Abstract
DNA damage plays a major role in mutagenesis, carcinogenesis and ageing. The vast majority of mutations in human tissues are certainly of endogenous origin. A thorough knowledge of the types and prevalence of endogenous DNA damage is thus essential for an understanding of the interactions of endogenous processes with exogenous agents and the influence of damage of endogenous origin on the induction of cancer and other diseases. In particular, this seems important in risk evaluation concerning exogenous agents that also occur endogenously or that, although chemically different from endogenous ones, generate the same DNA adducts. This knowledge may also be crucial to the development of rational chemopreventive strategies. A list of endogenous DNA‐damaging agents, processes and DNA adduct levels is presented. For the sake of comparison, DNA adduct levels are expressed in a standardized way, including the number of adducts per 106 nt. This list comprises numerous reactive oxygen species and products generated as a consequence (e.g. lipid peroxides), endogenous reactive chemicals (e.g. aldehydes and S‐adenosylmethionine), and chemical DNA instability (e.g. depurination). The respective roles of endogenous versus exogenous DNA damage in carcinogenesis are discussed.
Received on August 1, 2003; revised and accepted on March 11, 2004
Introduction
DNA damage plays a major role in mutagenesis, carcinogenesis and ageing. The chemical events that lead to DNA damage include hydrolysis, exposure to reactive oxygen substances (ROS) and other reactive metabolites. These reactions are triggered by exposure to exogenous chemicals or they can result from metabolic, endogenous processes. The concentrations and mutagenic potentials of known carcinogens to which we are exposed in our environment are insufficient to explain the high incidence of sporadic cancer that is actually seen in our population (Epe, 2002). Innate factors can also not suffice to explain this high incidence. Epidemiology shows that, in developed societies, exogenous factors are a necessary condition in about 75–80% of cancer cases (Doll and Peto, 1981; Trichopoulos et al., 1994). So, mutations due to DNA damage, caused by unidentified exogenous agents, and to an increase in endogenous damage modulated by exogenous factors must play a role in most cases of cancer, in addition to changes in gene expression due to exogenous conditions. A thorough knowledge of the types and prevalence of endogenous DNA damage can be considered essential for an understanding of the interaction of exogenous agents and influences with endogenous processes in the induction of cancer and other diseases. In particular, this is important for risk analysis concerning low dose environmental factors. Endogenous DNA damage occurs at a high frequency compared with exogenous damage and the types of damage produced by normal cellular processes are identical or very similar to those caused by some environmental agents (Jackson and Loeb, 2001). The study of endogenous damage is also of importance to chemoprevention. It is evident that if an approach could be developed leading to a decrease in endogenous DNA damage and endogenous mutations, the incidence of cancer and other diseases might be substantially reduced, even without a reduction in exogenous mutations.
Here we present a review of quantitative data on the occurrence of endogenous DNA adducts in humans.
Oxidative DNA damage
In living cells ROS are formed continuously as a consequence of metabolic and other biochemical reactions as well as external factors. These ROS include superoxide (O2–·), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radicals (OH·) and singlet oxygen (1O2) and they can oxidize DNA, which can lead to several types of DNA damage, including oxidized bases and single‐ and double‐strand breaks. DNA damage produced by ROS is the most frequently occurring damage.
Oxidatively modified DNA is, despite extensive DNA repair, abundant in many human tissues, especially in tumours (Iida et al., 2001; Li et al., 2002). Many defence mechanisms within the organism have evolved to limit the levels of reactive oxidants and the damage they induce (Slupphaug et al., 2003). Oxidative stress occurs when the production of ROS exceeds the body’s natural antioxidant defence mechanisms, causing damage to macromolecules such as DNA, proteins and lipids. ROS also inactivate antioxidant enzymes (Kono and Fidovich, 1982; Tabatabaie and Floyd, 1994). So, as pointed out by Epe (2002), any change in the endogenous generation of ROS or cellular antioxidants or in the efficiency of DNA repair should cause a corresponding modulation of the steady‐state levels of oxidative DNA modifications, which in turn should modulate the mutation rate and ultimately the cancer incidence. Epidemiological evidence from different studies points to reduced risks for cancer, particularly in the upper gastrointestinal tract and airways, associated with a diet rich in antioxidants and/or a high content of antioxidants in plasma samples (Loft and Poulsen, 1996).
Data suggest that the rate of damage decreases with age, possibly along with the decreasing rate of metabolism, whereas the steady‐state levels increase due to failing repair (Loft and Poulsen, 1996).
Apart from exogenous substances, the production of ROS occurs through a variety of endogenous processes. During mitochondrial respiration 1–5% of the oxygen undergoes single electron transfer, generating the superoxide anion radical (superoxide, O2–·) (Chance et al., 1979). This molecule shows limited reactivity but is converted to hydrogen peroxide by superoxide dismutase. Reduction of hydrogen peroxide to water is secured by catalase and glutathione peroxidase. However, in the presence of transition metals, such as iron and copper, hydrogen peroxide is reduced to hydroxyl radicals (HO·) (Loft and Poulsen, 1996). The reactivity of HO· is so great that it does not diffuse more than one or two molecular diameters before reacting with a cellular component (Pryor, 1986). It must be generated immediately adjacent to DNA to be able to oxidize it. It is likely that H2O2 serves as a diffusible, latent form of HO· that reacts with a metal ion in the vicinity of a DNA molecule to generate HO· (Marnett, 2000). This is called the Fenton reaction:
H2O2 + Fe2+ → ·OH + OH– + Fe3+
Chronic infections that elicit an inflammatory response are potent generators of ROS. Neutrophils produce oxygen bursts of superoxide radical and hydrogen peroxide, which can subsequently interact via the Haber–Weiss reaction to form the potent hydroxyl radical (Jackson and Loeb, 2001):
O2–· + H2O2 → O2 + OH· + OH–
Shen et al. (2000) exposed DNA to activated neutrophils or eosinophils and this resulted in 8‐oxo‐deoxyguanosine (8‐oxo‐dG) formation through a pathway that was blocked by antioxidant agents and enzymes. Another DNA oxidant is peroxynitrite (ONO2–). It is the product of nitric oxide, a vascular relaxant and neurotransmitter, and superoxide and although it generates small quantities of HO·, its protonated form (peroxynitrous acid, ONO2H) is an extremely reactive oxidant capable of oxidizing DNA independent of its ability to generate HO· (Richeson et al., 1998). Nitric oxide and superoxide are produced simultaneously in macrophages, so it can be assumed that elevated levels of ONO2– would be produced in activated inflammatory cells. Ambs et al. (1999) demonstrated an association between the occurrence of G→T transversions in the p53 gene of human colorectal cancers and the level of expression of the inducible form of nitric oxide synthase in gastric precancerous and cancerous lesions. Many studies found a relationship between increased levels of oxidized bases and cancer or inflammatory diseases like hepatitis, cirrhosis or Helicobacter pylori infection (Marnett, 2000). Exposure of DNA to ONO2– can form strand breaks and base oxidation products and can cause, in some systems, deamination of G and A, but the major product of reaction between DNA and ONO2– is 8‐nitro‐deoxyguanosine (Burcham, 1999). This adduct has a tendency to depurinate. It has also been shown that nitrogen oxide inhibits various DNA repair enzymes, such as FAPY glycosylase, which removes 8‐oxo‐guanine (8‐oxo‐G). This suggests that there may exist a synergism between the ability of nitrogen oxide to stimulate DNA damage by the generation of peroxynitrite and the ability to inhibit the repair of this damage (Laval et al., 1997; Jaiswal et al., 2001).
Figure 1 shows some oxidative DNA adducts. Among the oxidatively modified bases, 8‐oxo‐dG is apparently the most abundant but certainly the most investigated. Steady‐state levels of this adduct determined by the various techniques in human cells ranged over several orders of magnitude: between 0.07 and 145.25 adducts/106 nt (Higuchi and Lin, 1995; Spencer et al., 1996). It base pairs preferentially with adenine rather than cytosine and thus generates GC→TA transversion mutations after replication. Oxidative DNA damage is predominantly repaired by base excision repair (BER) enzymes. The rate of repair of purine lesions is slower than that of pyrimidine lesions (Jaruga and Dizdaroglu, 1996). Most of the damage is removed before the cell reaches replication, the stage at which damage can be fixed as a mutation. It is evident that variations in repair capability would affect the amount of oxidative DNA damage, and indeed some rare human diseases characterized by aberrant DNA repair (xeroderma pigmentosum, ataxia telangiectasia, Bloom’s syndrome and Fanconi’s anaemia) are also characterized by an elevated amount of 8‐oxo‐dG (Degan et al., 1995; Evans et al., 2000). NO, an inflammatory mediator, directly inhibits a key BER enzyme (hOgg1) responsible for BER of 8‐oxo‐G. NO‐mediated inhibition of DNA repair could thus contribute to the mutagenic environment of chronic inflammation (Jaiswal et al., 2001).
Other abundant oxidatively modified bases are the formamidopyrimidine adducts of adenine and guanine: 4,6‐diamino‐5‐formamidopyrimidine (FapyAdenine) and 2,6‐diamino‐4‐hydroxy‐5‐formamidopyrimidine (FapyGuanine) (Burgdorf and Carell, 2002). The latter is especially formed in the absence of oxygen by ionizing radiation and other ROS‐producing agents. This lesion is efficiently repaired by a special formamidopyrimidine glycosylase but it can lead to GC→CG transversions (Ono et al., 1995). Other modified adenine bases include 8‐oxo‐adenine (7,8‐dihydro‐8‐oxoadenine) and 2‐hydroxy‐2′‐deoxyadenosine. Oxidation of 2′‐deoxycytidine can lead to the formation of 5‐hydroxy‐2′‐deoxycytosine, 5‐hydroxy‐2′‐deoxyuridine and 5,6‐dihydroxy‐5,6‐dihydro‐2′‐deoxyuridine (Wagner et al., 1992).
Other oxidized bases are 5‐hydroxymethylthymidine, 5‐hydroxymethyluracil, uracil glycol, cytosine glycol and thymine glycol. 5‐Hydroxyuracil and uracil glycol are products of the oxidative deamination of deoxycytosine (dC). They are detected in comparable amounts to 8‐oxo‐dG in human DNA (Burcham, 1999). Oxygen radicals react with 5‐methylcytosine to oxidize the 5,6‐double bond; the intermediate product, 5‐methylcytosine glycol, then deaminates to form thymine glycol. Thymine glycol base pairs with A and results in a C→T transition (Marnett and Plastaras, 2001). It is a weak mutagen (Basu et al., 1989) and it blocks transcription and replication (Dianov et al., 2000). This lesion is primarily repaired by the BER pathway (Dianov et al., 2000). Of the pyrimidine‐derived lesions, 5‐hydroxy‐2′‐deoxycytosine (5‐OH‐Cyt) and 5‐hydroxyuracil (5‐OH‐Ura) have been shown to be potentially premutagenic lesions leading to GC→AT transitions and GC→CG transversions (Purmal et al., 1994). 5‐OH‐Cyt appears to be more mutagenic than any other product of oxidative DNA damage (Feig et al., 1994). 5‐Hydroxymethyluracil is generated through oxidation of the methyl group of thymine (Rogstad et al., 2002). This methyl group plays a major role in various DNA–protein interactions. This adduct thus interferes with the binding of transcription factors to DNA (Rogstad et al., 2002). This is a non‐mutagenic lesion but it is removed by higher organisms. This removal can trigger apoptosis as a consequence of chromosomal breakage and it can also result in deletion mutations (Rogstad et al., 2002).
