-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Todd H J Pettigrew, The Christening of Shylock, Literary Imagination, Volume 21, Issue 3, November 2019, Pages 268–284, https://doi.org/10.1093/litimag/imz028
- Share Icon Share
Extract
Readers of The Merchant of Venice have long viewed the forced conversion of the Jewish moneylender Shylock as the most grave injustice of the play. Though no one suggests that Shylock should be allowed to kill Antonio, and therefore Portia and the rest of the Duke are ultimately right to intervene, critics frequently argue that when Shylock, a legal “alien,” is made to publicly revoke his most deeply felt beliefs, the court has overstepped. The desire for kindness and mercy, they argue, has shown itself to be a ruse, and has quickly given way to the imposition of the worst kind of revenge.1 Shylock, by the end of the play, staggers off the stage, humiliated, ruined, and sickened. He disappears from the fourth act as a chastened victim of a society that has neither room nor respect for religious and ethnic diversity. Indeed, in this view, the so-called Christians of the play are both unfeeling and hypocritical, for they pretend to the virtue of forgiveness, but really practice the worst possible cruelty.2