Abstract

Trichodesmium is a globally important marine nitrogen fixing cyanobacteria which forms colonies and utilizes atmospherically derived dust as a source for the limiting micro-nutrient iron. Here we report the identification of metallophores isolated from incubations of natural Trichodesmium colonies collected from the Gulf of Aqaba in the Red Sea. Three of our compounds were identified as the ferrioxamine siderophores B, E, and G. The remaining fifteen metallophores had mass to charge ratios that, to our knowledge, are not common to known siderophores. Putative sum formulas suggest most of these compounds were not structurally related to each other. We also found that the novel metallophores readily formed complexes with aluminium and were less specific for iron than the ferrioxamines. In our incubations of Trichodesmium colonies, the abundance of ten of the novel metallophores positively correlated with Trichodesmium biomass, but not with bacterial biomass, whilst ferrioxamine siderophores were more strongly associated with bacterial biomass. We identified ferrioxamines and our novel metallophores in filtered surface seawater samples from the Gulf of Aqaba. However, our novel metallophores were only observed in the surface seawater sample collected at the time of highest Trichodesmium abundance, while ferrioxamines were observed even when Trichodesmium was not present. We hypothesize that the novel metallophores were specifically associated with Trichodesmium colonies. Together with the bacterially produced ferrioxamines they likely contribute to a distinctive “ligandosphere” surrounding the Trichodesmium colonies, with potential implications for metal homeostasis within the colony environment.

Graphical Abstract

Colonies of the marine diazotroph Trichodesmium host a complex microbial population. We show that colony consortia produce metallophores that likely influence the bioavailability of the trace nutrient iron within the colony microenvironment.

Significance to metallomics

Here we use high performance liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution – mass spectrometry in order to identify novel metallophores produced by the microbial consortium associated with field populations of the marine diazotroph Trichodesmium erythraeum. Metallophores are identified via metal isotope profiling and are shown to bind with iron, gallium and aluminium. We discuss our results in the context of metal speciation and bioavailability, given that Trichodesmium has a high iron requirement and typically lives in low iron surface waters of the open ocean.

Introduction

Trichodesmium sp. occur throughout the tropical oligotrophic surface ocean, make a significant contribution to the supply of new nitrogen to the surface waters,1,2 and are key players in determining the balance in the nitrogen budget of the world’s ocean.1,3  Trichodesmium has a high requirement for the essential micro-nutrient iron (Fe),4 which is typically present at very low concentrations (<0.2 nmol L−1) in open ocean surface waters.5  Trichodesmium is thought to adopt a number of strategies that include exploitation of Fe derived from atmospheric dust and optimisation of nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis in order to obtain and efficiently utilise Fe in the open ocean.6–8 Maintenance of photosynthesis at the cost of nitrogen fixation (diazotrophy),7 has been shown to reduce Fe requirements and thus may allow Trichodesmium to survive even long term periods of Fe limitation. However, since such strategies are typically associated with a reduction in nitrogen fixation, they have the potential to negatively impact on the ability of Trichodesmium to occupy its critical diazotrophic niche within a mixed community.

Exploitation of nutrient pools with more limited bioavailability, such as mineral or colloidal Fe,6 likely extends the geographical range of Trichodesmium and allows it to successfully exploit ecological niches that are nitrogen limited, but have a supply of mineral Fe from e.g. atmospheric dust deposition.9,10  Trichodesmium has been shown to actively acquire and shuttle mineral dust to the centre of colonies,6 and colloidal Fe has been shown to be taken up by Trichodesmium.11 Thus, an ability to move particles within a Trichodesmium colony allows for exploitation of Fe from mineral particles.6 However, the mechanism by which Fe is mobilized from dust is not fully understood. Likely multiple pathways exist that include reductive dissolution and ligand assisted dissolution of Fe from particles. Reductive dissolution can occur within the colony via transient increases in reductive potential.12 Furthermore, colonies foster a cohort of associated microbes with potential for mutualistic interactions13,14 and consequent increased metabolic potential for exploitation of dust derived minerals.15  Trichodesmium colonies thus provide a unique habitat within which mineral Fe can be solubilised by heterotrophic bacteria via production of ferrioxamine siderophores15 and thereby made available to both Trichodesmium and its microbial consortium in a potential Fe-for-carbon and/or nitrogen (C/N) trade off.16 Such strategies likely contribute to a higher abundance of Trichodesmium observed in regions receiving enhanced atmospheric Fe inputs from desert dust, such as the tropical North Atlantic, South China Sea and Red Sea/Gulf of Aqaba.3

We have shown that heterotrophic bacteria within the Trichodesmium colony environment can produce ferrioxamine siderophores,17 confirming molecular evidence suggesting siderophore production by colony consortia.13,14 However, Trichodesmium colony consortia also produce exopolymeric substances (EPS), with increased production observed under Fe stress and during bloom termination.18,19 Since EPS also impact Fe biogeochemistry,20,21 it is possible that further unknown metallophores are present within the complex EPS-rich environment of the Trichodesmium colony and that these metallophores play a role in ligand assisted dissolution of iron minerals.

Here we use metal isotope profiling (MIP) to identify novel high affinity Fe-binding compounds associated with Trichodesmium colonies. Metal isotope profiling is being increasingly applied to the identification of siderophores and other metallophores in natural samples and cultures,22–25 where low metallophore abundance restricts the utility of more traditional assay approaches. MIP incorporates software driven mining of high resolution electrospray ionisation mass spectra to identify metallophores from the distinct isotopic signatures of the metal complexes.23,24,26–28 The sensitivity of the method is enhanced either via enrichment with stable isotopes, via metallophore binding with metals with distinctive natural isotopic ratios22,29 or via combination with a metal specific detection method such as inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.25 These approaches have shown that extensive suites of metallophores can be present in the marine26,30–32 and other environments.33–37

We applied MIP to extracted supernatants of incubated Trichodesmium colonies in order to identify unknown metallophores associated with the colony consortia. Natural Trichodesmium tuft-shaped colonies were collected from the Gulf of Aqaba (GoA) on four separate occasions in 2016 and 2017 and incubated over 1 to 3 days. Supernatant extracts were screened for Fe binding metallophores by exchanging Fe for gallium (Ga), which has a distinctive isotopic signature and thus facilitates siderophore identification.22 We characterised detected metallophores using predicted sum formulas, hydrophobicity and relative affinity for aluminium (Al) a competing trivalent metal ion, which is often present at higher concentrations than iron in the marine environment.38 We investigated the relationship between the relative abundance of the metallophores, Trichodesmium and associated bacteria in an effort to decipher the source of the metallophores. Furthermore, we added atmospherically derived dust sourced from the Gulf of Aqaba39 to our colonies to assess the influence of this potential source of mineral Fe on the abundance of metallophores in incubations. We hypothesized that addition of an Fe source of low natural bioavailability would increase production of metallophores, particularly siderophores.17 Finally, we screened surface seawater sampled from the GoA at times of high and low Trichodesmium abundance to assess if these novel metallophores have the potential to influence bulk seawater Fe biogeochemistry in regions that experience Trichodesmium blooms.

Experimental

Reagents

High purity water (18.2 mΩ cm−1, Millipore) was used throughout. Incubation flasks were made from polycarbonate (1 L, Nalgene, Thermo Scientific) and were acid washed in 0.1 mol L−1 hydrochloric acid and microwave sterilised40 prior to use. All sample handling and manipulations were performed under high efficiency particle air filters in order to minimise metal and microbial contamination (HEPA laminar flow hood). Metallophores were extracted from solution using 200 mg hydroxylated polystyrene-divinylbenzene solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges (3 mL, 90 μm particle size, 800 Å pore diameter, Isolute ENV+, Biotage). All solvents were of liquid-chromatography – mass spectrometry grade (Optima, Thermo). Metals for isotope profiling were obtained as single element standards in nitric acid (0.3 mol L−1 HNO3, Inorganic Ventures). Other reagents were purchased from Thermo Scientific, except where otherwise stated.

