-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
B-Q For, L Staveley-Smith, N Hurley-Walker, T Franzen, A D Kapińska, M D Filipović, J D Collier, C Wu, K Grieve, J R Callingham, M E Bell, G Bernardi, J D Bowman, F Briggs, R J Cappallo, A A Deshpande, K S Dwarakanath, B M Gaensler, L J Greenhill, P Hancock, B J Hazelton, L Hindson, M Johnston-Hollitt, D L Kaplan, E Lenc, C J Lonsdale, B McKinley, S R McWhirter, D A Mitchell, M F Morales, E Morgan, J Morgan, D Oberoi, A Offringa, S M Ord, T Prabu, P Procopio, N Udaya Shankar, K S Srivani, R Subrahmanyan, S J Tingay, R B Wayth, R L Webster, A Williams, C L Williams, Q Zheng, A multifrequency radio continuum study of the Magellanic Clouds – I. Overall structure and star formation rates, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 480, Issue 2, October 2018, Pages 2743–2756, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1960
- Share Icon Share
ABSTRACT
We present the first low-frequency Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) radio continuum maps of the Magellanic Clouds (MCs), using mosaics from the GaLactic Extragalactic All-Sky MWA (GLEAM) survey. In this paper, we discuss the overall radio continuum morphology between 76 and 227 MHz and compare them with neutral hydrogen maps, 1.4 GHz continuum maps and optical images. Variation of diffuse emission is noticeable across the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) but absent across the bar of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). We also measure the integrated flux densities and derive the spectral indices for the MCs. A double power-law model with fixed α1 = −0.1 fit between 19.7 MHz and 8.55 GHz yields α0 = −0.66 ± 0.08 for the LMC. A power-law model yields |$\alpha _{\rm 8.55 GHz}^{\rm 85.5 MHz} = -0.82\pm 0.03$| for the SMC. The radio spectral index maps reveal distinctive flat and steep spectral indices for the H ii regions and supernova remnants, respectively. We find strong correlation between H ii regions and Hα emission. Using a new 150 MHz–Hα relation as a star formation rate indicator, we estimate global star formation rates of 0.068–0.161 M⊙ yr−1 and 0.021–0.050 M⊙ yr−1 for the LMC and SMC, respectively. Images in 20 frequency bands, and wideband averages are made available via the GLEAM virtual observatory server.
1 INTRODUCTION
The Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC) lie at a distance of about 50 and 60 kpc (Hilditch, Howarth & Harries 2005; Pietrzyński et al. 2013), respectively, and are among the closest extragalactic neighbours of our Galaxy. The close proximity of the Magellanic Clouds (MCs) provides an ideal laboratory for us to probe different physical mechanisms in great detail. Pioneering studies of the MCs in radio continuum emission date back to the 1950s (see e.g. Mills 1955; Shain 1959). Subsequent studies have been carried out to either focus on individual objects (e.g. supernova 1987A; Zanardo et al. 2010 and references therein) or large-scale radio structure and total radio spectrum of the MCs (Haynes et al. 1991 and references therein; Hughes et al. 2007). Aside from radio continuum studies, there have been many other comprehensive multiwavelength studies to date (see e.g. Jameson et al. 2016). Yet, there is more to learn about these nearby galaxies.
Radio continuum studies probe two main astrophysical properties: non-thermal synchrotron emission that is generated by relativistic charged particles accelerated in magnetic fields; and thermal free–free emission from ionized hydrogen clouds (H ii regions; Lisenfeld & Völk 2000). The former partly originates from discrete supernova remnants (SNRs). However, studies have shown that only about 10|${{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| of the non-thermal synchrotron emission is originated from SNRs (Lisenfeld & Völk 2000) and about 90|${{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| probably due to the propagation of cosmic ray electrons throughout the galaxy disc (Condon 1992) over time-scales of 10 to 100 Myr (Helou & Bicay 1993). The origin of these electrons is unknown, but could mostly still be from SNRs and supernova explosions. Free–free emission originates from the thermal ionized gas in general including the diffuse ionized gas, though it is stronger in H ii regions. Since massive stars (M > 8 M⊙) have a relatively short lifetime (<108 yr), this emission therefore traces recent star formation activity.
The intensity of thermal free–free emission is directly proportional to the total number of Lyman continuum photons. In the optically thin regime, the spectrum of a galaxy can generally be described by a power-law function, Sν∝να, where Sν is the radio flux density at a given frequency, ν, and α is the spectral index (or power-law slope). The spectrum is “flat” when α ∼ −0.1. Steep spectra with α ∼ −0.8 are commonly observed in star-forming galaxies (see Marvil, Owen & Eilek 2015 and references therein). Low-frequency turn-over occurs when the optical depth changes from optically thin to optically thick due to absorption process.
With new state-of-the art low-frequency telescopes, such as the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA; Lonsdale et al. 2009; Bowman et al. 2013; Tingay et al. 2013), it is feasible to carry out new continuum surveys with fast survey speeds to probe astrophysical processes at these frequencies. In this paper, we present a multifrequency study of the MCs using data from the GaLactic Extragalactic All-sky MWA (GLEAM) survey (Wayth et al. 2015; Hurley-Walker et al. 2017), the Parkes single-dish radio telescope and radio interferometer data from the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA). In Section 2, we describe the GLEAM observations and data reduction. We show the radio continuum maps of the MCs and discuss their morphology in comparison with the integrated neutral hydrogen (H i) maps and optical images in Section 3. Our analysis and results are presented in Section 4. In Section 5, we derive the global star formation rates. Our investigation of spatial variation of the spectral index among H ii regions, a possible turn-over frequency and the production rates of Lyman continuum photons is described in Section 6. Lastly, we present our conclusions and outlook in Section 7.
2 OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION
The MWA is a low-frequency radio interferometer operating between 70 and 300 MHz. It was designed to have a wide field of view (15°–50°) and a short-medium baseline distance suitable for detecting the faint redshifted 21-cm spectral line emission from the Epoch of Reionization (EoR), as well as supporting a wide range of other astrophysics applications (Bowman et al. 2013). Phase 1 of MWA consisted of 128 32-dipole antenna tiles that spread across an area of ∼3 km in diameter. We refer the reader to Tingay et al. (2013) for technical details.
The GaLactic Extragalactic All-sky MWA (GLEAM) survey is the main MWA continuum survey that covers the sky south of declination +30° with a frequency range of 72–231 MHz split into five separated sub-bands (Wayth et al. 2015). The data were collected in nightly drift scans, where all frequencies for a single declination strip were observed each night. The data reduction process is described in detailed in Wayth et al. (2015) and Hurley-Walker et al. (2017). To summarize, raw visibility data were processed using COTTER (Offringa et al. 2015), which performs flagging and averaging of the visibility data to a time resolution of 4 s and a frequency resolution of 40 kHz. Subsequent calibration involved the creation of a sky model for each observation, “peeling” to minimize sidelobes from the bright sources, and astrometric correction for ionospheric effects. Lastly, a single mosaic per sub-band is obtained by combining all declination strips from each week of observations. A slight apparent blurring of the point spread function (PSF) is noted due to slightly different ionospheric conditions in the 20–40 observations per pixel. To take this into account, PSF maps are created for each mosaic as a function of position on the sky, with three channels whose pixels represented the major axis, minor axis, and position angle.
We employ the final flux calibrated mosaic imaged with robust weighting of 0 (Briggs 1995) for this study because the theoretical noise is lower than standard GLEAM data reduction, and the brightness sensitivity is higher. Uncertainty in the flux density scale mainly arises from the declination-dependent flux density correction. The systematic uncertainty (σscale) is derived as the standard deviation of a Gaussian fit to the residual variation in the ratio of predicted to measured source flux densities. The systematic uncertainties for the studied regions are 8.5|${{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| (LMC) and 13|${{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| (SMC) (Hurley-Walker et al. 2017).
3 RADIO CONTINUUM MAPS OF THE MAGELLANIC CLOUDS
We present a series of selected GLEAM images of the MCs in Fig. 1. Due to varying PSF across the large area of the MCs images, we derive the synthesized beam sizes by averaging the values of the corresponding PSF map of each band for the analysed area. The typical PSF variation across each field is 15–20|${{\ \rm per\ cent}}$|. A summary of the observed central frequency, synthesized beam, pixel area, and average noise level (RMS) for the 20 GLEAM sub-bands images is given in Table 1. We present combined three colour composite images of the LMC and SMC in Fig. 2. Optically thick H ii regions appear to be bluer due to their positive steep spectral index (α ∼ 2; Condon 1992).

