Functional characterization and hormonal regulation of the PHEOPHYTINASE gene LpPPH controlling leaf senescence in perennial ryegrass

Highlight Leaf senescence regulated by abscisic acid, cytokinins, and ethyelene was associated with transcriptional regulation of LpPPH. Orthologous PPH genes share conserved cis-elements potentially targeted by hormonal signaling pathways.


Introduction
Leaf senescence is a highly regulated natural process during the life of a leaf, which involves degradation of various macromolecules, such as chlorophyll (Chl) and proteins (Breeze et al., 2011;Fukao et al., 2012). Premature leaf senescence leads to demolished photosynthesis, retarded plant growth and productivity (Guo and Gan, 2014). Chl degradation is the common hallmark of leaf senescence. Chl degradation involves multiple biochemical reactions catalyzed by at least six Chl catabolic enzymes (CCEs) in the chloroplast, namely pheophytin pheophorbide hydrolyase (PPH), Non-Yellow Coloring1 (NYC1), NYC1-like (NOL), Chl a reductase (HCAR), pheide a oxidase (PAO), and red Chl catabolite reductase (RCCR) (Hörtensteiner, 2006;Barry, 2009;Hörtensteiner and Kräutler, 2011). PPH, also named NYC3 in rice (Oryza sativa) or CRN1 in Arabidopsis, is one of the key CCEs, which catalyzes conversion of pheophytin a to pheophorbide a by cleaving off the phytol group (Schelbert et al., 2009). The PPH transcript level is positively correlated with the extent of leaf senescence during the natural leaf maturation process (Schelbert et al., 2009) or is induced by stresses, such as dark or shade (Wei et al., 2011;Liu and Guo, 2013). However, the regulatory mechanisms of PPH expression associated with natural or stress-induced leaf senescence are not well understood.
Plant hormones, such as abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene, and cytokinin (CK), are known to play roles in regulating both natural leaf senescence and that induced by stress (Thomas and Stoddart, 1980;Grbić and Bleecker, 1995;Yang et al., 2002;Dodd and Beveridge, 2006;Lim et al., 2007;Kim et al., 2015). Recently, a number of independent studies suggested a possible link between Chl catabolism and ABA, ethylene, and CK signaling pathways Nakjima et al., 2012;Delmas et al., 2013;Zwack and Rashotte, 2013;Cheng and Guan, 2014;Koyama, 2014;Qiu et al., 2015). ABA at high concentrations may accelerate leaf senescence and Chl degradation (Thomas and Stoddart, 1980).  and Cheng and Guan (2014) found that exogenous spraying of ethylene also induced the Chl degradation associated with higher transcript levels of Chl catabolism genes in both pear and broccoli. In the model plant Arabidopsis, ethylene-insensitive mutants (etr1, ein2/ore2, and ein3) had a slower rate of Chl degradation during leaf senescence (Oh et al., 1997;Sakai et al., 1998;Li et al., 2013;Qiu et al., 2015). Furthermore, EIN3, together with ORE1/NAC2, transcription factors in the ethylene signaling pathway, promotes Chl degradation by enhancing the promoter activity of Chl degradation genes (such as NYE1 or SGR, NYC1, and PAO) (Qiu et al., 2015). In contrast to ABA and ethylene, CK is known to be negatively correlated with the level of leaf senescence (Zwack and Rashotte, 2013). The correlation between a decreased endogenous CK level in leaves and the onset and progression of senescence has been documented (Tao et al., 1983). The increase of endogenous CK content through overexpression of the CK synthesis gene, isopentenyl-transferases (IPT), could significantly extend the lifespan of leaves in various plant species (Li et al., 1992;Gan and Amasino, 1995;Merewitz et al., 2010). Despite the importance of the involvement of ABA, ethylene, and CK in leaf senescence, it is unclear whether ABA-, ethylene-, or CK-mediated leaf senescence is related to the regulation of PPH genes for Chl breakdown during leaf senescence.
Leaf senescence is a major problem for perennial grasses which are harvested for their green foliage as forage or maintained for a uniform green canopy as is the case for turfgrasses. Knowledge of mechanisms controlling leaf senescence is particularly important for developing staygreen grasses and improving forage or turf quality. As discussed earlier, PPH is a key gene involved in Chl degradation, but how this gene is regulated during leaf senescence in plants, particularly in perennial grass species, is still unclear. Manipulating the expression of PPH through genetic modification or mutagenesis could lead to a stay-green phenotype in plants ( Morita et al., 2009;Schelbert et al., 2009). In this study, we hypothesized that PPH cloned from a perennial grass species could possess the conserved functionality in Chl degradation, and PPH-mediated leaf senescence could be regulated by ABA, ethylene, or CK. The objectives of this study were (i) to determine the functional roles of PPH in leaf senescence in a perennial grass species (Lolium perenne L.) widely used as forage and turfgrass; (ii) to identify the regulatory roles of ABA, ethylene, and CK in PPH expression; and (iii) to predict the potential transcriptional factors activating or suppressing PPH expression conserved across diverse plant species.