Table I summarizes measurements of oxidative DNA adducts in human tissues and Table VI shows the types of mutations that can be induced by different oxidative DNA lesions.
Lipid peroxidation
The polyunsaturated fatty acid residues of phospholipids are extremely sensitive to oxidation. Lipid hydroperoxides are the initial products of unsaturated fatty acid oxidation, but they are relatively short lived. They are either reduced by glutathione peroxidases to unreactive fatty acid alcohols or they react with metals to produce epoxides, aldehydes, etc. The major aldehyde products of lipid peroxidation are crotonaldehyde, acrolein, 4‐hydroxynonenal (HNE) and malondialdehyde (MDA). These reactive substances damage DNA by the formation of exocyclic adducts. They block the Watson–Crick base pairing region and most of them are anticipated to be highly mutagenic. MDA appears to be the most mutagenic product of lipid peroxidation, whereas HNE is the most toxic (Esterbauer et al., 1990).
The levels of DNA adducts in rodent and human tissues and leucocytes were found to be highly variable and to be affected by lifestyle, the dietary intake of antioxidants and the type and amount of fatty acids and persistent chronic infections or inflammation, in which nitric oxide is often overproduced (Bartsch, 1999). Consumption of a diet high in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) has been shown to cause an increase in propano‐, etheno‐ and malondialdehyde‐derived adducts in human leucocyte DNA in women but not in men (Fang et al., 1996; Nair et al., 1997). It could be suggested that etheno and propano adducts are involved in carcinogenesis because they have been detected in target tissues of rodents treated with carcinogens such as vinyl chloride, ethyl carbamate and N‐nitrosopyrrolidine (Chung et al., 1996). Table II summarizes measurements of lipid peroxidation induced DNA adducts in human tissues.
Propano adducts
These adducts appear to be derived by reaction of DNA with acrolein, crotonaldehyde and HNE, all generated by lipid peroxidation. Crotonaldehyde and acrolein are also widespread in the environment: they are generated by burning fats and by cigarette smoking. Crotonaldehyde can also react with H2O to form 3‐hydroxybutanal, which reacts with DNA to produce the Schiff base N2‐(3‐hydroxybut‐1‐ylidene)dG as well as several diastereomers of N2‐paraldol‐dG (Hecht et al., 2001) (Figure 2). HNE is weakly mutagenic but appears to be the major toxic product of lipid peroxidation (Esterbauer et al., 1991). It modulates the expression of genes that are involved in cell cycle control and apoptosis.
Pan and Chung (2002) showed that the rate of acrolein adduct formation is ∼5‐ to 10‐fold that of crotonaldehyde adducts, depending on the type of PUFA, and the rate of formation of HNE adducts from arachidonic acid is also considerably slower than that of acrolein adducts. The reactivity of enals toward dG decreases with the increasing chain length acrolein > crotonaldehyde > HNE (Pan and Chung, 2002). The numbers of propano adducts measured in humans ranged between 0.0006 and 0.40 adducts/106 nt (Nath and Chung, 1994; Chung, 2000).
Some rodent studies suggest that a higher level of 1,N2‐propano‐dG adducts occurs in tissues with a high fat content, such as brain, liver and colon (Nath et al., 1996). Studies in humans showed that intake of dietary fats increases the levels of these adducts in lymphocyte DNA of women (Fang et al., 1996; Nair et al., 1997).
Etheno adducts
The former aldehydes (acrolein, croton aldehyde and HNE) can be converted to epoxyaldehydes by different oxidative processes (Chung et al., 1996). The resulting epoxyaldehydes could modify DNA bases yielding etheno adducts. Epoxy aldehydes are more reactive towards DNA than the parent enals, especially the long‐chain enals (Chung et al., 1996). The reaction of epoxyaldehydes of acrolein (glycidaldehyde), crotonaldehyde (2,3‐epoxybutanal) and HNE (2,3‐epoxy‐4‐hydroxynonanal) give rise to four etheno adducts: 3,N4‐ethenodeoxycytidine (ϵdC), N2‐3‐ethenodeoxyguanosine (N2‐3‐ϵdG), 1,N2‐ethenodeoxyguanosine (1,N2‐ϵdG) and 1,N6‐ethenodeoxyadenosine (ϵdA) (Table III and Figure 3). These adducts are also formed from the carcinogens vinyl chloride and urethane (Bartsch and Nair, 2000). N2,3‐ϵdG levels in liver DNA were similar to levels of propano adducts, ∼2 orders of magnitude higher than ϵdA and ϵdC (Swenberg et al., 1995). Background ϵ adduct levels in tissues from humans and rodents were found to be highly variable, which in part may be associated with differences in dietary intake of antioxidants and/or ω‐6 PUFAs (Nair et al., 1999).
The ϵ bases mainly produce base pair substitution mutations. ϵdA is a highly mutagenic DNA lesion (Palejwala et al., 1993) and can lead to AT→GC transitions, to AT→TA and AT→CG transversions (Pandya and Moriya, 1996; Basu et al., 1999). ϵdC can lead to CG→AT transversions and CG→TA transitions (Palejwala et al., 1993; Moriya et al., 1994), N2,3‐ϵdG can lead to GC→AT transitions (Cheng et al., 1991) and 1,N2‐ϵdG to GC→TA and GC→CG transversions (Langouët et al., 1997). Pandya and Moriya (1996) indicated that the intrinsic mutagenic potency of ϵdA is comparable to that of ϵdC in mammalian cells. In vitro studies found that 1,N2‐ethenoguanine tends to strongly block replication and generate deletions, rearrangements, double mutants and base pair substitutions (Langouët et al., 1997; Akasaka and Guengerich, 1999). Table VI shows the types of mutations induced by etheno adducts.
Bartsch and Nair (2000) showed that the level of these DNA lesions was increased in conditions resulting in oxidative stress and known to be associated with an increased risk of cancer. Oxygen/nitrogen intermediates generated during inflammatory processes led to the formation of ϵ adducts, likely through peroxynitrite‐mediated lipid peroxidation and/or increased oxidative arachidonic acid metabolism. A high ω‐6 PUFA diet increased ϵ‐DNA adducts in white blood cells, particularly in female subjects. Nair et al. (1998) showed that NO over production in vivo is associated with the formation of etheno adducts.
Etheno bases are repaired efficiently by mammalian DNA glycosylases in vitro (Bartsch, 1999). ϵdC is removed by a human mismatch‐specific thymine‐DNA glycosylase (Hang et al., 1998; Saparbaev and Laval, 1998). 1,N2‐ethenoguanine is a primary substrate of human alkylpurine‐DNA‐N‐glycosylase (Saparbaev et al., 2002). It has been shown that the etheno adducts of adenine and cytosine appear to be repaired much more efficiently than the guanine adduct (Dosanjh et al., 1994).
MDA‐induced damage
MDA is a toxic and mutagenic metabolite produced by lipid peroxidation and in the biosynthesis of prostaglandin. It is highly mutagenic in bacterial and mammalian cells and carcinogenic in rats (Basu and Marnett, 1983; Spalding, 1988). MDA reacts with DNA to form adducts of dG [pyrimido[1,2‐α]purin‐10(3H)‐one (M1G)] (Figure 4), dA [N6‐(3‐oxopropenyl)deoxyadenosine (M1A)] and dC [N4‐(3‐oxopropenyl)deoxycytidine (M1C)]. The deoxyguanosine adduct (M1G) has been detected in liver, white blood cells, colon, pancreas and breast from healthy human beings (Marnett, 2002) and levels ranged between 0.062 and 0.9 adducts/106 nt (Chaudhary et al., 1994; Rouzer et al., 1997). Comparison of the yields of the various adducts produced in the reaction of MDA with DNA in vitro indicates that M1G is produced at roughly five times the amount of M1A while M1C is formed in trace amounts (Marnett, 2002). There is also considerable tissue‐to‐tissue variation observed in levels of M1G. M1G levels appear to increase with age and the unsaturated fatty acid content of the diet (Marnett, 1999).
Genotoxic substances derived from DNA oxidation: base propenals
Oxidation of DNA and other macromolecules leads to electrophilic mutagenic substances, such as base propenals (Dedon et al., 1998). Direct oxidation of DNA by agents that abstract the 4′‐hydrogen atom of the sugar backbone initiates a cascade of reactions that lead to the formation of these base propenals. Kadlubar et al. (1998) found a correlation between M1G and 8‐oxo‐dG, which seems consistent with the hypothesis that M1G is formed primarily by reaction of DNA with a base propenal (Dedon et al., 1998). According to Dedon et al. (1998), several lines of evidence suggest that base propenals derived from DNA are a more important source of M1G than lipid peroxide‐derived MDA. Indeed, these base propenals arise in immediate proximity to DNA. Plastaras et al. (2000) showed that base propenals are 30–150 times more potent than MDA in M1G formation and are 30–60 times more mutagenic than MDA. The order of reactivity is as follows: adenine propenal > cytosine propenal > thymine propenal > MDA (Plastaras et al., 2000). The most common sequence changes induced by MDA were base pair substitutions (see Table VI). Of these, 43% were transversions, most of which were G→T, and 57% were transitions and consisted exclusively of C→T and A→G (Marnett, 1999). These are mutations frequently detected in oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes from human tumours (Marnett, 2002).
Endogenous oestrogens
Several oestrogen metabolites can cause DNA damage directly or indirectly, through redox cycling processes that generate reactive radical species (Yager and Liehr, 1996). In oestrogen‐induced carcinogenesis, oestrogen metabolites, particularly catechol oestrogens (CEs), are involved in the initiation process through oxidative DNA damage and oestrogens themselves enhance cell proliferation, leading to tumour promotion (Hiraku et al., 2001). Oestrogen‐induced direct or indirect DNA damage in vitro or in rodents include single‐strand breaks, 8‐hydroxylation of guanine bases, bulky DNA adducts (unknown structure), estradiol‐induced MDA adducts and oestrogen–DNA adducts (Liehr, 2000).
Oxidation of estradiol (E2) by specific cytochrome P‐450 isoforms includes formation of 2,3‐ and 3,4‐catechols. The catechols are inactivated by O‐methylation mediated by catechol O‐methyltransferase as well as by glucuronidation and sulphation (Martucci and Fishman, 1993). The metabolic clearance of 4‐hydroxy‐E2 is slower than that of 2‐hydroxy‐E2 (Roy et al., 1990).
If this inactivation is incomplete, CEs may be oxidized to semiquinones (CE‐SQ) and quinones (CE‐Q) by redox cycling. This process consists of organic hydroperoxide‐dependent oxidation of the CE to the quinone and NADPH‐dependent cytochrome P450 reductase‐catalysed reduction of the quinone intermediate back to the CE. The semiquinone free radical is an intermediate in each of these metabolic conversions. It may react with molecular oxygen and form quinone and superoxide radicals. Alternatively, non‐enzymatic redox couples between copper ions and CEs also generate reactive oxygen radicals. Thus, metal ion‐catalysed or enzyme‐mediated redox cycling results in the continuous formation of free radicals (Liehr, 2000).
