Abstract

Background

The aims of this study are to examine the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with metabolic syndrome (MS) and to investigate the association between CKD and MS after adjustment for socioeconomic position and health behavior factor.

Methods

The random sample used in this study included 5136 Korean subjects ≥20 years of age. We divided the subjects into two groups based on the presence of MS, for which the criteria described in the NCEP ATP III and International Diabetes Federation were used. Also, CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2.

Results

The prevalence of CKD in our study was 6.8%. The age-adjusted prevalence of CKD among those with MS was 9.0% whereas those without MS was 5.6%. After adjusting for age and confounders, people with MS had a 1.77 times greater risk of CKD than those without MS. The adjusted OR increased as the number of MS components increased (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The age-adjusted prevalence of CKD in the MS group was higher than that in the non-MS group. After adjustment for socioeconomic position and health behavior factor, MS showed significant association with CKD.

Introduction

Recently, emerging evidence, suggesting that metabolic syndrome (MS) contributes to an increased risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD), has received much more attention1 as the prevalence of CKD has increased dramatically. According to the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) data, the prevalence of CKD in the US adults was estimated to be approximately 11% (19.2 million).2 The prevalence of CKD in a Southeast Asian cohort (1985–97), over 10%, was similar to the US study.3 A report from the UK, which estimated the cost for the management of CKD by a computer simulation using creatinine values, showed a dramatic growth in the cost of treatment from €17 133 per 10 000 patients in 2002 to €29 790 in 2003.4 These costs were consistent with cost analysis data of a large US HMO population (1996–2001).5 To make matters worse, CKD prevalence is predicted to increase worldwide.6 As CKD is a major risk factor for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cardiovascular disease and premature death, a risk factor intervention method for the early CKD risk group may be the best approach for preventing and delaying CKD and its complications.

MS is diagnosed based on the presence of at least three of the following five factors: hypertension, abdominal obesity, high triglyceride (TG) levels, low levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL) and high levels of fasting blood sugar (FBS). The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III reported that the prevalence of MS in the US adults was 27% in 2005,7,8 whereas prevalence of MS in the Korean adults was 21% (men 20.1%, women 23.4%) in 2001.9 MS is a combination of medical disorders that increases the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. It is also a risk factor associated with atherosclerosis, which can progress to coronary artery disease or cerebrovascular accident.

Recently, a number of studies10–12 from the US have supported that MS is an independent risk factor for CKD. However, very little is known about the relationship between the risk factors of MS and CKD within the Asian population except for the Japanese. Although it is well established that the prevalence and cause of CKD vary by ethnicity, the majority of this evidence has been gathered from studies performed in Western countries. Moreover, most studies were conducted in hospital-based populations.13 Given the increasing prevalence of CKD and the burden of disease14 in Asian countries, there are pressing needs to investigate the relationship between CKD and MS. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of CKD and the association between MS and CKD after adjustment for socioeconomic position and health behavior factors in the Korean general population.

Methods

Study population

Data were collected from the 2005 KNHANES (Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) conducted by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare.15 The survey applied a stratified multistage probability sampling design from the South Korean population using a two-stage stratified systematic sampling method. Clusters of households were selected from each district and included an average of 20–26 households. The Health Interview Survey sample consisted of 42 780 people, which came from 13 345 households of 600 districts. One of every three health interview survey samples was selected, and both the health behavior survey and health examination were administered to the selected samples. Of those samples, 2515 men and 2621 women were ≥20 years of age.

Risk factors

Age was divided into six levels: 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, and >70 years. Waist circumference (WC) was measured at the narrowest point between the lowest rib and the top of the iliac crest. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured after subjects had rested for 5 min in a sitting position. An average of three blood pressure measurements was used for data analysis. Blood samples, collected from the antecubital vein after overnight nil per os., were measured for total cholesterol (TC), HDL, TG, FBS, hemoglobin and serum creatinine (Cr) levels by enzyme or colorimetric methods. All participating medical institutions were equipped with standardized, high-quality laboratories that had internal and external quality control procedures authorized by the Korean Association of Laboratory Quality Control. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin levels <12 g/dl in women and <13 g/dl in men.16 Self-reported information on the presence of hypertension and type 2 diabetes, and on education level, monthly household income, family size, smoking behavior, alcohol consumption and the amount of physical exercise per week were also obtained from the interviews. Since the 2005 KNHANES mainly included data on obesity, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and anemia, but not microalbuminuria, we did not use microalbuminuria as an evidence of chronic kidney damage.

Metabolic syndrome

Diagnosis of MS17,18 was based on the presence of three or more of the following symptoms: (1) WC ≥90 cm for men or ≥80 cm for women (Asia-pacific guidelines for WC),19 (2) TG levels ≥150 mg/dl, (3) HDL levels <40 mg/dl for men or <50 mg/dl for women, (4) hypertension, defined as SBP ≥130 mmHg, DBP ≥85 mmHg, or the subject was under active antihypertensive drug therapy, and (5) FBS ≥100 mg/dl, the subject was actively using oral medication or insulin. The subjects were classified into two groups: non-MS subjects including normal subjects (non-MS; n = 3772) and MS subjects (MS; n = 1364).

Chronic kidney disease

The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as an indicator of kidney function, was estimated using a formula from the Modification of Diet Renal Disease (MDRD) study:20 GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) = 186.3 × (serum Cr)−1.154 × (age)−0.203 × (0.742 if women) × (1.21 if African-Americans).

The National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative defined CKD as a GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2.

Socioeconomic factors

The socioeconomic factors used in this study were education level and equivalent household monthly income (equivalent income). Education was classified into three categories: (1) Elementary school: ≤6 years of schooling; (2) Middle/High school: 7–12 years of schooling; (3) College, University: >12 years of schooling. The equivalent income was calculated using the method defined by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,21 which is Wij = Yi/Siϵ, where Yi is the ith household income, Si is the ith household family size and Wij is the equivalent income of the jth member in the ith household. The equivalent elasticity (ϵ), which means the equivalency of the household size, is set to 0.5. The equivalent income was then calculated by dividing the obtained monthly household income by the square root of the family size. Equivalent income was categorized into three levels: low (<71), middle (71–140) and high (≥141).

Health behavior factors

Subjects were identified as former smokers if they had quitted smoking in the year prior to the survey. Alcohol consumption22 was calculated based on the number of alcohol drinks and the amount of alcohol consumption per day as reported on the health interview questionnaire. We divided the subjects into two groups: (1) drinking ≥30 g per day and (2) <30 g. For physical exercise, we had two groups: (1) 3 or more times per week and (2) less than 3 times.

