ABSTRACT

Peter Pan discs are a recently discovered class of long-lived discs around low-mass stars that survive for an order of magnitude longer than typical discs. In this paper, we use disc evolutionary models to determine the required balance between initial conditions and the magnitude of dispersal processes for Peter Pan discs to be primordial. We find that we require low transport (α ∼ 10−4), extremely low external photoevaporation (⁠|${\le}10^{-9}\, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, {\rm yr^{-1}}$|⁠), and relatively high disc masses (>0.25M*) to produce discs with ages and accretion rates consistent with Peter Pan discs. Higher transport (α = 10−3) results in disc lifetimes that are too short and even lower transport (α = 10−5) leads to accretion rates smaller than those observed. The required external photoevaporation rates are so low that primordial Peter Pan discs will have formed in rare environments on the periphery of low-mass star-forming regions, or deeply embedded, and as such have never subsequently been exposed to higher amounts of UV radiation. Given that such an external photoevaporation scenario is rare, the required disc parameters and accretion properties may reflect the initial conditions and accretion rates of a much larger fraction of the discs around low-mass stars.

1 INTRODUCTION

With the discovery of over 4000 very diverse exoplanets (e.g. Winn & Fabrycky 2015), understanding the formation of planets from circumstellar discs of material is one of the key problems in astrophysics. Huge advances have been made in recent years, with direct probes of the mid-plane structure of discs (e.g. ALMA Partnership 2015; Andrews et al. 2018) and more statistical assessments of the properties of discs in different stellar clusters (e.g. Ansdell et al. 2017; Eisner et al. 2018). A well-established result from the latter class of study is the typical lifetime of discs, which is derived by inferring the fraction of stars with circumstellar discs in clusters of different ages (e.g. Mamajek 2009; Ribas et al. 2014). This shows that the typical lifetime is |${\lt}3\,$| Myr and that essentially all discs are dispersed by 10  Myr. It has also been shown that these lifetimes are a function of the stellar mass, with discs around lower mass living longer (Carpenter et al. 2006). However, nearly all of the discs around low-mass stars are still found to have dispersed within 20 Myr (Pecaut & Mamajek 2016).

In light of the above results, a new class of long-lived discs around low-mass stars have recently been discovered, termed ‘Peter Pan’ discs (Lee, Song & Murphy 2020; Silverberg et al. 2020). For example, Silverberg et al. (2016) observed that the 45-Myr-old |$0.11\, {\rm M}_{\odot }$| M-dwarf WISE J080822.18–644357.3 has an infrared excess (indicative of circumstellar material) and in the same system Murphy, Mamajek & Bell (2018) found significant H α emission (indicative of accretion). Flaherty et al. (2019) observed this system with ALMA, finding a |${\lt}16\, {\rm au}$| mm continuum disc but no CO gas detection. The lack of CO detection, and hence possibly gas, is apparently at odds with the measured accretion. However, there is evidence that primordial CO depletes on approximately few Myr time-scales (e.g. Zhang et al. 2019), while secondary generations of CO due to processes like collisions are observable in debris discs (e.g. Matrà et al. 2017). It may therefore be the case that the disc is simply CO dark. A number of other Peter Pan discs have now been discovered with ages ranging from 42 to 55 Myr, all around low-mass stars (Silverberg et al. 2020). Although the frequency with which these Peter Pan discs occur is currently unknown, it is important for understanding disc evolution and planet formation generally to understand why these discs can survive for more than an order of magnitude longer than typical disc lifetimes. Making a first attempt at doing so is the objective of this paper.

Key to understanding how discs can survive for a long time is the disc dispersal processes. Discs are depleted and dispersed in a number of ways, including the following:

  • Gas accretion through the disc on to the star (e.g. Lynden-Bell & Pringle 1974; Suzuki & Inutsuka 2009; Manara et al. 2016).

  • The host star drives a photoevaporative wind from the inner disc (e.g. Ercolano & Pascucci 2017).