Selected radio images of the LMC and SMC from the GLEAM survey. From top left to bottom right are images centred at 92, 115, 143, 166, 189, and 212 MHz. The grey scale is in units of Jy beam−1.

Three colour RGB composite images of the Magellanic Clouds using the combination of 123, 181, and 227 MHz images, respectively. Images are reprojected and regridded to a common projection and angular resolution of 123 MHz images prior to combination. Left: Large Magellanic Cloud in a 10°× 10° image, Right: Small Magellanic Cloud in a 6°× 6° image.
Basic information for the GLEAM images in this study. ν represents the central frequency of the observed sub-band. σ is the average rms of three selected emission free regions. Synthesized beams are derived from the associated PSF map (Section 2).
ν (MHz) . | FWHMLMC (arcsec) . | FWHMSMC (arcsec) . | Pixel Size (arcsec) . | σLMC (Jy beam . | σSMC (Jy beam . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
76 | 471.5 × 411.6 | 495.4 × 455.6 | 61.2 | 0.092 | 0.079 |
84 | 423.5 × 370.5 | 443.0 × 410.2 | 61.2 | 0.056 | 0.059 |
92 | 390.4 × 343.1 | 407.2 × 378.2 | 61.2 | 0.056 | 0.063 |
99 | 367.6 × 319.6 | 380.4 × 353.9 | 61.2 | 0.068 | 0.055 |
107 | 334.5 × 294.5 | 356.8 × 333.0 | 45.4 | 0.041 | 0.041 |
115 | 307.3 × 272.5 | 328.0 × 306.4 | 45.4 | 0.036 | 0.036 |
123 | 289.3 × 256.8 | 309.8 × 288.2 | 45.4 | 0.029 | 0.032 |
130 | 279.6 × 246.6 | 293.4 × 276.2 | 45.4 | 0.030 | 0.032 |
143 | 255.2 × 220.9 | 271.8 × 255.9 | 34.9 | 0.022 | 0.029 |
150 | 240.0 × 208.3 | 254.4 × 239.5 | 34.9 | 0.020 | 0.025 |
158 | 229.3 × 198.8 | 242.6 × 229.3 | 34.9 | 0.019 | 0.026 |
166 | 220.4 × 190.8 | 234.5 × 222.6 | 34.9 | 0.018 | 0.024 |
174 | 212.6 × 184.7 | 224.5 × 212.6 | 29.1 | 0.020 | 0.025 |
181 | 202.4 × 177.2 | 214.4 × 203.4 | 29.1 | 0.018 | 0.021 |
189 | 193.4 × 168.6 | 208.1 × 196.4 | 29.1 | 0.020 | 0.021 |
197 | 188.1 × 163.9 | 202.1 × 189.4 | 29.1 | 0.019 | 0.020 |
204 | 182.0 × 157.9 | 197.2 × 184.5 | 25.0 | 0.018 | 0.019 |
212 | 173.4 × 150.9 | 189.2 × 176.6 | 25.0 | 0.017 | 0.019 |
219 | 169.5 × 147.0 | 183.4 × 170.4 | 25.0 | 0.018 | 0.019 |
227 | 164.8 × 142.9 | 178.9 × 165.6 | 25.0 | 0.017 | 0.019 |
ν (MHz) . | FWHMLMC (arcsec) . | FWHMSMC (arcsec) . | Pixel Size (arcsec) . | σLMC (Jy beam . | σSMC (Jy beam . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
76 | 471.5 × 411.6 | 495.4 × 455.6 | 61.2 | 0.092 | 0.079 |
84 | 423.5 × 370.5 | 443.0 × 410.2 | 61.2 | 0.056 | 0.059 |
92 | 390.4 × 343.1 | 407.2 × 378.2 | 61.2 | 0.056 | 0.063 |
99 | 367.6 × 319.6 | 380.4 × 353.9 | 61.2 | 0.068 | 0.055 |
107 | 334.5 × 294.5 | 356.8 × 333.0 | 45.4 | 0.041 | 0.041 |
115 | 307.3 × 272.5 | 328.0 × 306.4 | 45.4 | 0.036 | 0.036 |
123 | 289.3 × 256.8 | 309.8 × 288.2 | 45.4 | 0.029 | 0.032 |
130 | 279.6 × 246.6 | 293.4 × 276.2 | 45.4 | 0.030 | 0.032 |
143 | 255.2 × 220.9 | 271.8 × 255.9 | 34.9 | 0.022 | 0.029 |
150 | 240.0 × 208.3 | 254.4 × 239.5 | 34.9 | 0.020 | 0.025 |
158 | 229.3 × 198.8 | 242.6 × 229.3 | 34.9 | 0.019 | 0.026 |
166 | 220.4 × 190.8 | 234.5 × 222.6 | 34.9 | 0.018 | 0.024 |
174 | 212.6 × 184.7 | 224.5 × 212.6 | 29.1 | 0.020 | 0.025 |
181 | 202.4 × 177.2 | 214.4 × 203.4 | 29.1 | 0.018 | 0.021 |
189 | 193.4 × 168.6 | 208.1 × 196.4 | 29.1 | 0.020 | 0.021 |
197 | 188.1 × 163.9 | 202.1 × 189.4 | 29.1 | 0.019 | 0.020 |
204 | 182.0 × 157.9 | 197.2 × 184.5 | 25.0 | 0.018 | 0.019 |
212 | 173.4 × 150.9 | 189.2 × 176.6 | 25.0 | 0.017 | 0.019 |
219 | 169.5 × 147.0 | 183.4 × 170.4 | 25.0 | 0.018 | 0.019 |
227 | 164.8 × 142.9 | 178.9 × 165.6 | 25.0 | 0.017 | 0.019 |
Basic information for the GLEAM images in this study. ν represents the central frequency of the observed sub-band. σ is the average rms of three selected emission free regions. Synthesized beams are derived from the associated PSF map (Section 2).
