258. D-Dimer, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and C-Reactive Protein Sensitivity for PJI Diagnosis

Abstract Background Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of acute PJI now include D-dimer. Additionally, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) is of questionable use in the diagnosis of acute PJI. There is scarce and contradicting evidence on the diagnostic value for these biomarkers, and further studies on larger cohorts are needed for validation. We sought to quantify the sensitivities of D-dimer and ESR compared to C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in the diagnosis of acute PJI at a tertiary referral center. Sensitivity Table for D-Dimer and ESR Methods An institutional database was queried for patients undergoing revision procedures for PJI after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from 2014 to present. Patients were included if they had a PJI diagnosis code with subsequent revision procedure CPT codes and PICC line placement within 21 days of revision surgery. Patients with inflammatory arthropathies were excluded. Diagnostic labs, including CRP, ESR, and D-dimer, were collected within 90 days pre- and post-operatively and sensitivities for the diagnosis of PJI were calculated. Cutoff values included CRP >1 mg/dL, ESR >30 mm/hr and >50 mm/hr, and D-dimer >860 ng/mL. Results In total, 961 PJI patients were identified. Of those, 904 had ESR and CRP values collected, and 123 had ESR, CRP, and D-dimer collected. In the cohort of patients with ESR and CRP, 603 patients had elevated CRP, 554 had ESR >30 mm/hr, and 379 had ESR >50 mm/hr, corresponding to sensitivities of 66.7%, 61.3%, and 41.9%, respectively. In the cohort of patients with all three biomarkers, 113 had an elevated D-dimer, corresponding to a sensitivity of 91.9%. Conclusion In this cohort, CRP and ESR were of comparable sensitivity in diagnosing PJI. D-dimer was the most sensitive, but further pooled studies are needed to confirm this. Providers should continue to use this information in the context of other data and MSIS criteria to inform decision-making. Disclosures Thorsten Seyler, MD/PhD, Depuy Synthes (Other Financial or Material Support, Resident Educational Support)Extrel Therapeutics (Board Member, Shareholder)Heraeus Medical (Consultant)MiCare Path (Board Member, Shareholder)OREF (Grant/Research Support)Pattern health (Board Member)Restor3D (Other Financial or Material Support, Royalties)Smith+Nephew, Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Stryker (Other Financial or Material Support, Resident Educational Support)Total Joint Orthopedics, Inc. (Consultant)Wolters Kluwer Health (Other Financial or Material Support, Royalties)Zimmer Biomet (Grant/Research Support) William Jiranek, MD, Depuy Synthes (Other Financial or Material Support, Royalty/Licensing)


Session: P-12. Bone and Joint
Background. There is a paucity of data in the literature regarding the most effective treatment and related outcomes of fungal prosthetic joint infection. The majority of reported cases are treated using a two stage revision method in which the initial prosthesis is removed and the patient is treated with systemic antifungal medications and potentially irrigation of the joint cavity with antifungal and antibacterial agents. Alternately, others have suggested a one-stage revision in order to prevent a period of significant functional impairment and potentially improved functional outcomes and lower overall costs. Cases of radical removal of the prosthesis without replacement have been reported. To date, the largest studies of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty have included 37 and 45 patients, respectively.
Methods. A retrospective record review of patients admitted within two health systems between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2018 with prosthetic joints and a deep culture of the joint positive for fungal organisms was performed.
Results. Eighteen patients fit criteria. Nine patients had knee replacements and nine patients had hip replacements. The average age at time of infection was 61. Ten patients were female. Average BMI was 32.1. Twelve presented with a painful joint, eight presented with drainage, and one with dehiscence. Average WBC count was 9.3, average ESR was 47, and average CRP was 11.8. All patients were noted with Candida species. Eight patients were treated with two stage revisions, three received one stage revisions as destination therapy. One required amputation. All but one patient was associated with concurrent bacterial infection. Of the twelve patients that had known outcomes, six were noted with cure and six were noted with relapse. All patients that were cured received two stage exchange or girdlestone procedure.
Conclusion. In our study, fungal prosthetic joint infection was associated with poor outcomes. All of the patients in our study were noted with Candida species, which is in concordance with the known literature. Two stage exchange was associated with better outcomes.
Disclosures. Background. Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of acute PJI now include D-dimer. Additionally, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) is of questionable use in the diagnosis of acute PJI. There is scarce and contradicting evidence on the diagnostic value for these biomarkers, and further studies on larger cohorts are needed for validation. We sought to quantify the sensitivities of D-dimer and ESR compared to C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in the diagnosis of acute PJI at a tertiary referral center.

Sensitivity Table for D-Dimer and ESR
Methods. An institutional database was queried for patients undergoing revision procedures for PJI after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from 2014 to present. Patients were included if they had a PJI diagnosis code with subsequent revision procedure CPT codes and PICC line placement within 21 days of revision surgery. Patients with inflammatory arthropathies were excluded. Diagnostic labs, including CRP, ESR, and D-dimer, were collected within 90 days pre-and post-operatively and sensitivities for the diagnosis of PJI were calculated. Cutoff values included CRP >1 mg/dL, ESR >30 mm/hr and >50 mm/hr, and D-dimer >860 ng/mL.
Results. In total, 961 PJI patients were identified. Of those, 904 had ESR and CRP values collected, and 123 had ESR, CRP, and D-dimer collected. In the cohort of patients with ESR and CRP, 603 patients had elevated CRP, 554 had ESR >30 mm/ hr, and 379 had ESR >50 mm/hr, corresponding to sensitivities of 66.7%, 61.3%, and 41.9%, respectively. In the cohort of patients with all three biomarkers, 113 had an elevated D-dimer, corresponding to a sensitivity of 91.9%.
Conclusion. In this cohort, CRP and ESR were of comparable sensitivity in diagnosing PJI. D-dimer was the most sensitive, but further pooled studies are needed to confirm this. Providers should continue to use this information in the context of other data and MSIS criteria to inform decision-making.
Disclosures Background. The majority of adults and children with meningitis and encephalitis have unknown etiologies fostering universal admission, prolonged length of stay, empirical antibiotic and antiviral therapies. A qualitative multiplexed nucleic acidbased in vitro diagnostic test (FilmArray) is helping clinicians identify organisms and improve clinical outcomes.
Methods. Patients presenting between July 5, 2018, to April 26, 2021, with meningitis or encephalitis, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with WBC >5 cells/mm 3, and leftover CSF were available for testing. All CSF specimens underwent testing with the Biofire® Film Array Meningitis Encephalitis (FAME) panel. This multiplex PCR tool utilizes 0.2 ml CSF sample to identify the presence of 14 viral, bacterial and fungal pathogens in 1 hour.