Statistical analyses

Differences in general characteristics, socioeconomic factors, health behavior factors and clinical data between the MS and non-MS groups were analyzed using the student's t-test for the continuous variables and the χ2-test for the categorical variables. The group-specific age-adjusted prevalence of CKD was calculated based on MS and its components, and other confounders including gender, education, equivalent income, smoking, drinking and exercises; the direct standardized method with estimated Korean population in 2005 was used as the reference. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between MS as an independent variable and CKD as a dependent variable after adjustment for age and confounders. Model I used logistic regression after adjustment for age and Model II used logistic regression after adjustment for age and potential confounders. All analyses applied sample weights proposed by the Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs to estimate the nationwide prevalence.15

Results

As shown in Table 1, 26.6% of the overall population had MS. There was a significantly higher proportion of CKD (15.5%) among people with MS than those without MS (3.6%). Generally, people with MS were of older age, with more severe alcohol consumption, lower education and from a relatively higher income level than those without MS (P < 0.001). On the contrary, the proportion of current smokers is similar regardless of MS and the proportion of anemia in the non-MS group was higher than that of the MS group. The mean values of WC, SBP, DBP, TC, TG, FBS and Cr in the MS group were higher than those in the non-MS group (P < 0.001). The mean values of HDL and eGFR were lower for the MS group than those for the non-MS group (P < 0.001).

Table 1

General characteristics, socioeconomic position, health behaviors, chronic kidney disease and estimated glomerular filtration rate of participants compared by MS (n = 5136)

VariablesNon-MSMSP-value*
n (%) 3772 (73.4) 1364 (26.6)  
 Percentage  
Chronic kidney disease (<60 ml/min/1.73 m23.6 15.5 <0.001 
Age, year-old, mean ± SD 40.0 ± 14.5 52.8 ± 13.4 <0.001 
 20–29 27.1 3.7 <0.001 
 30–39 27.6 15.4  
 40–49 23.0 23.5  
 50–59 11.1 24.6  
 60–69 6.8 19.0  
 ≥70 4.4 13.7  
Gender, men 48.3 50.8 0.110 
Anemia 10.6 7.0 <0.001 
Smoking    
 Non 57.0 50.5 <0.001 
 Former 17.0 23.4  
 Current 26.0 26.1  
Alcohol consumption    
 Over 30 g/day 6.3 10.4 <0.001 
Physical exercise    
 Over 3 times/week 16.7 15.8 0.421 
Education level    
 College, University 42.1 20.4 <0.001 
 Middle/high school 45.3 46.1  
 Elementary school 12.6 33.5  
Income levela    
 High 16.3 21.6 <0.001 
 Middle 16.7 17.5  
 Lower 67.0 60.9  
 Mean ± SD  
WC (cm) 77.6 ± 8.6 89.4 ± 7.2 <0.001 
SBP (mmHg) 113.9 ± 14.9 130.7 ± 16.5 <0.001 
DBP (mmHg) 74.9 ± 10.0 84.1 ± 9.9 <0.001 
TC (mg/dl) 179.1 ± 33.8 195.9 ± 34.6 <0.001 
TG (mg/dl) 104.2 ± 63.4 218.3 ± 173.4 <0.001 
HDL (mg/dl) 47.1 ± 10.8 38.8 ± 7.2 <0.001 
FBS (mg/dl) 89.1 ± 13.9 107.2 ± 28.8 <0.001 
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m279.8 ± 12.3 73.2 ± 11.8 <0.001 
 Men 84.1 ± 12.0 79.2 ± 0.9 <0.001 
 Women 75.8 ± 11.3 67.0 ± 9.7 <0.001 
Cr (mg/dl) 0.98 ± 0.18 1.02 ± 0.19 <0.001 
 Men 1.07 ± 0.22 1.09 ± 0.15 0.041 
 Women 0.90 ± 0.10 0.95 ± 0.19 <0.001 
VariablesNon-MSMSP-value*
n (%) 3772 (73.4) 1364 (26.6)  
 Percentage  
Chronic kidney disease (<60 ml/min/1.73 m23.6 15.5 <0.001 
Age, year-old, mean ± SD 40.0 ± 14.5 52.8 ± 13.4 <0.001 
 20–29 27.1 3.7 <0.001 
 30–39 27.6 15.4  
 40–49 23.0 23.5  
 50–59 11.1 24.6  
 60–69 6.8 19.0  
 ≥70 4.4 13.7  
Gender, men 48.3 50.8 0.110 
Anemia 10.6 7.0 <0.001 
Smoking    
 Non 57.0 50.5 <0.001 
 Former 17.0 23.4  
 Current 26.0 26.1  
Alcohol consumption    
 Over 30 g/day 6.3 10.4 <0.001 
Physical exercise    
 Over 3 times/week 16.7 15.8 0.421 
Education level    
 College, University 42.1 20.4 <0.001 
 Middle/high school 45.3 46.1  
 Elementary school 12.6 33.5  
Income levela    
 High 16.3 21.6 <0.001 
 Middle 16.7 17.5  
 Lower 67.0 60.9  
 Mean ± SD  
WC (cm) 77.6 ± 8.6 89.4 ± 7.2 <0.001 
SBP (mmHg) 113.9 ± 14.9 130.7 ± 16.5 <0.001 
DBP (mmHg) 74.9 ± 10.0 84.1 ± 9.9 <0.001 
TC (mg/dl) 179.1 ± 33.8 195.9 ± 34.6 <0.001 
TG (mg/dl) 104.2 ± 63.4 218.3 ± 173.4 <0.001 
HDL (mg/dl) 47.1 ± 10.8 38.8 ± 7.2 <0.001 
FBS (mg/dl) 89.1 ± 13.9 107.2 ± 28.8 <0.001 
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m279.8 ± 12.3 73.2 ± 11.8 <0.001 
 Men 84.1 ± 12.0 79.2 ± 0.9 <0.001 
 Women 75.8 ± 11.3 67.0 ± 9.7 <0.001 
Cr (mg/dl) 0.98 ± 0.18 1.02 ± 0.19 <0.001 
 Men 1.07 ± 0.22 1.09 ± 0.15 0.041 
 Women 0.90 ± 0.10 0.95 ± 0.19 <0.001 

eGFR, Estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73 m2).

aEquivalent household monthly income.

*Student's t-test for continuous variables or χ2-test for descriptive variables between metabolic status and each variable.