Incubations of natural Trichodesmium colonies

Trichodesmium colonies were sampled from the pier at the Inter-University Institute, Eilat on April 20th (GoA-1), May 1st (GoA-2a) and May 2nd (GoA-2b) in 2016 and on May 7th (GoA-3) in 2017. Samples were collected when Trichodesmium was observed in high abundance (i.e. as a bloom) at the sea surface (Fig. S1a, ESI). Trichodesmium blooms were formed during a calm sea-state (Table S2, ESI) but dissipated rapidly with a change in wind or tide, so that the surface presence of blooms was typically ephemeral and lasted only 20–30 minutes. The blooms typically occurred as pronounced stratification developed in the GoA following winter mixing.

The Trichodesmium colonies were scooped into acid-cleaned wide mouthed 20 L high density polyethylene plastic containers, which were capped immediately after sampling. Sampling in such a manner helped us to gather a high biomass of colonies needed for metallophore detection, whilst minimising colony disruption. However, the transient nature of the blooms restricted replication of treatments for all but one experiment (May 2017, n = 2). To overcome the lack of biological replication within experiments, we repeated our experiments on four separate occasions.

Colonies were hand-picked with a plastic dropping pipette into a Petri-dish filled with filtered (0.2 μm), sterilized seawater (400 W microwave, 15 minutes, FSW). Morphological examination of the samples under stereoscope showed that colonies were dominated by needle shaped tufts of Trichodesmium erythraeum colonies (Fig. S1, ESI). Colonies were resuspended in 500 mL filtered seawater (FSW) in incubation flasks. Once all colonies had been added to the FSW, the flasks were gently mixed. One flask was sacrificed for detection of metallophores at the initial time point. For GoA-1, three further flasks were prepared. One was incubated for 24 hours following resuspension. After 24 hours, atmospherically derived mineral dust known to contain ca. 2 mg g−1 of Fe and ca. 3 mg g−1 Al in the acetic acid leachable fraction39 was added to another flask at a concentration of 1 mg dust L−1, whilst the remaining flask was left as a control. The flasks were then incubated under 100 μmol m−2 s−1 light (12:12 h photoperiod) at 25 °C for a further 48 hours before filtration and extraction of siderophores. For further experiments, dust was added to one or two flasks immediately after resuspension, with a further one or two flasks left as controls, and incubations were kept to 24 hours. For each incubation set, ca. 5 mL was preserved with 2% glutaraldehyde (v/v) for determination of bacteria and trichome concentrations at initial and final time points. To count bacteria, 2 mL of preserved sample was vortexed to disrupt Trichodesmium colonies, stained with 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole and filtered on a black 0.22 μm polycarbonate filter (Whatman). Filters mounted on slides were imaged at 100× using a Nikon Eclipse-Ci epifluorescent microscope. Trichome counts were conducted using a Sedgewick-Rafter Cell (Pyser-SGI) under bright-field, using 10–20× magnification.11

Preconcentration and analysis of metallophores

Approximately 500 mL of incubated seawater was filtered (0.2 μm, 25 mm PVDF sterile syringe filters, Millex®GV) and pumped over the SPE cartridge using a peristaltic pump at ambient seawater pH (∼8), at a flow rate of approximately 3–5 mL min−1. After preconcentration, cartridges were flushed with air and frozen at −20 °C prior to shipment to GEOMAR. Once defrosted, cartridges were washed with 5 mL 10 mmol L−1 (NH4)2CO3 adjusted to pH 8–8.3 by addition of formic acid. Metallophores were then eluted with 5 mL 81 : 14 : 5 : 1 (vol : vol : vol : vol) acetonitrile : propan-2-ol : H2O : formic acid.30 A 2 mL aliquot was then evaporated to ca. 150 μL and diluted with 600 μL 0.1% formic acid. We used a low pH (ca. 2.5) in the final solution because our study focused on high affinity metallophores. Weights were recorded at each extraction and evaporation step to allow for determination of a preconcentration factor, given a density of 0.9 g mL−1 for the elution solvent at room temperature (21 °C). Matrix effects and recovery efficiencies were not accounted for, with previous work suggesting a recovery efficiency of ca. 40% for ferrioxamine B.30 Each sample was split into 6 × 100 μL aliquots. Aliquot #1 was analysed directly. 5 μL of a 10 000 mg L−1 solution of Ga was added to aliquot #2, 5 μL 0.01 M freshly made FeCl3 was added to aliquots #3, #4 and #5 and 10 μL 1000 mg L−1 Al added to aliquot #6. All aliquots with metal additions were allowed to equilibrate overnight. The following day, further additions of ferrioxamines B (Sigma), G and E (EMC Microcollections) were made to aliquots #4 and #5 to allow for quantification of ferrioxamines by standard addition.

All aliquots were analysed by high performance liquid chromatography – electrospray-ionisation – high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS, Ultimate 3000 UHPLC, Q-Exactive ESI-MS, Thermo Scientific). Eluants were (A) 0.1% formic acid with 5% methanol and (B) 0.1% formic acid in methanol.30 Separation was performed using a 100 × 2.1 mm polystyrene-divinylbenzene column (Hamilton PRP, 5 μm particle size) at a flow rate of 400 μL min−1. A linear gradient of 0% A to 100% B over 10 minutes was used and the sample injection volume was 25 μL. For detection by ESI-MS, source conditions were set to an ionisation voltage of +3.5 kV, a capillary temperature of 350 °C, a sheath gas flow rate of 35 arbitrary units and an auxiliary gas flow rate of 10 arbitrary units. The heated ion source temperature was set to 300 °C. The HPLC flow was diverted to waste during elution of the solvent front (0–0.8 min) and data acquired from 0.8–11.8 min. The MS detector acquired data between 275–1500 m/z or 350–1500 m/z in centroid mode. We used an AGC target of 3 × 106 ions and a maximum injection time of 100 ms.

Identification of metallophores

Putative metallophores were identified in aliquots with added Ga from their Ga isotopic signature using Chelomex.24 Chelomex setting were as follows: relative isotopic ratio for 69Ga : 71Ga was set to 0.6 ± 0.1, the relative mass error was set to 2 ppm and the intensity cut off for peaks was 1 × 104 ion counts. A database of [M − 2H + 69Ga]+ masses was constructed for putative metallophores identified in +Ga aliquots in all incubations using the software package R.41 Monoisotopic masses for the 56Fe and Al isotopes were calculated and the mass spectrometry data processing software package MZmine42 was then used to filter putative metallophores according to the presence/absence of metal complexes in the respective +metal aliquots. Thus positive hits were recorded when Ga complexes were only present in +Ga aliquots and Fe complexes were observed in the +Fe aliquots and exchange of Fe for Ga thus confirmed. MZmine was also used to determine peak areas corresponding to 69Ga, 71Ga, 56Fe and 27Al isotopes in all analysed aliquots. We assumed retention time differences between peaks corresponding to different metal complexes would not vary by more than 2 minutes. Settings for mass tolerance, and peak detection cut-off were equivalent to those used for Chelomex. Finally, since the 54Fe isotope was often too low to detect using our settings in MZmine, extracted mass chromatograms and mass spectra of the Fe metallophores were examined in Xcalibur© (Thermo Scientific) to confirm the presence of the corresponding 54Fe isotope.