Direct damage
CE‐Q is inactivated by conjugation with glutathione or by reduction to CE. If these two inactivating processes are incomplete, CE‐2,3‐Q reacts with DNA to form stable adducts [N2‐(2‐hydroxyestron‐6‐yl)deoxyguanosine (2‐OHE1‐6‐N2dG) and N6‐(2‐hydroxyestron‐6‐yl)deoxyadenosine (2‐OHE1‐6‐N6dA)] that remain in DNA unless repaired (Dwivedy et al., 1992; Stack et al., 1996). The other quinone, estradiol-3,4-quinone and estrone-3,4-quinone (CE‐3,4‐Q) can react with DNA to form depurinating adducts. These adducts are lost from DNA by cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving apurinic sites. CE‐Q leads to the formation of following adducts (Li et al., 1998; Stack et al., 1996): 7‐[4‐hydroxyestron‐1(α,β)‐yl]guanine [4‐OHE1‐1(α,β)‐N7Gua], 7‐[4‐hydroxyestradiol‐1(α,β)‐yl]guanine [4‐OHE2‐1(α,β)‐N7Gua] (Figure 5), 3‐[4‐hydroxyestron‐1(α,β)‐yl]adenine [4‐OHE1‐1(α,β)‐N3Ade], 3-[4‐hydroxyestradiol‐1(α,β)‐yl]adenine [4‐OHE2‐1(α,β)‐N3Ade], 2‐OHE1‐6‐N2dG and 2‐OHE1‐6‐N6dA. Exposure of DNA in vitro to CE‐3,4‐Q leads to the depurinating adduct 7‐[4‐hydroxyestron‐1(α,β)‐yl]guanine or 7‐[4‐hydroxyestradiol‐1(α,β)‐yl]guanine [4‐OHE1(E2)‐1(α,β)‐N7Gua] (Cavalieri et al., 1997). The 4‐CE that form predominantly depurinating adducts are carcinogenic, whereas the non‐carcinogenic 2‐CE exclusively form stable DNA adducts (Cavalieri et al., 2000).
Indirect damage
Redox cycling generated by enzymatic reduction of CE‐Q to CE‐SQ and subsequent autoxidation back to CE‐Q by oxygen forms superoxide radicals and hydroxy radicals (Figure 6).
Secondarily, oestrogens can cause macrophage proliferation and activation (Cavalieri et al., 2000). On stimulation, macrophages produce oxidants such as O2–· and H2O2. Furthermore, they produce nitric oxide, which can interact with O2–· to form peroxynitrite, a very potent oxidant (Cavalieri et al., 2000). Yoshie and Ohshima (1998) have demonstrated that DNA strand breakage is induced synergistically in the presence of both a NO‐releasing compound [2-(N,N‐diethylamino)‐diazenolate‐2‐oxide.diethylammonium salt] and a CE. Oestrogens can also affect the function of polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMNs) resulting in the release of oxidants, including hypochlorite/hypochlorous acid (HOCl/OCl–) (Jansson, 1991; Frenkel, 1992). 2‐Hydroxylated oestrogens, however, act as powerful inhibitors of PMN activity, possibly one of the protective properties of the 2‐hydroxylated CE.
Endogenous alkylating agents
Besides oxygen, living cells contain several other small reactive molecules that might cause DNA damage. The most important of these is S‐adenosylmethionine (SAM). It is a reactive methyl group donor contributing to physiological enzymatic DNA methylation, which plays a role in regulation of gene expression (Holliday and Ho, 1998). However, mutagenic adducts can also be formed (Stern et al., 2000). Rydberg and Lindahl (1982) showed that purified DNA can be non‐enzymatically methylated by SAM and, as this reaction probably occurs to the same extent in vivo, they expect that an intracellular concentration of 4 × 10–5 M SAM generates 4000 7‐methylguanine, 600 3‐methyladenine and 10–30 O6‐methylguanine residues per day in a mammalian cell. Other endogenous methylation agents are betaine and choline and simple alkylating agents. The latter may be formed endogenously from cellular precursors, but they may also originate from exogenous sources such as diet, tobacco smoke or environmental pollution. Some of these sources may be so common that most humans are exposed to small amounts and it is difficult to apportion the exogenous and endogenous contributions (Zhao et al., 1999). Examples are N‐nitroso compounds.
Table IV summarizes measurements of alkylated DNA adducts in human tissues. The most frequent effect of DNA methylation is the generation of 7‐methylguanine and 3‐methyladenine. 7‐Methylguanine is relatively harmless, because this modification does not alter the coding specificity of the base. However, destabilization of the glycosyl bond due to N‐7 substitution on guanine results in generation of mutagenic apurinic (AP) sites and imidazole ring opening of 7‐methylguanine, which results in the stoppage of DNA replication (Barbarella et al., 1991; Tudek et al., 1992). 3‐Methyladenine is a cytotoxic DNA lesion that blocks replication. All living cells have an efficient DNA glycosylase that removes 3‐methyladenine from DNA, generating an AP site. Atamna et al. (2000) showed that the activity of this enzyme decreases with age. 7‐Methylguanine is poorly repaired and might be expected to accumulate to a measurable degree in the DNA of mammalian cells, although the chemical lability of the 7‐methylguanine–deoxyribose bond ensures that a steady‐state of base modification and loss would be achieved within a few days. Measurements in humans ranged between 0.028 and 7.2 7‐methylguanine/106 nt (Shields et al., 1990; Kato et al., 1993) but stayed generally below 1 adduct/106 nt. 3‐Methyladenine was found in human cells at 0.094 adducts/106 nt/day (Rydberg and Lindahl, 1982). SAM also generates the minor pyrimidine lesions 3‐methylthymine and 3‐methylcytosine. 3‐Methylthymine blocks DNA replication in vivo (Huff and Topal, 1987) and 3‐methylcytosine is a strong inhibitor of DNA synthesis and could be responsible for the mutagenesis observed after cell treatment with alkylating agents (Boiteux and Laval, 1982; Saffhill, 1984).
Some other alkylated and highly mutagenic DNA lesions of endogenous origin are O6‐methylguanine (Figure 7), O4‐methylthymine and O4‐ethylthymine. They can cause GC→AT and TA→CG transitions during DNA replication (Gerchman and Ludlum, 1973; Abbot and Saffhill, 1979; Saffhill, 1985; Singer et al., 1986) (see Table VI). Compared with N‐alkylation products, however, the detection of O‐alkylated adducts in human tissues is difficult, because of their low yield and rapid rate of repair (Lindahl, 1982; Pegg, 1983). O6‐methylguanine is repaired by ubiquitous O6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferases which demethylate O6‐methylguanine in cellular DNA and transfer the methyl group to one of their active site cysteine residues (Pegg et al., 1995). The mean value of the ratio of O6‐methylguanine to O4‐methylthymine is about six (Kang et al., 1995). Measurements of O6‐methylguanine in humans ranged between 0.0014 and 0.22 adducts/106 nt (Shields et al., 1990; Kang et al., 1995) and measurements of O4‐methylthymine ranged between 0.003 and 0.42 adducts/106 nt (Kang et al., 1995). They are both formed by N‐nitroso compounds, potential human carcinogens. Humans are exposed to N‐nitroso compounds (e.g. N‐nitrosodimethylamine) through nitrite‐treated meat and other nitrate‐ or nitrite‐containing food, in the workplace, from cigarette smoke (Blömeke et al., 1996) and through endogenous formation in the oral cavity, stomach, lungs and by bacteria and macrophages in infected or inflamed organs (Bartsch et al., 1990).
Nitrosated bile salts are carboxymethylating agents which predominantly form N7‐carboxymethylguanine when they react with DNA. N3‐Carboxymethyladenine and O6‐carboxymethylguanine are formed as minor products (O’Driscoll et al., 1999).
Cadet et al. (1999) described the formation of cyclic adducts of purine DNA bases after reaction with two aldehyde compounds, 4,5‐dioxovaleric acid and 2,4‐decadienal, which are involved in 5‐aminolaevulinic acid accumulation and lipid peroxidation.
7‐(2‐Hydroxyethyl)‐guanine adducts are formed by exogenous exposure to ethylene oxide, a known carcinogen, which besides being an industrial chemical is also a component of cigarette smoke. Ethene, which can be metabolically converted to ethylene oxide, is also formed endogenously from several possible sources, including lipid peroxidation of unsaturated fats, oxidation of free methionine, oxidation of hemin in haemoglobin and metabolism by intestinal bacteria (Törnqvist et al., 1989). Measurements in humans ranged between 0.0095 and 1.90 7‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐guanine/106 nt (Van Delft et al., 1994; Bolt et al., 1997) but lay mostly below 1 adduct/106 nt. Kumar and Hemminki (1996) revealed that the level of 7‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐guanine was twice the level of 7‐methylguanine adducts in total white blood cells, whereas in isolated lymphocytes it was at least four times more than the 7‐methylguanine adduct.
In vivo many (but not all) methylated adducts are removed from DNA via the BER pathway, in which the modified bases are recognized by DNA glycosylases, leaving an abasic site (Ye et al., 1998). The resulting abasic sites are potentially mutagenic if left unrepaired. Atamna et al. (2000) showed that human leucocytes isolated from old donors possess a reduced activity of glycosylases that remove methylated bases, suggesting a decline in the activity of BER. Zhao and Hemminki (2002), on the other hand, showed that at steady‐state the levels of DNA alkylation products are independent of age, suggesting that the ratio between endogenous DNA damage, through methylation or lipid peroxidation, and the repair of such damage may not be altered in lymphocytes of older individuals.
DNA hydrolysis
The glycosidic bond between bases and deoxyribose in DNA is labile under certain conditions, such as heating, alkylation of bases or the action of N‐glycosylases (Lindahl, 1982). Cleavage of the glycosidic bond in DNA leads to an abasic site. AP sites are not only produced by spontaneous depurination but to a large extent also by ROS (Nakamura et al., 2000). Abasic sites are among the most frequent endogenous lesions found in DNA, with an estimated 10 000 lesions/human cell/day (Lindahl, 1993). Nakamura and Swenberg (1999) found levels corresponding to 50 000–200 000 AP sites/genome in many human and rodent tissues. Table V summarizes measurements of AP sites in human tissues. In DNA purines are lost at a 20 times higher rate than pyrimidines (Lindahl and Karlström, 1973).
The number of endogenous AP sites varied widely between tissues but not within tissues (Nakamura and Swenberg, 1999). The brain is the most affected organ, followed by colon and heart, and then liver, lung and kidney (Nakamura and Swenberg, 1999). Atamna et al. (2000) showed that the number of AP sites in human leucocytes from old donors was about seven times that in young donors, apparently due to a decline in BER activity.