Plant materials and growth conditions
Perennial ryegrass (cv. 'Pinnacle') plants were used for cloning of the PPH gene and evaluation of PPH expression in relation to leaf senescence. Plants were grown in plastic pots (20 cm in diameter and 25 cm in height) filled with the mixture of soil and peat (3:1 v/v) and maintained in growth chambers (Environmental Growth Chamber, Chagrin Falls, OH, USA) set at 25/20 °C (day/night), 70% relative humidity, and 12 h photoperiod with photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of 750 µmol photons m -2 s -1 .
The function of the PPH gene from perennial ryegrass in leaf senescence was confirmed using transient transformation and mutant complementation assay in two model plant species, wild tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) and Arabidopsis. Wild tobacco plants were cultured under the same conditions as for perennial ryegrass.
Arabidopsis thaliana wild-type (Col-0) and T-DNA insertion lines (at5g13800-1, SALK_000095) were grown in 10 cm 2 pots with peat soil, and were maintained in growth chambers (Environmental Growth Chamber) set at 22 °C with a 16 h photoperiod and a PAR of 350 µmol photons m -2 s -1 . The T-DNA line was obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC) (Alonso et al., 2003). All plants were well watered, and fertilized weekly with half-strength Hoagland's nutrient solution (Hoagland and Arnon, 1950).
Evaluation of leaf senescence in perennial ryegrass induced by darkness and affected by ABA, ethephon, AVG, and CK Leaf senescence affected by ethephon, aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG), ABA, and CK and induced by darkness was evaluated in perennial ryegrass. For dark-induced leaf senescence, the fully expanded leaves (~12 d after leaf emergence) were excised from perennial ryegrass plants, and were kept in between paper towels moistened with 3 mM MES buffer (pH 5.8) at 25 °C for 8 d in the dark. For ethephon, AVG, ABA, and CK treatment, the protocol reported by Sato et al. (2009) was used. The fully expanded leaves (~12 d after leaf emergence) were excised from perennial ryegrass plants, and incubated in 3 mM MES buffer (pH 5.8) supplemented with water (control), 200 µM ethephon, 25 µM AVG, 50 µM ABA, or 25 µM 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) at 25 °C.
Several physiological parameters commonly used as indicators of leaf senescence were evaluated, namely leaf Chl content, photochemical efficiency, and membrane stability (Liu and Guo, 2013;Tian et al., 2013;Yamatani et al., 2013). Chl was extracted by soaking leaves in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for 48 h and the absorbance of extracts was measured at 663 nm and 645 nm using a spectrophotometer (Spectronic in Instruments, Rochester, NY, USA) (Barnes et al., 1992). Leaf photochemical efficiency was expressed as the ratio of the variable fluorescence (F v ) to the maximal fluorescence (F m ) (F v /F m ) (Oxborough and Baker, 1997). Chl fluorescence was determined using a fluorescence meter (Dynamax, Houston, TX, USA) after leaves were dark adapted for 30 min. Leaf membrane stability was estimated by electrolyte leakage (EL) from leaves (Murray et al., 1989). For EL measurement, 0.2 g of leaves were collected, washed three times, and then immersed in 30 ml of deionized water. Initial conductivity (C i ) was measured with a conductivity meter (YSI Model 32, Yellow Spring, OH, USA) after shaking overnight. Leaves were then boiled in an autoclave for 20 min for measurement of the conductance (C max ). The leaf relative EL was calculated as 100×C i /C max .
Isolation and sequence analysis of PPH from perennial ryegrass (LpPPH) Total RNA was extracted from senescent leaf samples of perennial ryegrass. A pair of primers (LpPPH-F and LpPPH-R; Supplementary Table S1 available at JXB online) was designed for cloning the conserved nucleotide sequence of LpPPH according to the alignment of the PPH genes in rice and brachypodium. Two gene-specific primers (LpPPH-3' RACE and LpPPH-5' RACE; Supplementary Table S1) were designed to amplify the ends of the PPH gene. The cDNA used for random amplification of cDNA ends (RACE)-PCR was synthesized with a SMARTer ® RACE 5'/3' Kit (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. PCRs were performed in a 50 µl reaction volume using Q5 High-Fidelity 2× Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). The DNA fragments obtained from the PCRs were sequenced and aligned to obtain the full-length open reading frame (ORF) of PPH. The ratio between non-synonymous and synonymous nucleotide substitutions (Ka/Ks) was calculated using DNAsp5 software (http://www.ub.edu/dnasp/) (Librado and Rozas, 2009) for selected pairs of homologous genes. The cis-element analysis of selected PPH promoters (-2000 bp from the transcription initiation site) was performed using the PLACE website (http://www.dna.affrc.go.jp/PLACE/) (Higo et al., 1999).