Sum formula prediction

We used the accurate mass obtained for Al complexes of our novel metallophores at a nominal resolution of 140 000 ppm (at m/z = 200) to calculate the monoisotopic mass. Based on a lack of detectable adducts, we assumed the metallophores were ionised as [M − 2H + Al]+. The monoisotopic mass was then used in combination with 12C : 13C isotopic ratios obtained from averaged mass spectra (n > 10) to predict putative sum formulas within 3 ppm of our calculated monoisotopic masses using the Seven Golden Rules.43 We assumed only carbon, nitrogen, sulphur and hydrogen occurred in our metallophores and further applied reported selection rules with respect to double bond equivalents (DBE must be an integer >0) and the relationship between DBE and O to eliminate unlikely sum formulas.33 Mass spectra of sum formulas predicted to contain S were checked for observed and predicted abundance of the 12C34S isotope to further support or eliminate S content.

Analysis of metallophores in surface seawater samples

For ambient seawater samples, 1 L seawater was directly subsampled from the 20 L high density polyethylene plastic containers and filtered (0.2 μm, 25 mm PVDF sterile syringe filters, Millex®GV) into polycarbonate flasks (Nalgene). Samples were immediately preconcentrated at ambient seawater pH within 2 hours of sampling and processed as for preconcentration of metallophores from incubations.

Statistical approach

Since we were unable to carry out biological replicates for all but one of our experiments, and the biomass we were able to collect for each experiment varied considerably, we cross correlated metallophore abundance with bacterial and Trichome numbers across all our treatments and experiments (n = 13), using the R package corrplot.44 Clustering was carried out according to the hclust function in R using the complete linkage method.

Results and discussion

Identification of metallophores associated with Trichodesmium colonies

We undertook four incubation experiments in the Gulf of Aqaba in the spring of 2016 (April 20, May 01, May 02) and 2017 (May 07) to identify metallophores associated with natural Trichodesmium colonies. We used the distinctive isotopic signatures of Ga and Fe to identify 18 compounds that occurred in our incubations (Table 1 and Fig. S2, ESI). The metallophores were not present in the filtered seawater used in the incubations (Fig. 1). We also tested the supernatant of stationary phase Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101 filaments grown in culture and did not observe any of these metallophores (Fig. S3, ESI). We therefore conclude that the metallophores identified here are specifically associated with harvested natural Trichodesmium colonies and may thus be produced as a result of colony formation and/or microbiome composition.

Table 1

Mass to charge ratios (m/z), retention time and predicted sum formula or identity of the Fe complexes for metallophores identified in incubations of Trichodesmium erythraeum tuft-shaped colonies. Also provided is the difference between observed and predicted sum formula (Δ ppm)

m/z [M − 2H + Fe]+Retention time (min)Identity/predicted formula [M]Δ ppm
343.9938 (290.08)1.5C11H14N2O80.1
408.0841 (354.16)1.9C14H22N6O50.5
435.0952 (381.18)1.8C15H23N7O50.9
436.079 (382.16)1.9C15H22N6O60.4
450.0584 (396.14)2.5C15H20N6O70.7
526.0811 (472.16)6.9
538.1001 (484.14)4.6C21H24N8O60.1
542.0585 (488.14)1.5C19H20N8O81.2
614.273 (560.35)5.1Desferrioxamine B, C25H48N6O81.5
620.1026 (566.18)4.0C23H34O161.3
654.2676 (600.35)6.8Desferrioxamine E, C27H48N6O90.9
672.2785 (618.36)5.4Desferrioxamine G, C27H50N6O101.4
678.257 (624.34)4.5C30H48N4O100.3
684.120 (630.2)1.1
720.2527 (666.33)2.0C29H46N8O100.4
726.2285 (672.31)1.9C35H48N2O9S2.4
753.2396 (699.32)4.6C33H45N7O102.6
780.2509 (726.33)1.8
m/z [M − 2H + Fe]+Retention time (min)Identity/predicted formula [M]Δ ppm
343.9938 (290.08)1.5C11H14N2O80.1
408.0841 (354.16)1.9C14H22N6O50.5
435.0952 (381.18)1.8C15H23N7O50.9
436.079 (382.16)1.9C15H22N6O60.4
450.0584 (396.14)2.5C15H20N6O70.7
526.0811 (472.16)6.9
538.1001 (484.14)4.6C21H24N8O60.1
542.0585 (488.14)1.5C19H20N8O81.2
614.273 (560.35)5.1Desferrioxamine B, C25H48N6O81.5
620.1026 (566.18)4.0C23H34O161.3
654.2676 (600.35)6.8Desferrioxamine E, C27H48N6O90.9
672.2785 (618.36)5.4Desferrioxamine G, C27H50N6O101.4
678.257 (624.34)4.5C30H48N4O100.3
684.120 (630.2)1.1
720.2527 (666.33)2.0C29H46N8O100.4
726.2285 (672.31)1.9C35H48N2O9S2.4
753.2396 (699.32)4.6C33H45N7O102.6
780.2509 (726.33)1.8
Table 1

Mass to charge ratios (m/z), retention time and predicted sum formula or identity of the Fe complexes for metallophores identified in incubations of Trichodesmium erythraeum tuft-shaped colonies. Also provided is the difference between observed and predicted sum formula (Δ ppm)

m/z [M − 2H + Fe]+Retention time (min)Identity/predicted formula [M]Δ ppm
343.9938 (290.08)1.5C11H14N2O80.1
408.0841 (354.16)1.9C14H22N6O50.5
435.0952 (381.18)1.8C15H23N7O50.9
436.079 (382.16)1.9C15H22N6O60.4
450.0584 (396.14)2.5C15H20N6O70.7
526.0811 (472.16)6.9
538.1001 (484.14)4.6C21H24N8O60.1
542.0585 (488.14)1.5C19H20N8O81.2
614.273 (560.35)5.1Desferrioxamine B, C25H48N6O81.5
620.1026 (566.18)4.0C23H34O161.3
654.2676 (600.35)6.8Desferrioxamine E, C27H48N6O90.9
672.2785 (618.36)5.4Desferrioxamine G, C27H50N6O101.4
678.257 (624.34)4.5C30H48N4O100.3
684.120 (630.2)1.1
720.2527 (666.33)2.0C29H46N8O100.4
726.2285 (672.31)1.9C35H48N2O9S2.4
753.2396 (699.32)4.6C33H45N7O102.6
780.2509 (726.33)1.8
m/z [M − 2H + Fe]+Retention time (min)Identity/predicted formula [M]Δ ppm
343.9938 (290.08)1.5C11H14N2O80.1
408.0841 (354.16)1.9C14H22N6O50.5
435.0952 (381.18)1.8C15H23N7O50.9
436.079 (382.16)1.9C15H22N6O60.4
450.0584 (396.14)2.5C15H20N6O70.7
526.0811 (472.16)6.9
538.1001 (484.14)4.6C21H24N8O60.1
542.0585 (488.14)1.5C19H20N8O81.2
614.273 (560.35)5.1Desferrioxamine B, C25H48N6O81.5
620.1026 (566.18)4.0C23H34O161.3
654.2676 (600.35)6.8Desferrioxamine E, C27H48N6O90.9
672.2785 (618.36)5.4Desferrioxamine G, C27H50N6O101.4
678.257 (624.34)4.5C30H48N4O100.3
684.120 (630.2)1.1
720.2527 (666.33)2.0C29H46N8O100.4
726.2285 (672.31)1.9C35H48N2O9S2.4
753.2396 (699.32)4.6C33H45N7O102.6
780.2509 (726.33)1.8
Fig. 1

Sum of extracted ion chromatograms (a–d) for Fe complexes of all metallophores identified in aliquots after addition of Fe, after normalisation to the volume of seawater extracted. The grey line is the extracted ion chromatogram obtained for filtered seawater prior to addition of colonies. (e–h) Shows retention times of metallophores as a function of mass : charge ratio (m/z). From top to bottom, panels show data obtained for the initial time point in experiments undertaken on (a and e) April 20 (GoA-1), (b and f) May 1 (GoA-2a), (c and g) May 2 (GoA-2b) in 2016 and (d and h) May 7, 2017 (GoA-3).

