Abstract

Background

Factors associated with poor outcomes of children with encephalitis are not well known. We sought to determine whether electroencephalography (EEG) findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities, or the presence of seizures at presentation were associated with poor outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients aged 0 to 21 years who met criteria for a diagnosis of encephalitis admitted between 2000 and 2010 was conducted. Parents of eligible children were contacted and completed 2 questionnaires that assessed current physical and emotional quality of life and neurological deficits at least 1 year after discharge.

Results

During the study period, we identified 142 patients with an International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision diagnosis of meningitis, meningoencephalitis, or encephalitis. Of these patients, 114 met criteria for a diagnosis of encephalitis, and 76 of these patients (representing 77 hospitalizations) had complete data available. Forty-nine (64%) patients were available for follow-up. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit were more likely to have abnormal EEG results (P = .001). The presence of seizures on admission was associated with ongoing seizure disorder at follow-up. One or more years after hospitalization, 78% of the patients had persistent symptoms, including 35% with seizures. Four (5%) of the patients died. Abnormal MRI findings and the number of abnormal findings on initial presentation were associated with lower quality-of-life scores.

Conclusions

Encephalitis leads to significant morbidity and death, and incomplete recovery is achieved in the majority of hospitalized patients. Abnormal EEG results were found more frequently in critically ill children, patients with abnormal MRI results had lower quality-of-life scores on follow-up, and the presence of seizures on admission was associated with ongoing seizure disorder and lower physical quality-of-life scores.

INTRODUCTION

Encephalitis is a serious illness that affects children worldwide. It is defined by the presence of an inflammatory process of the brain associated with clinical evidence of neurological dysfunction [1]. The initial presentation can include seizures, headache, paresis, vision loss, hearing impairment, and behavioral changes [2, 3]. Diagnosis is made by clinical presentation, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings, and electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities. For children, neurological impairment, which can lead to significant morbidity and death and affect long-term quality of life, has been reported in 25% to 60% of cases [3, 4]. Common long-term sequelae include epilepsy, developmental delay, learning disabilities, and chronic headaches [5].

The etiological agent is an important predictor of outcomes in patients with encephalitis [6], the epidemiology of which is geographically dependent [1]. Long-term outcomes have been explored for patients with a number of different viruses, such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) [710], Japanese encephalitis [11], enterovirus [12, 13], and Epstein Barr virus [14]. However, in up to 75% of cases of encephalitis, an etiology is not found [1, 15]. There have been few published studies regarding the long-term neurological outcome of pediatric patients with encephalitis, accounting for those without an etiology, using standardized outcome measures. The use of standardized measures can enhance our understanding of the outcomes associated with encephalitis and help us to identify potential risk factors for more severe disease; these measures are used also for other pediatric neurological insults, such as traumatic brain injury and stroke [16, 17]. Therefore, there were 2 main objectives of this study. The first objective was to use standardized measures to explore the long-term outcomes of children with encephalitis to further characterize the impact of this disease state in quantifiable terms. The second objective was to determine whether EEG and MRI abnormalities and the presence of seizures on initial presentation are risk factors for persistent neurological abnormalities or if they impact quality of life.

METHODS

Study Population

We reviewed the medical records of patients admitted to Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, between 2000 and 2010 with an International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision (ICD-9) discharge diagnosis code of encephalitis, meningoencephalitis, or meningitis. Patients were eligible for the study if they had a diagnosis of encephalitis, which was defined as documented encephalopathy (depressed or altered level of consciousness lasting >24 hours, lethargy, or personality change) plus 2 or more of the following: temperature of >38°C; new-onset seizure(s); focal central nervous system findings; abnormal EEG findings compatible with encephalitis; abnormal brain computed tomography (CT) scan or MRI results; or CSF pleocytosis >2 standard deviations of the mean for their age [18]. Patients with insufficient data, anti–N-methyl D-aspartate receptor encephalitis, or a hematologic/oncologic diagnosis were excluded from the study. Demographic, clinical laboratory, EEG, and neuroimaging data of each patient were obtained. Approval for the study was obtained from the Colorado Multiple Institutions Review Board (08-1299). Informed written consent was obtained for the follow-up questionnaires.

Follow-Up

Patients who met the study criteria for a diagnosis of encephalitis were eligible for follow-up if at least 1 year had passed since their original diagnosis. A structured telephone interview was conducted with parents of eligible patients using 2 questionnaires designed to assess quality of life; they were also mailed if requested by a parent. The first questionnaire was the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales [19], which is a 23-item scale designed to measure health-related quality of life in 4 categories: physical functioning (8 items), emotional functioning (5 items), social functioning (5 items), and school functioning (5 items). The psychosocial score is a composite of the emotional, social, and school functioning scores. The PedsQL questionnaire was validated previously, is reliable in patient populations [20], and is suggested as a core global outcome measure by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Elements [16]. The second questionnaire was used to determine the persistence of specific neurological symptoms or difficulties with areas of daily living such as weakness, speech, headaches, and seizures, and it covered areas relevant to encephalitis follow-up that were not addressed in the PedsQL questionnaire (see Appendix). The questionnaire was pilot tested with parents of children with chronic medical conditions and modified on the basis of results from this testing.

Statistical Analysis

Summary statistics are reported as medians (interquartile ranges [IQRs]) for continuous data and counts (proportions) for categorical data. The χ2 and Fisher exact tests for association were used to compare certain clinical factors on admission with persistent abnormalities at least 1 year after the diagnosis of encephalitis. Persistent neurological abnormalities were defined as the presence of seizures, behavioral problems, or 1 or more neurological deficits, such as weakness, speech problems, developmental delay, and learning problems. Comparisons for clinical findings at admission and the presence of neurological deficits, behavioral problems, and seizures at discharge were also examined with the χ2 and Fisher exact tests for association. Neurological deficits at discharge were defined as the presence of psychiatric problems or at least 1 physical problem, such as motor deficits, ataxia/cerebellar signs, or movement disorder. Spearman partial correlation was used to measure the strength of the association between PedsQL scores and clinical findings at admission and at discharge while controlling for the effect of age at the time that the survey was administered. The following empirical guidelines for interpreting the magnitude of the correlation coefficients were used: values less than 0.2 indicate weak correlation, values between 0.2 and 0.3 indicate moderate correlation, and values greater than 0.3 indicate large correlation. The McNemar test for paired data was used to test for differences in proportions in abnormalities at admission and during hospitalization against those present at discharge. P values were adjusted for multiple comparisons within each subanalysis by using the Hochberg method, which preserved the overall type I error rate for each subanalysis, allowing the adjusted P values to be interpreted at the 0.05 level of significance. Statistics were performed by using SAS version 9.4 statistical software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

