85. Evaluation of Urinalysis and Urine Culture Use at a Community Health-system

Abstract Background The Infectious Diseases Society of America asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) guidelines recommend against screening for or treating ASB in most patients without symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI). The purpose of this study was to characterize current urine testing practices and their potential impact on identification and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria on hospitalized adults. Methods This retrospective, point prevalence study conducted at a 4 hospital community health-system that included all inpatients ≥ 18 years old present on November 13th, 2019. Patients were excluded if they were admitted or transferred to either a labor & delivery or mother-baby unit. A chart review was performed for a sub-group of patients with abnormal urine testing, with a target sample size of 200 (n=50 from each hospital). The primary outcome was the prevalence of patients with a urinalysis, urine culture, or both performed during their admission. Secondary outcomes included abnormal urine testing in the overall cohort and symptomatology and antibiotic use in the sub-group (Figure 1). Results 947 patients met inclusion criteria. Of those patients, 516 (54%) had urine testing performed during their admission. 322 (34%) patients had abnormal urine testing results (Table 1). In the sub-group, 192 patients with abnormal urine tests were included. Antibiotics with a documented indication of UTI were administered to 66 (34%) patients. Of those given antibiotics with a UTI indication, 49/66 (74%) did not have documented signs or symptoms of a UTI (Figure 2). Conclusion Urine testing was performed on the majority of admitted adult patients. Unnecessary testing likely contributes to guideline discordant screening and treatment of ASB. Future studies are needed to identify effective diagnostic stewardship interventions to decrease screening and treatment of ASB. Disclosures Ashley Wilde, PharmD, BCPS-AQ ID, Nothing to disclose


A Survey Based Assessment of Provider Practice Around Obtaining Repeat Blood Cultures
Sujeet Govindan, MD 1 ; Luke Strnad, MD 1 ; 1 Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon Session: P-05. Antimicrobial Stewardship: Diagnostics/Diagnostic Stewardship Background. Apart from Staphylococcus aureus and Candida species, there is little guidance on whether to obtain repeat blood cultures after an initial positive set. We have noted heterogeneity in practice amongst our Infectious Disease (ID) group at Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) and suspect there is heterogeneity amongst adult hospitalist providers as well.
Methods. We created a survey using clinical vignettes encompassing commonly encountered scenarios among hospitalized patients on medical wards to assess provider practices in obtaining repeat blood cultures. The survey was sent to adult ID providers and adult hospitalist providers at OHSU. These vignettes represented 9 of the most common bacteria seen in positive blood cultures and asked the question of whether providers would obtain repeat blood cultures after an initial positive set. The organisms included beta hemolytic streptococcus, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus gallolyticus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, alpha hemolytic strep, E coli, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacteroides fragilis. We then asked questions around repeat blood culture practices for Staphylococcus aureus and Candida species, understanding that while repeat blood cultures for these organisms is recommended, the manner in which individual providers implement this may vary.
Results. The survey response rate was ~45%. Results were heterogenous with only 3 questions having inter-and intra-group agreement. Those 3 questions represented a case of E faecalis bacteremia without known source, a case of asymptomatic Staphylococcus epidermidis blood culture positivity, and a case of E. coli bacteremia from a pyelonephritis. All other vignettes had inter-and intra-group differences signifying clinical uncertainty around the practice of obtaining repeat blood cultures. There was similar heterogeneity among the responses asking how providers obtain repeat blood cultures around S. aureus and Candida bloodstream infections.
Clinical vignette survey answers Answers from 10 clinical vignettes on obtaining repeat blood cultures after an initial positive set for stable patients on medical wards.

Candida sp
Conclusion. There is significant heterogeneity amongst adult ID and hospitalist providers on what organisms and situations should prompt repeat blood cultures. There are differences around how repeat blood cultures should be obtained, including for Staphylococcus aureus and Candida sp. Background. The Infectious Diseases Society of America asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) guidelines recommend against screening for or treating ASB in most patients without symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI). The purpose of this study was to characterize current urine testing practices and their potential impact on identification and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria on hospitalized adults.

Evaluation of Urinalysis and Urine Culture Use at a Community Health-system
Methods. This retrospective, point prevalence study conducted at a 4 hospital community health-system that included all inpatients ≥ 18 years old present on November 13 th , 2019. Patients were excluded if they were admitted or transferred to either a labor & delivery or mother-baby unit. A chart review was performed for a sub-group of patients with abnormal urine testing, with a target sample size of 200 (n=50 from each hospital). The primary outcome was the prevalence of patients with a urinalysis, urine culture, or both performed during their admission. Secondary outcomes included abnormal urine testing in the overall cohort and symptomatology and antibiotic use in the sub-group (Figure 1).

Results
. 947 patients met inclusion criteria. Of those patients, 516 (54%) had urine testing performed during their admission. 322 (34%) patients had abnormal urine testing results (Table 1). In the sub-group, 192 patients with abnormal urine tests were included. Antibiotics with a documented indication of UTI were administered to