As recently reported, three of the compounds were identified as well-known siderophores ferrioxamines B, G and E (FOB, FOG and FOE).17 However, fifteen of the metallophores associated with natural Trichodesmium colonies had mass to charge ratios that do not correspond with known siderophores. We used rigorous MIP identification criteria that required exchange between Fe and Ga, and the identification of the isotopic signatures of both metals, as a prerequisite for a positive metallophore identification.23,31 Our criteria reduced a possible 127 hits obtained for the Ga isotopic signature alone to the final list of eighteen compounds exhibiting both Fe and Ga isotopic patterns. The applied criteria reduced the likelihood of false positives but likely excluded some compounds with 54Fe isotopic signatures too low to detect. The number and diversity of metallophores detected in these incubations is thus a conservative estimate of the number of compounds associated with Trichodesmium colonies that are capable of binding metals.

All but one of the novel metallophores eluted earlier than the ferrioxamine siderophores, suggesting they were hydrophilic in nature (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Our novel metallophores have similar retention times to Fe(iii) rhodotoluate, which is a charged siderophore at low pH22 but are much more hydrophilic than marine siderophores with fatty acid chains such as the amphibactins, which are well retained during reverse phase chromatography.31,45 Extracted ion chromatograms (examples shown in Fig. 1a–d) showed that the cumulative sum of the ions eluting at 1.5 and 1.9 min resulted in the two most intense peaks. Although some metallophores co-eluted at 1.5, 1.8 and 1.9 min, the differences in m/z were not consistent with commonly observed adducts46 and so these metallophores were assumed to be distinct. Comparison of ion counts after normalisation to extraction volume (Fig. 1e–g) showed that the compound with m/z = 720.251 produced the highest ion counts overall, although this is not necessarily a reflection of higher concentrations, since ESI-MS ionisation efficiencies differ considerably from ion to ion.

Our method for sum formula prediction allowed us to assign formulas to all but three of the novel metallophores (m/z = 526.081, 684.120, 780.251, Table 1). Predicted sum formulas were rich in oxygen, which is expected for high affinity Fe(iii) binding compounds. Although sum formulas with one or two sulphur atoms were predicted for some metallophores (e.g. m/z = 408.084, 538.100, 684.120, 726.229), sulphur content for all but m/z = 726.229 were ruled out based on closer examination of observed and predicted abundance of the 12C34S isotope. Sum formulas fell within the van Krevelen space occupied by known siderophores28 (Fig. 2a), which provides confidence in our predictions. Increasing number of N along with an increased molecular weight suggests a type of metallophore with a peptide backbone.28 However, sum formulas for all but one of our metallophores with m/z < 550 were relatively nitrogen rich in comparison with known siderophores (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2

Characterisation of metallophores associated with Trichodesmium colonies (a) van Krevelen diagram of predicted sum formulas for ferrioxamine siderophores and novel metallophores identified in this study (solid squares). Open circles are van Krevelen characteristics obtained for a database of known siderophores. (b) Predicted number of N atoms as a function of m/z of the Fe(iii) complex. Filled squares are metallophores identified in this study, open circles are for known siderophores. (c) Ratio of peak areas for the Al complexes to the sum of Fe + Al complexes in the presence of 105 excess Al. Ferrioxamine B, E and G are red and novel metallophores are blue.

Furthermore, two of our metallophores were predicted to have N/C ratios less than those typical for peptides and proteins,47 with one compound (m/z 620.103) predicted to contain no nitrogen. Low N/C ratios are observed in a limited number of characterised catecholate and carboxylate type siderophores (Fig. 2a), however m/z 620.103 was clearly unlikely to be derived from amino acids.

The specificity of pathways employed to synthesize siderophores can result in families of siderophores with the same peptide sequence48,49 and thus the same number of N atoms. It is possible that sum formulas with similar numbers of N atoms are therefore structurally related. We observed that three of our novel metallophores contained 6 N atoms but differed in m/z ratio by a single ethyl or carbonyl group (m/z = 408.084, 436.079 and 450.058). However, we were unable to collect enough MS2 data to support any structural relationship between these metallophores. The remaining novel metallophores could not be related to each other via addition or removal of simple functional groups.

The detection of the unknown Fe and Ga complexes at low pH (samples were stored and analysed at pH < 3) suggests that these metallophores have a high affinity for hard trivalent metals. For example, the known ferrioxamine siderophores detected here have log affinity constants >30 for Fe in aqueous solutions.50 In support of this, we noted that Al complexes were also observed in our chromatograms for many of our metallophores, likely attributable to the presence of background Al in our samples. We confirmed complexation of Al through addition of ca. 105 fold excess of aluminium (final concentration 1 mmol L−1) to our extracts, which resulted in increased abundance for all putative Al complexes. However, even in the presence of excess Al, ion counts for Al complexes of FOB, FOE and FOG only constituted 5 ± 6%, 38 ± 35%, and 2 ± 6% (n = 13) of the summed ion counts for Al and Fe complexes, respectively (Fig. 2c), reflecting the very high affinity of these primary siderophores for Fe compared to other trivalent metals.49,51 In contrast Al complexes made up the major portion of all complexes for the other identified metallophores, since Al ion counts constituted between 66 and 98% of the summed (Fe + Al) ion counts. We therefore suggest that our novel metallophores had a lower relatively affinity for Fe than ferrioxamines.

Metallophores in incubations of Trichodesmium colonies

Our incubations contained different quantities of Trichodesmium colonies and associated bacteria as a result of variability in the natural abundance of Trichodesmium in the GoA at the time of sampling. In April–May of 2016 a large bloom of Trichodesmium tuft-shaped colonies occurred with a peak in abundance on May 2nd (Fig. S1 and Table S1, ESI). High colony abundance in May 2016 allowed us to collect and incubate up to 15 × 105 trichomes L−1 for our GoA-2 experiments, whilst the lower abundance of Trichodesmium in May 2017 meant that GoA-3 incubations started with only 0.17 × 105 trichomes L−1 (Fig. 3a). Numbers of colony associated bacteria also varied between incubations but did not correlate with Trichodesmium (r = 0.32, p > 0.05), with highest initial bacterial counts observed in the GoA-2b experiments (Fig. 3b). For GoA-1, 2a and 3, trichome abundances were relatively stable over the course of the 24 hour incubation, whilst bacterial numbers increased. GoA-2b was different from the other incubations in that both trichome and bacterial numbers decreased over the course of the incubation, by 30 and 60% respectively.

Fig. 3

Abundance of trichomes (a), bacteria (b) and number of metallophores (c) observed at the beginning of incubations (left bars) and after 1 day (right bars) in incubations of natural Trichodesmium erythraeum tuft-shaped colonies in filtered sterilised metallophore free seawater. GoA-1–3 correspond to incubation experiment dates (see Methods for details).