We identified 142 patients with an ICD-9 diagnosis of meningitis, meningoencephalitis, or encephalitis during our study period. Of these patients, 114 met our criteria for a diagnosis of encephalitis and underwent chart review. Twelve patients were excluded because of a diagnosis of anti–N-methyl D-aspartate receptor encephalitis, and 26 patients were excluded because of oncologic comorbidity or insufficient data regarding clinical presentation in the medical record. Seventy-six patients (representing 77 hospitalizations) had data available for review. One patient had a repeat hospitalization for encephalitis 3 years after the initial episode; the etiology was not identified for either presentation. An etiology was identified in 29 (38%) of the cases, 93% of which were from an infectious source. The most common etiologies were HSV, enterovirus, and influenza (Figure 1). The median age at diagnosis was 7 years (IQR, 2–13 years). One patient had a previous history of developmental delay, 1 had a history of seizures, and 2 had a history of migraine. Thirty-two (42%) patients were admitted to the ICU, and 4 (5%) patients died. Neurological deficits present on admission and persistence of deficits at discharge are summarized in Figure 2. Most patients who presented with motor deficits, personality changes, and/or ataxia/cerebellar signs were likely to have resolution of their symptoms before discharge.
Figure 1.

Flow diagram showing study participants with encephalitis at Children's Hospital Colorado (2000–2010), from initial assessment through follow-up. Abbreviations: HSV, herpes simplex virus; ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision.

Figure 1.

Flow diagram showing study participants with encephalitis at Children's Hospital Colorado (2000–2010), from initial assessment through follow-up. Abbreviations: HSV, herpes simplex virus; ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision.

Figure 2.

Neurological deficits and persistence of symptoms and signs on discharge among patients with encephalitis at Children's Hospital Colorado, 2000–2010 (N = 49); significant differences in proportions were evaluated by the χ2 and Fisher exact tests.

Figure 2.

Neurological deficits and persistence of symptoms and signs on discharge among patients with encephalitis at Children's Hospital Colorado, 2000–2010 (N = 49); significant differences in proportions were evaluated by the χ2 and Fisher exact tests.

Forty-nine patients were available for follow-up. The median time to follow-up was 1.3 years. Subjects with and without follow-up data were similar in terms of demographics and clinical characteristics (Table 1). Persistent neurological outcomes and PedsQL scores with normative data [20] are listed in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Persistent deficits were reported in 38 (78%) patients. The most common residual neurological symptoms reported were psychiatric abnormalities, weakness, behavioral or cognitive deficits, vision problems, and headaches. Seventeen patients (35%) reported ongoing seizures. Patients with an etiology identified had lower median physical scores than patients without an etiology identified (87.5 vs 97; P = .02), but their overall and psychosocial scores were not significantly different. Patients with HSV and influenza had lower median physical and psychosocial scores, and patients who tested positive for enterovirus had higher median scores, but these differences were not statistically significant.

Table 1.

Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Hospital Course of Patients With Encephalitis Seen at Children's Hospital Colorado, 2000–2010a

VariableTotal PatientsFollow-Up Group (N = 49)No-Follow-Up Group (N = 27)b
Demographics    
 Age at diagnosis, years; median (interquartile range) 7 (2.6–12.7) 6.8 (2.6–12.8) 7.9 (2.4–11.6) 
 Male 41 (54.0) 25 (51.0) 16 (59.3) 
 Ethnicity/race    
  White 47 (61.8) 31 (63.3) 16 (59.3) 
  White (Hispanic) 19 (24.7) 13 (26.5) 5 (18.5) 
  Black 1 (1.3) 1 (2) 0 (0) 
  Asian 3 (4) 2 (4) 1 (4) 
  Other 3 (4) 0 (0) 3 (11) 
  Unknown 3 (4) 2 (4) 1 (4) 
 Total Episodes of Encephalitis
 
Follow-Up Group (N = 49)
 
No-Follow-Up Group (N = 28)b
 
Clinical presentation/comorbidity    
 Any underlying comorbidity 11 (14.5) 8 (16.7) 3 (10.7) 
 History of recent acute illness 37 (49.3) 21 (44.7) 16 (57.1) 
 Headache 30 (39.3) 22 (44.9) 8 (28.6) 
 Behavioral changes 29 (38.2) 20 (41.7) 9 (32.1) 
 Altered mental status 77 (100) 49 (100) 28 (100) 
 Fever 49 (64) 31 (63.3) 18 (64.3) 
 Seizures 47 (62) 29 (60.4) 18 (64.3) 
 Central nervous system abnormality 33 (43) 23 (46.9) 10 (35.7) 
 At least 1 physical finding 45 (59.2) 29 (60.4) 16 (57.1) 
 Motor deficit 37 (48.7) 23 (47.9) 14 (50.0) 
 Ataxia/cerebellar signs 21 (27.6) 14 (29.2) 7 (25.0) 
 Movement disorder 8 (10.7) 6 (12.8) 2 (7.1) 
 Psychiatric problem 22 (28.9) 16 (33.3) 6 (21.4) 
Laboratory/imaging/EEG findings    
 CSF pleocytosis 61 (80) 40 (83.3) 21 (75.0) 
 MRI/CT abnormalities 39 (51.3) 26 (54.2) 13 (46.4) 
 EEG abnormalities 47 (71.2) 31 (73.8) 16 (66.7) 
Treatment    
 IVIg 5 (6.8) 4 (8.9) 1 (3.6) 
 Steroids 19 (27.5) 11 (25.0) 8 (32.0) 
 <21 days of acyclovir 37 ( 59.7) 19 (51.4) 18 (72.0) 
>21 days of acyclovir 25 (40.3) 18 (48.6) 7 (28.0) 
Hospital course    
 Rehabilitation admission 20 (29.0) 15 (34.1) 5 (20.0) 
 ICU admission 32 (44) 18 (38.3) 14 (56.0) 
 Days in ICU 4 (2–7) 4.5 (2–6) 3.0 (2–7) 
 Length of stay, days; median (interquartile range) 7.0 (3.9–21.0) 7.2 (3.0–21.0) 7.0 (3.9–22.6) 
 Death 4 (5.8) 0 (0) 4 (16) 
Clinical factors on discharge    
 At least 1 physical finding 18 (23.7) 11 (22.9) 7 (25.0) 
 Motor deficit 16 (21.1) 10 (20.8) 6 (21.4) 
 Ataxia/cerebellar signs 4 (5.3) 2 (4.2) 2 (7.1) 
 Movement disorder 3 (4) 1 (2.1) 2 (7.1) 
 Psychiatric problem 8 (10.5) 5 (10.4) 3 (10.7) 
VariableTotal PatientsFollow-Up Group (N = 49)No-Follow-Up Group (N = 27)b
Demographics    
 Age at diagnosis, years; median (interquartile range) 7 (2.6–12.7) 6.8 (2.6–12.8) 7.9 (2.4–11.6) 
 Male 41 (54.0) 25 (51.0) 16 (59.3) 
 Ethnicity/race    
  White 47 (61.8) 31 (63.3) 16 (59.3) 
  White (Hispanic) 19 (24.7) 13 (26.5) 5 (18.5) 
  Black 1 (1.3) 1 (2) 0 (0) 
  Asian 3 (4) 2 (4) 1 (4) 
  Other 3 (4) 0 (0) 3 (11) 
  Unknown 3 (4) 2 (4) 1 (4) 
 Total Episodes of Encephalitis
 