  • The ambient stellar cluster UV field drives a photoevaporative wind from the outer disc (e.g. Adams et al. 2004; Facchini, Clarke & Bisbas 2016; Haworth & Clarke 2019).

  • Gas is accreted by growing planets (e.g. Coleman, Papaloizou & Nelson 2017).

How these processes interplay and dominate at different epochs is still an area of active research.

In addition to dispersal, the initial conditions of discs are still only weakly constrained due to the rapid and highly obscured nature of disc assembly and early evolution. Although there are some examples of class 0 discs being discovered (Murillo et al. 2013), the properties of discs in clusters have only been surveyed down to |${\sim}1\,$| Myr (e.g. Ribas et al. 2014). Furthermore, Haworth et al. (2020) recently demonstrated that low-mass stars could support axisymmetric discs that are much more massive than previously thought.

Peter Pan discs are likely to require unusually slow dispersal and/or unusually massive initial conditions. In this paper, we use disc evolutionary models to explore which combinations of the above factors permit the existence of Peter Pan discs.

2 PHYSICAL MODEL AND PARAMETERS

2.1 Gas disc model

The gas disc model that we use closely follows that presented in Coleman & Nelson (2014, 2016), with the addition of a photoevaporative wind that is driven by UV radiation from external sources, i.e. nearby massive stars. To determine the evolution of the gas disc, we solve the standard diffusion equation for a 1D viscous α-disc model (Shakura & Sunyaev 1973), but stress that the viscous prescription used here is meant only as a proxy for the mass flow through the disc and that other processes that induce a mass flow through the disc (e.g. magnetically driven disc winds; Kunitomo, Suzuki & Inutsuka 2020) should yield similar results. Disc temperatures are calculated by balancing blackbody cooling against viscous heating and stellar irradiation. We include an active turbulent region that increases the value of α in the inner regions of disc where T ≥ 1000 K, mimicking the effect of fully developed turbulence forming in these regions (Umebayashi & Nakano 1988; Desch & Turner 2015). While the disc loses mass when it is accreted by the central star, it also loses mass through a photoevaporative wind due to the high-energy photons emanating from the central star. This wind is driven from the surface layers of the disc (Dullemond et al. 2007) and we follow Coleman & Nelson (2014) for its implementation.1

2.2 External photoevaporation

External photoevaporation of a disc by radiation from nearby stars can play an important role in setting the evolution of the disc mass (Mann et al. 2014; Ansdell et al. 2017) radius (Eisner et al. 2018) and lifetime (Guarcello et al. 2016; Concha-Ramírez et al. 2019; Sellek, Booth & Clarke 2020; Winter et al. 2020) even in weak UV environments (Haworth et al. 2017).

We follow the far-UV-driven photoevaporation prescription of Matsuyama, Johnstone & Hartmann (2003), in which the change in the gas surface density Σ is equal to
(1)
where Rg,fuv is the gravitational radius (at which material is unbound) and |$\dot{M}_{\rm w}(R_{\rm d})$| is the mass-loss rate for a disc of size Rd. We want to explore the effects of different mass-loss rates, so consider the mass-loss rate at the initial disc size |$\dot{M}_{\rm w,\,0}$| as a free parameter and scale this with the disc radius as it evolves as
(2)
where Rini is the initial disc size. We do not consider extreme UV (EUV)-driven mass-loss since, as we will demonstrate, Peter Pan discs require low-UV environments, where EUV radiation is negligible.

More sophisticated approaches to computing the mass-loss rate do exist, such as the fried grid of mass-loss rates (Haworth et al. 2018). However, as we will show here, Peter Pan discs require extremely low external photoevaporation rates that are of the order of floor value in fried and hence limit its applicability. We therefore opt at this stage to retain the simpler but well-controlled approach to setting the external photoevaporation mass-loss rate described above.