The major process in the repair of AP sites is the type II AP endonuclease‐/β‐polymerase‐dependent pathway (Dianov et al., 1992). AP sites are repaired rapidly and efficiently (Lindahl, 1993, 1996). Nakamura and Swenberg (1999) found high steady‐state levels of AP sites in human liver (8–9 sites/106 nt). So the fraction of AP sites that escapes repair is likely to contribute to mutations, chromosome aberrations and transcription errors (Nakamura and Swenberg, 1999).
Typical AP sites induce base pair substitutions (primarily AP site→T) (Gentil et al., 1990; Lawrence et al., 1990) (see Table VI). The 5′‐cleaved AP sites might also induce frameshift mutations, such as those detected in micro satellite sequences following treatment of plasmids with H2O2 (Jackson et al., 1998). Abasic sites are mutagenic due to the preferential incorporation of adenine opposite abasic sites by DNA polymerases during replication (Jackson and Loeb, 2001).
Hydrolytic deamination
DNA bases are susceptible to hydrolytic deamination, although deamination is much less frequent in double‐stranded compared to single‐stranded DNA (Lindahl, 1993). Cytosine and its homologue 5‐methylcytosine are the main targets (Lindahl, 1993). Between 100 and 500 cytosines/cell/day are deaminated to uracil (Lindahl, 1993). DNA contains a fifth distinct base, 5‐methylcytosine, which base pairs with guanine. At CpG sequences it is involved in silencing gene expression (Li et al., 1992). 5‐Methylcytosine is a preferred target for spontaneous mutagenesis, primarily because of the fact that 5‐methylcytosine can be deaminated three to four times more rapidly than cytosines (Lindahl, 1979) and secondarily because of the different rates of DNA repair. The deaminated form of cytosine is very rapidly excised by the abundant uracil‐DNA glycosylase to generate a base‐free site, which is efficiently corrected. The GT base pair, formed by deamination of 5‐methylcytosine, is a substrate for mismatch correction systems, but these processes are slow (Lindahl, 1993). As a consequence, GC→AT transitions at sites of cytosine methylation account for about one‐third of the single site mutations that cause inherited disease in humans (Cooper and Youssoufian, 1988). The same base change is frequent in mutated p53 tumour suppressor genes found in many human cancers (Rideout et al., 1990). Chen et al. (1998) found that cytosine methylation greatly enhances guanine alkylation at all CpG sites in the p53 gene by many different carcinogens. These findings suggest that mutational hot‐spots at methylated CpG sequences in the p53 gene may in part be a consequence of preferential carcinogen binding at these sites.
In comparison with the deamination of cytosine to uracil, the deamination of DNA purines is a minor reaction. Adenine is converted to hypoxanthine at 2–3% of the rate of cytosine deamination (Karran and Lindahl, 1980). Hypoxanthine pairs with C rather than with T and can thus form a mutagenic lesion. Because of the low cellular level of hypoxanthine‐DNA glycosylase, the repair reaction is less efficient than that of deaminated cytosine (Hill‐Perkins et al., 1986). The rate of deamination of guanine to xanthine is similar to adenine deamination (Lindahl, 1993). This lesion is less mutagenic because xanthine pairs with C. The xanthine–deoxyribose bond is also susceptible to spontaneous hydrolysis, which can generate an abasic site.
DNA damage by carbonyl stress
Reactive carbonyl species (RCS) are potent mediators of cellular carbonyl stress originating from endogenous chemical processes such as lipid peroxidation and glycation (Roberts et al., 2003). Glycation is a major source of RCS such as glyoxal and methylglyoxal.
Methylglyoxal is a biologically important carbonyl compound. It is a reactive aldehyde endogenously formed as a product of glucose metabolism, but is also found as a constituent of various beverages (coffee) and foodstuffs. It readily forms the cyclic 3‐(2′‐deoxy‐β‐d‐erythro‐pentafuranosyl)‐6,7‐dihydro‐6,7‐dihydroxy‐6‐methylimidazo[2,3‐b]purine‐ 9(8H)one adduct (MG‐3′‐dGMP) in human buccal epithelial cells. Vaca et al. (1998) measured 0.26 MG‐3′‐dGMP adducts/106 nt.
Decomposition products of lipid hydroperoxides include the reactive aldehyde glyoxal. It can also be formed by oxidative deoxyribose breakdown or autoxidation of sugars, such as glucose, and it plays a role in the pathophysiology of diabetes and ageing (Abordo et al., 1999). It readily forms DNA adducts, generating potential carcinogenic adducts such as glyoxalated deoxycytidine (Mistry et al., 2003) and it has been shown to be mutagenic in bacterial and mammalian cells (Murata‐Kamiya et al., 1997). Awada and Dedon (2001) reported that 2‐phosphoglycolaldehyde, formed by oxidation of the 3′‐position of deoxyribose, reacts with dG to form 1,N2‐glyoxal adducts. The formation of glyoxal‐dG adducts occurs almost five orders of magnitude more slowly with 2‐phosphoglycolaldehyde than with glyoxal.
Elevated tissue concentrations of RCS are observed in pathological conditions such as diabetes and in skin upon solar irradiation (Mizutari et al., 1997; Beisswenger et al., 1999). Acute treatment of cultured human keratinocytes with glyoxal resulted in pronounced DNA strand breaks, whereas methylglyoxal treatment resulted in cross‐linked DNA (Roberts et al., 2003).
Conclusion
One of the major endogenous sources of DNA damage is that produced by ROS and the most studied oxidative DNA adduct is 8‐oxo‐dG. Aldehydes derived from lipid peroxidation form another threat to DNA. Adducts formed are etheno‐, propano‐ and malondialdehyde‐derived DNA adducts. Several oestrogen metabolites can cause DNA damage directly or indirectly, through redox cycling processes that generate reactive radical species (Yager and Liehr, 1996). In addition to oxygen and lipid peroxidation products, living cells contain several other small reactive molecules that might cause DNA damage, like methylating agents. The main adducts formed are 7‐methylguanine, 3‐methyladenine, O4‐methylthymine, O6‐methylguanine and 7‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)guanine, of which O6‐methylguanine is the most mutagenic. Another, pathway for DNA damage is attack by water, causing hydrolysis of the glycosylic bond and resulting in the formation of mutagenic abasic sites in DNA. DNA bases are also susceptible to hydrolytic deamination. A last pathway for endogenous DNA damage is that caused by carbonyl stress.
The adduct level data concerning some of these processes show a wide range covering several orders of magnitude. In some cases, at least part of this wide range might be due to differences in analytical methods. Generally, for the quantification of oxidative DNA adducts, GC/MS gives high values, HPLC intermediate and enzyme‐based methods low values (Collins et al., 1997). We compared the levels of 8‐oxo‐dG measured in human lymphocytes by GC/MS (59.70 adducts/106 nt) with those measured by HPLC/EC (0.24–13.52 adducts/106 nt) (see Table I). GC/MS clearly gives higher values. Oxidation may occur during DNA isolation and hydrolysis before HPLC or GC‐MS; derivatization procedures for GC‐MS can lead to the oxidation of normal unaltered guanine resulting in a spuriously high yield of 8‐oxo‐G (Wagner et al., 1992; Collins et al., 1997). However, this artificial oxidation may be prevented by, for example, prepurifying the compounds of interest or by derivatization at low temperature or by addition of antioxidants to the silylating reagents (Cadet et al., 1999). HPLC, on the other hand, may underestimate the adduct levels due to incomplete enzymatic digestion of the DNA in the standard procedure (Schuler et al., 1997). Enzymatic methods to convert oxidative lesions to breaks might underestimate adducts as there may be some adducts that are inaccessible to the enzyme. On the other hand, an enzyme such as Fpg might recognize additional (unknown) base modifications, which might lead to an overestimation of the number of 8‐oxo‐G adducts (Collins et al., 1997). However, Anson et al. (2000) found that the FAPY glycosylase (Fpg) assay detected ∼90% of the 8‐oxo‐dG detected by HPLC/EC. For the quantification of etheno adducts, the 32P‐post‐labelling assay is probably one of the most sensitive methods available. However, quantification by this method is compromised by relatively high variability due to multiple steps and lack of an internal standard (Chung, 2000). Quantification, including immunoaffinity chromatography for adduct enrichment, can be poorly reproducible due to batch‐to‐batch preparation of antibody and ageing of antibody.
A number of techniques have been developed to detect alkyl DNA adducts, including immunological assays, fluorescence techniques, mass spectrometry, 32P‐post‐labelling and electrochemical detection. When 32P/HPLC was compared with GC/MS in quantifying 7‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)guanine from in vivo samples, a good qualitative agreement between methods with a correlation coefficient of 0.97 was obtained (Eide et al., 1999).
It should be taken into account that over the years, the different techniques have been adjusted to avoid artefacts. Bianchini et al. (2001) and Lenton et al. (1999), for example, took measurements to avoid artefactual DNA oxidation during HPLC/EC.
Endogenous DNA damage occurs at a high frequency compared with exogenous damage (Jackson and Loeb, 2001). The high prevalence of endogenous DNA damage corresponds with highly efficient repair of such damage, necessary for cell survival (Wood, 1996; Ochs et al., 1999). Most endogenous DNA damage is repaired by BER, O6‐methylguanine DNA‐methyltransferase (MGMT) and mismatch repair (Pegg et al., 1995; Seeberg et al., 1995; Prolla, 1998). The spontaneous dissociation of bases, a frequent form of endogenous DNA damage that can lead to AP sites, is efficiently repaired by BER (Frosina et al., 1994). O6‐methylguanine is repaired very efficiently by the direct repair enzyme MGMT. In spite of efficient repair, most mutations arise endogenously. Of particular significance for the thesis that most mutations in normal cells are of endogenous origin is the great similarity between the mutational spectra of HPRT genes in the lymphocytes of normal individuals from different population groups (Burkhart‐Schultz et al., 1996; Podlutsky et al., 1998). Also, the mean mutation frequency of a given gene locus (e.g. HPRT) in a given cell type for a given age group is approximately the same in diverse Western countries (Robinson et al., 1994). The same applies for different subgroups of the population in the same country (Tates et al., 1991). This suggests that the mutations are mainly due either to endogenous mechanisms of mutagenesis or to ubiquitous environmental influences.
Adduct levels were reported to vary according to gender, ethnicity and individual characteristics. Thus, for gender only women have been reported to have increased levels of DNA adducts arising from lipid peroxidation products in white blood cell DNA following consumption of PUFAs (Fang et al., 1996; Nair et al., 1997). This also holds true for exogenous adduct levels, as female smokers have been reported to have higher bulky DNA adduct levels in lung DNA than do male smokers (Rydberg et al., 1994). Mean 8‐oxo‐dG levels ranged from 0.1 to 40 adducts/105 dG residues and lower levels were observed in the Japanese population, as compared with western populations (Povey, 2000). 8‐Hydroxyguanine may be formed as a result of both endogenous and exogenous processes, so these differences may reflect environmental and/or genetic factors or variations in analytical and sampling techniques (Povey, 2000). Also, pronounced interindividual variations in the activity of enzymes that participate in the activation and inactivation pathways of carcinogen metabolism and in DNA repair pathways have been described (Autrup et al., 1986; Perera, 1996). A similar variability is expected concerning the reactions of endogenous genotoxic agents with DNA and repair of the lesions. Interindividual differences in the levels of endogenous DNA damage and risk of spontaneous tumour formation could therefore be expected (Lutz, 1990).