Table 1

General characteristics, socioeconomic position, health behaviors, chronic kidney disease and estimated glomerular filtration rate of participants compared by MS (n = 5136)

VariablesNon-MSMSP-value*
n (%) 3772 (73.4) 1364 (26.6)  
 Percentage  
Chronic kidney disease (<60 ml/min/1.73 m23.6 15.5 <0.001 
Age, year-old, mean ± SD 40.0 ± 14.5 52.8 ± 13.4 <0.001 
 20–29 27.1 3.7 <0.001 
 30–39 27.6 15.4  
 40–49 23.0 23.5  
 50–59 11.1 24.6  
 60–69 6.8 19.0  
 ≥70 4.4 13.7  
Gender, men 48.3 50.8 0.110 
Anemia 10.6 7.0 <0.001 
Smoking    
 Non 57.0 50.5 <0.001 
 Former 17.0 23.4  
 Current 26.0 26.1  
Alcohol consumption    
 Over 30 g/day 6.3 10.4 <0.001 
Physical exercise    
 Over 3 times/week 16.7 15.8 0.421 
Education level    
 College, University 42.1 20.4 <0.001 
 Middle/high school 45.3 46.1  
 Elementary school 12.6 33.5  
Income levela    
 High 16.3 21.6 <0.001 
 Middle 16.7 17.5  
 Lower 67.0 60.9  
 Mean ± SD  
WC (cm) 77.6 ± 8.6 89.4 ± 7.2 <0.001 
SBP (mmHg) 113.9 ± 14.9 130.7 ± 16.5 <0.001 
DBP (mmHg) 74.9 ± 10.0 84.1 ± 9.9 <0.001 
TC (mg/dl) 179.1 ± 33.8 195.9 ± 34.6 <0.001 
TG (mg/dl) 104.2 ± 63.4 218.3 ± 173.4 <0.001 
HDL (mg/dl) 47.1 ± 10.8 38.8 ± 7.2 <0.001 
FBS (mg/dl) 89.1 ± 13.9 107.2 ± 28.8 <0.001 
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m279.8 ± 12.3 73.2 ± 11.8 <0.001 
 Men 84.1 ± 12.0 79.2 ± 0.9 <0.001 
 Women 75.8 ± 11.3 67.0 ± 9.7 <0.001 
Cr (mg/dl) 0.98 ± 0.18 1.02 ± 0.19 <0.001 
 Men 1.07 ± 0.22 1.09 ± 0.15 0.041 
 Women 0.90 ± 0.10 0.95 ± 0.19 <0.001 
VariablesNon-MSMSP-value*
n (%) 3772 (73.4) 1364 (26.6)  
 Percentage  
Chronic kidney disease (<60 ml/min/1.73 m23.6 15.5 <0.001 
Age, year-old, mean ± SD 40.0 ± 14.5 52.8 ± 13.4 <0.001 
 20–29 27.1 3.7 <0.001 
 30–39 27.6 15.4  
 40–49 23.0 23.5  
 50–59 11.1 24.6  
 60–69 6.8 19.0  
 ≥70 4.4 13.7  
Gender, men 48.3 50.8 0.110 
Anemia 10.6 7.0 <0.001 
Smoking    
 Non 57.0 50.5 <0.001 
 Former 17.0 23.4  
 Current 26.0 26.1  
Alcohol consumption    
 Over 30 g/day 6.3 10.4 <0.001 
Physical exercise    
 Over 3 times/week 16.7 15.8 0.421 
Education level    
 College, University 42.1 20.4 <0.001 
 Middle/high school 45.3 46.1  
 Elementary school 12.6 33.5  
Income levela    
 High 16.3 21.6 <0.001 
 Middle 16.7 17.5  
 Lower 67.0 60.9  
 Mean ± SD  
WC (cm) 77.6 ± 8.6 89.4 ± 7.2 <0.001 
SBP (mmHg) 113.9 ± 14.9 130.7 ± 16.5 <0.001 
DBP (mmHg) 74.9 ± 10.0 84.1 ± 9.9 <0.001 
TC (mg/dl) 179.1 ± 33.8 195.9 ± 34.6 <0.001 
TG (mg/dl) 104.2 ± 63.4 218.3 ± 173.4 <0.001 
HDL (mg/dl) 47.1 ± 10.8 38.8 ± 7.2 <0.001 
FBS (mg/dl) 89.1 ± 13.9 107.2 ± 28.8 <0.001 
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m279.8 ± 12.3 73.2 ± 11.8 <0.001 
 Men 84.1 ± 12.0 79.2 ± 0.9 <0.001 
 Women 75.8 ± 11.3 67.0 ± 9.7 <0.001 
Cr (mg/dl) 0.98 ± 0.18 1.02 ± 0.19 <0.001 
 Men 1.07 ± 0.22 1.09 ± 0.15 0.041 
 Women 0.90 ± 0.10 0.95 ± 0.19 <0.001 

eGFR, Estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73 m2).

aEquivalent household monthly income.

*Student's t-test for continuous variables or χ2-test for descriptive variables between metabolic status and each variable.

As seen in Table 2, age-adjusted prevalence of CKD in the MS group was 9.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.8–10.1), whereas those in the non-MS group was 5.6% (95% CI: 4.7–6.2).

Table 2

Age-adjusted prevalencea (95% CI) and their OR (and 95% CI) for chronic kidney disease with and without MS or MS components, after adjusting for age (model 1) and age and confounders (model II)b