ν (MHz) . | FWHMLMC (arcsec) . | FWHMSMC (arcsec) . | Pixel Size (arcsec) . | σLMC (Jy beam . | σSMC (Jy beam . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
76 | 471.5 × 411.6 | 495.4 × 455.6 | 61.2 | 0.092 | 0.079 |
84 | 423.5 × 370.5 | 443.0 × 410.2 | 61.2 | 0.056 | 0.059 |
92 | 390.4 × 343.1 | 407.2 × 378.2 | 61.2 | 0.056 | 0.063 |
99 | 367.6 × 319.6 | 380.4 × 353.9 | 61.2 | 0.068 | 0.055 |
107 | 334.5 × 294.5 | 356.8 × 333.0 | 45.4 | 0.041 | 0.041 |
115 | 307.3 × 272.5 | 328.0 × 306.4 | 45.4 | 0.036 | 0.036 |
123 | 289.3 × 256.8 | 309.8 × 288.2 | 45.4 | 0.029 | 0.032 |
130 | 279.6 × 246.6 | 293.4 × 276.2 | 45.4 | 0.030 | 0.032 |
143 | 255.2 × 220.9 | 271.8 × 255.9 | 34.9 | 0.022 | 0.029 |
150 | 240.0 × 208.3 | 254.4 × 239.5 | 34.9 | 0.020 | 0.025 |
158 | 229.3 × 198.8 | 242.6 × 229.3 | 34.9 | 0.019 | 0.026 |
166 | 220.4 × 190.8 | 234.5 × 222.6 | 34.9 | 0.018 | 0.024 |
174 | 212.6 × 184.7 | 224.5 × 212.6 | 29.1 | 0.020 | 0.025 |
181 | 202.4 × 177.2 | 214.4 × 203.4 | 29.1 | 0.018 | 0.021 |
189 | 193.4 × 168.6 | 208.1 × 196.4 | 29.1 | 0.020 | 0.021 |
197 | 188.1 × 163.9 | 202.1 × 189.4 | 29.1 | 0.019 | 0.020 |
204 | 182.0 × 157.9 | 197.2 × 184.5 | 25.0 | 0.018 | 0.019 |
212 | 173.4 × 150.9 | 189.2 × 176.6 | 25.0 | 0.017 | 0.019 |
219 | 169.5 × 147.0 | 183.4 × 170.4 | 25.0 | 0.018 | 0.019 |
227 | 164.8 × 142.9 | 178.9 × 165.6 | 25.0 | 0.017 | 0.019 |
ν (MHz) . | FWHMLMC (arcsec) . | FWHMSMC (arcsec) . | Pixel Size (arcsec) . | σLMC (Jy beam . | σSMC (Jy beam . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
76 | 471.5 × 411.6 | 495.4 × 455.6 | 61.2 | 0.092 | 0.079 |
84 | 423.5 × 370.5 | 443.0 × 410.2 | 61.2 | 0.056 | 0.059 |
92 | 390.4 × 343.1 | 407.2 × 378.2 | 61.2 | 0.056 | 0.063 |
99 | 367.6 × 319.6 | 380.4 × 353.9 | 61.2 | 0.068 | 0.055 |
107 | 334.5 × 294.5 | 356.8 × 333.0 | 45.4 | 0.041 | 0.041 |
115 | 307.3 × 272.5 | 328.0 × 306.4 | 45.4 | 0.036 | 0.036 |
123 | 289.3 × 256.8 | 309.8 × 288.2 | 45.4 | 0.029 | 0.032 |
130 | 279.6 × 246.6 | 293.4 × 276.2 | 45.4 | 0.030 | 0.032 |
143 | 255.2 × 220.9 | 271.8 × 255.9 | 34.9 | 0.022 | 0.029 |
150 | 240.0 × 208.3 | 254.4 × 239.5 | 34.9 | 0.020 | 0.025 |
158 | 229.3 × 198.8 | 242.6 × 229.3 | 34.9 | 0.019 | 0.026 |
166 | 220.4 × 190.8 | 234.5 × 222.6 | 34.9 | 0.018 | 0.024 |
174 | 212.6 × 184.7 | 224.5 × 212.6 | 29.1 | 0.020 | 0.025 |
181 | 202.4 × 177.2 | 214.4 × 203.4 | 29.1 | 0.018 | 0.021 |
189 | 193.4 × 168.6 | 208.1 × 196.4 | 29.1 | 0.020 | 0.021 |
197 | 188.1 × 163.9 | 202.1 × 189.4 | 29.1 | 0.019 | 0.020 |
204 | 182.0 × 157.9 | 197.2 × 184.5 | 25.0 | 0.018 | 0.019 |
212 | 173.4 × 150.9 | 189.2 × 176.6 | 25.0 | 0.017 | 0.019 |
219 | 169.5 × 147.0 | 183.4 × 170.4 | 25.0 | 0.018 | 0.019 |
227 | 164.8 × 142.9 | 178.9 × 165.6 | 25.0 | 0.017 | 0.019 |
The overall radio continuum morphology of the LMC shows a distinct asymmetry, with the eastern side being brighter and compressed. This asymmetry is also visible in the combined single-dish (Parkes) and interferometer (ATCA) H i map (Kim et al. 2003; Staveley-Smith et al. 2003) as shown by the contours in Fig. 3. We note that the compressed side of the LMC is facing the direction of proper motion of the LMC (Kallivayalil et al. 2013; van der Marel & Kallivayalil 2014) and leading the trailing Magellanic Stream. The “arm” structures as seen in the H i map, as well as the 1.4 GHz (Feitzinger et al. 1987) and 4.75 GHz (Haynes et al. 1991) radio continuum maps, are also visible in the MWA images.

Top: H i column density contours (Kim et al. 2003; Staveley-Smith et al. 2003) at 2 × 1021 cm−2 (brown) and 4 × 1021 cm−2 (green) are overlaid on to the 227 MHz GLEAM radio continuum map of the LMC. The H i map is convolved and regridded to match the resolution and pixel scale of the 227 MHz GLEAM image. The grey scale is in units of Jy beam−1. The directions of proper motion and the Magellanic Stream are indicated by arrows. Extended H i and radio continuum emission south of 30 Doradus point toward the Magellanic bridge and the SMC. Bottom: As top, with the addition H i column density contour level at 6 × 1021 cm−2 for the SMC (Stanimirovic et al. 1999). The bar and wing are labelled.
The most notable concentration of radio continuum emission is at the largest H ii region, 30 Doradus, where the H i column density is high enough to fuel star formation. The lesser explored star-forming complex, N79, in the south-west region of the LMC has recently been reported to possess more than twice the star formation efficiency of 30 Doradus (Ochsendorf et al. 2017). Interestingly, for both N11 and N79 which are among the largest star-forming regions in the LMC, the radio continuum is relatively weak in all GLEAM sub-bands. Other patches of strong emission are also consistent with supershell locations, where the shell interaction and expansion could also be triggering star formation.
An asymmetry is also seen in deep optical images of the LMC (Besla et al. 2016), except that the overdensity of the stellar component is located at the opposite side (west) of the radio continuum emission. Since the old stellar population results in this overdensity on the western side of the LMC, detection of radio continuum emission is not expected. The asymmetric feature as shown in both radio and optical has been studied in simulations and concluded to be evidence of tidal interaction between our Milky Way and the MCs and a result of ram-pressure (see Diaz & Bekki 2011; Besla et al. 2016; Mackey et al. 2016).
Fig. 3 (bottom panel) shows the 227 MHz radio continuum image of the SMC overlaid with HI contours (Stanimirovic et al. 1999). The overall morphology of the SMC’s radio continuum emission is similar to H i, its stellar distribution, and with the dominant of bright H ii complexes across the bar. There is visible diffuse emission extending out from the bar region toward the south-east side (SMC wing) and the H ii complexes (N83/84; Bolatto et al. 2003). The further extensions known as the SMC “tail” (Stanimirovic et al. 1999) and Magellanic bridge (Brüns et al. 2005) are quite distinct in H i. A stellar component has been found in the bridge suggesting stripped material due to tidal interaction (Harris 2007) but the young stellar component also suggests ongoing star formation (Chen et al. 2014).
4 ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
4.1 Integrated flux densities
Tables 2–3 summarize our measurements and values obtained from the literature at other frequencies. We note that flux densities at 85.5 and 96.8 MHz in Mills (1959) revised by Klein et al. (1989) are significantly higher than our measurements despite these values have been scaled to match the flux density scale of Baars et al. (1977) and corrected for unrelated foreground and background sources. Despite this discrepancy, we still include 85.5 and 96.8 MHz values in our spectral fitting.