Subcellular localization of LpPPH
Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts were isolated from mature leaves of 6-week-old plants following the procedure described in Endler et al. (2006). The 3'-green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged LpPPH was transformed into protoplasts using 20% polyethylene glycol, then incubated in the dark at 22 °C for 36 h, and examined under a Zeiss LSM 780 laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss SAS, Jena, Germany). GFP fluorescence images were viewed at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm, and the emission signal was recovered between 495 nm and 530 nm according to published procedures (Schelbert et al., 2009). Chl autofluorescence was viewed between 643 nm and 730 nm.

Transient overexpression of LpPPH in wild tobacco
Mature leaves of 4-to 6-week-old wild-type tobacco plants were used for the experiment applying the method described previously (Yang et al., 2001). Briefly, Agrobacterium strain AGL1 harboring pEarleyGate103 with or without the target gene was injected into a tobacco leaf at the concentration of OD 600 =0.6. After injection, the tobacco leaves were excised and incubated on wet filter paper at 25 °C in the dark for up to 6 d. This experiment was repeated three times, each time with at least three biological replicates.

Arabidopsis mutant complementation assay
The homozygosity of the pph mutant of Arabidopsis was confirmed with three sets of primers, given in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online. The standard floral dip method was applied for transformation (Clough and Bent, 1998). Putative transgenic lines were selected on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with 20 mg l -1 glufosinate, and were further verified by PCR. For the Arabidopsis senescence assay, detached leaves (numbers 4-6) of 28-day-old plants were excised and incubated on wet filter paper at 22 °C in total darkness for up to 6 d.

Analysis of gene expression with real-time RT-PCR
Total RNAs were extracted using an RNA cleaning kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. After DNA digestion with TURB DNA-free™ (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA), first-strand cDNA was synthesized using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Grand Island, NY, USA). For semi-quantitative RT-PCR, the reaction was performed in a 20 μl reaction volume using PCR super mix (Life Technologies) for 26 cycles. Primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online, with ACTIN2 as the reference gene.
For qRT-PCR, the reaction was performed in a 20 μl reaction volume with power SYBR ® Green PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystems) using Roche Light Cycler ® 480 II Real-Time PCR Systems. All reactions were performed with two technical and three biological replicates. Primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table S1. eIHF4A and TEF1 were used as reference genes (Huang et al., 2014).

Statistical analysis
Data in this study were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and the means were compared by the LSD and Duncan test at a significance level of 0.05 by using SPSS (version 12, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data are expressed as means ± SE.