VariablesnPrevalence (95% CI)Model Ic (95% CI)Model IId (95% CI)
MS 
 No 3772 5.6 (4.7–6.2) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1364 9.0 (7.8–10.1) 2.07 (1.60–2.70) 1.77 (1.34–2.34) 
Abdominal obesitye 
 No 3555 5.9 (5.0–6.8) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1881 8.8 (7.6–9.9) 1.73 (1.34–2.25) 1.27 (0.96–1.68) 
High TGf 
 No 3709 7.0 (6.1–7.8) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1427 7.8 (6.5–9.1) 1.23 (0.94–1.61) 1.32 (0.99–1.75) 
Low HDLg 
 No 2357 5.4 (4.4–6.5) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 2779 8.6 (7.6–9.6) 1.82 (1.38–2.40) 1.36 (1.02–1.83) 
High BPh 
 No 3410 6.3 (5.1–7.5) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1726 7.9 (6.9–8.8) 1.29 (0.98–1.70) 1.33 (0.99–1.78) 
High FBSi 
 No 4111 6.7 (5.9–7.6) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1025 8.0 (6.8–9.3) 1.50 (0.98–1.70) 1.70 (1.29–2.24) 
0 components 1131 5.2 (2.7–7.6) 1.0 1.0 
1 componentsj 1564 4.1 (2.9–5.3) 1.04 (0.57–1.89) 0.96 (0.53–1.74) 
2 componentsj 1078 6.5 (5.1–7.9) 1.31 (0.74–2.23) 1.21 (0.69–2.14) 
3 componentsj 792 8.8 (7.1–10.5) 2.26 (1.30–3.94) 1.81 (1.03–3.18) 
4 and 5 componentsj 571 9.0 (7.4–10.7) 2.56 (1.47–4.46) 2.34 (1.16–3.57) 
Age 5136 — — 1.13 (1.11–1.15) 
Gender 
 Men 2515 3.4 (2.6–4.2) 1.0 1.0 
 Women 2621 9.9 (8.9–11.0) 3.73 (2.77–5.00) 3.53 (2.42–5.15) 
Anemia 
 No 4642 7.2 (6.4–8.0) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 493 9.0 (6.6–11.4) 1.03 (0.70–1.53) 1.06 (0.71–1.59) 
Smoking 
 None 2848 9.2 (8.1–10.3) 1.0 1.0 
 Former 954 4.9 (3.6–6.1) 0.40 (0.28–0.56) 0.91 (0.58–1.43) 
 Current 1334 4.7 (3.3–6.2) 0.38 (0.26–0.55) 0.83 (0.52–1.33) 
Alcohol consumption 
 Less 30 g/day 4756 7.6 (6.9–8.4) 1.0 1.0 
 Over 30 g/day 380 2.1 (0.5–3.6) 0.23 (0.10–0.53) 0.45 (0.19–1.05) 
Physical exercise 
 Over 3 times/week 846 4.6 (2.7–6.5) 1.0 1.0 
 Less 3 times/week 4290 7.5 (6.8–8.3) 1.49 (0.96–2.33) 0.60 (0.34–1.08) 
Education level 
 College, University 930 2.4 (1.2–3.6) 1.0 1.0 
 Middle/high school 2339 5.2 (3.8–6.6) 1.26 (0.75–2.11) 0.99 (0.58–1.69) 
 Elementary school 1867 7.7 (6.8–8.7) 1.99 (1.17–3.39) 1.04 (0.58–1.86) 
Income levelk 
 High 3359 5.3 (2.6–8.0) 1.0 1.0 
 Middle 867 3.6 (2.4–4.8) 0.64 (0.37–1.12) 0.60 (0.64–1.08) 
 Lower 910 8.0 (7.2–8.9) 1.48 (0.97–2.27) 0.71 (0.44–1.15) 
VariablesnPrevalence (95% CI)Model Ic (95% CI)Model IId (95% CI)
MS 
 No 3772 5.6 (4.7–6.2) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1364 9.0 (7.8–10.1) 2.07 (1.60–2.70) 1.77 (1.34–2.34) 
Abdominal obesitye 
 No 3555 5.9 (5.0–6.8) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1881 8.8 (7.6–9.9) 1.73 (1.34–2.25) 1.27 (0.96–1.68) 
High TGf 
 No 3709 7.0 (6.1–7.8) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1427 7.8 (6.5–9.1) 1.23 (0.94–1.61) 1.32 (0.99–1.75) 
Low HDLg 
 No 2357 5.4 (4.4–6.5) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 2779 8.6 (7.6–9.6) 1.82 (1.38–2.40) 1.36 (1.02–1.83) 
High BPh 
 No 3410 6.3 (5.1–7.5) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1726 7.9 (6.9–8.8) 1.29 (0.98–1.70) 1.33 (0.99–1.78) 
High FBSi 
 No 4111 6.7 (5.9–7.6) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1025 8.0 (6.8–9.3) 1.50 (0.98–1.70) 1.70 (1.29–2.24) 
0 components 1131 5.2 (2.7–7.6) 1.0 1.0 
1 componentsj 1564 4.1 (2.9–5.3) 1.04 (0.57–1.89) 0.96 (0.53–1.74) 
2 componentsj 1078 6.5 (5.1–7.9) 1.31 (0.74–2.23) 1.21 (0.69–2.14) 
3 componentsj 792 8.8 (7.1–10.5) 2.26 (1.30–3.94) 1.81 (1.03–3.18) 
4 and 5 componentsj 571 9.0 (7.4–10.7) 2.56 (1.47–4.46) 2.34 (1.16–3.57) 
Age 5136 — — 1.13 (1.11–1.15) 
Gender 
 Men 2515 3.4 (2.6–4.2) 1.0 1.0 
 Women 2621 9.9 (8.9–11.0) 3.73 (2.77–5.00) 3.53 (2.42–5.15) 
Anemia 
 No 4642 7.2 (6.4–8.0) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 493 9.0 (6.6–11.4) 1.03 (0.70–1.53) 1.06 (0.71–1.59) 
Smoking 
 None 2848 9.2 (8.1–10.3) 1.0 1.0 
 Former 954 4.9 (3.6–6.1) 0.40 (0.28–0.56) 0.91 (0.58–1.43) 
 Current 1334 4.7 (3.3–6.2) 0.38 (0.26–0.55) 0.83 (0.52–1.33) 
Alcohol consumption 
 Less 30 g/day 4756 7.6 (6.9–8.4) 1.0 1.0 
 Over 30 g/day 380 2.1 (0.5–3.6) 0.23 (0.10–0.53) 0.45 (0.19–1.05) 
Physical exercise 
 Over 3 times/week 846 4.6 (2.7–6.5) 1.0 1.0 
 Less 3 times/week 4290 7.5 (6.8–8.3) 1.49 (0.96–2.33) 0.60 (0.34–1.08) 
Education level 
 College, University 930 2.4 (1.2–3.6) 1.0 1.0 
 Middle/high school 2339 5.2 (3.8–6.6) 1.26 (0.75–2.11) 0.99 (0.58–1.69) 
 Elementary school 1867 7.7 (6.8–8.7) 1.99 (1.17–3.39) 1.04 (0.58–1.86) 
Income levelk 
 High 3359 5.3 (2.6–8.0) 1.0 1.0 
 Middle 867 3.6 (2.4–4.8) 0.64 (0.37–1.12) 0.60 (0.64–1.08) 
 Lower 910 8.0 (7.2–8.9) 1.48 (0.97–2.27) 0.71 (0.44–1.15) 

aAge-adjusted prevalence rates of CKD were calculated with age adjustment to 5-year age groups according to the direct method with estimated Korean population in 2005 being referent.

bNon-CKD group: n = 4787, CKD group: n = 349.

cLogistic regression after adjustment for age.

dAdjusted for age, gender, anemia, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, equivalent household monthly income and education levels.

eWC ≥90 cm in men or ≥80 cm in women.

fTriglyceride levels ≥150 mg/dl.

gHDL <40 mg/dl in men or <50 mg/dl in women.

hBlood pressure ≥130/85 mmHg or use of antihypertensive drug therapy.

iFBS ≥100 mg/dl or use of oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin.

jCompared with those with 0 components.

kEquivalent household monthly income.

Table 2

Age-adjusted prevalencea (95% CI) and their OR (and 95% CI) for chronic kidney disease with and without MS or MS components, after adjusting for age (model 1) and age and confounders (model II)b