ν (MHz) . | Sν (Jy) . | σ (Jy) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
19.7 | 5270 | 1054 | Shain (1959)a |
45 | 2997 | 450 | Alvarez, Aparici & May (1987) |
85.5 | 3689 | 400 | Mills (1959)a |
96.8 | 2839 | 600 | Mills (1959)a |
158 | 1736 | 490 | Mills (1959)a |
76 | 1855.3 | 315.6 | This study |
84 | 1775.7 | 302.0 | This study |
92 | 1574.9 | 267.9 | This study |
99 | 1451.6 | 247.0 | This study |
107 | 1827.6 | 310.8 | This study |
115 | 1627.5 | 276.8 | This study |
123 | 1643.3 | 279.4 | This study |
130 | 1571.8 | 267.3 | This study |
143 | 1663.7 | 282.9 | This study |
150 | 1450.1 | 246.6 | This study |
158 | 1350.4 | 229.6 | This study |
166 | 1204.3 | 204.8 | This study |
174 | 1341.4 | 228.1 | This study |
181 | 1247.1 | 212.1 | This study |
189 | 1223.9 | 208.1 | This study |
197 | 1109.8 | 188.8 | This study |
204 | 1235.3 | 210.1 | This study |
212 | 1121.6 | 190.8 | This study |
219 | 1032.4 | 175.6 | This study |
227 | 1019.7 | 173.4 | This study |
408 | 925 | 30 | Klein et al. (1989) |
1400 | 384 | 30 | This studyb |
1400 | 529 | 30 | Klein et al. (1989) |
2300 | 412 | 50 | Mountfort et al. (1987) |
2450 | 390 | 20 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
4750 | 363 | 30 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
4750 | 300 | 40 | This studyc |
8550 | 270 | 35 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
ν (MHz) . | Sν (Jy) . | σ (Jy) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
19.7 | 5270 | 1054 | Shain (1959)a |
45 | 2997 | 450 | Alvarez, Aparici & May (1987) |
85.5 | 3689 | 400 | Mills (1959)a |
96.8 | 2839 | 600 | Mills (1959)a |
158 | 1736 | 490 | Mills (1959)a |
76 | 1855.3 | 315.6 | This study |
84 | 1775.7 | 302.0 | This study |
92 | 1574.9 | 267.9 | This study |
99 | 1451.6 | 247.0 | This study |
107 | 1827.6 | 310.8 | This study |
115 | 1627.5 | 276.8 | This study |
123 | 1643.3 | 279.4 | This study |
130 | 1571.8 | 267.3 | This study |
143 | 1663.7 | 282.9 | This study |
150 | 1450.1 | 246.6 | This study |
158 | 1350.4 | 229.6 | This study |
166 | 1204.3 | 204.8 | This study |
174 | 1341.4 | 228.1 | This study |
181 | 1247.1 | 212.1 | This study |
189 | 1223.9 | 208.1 | This study |
197 | 1109.8 | 188.8 | This study |
204 | 1235.3 | 210.1 | This study |
212 | 1121.6 | 190.8 | This study |
219 | 1032.4 | 175.6 | This study |
227 | 1019.7 | 173.4 | This study |
408 | 925 | 30 | Klein et al. (1989) |
1400 | 384 | 30 | This studyb |
1400 | 529 | 30 | Klein et al. (1989) |
2300 | 412 | 50 | Mountfort et al. (1987) |
2450 | 390 | 20 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
4750 | 363 | 30 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
4750 | 300 | 40 | This studyc |
8550 | 270 | 35 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
ν (MHz) . | Sν (Jy) . | σ (Jy) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
19.7 | 5270 | 1054 | Shain (1959)a |
45 | 2997 | 450 | Alvarez, Aparici & May (1987) |
85.5 | 3689 | 400 | Mills (1959)a |
96.8 | 2839 | 600 | Mills (1959)a |
158 | 1736 | 490 | Mills (1959)a |
76 | 1855.3 | 315.6 | This study |
84 | 1775.7 | 302.0 | This study |
92 | 1574.9 | 267.9 | This study |
99 | 1451.6 | 247.0 | This study |
107 | 1827.6 | 310.8 | This study |
115 | 1627.5 | 276.8 | This study |
123 | 1643.3 | 279.4 | This study |
130 | 1571.8 | 267.3 | This study |
143 | 1663.7 | 282.9 | This study |
150 | 1450.1 | 246.6 | This study |
158 | 1350.4 | 229.6 | This study |
166 | 1204.3 | 204.8 | This study |
174 | 1341.4 | 228.1 | This study |
181 | 1247.1 | 212.1 | This study |
189 | 1223.9 | 208.1 | This study |
197 | 1109.8 | 188.8 | This study |
204 | 1235.3 | 210.1 | This study |
212 | 1121.6 | 190.8 | This study |
219 | 1032.4 | 175.6 | This study |
227 | 1019.7 | 173.4 | This study |
408 | 925 | 30 | Klein et al. (1989) |
1400 | 384 | 30 | This studyb |
1400 | 529 | 30 | Klein et al. (1989) |
2300 | 412 | 50 | Mountfort et al. (1987) |
2450 | 390 | 20 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
4750 | 363 | 30 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
4750 | 300 | 40 | This studyc |
8550 | 270 | 35 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
ν (MHz) . | Sν (Jy) . | σ (Jy) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
19.7 | 5270 | 1054 | Shain (1959)a |
45 | 2997 | 450 | Alvarez, Aparici & May (1987) |
85.5 | 3689 | 400 | Mills (1959)a |
96.8 | 2839 | 600 | Mills (1959)a |
158 | 1736 | 490 | Mills (1959)a |
76 | 1855.3 | 315.6 | This study |
84 | 1775.7 | 302.0 | This study |
92 | 1574.9 | 267.9 | This study |
99 | 1451.6 | 247.0 | This study |
107 | 1827.6 | 310.8 | This study |
115 | 1627.5 | 276.8 | This study |
123 | 1643.3 | 279.4 | This study |
130 | 1571.8 | 267.3 | This study |
143 | 1663.7 | 282.9 | This study |
150 | 1450.1 | 246.6 | This study |
158 | 1350.4 | 229.6 | This study |
166 | 1204.3 | 204.8 | This study |
174 | 1341.4 | 228.1 | This study |
181 | 1247.1 | 212.1 | This study |
189 | 1223.9 | 208.1 | This study |
197 | 1109.8 | 188.8 | This study |
204 | 1235.3 | 210.1 | This study |
212 | 1121.6 | 190.8 | This study |
219 | 1032.4 | 175.6 | This study |
227 | 1019.7 | 173.4 | This study |
408 | 925 | 30 | Klein et al. (1989) |
1400 | 384 | 30 | This studyb |
1400 | 529 | 30 | Klein et al. (1989) |
2300 | 412 | 50 | Mountfort et al. (1987) |
2450 | 390 | 20 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
4750 | 363 | 30 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
4750 | 300 | 40 | This studyc |
8550 | 270 | 35 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
ν (MHz) . | Sν (Jy) . | σ (Jy) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
85.5 | 460 | 200 | Mills (1955, 1959)a |
76 | 403.9 | 105.2 | This study |
84 | 291.4 | 76.0 | This study |
92 | 249.8 | 65.3 | This study |
99 | 262.2 | 68.5 | This study |
107 | 354.4 | 92.3 | This study |
115 | 270.5 | 70.5 | This study |
123 | 257.3 | 67.0 | This study |
130 | 244.1 | 63.6 | This study |
143 | 324.6 | 84.5 | This study |
150 | 258.3 | 67.3 | This study |
158 | 264.1 | 68.8 | This study |
166 | 217.1 | 56.6 | This study |
174 | 356.6 | 92.8 | This study |
181 | 282.8 | 73.6 | This study |
189 | 250.4 | 65.2 | This study |
197 | 246.8 | 64.3 | This study |
204 | 291.4 | 75.9 | This study |
212 | 230.7 | 60.1 | This study |
219 | 219.5 | 57.2 | This study |
227 | 215.2 | 56.1 | This study |
408 | 133 | 10 | Loiseau et al. (1987) |
1400 | 42 | 6 | Loiseau et al. (1987)b |
1400 | 34.7 | 2.0 | This studyc |
2300 | 31 | 6 | Mountfort et al. (1987) |
2300 | 27.1 | 7.0 | This studyd |
2450 | 26 | 3 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
4750 | 19 | 4 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
8550 | 15 | 4 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
ν (MHz) . | Sν (Jy) . | σ (Jy) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
85.5 | 460 | 200 | Mills (1955, 1959)a |
76 | 403.9 | 105.2 | This study |
84 | 291.4 | 76.0 | This study |
92 | 249.8 | 65.3 | This study |
99 | 262.2 | 68.5 | This study |
107 | 354.4 | 92.3 | This study |
115 | 270.5 | 70.5 | This study |
123 | 257.3 | 67.0 | This study |
130 | 244.1 | 63.6 | This study |
143 | 324.6 | 84.5 | This study |
150 | 258.3 | 67.3 | This study |
158 | 264.1 | 68.8 | This study |
166 | 217.1 | 56.6 | This study |
174 | 356.6 | 92.8 | This study |
181 | 282.8 | 73.6 | This study |
189 | 250.4 | 65.2 | This study |
197 | 246.8 | 64.3 | This study |
204 | 291.4 | 75.9 | This study |
212 | 230.7 | 60.1 | This study |
219 | 219.5 | 57.2 | This study |
227 | 215.2 | 56.1 | This study |