Follow-Up Group (N = 49)
 
No-Follow-Up Group (N = 28)b
 
Clinical presentation/comorbidity    
 Any underlying comorbidity 11 (14.5) 8 (16.7) 3 (10.7) 
 History of recent acute illness 37 (49.3) 21 (44.7) 16 (57.1) 
 Headache 30 (39.3) 22 (44.9) 8 (28.6) 
 Behavioral changes 29 (38.2) 20 (41.7) 9 (32.1) 
 Altered mental status 77 (100) 49 (100) 28 (100) 
 Fever 49 (64) 31 (63.3) 18 (64.3) 
 Seizures 47 (62) 29 (60.4) 18 (64.3) 
 Central nervous system abnormality 33 (43) 23 (46.9) 10 (35.7) 
 At least 1 physical finding 45 (59.2) 29 (60.4) 16 (57.1) 
 Motor deficit 37 (48.7) 23 (47.9) 14 (50.0) 
 Ataxia/cerebellar signs 21 (27.6) 14 (29.2) 7 (25.0) 
 Movement disorder 8 (10.7) 6 (12.8) 2 (7.1) 
 Psychiatric problem 22 (28.9) 16 (33.3) 6 (21.4) 
Laboratory/imaging/EEG findings    
 CSF pleocytosis 61 (80) 40 (83.3) 21 (75.0) 
 MRI/CT abnormalities 39 (51.3) 26 (54.2) 13 (46.4) 
 EEG abnormalities 47 (71.2) 31 (73.8) 16 (66.7) 
Treatment    
 IVIg 5 (6.8) 4 (8.9) 1 (3.6) 
 Steroids 19 (27.5) 11 (25.0) 8 (32.0) 
 <21 days of acyclovir 37 ( 59.7) 19 (51.4) 18 (72.0) 
>21 days of acyclovir 25 (40.3) 18 (48.6) 7 (28.0) 
Hospital course    
 Rehabilitation admission 20 (29.0) 15 (34.1) 5 (20.0) 
 ICU admission 32 (44) 18 (38.3) 14 (56.0) 
 Days in ICU 4 (2–7) 4.5 (2–6) 3.0 (2–7) 
 Length of stay, days; median (interquartile range) 7.0 (3.9–21.0) 7.2 (3.0–21.0) 7.0 (3.9–22.6) 
 Death 4 (5.8) 0 (0) 4 (16) 
Clinical factors on discharge    
 At least 1 physical finding 18 (23.7) 11 (22.9) 7 (25.0) 
 Motor deficit 16 (21.1) 10 (20.8) 6 (21.4) 
 Ataxia/cerebellar signs 4 (5.3) 2 (4.2) 2 (7.1) 
 Movement disorder 3 (4) 1 (2.1) 2 (7.1) 
 Psychiatric problem 8 (10.5) 5 (10.4) 3 (10.7) 

Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CT, computed tomography; EEG, electroencephalography; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

a Values shown are number (percentage) unless otherwise specified.

b There was no statistically significant difference between the follow-up and no-follow-up groups.

Table 1.

Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Hospital Course of Patients With Encephalitis Seen at Children's Hospital Colorado, 2000–2010a

VariableTotal PatientsFollow-Up Group (N = 49)No-Follow-Up Group (N = 27)b
Demographics    
 Age at diagnosis, years; median (interquartile range) 7 (2.6–12.7) 6.8 (2.6–12.8) 7.9 (2.4–11.6) 
 Male 41 (54.0) 25 (51.0) 16 (59.3) 
 Ethnicity/race    
  White 47 (61.8) 31 (63.3) 16 (59.3) 
  White (Hispanic) 19 (24.7) 13 (26.5) 5 (18.5) 
  Black 1 (1.3) 1 (2) 0 (0) 
  Asian 3 (4) 2 (4) 1 (4) 
  Other 3 (4) 0 (0) 3 (11) 
  Unknown 3 (4) 2 (4) 1 (4) 
 Total Episodes of Encephalitis
 
Follow-Up Group (N = 49)
 