VariablesnPrevalence (95% CI)Model Ic (95% CI)Model IId (95% CI)
MS 
 No 3772 5.6 (4.7–6.2) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1364 9.0 (7.8–10.1) 2.07 (1.60–2.70) 1.77 (1.34–2.34) 
Abdominal obesitye 
 No 3555 5.9 (5.0–6.8) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1881 8.8 (7.6–9.9) 1.73 (1.34–2.25) 1.27 (0.96–1.68) 
High TGf 
 No 3709 7.0 (6.1–7.8) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1427 7.8 (6.5–9.1) 1.23 (0.94–1.61) 1.32 (0.99–1.75) 
Low HDLg 
 No 2357 5.4 (4.4–6.5) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 2779 8.6 (7.6–9.6) 1.82 (1.38–2.40) 1.36 (1.02–1.83) 
High BPh 
 No 3410 6.3 (5.1–7.5) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1726 7.9 (6.9–8.8) 1.29 (0.98–1.70) 1.33 (0.99–1.78) 
High FBSi 
 No 4111 6.7 (5.9–7.6) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1025 8.0 (6.8–9.3) 1.50 (0.98–1.70) 1.70 (1.29–2.24) 
0 components 1131 5.2 (2.7–7.6) 1.0 1.0 
1 componentsj 1564 4.1 (2.9–5.3) 1.04 (0.57–1.89) 0.96 (0.53–1.74) 
2 componentsj 1078 6.5 (5.1–7.9) 1.31 (0.74–2.23) 1.21 (0.69–2.14) 
3 componentsj 792 8.8 (7.1–10.5) 2.26 (1.30–3.94) 1.81 (1.03–3.18) 
4 and 5 componentsj 571 9.0 (7.4–10.7) 2.56 (1.47–4.46) 2.34 (1.16–3.57) 
Age 5136 — — 1.13 (1.11–1.15) 
Gender 
 Men 2515 3.4 (2.6–4.2) 1.0 1.0 
 Women 2621 9.9 (8.9–11.0) 3.73 (2.77–5.00) 3.53 (2.42–5.15) 
Anemia 
 No 4642 7.2 (6.4–8.0) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 493 9.0 (6.6–11.4) 1.03 (0.70–1.53) 1.06 (0.71–1.59) 
Smoking 
 None 2848 9.2 (8.1–10.3) 1.0 1.0 
 Former 954 4.9 (3.6–6.1) 0.40 (0.28–0.56) 0.91 (0.58–1.43) 
 Current 1334 4.7 (3.3–6.2) 0.38 (0.26–0.55) 0.83 (0.52–1.33) 
Alcohol consumption 
 Less 30 g/day 4756 7.6 (6.9–8.4) 1.0 1.0 
 Over 30 g/day 380 2.1 (0.5–3.6) 0.23 (0.10–0.53) 0.45 (0.19–1.05) 
Physical exercise 
 Over 3 times/week 846 4.6 (2.7–6.5) 1.0 1.0 
 Less 3 times/week 4290 7.5 (6.8–8.3) 1.49 (0.96–2.33) 0.60 (0.34–1.08) 
Education level 
 College, University 930 2.4 (1.2–3.6) 1.0 1.0 
 Middle/high school 2339 5.2 (3.8–6.6) 1.26 (0.75–2.11) 0.99 (0.58–1.69) 
 Elementary school 1867 7.7 (6.8–8.7) 1.99 (1.17–3.39) 1.04 (0.58–1.86) 
Income levelk 
 High 3359 5.3 (2.6–8.0) 1.0 1.0 
 Middle 867 3.6 (2.4–4.8) 0.64 (0.37–1.12) 0.60 (0.64–1.08) 
 Lower 910 8.0 (7.2–8.9) 1.48 (0.97–2.27) 0.71 (0.44–1.15) 
VariablesnPrevalence (95% CI)Model Ic (95% CI)Model IId (95% CI)
MS 
 No 3772 5.6 (4.7–6.2) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1364 9.0 (7.8–10.1) 2.07 (1.60–2.70) 1.77 (1.34–2.34) 
Abdominal obesitye 
 No 3555 5.9 (5.0–6.8) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1881 8.8 (7.6–9.9) 1.73 (1.34–2.25) 1.27 (0.96–1.68) 
High TGf 
 No 3709 7.0 (6.1–7.8) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1427 7.8 (6.5–9.1) 1.23 (0.94–1.61) 1.32 (0.99–1.75) 
Low HDLg 
 No 2357 5.4 (4.4–6.5) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 2779 8.6 (7.6–9.6) 1.82 (1.38–2.40) 1.36 (1.02–1.83) 
High BPh 
 No 3410 6.3 (5.1–7.5) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1726 7.9 (6.9–8.8) 1.29 (0.98–1.70) 1.33 (0.99–1.78) 
High FBSi 
 No 4111 6.7 (5.9–7.6) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 1025 8.0 (6.8–9.3) 1.50 (0.98–1.70) 1.70 (1.29–2.24) 
0 components 1131 5.2 (2.7–7.6) 1.0 1.0 
1 componentsj 1564 4.1 (2.9–5.3) 1.04 (0.57–1.89) 0.96 (0.53–1.74) 
2 componentsj 1078 6.5 (5.1–7.9) 1.31 (0.74–2.23) 1.21 (0.69–2.14) 
3 componentsj 792 8.8 (7.1–10.5) 2.26 (1.30–3.94) 1.81 (1.03–3.18) 
4 and 5 componentsj 571 9.0 (7.4–10.7) 2.56 (1.47–4.46) 2.34 (1.16–3.57) 
Age 5136 — — 1.13 (1.11–1.15) 
Gender 
 Men 2515 3.4 (2.6–4.2) 1.0 1.0 
 Women 2621 9.9 (8.9–11.0) 3.73 (2.77–5.00) 3.53 (2.42–5.15) 
Anemia 
 No 4642 7.2 (6.4–8.0) 1.0 1.0 
 Yes 493 9.0 (6.6–11.4) 1.03 (0.70–1.53) 1.06 (0.71–1.59) 
Smoking 
 None 2848 9.2 (8.1–10.3) 1.0 1.0 
 Former 954 4.9 (3.6–6.1) 0.40 (0.28–0.56) 0.91 (0.58–1.43) 
 Current 1334 4.7 (3.3–6.2) 0.38 (0.26–0.55) 0.83 (0.52–1.33) 
Alcohol consumption 
 Less 30 g/day 4756 7.6 (6.9–8.4) 1.0 1.0 
 Over 30 g/day 380 2.1 (0.5–3.6) 0.23 (0.10–0.53) 0.45 (0.19–1.05) 
Physical exercise 
 Over 3 times/week 846 4.6 (2.7–6.5) 1.0 1.0 
 Less 3 times/week 4290 7.5 (6.8–8.3) 1.49 (0.96–2.33) 0.60 (0.34–1.08) 
Education level 
 College, University 930 2.4 (1.2–3.6) 1.0 1.0 
 Middle/high school 2339 5.2 (3.8–6.6) 1.26 (0.75–2.11) 0.99 (0.58–1.69) 
 Elementary school 1867 7.7 (6.8–8.7) 1.99 (1.17–3.39) 1.04 (0.58–1.86) 
Income levelk 
 High 3359 5.3 (2.6–8.0) 1.0 1.0 
 Middle 867 3.6 (2.4–4.8) 0.64 (0.37–1.12) 0.60 (0.64–1.08) 
 Lower 910 8.0 (7.2–8.9) 1.48 (0.97–2.27) 0.71 (0.44–1.15) 

aAge-adjusted prevalence rates of CKD were calculated with age adjustment to 5-year age groups according to the direct method with estimated Korean population in 2005 being referent.

bNon-CKD group: n = 4787, CKD group: n = 349.

cLogistic regression after adjustment for age.

dAdjusted for age, gender, anemia, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, equivalent household monthly income and education levels.

eWC ≥90 cm in men or ≥80 cm in women.

fTriglyceride levels ≥150 mg/dl.

gHDL <40 mg/dl in men or <50 mg/dl in women.

hBlood pressure ≥130/85 mmHg or use of antihypertensive drug therapy.

iFBS ≥100 mg/dl or use of oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin.

jCompared with those with 0 components.

kEquivalent household monthly income.

