Volatile compounds—the language of all kingdoms?

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Special Issue Editorial

Biogenic VOCs were detected as herbivore-induced plant signaling cues for the first time in the early 1980s (Baldwin and Schultz, 1983). The discovery by Dicke and Sabelis (1988) of VOC-mediated tritrophic interactions between plants, herbivores, and herbivore enemies started a new field of research that has been growing in many different directions ever since. Now, almost 40 years after the first findings on VOCs' biological and ecological functions in plants, we know how diverse and complex VOC-mediated interspecific interactions can be. In this issue, one example of this complexity is the study of Davidovich-Rikanati et al. (2022) on Pistacia trees (Pistacia palaestina) and the gall-forming aphid Baizongia pistaciae. The authors identified that the aphid is able to reprogram the terpene pathways of the host tree, leading to the characteristic, aphid-protecting high terpene emission from the galls. This is just one example of the diverse functions of VOCs in plantinsect interactions, as reviewed in Zhou and Jander (2022). In recent years, research efforts uncovered an enormous, still largely unexplored, source of additional volatile compounds in the emissions of bacteria and fungi. The high diversity of mVOCs suggests that these compounds play important roles in microbial ecology, both above-and below-ground. Also, in addition to mediating plant-insect interactions, plant VOCs are increasingly shown to function as signaling cues within and between plants as well as between plants, microbes, and even vertebrates (Amo et al., 2013;Brosset and Blande, 2022;Sharifi et al., 2022).

Microbial volatile compounds in interspecific interactions
The various functions of mVOCs as cues mediating microbemicrobe and microbe-plant interactions are highlighted by several contributions in this special issue. Whereas much is known about the chemical nature of plant-derived VOCs, or of those derived from plants and plant organs in interaction with their microbiomes, our knowledge of mVOCs has been significantly improving only recently. In this special issue, Sharifi et al. (2022) review the enormous potential of mVOCs to strengthen plant fitness and growth. Furthermore, Song et al. (2022) report the identification of the mVOCs pyrazine and 2,5-dimethylpyrazine as modulators of plant growth in the emissions of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. These mVOCs inhibit growth of Arabidopsis thaliana plants, potentially as a result of the growth-defense trade-off following activation of salicylic acid (SA)-associated immunity in the same plants (Box 1). While the underlying molecular mechanism remains to be elucidated, Pescador et al. (2022) set out to fill a similar gap in our understanding of induced systemic resistance (ISR; Box 1). The authors observed significant inductions of nitric oxide (NO) in the roots of A. thaliana after their exposure to mVOCs derived from root beneficial fungi of the genus Trichoderma. Intriguingly, Trichoderma mVOC-induced ISR and priming of both SA-and jasmonic acid (JA)-associated defense gene expression in above-ground plant tissues depended on root NO accumulation. This is one of the first demonstrations of a molecular mechanism underlying ISR. Whereas the VOC or the VOC mixture behind the altered resistance remains unknown, previous studies have shown that Trichoderma spp. release a high diversity of various VOCs, among others various terpenoids and typical fungal eight-carbon (C8) VOCs (Guo et al., 2021). The C8 compounds, such as 1-octen-3-ol, are probably the most studied fungal VOCs so far and can cause the typical aroma of some mushroom fruiting bodies (Pennerman et al., 2022). Various fungal C8 VOCs were shown to affect the performance of other organisms, for example by reducing their growth (Pennerman et al., 2022). How the functions of fungal C8 compounds differ from those of other prominent VOC groups, such as terpenes, is not yet elucidated. Fungal terpenoids in particular were recently connected to the ecological functions of fungi in an in vitro study (Guo et al., 2021).
Microbes release not only VOCs but also more simple, inorganic volatiles (Das et al., 2022;Gámez-Arcas et al., 2022). Such small volatile compounds with a molecular weight <45 Da can also have ecological functions mediating interactions between plants, bacteria, and fungi. Gámez-Arcas et al. (2022) review current evidence suggesting that compounds such as NO and CO can signal to the plant about the presence of microbes. It is intriguing that the receiver plant can enhance its photosynthesis and growth upon perceiving these compounds. It remains, however, to be explored which roles the small microbial

Box 1. Induced systemic resistance
Interactions between plant roots and beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere can prime defense responses in above-ground plant parts in a process termed induced systemic resistance (ISR; Pieterse et al., 2014;Vlot et al., 2021;Sharifi et al., 2022). Whereas the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely unclear, above-ground defense priming increasingly appears associated with both SA and JA defense pathways . One particularly well-characterized example of ISR is induced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas simiae, in Arabidopsis thaliana (Pieterse et al., 2021). Similar to Trichoderma-induced ISR reported on in this issue by Pescador et al. (2022), the ISR response can be induced by the volatile emissions of P. simiae without physical contact between A. thaliana roots and bacteria (Martínez-Medina et al., 2013Zamioudis et al., 2015). ISR induced by P. simiae or Trichoderma spp. VOCs depends on the A. thaliana root-expressed transcription factor MYB72 ( Van der Ent et al., 2008;Segarra et al., 2009). In this Special Issue, this MYB72-dependent ISR mechanism in response to Trichoderma VOCs is shown to additionally depend on root NO accumulation acting upstream of MYB72 (Pescador et al., 2022). Together, mVOCs, NO, and MYB72 might be general signaling components of ISR. In this issue, Song et al. (2022) report data which add yet another, intriguing, level of complexity to the interaction of plants with ISR-inducing plant growth-promoting bacteria. In their study VOCs of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens both promote and inhibit A. thaliana growth depending on VOC intensity/concentration at the root surface. Future research is required to further unravel the molecular mechanisms downstream of ISR-inducing mVOCs and the complex, in part antagonistic, responses that are triggered by different VOC concentrations and probably also composition, especially if we also take into account further possible 'interference' by microbiomederived mVOCs.
volatiles play in distinct interspecific interactions compared with more complex VOCs. The functions of small bacterial volatiles seem, however, not to be restricted to promoting plant growth. They may also be involved in improving plant performance indirectly: Das et al. (2022) show that plant growthpromoting bacterial volatiles can have antagonistic properties against phytopathogens. This is illustrated by new findings revealing the effects of Serratia plymuthica volatiles, including ammonia, on membrane integrity of pathogenic fungi. In this interaction, bacterial volatile compounds might thus influence fungistasis in the rhizosphere and by this means potentially in turn also plant homeostasis.