No-Follow-Up Group (N = 28)b
 
Clinical presentation/comorbidity    
 Any underlying comorbidity 11 (14.5) 8 (16.7) 3 (10.7) 
 History of recent acute illness 37 (49.3) 21 (44.7) 16 (57.1) 
 Headache 30 (39.3) 22 (44.9) 8 (28.6) 
 Behavioral changes 29 (38.2) 20 (41.7) 9 (32.1) 
 Altered mental status 77 (100) 49 (100) 28 (100) 
 Fever 49 (64) 31 (63.3) 18 (64.3) 
 Seizures 47 (62) 29 (60.4) 18 (64.3) 
 Central nervous system abnormality 33 (43) 23 (46.9) 10 (35.7) 
 At least 1 physical finding 45 (59.2) 29 (60.4) 16 (57.1) 
 Motor deficit 37 (48.7) 23 (47.9) 14 (50.0) 
 Ataxia/cerebellar signs 21 (27.6) 14 (29.2) 7 (25.0) 
 Movement disorder 8 (10.7) 6 (12.8) 2 (7.1) 
 Psychiatric problem 22 (28.9) 16 (33.3) 6 (21.4) 
Laboratory/imaging/EEG findings    
 CSF pleocytosis 61 (80) 40 (83.3) 21 (75.0) 
 MRI/CT abnormalities 39 (51.3) 26 (54.2) 13 (46.4) 
 EEG abnormalities 47 (71.2) 31 (73.8) 16 (66.7) 
Treatment    
 IVIg 5 (6.8) 4 (8.9) 1 (3.6) 
 Steroids 19 (27.5) 11 (25.0) 8 (32.0) 
 <21 days of acyclovir 37 ( 59.7) 19 (51.4) 18 (72.0) 
>21 days of acyclovir 25 (40.3) 18 (48.6) 7 (28.0) 
Hospital course    
 Rehabilitation admission 20 (29.0) 15 (34.1) 5 (20.0) 
 ICU admission 32 (44) 18 (38.3) 14 (56.0) 
 Days in ICU 4 (2–7) 4.5 (2–6) 3.0 (2–7) 
 Length of stay, days; median (interquartile range) 7.0 (3.9–21.0) 7.2 (3.0–21.0) 7.0 (3.9–22.6) 
 Death 4 (5.8) 0 (0) 4 (16) 
Clinical factors on discharge    
 At least 1 physical finding 18 (23.7) 11 (22.9) 7 (25.0) 
 Motor deficit 16 (21.1) 10 (20.8) 6 (21.4) 
 Ataxia/cerebellar signs 4 (5.3) 2 (4.2) 2 (7.1) 
 Movement disorder 3 (4) 1 (2.1) 2 (7.1) 
 Psychiatric problem 8 (10.5) 5 (10.4) 3 (10.7) 
VariableTotal PatientsFollow-Up Group (N = 49)No-Follow-Up Group (N = 27)b
Demographics    
 Age at diagnosis, years; median (interquartile range) 7 (2.6–12.7) 6.8 (2.6–12.8) 7.9 (2.4–11.6) 
 Male 41 (54.0) 25 (51.0) 16 (59.3) 
 Ethnicity/race    
  White 47 (61.8) 31 (63.3) 16 (59.3) 
  White (Hispanic) 19 (24.7) 13 (26.5) 5 (18.5) 
  Black 1 (1.3) 1 (2) 0 (0) 
  Asian 3 (4) 2 (4) 1 (4) 
  Other 3 (4) 0 (0) 3 (11) 
  Unknown 3 (4) 2 (4) 1 (4) 
 Total Episodes of Encephalitis
 
Follow-Up Group (N = 49)
 
No-Follow-Up Group (N = 28)b
 
Clinical presentation/comorbidity    
 Any underlying comorbidity 11 (14.5) 8 (16.7) 3 (10.7) 
 History of recent acute illness 37 (49.3) 21 (44.7) 16 (57.1) 
 Headache 30 (39.3) 22 (44.9) 8 (28.6) 
 Behavioral changes 29 (38.2) 20 (41.7) 9 (32.1) 
 Altered mental status 77 (100) 49 (100) 28 (100) 
 Fever 49 (64) 31 (63.3) 18 (64.3) 
 Seizures 47 (62) 29 (60.4) 18 (64.3) 
 Central nervous system abnormality 33 (43) 23 (46.9) 10 (35.7) 
 At least 1 physical finding 45 (59.2) 29 (60.4) 16 (57.1) 
 Motor deficit 37 (48.7) 23 (47.9) 14 (50.0) 
 Ataxia/cerebellar signs 21 (27.6) 14 (29.2) 7 (25.0) 
 Movement disorder 8 (10.7) 6 (12.8) 2 (7.1) 
 Psychiatric problem 22 (28.9) 16 (33.3) 6 (21.4) 
Laboratory/imaging/EEG findings    
 CSF pleocytosis 61 (80) 40 (83.3) 21 (75.0) 
 MRI/CT abnormalities 39 (51.3) 26 (54.2) 13 (46.4) 
 EEG abnormalities 47 (71.2) 31 (73.8) 16 (66.7) 
Treatment    
 IVIg 5 (6.8) 4 (8.9) 1 (3.6) 
 Steroids 19 (27.5) 11 (25.0) 8 (32.0) 
 <21 days of acyclovir 37 ( 59.7) 19 (51.4) 18 (72.0) 
>21 days of acyclovir 25 (40.3) 18 (48.6) 7 (28.0) 
Hospital course    
 Rehabilitation admission 20 (29.0) 15 (34.1) 5 (20.0) 
 ICU admission 32 (44) 18 (38.3) 14 (56.0) 
 Days in ICU 4 (2–7) 4.5 (2–6) 3.0 (2–7) 
 Length of stay, days; median (interquartile range) 7.0 (3.9–21.0) 7.2 (3.0–21.0) 7.0 (3.9–22.6) 
 Death 4 (5.8) 0 (0) 4 (16) 
Clinical factors on discharge    
 At least 1 physical finding 18 (23.7) 11 (22.9) 7 (25.0) 
 Motor deficit 16 (21.1) 10 (20.8) 6 (21.4) 
 Ataxia/cerebellar signs 4 (5.3) 2 (4.2) 2 (7.1) 
 Movement disorder 3 (4) 1 (2.1) 2 (7.1) 
 Psychiatric problem 8 (10.5) 5 (10.4) 3 (10.7) 

Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CT, computed tomography; EEG, electroencephalography; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

a Values shown are number (percentage) unless otherwise specified.

b There was no statistically significant difference between the follow-up and no-follow-up groups.

Table 2.

Persistent Neurological Deficits at Least 1 Year After Diagnosis of Encephalitis Among Patients Seen at Children's Hospital Colorado, 2000–2010 (N = 49)

Variablen% (95% CI)
Neurological deficit   
 Any deficit 38 78 (66–90) 
 Weakness 16 33 (20–46) 
 Behavioral problem 15 31 (18–44) 
 Developmental delay 17 35 (22–48) 
 Anxiety/depression 18 37 (23–51) 
 Vision problem 17 35 (22–48) 
 Speech problem 15 31 (18–44) 
 Sleep problem 18 (7–29) 
 Learning problem 20 41 (27–55) 
 Swallowing problem 10 (2–18) 
 Hearing problem 6 (0–13) 
 Headache 17 35 (22–48) 
 Seizures 17 35 (22–48) 
Services/aids/medications required 
 On antiepileptic(s) 12 24 (12–36) 
 Glasses 13 27 (15–39) 
 Hearing aid 2 (0–6) 
 Speech therapy 24 49 (35–63) 
 Physical therapy 24 49 (35–63) 
 Occupational therapy 24 49 (35–63) 
Variablen% (95% CI)
Neurological deficit   
 Any deficit 38 78 (66–90) 
 Weakness 16 33 (20–46) 
 Behavioral problem 15 31 (18–44) 
 Developmental delay 17 35 (22–48) 
 Anxiety/depression 18 37 (23–51) 
 Vision problem 17 35 (22–48) 
 Speech problem 15 31 (18–44) 
 Sleep problem 18 (7–29) 
 Learning problem 20 41 (27–55) 
 Swallowing problem 10 (2–18) 
 Hearing problem 6 (0–13) 
 Headache 17 35 (22–48) 
 Seizures 17 35 (22–48) 
Services/aids/medications required 
 On antiepileptic(s) 12 24 (12–36) 
 Glasses 13 27 (15–39) 
 Hearing aid 2 (0–6) 
 Speech therapy 24 49 (35–63) 
 Physical therapy 24 49 (35–63) 
 Occupational therapy 24 49 (35–63) 

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Table 2.