Overall, the higher age-adjusted prevalence of CKD was observed in persons with MS, abdominal obesity, high TG, low HDL, high BP and high FBS. The age-adjusted prevalence of CKD according to the number of MS components from 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 and 5 was 5.2, 4.1, 6.5, 8.8 and 9.0%, respectively.

Women had a prevalence of CKD 3 times higher than that of men. For health behaviors, the prevalence of CKD among non-smokers and light drinkers was approximately 2–3 times higher than the prevalence among current smokers and heavy drinkers. In contrast, people who exercised less than 3 times per week had up to a 1.5 times higher risk of CKD than those who exercised regularly. Also, lower education and lower income persons were at a higher CKD risk. And there were 349 subjects with CKD in our study (Table 2).

The age-adjusted risk excess [odds ratio (OR)] of CKD, which ranged from 1.73 to 2.07, was statistically significant in MS, abdominal obesity and low HDL. People with a greater number of MS components, more than 3, showed a greater risk of CKD (P < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, CKD was associated with individual and multiple MS components. Adjusted OR for MS [1.77 (95% CI: 1.34–2.34)], high FBS [1.70 (95% CI: 1.29–2.24)] and low HDL [1.36 (95% CI: 1.02–1.83)] groups were positively associated with CKD. In addition, OR of 3 and ≥4 of MS components was 1.81 (95% CI: 1.03–3.18) and 2.34 (95% CI: 1.16–3.57), respectively (P < 0.001) compared with the 0 number of MS components (Table 2).

In the additional analysis, the proportions of hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease and chronic renal failure in the data were 14, 5, 6.8 and 0.6%, respectively.

Discussion

Main findings

After adjustment for socioeconomic position and health behavior factor, MS was significantly associated with CKD in the Korean population. For example, age-adjusted prevalence of CKD in the MS group was significantly higher than that in the non-MS group. The risk for CKD increased as the number of MS components increased.

What is already known on this topic

A number of studies from the USA10–12 and Japan23,24 have supported that MS is associated with CKD. Various studies have also demonstrated that the prevalence of CKD in the USA2 and Japan23,25 was over 10%, and the prevalence of MS in adults in the USA,8 Canada,26 Norway27 and Korea9 was over 25%. In the UK28 and USA,29,30 the prevalence of CKD was higher in lower socioeconomic and lower physical activity groups, which is similar to our results. The prevalence of CKD showed gender difference in the UK,31 USA32 and Norway.33 Also some researchers have shown the prevalence of CKD varies depending on the race and ethnicity.34–36 The prevalence of CKD in the MS group was also known to be significantly higher than that in the non-MS.10,11 Furthermore, the risk for CKD increased as the number of MS components increased.13,37

What this study adds

We investigated the prevalence of CKD and CKD with MS, as well as the association between MS and CKD for the general population of Korea. This study confirmed that MS has excessive risk for CKD after adjusting for health behavior factors and socioeconomic position as MS risk factors. Few studies, however, have made adjustments for them in analyzing the Korean population data.

The age-adjusted prevalence of CKD with MS was 9.0% and the prevalence of CKD was 6.8% in this study. Although the difference in the age-adjusted prevalence of CKD by MS status was statistically significant, the gap was not higher than that reported by the United States Renal Data System. The general prevalence of CKD in other studies31,32,38 was around 10%.

Our findings are consistent with previous studies that revealed a significant association between MS and CKD.11,39 For instance, in NHANES III,11 CKD was present in 1.2% of the subjects without MS and in 6.0% of the subjects with MS. The possible reason for why the lower prevalence of CKD in the USA (6.0%, 1988–94) than that in Korea (9.0%, 2005) might be the time gap between those two surveys.

Our findings also showed that low HDL, high FBS and gender were strong predictors for CKD.38 Low HDL and high LDL are common in patients with ESRD.40 In particular, low HDL has been shown to predict an increased risk of renal dysfunction.41–43

Epidemiologic studies have documented that diabetes is the major risk factor for the development and progression of CKD. For example, the Framingham Heart Study44 and Japanese population study45 supported the link between hyperinsulinemia and renal dysfunction. Our findings are consistent with these previous studies. These findings have very important implications for public health particularly because diabetic nephropathy is thought to be a microvascular complication of diabetes. Fox et al.46 showed that CKD, during pre-diabetes, may be considered an additional complication of macrovascular atherosclerosis.

With regard to gender, our study showed that women had a higher risk of CKD than men. Similarly, Plantinga's study47 had a higher percentage for women than for men. However, another study48 showed no significant gender difference for CKD.

Interestingly, our study showed that abdominal obesity, high BP and high TG demonstrated little association with CKD after adjusting for possible confounders. Our analysis indicated that abdominal obesity showed no clear association with CKD,3 whereas a number of studies in the USA11 and Iran49 have indicated that adjusted OR for obesity is associated with CKD. This controversial finding may be explained by race or ethnic differences.

Hypertension is the most common underlying cause of CKD. The relationship between hypertension and progression of CKD has been well established in several epidemiologic studies.50 The US studies have also showed an association between hypertension,11 or mildly elevated blood pressure2 (SBP ≥130 mmHg and DBP ≥85 mmHg) and CKD. Consistent with findings from our study, a Chinese study performed by Chen et al.38 showed no significant difference between mildly elevated blood pressure and CKD. Glomerulonephritis is the most common cause of CKD in China,38 but in Korea, it is not a known cause of CKD. Therefore, further longitudinal research on the cause of CKD is needed.

High TG levels predicted a decline in renal function and appeared to be a risk factor for developing CKD.51 However, Japanese52 and Chinese38 studies showed no association between high TG and CKD. Our finding was consistent with the aforementioned Asian studies,38,52 whereas inconsistent with a western study.11

Unexpectedly, current smokers and heavy drinkers had a lower risk for CKD than non-smokers and light drinkers in our study. Lower education or lower income groups showed a higher age-standardized prevalence and a higher risk for CKD than higher education and higher income groups. However, these effects disappeared after other potential risk factors for CKD were controlled. CKD is prevalent in individuals of lower socioeconomic position but there is little research that has examined this relationship. Therefore, future longitudinal research on the CKD risks of smoking or drinking and socioeconomic status is needed.

Anemia, a typical characteristic of ESRD, was recently shown to develop in the earlier course of the disease.2,53 However, our results did not show a significant association between anemia and CKD.

