The effective reproductive number of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is several times relative to Delta

Our review found the effective reproduction number and basic reproduction number of the Omicron variant elicited 3.8 and 2.5 times higher transmissibility than the Delta variant, respectively. The Omicron variant has an average basic and effective reproduction number of 8.2 and 3.6.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concerns (VOC) evolve in settings with high virus circulation, and are defined as variants for which there is evidence of any single or combination of following characteristics: increased transmissibility, more severe disease (e.g.increased hospitalizations or deaths), significant reduction in neutralization by antibodies generated during previous infection or vaccination, reduced effectiveness of therapeutics, vaccines or diagnostic detection failures. 1The newest addition to the list of VoC was Omicron [Alpha (B.1.1.7),Beta (B.1.351),Gamma (P.1), Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529)].Omicron was first detected in specimens collected in Botswana and South Africa in November 2021.Although Omicron appears to be associated with less severe disease, transmissibility of this VoC is higher compared with all previous VoC.Omicron spread with an unpresented speed around the world, and by February 2022, Omicron is the dominant VoC.
We conducted a rapid review to determine the estimates of the effective and basic reproduction number (R e and R 0 ) of Omicron.R e and R 0 are central concepts within infectious disease epidemiology that describe the potential of epidemic spread of infectious agents.R 0/e is, simply put, composed of the transmissibility of a virus in combination with the contact patterns of the exposed population.R 0 represents the average number of new infections generated by an infectious person in a totally naïve population.If R 0 > 1, the number infected is likely to increase, and if R 0 < 1, transmission is likely to decline and the pathogen becomes endemic and the outbreak is contained.R e represents a similar quantity with the same interpretation, but in setting of non-pharmaceutical interventions and/or a background immunity in the exposed population as a result of vaccination and/or natural infection.
We accessed PubMed, Web of Science, bioRxiv and medRxiv, Google, Baidu and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database and their relevant references from 1 November 2021 to 9 February 2022, using the search terms 'B.1.1.529'or 'Omicron'.The inclusion criteria were studies that report the basic reproduction number or effective reproductive number of the Omicron variant, the ratio of the reproduction numbers of Omicron and Delta or give the explicit equation.Only studies published in English or Chinese were considered.The exclusion criteria were review articles, studies only investigating limited sub-populations, non-English or non-Chinese articles and studies without full text.
Search results were imported into EndNote X9 (EndNote version X9, Thomson Reuters, California), and references were screened according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria stated above.The lead author (YL) conducted the search, screened the studies by title and abstract for eligibility, reviewed the full text of the included studies and extracted the data.The articles included in this review were analysed twice by the same individual to reduce errors.The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed as illustrated in the flow diagram (Supplementary Figure S1, Supplementary data are available at JTM online).
In total, with the search criteria, 1914 studies were retrieved with 471 hits from PubMed, 630 hits from Web of Science, 293 through bioRxiv and 520 through medRixv.We identified 15 eligible studies of 18 estimates, which provide the basic reproductive number (8 estimates) and effective reproduction number (10 estimates) for Omicron.In Table 1, the results show that the effective reproduction number and basic reproduction number of the Omicron variant elicited 3.8 and 2.5 times higher transmissibility than the Delta variant, respectively.The Omicron variant has an average basic reproduction number of 9.5 and a range from 5.5 to 24 (median 10 and interquartile range, IQR: 7.25, 11.88).The average effective reproduction number for Omicron is 3.4 with a range from 0.88 to 9.4 (median 2.8 and IQR: 2.03, 3.85).The highest R 0 of 24 from South-Africa is a theoretical ceiling assuming no immune evasion.
Our findings indicate that Omicron has a higher average effective, and perhaps, basic reproduction number compared with the Delta variant and the ancestral SARS-Cov-2 virus. 2,3The higher reproductive number of Omicron compared with Delta can be partly explained by higher intrinsic transmissibility further compounded by its immune escaping ability.The Omicron variant spread rapidly in Europe (Denmark and the UK) may be because it is capable to escape from existing population-level immunity naturally or by vaccination.
The increases in the reproductive rates of Omicron have led to a rebound of the epidemic in many countries.Preliminary estimates suggest the transmissibility may be higher among children, 4,5 due to the fact that vaccine induced immunity is lower, and children have a much higher number and frequency of contacts.Exact estimates of R 0 and R e are difficult to determine due to confounding factors such as the extent of nonpharmaceutical interventions and prior immunity, which differs within and between countries.Variants with higher reproduction numbers such as Omicron will sweep more quickly through communities and reach the outbreak peak earlier, even if such variants will require a higher population-level immunity threshold for R e to be below 1.As Omicron is antigenically the most distant to the ancestral strain, currently available coronavirus disease of 2019 vaccines have a lower vaccine effectiveness against mild infections, but still show evidence of protecting against severe disease. 6,7

Table 1 .
Published estimates of R

Table 1 .
All the references can be found in Supplementary Materials available as Supplementary data at JTM online. *