Persistent Neurological Deficits at Least 1 Year After Diagnosis of Encephalitis Among Patients Seen at Children's Hospital Colorado, 2000–2010 (N = 49)

Variablen% (95% CI)
Neurological deficit   
 Any deficit 38 78 (66–90) 
 Weakness 16 33 (20–46) 
 Behavioral problem 15 31 (18–44) 
 Developmental delay 17 35 (22–48) 
 Anxiety/depression 18 37 (23–51) 
 Vision problem 17 35 (22–48) 
 Speech problem 15 31 (18–44) 
 Sleep problem 18 (7–29) 
 Learning problem 20 41 (27–55) 
 Swallowing problem 10 (2–18) 
 Hearing problem 6 (0–13) 
 Headache 17 35 (22–48) 
 Seizures 17 35 (22–48) 
Services/aids/medications required 
 On antiepileptic(s) 12 24 (12–36) 
 Glasses 13 27 (15–39) 
 Hearing aid 2 (0–6) 
 Speech therapy 24 49 (35–63) 
 Physical therapy 24 49 (35–63) 
 Occupational therapy 24 49 (35–63) 
Variablen% (95% CI)
Neurological deficit   
 Any deficit 38 78 (66–90) 
 Weakness 16 33 (20–46) 
 Behavioral problem 15 31 (18–44) 
 Developmental delay 17 35 (22–48) 
 Anxiety/depression 18 37 (23–51) 
 Vision problem 17 35 (22–48) 
 Speech problem 15 31 (18–44) 
 Sleep problem 18 (7–29) 
 Learning problem 20 41 (27–55) 
 Swallowing problem 10 (2–18) 
 Hearing problem 6 (0–13) 
 Headache 17 35 (22–48) 
 Seizures 17 35 (22–48) 
Services/aids/medications required 
 On antiepileptic(s) 12 24 (12–36) 
 Glasses 13 27 (15–39) 
 Hearing aid 2 (0–6) 
 Speech therapy 24 49 (35–63) 
 Physical therapy 24 49 (35–63) 
 Occupational therapy 24 49 (35–63) 

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Table 3.

PedsQL Scores for Patients at Least 1 Year After Diagnosis of Encephalitis Among Patients Seen at Children's Hospital Colorado, 2000–2010 (N = 49)

Age CategoryPedsQL Score (Median [IQR])
Physicala 94 (75–100) 
 2–4 y of age 95 (53–100) 
 5–7 y of age 97 (30–100) 
 8–12 y of age 89 (63–97) 
 >13 y of age 94 (88–100) 
Psychosociala 75 (60–92) 
 2–4 y of age 73 (56–100) 
 5–7 y of age 76 (56–91) 
 8–12 y of age 78 (62–93) 
 >13 y of age 75 (60–79) 
Age CategoryPedsQL Score (Median [IQR])
Physicala 94 (75–100) 
 2–4 y of age 95 (53–100) 
 5–7 y of age 97 (30–100) 
 8–12 y of age 89 (63–97) 
 >13 y of age 94 (88–100) 
Psychosociala 75 (60–92) 
 2–4 y of age 73 (56–100) 
 5–7 y of age 76 (56–91) 
 8–12 y of age 78 (62–93) 
 >13 y of age 75 (60–79) 

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; PedsQL, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory; SD, standard deviation.

a Parent proxy-report mean scores for PedsQL physical health among 8696 families of healthy children were 84.08 (SD, 19.7), and mean scores for psychosocial health among 8714 families were 81.24 (SD, 15.34) in a study by Varni et al [20].

Table 3.

PedsQL Scores for Patients at Least 1 Year After Diagnosis of Encephalitis Among Patients Seen at Children's Hospital Colorado, 2000–2010 (N = 49)

Age CategoryPedsQL Score (Median [IQR])
Physicala 94 (75–100) 
 2–4 y of age 95 (53–100) 
 5–7 y of age 97 (30–100) 
 8–12 y of age 89 (63–97) 
 >13 y of age 94 (88–100) 
Psychosociala 75 (60–92) 
 2–4 y of age 73 (56–100) 
 5–7 y of age 76 (56–91) 
 8–12 y of age 78 (62–93) 
 >13 y of age 75 (60–79) 
Age CategoryPedsQL Score (Median [IQR])
Physicala 94 (75–100) 
 2–4 y of age 95 (53–100) 
 5–7 y of age 97 (30–100) 
 8–12 y of age 89 (63–97) 
 >13 y of age 94 (88–100) 
Psychosociala 75 (60–92) 
 2–4 y of age 73 (56–100) 
 5–7 y of age 76 (56–91) 
 8–12 y of age 78 (62–93) 
 >13 y of age 75 (60–79) 

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; PedsQL, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory; SD, standard deviation.

a Parent proxy-report mean scores for PedsQL physical health among 8696 families of healthy children were 84.08 (SD, 19.7), and mean scores for psychosocial health among 8714 families were 81.24 (SD, 15.34) in a study by Varni et al [20].

There were no significant associations observed between factors on admission, such as CSF pleocytosis, CT/MRI or EEG abnormalities, or neurological deficits present at discharge. Patients admitted to the ICU were more likely to have had EEG abnormalities (P = .013).

Long-term outcomes were assessed by evaluating the PedsQL scores and the presence of neurological symptoms and signs at least 1 year after diagnosis. Having seizures present on admission was significantly associated with ongoing seizures at least 1 year after the diagnosis of encephalitis (94% vs 42%; P = .0036). Partial correlation coefficients of clinical factors on admission with PedsQL scores at least 1 year after diagnosis are presented in Table 4. After removing the effects of age, having abnormal MRI results on admission was associated with lower psychosocial and physical scores, and the presence of seizures on admission correlated with lower physical scores. The presence of EEG abnormalities on admission did not correlate with PedsQL scores. However, an increase in the number of clinical factors on admission (MRI abnormalities, EEG abnormalities, seizures, and CSF pleocytosis) correlated with lower PedsQL scores.