408 | 133 | 10 | Loiseau et al. (1987) |
1400 | 42 | 6 | Loiseau et al. (1987)b |
1400 | 34.7 | 2.0 | This studyc |
2300 | 31 | 6 | Mountfort et al. (1987) |
2300 | 27.1 | 7.0 | This studyd |
2450 | 26 | 3 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
4750 | 19 | 4 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
8550 | 15 | 4 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
ν (MHz) . | Sν (Jy) . | σ (Jy) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
85.5 | 460 | 200 | Mills (1955, 1959)a |
76 | 403.9 | 105.2 | This study |
84 | 291.4 | 76.0 | This study |
92 | 249.8 | 65.3 | This study |
99 | 262.2 | 68.5 | This study |
107 | 354.4 | 92.3 | This study |
115 | 270.5 | 70.5 | This study |
123 | 257.3 | 67.0 | This study |
130 | 244.1 | 63.6 | This study |
143 | 324.6 | 84.5 | This study |
150 | 258.3 | 67.3 | This study |
158 | 264.1 | 68.8 | This study |
166 | 217.1 | 56.6 | This study |
174 | 356.6 | 92.8 | This study |
181 | 282.8 | 73.6 | This study |
189 | 250.4 | 65.2 | This study |
197 | 246.8 | 64.3 | This study |
204 | 291.4 | 75.9 | This study |
212 | 230.7 | 60.1 | This study |
219 | 219.5 | 57.2 | This study |
227 | 215.2 | 56.1 | This study |
408 | 133 | 10 | Loiseau et al. (1987) |
1400 | 42 | 6 | Loiseau et al. (1987)b |
1400 | 34.7 | 2.0 | This studyc |
2300 | 31 | 6 | Mountfort et al. (1987) |
2300 | 27.1 | 7.0 | This studyd |
2450 | 26 | 3 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
4750 | 19 | 4 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
8550 | 15 | 4 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
ν (MHz) . | Sν (Jy) . | σ (Jy) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
85.5 | 460 | 200 | Mills (1955, 1959)a |
76 | 403.9 | 105.2 | This study |
84 | 291.4 | 76.0 | This study |
92 | 249.8 | 65.3 | This study |
99 | 262.2 | 68.5 | This study |
107 | 354.4 | 92.3 | This study |
115 | 270.5 | 70.5 | This study |
123 | 257.3 | 67.0 | This study |
130 | 244.1 | 63.6 | This study |
143 | 324.6 | 84.5 | This study |
150 | 258.3 | 67.3 | This study |
158 | 264.1 | 68.8 | This study |
166 | 217.1 | 56.6 | This study |
174 | 356.6 | 92.8 | This study |
181 | 282.8 | 73.6 | This study |
189 | 250.4 | 65.2 | This study |
197 | 246.8 | 64.3 | This study |
204 | 291.4 | 75.9 | This study |
212 | 230.7 | 60.1 | This study |
219 | 219.5 | 57.2 | This study |
227 | 215.2 | 56.1 | This study |
408 | 133 | 10 | Loiseau et al. (1987) |
1400 | 42 | 6 | Loiseau et al. (1987)b |
1400 | 34.7 | 2.0 | This studyc |
2300 | 31 | 6 | Mountfort et al. (1987) |
2300 | 27.1 | 7.0 | This studyd |
2450 | 26 | 3 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
4750 | 19 | 4 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
8550 | 15 | 4 | Haynes et al. (1991) |
The LMC is located in a region of sky in which the Galactic foreground emission is negligible at MHz and GHz frequencies. However, extended Galactic foreground emission is known to be present at the location of the SMC (see discussion in Haynes et al. 1991 and references therein). Examining the SMC region in the 408 MHz all-sky survey of (Haslam et al. 1981), we find that the strongest Galactic foreground emission is located beyond the 6°× 6° region that we use in this study. Measurements of Haynes et al. (1991) have taken into account for the extended Galactic foreground emission because of the larger imaging area than ours. Their studies were conducted using a single-dish telescope. With the use of interferometer data from the MWA, it is possible to resolve out flux from large-scale structure. Based on the shortest baseline of phase I MWA (7.7 m), the largest angular scales for 76 MHz and 227 MHz are 29° and 10°, respectively. Since these angular scales are larger than our studied regions, we do not expect our measurements to be affected by missing flux in the GLEAM images.
4.2 SED modelling
4.2.1 Model selection
Based on the ΔBIC values, we find the preferred model to be the double power law with fixed α1 = −0.1 (model 3) for the LMC. This model yields α0 = −0.66 ± 0.08 (non-thermal). This suggests that synchrotron radiation dominates at lower frequencies and thermal free–free emission takes over at higher frequencies. For the SMC, ΔBIC values of model 2–4 are negative which implies the power law (model 1) is the preferred model. A summary of the SED fitting results and associated statistical values is given in Table 4. Fig. 4 shows the best fitting models for the LMC and SMC, respectively.

Spectral energy distribution of the Large (top) and Small (bottom) Magellanic Cloud. Orange circles, red triangles, and blue squares represent MWA, values from the literature and re-derived measurements in this study, respectively (refer to Tables 2–3). Top: A double power-law model, with α0 = −0.66 ± 0.08 and α1 = −0.1, is fitted to the LMC spectrum as shown by black dashed line. Bottom: A power law with α = −0.82 ± 0.03 is fitted to the SMC spectrum.
A summary of the fits to the SED of the MCs using four different models discussed in the text. The reference frequency is 0.2 GHz.
. | LMC . | SMC . |
---|---|---|
Power law | ||
Model 1 | ||
χ2 | 61.5 | 32.3 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 2.0 | 1.2 |
BIC | 466.6 | 297.9 |
dof | 31 | 27 |
S0 | 1258.2 ± 43.0 Jy | 192.2 ± 9.6 Jy |
α | −0.47 ± 0.02 | −0.82 ± 0.03 |
Curved power law | ||
Model 2 | ||
χ2 | 55.3 | 29.3 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 1.8 | 1.1 |
BIC | 464.0 | 298.3 |
ΔBIC | 2.6 | −0.4 |
dof | 30 | 26 |
S0 | 1265.5 ± 41.6 Jy | 191.3 ± 9.2 Jy |
α | −0.49 ± 0.02 | −0.85 ± 0.03 |
c | 0.73 ± 0.10 | 0.33 ± 0.09 |
Double power law, fixed α1 = −0.1 | ||
Model 3 | ||
χ2 | 52.1 | 31.8 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 1.7 | 1.2 |
BIC | 460.8 | 300.8 |
ΔBIC | 5.8 | −2.9 |
dof | 30 | 26 |
S0 | 982.6 ± 97.5 Jy | 186.4 ± 13.7 Jy |
α0 | −0.66 ± 0.08 | −0.86 ± 0.08 |
S1 | 265.8 ± 77.5 | 4.6 ± 7.8 |
Double power law | ||
Model 4 | ||
χ2 | 51.2 | 28.8 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 1.8 | 1.2 |
BIC | 463.3 | 301.2 |
ΔBIC | 3.3 | −3.3 |
dof | 29 | 25 |
S0 | 1234.0 ± 114.4 Jy | 193.0 ± 9.4 Jy |
α0 | −0.55 ± 0.09 | −0.83 ± 0.05 |
S1 | 28.6 ± 91.9 Jy | 0.02 ± 0.20 Jy |
α1 | 0.41 ± 0.78 | 1.56 ± 2.65 |
. | LMC . | SMC . |
---|---|---|
Power law | ||
Model 1 | ||
χ2 | 61.5 | 32.3 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 2.0 | 1.2 |
BIC | 466.6 | 297.9 |
dof | 31 | 27 |
S0 | 1258.2 ± 43.0 Jy | 192.2 ± 9.6 Jy |
α | −0.47 ± 0.02 | −0.82 ± 0.03 |
Curved power law | ||
Model 2 | ||
χ2 | 55.3 | 29.3 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 1.8 | 1.1 |
BIC | 464.0 | 298.3 |
ΔBIC | 2.6 | −0.4 |
dof | 30 | 26 |
S0 | 1265.5 ± 41.6 Jy | 191.3 ± 9.2 Jy |
α | −0.49 ± 0.02 | −0.85 ± 0.03 |
c | 0.73 ± 0.10 | 0.33 ± 0.09 |
Double power law, fixed α1 = −0.1 | ||
Model 3 | ||
χ2 | 52.1 | 31.8 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 1.7 | 1.2 |
BIC | 460.8 | 300.8 |
ΔBIC | 5.8 | −2.9 |
dof | 30 | 26 |
S0 | 982.6 ± 97.5 Jy | 186.4 ± 13.7 Jy |
α0 | −0.66 ± 0.08 | −0.86 ± 0.08 |
S1 | 265.8 ± 77.5 | 4.6 ± 7.8 |
Double power law | ||
Model 4 | ||
χ2 | 51.2 | 28.8 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 1.8 | 1.2 |
BIC | 463.3 | 301.2 |
ΔBIC | 3.3 | −3.3 |
dof | 29 | 25 |
S0 | 1234.0 ± 114.4 Jy | 193.0 ± 9.4 Jy |
α0 | −0.55 ± 0.09 | −0.83 ± 0.05 |
S1 | 28.6 ± 91.9 Jy | 0.02 ± 0.20 Jy |
α1 | 0.41 ± 0.78 | 1.56 ± 2.65 |
A summary of the fits to the SED of the MCs using four different models discussed in the text. The reference frequency is 0.2 GHz.