2.3 Initial disc parameters

With the stars in the Peter Pan discs having spectral types of M4–M6 with temperatures consistent with low-mass stars, e.g. ∼3000 K (Lee et al. 2020; Silverberg et al. 2020), we run our simulations with a |$0.1 \, {\rm M}_{\odot }$| central star with a radius of |$1 \, {\rm R}_{\odot }$| and a temperature of 3000 K. This is similar to that used in previous work examining the formation of the TRAPPIST-1 planetary system (Coleman et al. 2019). We set the inner edge of the disc to be equal to a period of 3 d, while the outer edge of the disc, Rini, is set to 50, 100, or 200 au, to examine the effect it has on the evolution of the disc. For the initial mass of the disc, we follow Haworth et al. (2020), where they find the maximum mass that a gas disc of a specific size can be, before it becomes unstable to gravitational instability:
(3)
A key point in that work is that the maximum axisymmetric disc-to-star mass ratio increases with decreasing host star mass. Traditionally, disc masses were thought to be |${\le}30{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| of the stellar mass (regardless of stellar mass), and as such with equation (3) the maximum disc masses for low-mass stars are significantly in excess of that. For discs extending to |$200\, {\rm au}$|⁠, equation (3) would result in a maximum disc mass equal to |${\sim}75{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| of the stellar mass (⁠|$38{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| for a disc of size |$50\, {\rm au}$|⁠), while still remaining gravitational stable.

Given the relation for the maximum disc mass, in our simulations we use disc masses of 0.2–1 × Md, max. To examine the effects of the mass flow through the disc, we use values of α between 10−5 and 10−3, while for examining the effects of the mass-loss through external photoevaporation, we use mass-loss rates between 10−10  and |$10^{-7}\, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, {\rm yr^{-1}}$|⁠. For a full list of our simulations parameters, see Table 1.

Table 1.

Disc and stellar model parameters.

ParameterValue
Disc inner boundary0.0189 |$\, {\rm au}$| (3 d)
Disc outer boundary Rini[50, 100, 200]|$\, {\rm au}$|
Disc mass[0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1] × Md, max
α[10−3, 10−4, 10−5]
M  *|$0.1 \, {\rm M}_{\odot }$|
R  *|$1 \, {\rm R}_{\odot }$|
T  *3000 K
|$\dot{M}_{\mathrm{ w},\,0}$|[10−7, 10−8, 10−9, 10−10] |$\, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, {\rm yr^{-1}}$|
ParameterValue
Disc inner boundary0.0189 |$\, {\rm au}$| (3 d)
Disc outer boundary Rini[50, 100, 200]|$\, {\rm au}$|
Disc mass[0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1] × Md, max
α[10−3, 10−4, 10−5]
M  *|$0.1 \, {\rm M}_{\odot }$|
R  *|$1 \, {\rm R}_{\odot }$|
T  *3000 K
|$\dot{M}_{\mathrm{ w},\,0}$|[10−7, 10−8, 10−9, 10−10] |$\, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, {\rm yr^{-1}}$|
Table 1.

Disc and stellar model parameters.

ParameterValue
Disc inner boundary0.0189 |$\, {\rm au}$| (3 d)
Disc outer boundary Rini[50, 100, 200]|$\, {\rm au}$|
Disc mass[0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1] × Md, max
α[10−3, 10−4, 10−5]
M  *|$0.1 \, {\rm M}_{\odot }$|
R  *|$1 \, {\rm R}_{\odot }$|
T  *3000 K
|$\dot{M}_{\mathrm{ w},\,0}$|[10−7, 10−8, 10−9, 10−10] |$\, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, {\rm yr^{-1}}$|
ParameterValue
Disc inner boundary0.0189 |$\, {\rm au}$| (3 d)
Disc outer boundary Rini[50, 100, 200]|$\, {\rm au}$|
Disc mass[0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1] × Md, max
α[10−3, 10−4, 10−5]
M  *|$0.1 \, {\rm M}_{\odot }$|
R  *|$1 \, {\rm R}_{\odot }$|
T  *3000 K
|$\dot{M}_{\mathrm{ w},\,0}$|[10−7, 10−8, 10−9, 10−10] |$\, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, {\rm yr^{-1}}$|

3 UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS CAN A PETER PAN DISC BE PRODUCED?

Using our grid of evolutionary models, we constrain when Peter Pan discs result depending on the initial disc properties and the magnitude of disc dispersal processes. Ultimately, we find that low accretion and evaporation rates, coupled with high disc masses are required, which we now illustrate in turn.