Table 4.

Partial Correlations of PedsQL Scores (Obtained at Least 1 Year After Diagnosis) With Clinical Factors on Admission After Adjusting for Age Among Patients With Encephalitis Seen at Children's Hospital Colorado, 2000–2010

Clinical Factor on AdmissionnPhysical Score
Psychosocial Score
Overall Score
MedianSpearman rhoaMedianSpearman rhoaMedianSpearman rhoa
MRI/CT        
 Abnormal 26 71.9 –0.26 88.8 –0.43b 76.5 –0.29 
 Normal 22 77.4  100  81.4  
EEG        
 Abnormal 31 73.3 0.05 90.6 −0.14 76.2 0.06 
 Normal 11 75.0  100  80.0  
Seizures        
 Yes 29 75.0 −0.08 90.6 –0.2 76.3 −0.11 
 No 19 87.5  96.9  85.0  
CSF pleocytosis        
 Yes 40 75.0 −0.16 93.8 0.05 78.0 −0.09 
 No 85.8  94.4  84.6  
No. of clinical factors present        
 1 10 92.5 –0.24 100 –0.34 92.1 –0.22 
 2 14 76.9  93.8  74.2  
 3 12 65.3  98.4  68.3  
 4 13 76.3  87.5  72.9  
Clinical Factor on AdmissionnPhysical Score
Psychosocial Score
Overall Score
MedianSpearman rhoaMedianSpearman rhoaMedianSpearman rhoa
MRI/CT        
 Abnormal 26 71.9 –0.26 88.8 –0.43b 76.5 –0.29 
 Normal 22 77.4  100  81.4  
EEG        
 Abnormal 31 73.3 0.05 90.6 −0.14 76.2 0.06 
 Normal 11 75.0  100  80.0  
Seizures        
 Yes 29 75.0 −0.08 90.6 –0.2 76.3 −0.11 
 No 19 87.5  96.9  85.0  
CSF pleocytosis        
 Yes 40 75.0 −0.16 93.8 0.05 78.0 −0.09 
 No 85.8  94.4  84.6  
No. of clinical factors present        
 1 10 92.5 –0.24 100 –0.34 92.1 –0.22 
 2 14 76.9  93.8  74.2  
 3 12 65.3  98.4  68.3  
 4 13 76.3  87.5  72.9  

Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CT, computed tomography; EEG, electroencephalography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PedsQL, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory.

a Values of 0.1–0.2 represent weak correlation; values of 0.2–0.3 represent moderate correlation; and values of >0.3 represent strong correlation.

b The adjusted P value is <.05.

Table 4.

Partial Correlations of PedsQL Scores (Obtained at Least 1 Year After Diagnosis) With Clinical Factors on Admission After Adjusting for Age Among Patients With Encephalitis Seen at Children's Hospital Colorado, 2000–2010

Clinical Factor on AdmissionnPhysical Score
Psychosocial Score
Overall Score
MedianSpearman rhoaMedianSpearman rhoaMedianSpearman rhoa
MRI/CT        
 Abnormal 26 71.9 –0.26 88.8 –0.43b 76.5 –0.29 
 Normal 22 77.4  100  81.4  
EEG        
 Abnormal 31 73.3 0.05 90.6 −0.14 76.2 0.06 
 Normal 11 75.0  100  80.0  
Seizures        
 Yes 29 75.0 −0.08 90.6 –0.2 76.3 −0.11 
 No 19 87.5  96.9  85.0  
CSF pleocytosis        
 Yes 40 75.0 −0.16 93.8 0.05 78.0 −0.09 
 No 85.8  94.4  84.6  
No. of clinical factors present        
 1 10 92.5 –0.24 100 –0.34 92.1 –0.22 
 2 14 76.9  93.8  74.2  
 3 12 65.3  98.4  68.3  
 4 13 76.3  87.5  72.9  
Clinical Factor on AdmissionnPhysical Score
Psychosocial Score
Overall Score
MedianSpearman rhoaMedianSpearman rhoaMedianSpearman rhoa
MRI/CT        
 Abnormal 26 71.9 –0.26 88.8 –0.43b 76.5 –0.29 
 Normal 22 77.4  100  81.4  
EEG        
 Abnormal 31 73.3 0.05 90.6 −0.14 76.2 0.06 
 Normal 11 75.0  100  80.0  
Seizures        
 Yes 29 75.0 −0.08 90.6 –0.2 76.3 −0.11 
 No 19 87.5  96.9  85.0  
CSF pleocytosis        
 Yes 40 75.0 −0.16 93.8 0.05 78.0 −0.09 
 No 85.8  94.4  84.6  
No. of clinical factors present        
 1 10 92.5 –0.24 100 –0.34 92.1 –0.22 
 2 14 76.9  93.8  74.2  
 3 12 65.3  98.4  68.3  
 4 13 76.3  87.5  72.9  

Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CT, computed tomography; EEG, electroencephalography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PedsQL, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory.

a Values of 0.1–0.2 represent weak correlation; values of 0.2–0.3 represent moderate correlation; and values of >0.3 represent strong correlation.

b The adjusted P value is <.05.

DISCUSSION

In our study of long-term outcomes of children with encephalitis, we found that almost 80% of patients with encephalitis had persistent neurological symptoms on long-term follow-up. MRI findings and the presence/absence of seizures on admission were helpful in predicting long-term outcomes. We found that abnormal MRI findings and seizures were correlated with lower quality-of-life scores. The presence of seizures at presentation was associated with patients having ongoing seizure disorder. Finally, although EEG abnormalities were more commonly seen among critically ill patients, EEG findings were not helpful in predicting long-term outcomes. Given the limited data regarding long-term outcomes in children with encephalitis, these findings are important for informing which factors on presentation might predict quality-of-life outcomes.