RACE-PCR cloning and phylogenetic analysis of LpPPH
According to the nucleotide sequence alignment between OsPPH and BdPPH, a pair of primers was designed to amplify a conserved sequence fragment of PPH from the cDNA derived from senescent leaves of ryegrass. The fulllength coding sequnce (CDS) of LpPPH (GenBank accession no. KT345726), obtained using 5'-and 3'-RACE-PCR, encodes a deduced protein of 488 amino acids, with a pI of 6.55 (ExPASy server, http://web.expasy.org/computepi/) and the conserved domain of α/β hydrolases (InterPro IPR029058; PLN02824) (Schelbert et al., 2009) (Fig. 1).
A phylogenetic tree of LpPPH and six PPH orthologs of different plant species was constructed (Fig. 1A), in which the phylogenetic relationship between the PPHs was consistent with that of the plant species, indicating that the cloned LpPPH should be the functional pheophytinaseencoding gene. The cloned LpPPH shared 87.9, 82.0, and 62.1% nucleotide sequence identity with BdPPH, OsPPH, and AtPPH, respectively. Based on the phylogenetic relationship of the PPH orthologs, the synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates were further compared between the closely related pairs, demonstrating that all PPH genes were under purifying selection (Ka/Ks <1) (Table 1).

LpPPH localized in chloroplasts
LpPPH protein was predicted to have a 72 amino acid chloroplast transit peptide at the N-terminus without a significant transmembrane domain using the ChloroP1.1 (Emanuelsson et al., 1999), pSORT (Horton et al., 2007), and TMHMM servers, respectively (the prediction result of pSORT is presented in Table 2). Transient overexpression of LpPPH fused with a GFP tag at the C-terminus in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts confirmed that LpPPH was localized in chloroplasts (Fig. 2). Because LpPPH was predicted to contain no transmembrane domain, it may be mainly localized in the chloroplast stroma.

Overexpression of LpPPH induced leaf senescence in wild tobacco and complemented the Arabidopsis pph mutant phenotype
In order to confirm the function of LpPPH in regulating leaf senescence, the transient overexpression of this gene in wild tobacco and a complementation assay of the Arabidopsis pph mutant were performed using both LpPPH and AtPPH driven under control of the Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. The transient overexpression of 35S:LpPPH and 35S:AtPPH both accelerated leaf senescence and resulted in a significantly lower Chl content and Chl a/Chl b ratio than those of the controls (Fig. 3).
For pph mutant complementation assay, three T 2 homologous transgenic lines of each gene (35S:LpPPH/pph-1, -3, and -12, and 35S:AtPPH/pph-2, -8, and -15) were compared together with the wild type and pph controls (Fig. 4). After 6 d of dark treatment, the detached leaves of the Arabidopsis pph mutant showed the stay-green phenotype, while Col-0 and all transgenic lines exhibited severe leaf Chl degradation (Fig. 4). Moreover, the expression levels of LpPPH and AtPPH were negatively correlated with Chl content in leaves of each transgenic line (Fig. 4C, D). In addition, LpPPH also rescued the stay-green phenotype of the seedpods of the Arabidopsis pph mutant (Fig. 5). Taken together, these results demonstrated that LpPPH complemented the phenotype of the Arabidopsis pph null mutant and shared the same functionality with AtPPH.

Increasing transcript levels of LpPPH in senescent leaves
Our previous test showed that the leaf of the tested ryegrass variety reached its full length and highest Chl content at 12 d after leaf emergence, and Chl content declined thereafter (data not shown), indicating that those leaves reached full maturation at 12 d after emergence. Therefore, in this study, changes in Chl content and LpPPH transcript level were examined during leaf senescence using the 12-day-old mature leaves (referred to as mature leaf) as the starting material (Fig. 6A). The transcript level of LpPPH did not significantly change during the early phase of leaf senescence (Chl declined by 32% from 3.4 mg g -1 FW to 2.3 mg g -1 FW), but significantly increased to the highest level when Chl decreased by 82% (from 3.4 mg g -1 FW to 0.6 mg g -1 FW) (Fig. 6B). The transcript level of LpPPH was also analyzed in different plant organs. The expression level of LpPPH was barely detectable in roots, and was relatively low in stems or leaf sheaths (Fig. 7C). The LpPPH gene had a ~30-and 80-fold higher expression level in leaves at early and late senescence stages (32 d and 36 d after leaf emergence), respectively, than in stems or in leaves at the expanding stage (6 d after leaf emergence) (Fig. 6C).

