Abstract

There are good reasons for questioning the overtly negative interpretations of John 3:9 that prevail in current scholarship. A helpful place to start is to ask what kind of question 3:9 is. There are three options: (i) a question of modality, asking in what way birth from above takes place; (ii) a rhetorical question, the purpose of which is to question that birth from above can take place; or (iii) a real question about the conditions under which a birth from above could take place. The present article claims that 3:9 is a real and legitimate question that is given a substantive answer by Jesus. Many of the negative claims made about Nicodemus based on 3:9 are either unwarranted or questionable. Nicodemus is not critiqued for asking the question in 3:9 or for not knowing its answer, but for thinking that he already knew who Jesus was and for not adequately realizing his own need to be born from above.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
You do not currently have access to this article.