are likely the best way to study and improve how we treat these patients. The recently initiated international PANC-PALS consortium would be well suited to initiate and perform such studies together with leading experts in the field of IPMN.7 We call on centers to continue to collaborate to explore this field such that high-level evidence can be generated and specific guidelines that are divergent from those for PanIN-derived pancreatic cancer can be developed to provide optimized care for these unique patients.
Collaborators
PANC-PALS consortium members: Camila Hidalgo Salinas, Ingmar F. Rompen, Brady A. Campbell, D. Brock Hewitt, Lois A. Daamen, Greg D. Sacks, Katherine Morgan, Jin He.
Author contributions
Joseph Habib, MD (Conceptualization; Writing—original draft), Ammar A. Javed, MD (Conceptualization; Writing—original draft), I. Quintus Molenaar, MD, PhD (Conceptualization; Writing—review & editing), Christopher L. Wolfgang, MD, PhD (Conceptualization; Writing—review & editing), and Marc G. Besselink, MD, PhD (Conceptualization; Supervision; Writing—review & editing).
Funding
None declared.
Conflicts of interest
No conflict of interests for all authors.
Data availability
This correspondence contains no data.