Fig. 1 shows the mass accretion rate from our models over time, alongside observed Peter Pan disc ages and accretion rates (black points). The left-hand panel demonstrates that for a viscous α of 10−3, the accretion rate is sufficiently high that no models are compatible with the Peter Pan discs, even for extremely low evaporation rates. Only for a combination of a lower α = 10−4 (low accretion) and weak external photoevaporation (⁠|$\dot{M}_\mathrm{ w}\le 10^{-9}\, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, {\rm yr^{-1}}$|⁠) are our models consistent with the ages and accretion rates of observed Peter Pan discs, as shown in the right-hand panel of Fig. 1. Note, however, that for even lower values of |$\alpha \, (10^{-5})$| the discs are indeed long lived, but with current accretion rates lower than observed, as illustrated in Fig. 2. Our models therefore require mass flow rates through the disc compatible with an effective α ∼ 10−4 to be consistent with Peter Pan discs. This is towards the lower end of the typically suggested 10−4 < α < 10−2 range (e.g. Isella, Carpenter & Sargent 2009; Andrews et al. 2010; Mulders & Dominik 2012), though note that Pinte et al. (2016) recently measured α ≤ 10−4 in HL Tau.

Accretion rates over time for our models with viscous α = 10−3 (left-hand panel) and α = 10−4 (right-hand panel). Different colours correspond to different external photoevaporation rates and the thicknesses of the regions are set by the range of initial disc masses. The black points mark the observed accretion rates for Peter Pan discs (Lee et al. 2020; Silverberg et al. 2020). When the external photoevaporation rates are high, the disc lifetimes are too short compared to the Peter Pan discs. However, with lower photoevaporation rates ($\dot{M}_{\rm w,0}\le 10^{-9}\, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, {\rm yr^{-1}}$), we can match the observed accretion rates for lower α values.
Figure 1.

Accretion rates over time for our models with viscous α = 10−3 (left-hand panel) and α = 10−4 (right-hand panel). Different colours correspond to different external photoevaporation rates and the thicknesses of the regions are set by the range of initial disc masses. The black points mark the observed accretion rates for Peter Pan discs (Lee et al. 2020; Silverberg et al. 2020). When the external photoevaporation rates are high, the disc lifetimes are too short compared to the Peter Pan discs. However, with lower photoevaporation rates (⁠|$\dot{M}_{\rm w,0}\le 10^{-9}\, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, {\rm yr^{-1}}$|⁠), we can match the observed accretion rates for lower α values.

Accretion rates over time for our models with a low external photoevaporation rate and various values of viscous α parameter. If α is too high (α ∼ 10−3), the disc lifetime is too short for Peter Pan discs. Conversely, if α is too low (α ∼ 10−5), the accretion rates are lower than observed. We require α ∼ 10−4 for the simulated discs to be consistent with the observations.
Figure 2.

Accretion rates over time for our models with a low external photoevaporation rate and various values of viscous α parameter. If α is too high (α ∼ 10−3), the disc lifetime is too short for Peter Pan discs. Conversely, if α is too low (α ∼ 10−5), the accretion rates are lower than observed. We require α ∼ 10−4 for the simulated discs to be consistent with the observations.

Additionally, for those models that are consistent, we generally require higher mass discs than canonically assumed, as illustrated in Fig. 3. Most models require an initial disc-to-star mass ratio >0.25 in order to both survive long enough and have high enough an accretion rate. We reiterate that high disc-to-star mass ratios can be sustained around low-mass stars (Kratter & Lodato 2016; Haworth et al. 2020). For a given disc-to-star mass ratio, the more extended discs also more readily yield Peter Pan discs because the viscous/accretion time-scale is longer, as illustrated in Fig. 4. This can also allow the mass flow through the disc to be slightly larger, but even still α = 10−3 still appears too strong for results to be consistent with the observations.