Some endogenous genotoxic substances are formed by more than one pathway. When considering chemopreventive strategies it might be important to know which metabolic pathway predominates in generating a given substance. An example is the reactive aldehyde glyoxal. It is a decomposition product of lipid hydroperoxides, but it can also be formed by oxidative deoxyribose breakdown or autoxidation of sugars. In addition, there are specific adducts that can be generated by different genotoxic substances. The M1G adduct, for example, can be formed by MDA as well as by base propenals. That we now know that M1G is primarily formed by base propenals rather than by MDA (Dedon et al., 1998) might be relevant to our thinking on chemoprevention.
Distinguishing between endogenous and exogenous DNA damage and determining the relative importance of both is a complex matter. Some exogenous mutagens also occur endogenously. Secondly, some exogenous substances, although chemically different from endogenous ones, generate the same DNA adducts. An example of adducts formed by exogenous mutagens that also occur endogenously are the exocyclic adducts formed by the reactive aldehydes acrolein and crotonaldehyde. These adducts are not only attributable to endogenous exposure, because acrolein and crotonaldehyde also occur exogenously as environmental contaminants. Methylglyoxal is another substance that is formed endogenously but can also be found in various foods and beverages. Vinyl chloride is an occupational and environmental pollutant that gives rise to 1,N6‐ethenoadenine and 3,N4‐ethenocytosine, adducts that are also formed endogenously by the products of lipid peroxidation. Smoking increases the levels of DNA adducts that also arise spontaneously. The amount of 8‐oxo‐dG appeared higher in human leucocytes after smoking (1.01 versus 0.66 adducts/106 nt) (Kiyosawa et al., 1990). Nath et al. (1998) measured higher acrolein‐dG and crotonaldehyde‐dG levels in gingival tissue of smokers than in that of non‐smokers (0.27 versus 0.091 and 0.11 versus 0.012 adducts/106 nt, respectively). The methylated DNA adduct 7‐methylguanine also occurred in higher amounts in different tissues of smokers (bronchus, lymphocytes, white blood cells and granulocytes) (Mustonen and Hemminki, 1992; Mustonen et al., 1993). In assessing the risks associated with exposure to certain exogenous DNA‐damaging agents the fact that they generate adducts of a type that is also generated by endogenous substances has to be taken into account. Indeed, exposure to such an agent can never take place in a ‘very low dose’ context as there is the background of endogenous exposure. An increase in the amount of this type of damage will probably induce a proportional biological effect.
With respect to the endogenous versus exogenous origin of mutations, it is worth noting that methylated CpG sequences, besides being involved in spontaneous mutagenesis processes, can also create preferential targets for environmental mutagens and carcinogens (Denissenko et al., 1997, 1998; Shen et al., 2000).
It seems likely that certain less frequent exogenous DNA lesions may have unexpectedly large biological effects due to their relatively inefficient removal by DNA repair. Exogenous DNA damage differs from the endogenous form in that it more often entails bulky DNA adducts that are removed preferentially by nucleotide excision repair (Sancar, 1995), a more complex and slower DNA repair process (Cox and Lane, 1995). This pathway also repairs dipyrimidine photoproducts, which are formed on DNA by UV light. Double‐strand breaks often arise by the action of exogenous agents. Double‐strand breaks are repaired in mammals by homologous recombination and to a large extent by error‐prone non‐homologous end‐joining (Shinohara and Ogawa, 1995; Strathern et al., 1995; Henle and Linn, 1997; Vamvakas et al., 1997; Critchlow and Jackson, 1998).
As argued above, most mutations arise spontaneously. In tumour cells, the mutations which can be specifically ascribed to exogenous agents represent a minority of all mutations. Only in a limited number of instances was a significant correlation found between the mutational spectra of tumour cells and the type of exogenous carcinogenic agent, e.g. aflatoxin B1 (Prieto‐Alamo et al., 1996; Lutz et al., 1998). These were instances in which the relative risk of cancer increased significantly (typically by more than 10 times) following exposure to exogenous agents, such as skin cancer caused by UV light (Nakazawa et al., 1994), lung cancer due to cigarette smoking and bladder cancer due to aromatic amines (Lutz et al., 1998). It must be emphasized that the association between exposure to exogenous agents and relative cancer risk does not necessarily imply that these agents have initiated carcinogenesis. These exogenous agents might well act as a necessary condition, and thus be considered as a cause of cancer, by acting at a later stage, contributing to accumulation of mutations or to tumour promotion after initiation has taken place. Initiated cells can be assumed to be more susceptible to the mutagenic action of exogenous agents. (Deman and van Larebeke, 2001) which then contribute to the continuing accumulation of mutations leading to malignant transformation and further progression. This is corroborated by the following observations. (i) Mutational spectra in the HPRT gene of normal lymphocytes from different human populations are similar. This suggests that they are predominantly due to endogenous mechanisms of mutagenesis (Podlutsky et al., 1998). (ii) Mutation spectra of the p53 oncogene in cancer cells from different types of tumours (e.g. lung versus brain) show substantial differences, reflecting the fact that they have partly been caused by different exogenous agents (Lutz et al., 1998). Deman and van Larebeke (2001) hypothesized that the most probable course of events in carcinogenesis is as follows. (i) Because of the low contribution of exogenous agents to the mutation rate of normal cells, initiation is expected to be chiefly due to endogenous causes. The exception might be a situation of acute excessive exposure to a carcinogenic agent. (ii) The mutation which brings about the enhancement of the mutation rate responsible for initiation is more often one which enhances the susceptibility to exogenous mutagenic agents than the susceptibility to endogenous causes of mutations. (iii) The same applies for subsequent mutations which further enhance the mutation rate in initiated cells.
Fig. 1. Some oxidative DNA adducts.
Fig. 1. Some oxidative DNA adducts.
Fig. 2. Propano adducts.
Fig. 2. Propano adducts.
Fig. 3. Etheno adducts.
Fig. 3. Etheno adducts.
Fig. 4. M1G.
Fig. 4. M1G.
Fig. 5. 4‐OHE1(E2)‐1‐(α,β)‐N7Gua (E1, R is =O; E2, R is –OH).
Fig. 5. 4‐OHE1(E2)‐1‐(α,β)‐N7Gua (E1, R is =O; E2, R is –OH).
Fig. 6. Metabolic redox cycling of catechol oestrogens.
Fig. 6. Metabolic redox cycling of catechol oestrogens.
Fig. 7.O6‐methylguanine.
Fig. 7.O6‐methylguanine.
Oxidative DNA damage
| Adduct | Method | Tissue | Quantity | Reference | |
| Adducts/106 nt | |||||
| 5‐Hydroxy‐2′‐deoxycytidine | HPLC/EC | Leukocytes | 3.1 ± 1.6 fmol/µg DNA | 1.02 | Wagner et al. (1992) |
| HPLC/ECa | Lymphocytes | 2.9 ± 1.4 adducts/106 dG | 0.58 | Lenton et al. (1999) | |
| GC/MS/SIM | Bronchial epithelium | 0.161 ± 0.005 nmol/mg DNA | 52.79 | Spencer et al. (1996) | |
| 5‐Hydroxy‐2′‐deoxyuridine | HPLC/EC | Leucocytes | 2.1 ± 1.8 fmol/µg DNA | 0.69 | Wagner et al. (1992) |
| 5,6‐Dihydroxy‐5,6‐dihydro‐2′‐deoxyuridine | HPLC/EC | Leucocytes | 6.2 ± 4.6 fmol/µg DNA | 2.03 | Wagner et al. (1992) |
| 8‐Oxo‐7,8‐dihydro‐2′‐deoxyguanosine | HPLC/EC | Human leucocytes | 3.5 ± 2.1 fmol/µg DNA | 1.15 | Wagner et al. (1992) |
| 32P/HPLC and HPLC/EC | Human leucocytes | 8 adducts/105 dG | 15.92 | Wilson et al. (1993) | |
| HPLC/EC | Leucocytes before versus after smoking | 3.3 ± 0.8 versus 5.1 ± 2.5 adducts/106 dG | 0.66 versus 1.01 | Kiyosawa et al. (1990) | |
| HPLC/EC | Leucocytes | 3.9 ± 0.26 adducts/105 dG | 7.76 | Degan et al. (1995) | |
| HPLC/EC | PMN leukocytes | 118 mol/106 mol dG | 23.48 | Bashir et al. (1993) | |
| GC/MS | Human peripheral lymphocytes | 30 adducts/105 dG | 59.70 | Podmore et al. (1998) | |
| HPLC/EC | Lymphocytes | 68 mol adducts/106 mol dG | 13.52 | Bashir et al. (1993) | |
| HPLC/ECa | Lymphocytes | 4.5 ± 1.8 adducts/106 dG | 0.90 | Lenton et al. (1999) | |
| HPLC/ECa | Lymphocytes | 1.19–2.17 adducts/106 dG | 0.24–0.43 | Bianchini et al. (2001) | |
| HPLC/EC | HeLa cells (mtDNA) | 0.35 adducts /106 dG | 0.07 | Higuchi and Lin (1995) | |
| HPLC/EC | Brain (mtDNA) | 15.78–27.34 adducts/105 dG | 31.40–54.41 | Mecocci et al. (1993) | |
| HPLC/EC | Brain (nDNA) | 1.25–2.70 adducts/105 dG | 2.49–5.37 | Mecocci et al. (1993) | |
| HPLC/EC | Brain (mtDNA) | 15.3–35.7 adducts/105 dG | 30.45–71.04 | Mecocci et al. (1994) | |
| HPLC/EC | Brain (nDNA) | 1.20–2.60 adducts/105 dG | 2.39–5.17 | Mecocci et al. (1994) | |
| GC/MS/SIM | Bronchial epithelium | 0.443 ± 0.095 nmol/mg DNA | 145.25 | Spencer et al. (1996) | |
| Fpg/Southern blot | mtDNA | 5 adducts/106 bases | 5.00 | Anson et al. (2000) | |
| HPLC/EC | Sperm cells | 13 fmol/µg DNA | 4.26 | Fraga et al. (1991) | |
| HPLC/EC | Pancreas | 19 ± 6.1 add adducts/108 nt | 0.19 | Kadlubar et al. (1998) | |
| HPLC/EC | Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from controls | 11.1 ± 6.4 add./105 dG | 22.09 | Evans et al. (2000) | |
| Adduct | Method | Tissue | Quantity | Reference | |