Along with variability in the relative contribution of host versus associated bacteria, we observed some variability in the number of metallophores identified in the incubations. Maximum diversity was associated with the bloom of Trichodesmium erythraeum that occurred in April–May 2016 (GoA-1, GoA-2), and lower numbers of metallophores (3) were observed in the incubations in May 2017 (GoA-3). The variability in metallophore diversity was likely related to Trichodesmium abundance in the incubations, since biomass was also lower in May 2017 than in April and May 2016. The number of metallophores either remained the same or increased slightly over the course of the incubations. We also observed highest overall ion counts for many of the detected masses in GoA-2b (Fig. 1 and Table S2, ESI). Thus, the abundance of the metallophores was also highest in incubations with the highest number of Trichodesmium colonies. We cross-correlated normalised metallophore abundance, trichome and bacterial numbers observed in all our experiments and treatments (n = 13 for each parameter) in order to examine relationships between the metallophores and bulk constituents of the colony consortium. Absolute quantification of unknown siderophores is not possible with ESI-MS. Indeed, even our approach of using variations in relative abundances between samples must be treated with caution, since ion response can vary from sample to sample depending on the presence of other compounds. However, we quantified our ferrioxamine siderophores by standard addition and observed that the ESI-MS response for ferrioxamine B was reasonably consistent across our samples (average response for FOB = 2.0 ± 1.5 × 106 ion counts fmol−1, n = 13). Thus, we think it unlikely that ion responses were influenced too strongly by changes in organic matter composition between incubations.

Hierarchical clustering of the resultant correlation matrix (Fig. S4, ESI) suggested that our metallophores fell into three groups. The largest group designated “Group A” and shown in blue on the x-axis in Fig. 4, contained 10 of our novel metallophores, and compounds in this group significantly correlated with Trichodesmium abundance (r > 0.56, p < 0.05, Fig. S4, ESI). A dominant driver behind the occurrence of Group A was the high abundance of Trichodesmium in the May 2016 experiments. Interestingly, the three novel metallophores with 6 N (m/z = 408.084, 436.079 and 450.058) all fell into this group and strongly correlated with each other (r > 0.92, p < 0.001, Fig. S4, ESI). Furthermore, we noted a weak negative correlation between six of the novel metallophores in Group A and ferrioxamine E (r < −0.56, p < 0.05). A second group designated “Group B” (red on the x-axis in Fig. 4), contained metallophores with m/z 343.994, 538.100, 542.059, and 620.103 and did not significantly correlate with abundances of bacteria or Trichodesmium. We note that this group incorporated the two metallophores with predicted sum formulas with low or no nitrogen (m/z = 343.99, 620.10; Table 1). Although neither Group A or B correlated with overall bacterial numbers, we do not rule out a bacterial source, since total bacterial numbers may not be representative of variability in or activity of individual members of the population.

Fig. 4

Normalised metallophore abundance in Trichodesmium incubations at the start of the incubations, after 1 day (t = 1) and 3 days (t = 3, GoA-1 only) after addition to metallophore free, sterilized, filtered seawater. Abundance of each metallophore was normalized to the maximum observed for that metallophore within each experiment. Metallophore identity (see Table 1) is given on the y axis, and text colour indicates clusters of correlating metallophores. Blue metallophores (Group A) clustered with Trichodesmium biomass, red metallophores (Group B) with each other and purple metallophore (FOX group) with bacteria. GoA-1–3 correspond to incubation experiments undertaken on separate dates (see Methods for details).

Our final group (purple on the x-axis in Fig. 4) included the three ferrioxamine siderophores and the last novel metallophore (m/z = 684.120). We found that FOB and FOG correlated weakly with bacterial numbers (r = 0.66 and 0.59, n = 13, p < 0.05, Fig. S4, ESI), and that FOE correlated with FOB and FOG (r > 0.83, p < 0.001). The novel metallophore m/z = 684.12 correlated more strongly with bacterial numbers (r = 0.79, p < 0.01), FOB and FOG (r > 0.81, p < 0.001). Since all three of the ferrioxamine siderophores fell into this group, we designate this group the FOX group. The clustering of this group with bacterial numbers is consistent with a heterotrophic bacterial source for the FOX group, and indeed we successfully isolated a ferrioxamine E producing bacteria from our Trichodesmium colonies.17

We further examined the impact of incubation conditions (time, added dust) on the abundance of our metallophore groups in an effort to better understand the factors influencing their distributions. We examined changes in metallophore abundance over a period of 72 hours in GoA-1, and at the beginning and after 24 hours in the remaining GoA experiments. Overall the behaviour of the metallophores with incubation time was somewhat variable (Fig. 4). However, it was apparent that many of the novel metallophores were relatively abundant even at the first sampling time point, which occurred within two hours of adding Trichodesmium tuft-shaped colonies to the metallophore-free FSW. Care was taken to try to ensure minimal carry over of ambient seawater associated with the Trichodesmium colonies via washing of colonies in FSW prior to the start of the incubations. Thus, we argue that the high abundance of many of our novel metallophores within 2 hours of adding Trichodesmium colonies in the GoA-2b experiment was mostly due to release of the metallophores from the very high number of colonies we were able collect in this experiment (Fig. 3), although carry over of some metallophores along with ambient seawater cannot be entirely ruled out. Furthermore, we suspect the bloom from which these colonies were sampled was in its final stages, since we observed a rapid subsequent decline in Trichodesmium at the sampling site. Previous work has shown that release of EPS, which may also incorporate metallophores,20,21 is associated with bloom termination and nutrient stress.18,19

Subsequent variability in metallophores is likely then driven by the complex interactions amongst the microbial consortium during the course of the incubations. For example, in the April 2016 experiment (GoA-1), we observed a decrease in Group A metallophores over the course of the incubation. In contrast, FOX metallophores were not detected at the start of the experiment but increased with time so that all FOX metallophores were detectable after 24 hours of incubation and further increased over the subsequent 48 hours (Fig. 4). Quantification of the three ferrioxamine siderophores showed that the final concentration of the sum of ferrioxamine B, E and G came to 1.0 nmol L−1 after 72 hours of incubation, with ferrioxamine E and G making up 90% of the total.17 In this case the increase in the FOX group was consistent with observed increases in bacterial numbers and it is this experiment which largely drives the clustering of bacterial numbers with the FOX group of metallophores and the weak negative correlation between the FOX group and some Group A metallophores.

Experiments undertaken a month later in May 2016 (GoA-2a) resulted in increases in all Group A metallophores over the 24 hour incubation period, whilst incubations started with fresh Trichodesmium colonies just a day later for GoA-2b resulted in no change in Group A metallophores, possibly because abundance was already high at the start of these incubations. The responses of the metallophores are potentially linked to a number of factors related to the natural variability of the harvested colonies that were sampled at different time points in the evolution of the Trichodesmium bloom. Previous work has shown variability in both Fe uptake rates and mineral Fe availability for natural Trichodesmium colonies sampled at separate time points.11,12,17 In addition, both associated bacterial community composition and bacterial numbers are also likely to vary considerably dependent on the phase of the Trichodesmium bloom, the health of the colonies and the sampling location.13,14,52 Such variability was observed in our experiments, where the response of bacteria to the incubation conditions was strongest for the GoA-1 experiment17 and where the longer timescale of the incubation may have been favourable for associated copiotrophic bacteria. In contrast, we observed a decline in both Trichomes and bacterial numbers in the GoA-2b incubations, which corresponded with a reduction in the FOX group metallophores, but not Group A or B metallophores, and which we suspect was due to a more advanced state of the Trichodesmium bloom sampled on this day.

Addition of atmospherically derived dust to the incubations had a variable impact on metallophore abundance. As we have reported earlier, dust appeared to have a positive effect on FOX group metallophores in GoA-1 and GoA-2a17 which we attribute to the ability of copiotrophic bacteria to respond to favourable conditions and increase production of FOX metallophores within the timescale of our experiments. However, for the remaining metallophores, no consistent effects of dust were observed, and further work is required to fully assess the role these compounds might play in interactions between the Trichodesmium and mineral dust trapped within the colony environment.