Accretion rates over time for our models with a low external photoevaporation rate and α = 10−4, with selected individual models colour coded by their initial disc-to-star mass ratio. Most Peter Pan discs require Md > 0.25M*.
Figure 3.

Accretion rates over time for our models with a low external photoevaporation rate and α = 10−4, with selected individual models colour coded by their initial disc-to-star mass ratio. Most Peter Pan discs require Md > 0.25M*.

Accretion rates over time for our models with a low external photoevaporation rate and α = 10−3, broken down by initial disc size. With more extended discs, disc lifetimes are longer, allowing discs with high accretions to nearly be compatible with the Peter Pan discs.
Figure 4.

Accretion rates over time for our models with a low external photoevaporation rate and α = 10−3, broken down by initial disc size. With more extended discs, disc lifetimes are longer, allowing discs with high accretions to nearly be compatible with the Peter Pan discs.

4 DISCUSSION

4.1 Massive discs around low-mass stars?

We find that Peter Pan discs require extremely low-UV environments over their lifetime (⁠|${\lt}10$|G0), which are rare (Fatuzzo & Adams 2008; Winter et al. 2020). For example, approximating the solid curve of fig. 9 from Fatuzzo & Adams (2008) as a Gaussian, <0.1 per cent of discs would experience a UV field |${\lt}10 G_0$|⁠. This drops to 0.01 per cent for 5G0 and ∼10−5 per cent for 1G0. Note though that this is for all Galactic star formation and that nearby low-mass star-forming regions such as Taurus are sites of such weaker UV fields. Though even in such a region a prospective Peter Pan disc would need to be on the periphery or be embedded for a significantly long time to be shielded from the stronger UV fields in the denser part to the cluster, since even a short time (e.g. <1 Myr) of exposure to higher (⁠|${\gt}10 G_0$|⁠) UV environments would induce significant external photoevaporation rates, shortening the lifetime of the disc (see Fig. 1). We also find that Peter Pan discs require low mass accretion rates on to the star, compatible with an effective α ∼ 10−4 consistent with observed mass accretion rates for low-mass stars (Manara et al. 2017) as well as suggested values for α (Isella et al. 2009).

The other requirement is that the discs are initially massive and significantly extended. Initial disc-to-star mass ratios are canonically assumed to be |${\lt}25{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$|⁠, independent of the stellar mass; however, Haworth et al. (2020) recently showed that higher disc-to-star mass ratios are stable around low-mass (e.g. |$0.1\, \mathrm{ M}_\odot$|⁠) stars. Our results show that these higher disc-to-star mass ratios (⁠|${\gt}25{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| and sometimes |${\gt}50{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$|⁠) are necessary to produce the lifetimes and accretion rates of observed Peter Pan discs, even in weak UV environments and for low α. These discs also extend to ∼100–|$200\, {\rm au}$|⁠. These higher possible disc masses may be important for explaining the bountiful mass in planets being discovered around M dwarfs. However, the actual distribution of initial disc conditions is unknown. Given that the UV fields required to produce Peter Pan discs are very rare, this raises the notion that the required high initial disc mass for low-mass stars should be relatively common, which can be quantified as the population of Peter Pan discs is increased.