. | LMC . | SMC . |
---|---|---|
Power law | ||
Model 1 | ||
χ2 | 61.5 | 32.3 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 2.0 | 1.2 |
BIC | 466.6 | 297.9 |
dof | 31 | 27 |
S0 | 1258.2 ± 43.0 Jy | 192.2 ± 9.6 Jy |
α | −0.47 ± 0.02 | −0.82 ± 0.03 |
Curved power law | ||
Model 2 | ||
χ2 | 55.3 | 29.3 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 1.8 | 1.1 |
BIC | 464.0 | 298.3 |
ΔBIC | 2.6 | −0.4 |
dof | 30 | 26 |
S0 | 1265.5 ± 41.6 Jy | 191.3 ± 9.2 Jy |
α | −0.49 ± 0.02 | −0.85 ± 0.03 |
c | 0.73 ± 0.10 | 0.33 ± 0.09 |
Double power law, fixed α1 = −0.1 | ||
Model 3 | ||
χ2 | 52.1 | 31.8 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 1.7 | 1.2 |
BIC | 460.8 | 300.8 |
ΔBIC | 5.8 | −2.9 |
dof | 30 | 26 |
S0 | 982.6 ± 97.5 Jy | 186.4 ± 13.7 Jy |
α0 | −0.66 ± 0.08 | −0.86 ± 0.08 |
S1 | 265.8 ± 77.5 | 4.6 ± 7.8 |
Double power law | ||
Model 4 | ||
χ2 | 51.2 | 28.8 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 1.8 | 1.2 |
BIC | 463.3 | 301.2 |
ΔBIC | 3.3 | −3.3 |
dof | 29 | 25 |
S0 | 1234.0 ± 114.4 Jy | 193.0 ± 9.4 Jy |
α0 | −0.55 ± 0.09 | −0.83 ± 0.05 |
S1 | 28.6 ± 91.9 Jy | 0.02 ± 0.20 Jy |
α1 | 0.41 ± 0.78 | 1.56 ± 2.65 |
. | LMC . | SMC . |
---|---|---|
Power law | ||
Model 1 | ||
χ2 | 61.5 | 32.3 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 2.0 | 1.2 |
BIC | 466.6 | 297.9 |
dof | 31 | 27 |
S0 | 1258.2 ± 43.0 Jy | 192.2 ± 9.6 Jy |
α | −0.47 ± 0.02 | −0.82 ± 0.03 |
Curved power law | ||
Model 2 | ||
χ2 | 55.3 | 29.3 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 1.8 | 1.1 |
BIC | 464.0 | 298.3 |
ΔBIC | 2.6 | −0.4 |
dof | 30 | 26 |
S0 | 1265.5 ± 41.6 Jy | 191.3 ± 9.2 Jy |
α | −0.49 ± 0.02 | −0.85 ± 0.03 |
c | 0.73 ± 0.10 | 0.33 ± 0.09 |
Double power law, fixed α1 = −0.1 | ||
Model 3 | ||
χ2 | 52.1 | 31.8 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 1.7 | 1.2 |
BIC | 460.8 | 300.8 |
ΔBIC | 5.8 | −2.9 |
dof | 30 | 26 |
S0 | 982.6 ± 97.5 Jy | 186.4 ± 13.7 Jy |
α0 | −0.66 ± 0.08 | −0.86 ± 0.08 |
S1 | 265.8 ± 77.5 | 4.6 ± 7.8 |
Double power law | ||
Model 4 | ||
χ2 | 51.2 | 28.8 |
|$\chi _{\rm red}^{2}$| | 1.8 | 1.2 |
BIC | 463.3 | 301.2 |
ΔBIC | 3.3 | −3.3 |
dof | 29 | 25 |
S0 | 1234.0 ± 114.4 Jy | 193.0 ± 9.4 Jy |
α0 | −0.55 ± 0.09 | −0.83 ± 0.05 |
S1 | 28.6 ± 91.9 Jy | 0.02 ± 0.20 Jy |
α1 | 0.41 ± 0.78 | 1.56 ± 2.65 |
4.2.2 Comparison with previous studies
The derived non-thermal spectral index (α0 = −0.66 ± 0.08) between 19.7 MHz and 408 MHz, for the LMC is consistent with Klein et al. (1989), |$\alpha _{\rm 2.3\ GHz}^{\rm 19.7\ MHz}$| =−0.70 ± 0.06. For the SMC, we derive |$\alpha _{\rm 8.55\ GHz}^{\rm 85.5\ MHz} = -0.82\pm 0.03$|, which is also consistent with the literature value of |$\alpha _{\rm 8.55\ GHz}^{\rm 85.5\ MHz}$| =−0.85 ± 0.05 (Haynes et al. 1991). Comparing our derived spectral index of the SMC to the mean spectral index derived from all sources in the SMC (αSMC = −0.73 ± 0.05; Filipovic et al. 1998), we do not find significant differences.
4.3 Intensity variation across the MCs
In Section 3, we show that the LMC exhibits an asymmetric morphology in the radio continuum map. We examine the intensity variation across the LMC in 10 MWA frequency bands (see Fig. 5). By dissecting the disc of the LMC through the 30 Doradus region, we find that there are a few peaks associated with the H ii regions and supernova remnants. The diffuse emission exhibits constant intensity on the eastern side. A gradual decline in intensity from right ascension ∼5h16m48s onward to the western end is noticeable. In the north–south direction, the intensity of diffuse emission declines when moving away from the 30 Doradus region. A steeper decline of intensity south of 30 Doradus is seen as compared to the northern part. Compared with the 1.4 GHz radio continuum intensity profiles as shown in fig. 7 of Hughes et al. (2007), the north–south intensity profile is quite similar. We examined the intensity profiles across the bar and north–south direction of the SMC (not shown here), which show that there is no variation apart from a few intensity peaks contributed by the H ii regions.

Intensity profiles of the LMC in a logarithmic scale. Top: 166 MHz image over 10°× 10°. The red lines represent the slice axes in an interval of 0.02° across 30 Doradus for the intensity profiles. The grey scale is in units of Jy beam−1. Middle: Intensity profile in east-west direction. Bottom: Same as top except for south–north direction.
4.4 Contribution from background radio sources
The areas we use for measuring the total flux densities of the MCs include background radio sources. The contribution from the background radio sources can be estimated using a median filtering method. This method has been shown to be successful in eliminating most of the background point sources in the 1.4 GHz radio continuum image (Hughes et al. 2007). Sources intrinsic to the MCs, such as the H ii regions, are more compact and not point like. Thus, median filtering will not eliminate them. We perform the median filtering of GLEAM images using the FMEDIAN task in the ftools package1 (Blackburn 1995). The task convolves an image with a median value within a defined box. Various smoothing window parameters have been tested and we find that the optimal smoothing window for median filtering most of the background sources is 17 × 17 pixels in size. Subsequently, the median-filtered maps are compared to their corresponding non-filtered maps. The results suggested a |${\sim }10{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| of flux contribution from background sources at the lowest frequency band of GLEAM and |${\sim }20{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| at the highest frequency band. We note that the difference in background sources contribution between lowest and highest GLEAM frequency band is probably due to resolution effect given that the spectral index of background sources is independent of frequency. Since this filtering method does not distinguish background point sources and point sources intrinsic to the MCs (Hughes et al. 2007), we do not subtract the contribution when measuring the total integrated flux densities.
4.5 Radio spectral index maps
The spectral index maps allow us to separate the thermal and non-thermal emission of the MCs. We use all GLEAM images but only present the spectral index maps from the GLEAM 166 MHz and the 1.4 GHz images. The GLEAM 166 MHz image is chosen because of its intermediate sensitivity and resolution that emphasizes both diffuse emission and discrete sources.

Spectral index map of the LMC calculated from the GLEAM 166 MHz and the 1.4 GHz images. Panels (a) and (b) on the right show H ii regions: 30 Doradus and N11. Both have positive α indicating the emission is dominated by thermal emission. At the right corner of panel (a) also shows a prominent source, the supernova remnant 1987A, which has a steep negative α indicating the emission is dominated by non-thermal synchrotron emission. Panel (c) shows supernova remnant N132D. It has a similar α as the supernova remnant 1987A.