Based on the fact that a quarter of Korea's population has MS,9 the risk of CKD would be considered high in Korea resulting in higher medical cost. Furthermore, the worldwide ageing trend gives us a warning for the increasing prevalence of MS and CKD. It is critical for aging and aged societies to put effort to prevent MS and CKD, to manage CVD risk factors, so as to the development and/or progression of CVD, and to decrease CVD mortality. The primary preventive strategies such as effective health education, a well-balanced diet, physical activity and more attention to individuals with a familial history of CVD can reduce the MS risk factors and the development of MS and CKD. The secondary preventive strategies pursue the successful management of MS and CKD by early medical examination including pharmacotherapy and extensive clinical evaluation. Such primary and secondary preventive strategies should be performed at the same time.

Limitations and strengths of this study

There are several limitations to our study. First, it is difficult to explain the causality between MS and the development CKD in this cross-sectional study design. Second, due to the limited information in our data, we could not investigate the effects of microalbuminuria or pharmaceutical drug use, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, which may aggravate renal disease. Therefore, this is an additional area in which future research is necessary. Third, eGFR, based on the MDRD study equation, has not been validated for use with the Korean population. Although it has not been validated for Koreans, we used the MDRD equation because it has been widely used in epidemiological studies and clinical practice.

One strength of this study is a high degree of representation of Korean population with a high response rate (89.9%). Additionally, our result is based on objective measures including blood tests for a large random sample of the Korean population.

Conclusions

The age-adjusted prevalence of CKD in the MS group was higher than that in the non-MS group. After adjustment for socioeconomic position and health behavior factor, there is a significant association between MS and CKD in the Korean population.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Professor Kunitoshi Iseki at the dialysis unit in the university hospital of Ryukyus, Professor Charlotte Thomas-Hawkins and Professor Jiyoung Ahn at college of nursing, Rutgers in The State University of New Jersey and Dr Terry A. Klein and Sunny Kwon in 18th MEDCOM, USA for review and comments on this paper. We also thank Woon Young Jang for his contribution toward the completion of this study.

References

1
Smith
JM
Mott
SA
Hoy
WE
Status of chronic kidney disease prevention programs: International Federation of Kidney Foundation Members 2005/2007
Kidney Int
2008
, vol. 
74
 
12
(pg. 
1516
-
25
)
2
Coresh
J
Astor
BC
Greene
T
, et al. 
Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Am J Kidney Dis
2003
, vol. 
41
 
1
(pg. 
1
-
12
)
3
Kitiyakara
C
Yamwong
S
Cheepudomwit
S
, et al. 
The metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease in a Southeast Asian cohort
Kidney Int
2007
, vol. 
71
 
7
(pg. 
693
-
700
)
4
Klebe
B
Irving
J
Stevens
PE
, et al. 
The cost of implementing UK guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease
Nephrol Dial Transplant
2007
, vol. 
22
 
9
(pg. 
2504
-
12
)
5
Smith
DH
Gullion
CM
Nichols
G
, et al. 
Cost of medical care for chronic kidney disease and comorbidity among enrollees in a large HMO population
J Am Soc Nephrol
2004
, vol. 
15
 
5
(pg. 
1300
-
6
)
6
Kuo
HW
Tsai
SS
Tiao
MM
, et al. 
Epidemiological features of CKD in Taiwan
Am J Kidney Dis
2007
, vol. 
49
 
1
(pg. 
46
-
55
)
7
Ford
ES
Giles
WH
Mokdad
AH
Increasing prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults
Diabetes Care
2004
, vol. 
27
 
10
(pg. 
2444
-
9
)
8
Reynolds
K
He
J
Epidemiology of the metabolic syndrome
Am J Med Sci
2005
, vol. 
330
 
6
(pg. 
273
-
9
)
9
Park
HS
Kim
SM
Lee
JS
, et al. 
Prevalence and trends of metabolic syndrome in Korea: Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey 1998–2001
Diabetes Obes Metab
2007
, vol. 
9
 
1
(pg. 
50
-
8
)
10
Kurella
M
Lo
JC
Chertow
GM
Metabolic syndrome and the risk for chronic kidney disease among nondiabetic adults
J Am Soc Nephrol
2005
, vol. 
16
 
7
(pg. 
2134
-
40
)
11
Chen
J
Muntner
P
Hamm
LL
, et al. 
The metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease in U.S. adults
Ann Intern Med
2004
, vol. 
140
 
3
(pg. 
167
-
74
)
12
Lucove
J
Vupputuri
S
Heiss
G
, et al. 
Metabolic syndrome and the development of CKD in American Indians: the Strong Heart Study
Am J Kidney Dis
2008
, vol. 
51
 
1
(pg. 
21
-
8
)
13
Lee
JE
Choi
SY
Huh
W
, et al. 
Metabolic syndrome, C-reactive protein, and chronic kidney disease in nondiabetic, nonhypertensive adults
Am J Hypertens
2007
, vol. 
20
 
11
(pg. 
1189
-
94
)
14
Meguid
EL
Nahas
A
Bello
AK
Chronic kidney disease: the global challenge
Lancet
2005
, vol. 
365
 
9456
(pg. 
331
-
40
)
15
2005 The Third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
The Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs for the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare
2007
16
Izaks
GJ
Westendorp
RG
Knook
DL
The definition of anemia in older persons
Jama
1999
, vol. 
281
 
18
(pg. 
1714
-
7
)
17
Grundy
SM
Cleeman
JI
Daniels
SR
, et al. 
Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement
Circulation
2005
, vol. 
112
 
17
(pg. 
2735
-
52
)
18
Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
Jama
2001
, vol. 
285
 
19
(pg. 
2486
-
97
)
19
Park
HS
Song
YM
Cho
SI
Obesity has a greater impact on cardiovascular mortality in younger men than in older men among non-smoking Koreans
Int J Epidemiol
2006
, vol. 
35
 
1
(pg. 
181
-
7
)
20
Levey
AS
Coresh
J
Balk
E
, et al. 
National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification
Ann Intern Med
2003
, vol. 
139
 
2
(pg. 
137
-
47
)
21
OECD
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): What are equivalence scales?
 