The results of our study suggest a role for MRI for not only diagnosing and assisting with the etiology of encephalitis but also the prognostic information it may provide. Although abnormal MRI findings in our study were not associated with findings at discharge or gross neurological deficits, they were potentially associated with more subtle deficits identified by the PedsQL questionnaire. The strongest correlation was noted for the psychosocial score, which evaluates mental and emotional health and incorporates perception of self and ability to function in the community. Klein et al [2] reported that MRI abnormalities were predictive of abnormal neurological outcome at hospital discharge, but their study did not follow patients to assess long-term outcomes. Wang et al [3] reported that focal cortical parenchymal abnormalities that appeared on MRI predicted poorer long-term outcomes. Despite having detailed radiographic characterization of the lesions in those patients with MRI abnormalities, our study did not find an association between specific MRI abnormalities and adverse outcome, but this finding might have been limited by sample size.

In contrast, although EEG is a useful tool for assessing acute brain dysfunction [4], EEG findings do not predict long-term outcomes. The results of our study show that any EEG abnormalities, particularly severe EEG findings, were more prevalent in patients admitted to the pediatric ICU. We did not, however, find an independent association between EEG abnormalities or ICU stay and poor long-term outcomes, in contrast to the findings of Wang et al [3]. Our findings suggest that patients who present with more severe clinical signs and symptoms at presentation are more likely to have EEG abnormalities, but they do not necessarily correlate with long-term outcomes.

Although EEG findings may not be useful for prognosis, our study results show that seizures on initial presentation correlated with poorer long-term outcomes, which has been corroborated by other reports [2, 3]. From their study, Misra et al [21] reported that seizures resulting from encephalitis were associated with poor outcomes at 3 months’ follow-up. The study did not identify specific outcome domains as we did. It should be noted that the most common etiological agents reported by Misra et al, specifically, Japanese encephalitis and dengue, were different than those in our study. In addition, our finding that the presence of seizures at presentation increased the risk of subsequent seizure disorder was described previously [4]. These findings raise questions about whether identifying and optimizing seizure management early in the hospital course could serve as a neuroprotective strategy, and they warrant further study.

The majority of previous studies in which long-term outcomes of patients with encephalitis were explored focused on a specific etiological agent [7, 11, 13, 14, 22]. However, given that the majority of cases of encephalitis are without an etiology, we sought to explore the long-term outcomes of encephalitis regardless of whether an agent was identified, because it is more relevant to the usual clinical setting. We found that the identification of an etiological agent did not influence quality-of-life scores, but our data are limited by the lack of standardized testing at our institution.

Although other studies have explored short-term outcomes during hospitalizations [2] or focused primarily on long-term outcomes [23, 24], a strength of our study is that we report both long-term and short-term outcomes. In addition to reporting initial presentation and outcomes at discharge, we sought to follow patients at least 1 year after their initial diagnosis of encephalitis, by which time their deficits are usually persistent [25]. We selected the PedsQL questionnaire for our study because it was validated for use in studies of neurological disorders, it is brief and reliable, and it can be administered by telephone, which likely contributed to our high response rate. Because this tool does not account for specific deficits, we included an additional questionnaire related to neurological deficits, which provided further insight into the long-term morbidity associated with encephalitis.

There are limitations to our study. Our study showed an increase in the number of deficits correlated with lower physical, psychosocial, and overall PedsQL scores. However, we were not able to determine whether they were independent predictors because of our small sample size. There was a significant percentage of patients excluded from analysis because of incomplete medical records, which may have skewed our data. Selection bias exists because of the nature of our follow-up. Also, there were variable times to patient follow-up for the completion of the questionnaires. However, because most patients with encephalitis who show full recovery are likely to do so within 12 months of their initial diagnosis [4], we ensured that follow-up was obtained at least 1 year after their diagnosis, by which time their clinical characteristics were more likely to be persistent. In addition, there are certain neurological deficits that are nonspecific and may not be related to encephalitis (such as the presence of headaches) or may have been present before the diagnosis of encephalitis. We documented in our detailed questionnaire only those symptoms that were new after the diagnosis of encephalitis, but reporting was subject to recall bias and may have influenced the PedsQL scores. A prospective longitudinal study that includes active methods of subject follow-up and formal neuropsychological assessments linking early indicators to etiology, disease progression, and prognosis would yield an improved understanding of long-term outcomes.

This study of long-term outcomes of patients hospitalized with encephalitis found that long-term deficits are seen in approximately 80% of patients, and subsequent seizure disorder is seen in 35% of patients. Abnormal MRI findings at presentation correlate with worse quality-of-life outcomes. The presence of seizures on presentation predicts subsequent seizure disorder and is associated also with lower physical quality-of-life scores. Our data suggest that MRI findings might provide some prognostic information. Close follow-up of these patients is advised, because they are at risk of impairment with regards to their quality of life and subsequent epilepsy. Additional prospective studies with larger cohorts and more detailed outcome measures are needed to further determine risk factors that are predictive of poor outcomes.

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts.

All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

1

Tunkel
AR
,
Glaser
CA
,
Bloch
KC
et al.  .
The management of encephalitis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America
.
Clin Infect Dis
2008
;
47
:
303
27
.

2

Klein
SK
,
Hom
DL
,
Anderson
MR
,
Latrizza
AT
,
Toltzis
P
.
Predictive factors of short-term neurologic outcome in children with encephalitis
.
Pediatr Neurol
1994
;
11
:
308
12
.

3

Wang
IJ
,
Lee
PI
,
Huang
LM
et al.  .
The correlation between neurological evaluations and neurological outcome in acute encephalitis: a hospital-based study
.
Eur J Paediatr Neurol
2007
;
11
:
63
9
.

4

Fowler
A
,
Stodberg
T
,
Eriksson
M
,
Wickstrom
R
.
Childhood encephalitis in Sweden: etiology, clinical presentation and outcome
.
Eur J Paediatr Neurol
2008
;
12
:
484
90
.

5

Clarke
M
,
Newton
RW
,
Klapper
PE
et al.  .
Childhood encephalopathy: viruses, immune response, and outcome
.
Dev Med Child Neurol
2006
;
48
:
294
300
.

6

Rautonen
J
,
Koskiniemi
M
,
Vaheri
A
.
Prognostic factors in childhood acute encephalitis
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
1991
;
10
:
441
6
.

7

Elbers
JM
,
Bitnun
A
,
Richardson
SE
et al.  .
A 12-year prospective study of childhood herpes simplex encephalitis: is there a broader spectrum of disease
?
Pediatrics
2007
;
119
:
e399
407
.

8

Corey
L
,
Whitley
RJ
,
Stone
EF
,
Mohan
K
.
Difference between herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 neonatal encephalitis in neurological outcome
.
Lancet
1988
;
1
:
1
4
.