In the top panels of Fig. 7, we compare the radio spectral index maps with the Hα images (shown in contours) from the Southern H-Alpha Sky Survey Atlas (SHASSA; Gaustad et al. 2001). The Hα images are in units of deciRayleighs (dR), where 1 R = 106 photons per 4π steradian = 2.42 × 10−7 ergs cm−2 s−1 sr−1. They have a resolution of 0.8 arcmin and are convolved and regridded to match the resolution and pixel scale of the radio spectral index maps. Comparison shows a strong correlation between radio spectral index and Hα emission in giant H ii regions and star-forming complexes, which potentially also emit non-thermal emission. In Fig. 8, we show a pixel–pixel plot of Hα emission versus spectral index focused on a 6 arcmin × 6 arcmin region around the N66 H ii complex in the SMC. The calculated Pearson’s correlation coefficient is 0.89. Overlaying the 166 MHz intensity contours on to the Hα images shows the boundary of the diffuse emission at low frequency. There is a lack of diffuse emission in the south-west region of the LMC and the diffuse emission is slightly more extended than the Hα emission (bottom panels of Fig. 7).

An example of the relationship between Hα emission and spectral index in an H ii region (N66) in the SMC.

Top panels: Contours of Hα at 2500 dR (black) and 10000 dR (green) overlaid on to the spectral index maps. Bottom panels: Intensity contours of 166 MHz continuum map at 0.1 Jy beam−1 (white) and 0.4 Jy beam−1 (green) overlaid on to the SHASSA Hα image.
5 STAR FORMATION IN THE MAGELLANIC CLOUDS
There are many star formation rate (SFR) indicators, ranging from ultraviolet, optical, infrared to radio wavelength (e.g. Kennicutt 1998; Bell 2003; Wu et al. 2005). Ultraviolet stellar continuum and optical recombination lines (Hα) have been widely used in the past but are both affected by dust attenuation. Efforts to find a better star formation indicator to circumvent the dust attenuation problem have turned to infrared (IR) and radio (e.g. Bell 2003; Calzetti et al. 2007). However, it is cautioned that using IR alone can present issues, such as heating of dust by hot evolved stars, which radiate at IR wavelength (e.g. Kennicutt 1998), and large uncertainties in extrapolation of IR luminosity in intermediate or high-redshift studies (e.g. Chapman et al. 2005). The calibration of SFR using far-IR and radio wavelengths has focused on higher frequency (>1.4 GHz) radio continuum emission. With recent radio continuum studies using low-frequency telescopes, such as LOFAR (Low-Frequency Array; van Haarlem et al. 2013) and MWA, a new spectral window has been opened to investigate SFR using far-IR to radio continuum emission correlation down to 150 MHz (Brown et al. 2017; Calistro Rivera et al. 2017). A comprehensive study to calibrate SFR indicators at different wavelengths on an homogeneous scale has been carried out by Brown et al. (2017), hereafter B17. This study uses the 150 MHz flux densities of sources from the GLEAM catalogue (Hurley-Walker et al. 2017) to calibrate the SFR at low redshift. The LOFAR study provides SFR calibration of 150 MHz in a higher redshift regime (Calistro Rivera et al. 2017).
We employ the 150 MHz–Hα relation in table 4 of B17 to calculate the global SFRs for the LMC and SMC. We find that the resulting SFRs depend on the adopted initial mass function (IMF). Conversions between SFR and the 150 MHz–Hα relation based on the IMF of Salpeter (1955), Kroupa (2001), Chabrier (2003) and Baldry & Glazebrook (2003) are given in B17. For comparison with the literature values, we calculate the global SFRs for the LMC and SMC using above IMFs. This yield 0.106 M⊙ yr−1 (LMC) and 0.033 M⊙ yr−1 (SMC) for the Salpeter IMF, 0.074 M⊙ yr−1 (LMC) and 0.022 M⊙ yr−1 (SMC) for the Kroupa IMF, 0.161 M⊙ yr−1 (LMC) and 0.050 M⊙ yr−1 (SMC) for the Chabrier IMF, 0.068 M⊙ yr−1 (LMC) and 0.021 M⊙ yr−1 (SMC) for the Baldry & Glazebrook IMF. The global SFR for the LMC is about a factor of 2 less than the SFR (∼0.2 M⊙ yr−1) quoted in Hughes et al. (2007), where the Salpeter IMF was used. It is also lower by about a factor of 1.5 as compared to 0.037 M⊙ yr−1 in Bolatto et al. (2011), where Kroupa IMF was adopted. The values calculated using Chabrier IMF are more consistent with the literature values that are based on the 1.4 GHz calibration. The SFR is known to be underestimated at low frequencies (see e.g. Calistro Rivera et al. 2017).
6 H ii REGIONS
Lower limit of Lyman continuum photon production rates of selected H ii regions in the LMC with α > 0 (see section 6.1).
Source . | MCELS ID . | R.A. (J2000) (h:m:s) . | Decl. (J2000) (° arcmin arcsec) . | NUV (s . | α . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H ii 1 | L102 | 05:05:06.7 | −70:06:24.1 | 7.70 × 1050 | – |
H ii 2 | L106 | 05:06:05.0 | −65:41:28.7 | 1.46 × 1051 | – |
H ii 3 | L119 | 05:09:34.3 | −68:53:44.9 | 1.40 × 1051 | 0.05 ± 0.03 |
H ii 4 | L134 | 05:12:28.4 | −70:24:52.2 | 2.51 × 1051 | – |
H ii 5 | L201 | 05:22:06.9 | −67:56:46.0 | 3.74 × 1051 | 0.04 ± 0.03 |
H ii 6 | L258 | 05:26:42.5 | −68:49:34.0 | 2.52 × 1051 | 0.12 ± 0.04 |
H ii 7 | L260 | 05:27:17.6 | −70:34:46.2 | 8.74 × 1050 | – |
H ii 8 | L307 | 05:35:15.6 | −67:34:04.1 | 1.88 × 1051 | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
H ii 9 | L328 | 05:38:36.0 | −69:05:10.7 | 1.06 × 1052 | – |
H ii 10 | L343 | 05:40:06.8 | −69:45:28.4 | 2.64 × 1051 | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
Source . | MCELS ID . | R.A. (J2000) (h:m:s) . | Decl. (J2000) (° arcmin arcsec) . | NUV (s . | α . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H ii 1 | L102 | 05:05:06.7 | −70:06:24.1 | 7.70 × 1050 | – |
H ii 2 | L106 | 05:06:05.0 | −65:41:28.7 | 1.46 × 1051 | – |
H ii 3 | L119 | 05:09:34.3 | −68:53:44.9 | 1.40 × 1051 | 0.05 ± 0.03 |
H ii 4 | L134 | 05:12:28.4 | −70:24:52.2 | 2.51 × 1051 | – |
H ii 5 | L201 | 05:22:06.9 | −67:56:46.0 | 3.74 × 1051 | 0.04 ± 0.03 |
H ii 6 | L258 | 05:26:42.5 | −68:49:34.0 | 2.52 × 1051 | 0.12 ± 0.04 |
H ii 7 | L260 | 05:27:17.6 | −70:34:46.2 | 8.74 × 1050 | – |
H ii 8 | L307 | 05:35:15.6 | −67:34:04.1 | 1.88 × 1051 | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
H ii 9 | L328 | 05:38:36.0 | −69:05:10.7 | 1.06 × 1052 | – |
H ii 10 | L343 | 05:40:06.8 | −69:45:28.4 | 2.64 × 1051 | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
Lower limit of Lyman continuum photon production rates of selected H ii regions in the LMC with α > 0 (see section 6.1).