| Adducts/106 nt | |||||
| 5‐Hydroxy‐2′‐deoxycytidine | HPLC/EC | Leukocytes | 3.1 ± 1.6 fmol/µg DNA | 1.02 | Wagner et al. (1992) |
| HPLC/ECa | Lymphocytes | 2.9 ± 1.4 adducts/106 dG | 0.58 | Lenton et al. (1999) | |
| GC/MS/SIM | Bronchial epithelium | 0.161 ± 0.005 nmol/mg DNA | 52.79 | Spencer et al. (1996) | |
| 5‐Hydroxy‐2′‐deoxyuridine | HPLC/EC | Leucocytes | 2.1 ± 1.8 fmol/µg DNA | 0.69 | Wagner et al. (1992) |
| 5,6‐Dihydroxy‐5,6‐dihydro‐2′‐deoxyuridine | HPLC/EC | Leucocytes | 6.2 ± 4.6 fmol/µg DNA | 2.03 | Wagner et al. (1992) |
| 8‐Oxo‐7,8‐dihydro‐2′‐deoxyguanosine | HPLC/EC | Human leucocytes | 3.5 ± 2.1 fmol/µg DNA | 1.15 | Wagner et al. (1992) |
| 32P/HPLC and HPLC/EC | Human leucocytes | 8 adducts/105 dG | 15.92 | Wilson et al. (1993) | |
| HPLC/EC | Leucocytes before versus after smoking | 3.3 ± 0.8 versus 5.1 ± 2.5 adducts/106 dG | 0.66 versus 1.01 | Kiyosawa et al. (1990) | |
| HPLC/EC | Leucocytes | 3.9 ± 0.26 adducts/105 dG | 7.76 | Degan et al. (1995) | |
| HPLC/EC | PMN leukocytes | 118 mol/106 mol dG | 23.48 | Bashir et al. (1993) | |
| GC/MS | Human peripheral lymphocytes | 30 adducts/105 dG | 59.70 | Podmore et al. (1998) | |
| HPLC/EC | Lymphocytes | 68 mol adducts/106 mol dG | 13.52 | Bashir et al. (1993) | |
| HPLC/ECa | Lymphocytes | 4.5 ± 1.8 adducts/106 dG | 0.90 | Lenton et al. (1999) | |
| HPLC/ECa | Lymphocytes | 1.19–2.17 adducts/106 dG | 0.24–0.43 | Bianchini et al. (2001) | |
| HPLC/EC | HeLa cells (mtDNA) | 0.35 adducts /106 dG | 0.07 | Higuchi and Lin (1995) | |
| HPLC/EC | Brain (mtDNA) | 15.78–27.34 adducts/105 dG | 31.40–54.41 | Mecocci et al. (1993) | |
| HPLC/EC | Brain (nDNA) | 1.25–2.70 adducts/105 dG | 2.49–5.37 | Mecocci et al. (1993) | |
| HPLC/EC | Brain (mtDNA) | 15.3–35.7 adducts/105 dG | 30.45–71.04 | Mecocci et al. (1994) | |
| HPLC/EC | Brain (nDNA) | 1.20–2.60 adducts/105 dG | 2.39–5.17 | Mecocci et al. (1994) | |
| GC/MS/SIM | Bronchial epithelium | 0.443 ± 0.095 nmol/mg DNA | 145.25 | Spencer et al. (1996) | |
| Fpg/Southern blot | mtDNA | 5 adducts/106 bases | 5.00 | Anson et al. (2000) | |
| HPLC/EC | Sperm cells | 13 fmol/µg DNA | 4.26 | Fraga et al. (1991) | |
| HPLC/EC | Pancreas | 19 ± 6.1 add adducts/108 nt | 0.19 | Kadlubar et al. (1998) | |
| HPLC/EC | Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from controls | 11.1 ± 6.4 add./105 dG | 22.09 | Evans et al. (2000) | |
Molecular weight of DNA 327.6 g/mol; human genome = 3.2 × 109 bp; 19.9% guanine, 30.2% adenine, 19.6% cytosine, 30.3% thymine (Snustad et al., 1997). HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; EC, electrochemical detection; GC/MS, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; SIM, selective ion monitoring; Fpg, formamidopyrimidine glycosylase; 32P, 32P‐post‐labelling.
aSpecial care was taken to avoid artefactual oxidation.
Epoxyaldehydes and their etheno adducts
| Aldehyde | Epoxyaldehyde | Adduct | Reference |
| Acrolein | Glycidaldehyde | 1,N2‐ethenoguanine | Golding et al. (1996) |
| Crotonaldehyde | 2,3‐Epoxybutanal | 1,N2‐ethenoguanosine | Nair and Offerman (1985) |
| 1,N6‐ethenoadenosine | |||
| 3,N4‐ethenocytidine | |||
| HNE | 2,3‐Epoxy‐4‐hydroxynonanal | 1,N2‐ethenodeoxyguanosine | Sodum and Chung (1988) |
| 1,N6‐ethenoadenine | Sodum and Chung (1991) | ||
| 3,N4‐ethenocytidine | Nair et al. (1999) | ||
| N2,3‐ethenodeoxyguanosine |
| Aldehyde | Epoxyaldehyde | Adduct | Reference |
| Acrolein | Glycidaldehyde | 1,N2‐ethenoguanine | Golding et al. (1996) |
| Crotonaldehyde | 2,3‐Epoxybutanal | 1,N2‐ethenoguanosine | Nair and Offerman (1985) |
| 1,N6‐ethenoadenosine | |||
| 3,N4‐ethenocytidine | |||
| HNE | 2,3‐Epoxy‐4‐hydroxynonanal | 1,N2‐ethenodeoxyguanosine | Sodum and Chung (1988) |
| 1,N6‐ethenoadenine | Sodum and Chung (1991) | ||
| 3,N4‐ethenocytidine | Nair et al. (1999) | ||
| N2,3‐ethenodeoxyguanosine |
Lipid peroxidation derived DNA adducts
| Adduct | Method | Tissue | Quantity | Reference | |
| Adducts/106 nt | |||||
| M1G | 32P/reversed phase HPLC | White blood cells | 2.6 ± 1.2 adducts/107 nt | 0.26 | Vaca et al. (1995) |
| Imafin/GC/EC NCI/MS | Leucocytes | 6.2 ± 1.2 adducts/108 bases | 0.062 | Rouzer et al. (1997) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Lung | 1.00 ± 0.40 adducts/107 nt | 0.1 | Yi et al. (1998) | |
| GC/EC NCI/MS | Pancreas | 32 ± 23 adducts/108 nt | 0.32 | Kadlubar et al. (1998) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Pancreas | 3.58 ± 1.46 adducts/107 nt | 0.36 | Yi et al. (1998) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Liver | 1.40 adducts/107 nt | 0.14 | Yi et al. (1998) | |
| GC/EC NCI/MS | Hepatic DNA | 9 adducts/107 bases or 5400 adducts/cell | 0.90 | Chaudhary et al. (1994) | |
| 32P/reversed phase HPLC | Breast tissue | 3.0 ± 1.3 adducts/107 nt | 0.30 | Vaca et al. (1995) | |
| EdA, EdC | Imafin/32P/TLC | Liver | 0–27 adducts/109 parent bases | 0–0.027 | Nair et al. (1995) |
| ϵdA | GC/NCI/MS/SIM | Placental DNA | 2.32 ± 0.02 adducts/106 adenine | 0.70 | Chen et al. (1999) |
| LC/ESI/MS/MS | Placental DNA | 2.48 ± 0.25 ϵA/106 adenine | 0.75 | Chen et al. (1999) | |
| HPLC/fluorescence assay | Placental DNA | 2.77 ± 0.24 ϵA/106 adenine | 0.84 | Chen et al. (1999) | |
| LC/MS | Placental DNA | 1.1 adducts/108 normal bases | 0.011 | Doerge et al. (2000) | |
| Imafin/32P/TLC | Pancreas | 1.8 ± 1.3 adducts/108 nt | 0.018 | Kadlubar et al. (1998) | |
| ϵdC | Imafin/32P/TLC | Pancreas | 1.2 ± 0.92 adducts/108 nt | 0.012 | Kadlubar et al. (1998) |
| N2,3‐ethenoguanine | LC/ESI/MS | Liver | 0.06 ± 0.01 pmol/mg DNA | 0.020 | Yen et al. (1996) |
| HNE‐dG | HPLC/32P/TLC/HPLCa | Liver, colon | 3–9 nmol/mol guanine | 0.0006–0.0018 | Chung (2000) |
| Acrolein‐dG (AdG) | 32P/HPLC | Gingival tissue non‐smokers | 0.46 ± 0.26 µmol/mol guanine | 0.092 | Nath et al. (1998) |
| 32P/HPLC | Gingival tissue smokers | 1.36 ± 0.90 µmol/mol guanine | 0.27 | Nath et al. (1998) | |
| HPLC/32P/TLC/HPLCa | Liver | 0.3–2.0 adducts/106 guanine | 0.06–0.40 | Nath and Chung (1994) | |
| Crotonaldehyde‐dG1 | 32P/HPLC | Gingival tissue non‐smokers | 0.06 ± 0.07 µmol/mol guanine | 0.012 | Nath et al. (1998) |
| 32P/HPLC | Gingival tissue smokers | 0.53 ± 0.44 µmol/mol guanine | 0.11 | Nath et al. (1998) | |
| Crotonaldehyde‐dG2 | 32P/HPLC | Gingival tissue non‐smokers | 0.31 ± 0.40 µmol/mol guanine | 0.062 | Nath et al. (1998) |
| 32P/HPLC | Gingival tissue smokers | 1.72 ± 1.26 µmol/mol guanine | 0.34 | Nath et al. (1998) | |
| Adduct | Method | Tissue | Quantity | Reference | |
| Adducts/106 nt | |||||
| M1G | 32P/reversed phase HPLC | White blood cells | 2.6 ± 1.2 adducts/107 nt | 0.26 | Vaca et al. (1995) |
| Imafin/GC/EC NCI/MS | Leucocytes | 6.2 ± 1.2 adducts/108 bases | 0.062 | Rouzer et al. (1997) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Lung | 1.00 ± 0.40 adducts/107 nt | 0.1 | Yi et al. (1998) | |
| GC/EC NCI/MS | Pancreas | 32 ± 23 adducts/108 nt | 0.32 | Kadlubar et al. (1998) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Pancreas | 3.58 ± 1.46 adducts/107 nt | 0.36 | Yi et al. (1998) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Liver | 1.40 adducts/107 nt | 0.14 | Yi et al. (1998) | |
| GC/EC NCI/MS | Hepatic DNA | 9 adducts/107 bases or 5400 adducts/cell | 0.90 | Chaudhary et al. (1994) | |
| 32P/reversed phase HPLC | Breast tissue | 3.0 ± 1.3 adducts/107 nt | 0.30 | Vaca et al. (1995) | |
| EdA, EdC | Imafin/32P/TLC | Liver | 0–27 adducts/109 parent bases | 0–0.027 | Nair et al. (1995) |
| ϵdA | GC/NCI/MS/SIM | Placental DNA | 2.32 ± 0.02 adducts/106 adenine | 0.70 | Chen et al. (1999) |
| LC/ESI/MS/MS | Placental DNA | 2.48 ± 0.25 ϵA/106 adenine | 0.75 | Chen et al. (1999) | |
| HPLC/fluorescence assay | Placental DNA | 2.77 ± 0.24 ϵA/106 adenine | 0.84 | Chen et al. (1999) | |
| LC/MS | Placental DNA | 1.1 adducts/108 normal bases | 0.011 | Doerge et al. (2000) | |
| Imafin/32P/TLC | Pancreas | 1.8 ± 1.3 adducts/108 nt | 0.018 | Kadlubar et al. (1998) | |
| ϵdC | Imafin/32P/TLC | Pancreas | 1.2 ± 0.92 adducts/108 nt | 0.012 | Kadlubar et al. (1998) |
| N2,3‐ethenoguanine | LC/ESI/MS | Liver | 0.06 ± 0.01 pmol/mg DNA | 0.020 | Yen et al. (1996) |
| HNE‐dG | HPLC/32P/TLC/HPLCa | Liver, colon | 3–9 nmol/mol guanine | 0.0006–0.0018 | Chung (2000) |
| Acrolein‐dG (AdG) | 32P/HPLC | Gingival tissue non‐smokers | 0.46 ± 0.26 µmol/mol guanine | 0.092 | Nath et al. (1998) |
| 32P/HPLC | Gingival tissue smokers | 1.36 ± 0.90 µmol/mol guanine | 0.27 | Nath et al. (1998) | |
| HPLC/32P/TLC/HPLCa | Liver | 0.3–2.0 adducts/106 guanine | 0.06–0.40 | Nath and Chung (1994) | |
| Crotonaldehyde‐dG1 | 32P/HPLC | Gingival tissue non‐smokers | 0.06 ± 0.07 µmol/mol guanine | 0.012 | Nath et al. (1998) |
| 32P/HPLC | Gingival tissue smokers | 0.53 ± 0.44 µmol/mol guanine | 0.11 | Nath et al. (1998) | |
| Crotonaldehyde‐dG2 | 32P/HPLC | Gingival tissue non‐smokers | 0.31 ± 0.40 µmol/mol guanine | 0.062 | Nath et al. (1998) |
| 32P/HPLC | Gingival tissue smokers | 1.72 ± 1.26 µmol/mol guanine | 0.34 | Nath et al. (1998) | |
Molecular weight of DNA 327.6 g/mol; human genome = 3.2 × 109 bp; 19.9% guanine, 30.2% adenine, 19.6% cytosine, 30.3% thymine (Snustad et al., 1997). HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; EC, electrochemical detection; GC/MS, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; SIM, selective ion monitoring; Fpg, formamidopyrimidine glycosylase; 32P, 32P‐post‐labelling. Imafin, immunoaffinity purification; NCI, negative chemical ionization; ESI, electrospray ionization; LC, liquid chromatography; TLC, thin layer chromatography.