Plant VOCs and sustainable crop protection
Accumulating evidence points to a prominent role for plant VOCs in plant-plant propagation of, for example, defense reactions. When we consider VOC detection in biological systems, insects are known to perceive odors in their peripheral nervous system (Zhou and Jander, 2022). It remains, however, not well understood how plants perceive and respond to distinct VOCs. Nevertheless, studies have revealed altered plant defense upon exposure to mVOCs or to the VOC emissions of neighboring plants (Zamioudis et al., 2015;Martínez-Medina et al., 2017;Riedlmeier et al., 2017;Wenig et al., 2019;Frank et al., 2021). In this special issue, current knowledge on plantplant signaling is reviewed by Brosset and Blande (2022): the authors list altogether 40 different plant-derived VOCs that were proven to alter receiver plant resistance or defenserelated internal signaling. Thus, it seems likely that detection of various VOCs and the subsequent adjustments in plant internal signaling rely on more than one or more specific receptors in plants. Brosset and Blande (2022) discuss current data, which support a different mechanism of VOC recognition in receiver plants, amongst others relying on uptake and subsequent conversion of VOCs to soluble metabolites. Metabolizing VOCs may be an effective functional mechanism of plant-plant signaling as it could allow compound-specific responses in a dose-dependent manner. How the different volatile cues are integrated into a plant response remains to be elucidated.
In addition to acting as signaling intermediates in different biological processes, VOCs are well known for their more 'direct' repellant and attractant properties, which have already found use in sustainable agriculture. A prominent example is the use of VOCs in so-called push-pull systems (Pickett and Khan, 2016;Brilli et al., 2019;Zhou and Jander, 2022). Here, crop plants are grown in intercropping systems, where the VOC pattern of one intercropped plant species deters herbivores, while another species, usually planted on the side of the field, attracts the pest away from the main crop (Pickett and Khan, 2016;Zhou and Jander, 2022). Similar to push-pull intercropping in plant protection from insects, plant-plant or microbe-plant communication could be applied to improve plant performance, for example by priming defense against pathogens (Brilli et al., 2019;Vlot et al., 2021). Lazazzara et al. (2022) suggest in this issue, that viticulture in particular could become more sustainable by applying VOC-based plant protection. Intercropping grapevine with a species that on the one hand can physically support grapevine growth and on the other hand chemically primes the wine defense system against common pathogens could be especially profitable. Similarly, experimental evidence of plant to plant propagation of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) signaling in the cereal crop barley is provided by Brambilla et al. (2022). They suggest that VOC-based sustainable crop protection strategies could also be beneficial for cereal crops, and report that SAR-associated volatile emissions of barley include nonanal and the terpenoid β-ionone.

Future directions
The last 40 years of VOC research have been fascinating, but the coming decades do not seem likely to become less exciting. Combining the information from the articles in this special issue, it becomes evident that intra-and interspecific interactions are driven to a large extent by volatile compounds, and can influence the fitness of both microbes and plants. At the same time, many intriguing questions remain. For example, the evolutionary advantages of the distinct, species-specific VOC patterns remain unclear. In future, the roles of VOCs and full VOC bouquets should be deciphered as near to natural environments as possible (Weisskopf et al., 2021). Indeed, whereas increasingly more is known about the chemical nature of plant and microbial VOCs, experimental restrictions continue to obscure the dynamics and associated diversity of these compounds, especially in the rhizosphere (Sharifi et al., 2022). In future, new experimental designs, such as those suggested by Sharifi et al. (2022), should allow natural gas exchange and the movement of compounds in the free atmosphere or, for below-ground interactions, in soil-like structures.
The data from such approaches should provide insights into VOC dynamics in multi-organism interactions, for example plants interacting with fungi, which each interact with their own microbiome (Box 1). Such approaches can be coupled with simpler laboratory studies, allowing the uncovering of causal links in the functions of VOCs (as suggested by Das et al., 2022). Less attention has so far also been paid to possible connections between plant above-ground and below-ground interactions, including those occurring during ISR (Box 1). Integrated approaches and interdisciplinarity can aid in filling current knowledge gaps and shed light on the principles and causalities that drive VOC-mediated intra-and interspecific interactions in different natural ecosystems.