Occurrence of metallophores in filtered surface seawater samples

We determined metallophore abundance in filtered surface seawater samples in the Gulf of Aqaba at the peak of the Trichodesmium bloom (May 2nd 2016), and in three replicate samples collected in February 2017 (Table 2) when Trichodesmium colonies were absent. We detected 16 out of 18 of the metallophores in our May 2016 sample, which was collected at the same time as we started our GoA-2b incubations, but only 3 metallophores in Feb 2017 when Trichodesmium was not present in the Gulf of Aqaba. Group A and B metallophores were thus all present in our filtered surface seawater sample at the peak of the May 2016 Trichodesmium erythraeum bloom. Whilst of limited extent, our observations of metallophore abundance in filtered surface seawater samples are thus consistent with our incubation results and further support the association of Group A and B metallophores with Trichodesmium tuft-shaped colonies. In contrast, three of the FOX group siderophores were either absent (FOB and the novel metallophore m/z = 684.12), or present at lower concentrations in May 2016 (FOG) compared to February 2017. Ferrioxamine E was observed at similar concentrations in May 2016 and in Feb 2017. Since ferrioxamines E and G were present at a time when Trichodesmium was absent, the occurrence of these siderophores in surface waters of the GoA was not related to Trichodesmium abundance. This finding is consistent with previous findings that the ferrioxamine siderophores are common in surface waters,30,45,53,54 even in regions where Fe concentrations are not sufficiently low to limit phytoplankton growth55 such as the Gulf of Aqaba. Concentrations of ferrioxamine E detected in our study are higher than those reported previously,30,45,53 although our results are consistent with other studies suggesting production of ferrioxamines by copiotrophic bacteria capable of rapidly exploiting carbon sources.53,56

Table 2

Metallophores identified in ambient surface seawater samples collected in the Gulf of Aqaba on May 02, 2016 at a time of high Trichodesmium abundance and on Feb 07, 2017 (n = 3) when Trichodesmium was not detected. Metallophore identities are given in Table 1. Ferrioxamine siderophores were quantified and expressed as concentrations in the ambient seawater after accounting for preconcentration factors, but not preconcentration efficiency. Metallophores newly identified in this study are donated as “Present” or “Not detected”, since they could not be quantified

Metallophore identityMay 2nd 2016Feb 7th 2017
678.26PresentNot detected
526.08PresentNot detected
435.10PresentNot detected
408.08PresentNot detected
436.08PresentNot detected
780.25PresentNot detected
450.06PresentNot detected
720.25PresentNot detected
726.23PresentNot detected
753.24PresentNot detected
538.1PresentNot detected
620.1PresentNot detected
343.99PresentNot detected
542.06PresentNot detected
FOE42 pmol L−141 ± 19 pmol L−1
684.12Not detectedNot detected
FOBNot detected2.1 pmol L−1 (n = 1)
FOG1.4 pmol L−118 ± 8 pmol L−1
Metallophore identityMay 2nd 2016Feb 7th 2017
678.26PresentNot detected
526.08PresentNot detected
435.10PresentNot detected
408.08PresentNot detected
436.08PresentNot detected
780.25PresentNot detected
450.06PresentNot detected
720.25PresentNot detected
726.23PresentNot detected
753.24PresentNot detected
538.1PresentNot detected
620.1PresentNot detected
343.99PresentNot detected
542.06PresentNot detected
FOE42 pmol L−141 ± 19 pmol L−1
684.12Not detectedNot detected
FOBNot detected2.1 pmol L−1 (n = 1)
FOG1.4 pmol L−118 ± 8 pmol L−1
Table 2

Metallophores identified in ambient surface seawater samples collected in the Gulf of Aqaba on May 02, 2016 at a time of high Trichodesmium abundance and on Feb 07, 2017 (n = 3) when Trichodesmium was not detected. Metallophore identities are given in Table 1. Ferrioxamine siderophores were quantified and expressed as concentrations in the ambient seawater after accounting for preconcentration factors, but not preconcentration efficiency. Metallophores newly identified in this study are donated as “Present” or “Not detected”, since they could not be quantified

Metallophore identityMay 2nd 2016Feb 7th 2017
678.26PresentNot detected
526.08PresentNot detected
435.10PresentNot detected
408.08PresentNot detected
436.08PresentNot detected
780.25PresentNot detected
450.06PresentNot detected
720.25PresentNot detected
726.23PresentNot detected
753.24PresentNot detected
538.1PresentNot detected
620.1PresentNot detected
343.99PresentNot detected
542.06PresentNot detected
FOE42 pmol L−141 ± 19 pmol L−1
684.12Not detectedNot detected
FOBNot detected2.1 pmol L−1 (n = 1)
FOG1.4 pmol L−118 ± 8 pmol L−1
Metallophore identityMay 2nd 2016Feb 7th 2017
678.26PresentNot detected
526.08PresentNot detected
435.10PresentNot detected
408.08PresentNot detected
436.08PresentNot detected
780.25PresentNot detected
450.06PresentNot detected
720.25PresentNot detected
726.23PresentNot detected
753.24PresentNot detected
538.1PresentNot detected
620.1PresentNot detected
343.99PresentNot detected
542.06PresentNot detected
FOE42 pmol L−141 ± 19 pmol L−1
684.12Not detectedNot detected
FOBNot detected2.1 pmol L−1 (n = 1)
FOG1.4 pmol L−118 ± 8 pmol L−1

Conclusions

For the first time, we have identified a total of 18 metallophores associated with natural tuft-shaped colonies of Trichodesmium erythraeum. Fifteen of our identified metallophores have not, to our knowledge, been previously described, while the remaining metallophores were identified as the well-known siderophores ferrioxamine B, E and G.

We used multiple strands of evidence to investigate the source and character of the novel metallophores. The apparent hydrophilicity, nitrogen content of predicted sum formulas and affinity for Al suggests that the novel metallophores described here are unlike previously described marine siderophores. Trichodesmium colonies in situ and in incubations produced and released multiple unconnected metallophores that are capable of binding with trivalent metals other than Fe. The variability in sum formulas suggests that our novel metallophores are unlikely to be synthesized by a single metabolic pathway, and furthermore may not be produced by a single microbe within the colony consortium. Nevertheless ten out of our 15 novel metallophores correlated with Trichodesmium filament abundance and we argue that these metallophores are likely to have a more specific association with Trichodesmium, although we found no evidence of these metallophores in our Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS 101 cultures. Since our IMS101 cultures were comprised of filaments, it is possible that colony formation is important for production of these metallophores. Production via microbial remineralisation of e.g. EPS is possible but unlikely for all of the novel metallophores, since 13 out of 15 are nitrogen rich and organic carbon generally becomes nitrogen deplete as it is remineralised.57

In contrast to our novel metallophores, the abundance of the ferrioxamine siderophores B, G and E was not linked strongly to Trichodesmium, and we therefore suggest that the production of these three siderophores in both our incubations and in the ambient seawater could result from the ubiquitous presence of ferrioxamine producing copiotrophic bacteria.13,14,56,58 These bacteria likely opportunistically attach to Trichodesmium and benefit from the carbon and nitrogen produced by Trichodesmium colonies. However, since we have also shown that these siderophores influence Fe dissolution and Fe uptake rates observed in Trichodesmium colonies,17 we suggest that these bacteria nevertheless have the potential to engage in Fe-for-C/N trading within the colony environment.