a 32P post‐labelling followed by TLC and several HPLC steps.
Adducts as a consequence of DNA alkylation
| Adduct | Method | Tissue | Quantity | Reference | |
| Adducts/106 nt | |||||
| 7‐Methylguanine | 32P/TLC/HPLC | White blood cells | 2.9 adducts/107 nt | 0.29 | Zhao et al. (1999) |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | White blood cells smokers with lung cancer | 3.3 ± 0.9 adducts/107 nt | 0.33 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| 32P/AEC | White blood cells smokers | 6.9 adducts/107 nt | 0.69 | Mustonen and Hemminki (1992) | |
| 32P/AEC | White blood cells non‐smokers | 3.4 adducts/107 nt | 0.34 | Mustonen and Hemminki (1992) | |
| 32P/HPLC | White blood cells non‐smokers | 2.5 adducts/107 nt | 0.25 | Mustonen et al. (1991) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Lymphocytes (age ≤ 50) | 1.0 ± 0.9 adducts/107 nt | 0.10 | Zhao and Hemminki (2002) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Lymphocytes (age ≥ 80) | 0.8 ± 0.4 adducts/107 nt | 0.080 | Zhao and Hemminki (2002) | |
| HPLC/32P | Lymphocytes | 5.0–8.3 adducts/107 dGp | 0.10–0.17 | Kato et al. (1993) | |
| 32P/AEC | Lymphocytes non‐smokers | 2.3 adducts/107 nt | 0.23 | Mustonen et al. (1993) | |
| 32P/AEC | Lymphocytes smokers | 11.5 adducts/107 nt | 1.15 | Mustonen et al. (1993) | |
| 32P/AEC | Lymphocytes smokers | 23.6 adducts/107 nt | 2.36 | Mustonen and Hemminki (1992) | |
| 32P/AEC | Lymphocytes non‐smokers | 13.5 adducts/107 nt | 1.35 | Mustonen and Hemminki (1992) | |
| 32P/AEC | Granulocytes smokers | 4.7 adducts/107 nt | 0.47 | Mustonen and Hemminki (1992) | |
| 32P/AEC | Granulocytes non‐smokers | 2.8 adducts/107 nt | 0.28 | Mustonen and Hemminki (1992) | |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Lung tissue | 4.0 adducts/107 nt | 0.40 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Lung tissue smokers with lung cancer | 6.3 ± 1.9 adducts/107 nt | 0.63 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| HPLC/32P | Lung tissue | 1.4–5.4 adducts/107 dGp | 0.028–0.11 | Kato et al. (1993) | |
| HPLC/32P | Lung tissue smokers | 14–72 adducts/107 nt | 1.40–7.20 | Shields et al. (1990) | |
| HPLC/32Pa | Lung tissue | 2.5 ± 2.3 adducts/107 dGp | 0.05 | Blömeke et al. (1996) | |
| 32P/AEC | Bronchus smokers | 17.3 adducts/107 nt | 1.73 | Mustonen et al. (1993) | |
| 32P/AEC | Bronchus non‐smokers | 4.7 adducts/107 nt | 0.47 | Mustonen et al. (1993) | |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Bronchus smokers with lung cancer | 6.1±1.5 adducts/107 nt | 0.61 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| Imafin/HPLC/EC | Pancreas | 2–7 pmol/µmol guanosine | 0.40–1.39 | Bianchini et al. (1993) | |
| Immunoslot blot | Colon mucosa | 0.33–1.34 µmol/mol dG | 0.066 | Harrison et al. (2001) | |
| Immunoslot blot | Rectal mucosa | 0.30 µmol/mol dG | 0.060 | Harrison et al. (2001) | |
| O6‐methylguanine | PREPIb | Leucocytes | 0.7–4.6 adducts/108 guanine | 0.0014–0.0092 | Kang et al. (1995) |
| PREPIb | Liver | 1.1–6.7 adducts/107 guanine | 0.022–0.13 | Kang et al. (1995) | |
| HPLC/32P | Lung tissue smokers | 1–11 adducts/107 dGp | 0.020–0.22 | Shields et al. (1990) | |
| O4‐methylthymine | PREPIb | Liver | 0.1–14 adducts/107 thymine | 0.003–0.42 | Kang et al. (1995) |
| O4‐ethylthymine | PREPIb | Liver | 0.5–140 adducts/107 thymine | 0.015–4.24 | Kang et al. (1995) |
| 7‐(2‐Hydroxyethyl)guanine | HPLC/fluorescence assay | Blood cells | 2.1–5.8 pmol/mg DNA | 0.69–1.90 | Bolt et al. (1997) |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | White blood cells smokers with lung cancer | 0.6±0.2 adducts/107 nt | 0.06 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| Immunoslot blot | White blood cells | 0.65 adducts/107 nt | 0.065 | Van Delft et al. (1994) | |
| Immunoslot blot | WBC smokers | 0.11 adducts/107 nt | 0.011 | Van Delft et al. (1994) | |
| Immunoslot blot | WBC non‐smokers | 0.095 adducts/107 nt | 0.0095 | Van Delft et al. (1994) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Lymphocytes (age ≤50) | 3.8 ± 3.4 adducts/107 nt | 0.38 | Zhao and Hemminki (2002) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Lymphocytes (age ≥80) | 3.0 ± 2.7 adducts/107 nt | 0.30 | Zhao and Hemminki (2002) | |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Lung samples smokers with lung cancer | 0.8 ± 0.3 adducts/107 nt | 0.08 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Bronchus samples smokers with lung cancer | 1.0 ± 0.8 adducts/107 nt | 0.10 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| 7‐Alkylguanine | 32P/AEC | Leucocytes | 13.1 adducts/107 nt | 1.31 | Szyfter et al. (1996) |
| 32P/AEC | Larynx | 22.7 adducts/107 nt | 2.27 | Szyfter et al. (1996) | |
| 7‐Ethyl‐dGp | HPLC/32P | Lymphocytes | 0.3–1.4 adducts/107 dGp | 0.006–0.028 | Kato et al. (1993) |
| HPLC/32P | Lung | 0.6–3.1 adducts/107 dGp | 0.012–0.062 | Kato et al. (1993) | |
| HPLC/32Pa | Lung | 1.6 ± 1.7 adducts/107 dGp | 0.032 | Blömeke et al. (1996) | |
| 7‐Methylguanine and 7‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐guanine | 32P/TLC/HPLC | White blood cells | 0.7–1.5 adducts/107 nt | 0.07–0.15 | Kumar and Hemminki (1996) |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Lymphocytes non‐smokers | 1.1–8.4 adducts/107 nt | 0.11–0.84 | Kumar and Hemminki (1996) | |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Lymphocytes smokers | 5.6–12 adducts/107 nt | 0.56–1.20 | Kumar and Hemminki (1996) | |
| Adduct | Method | Tissue | Quantity | Reference | |
| Adducts/106 nt | |||||
| 7‐Methylguanine | 32P/TLC/HPLC | White blood cells | 2.9 adducts/107 nt | 0.29 | Zhao et al. (1999) |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | White blood cells smokers with lung cancer | 3.3 ± 0.9 adducts/107 nt | 0.33 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| 32P/AEC | White blood cells smokers | 6.9 adducts/107 nt | 0.69 | Mustonen and Hemminki (1992) | |
| 32P/AEC | White blood cells non‐smokers | 3.4 adducts/107 nt | 0.34 | Mustonen and Hemminki (1992) | |
| 32P/HPLC | White blood cells non‐smokers | 2.5 adducts/107 nt | 0.25 | Mustonen et al. (1991) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Lymphocytes (age ≤ 50) | 1.0 ± 0.9 adducts/107 nt | 0.10 | Zhao and Hemminki (2002) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Lymphocytes (age ≥ 80) | 0.8 ± 0.4 adducts/107 nt | 0.080 | Zhao and Hemminki (2002) | |
| HPLC/32P | Lymphocytes | 5.0–8.3 adducts/107 dGp | 0.10–0.17 | Kato et al. (1993) | |
| 32P/AEC | Lymphocytes non‐smokers | 2.3 adducts/107 nt | 0.23 | Mustonen et al. (1993) | |
| 32P/AEC | Lymphocytes smokers | 11.5 adducts/107 nt | 1.15 | Mustonen et al. (1993) | |
| 32P/AEC | Lymphocytes smokers | 23.6 adducts/107 nt | 2.36 | Mustonen and Hemminki (1992) | |
| 32P/AEC | Lymphocytes non‐smokers | 13.5 adducts/107 nt | 1.35 | Mustonen and Hemminki (1992) | |
| 32P/AEC | Granulocytes smokers | 4.7 adducts/107 nt | 0.47 | Mustonen and Hemminki (1992) | |
| 32P/AEC | Granulocytes non‐smokers | 2.8 adducts/107 nt | 0.28 | Mustonen and Hemminki (1992) | |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Lung tissue | 4.0 adducts/107 nt | 0.40 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Lung tissue smokers with lung cancer | 6.3 ± 1.9 adducts/107 nt | 0.63 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| HPLC/32P | Lung tissue | 1.4–5.4 adducts/107 dGp | 0.028–0.11 | Kato et al. (1993) | |
| HPLC/32P | Lung tissue smokers | 14–72 adducts/107 nt | 1.40–7.20 | Shields et al. (1990) | |
| HPLC/32Pa | Lung tissue | 2.5 ± 2.3 adducts/107 dGp | 0.05 | Blömeke et al. (1996) | |
| 32P/AEC | Bronchus smokers | 17.3 adducts/107 nt | 1.73 | Mustonen et al. (1993) | |
