Abstract

Background

There is little data available on the actual risk to travelers of being possibly exposed to rabies. This data would be useful in advising travelers who are considering rabies pre-exposure immunization. In addition, it is not known how many travelers are already pre-immunized when they are bitten by a possibly rabid animal. The current study was performed to determine the rate at which travelers to Nepal are possibly exposed to rabies, and to determine risk factors for possible rabies exposure.

Methods

A prospective 3-year study was carried out at the Canadian International Water and Energy Consultants (CIWEC) Clinic Travel Medicine Center in Kathmandu, Nepal, during the years 1996 through 1998. All non-Nepalese and non-Indian patients who presented with animal bites or scratches were eligible to be included in the study.

Results

Ninety-nine persons presented with possible rabies exposures to the CIWEC Clinic during the study period; 56 were tourists, and 43 were resident expatriates. The incidence of people presenting to the CIWEC clinic with possible rabies exposures was 1.9 per 1,000 persons/year for tourists, and 5.7 per 1,000 persons/year for resident expatriates (p <.0001). The incidence of possible exposure to rabies while trekking was 1.2 per 1,000 persons/year. Women were significantly more likely than men to present with a possible rabies exposure, accounting for 61% of patients (p =.0027). Younger people were more likely to have bite exposures to the face and head than older patients. The length of time between exposure and treatment averaged 1.6 to 5.0 days. Among patients presenting with animal bites, 56% of foreign residents, and 21% of tourists had been pre-immunized against rabies.

Conclusions

Foreign residents of Nepal are significantly more likely to be exposed to rabies than tourists. Trekking does not increase the chances of being exposed to rabies. Children have a higher risk of being bitten on the face and head, and females are more likely than males to be bitten or scratched by a possibly rabid animal.

REFERENCES

1
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Health information for international travel 1999–2000
1999
Atlanta, Georgia
Department of Health and Human Services
.
2
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Human rabies prevention—United States, 1999: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
.
MMWR
 
1999
;
48
(
RR-1
):
4
.
3
Gacouin
A
Bourhy
H
Renaud
JC
et al.
Human rabies despite postexposure vaccination
.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
 
1999
;
18
:
233
235
. (PubMed) 10357065
4
Guidelines for rabies surveillance, prevention and control
1997
Kathmandu, Nepal
His Majesty's Government, Department of Health, Epidemiology and Disease Control Division
.
5
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Human rabies — New Hampshire, 1996
.
MMWR
 
1997
;
46
:
267
270
.
6
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Imported human rabies—Australia, 1987
.
MMWR
 
1988
;
37
:
351
353
.
7
Nepal Tourism Statistics 1997
1998
Kathmandu, Nepal
His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Ministry of Tourism and Civil Aviation
.
8
Summary of Tourism Statistics 1997 vs. 1998
1999
Kathmandu, Nepal
His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Ministry of Tourism and Civil Aviation
.
9
Shlim
DR
Schwartz
E
Houston
R
.
Rabies immunoprophylaxis strategy in travelers
.
J Wilderness Med
 
1991
;
2
:
15
21
.
10
Bernard
KW
Fishbein
DB
.
Pre-exposure rabies prophylaxis for travellers: are the benefits worth the cost?
Vaccine
 
1991
;
9
:
833
836
. (PubMed) 1759505
11
Hatz
CF
Bidaux
JM
Eichenberger
K
et al.
Circumstances and management of 72 animal bites among long-term residents in the tropics
.
Vaccine
 
1995
;
13
:
811
815
. (PubMed) 7483802
12
Helmick
CG
.
The epidemiology of human rabies post exposure prophylaxis, 1980–81
.
JAMA
 
1983
;
250
:
1990
1996
. (PubMed) 6620498
The authors had no financial or other conflicts of interest to disclose.