LpPPH is transcriptionally induced by ABA and ethephon, and suppressed by cytokinin and AVG
The analysis of promoters of PPH genes from five sequenced plant species demonstrated that all these PPH genes had multiple cis-elements involved in ABA or CK regulatory pathways. For example, ABRE (MACGYGB) and ACGT (G/ AACGTC/T) are the core DNA-binding sequences for ABI3 and ABF4, respectively, and both transcription factors are in     the ABA regulatory pathway. ARR1AT (NGATT) is the core sequence recognized and bound by Arabidopsis response regulators (ARRs), the transcription factors in the two-component CK signaling pathway (Fig. 7). In addition, a number of abiotic and biotic stress-responsive cis-elements were also found in all five PPH promoters, including a CCAAT box (heat shock element, CCAAT), a DRE (dehydration response element, RCCGAC), MYBCore (AtMYB1/2 DNA-binding site in response to water stress, CNGTTR), MYCATERD1 (MYC recognition sequence necessary for expression of erd1, and which can be bound by certain stress-inducible NAC proteins, CATGTG), and PRE (proline-and hypoosmolarityresponsive element, ACTCAT) ( Fig. 7; Supplementary Table  S2 at JXB online).  The test with exogenous treatment of leaves with ABA, ethephon, AVG, or 6-BA demonstrated that 6-BA and AVG significantly delayed leaf senescence, as manifested by increased Chl content and plasma membrane stability (or increased EL), and F v /F m ; in contrast, ABA and ethephon treatment significantly accelerated leaf senescence, with leaves showing more a severe decline in Chl and F v /F m but increased EL (Fig. 8). Consistent with the pattern of physiological changes during leaf senescence, 6-BA and AVG significantly suppressed the expression of LpPPH, but ABA and ethephon significantly induced its expression (Fig. 8).