4.2 Why are Peter Pan discs around low-mass stars?

The question arises as to why Peter Pan discs have only been discovered around low-mass stars. To determine whether this is a consequence of only low-mass stars being capable of producing Peter Pan discs, we re-ran our models for the case of a solar mass star. Note that in this case the highest disc-to-star mass ratio is lower, following equation (3) (Haworth et al. 2020). Although we find that the lifetimes and accretion rates of the observed population of Peter Pan discs cannot be fully replicated with solar mass stars, the largest, most massive discs with low external photoevaporation of |$~10^{-10}\, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, {\rm yr^{-1}}$| and α ∼ 10−3–10−4 can survive to ∼50 Myr. So, in principle, we conclude that substantially older discs could be found around higher mass stars similar to the current population of Peter Pan discs. The lack of detection so far could just be a result of sampling due to there being more lower mass stars from the initial mass function. However, in the ∼10 Myr Upper Sco, Esplin et al. (2018) do find a higher primordial disc fraction around lower mass stars. It is possible that higher mass stars typically form in the denser parts of the cluster where the radiation field and hence external photoevaporative mass-loss would be higher and reduce the disc lifetimes. Alternatively, if more efficient transport of material through the disc (higher α) was a characteristic of discs around higher mass stars, this would similarly reduce the disc lifetime.

4.3 Implications for planet formation

The disc mass required for Peter Pan discs is much larger than those typically used in planet formation models; for example, Coleman et al. (2019) used disc masses between 2.7 and 8 per cent of the stellar mass extending out to |$10\, {\rm au}$|⁠. Interestingly, if we calculate the gas mass within |$10\, {\rm au}$| of the discs modelled here, we find they are equal to 0.75–7.5 per cent of the stellar mass, comparable to the masses used in Coleman et al. (2019). Therefore, it is plausible that the planetary systems around Peter Pan discs would be similar to those formed in Coleman et al. (2019) with a few subtle differences. With the larger and more extended disc, pebble accretion would continue for longer than in Coleman et al. (2019), and as such slightly more massive terrestrial and super-Earth mass planets would be able to form. Additionally, since the Peter Pan discs are much longer lived, then planet migration would occur for longer (e.g. Baruteau et al. 2014), which would result in the planets residing close to the central star. It would be expected though that the resulting planetary systems would contain a mix of systems containing long resonant chains (e.g. TRAPPIST-1; Gillon et al. 2017), as well as systems with planets not in resonance (e.g. GJ 1061; Dreizler et al. 2020).

5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

We use disc evolutionary models to investigate what kind of discs can have both the longevity and currently observed accretion rates of the newly discovered long-lived Peter Pan discs. We find that they require three key ingredients:

  • Unusually weak UV radiation environments such that the mass-loss rate is |${\le}10^{-9}\, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, {\rm yr^{-1}}$|⁠, otherwise the disc lifetime is too short (see Fig. 1).

  • Weak transport of material through the disc. In the α viscosity framework, this corresponds to α ∼ 10−4. A higher (canonical) accretion rate of α ∼ 10−3 yields too short a disc lifetime and weaker transport α ∼ 10−5 yields too low an accretion rate (see Fig. 2).

  • Even with (1) and (2), disc masses >0.25 times the stellar mass are typically required (see Fig. 3).

The constraints on external photoevaporation alone imply that Peter Pan discs are relatively rare, since they require extremely weak (and rare) UV environments of <10G0 (Fatuzzo & Adams 2008). This corresponds to being on the periphery of low-mass star-forming regions, or perhaps more likely, deeply embedded. Given that the required environments are rare, the requirements for the mass flow through the disc and the initial disc mass may provide some insight into the initial conditions of the wider population of discs around low-mass stars. These have important implications for planet formation around low-mass stars. Higher disc-to-star mass ratios are important for setting the mass budget in protoplanetary disc, while the mass flow through the disc impacts on the disc evolution and the movement of solids within the disc.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the anonymous referee, Cathie Clarke, and Richard Nelson for useful comments on the paper. GALC was funded by the Leverhulme Trust through grant RPG-2018-418. TJH was funded by a Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship. This research utilized Queen Mary’s Apocrita HPC facility, supported by QMUL Research-IT (http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.438045).

Footnotes

1

For low-mass stars, the mass-loss rates through internal photoevaporation are typically |$\dot{M}_{\rm int}\lt 10^{-10}\, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, {\rm yr^{-1}}$|⁠. Within our simulations, we use different values for the internal photoevaporation rate, but since they are typically much smaller than the mass accretion and external photoevaporation rates, we find negligible differences in disc lifetimes.