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/52/35411111.pdf(date last accessed 27 September 2005)
22
Bellentani
S
Saccoccio
G
Costa
G
, et al. 
Drinking habits as cofactors of risk for alcohol induced liver damage. The Dionysos Study Group
Gut
1997
, vol. 
41
 
6
(pg. 
845
-
50
)
23
Tanaka
H
Shiohira
Y
Uezu
Y
, et al. 
Metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease in Okinawa, Japan
Kidney Int
2006
, vol. 
69
 
2
(pg. 
369
-
74
)
24
Ninomiya
T
Kiyohara
Y
Kubo
M
, et al. 
Metabolic syndrome and CKD in a general Japanese population: the Hisayama Study
Am J Kidney Dis
2006
, vol. 
48
 
3
(pg. 
383
-
91
)
25
Yamagata
K
Ishida
K
Sairenchi
T
, et al. 
Risk factors for chronic kidney disease in a community-based population: a 10-year follow-up study
Kidney Int
2007
, vol. 
71
 
2
(pg. 
159
-
66
)
26
Liu
J
Hanley
AJ
Young
TK
, et al. 
Characteristics and prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among three ethnic groups in Canada
Int J Obes (Lond)
2006
, vol. 
30
 
4
(pg. 
669
-
76
)
27
Hildrum
B
Mykletun
A
Hole
T
, et al. 
Age-specific prevalence of the metabolic syndrome defined by the International Diabetes Federation and the National Cholesterol Education Program: the Norwegian HUNT 2 study
BMC Public Health
2007
, vol. 
7
 pg. 
220
 
28
Bello
AK
Peters
J
Rigby
J
, et al. 
Socioeconomic status and chronic kidney disease at presentation to a renal service in the United Kingdom
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol
2008
, vol. 
3
 
5
(pg. 
1316
-
23
)
29
Merkin
SS
Roux
AV
Coresh
J
, et al. 
Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status and progressive chronic kidney disease in an elderly population: the Cardiovascular Health Study
Soc Sci Med
2007
, vol. 
65
 
4
(pg. 
809
-
21
)
30
Fassett
RG
Robertson
IK
Geraghty
DP
, et al. 
Physical activity levels in patients with chronic kidney disease entering the LORD trial
Med Sci Sports Exerc
2009
, vol. 
41
 
5
(pg. 
985
-
91
)
31
Stevens
PE
O'Donoghue
DJ
de Lusignan
S
, et al. 
Chronic kidney disease management in the United Kingdom: NEOERICA project results
Kidney Int
2007
, vol. 
72
 
1
(pg. 
92
-
9
)
32
Plantinga
LC
Boulware
LE
Coresh
J
, et al. 
Patient awareness of chronic kidney disease: trends and predictors
Arch Intern Med
2008
, vol. 
168
 
20
(pg. 
2268
-
75
)
33
Eriksen
BO
Ingebretsen
OC
The progression of chronic kidney disease: a 10-year population-based study of the effects of gender and age
Kidney Int
2006
, vol. 
69
 
2
(pg. 
375
-
82
)
34
Xu
R
Zhang
L
Zhang
P
, et al. 
Comparison of the prevalence of chronic kidney disease among different ethnicities: Beijing CKD survey and American NHANES
Nephrol Dial Transplant
2009
, vol. 
24
 
4
(pg. 
1220
-
6
)
35
Freedman
BI
End-stage renal failure in African Americans: insights in kidney disease susceptibility
Nephrol Dial Transplant
2002
, vol. 
17
 
2
(pg. 
198
-
200
)
36
Smith
SR
Svetkey
LP
Dennis
VW
Racial differences in the incidence and progression of renal diseases
Kidney Int
1991
, vol. 
40
 
5
(pg. 
815
-
22
)
37
Hoehner
CM
Greenlund
KJ
Rith-Najarian
S
, et al. 
Association of the insulin resistance syndrome and microalbuminuria among nondiabetic native Americans. The Inter-Tribal Heart Project
J Am Soc Nephrol
2002
, vol. 
13
 
6
(pg. 
1626
-
34
)
38
Chen
J
Gu
D
Chen
CS
, et al. 
Association between the metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease in Chinese adults
Nephrol Dial Transplant
2007
, vol. 
22
 
4
(pg. 
1100
-
6
)
39
Stengel
B
Jaussent
I
Guiserix
J
, et al. 
High prevalence of chronic kidney disease in La Reunion island and its association with the metabolic syndrome in the non-diabetic population: La Reunion Diabetes (REDIA) Study
Diabetes Metab
2007
, vol. 
33
 
6
(pg. 
444
-
52
)
40
Kasiske
BL
Hyperlipidemia in patients with chronic renal disease
Am J Kidney Dis
1998
, vol. 
32
 
5 Suppl. 3
(pg. 
S142
-
S156
)
41
Muntner
P
Coresh
J
Smith
JC
, et al. 
Plasma lipids and risk of developing renal dysfunction: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study
Kidney Int
2000
, vol. 
58
 
1
(pg. 
293
-
301
)
42
Hunsicker
LG
Adler
S
Caggiula
A
, et al. 
Predictors of the progression of renal disease in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study
Kidney Int
1997
, vol. 
51
 
6
(pg. 
1908
-
19
)
43
Manttari
M
Tiula
E
Alikoski
T
, et al. 
Effects of hypertension and dyslipidemia on the decline in renal function
Hypertension
1995
, vol. 
26
 
4
(pg. 
670
-
5
)
44
Fox
CS
Larson
MG
Leip
EP
, et al. 
Glycemic status and development of kidney disease: the Framingham Heart Study
Diabetes Care
2005
, vol. 
28
 
10
(pg. 
2436
-
40
)
45
Kubo
M
Kiyohara
Y
Kato
I
, et al. 
Effect of hyperinsulinemia on renal function in a general Japanese population: the Hisayama study
Kidney Int
1999
, vol. 
55
 
6
(pg. 
2450
-
6
)
46
Culleton
BF
Larson
MG
Wilson
PW
, et al. 
Cardiovascular disease and mortality in a community-based cohort with mild renal insufficiency
Kidney Int
1999
, vol. 
56
 
6
(pg. 
2214
-
9
)
47
Plantinga
LC
Miller
ER
3rd
Stevens
LA
, et al. 
Blood pressure control among persons without and with chronic kidney disease: US trends and risk factors 1999–2006
Hypertension
2009
, vol. 
54
 
1
(pg. 
47
-
56
)
48
Fox
CS
Larson
MG
Leip
EP
, et al. 
Predictors of new-onset kidney disease in a community-based population
Jama
2004
, vol. 
291
 
7
(pg. 
844
-
50
)
49
Noori
N
Hosseinpanah
F
Nasiri
AA
, et al. 
Comparison of overall obesity and abdominal adiposity in predicting chronic kidney disease incidence among adults
J Ren Nutr
2009
, vol. 
19
 
3
(pg. 
228
-
37
)
50
Barri
YM
Hypertension and kidney disease: a deadly connection
Curr Cardiol Rep
2006
, vol. 
8
 
6
(pg. 
411
-
7
)
51
Tozawa
M
Iseki
K
Iseki
C
, et al. 
Triglyceride, but not total cholesterol or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, predict development of proteinuria
Kidney Int
2002
, vol. 
62
 
5
(pg. 
1743
-
9
)
52
Tozawa
M
Iseki
C
Tokashiki
K
, et al. 
Metabolic syndrome and risk of developing chronic kidney disease in Japanese adults
Hypertens Res
2007
, vol. 
30
 
10
(pg. 
937
-
43
)
53
Foley
RN
Wang
C
Collins
AJ
Cardiovascular risk factor profiles and kidney function stage in the US general population: the NHANES III study
Mayo Clin Proc
2005
, vol. 
80
 
10
(pg. 
1270
-
7
)