Source . | MCELS ID . | R.A. (J2000) (h:m:s) . | Decl. (J2000) (° arcmin arcsec) . | NUV (s . | α . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H ii 1 | L102 | 05:05:06.7 | −70:06:24.1 | 7.70 × 1050 | – |
H ii 2 | L106 | 05:06:05.0 | −65:41:28.7 | 1.46 × 1051 | – |
H ii 3 | L119 | 05:09:34.3 | −68:53:44.9 | 1.40 × 1051 | 0.05 ± 0.03 |
H ii 4 | L134 | 05:12:28.4 | −70:24:52.2 | 2.51 × 1051 | – |
H ii 5 | L201 | 05:22:06.9 | −67:56:46.0 | 3.74 × 1051 | 0.04 ± 0.03 |
H ii 6 | L258 | 05:26:42.5 | −68:49:34.0 | 2.52 × 1051 | 0.12 ± 0.04 |
H ii 7 | L260 | 05:27:17.6 | −70:34:46.2 | 8.74 × 1050 | – |
H ii 8 | L307 | 05:35:15.6 | −67:34:04.1 | 1.88 × 1051 | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
H ii 9 | L328 | 05:38:36.0 | −69:05:10.7 | 1.06 × 1052 | – |
H ii 10 | L343 | 05:40:06.8 | −69:45:28.4 | 2.64 × 1051 | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
Source . | MCELS ID . | R.A. (J2000) (h:m:s) . | Decl. (J2000) (° arcmin arcsec) . | NUV (s . | α . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H ii 1 | L102 | 05:05:06.7 | −70:06:24.1 | 7.70 × 1050 | – |
H ii 2 | L106 | 05:06:05.0 | −65:41:28.7 | 1.46 × 1051 | – |
H ii 3 | L119 | 05:09:34.3 | −68:53:44.9 | 1.40 × 1051 | 0.05 ± 0.03 |
H ii 4 | L134 | 05:12:28.4 | −70:24:52.2 | 2.51 × 1051 | – |
H ii 5 | L201 | 05:22:06.9 | −67:56:46.0 | 3.74 × 1051 | 0.04 ± 0.03 |
H ii 6 | L258 | 05:26:42.5 | −68:49:34.0 | 2.52 × 1051 | 0.12 ± 0.04 |
H ii 7 | L260 | 05:27:17.6 | −70:34:46.2 | 8.74 × 1050 | – |
H ii 8 | L307 | 05:35:15.6 | −67:34:04.1 | 1.88 × 1051 | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
H ii 9 | L328 | 05:38:36.0 | −69:05:10.7 | 1.06 × 1052 | – |
H ii 10 | L343 | 05:40:06.8 | −69:45:28.4 | 2.64 × 1051 | 0.09 ± 0.03 |
Studying γ-ray emission in the MCs allows us to probe the physical processes of cosmic rays (CRs) interaction with the interstellar medium (Ackermann et al. 2016). Discrete sources, in particularly the star-forming regions, are claimed to be possible sites for producing large amount of CR-induced γ-ray emission. While we are not focusing on this topic in this paper, we can estimate the CR confinement within the LMC and SMC by comparing the contribution from discrete sources to the total Sν. The total integrated flux density of 10 H ii regions listed above is ∼138 Jy at 150 MHz, which includes the largest H ii region (30 Doradus). Based on the LMC discrete sources listed in Filipovic et al. (2003), we measure their Sν and yields a total Sν of ∼163 Jy. As for the SMC, we focus on the H ii regions in Pellegrini et al. (2012) and SNRs in Bozzetto et al. (2017). The total Sν from the SMC discrete sources is ∼59 Jy. These yield ∼21 per cent and ∼23 per cent of the emission attributed to individual sources at 150 MHz for the LMC and SMC, respectively.
6.1 T–T plot
To investigate a possible spatial variation of the spectral index across the resolved H ii regions in both 227 MHz and 1.4 GHz images, we use the T–T method (Turtle et al. 1962). This method compares flux density (or brightness temperature) at two frequencies from different instruments and allows for possible foreground contamination as well as variations due to short spacings. If there is any difference in short spacings or contamination from foreground emission, it will result in a non-zero intercept in the T–T plot. We generate the T–T plot by convolving and regridding the LMC 1.4 GHz image to match the angular resolution and pixel scale of the 227 MHz GLEAM image. The 227 MHz GLEAM image is chosen because it has the highest angular resolution. Subsequently, we subsample the data points per 5 pixel (∼1.3 beam separation) in the image plane to remove pixel-to-pixel correlations. Then, we fit the subsampled data using linear least squares regression. The spectral index is then determined by α = log (slope)/c, where c is log (227 MHz/1400 MHz). We present the T–T plots in Fig. 9 and summarize the derived spectral indices in Table 5. All fits yield an overall R2 = 0.93, which suggests no spatial variation of the spectral index across these H ii regions. We cannot derive spectral indices for five of the H ii regions using the T–T method because the sources are resolved at 1.4 GHz (multiple components) but not resolved in 227 MHz or affected by artefacts at 1.4 GHz (near the 30 Doradus region). The derived spectral indices of these H ii regions ranges from ∼0.0 to ∼0.1, which suggests a “flat” spectrum dominated by thermal emission. These H ii regions are in the optically thin regime in the MWA frequency range. We also attempted to derive the spectral index and to identify the turn-over frequency using the optically thick H ii regions defined in the catalogue of Pellegrini et al. (2012). However, we do not see any convincing evidence of a turn over frequency due to difficulty in measuring accurate flux densities in the lower MWA frequency bands as a result of poor resolution.

T–T plots for the five optically thin H ii regions in the LMC using 1.4 GHz and 227 MHz images. The 1.4 GHz cutout images have been convolved and regridded to match the resolution and pixel scale of the 227 MHz images. The data points have been subsampled every 5 pixel in the image plane. The fitted lines are the spectral indices of these regions. Error of S1400 is ∼0.3 mJy beam−1, which makes the error bars too small to be visible in these plots.
7 CONCLUSIONS
We present a low-frequency radio continuum study of the Magellanic Clouds as part of the GLEAM survey. The intensity of the radio continuum emission is correlated with H i column density. Star-forming regions are the main contributors to the emission. Intensity variation is noticeable in the LMC but flat across the bar of the SMC. We derive spectral indices of the MCs using 200 MHz as a reference frequency. A double power-law model is required to fit the SED of the LMC. The fitted model yields α0 = −0.66 ± 0.08 (non-thermal) when α1 (thermal) is fixed at −0.1. A power-law model is preferred for the SMC, which yields |$\alpha _{\rm 8.55 GHz}^{\rm 85.5 MHz}$| (SMC) =−0.82 ± 0.03. Spectral index maps show a variation of α across the Magellanic Clouds, which reflects the presence of thermal and non-thermal components. H ii regions have a distinctive flat spectral index and strongly correlate with Hα, indicating mainly thermal emission. We also calculate the lower limit production rate of Lyman continuum photons of ten H ii regions in the LMC using their integrated flux density at 150 MHz. An investigation of spectral index variation among the H ii regions is carried out using the T–T method. The derived spectral indices for these H ii regions are between about 0 and 0.1. The new Hα–150 MHz SFR calibrations (Brown et al. 2017) allow us to determine the global SFRs of the MCs. Using their calibrations based on Salpeter, Kroupa, Chabrier and Baldry |$\&$| Glazebrook’s IMFs, we obtain the global SFRs of 0.068–0.161 M⊙ yr−1 and 0.021–0.050 M⊙ yr−1 for the LMC and SMC, respectively. We find that the global SFRs are consistent with the 1.4 GHz SFR calibration if Charbrier’s IMF is adopted. Robust -1 images in 20 frequency bands and wideband averages are made available at the GLEAM Virtual Observatory (VO) server.2
8 FUTURE WORK
A detailed study of discrete sources such as H ii regions, supernova remnants, and background sources in the GLEAM images will be presented in a subsequent paper. An analysis of the radio-FIR correlation has been performed in the past for the MCs (Hughes et al. 2006; Leverenz & Filipović 2013). These studies focused on 1.4 GHz and Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) images. Future work includes an investigation of the radio-FIR correlation on different spatial scales using MWA and Herschel images (as part of the HERschel Inventory of The Agents of Galaxy Evolution survey; HERITAGE; Meixner et al. 2013). A deep survey of the Magellanic System (MAGE-X; led by L. Staveley-Smith) using the MWA phase II system has been commenced. The survey will focus on quantifying the energy spectrum of cosmic ray electrons at higher angular resolution.
Footnotes
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This scientific work makes use of the Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory, operated by CSIRO. We acknowledge the Wajarri Yamatji people as the traditional owners of the Observatory site. Support for the operation of the Murchison Widefield Array is provided by the Australian Government (NCRIS), under a contract to Curtin University administered by Astronomy Australia Limited. We acknowledge the Pawsey Supercomputing Centre which is supported by the Western Australian and Australian Governments and the Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO), which is an Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence, funded by grant CE110001020. Parts of this research were conducted with the support of Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D), through project number CE170100013. This research also made use of Montage. Montage is funded by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number ACI-1440620, and was previously funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Earth Science Technology Office, Computation Technologies Project, under Cooperative Agreement Number NCC5-626 between NASA and the California Institute of Technology.