REFERENCES

Adams
 
F. C.
,
Hollenbach
D.
,
Laughlin
G.
,
Gorti
U.
,
2004
,
ApJ
,
611
,
360

ALMA Partnership
,
2015
,
ApJ
,
808
,
L3

Andrews
 
S. M.
,
Wilner
D. J.
,
Hughes
A. M.
,
Qi
C.
,
Dullemond
C. P.
,
2010
,
ApJ
,
723
,
1241

Andrews
 
S. M.
 et al. .,
2018
,
ApJ
,
869
,
L41

Ansdell
 
M.
,
Williams
J. P.
,
Manara
C. F.
,
Miotello
A.
,
Facchini
S.
,
van der Marel
N.
,
Testi
L.
,
van Dishoeck
E. F.
,
2017
,
AJ
,
153
,
240

Baruteau
 
C.
 et al. .,
2014
, in
Beuther
H.
,
Klessen
R. S.
,
Dullemond
C. P.
,
Henning
T.
, eds,
Protostars and Planets VI
.
Univ. Arizona Press
,
Tucson
, p.
667

Carpenter
 
J. M.
,
Mamajek
E. E.
,
Hillenbrand
L. A.
,
Meyer
M. R.
,
2006
,
ApJ
,
651
,
L49

Coleman
 
G. A. L.
,
Nelson
R. P.
,
2014
,
MNRAS
,
445
,
479

Coleman
 
G. A. L.
,
Nelson
R. P.
,
2016
,
MNRAS
,
457
,
2480

Coleman
 
G. A. L.
,
Papaloizou
J. C. B.
,
Nelson
R. P.
,
2017
,
MNRAS
,
470
,
3206

Coleman
 
G. A. L.
,
Leleu
A.
,
Alibert
Y.
,
Benz
W.
,
2019
,
A&A
,
631
,
A7

Concha-Ramírez
 
F.
,
Wilhelm
M. J. C.
,
Portegies Zwart
S.
,
Haworth
T. J.
,
2019
,
MNRAS
,
490
,
5678

Desch
 
S. J.
,
Turner
N. J.
,
2015
,
ApJ
,
811
,
156

Dreizler
 
S.
 et al. .,
2020
,
MNRAS
,
493
,
536

Dullemond
 
C. P.
,
Hollenbach
D.
,
Kamp
I.
,
D’Alessio
P.
,
2007
, in
Reipurth
B.
,
Jewitt
D.
,
Keil
K.
, eds,
Protostars and Planets V
.
Univ. Arizona Press
,
Tucson
, p.
555