| 32P/AEC | Bronchus non‐smokers | 4.7 adducts/107 nt | 0.47 | Mustonen et al. (1993) | |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Bronchus smokers with lung cancer | 6.1±1.5 adducts/107 nt | 0.61 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| Imafin/HPLC/EC | Pancreas | 2–7 pmol/µmol guanosine | 0.40–1.39 | Bianchini et al. (1993) | |
| Immunoslot blot | Colon mucosa | 0.33–1.34 µmol/mol dG | 0.066 | Harrison et al. (2001) | |
| Immunoslot blot | Rectal mucosa | 0.30 µmol/mol dG | 0.060 | Harrison et al. (2001) | |
| O6‐methylguanine | PREPIb | Leucocytes | 0.7–4.6 adducts/108 guanine | 0.0014–0.0092 | Kang et al. (1995) |
| PREPIb | Liver | 1.1–6.7 adducts/107 guanine | 0.022–0.13 | Kang et al. (1995) | |
| HPLC/32P | Lung tissue smokers | 1–11 adducts/107 dGp | 0.020–0.22 | Shields et al. (1990) | |
| O4‐methylthymine | PREPIb | Liver | 0.1–14 adducts/107 thymine | 0.003–0.42 | Kang et al. (1995) |
| O4‐ethylthymine | PREPIb | Liver | 0.5–140 adducts/107 thymine | 0.015–4.24 | Kang et al. (1995) |
| 7‐(2‐Hydroxyethyl)guanine | HPLC/fluorescence assay | Blood cells | 2.1–5.8 pmol/mg DNA | 0.69–1.90 | Bolt et al. (1997) |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | White blood cells smokers with lung cancer | 0.6±0.2 adducts/107 nt | 0.06 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| Immunoslot blot | White blood cells | 0.65 adducts/107 nt | 0.065 | Van Delft et al. (1994) | |
| Immunoslot blot | WBC smokers | 0.11 adducts/107 nt | 0.011 | Van Delft et al. (1994) | |
| Immunoslot blot | WBC non‐smokers | 0.095 adducts/107 nt | 0.0095 | Van Delft et al. (1994) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Lymphocytes (age ≤50) | 3.8 ± 3.4 adducts/107 nt | 0.38 | Zhao and Hemminki (2002) | |
| 32P/HPLC | Lymphocytes (age ≥80) | 3.0 ± 2.7 adducts/107 nt | 0.30 | Zhao and Hemminki (2002) | |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Lung samples smokers with lung cancer | 0.8 ± 0.3 adducts/107 nt | 0.08 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Bronchus samples smokers with lung cancer | 1.0 ± 0.8 adducts/107 nt | 0.10 | Zhao et al. (1999) | |
| 7‐Alkylguanine | 32P/AEC | Leucocytes | 13.1 adducts/107 nt | 1.31 | Szyfter et al. (1996) |
| 32P/AEC | Larynx | 22.7 adducts/107 nt | 2.27 | Szyfter et al. (1996) | |
| 7‐Ethyl‐dGp | HPLC/32P | Lymphocytes | 0.3–1.4 adducts/107 dGp | 0.006–0.028 | Kato et al. (1993) |
| HPLC/32P | Lung | 0.6–3.1 adducts/107 dGp | 0.012–0.062 | Kato et al. (1993) | |
| HPLC/32Pa | Lung | 1.6 ± 1.7 adducts/107 dGp | 0.032 | Blömeke et al. (1996) | |
| 7‐Methylguanine and 7‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐guanine | 32P/TLC/HPLC | White blood cells | 0.7–1.5 adducts/107 nt | 0.07–0.15 | Kumar and Hemminki (1996) |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Lymphocytes non‐smokers | 1.1–8.4 adducts/107 nt | 0.11–0.84 | Kumar and Hemminki (1996) | |
| 32P/TLC/HPLC | Lymphocytes smokers | 5.6–12 adducts/107 nt | 0.56–1.20 | Kumar and Hemminki (1996) | |
Molecular weight of DNA 327.6 g/mol; human genome = 3.2 × 109 bp; 19.9% guanine, 30.2% adenine, 19.6% cytosine, 30.3% thymine (Snustad et al., 1997). HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; EC, electrochemical detection; GC/MS, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; SIM, selective ion monitoring; Fpg, formamidopyrimidine glycosylase; 32P, 32P‐post‐labelling. Imafin, immunoaffinity purification; NCI, negative chemical ionization; ESI, electrospray ionization; LC, liquid chromatography; TLC, thin layer chromatography; AEC, anion exchange chromatography.
aAdducts were isolated through two sequential HPLC steps.
b32P‐post‐labelling, followed by HPLC and immunoprecipitation.
Abasic sites
| Adduct | Method | Tissue | Quantity | Reference | |
| AP sites/106 nt | |||||
| Abasic site | Radioactive labelling of purines | Cells | 2000–10 000 lesions/cell generation | 0.31–1.56 per day | Lindahl and Nyberg (1972) |
| ASBa | Liver | 8–9 lesions/106 nt, 50 000–200 000 lesions/cell | 8–9 | Nakamura and Swenberg (1999) | |
| ARP/ELISA | Cultured cells, leucocytes | <0.67 lesions/106 nt or 4000 lesions/genome | < 0.67 | Atamna et al. (2000) | |
| Adduct | Method | Tissue | Quantity | Reference | |
| AP sites/106 nt | |||||
| Abasic site | Radioactive labelling of purines | Cells | 2000–10 000 lesions/cell generation | 0.31–1.56 per day | Lindahl and Nyberg (1972) |
| ASBa | Liver | 8–9 lesions/106 nt, 50 000–200 000 lesions/cell | 8–9 | Nakamura and Swenberg (1999) | |
| ARP/ELISA | Cultured cells, leucocytes | <0.67 lesions/106 nt or 4000 lesions/genome | < 0.67 | Atamna et al. (2000) | |
Molecular weight of DNA 327.6 g/mol; human genome = 3.2 × 109 bp; 19.9% guanine, 30.2% adenine, 19.6% cytosine, 30.3% thymine (Snustad et al., 1997). ARP, biotin‐containing aldehyde‐reactive probe; ELISA, enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay.
aA combination of an ARP and slot blot techniques.
Mutation patterns of endogenous DNA lesions
| Lesion | Mutation | Reference |
| Apurinic sites | AT→TA | Lindahl (1996); Jackson and Loeb (2001) |
| GC→TA | ||
| APsite→T | Gentil et al. (1990); Lawrence et al. (1990) | |
| Frameshift mutations | Jackson et al. (1998) | |
| Cytosine deamination | CG→TA | Lindahl (1996) |
| 5‐Methylcytosine deamination | 5MeCG→TA | Lindahl (1996); Jackson and Loeb (2001) |
| 8‐Oxo‐G | GC→TA | Lindahl (1996); Wagner et al. (1992) |
| Thymine glycol | C→T transition | Marnett and Plastaras (2001) |
| O6‐methylguanine | GC→AT | Lindahl (1996) |
| O4‐methylguanine | TA→CG | Lindahl (1996) |
| FapyGua | GC→CG transversion | Ono et al. (1995) |
| 5‐OH‐Cyt | CG→AT transition, GC→CG transversion | Purmal et al. (1994) |
| 5‐OH‐Ura | CG→AT transition, GC→CG transversion | Purmal et al. (1994) |
| 1,N2‐(1,3‐propano)‐2′‐deoxyguanosine | G→T transversion | Moriya et al. (1994) |
| ϵdC | CG→AT transversion | Palejwala et al. (1993); Moriya et al. (1994); Pandya and Moriya (1996) |
| CG→TA transition | Moriya et al. (1994); Pandya and Moriya (1996) | |
| N2,3‐ϵdG | GC→AT transition | Cheng et al. (1991) |
| 1,N2‐ϵdG | GC→TA transversion | Langouët et al. (1997) |
| GC→CG transversion | ||
| ϵdA | AT→GC transition | Basu et al. (1993); Pandya and Moriya (1996) |
| AT→TA transversion | Pandya and Moriya (1996) | |
| AT→CG transversion | ||
| M1G | G→T transversion | Marnett (1999) |
| C→T transition | ||
| A→G transition | ||
| Frameshift mutations | ||
| M1G→A | Fink et al. (1997) | |
| M1G→T | ||
| M1G→C |
| Lesion | Mutation | Reference |
| Apurinic sites | AT→TA | Lindahl (1996); Jackson and Loeb (2001) |
| GC→TA | ||
| APsite→T | Gentil et al. (1990); Lawrence et al. (1990) | |
| Frameshift mutations | Jackson et al. (1998) | |
| Cytosine deamination | CG→TA | Lindahl (1996) |
| 5‐Methylcytosine deamination | 5MeCG→TA | Lindahl (1996); Jackson and Loeb (2001) |
| 8‐Oxo‐G | GC→TA | Lindahl (1996); Wagner et al. (1992) |
| Thymine glycol | C→T transition | Marnett and Plastaras (2001) |
| O6‐methylguanine | GC→AT | Lindahl (1996) |
| O4‐methylguanine | TA→CG | Lindahl (1996) |
| FapyGua | GC→CG transversion | Ono et al. (1995) |
| 5‐OH‐Cyt | CG→AT transition, GC→CG transversion | Purmal et al. (1994) |
| 5‐OH‐Ura | CG→AT transition, GC→CG transversion | Purmal et al. (1994) |
| 1,N2‐(1,3‐propano)‐2′‐deoxyguanosine | G→T transversion | Moriya et al. (1994) |
| ϵdC | CG→AT transversion | Palejwala et al. (1993); Moriya et al. (1994); Pandya and Moriya (1996) |
| CG→TA transition | Moriya et al. (1994); Pandya and Moriya (1996) | |
| N2,3‐ϵdG | GC→AT transition | Cheng et al. (1991) |
| 1,N2‐ϵdG | GC→TA transversion | Langouët et al. (1997) |
| GC→CG transversion | ||
| ϵdA | AT→GC transition | Basu et al. (1993); Pandya and Moriya (1996) |
| AT→TA transversion | Pandya and Moriya (1996) | |
| AT→CG transversion | ||
| M1G | G→T transversion | Marnett (1999) |
| C→T transition | ||
| A→G transition | ||
| Frameshift mutations | ||
| M1G→A | Fink et al. (1997) | |
| M1G→T | ||
| M1G→C |