Discussion
A number of genes involved in the Chl degradation pathway were cloned from different plant species in recent years (review by Christ and Hörtensteiner, 2014). The PPH genes have been cloned from different plant species, such as Arabidopsis (Schelbert et al., 2009;Ren et al., 2010), rice , and bamboo (Bambusa emeiensis) (Wei et al., 2013), but not previously reported in perennial grass species. In this study, the PPH gene from perennial ryegrass was cloned and its function was confirmed. All PPHs have the conserved PPH motif (VYIA/VGNSL) (Schelbert et al., 2009) in which the serine residue carries out the nucleophilic attack of the substrate for the hydrolytic enzymatic activity (Dodson and Wlodawer, 1998), although LpPPH only shared 87.9, 82.0, and 62.1% nucleotide sequence identities with BdPPH, OsPPH, and AtPPH, respectively. Transient expression of LpPPH fused to a GFP tag demonstrated that LpPPH was localized in the chloroplast, and the lack of a transmembrane domain in LpPPH further suggested that this protein may be mainly localized in the chloroplast stroma, which is consistent with the finding for AtPPH (Schelbert et al., 2009). The synonymous and non-synonymous nucleotide substitution ratio (Ka/Ks) of <1.0 between the closely related PPH pairs demonstrated that PPH genes were under purifying selection (Librado and Rozas, 2009). Homologous characterization suggested that LpPPH from perennial ryegrass could share the conserved roles of PPH with other plant species in dephytylating Mg-free Chl during Chl catabolism.
The functionality of LpPPH was further confirmed experimentally with transient overexpression in wild tobacco and pph complementation assay in Arabidopsis. Overexpression of LpPPH resulted in leaf chlorosis in wild tobacco, while LpPPH rescued the stay-green phenotype in Arabidopsis pph null mutants. Furthermore, qPCR analysis demonstrated that the expression level of LpPPH was positively related to the greater extent of natural or dark-induced leaf senescence in perennial ryegrass, as manifested by the ~30-and 80-fold higher expression level in leaves at the early and late senescence stage in association with the decline in Chl content and increases in cell membrane stability. The association of increasing transcript levels of OsPPH with leaf senescence has also been reported in rice . Our results strongly demonstrated that LpPPH served a function in Chl catabolism in perennial ryegrass, which could be manipulated to generate the stay-green trait that is desirable for perennial grass.
Further tests of LpPPH expression and physiological changes during leaf senescence in response to ethephon, AVG, ABA, and CK treatments showed that ethephon and ABA accelerated leaf senescence, and AVG and CK suppressed leaf senescence, which corresponded to up-regulated LpPPH and down-regulated LpPPH, respectively. This result supported that PPH is transcriptionally activated during leaf senescence and is regulated by sensing hormonal cues. The computational analysis of the cis-element components of five PPH genes showed that the PPH promoters shared conserved core nucleotide sequences potentially recognized by transcription factors in the ABA and CK signaling pathways, including ABRE, ACGT, and ARR1AT. ABRE and ACGT are the downstream core nucleotide sequences recognized by ABI3 and ABF4, respectively (Simpson et al., 2003;Nakashima and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2006), and both transcription factors are in the ABA regulatory pathway. The ACGT cis-element was also found in the promoter of another Chl degradation gene, AtNYC1, and was shown to be the DNA sequence targeted by ABF4 (Nakajima et al., 2012). ARR1AT is the DNA recognition site for ARRs (Sakai et al., 2000;Ross, 2004), which are transcription factors in the CK signaling pathway. These results suggested that PPH genes might be transcriptionally regulated by the ABA, ethylene, and CK pathway transcription factors. The identities of these transcription factors and their exact nucleotide binding will be experimentally screened and tested in the future. From the combined data of gene expression, phenotypic changes, and the analysis of cis-elements, we hypothesized that CK suppressed the expression of PPH, probably through the ARR transcription factors by recognizing some of the ARR1AT cis-elements, and thereby circumvented the progress of Chl degradation, whereas ABA induced the expression of PPH, probably either by directly recognition of the ABRE or ACGT cis-elements by ABI3 or ABF4 transcription factors in the ABA pathway or by indirectly recognizing the other cis-elements through downstream abiotic stress-inducible transcription factors (e.g. MYBs or NACs). The transcription factors involved in ethylene-induced leaf senescence and ethylene-activated PPH expression are as yet unknown. The recent report by Qiu et al. (2015) showed that most Chl catabolism genes but not PPH can be directly targeted by ORE1 in the ethylene signaling pathway. However, the fact that the promoter of the LpPPH gene lacked cis-elements in this study demonstrated that ethylene might not be directly involved in regulating the LpPPH gene through signaling and transcriptional activation. A number of cis-elements involved in abiotic stress were also found in the five PPH promoters in addition to ABA-or CK-responsive elements, including CCAAT box, DRE, MYBcore, MYCATERD1, and PRE. It is of interest that overexpressing DRE-binding proteins (DREBs) led to delayed instead of accelerated Chl breakdown under stressed growth conditions (Morran et al., 2011;Bouaziz et al., 2013). When and how the stress-inducible expression of transcription factors leads to accelerated or delayed Chl breakdown is still not well understood. Liang et al. (2014) found that a NAC protein, OsNAP, can directly bind to the promoter of PPH (NYC3). Yet the DNA-binding site of OsNAP has not yet been identified. The cis-element analysis suggested that the MYCATERD1 sequence that could be recognized by some stress-inducible NAC domain transcription factors (Tran et al., 2004) should be a candidate DNA-binding site recognized by OsNAP. The presence of these conserved cis-elements provides us with a strong clue for identifying important transcription factors that may directly regulate Chl breakdown and for understanding the mechanism of abiotic stress-induced Chl degradation. It remains intriguing to discover the integral regulatory network of Chl catabolism upon the sensing of external and internal cues; for example, senescence-related hormones. Also the mechanisms of and binding specificities for ethylene-, ABA,-or CK-responsive transcription factors that may activate or deactivate PPH expression deserves further investigation.

Conclusions
The LpPPH gene cloned from perennial ryegrass was confirmed to have a function in Chl phytol cleavage hydrolase, which could accelerate leaf senescence, depending on its expression levels, as demonstrated through the transient expression and mutant complementation assays, as well as qPCR analysis. LpPPH-mediated leaf senescence could be regulated by ethylene, ABA, and CK. Potential transcriptional factors in the ABA and CK signaling pathways were proposed as candidate upstream regulators of PPH that will be further confirmed by experimental approaches. The LpPPH gene could be used as a candidate gene by mutagenesis or gene editing techniques to create stay-green perennial grasses.

Supplementary data
Supplementary data are available at JXB online. Table S1. Primers used in this study Table S2. Prediction of PPH promoters and cis-elements.