Eisner
 
J. A.
 et al. .,
2018
,
ApJ
,
860
,
77

Ercolano
 
B.
,
Pascucci
I.
,
2017
,
R. Soc. Open Sci.
,
4
,
170114

Esplin
 
T. L.
,
Luhman
K. L.
,
Miller
E. B.
,
Mamajek
E. E.
,
2018
,
AJ
,
156
,
75

Facchini
 
S.
,
Clarke
C. J.
,
Bisbas
T. G.
,
2016
,
MNRAS
,
457
,
3593

Fatuzzo
 
M.
,
Adams
F. C.
,
2008
,
ApJ
,
675
,
1361

Flaherty
 
K.
,
Hughes
A. M.
,
Mamajek
E. E.
,
Murphy
S. J.
,
2019
,
ApJ
,
872
,
92

Gillon
 
M.
 et al. .,
2017
,
Nature
,
542
,
456

Guarcello
 
M. G.
 et al. .,
2016
,
preprint (arXiv:1605.01773)

Haworth
 
T. J.
,
Clarke
C. J.
,
2019
,
MNRAS
,
485
,
3895

Haworth
 
T. J.
,
Facchini
S.
,
Clarke
C. J.
,
Cleeves
L. I.
,
2017
,
MNRAS
,
468
,
L108

Haworth
 
T. J.
,
Clarke
C. J.
,
Rahman
W.
,
Winter
A. J.
,
Facchini
S.
,
2018
,
MNRAS
,
481
,
452

Haworth
 
T. J.
,
Cadman
J.
,
Meru
F.
,
Hall
C.
,
Albertini
E.
,
Forgan
D.
,
Rice
K.
,
Owen
J. E.
,
2020
,
MNRAS
,
494
,
4130

Isella
 
A.
,
Carpenter
J. M.
,
Sargent
A. I.
,
2009
,
ApJ
,
701
,
260

Kratter
 
K.
,
Lodato
G.
,
2016
,
ARA&A
,
54
,
271

Kunitomo
 
M.
,
Suzuki
T. K.
,
Inutsuka
S.-i.
,
2020
,
MNRAS
,
492
,
3849

Lee
 
J.
,
Song
I.
,
Murphy
S.
,
2020
,
MNRAS
,
494
,
62

Lynden-Bell
 
D.
,
Pringle
J. E.
,
1974
,
MNRAS
,
168
,
603

Mamajek
 
E. E.
,
2009
, in
Usuda
T.
,
Tamura
M.
,
Ishii
M.
, eds,
AIP Conf. Proc. Vol. 1158, Exoplanets and Disks: Their Formation and Diversity
.
Am. Inst. Phys
,
New York
, p.
3

Manara
 
C. F.
 et al. .,
2016
,
A&A
,
591
,
L3

Manara
 
C. F.
 et al. .,
2017
,
A&A
,
604
,
A127

Mann
 
R. K.
 et al. .,
2014
,
ApJ
,
784
,
82

Matrà
 
L.
 et al. .,
2017
,
ApJ
,
842
,
9

Matsuyama
 
I.
,
Johnstone
D.
,
Hartmann
L.
,
2003
,
ApJ
,
582
,
893

Mulders
 
G. D.
,
Dominik
C.
,
2012
,
A&A
,
539
,
A9

Murillo
 
N. M.
,
Lai
S.-P.
,
Bruderer
S.
,
Harsono
D.
,
van Dishoeck
E. F.
,
2013
,
A&A
,
560
,
A103

Murphy
 
S. J.
,
Mamajek
E. E.
,
Bell
C. P. M.
,
2018
,
MNRAS
,
476
,
3290

Pecaut
 
M. J.
,
Mamajek
E. E.
,
2016
,
MNRAS
,
461
,
794

Pinte
 
C.
,
Dent
W. R. F.
,
Ménard
F.
,
Hales
A.
,
Hill
T.
,
Cortes
P.
,
de Gregorio-Monsalvo
I.
,
2016
,
ApJ
,
816
,
25

Ribas
 
Á.
,
Merín
B.
,
Bouy
H.
,
Maud
L. T.
,
2014
,
A&A
,
561
,
A54

Sellek
 
A. D.
,
Booth
R. A.
,
Clarke
C. J.
,
2020
,
MNRAS
,
492
,
1279

Shakura
 
N. I.
,
Sunyaev
R. A.
,
1973
,
A&A
,
24
,
337

Silverberg
 
S. M.
 et al. .,
2016
,
ApJ
,
830
,
L28

Silverberg
 
S. M.
 et al. .,
2020
,
ApJ
,
890
,
106

Suzuki
 
T. K.
,
Inutsuka
S.-i.
,
2009
,
ApJ
,
691
,
L49

Umebayashi
 
T.
,
Nakano
T.
,
1988
,
Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.
,
96
,
151

Winn
 
J. N.
,
Fabrycky
D. C.
,
2015
,
ARA&A
,
53
,
409

Winter
 
A. J.
,
Kruijssen
J. M. D.
,
Chevance
M.
,
Keller
B. W.
,
Longmore
S. N.
,
2020
,
MNRAS
,
491
,
903

Zhang
 
K.
,
Bergin
E. A.
,
Schwarz
K.
,
Krijt
S.
,
Ciesla
F.
,
2019
,
ApJ
,
883
,
98

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)