9

Whitley
R
,
Arvin
A
,
Prober
C
et al.  .
Predictors of morbidity and mortality in neonates with herpes simplex virus infections. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group
.
N Eng J Med
1991
;
324
:
450
4
.

10

Kimberlin
DW
,
Lin
CY
,
Jacobs
RF
et al.  .
Natural history of neonatal herpes simplex virus infections in the acyclovir era
.
Pediatrics
2001
;
108
:
223
9
.

11

Ooi
MH
,
Lewthwaite
P
,
Lai
BF
et al.  .
The epidemiology, clinical features, and long-term prognosis of Japanese encephalitis in central Sarawak, Malaysia, 1997–2005
.
Clin Infect Dis
2008
;
47
:
458
68
.

12

Huang
MC
,
Wang
SM
,
Hsu
YW
et al.  .
Long-term cognitive and motor deficits after enterovirus 71 brainstem encephalitis in children
.
Pediatrics
2006
;
118
:
e1785
8
.

13

Chang
LY
,
Hsia
SH
,
Wu
CT
et al.  .
Outcome of enterovirus 71 infections with or without stage-based management: 1998 to 2002
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
2004
;
23
:
327
32
.

14

Doja
A
,
Bitnun
A
,
Jones
EL
et al.  .
Pediatric Epstein-Barr virus-associated encephalitis: 10-year review
.
J Child Neurol
2006
;
21
:
385
91
.

15

Koskiniemi
M
,
Korppi
M
,
Mustonen
K
et al.  .
Epidemiology of encephalitis in children. A prospective multicentre study
.
Eur J Pediatr
1997
;
156
:
541
5
.

16

McCauley
SR
,
Wilde
EA
,
Anderson
VA
et al.  .
Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in pediatric traumatic brain injury research
.
J Neurotrauma
2012
;
29
:
678
705
.

17

Di Battista
A
,
Godfrey
C
,
Soo
C
,
Catroppa
C
,
Anderson
V
.
Does what we measure matter? Quality-of-life defined by adolescents with brain injury
.
Brain Inj
2015
;
29
:
1
10
.

18

Kolski
H
,
Ford-Jones
EL
,
Richardson
S
et al.  .
Etiology of acute childhood encephalitis at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, 1994–1995
.
Clin Infect Dis
1998
;
26
:
398
409
.

19

The PedsQL Measurement Model for the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Available at: http://www.pedsql.org/
.
Accessed April 15, 2015
.

20

Varni
JW
,
Limbers
CA
,
Neighbors
K
et al.  .
The PedsQL infant scales: feasibility, internal consistency reliability, and validity in healthy and ill infants
.
Qual Life Res
2011
;
20
:
45
55
.

21

Misra
UK
,
Kalita
J
.
Seizures in encephalitis: predictors and outcome
.
Seizure
2009
;
18
:
583
7
.

22

Engman
ML
,
Adolfsson
I
,
Lewensohn-Fuchs
I
et al.  .
Neuropsychologic outcomes in children with neonatal herpes encephalitis
.
Pediatr Neurol
2008
;
38
:
398
405
.

23

Schmidt
A
,
Buhler
R
,
Muhlemann
K
,
Hess
CW
,
Tauber
MG
.
Long-term outcome of acute encephalitis of unknown aetiology in adults
.
Clin Microbiol Infect
2011
;
17
:
621
6
.

24

Mailles
A
,
De Broucker
T
,
Costanzo
P
et al.  .
Long-term outcome of patients presenting with acute infectious encephalitis of various causes in France
.
Clin Infect Dis
2012
;
54
:
1455
64
.

25

Fowler
A
,
Stodberg
T
,
Eriksson
M
,
Wickstrom
R
.
Long-term outcomes of acute encephalitis in childhood
.
Pediatrics
2010
;
126
:
e828
35
.

APPENDIX

TCH Neurological Outcomes Questionnaire

Child's Name:

Date of Birth:

Your Name:

Relationship to child:

General health:

In general, would you say your child's health is:

Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor 
Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor 

Have you been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that your child has any of the following problems?

  • Weakness of the arms or legs

 
no yes 
  • Behavior problems

 
no yes 
  • Developmental delay

 
no yes 
  • Depression or anxiety problems

 
no yes 
  • Vision problems

 
no yes 
  • Speech problems

 
no yes 
  • Sleep disturbance

 
no yes 
  • Learning problems

 
no yes 
  • Swallowing problems

 
no yes 
  • Hearing problems or deafness

 
no yes 
  • Headaches

 
no yes 
  • Weakness of the arms or legs

 
no yes 
  • Behavior problems

 
no yes 
  • Developmental delay

 
no yes 
  • Depression or anxiety problems

 
no yes 
  • Vision problems

 
no yes 
  • Speech problems

 
no yes 
  • Sleep disturbance

 
no yes 
  • Learning problems

 
no yes 
  • Swallowing problems

 
no yes 
  • Hearing problems or deafness

 
no yes 
  • Headaches

 
no yes 

If you have answered yes to any of the above, was this present before the diagnosis of encephalitis? If so, please circle:

Since your child's encephalitis, does he or she currently:

  • Use a wheelchair?

 
no yes 
  • Wear glasses?

 
no yes 
  • Wear hearing aids?

 
no yes 
  • Use a wheelchair?

 
no yes 
  • Wear glasses?

 
no yes 
  • Wear hearing aids?

 
no yes 

Has your child ever needed any of the following services after discharge from a hospital for encephalitis?

  • Speech therapy

 
no yes 
  • Occupational therapy

 
no yes 
  • Physical therapy

 
no yes 
  • Speech therapy

 
no yes 
  • Occupational therapy

 
no yes 
  • Physical therapy

 
no yes 

Seizures:

2. Does your child have seizures since having encephalitis? no yes 
2. Does your child have seizures since having encephalitis? no yes 

If the answer is yes, answer questions 3–5 below:

3. What best describes the type of seizure pattern your child has:

  • Staring episodes

 
  • Focal seizures (affecting one part of the body)

 
  • Generalized seizures (affecting multiple parts of the body)

 
  • Other (describe)

 
  • Staring episodes

 
  • Focal seizures (affecting one part of the body)

 
  • Generalized seizures (affecting multiple parts of the body)

 
  • Other (describe)

 

4. During the past 4 weeks, how many seizures has your child had?

5. Does your child take medication(s) for the seizures? no yes 
5. Does your child take medication(s) for the seizures? no yes 

Author notes

Correspondence: S. Rao, MBBS, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, B055, 13123 E 16th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045 (suchitra.rao@childrenscolorado.org).