We conclude that the Trichodesmium colony microbiome supports a distinctive “ligandosphere” a term recently proposed by Deicke et al., 2019 33 to describe the entirety of excreted metal complexing agents and ligands derived from dissolved organic matter within a microbial environment. The association of this “ligandosphere” with Trichodesmium colonies might be expected to have consequences for solubilisation of Fe from atmospheric dust captured by the colony and suggests organic matter associated with Trichodesmium colonies can modify metal speciation with potential consequences for metal availability. In this regard the formation of Al complexes is particularly interesting given that Al can contribute 2% by weight of mineral dust10 and is typically present at higher concentrations relative to Fe in surface seawater influenced by dust deposition.38 Production of distinct suites of metallophores by different components of the colony consortium also raises the potential that these compounds are important for nutrient trade-offs and our work suggests that these metallophores will impact on utilisation of dust as a source of nutrients. Further work is required to further characterise and understand the environmental variability of these metallophores, and their relationship to the potential for Trichodesmium to exploit niche environments and thereby contribute to the ocean’s nitrogen inventory.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by the German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (Grant 1349), the Helmholtz Association and the Israel Science Foundation (Grant 458/15). The authors would like to thank M. Seidel for advice on sum formula assignments.

References

D. G.
 
Capone
,
J. P.
 
Zehr
,
H. W.
 
Paerl
,
B.
 
Bergman
and
E. J.
 
Carpenter
 
Science
,
1997
,
276
,
1221
1229
.

D. G.
 
Capone
,
J. A.
 
Burns
,
J. P.
 
Montoya
,
A.
 
Subramaniam
,
C.
 
Mahaffey
,
T.
 
Gunderson
,
A. F.
 
Michaels
and
E. J.
 
Carpenter
 
Global Biogeochem. Cycles
,
2005
,
19
,
GB2024
.

B.
 
Bergman
,
G.
 
Sandh
,
S.
 
Lin
,
J.
 
Larsson
and
E. J.
 
Carpenter
 
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
,
2013
,
37
,
286
302
.

A.
 
Kustka
,
S.
 
Sañudo-Wilhelmy
,
E. J.
 
Carpenter
,
D. G.
 
Capone
and
J. A.
 
Raven
 
J. Phycol.
,
2003
,
39
,
12
25
.

C. M.
 
Moore
,
M. M.
 
Mills
,
K. R.
 
Arrigo
,
I.
 
Berman-Frank
,
L.
 
Bopp
,
P. W.
 
Boyd
,
E. D.
 
Galbraith
,
R. J.
 
Geider
,
C.
 
Guieu
,
S. L.
 
Jaccard
,
T. D.
 
Jickells
,
J.
 
La Roche
,
T. M.
 
Lenton
,
N. M.
 
Mahowald
,
E.
 
Maranon
,
I.
 
Marinov
,
J. K.
 
Moore
,
T.
 
Nakatsuka
,
A.
 
Oschlies
,
M. A.
 
Saito
,
T. F.
 
Thingstad
,
A.
 
Tsuda
and
O.
 
Ulloa
 
Nat. Geosci.
,
2013
,
6
,
701
710
.

M.
 
Rubin
,
I.
 
Berman-Frank
and
Y.
 
Shaked
 
Nat. Geosci.
,
2011
,
4
,
529
534
.

S.
 
Richier
,
A. I.
 
Macey
,
N. J.
 
Pratt
,
D. J.
 
Honey
,
C. M.
 
Moore
and
T. S.
 
Bibby
 
PLoS One
,
2012
,
7
,
e35571
.

B. A. S.
 
Van Mooy
,
L. R.
 
Hmelo
,
L. E.
 
Sofen
,
S. R.
 
Campagna
,
A. L.
 
May
,
S. T.
 
Dyhrman
,
A.
 
Heithoff
,
E. A.
 
Webb
,
L.
 
Momper
and
T. J.
 
Mincer
 
ISME J.
,
2012
,
6
,
422
429
.

T.
 
Jickells
and
C. M.
 
Moore
 
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.
,
2015
,
46
,
481
501
.

N. M.
 
Mahowald
,
D. S.
 
Hamilton
,
K. R. M.
 
Mackey
,
J. K.
 
Moore
,
A. R.
 
Baker
,
R. A.
 
Scanza
and
Y.
 
Zhang
 
Nat. Commun.
,
2018
,
9
,
2614
.

S.
 
Basu
and
Y.
 
Shaked
 
Limnol. Oceanogr.
,
2018
,
63
,
2307
2320
.

M.
 
Eichner
,
S.
 
Basu
,
M.
 
Gledhill
,
D.
 
de Beer
and
Y.
 
Shaked
 
Front. Microbiol.
,
2019
,
10
,
1565
.

M. D.
 
Lee
,
N. G.
 
Walworth
,
E. L.
 
McParland
,
F.-X.
 
Fu
,
T. J.
 
Mincer
,
N. M.
 
Levine
,
D. A.
 
Hutchins
and
E. A.
 
Webb
 
ISME J.
,
2017
,
11
,
1813
1824
.

K. R.
 
Frischkorn
,
M.
 
Rouco
,
B. A. S.
 
Van Mooy
and
S. T.
 
Dyhrman
 
ISME J.
,
2017
,
11
,
2090
2101
.

S.
 
Basu
,
M.
 
Gledhill
,
D.
 
de Beer
,
S. P.
 
Matondkar
and
Y.
 
Shaked
 
Commun. Biol.
,
2019
,
2
,
284
.

R.
 
Hermenau
,
K.
 
Ishida
,
S.
 
Gama
,
B.
 
Hoffmann
,
M.
 
Pfeifer-Leeg
,
W.
 
Plass
,
J. F.
 
Mohr
,
T.
 
Wichard
,
H.-P.
 
Saluz
and
C.
 
Hertweck
 
Nat. Chem. Biol.
,
2018
,
14
,
841
843
.

S.
 
Basu
,
M.
 
Gledhill
,
D.
 
de Beer
,
S. G.
 
Matondkar
and
Y.
 
Shaked
 
Commun. Biol.
,
2019
,
2
,
284
.

E.
 
Bar-Zeev
,
I.
 
Avishay
,
K. D.
 
Bidle
and
I.
 
Berman-Frank
 
ISME J.
,
2013
,
7
,
2340
2348
.

I.
 
Berman-Frank
,
G.
 
Rosenberg
,
O.
 
Levitan
,
L.
 
Haramaty
and
X.
 
Mari
 
Environ. Microbiol.
,
2007
,
9
,
1415
1422
.

C. S.
 
Hassler
,
V.
 
Schoemann
,
C. M.
 
Nichols
,
E. C. V.
 
Butler
and
P. W.
 
Boyd
 
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
,
2011
,
108
,
1076
1081
.

C. S.
 
Hassler
,
E.
 
Alasonati
,
C. A. M.
 
Nichols
and
V. I.
 
Slaveykova
 
Mar. Chem.
,
2011
,
123
,
88
98
.

P.
 
McCormack
,
P. J.
 
Worsfold
and
M.
 
Gledhill
 
Anal. Chem.
,
2003
,
75
,
2647
2652
.

M.
 
Deicke
,
J. F.
 
Mohr
,
J.-P.
 
Bellenger
and
T.
 
Wichard
 
Analyst
,
2014
,
139
,
6096
6099
.

O.
 
Baars
,
F. M. M.
 
Morel
and
D. H.
 
Perlman
 
Anal. Chem.
,
2014
,
86
,
11298
11305
.

R. M.
 
Boiteau
,
J. N.
 
Fitzsimmons
,
D. J.
 
Repeta
and
E. A.
 
Boyle
 
Anal. Chem.
,
2013
,
85
,
4357
4362
.

M.
 
Gledhill
,
P.
 
McCormack
,
S.
 
Ussher
,
E. P.
 
Achterberg
,
R. F. C.
 
Mantoura
and
P. J.
 
Worsfold
 
Mar. Chem.
,
2004
,
88
,
75
83
.

S. M.
 
Lehner
,
L.
 
Atanasova
,
N. K. N.
 
Neumann
,
R.
 
Krska
,
M.
 
Lemmens
,
I. S.
 
Druzhinina
and
R.
 
Schuhmacher
 
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
2013
,
79
,
18
31
.

T.
 
Pluhacek
,
K.
 
Lemr
,
D.
 
Ghosh
,
D.
 
Milde
,
R.
 
Novak
and
V.
 
Havlícek
 
Mass Spectrom. Rev.
,
2016
,
35
,
35
47
.

M.
 
Deicke
,
J.-P.
 
Bellenger
and
T.
 
Wichard
 
J. Chromatogr. A
,
2013
,
1298
,
50
60
.

E.
 
Mawji
,
M.
 
Gledhill
,
J. A.
 
Milton
,
G. A.
 
Tarran
,
S.
 
Ussher
,
A.
 
Thompson
,
G. A.
 
Wolff
,
P. J.
 
Worsfold
and
E. P.
 
Achterberg
 
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
2008
,
42
,
8675
8680
.

E.
 
Mawji
,
M.
 
Gledhill
,
J. A.
 
Milton
,
M. V.
 
Zubkov
,
A.
 
Thompson
,
G. A.
 
Wolff
and
E. P.
 
Achterberg
 
Mar. Chem.
,
2011
,
124
,
90
99
.

T.
 
Wichard
 
Front. Mar. Sci.
,
2016
,
3
,
131
.

M.
 
Deicke
,
J. F.
 
Mohr
,
S.
 
Roy
,
P.
 
Herzsprung
,
J.-P.
 
Bellenger
and
T.
 
Wichard
 
Metallomics
,
2019
,
11
,
810
821
.

O.
 
Baars
,
X.
 
Zhang
,
F. M. M.
 
Morel
and
M. R.
 
Seyedsayamdost
 
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
,
2016
,
82
,
27
39
.

R. M.
 
Boiteau
,
S. J.
 
Fansler
,
Y.
 
Farris
,
J. B.
 
Shaw
,
D. W.
 
Koppenaal
,
L.
 
Pasa-Tolic
and
J. K.
 
Jansson
 
Metallomics
,
2019
,
11
,
166
175
.

A. M. L.
 
Kraepiel
,
J. P.
 
Bellenger
,
T.
 
Wichard
and
F. M. M.
 
Morel
 
Biometals
,
2009
,
22
,
573
581
.

S. M.
 
Kraemer
,
O. W.
 
Duckworth
,
J. M.
 
Harrington
and
W. D. C.
 
Schenkeveld
 
Aquat. Geochem.
,
2015
,
21
,
159
195
.

J.-L.
 
Menzel Barraqueta
,
J. K.
 
Klar
,
M.
 
Gledhill
,
C.
 
Schlosser
,
R.
 
Shelley
,
H. F.
 
Planquette
,
B.
 
Wenzel
,
G.
 
Sarthou
and
E. P.
 
Achterberg
 
Biogeosciences
,
2019
,
16
,
1525
1542
.

A.
 
Torfstein
,
N.
 
Teutsch
,
O.
 
Tirosh
,
Y.
 
Shaked
,
T.
 
Rivlin
,
A.
 
Zipori
,
M.
 
Stein
,
B.
 
Lazar
and
Y.
 
Erel
 
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
,
2017
,
211
,
373
393
.

W. G.
 
Sunda
,
N. M.
 
Price
and
F. M. M.
 
Morel
, in
Algal Culturing Techniques
, ed.
R. A.
 
Anderson
,
Elsevier
,
2005
,
pp. 35–65
.

R Development Core Team
,
R Found. Stat. Comput.
,
Vienna Austria
,
2016
, {ISBN} 3-900051-07-0.

T.
 
Pluskal
,
S.
 
Castillo
,
A.
 
Villar-Briones
and
M.
 
Orešič
 
BMC Bioinf.
,
2010
,
11
,
1
11
.

T.
 
Kind
and
O.
 
Fiehn
 
BMC Bioinf.
,
2007
,
8
,
105
.

T.
 
Wei
and
V.
 
Simko
, R package “corrplot”: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.84),
2017
, available from https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot.

R. M.
 
Boiteau
,
D. R.
 
Mende
,
N. J.
 
Hawco
,
M. R.
 
McIlvin
,
J. N.
 
Fitzsimmons
,
M. A.
 
Saito
,
P. N.
 
Sedwick
,
E. F.
 
DeLong
and
D. J.
 
Repeta
 
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
,
2016
,
113
,
14237
14242
.

N.
 
Huang
,
M. M.
 
Siegel
,
G. H.
 
Kruppa
and
F. H.
 
Laukien
 
J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom
,
1999
,
10
,
1166
1173
.

A.
 
Rivas-Ubach
,
Y.
 
Liu
,
T. S.
 
Bianchi
,
N.
 
Tolić
,
C.
 
Jansson
and
L.
 
Paša-Tolić
 
Anal. Chem.
,
2018
,
90
,
6152
6160
.

J. M.
 
Vraspir
and
A.
 
Butler
 
Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci.
,
2009
,
1
,
43
63
.

R. C.
 
Hider
and
X. L.
 
Kong
 
Nat. Prod. Rep.
,
2010
,
27
,
637
657
.

A. L.
 
Crumbliss
in
CRC Handbook of microbial iron chelates
, ed.
G.
 
Winkelmann
,
CRC Press Ltd
,
Boca Raton, Florida
,
1991
,
pp. 177–233
.

T. C.
 
Johnstone
and
E. M.
 
Nolan
 
Dalton Trans.
,
2015
,
44
,
6320
6339
.

L. R.
 
Hmelo
,
B. A. S.
 
Van Mooy
and
T. J.
 
Mincer
 
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
,
2012
,
67
,
1
14
.

R. M.
 
Bundy
,
R. M.
 
Boiteau
,
C.
 
McLean
,
K. A.
 
Turk-Kubo
,
M. R.
 
McIlvin
,
M. A.
 
Saito
,
B. A. S.
 
Van Mooy
and
D. J.
 
Repeta
 
Front. Mar. Sci.
,
2018
,
5
,
61
.

R. M.
 
Boiteau
,
C. P.
 
Till
,
T. H.
 
Coale
,
J. N.
 
Fitzsimmons
,
K. W.
 
Bruland
and
D. J.
 
Repeta
 
Limnol. Oceanogr.
,
2019
,
64
,
376
389
.

Z.
 
Chase
,
A.
 
Paytan
,
K. S.
 
Johnson
,
J.
 
Street
and
Y.
 
Chen
 
Global Biogeochem. Cycles
,
2006
,
20
,
GB3017
.

I. B.
 
Velasquez
,
E.
 
Ibisanmi
,
E. W.
 
Maas
,
P. W.
 
Boyd
,
S.
 
Nodder
and
S. G.
 
Sander
 
Front. Mar. Sci.
,
2016
,
3
,
172
.

D. A.
 
Hansell
 
Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci.
,
2013
,
5
,
421
445
.

R. M.
 
Bundy
,
D. V.
 
Biller
,
K. N.
 
Buck
,
K. W.
 
Bruland
and
K. A.
 
Barbeau
 
Limnol. Oceanogr.
,
2014
,
59
,
769
787
.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9mt00121b

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Supplementary data