418. Low Frequency of Healthcare Worker Infections Following Occupational Exposures to COVID-19

Abstract Background Data on occupational acquisition of COVID-19 in healthcare settings are limited. Contact tracing efforts are high resource investments. Methods Duke Health developed robust COVID-19 contact tracing methods as part of a comprehensive prevention program. We prospectively collected data on HCW exposures and monitored for development of symptomatic (SYX) and asymptomatic (ASYX) COVID-19 infection after documented high-, medium, and low-risk exposures. HCWs were required to self-report exposures or were identified through contact tracing as potentially exposed to COVID-19 positive HCWs, patients or visitors. Contact tracers interviewed exposed HCWs and assessed the risk of exposure as high-, medium-, or low-risk based on CDC guidance (Table 1). Testing was recommended at 6 days after high- or medium-risk exposures and was provided upon HCW request following low-risk exposures. Our vaccination campaign began in 12/2020. Results 12,916 HCWs registered in the contact tracing database. From March 2020-May 2021, we identified 6,606 occupational exposures (0.51 exposures/HCW). The highest incidence of workplace exposures per number of HCWs in each job category was among respiratory therapists (RT) (0.95 exposures/RT), nursing assistants (NA) (0.79 exposures/NA), and physicians (0.64 exposures/physician). The most common exposure risk level was medium (51.4%), followed by low (35.5%), and then high (13.1%). A total of 260 (2%) HCW had positive tests/conversions; 28 (10.8%) were ASYX at the time of testing. High-risk exposures had a significantly greater number of post-exposure infections compared to medium- and low-risk exposures (12.5% vs. 4.2%, vs. 0.4%; p < 0.001). The rate of SYX infection following exposure to a fellow HCW (179/3,198; 5.6%) was higher than that following exposure to a patient (81/3,408; 2.4%; p< 0.001). Conclusion Conversion following exposure to COVID-19 in the healthcare setting with appropriate protective equipment was low. Incomplete testing of all exposed individuals was a limitation and our data may under-estimate the true conversion rate. Our findings support our local practice of not quarantining HCWs following non-household exposures. Limiting contact tracing to only high or medium risk exposures may best utilize limited personnel resources. Disclosures Rebekah W. Moehring, MD, MPH, UpToDate, Inc. (Other Financial or Material Support, Author Royalties)

Background. Data on occupational acquisition of COVID-19 in healthcare settings are limited. Contact tracing efforts are high resource investments.
Methods. Duke Health developed robust COVID-19 contact tracing methods as part of a comprehensive prevention program. We prospectively collected data on HCW exposures and monitored for development of symptomatic (SYX) and asymptomatic (ASYX) COVID-19 infection after documented high-, medium, and low-risk exposures. HCWs were required to self-report exposures or were identified through contact tracing as potentially exposed to COVID-19 positive HCWs, patients or visitors. Contact tracers interviewed exposed HCWs and assessed the risk of exposure as high-, medium-, or low-risk based on CDC guidance (Table 1). Testing was recommended at 6 days after high-or medium-risk exposures and was provided upon HCW request following low-risk exposures. Our vaccination campaign began in 12/2020.
Conclusion. Conversion following exposure to COVID-19 in the healthcare setting with appropriate protective equipment was low. Incomplete testing of all exposed individuals was a limitation and our data may under-estimate the true conversion rate. Our findings support our local practice of not quarantining HCWs following non-household exposures. Limiting contact tracing to only high or medium risk exposures may best utilize limited personnel resources.
Disclosures Background. There are limited data regarding SARS-CoV-2 (SC2) environmental contamination in staff areas of healthcare settings. We performed environmental sampling of staff areas in wards where coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) patients received care and compared findings to surfaces within COVID-19 patient rooms.
Methods. The study was conducted at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA) from 9/15/20-1/26/21. Sampling of 20cm 2 surfaces in staff common areas (breakroom high-touch surfaces comprising tables and microwave/refrigerator handles; bathroom surfaces comprising toilet, sink, and doorknob; and floors), nurse workstations (computer mice and floors), and COVID-19 patient rooms (high-touch surfaces comprising bedrail, computer mice/ keyboards, and doorknobs; bathroom surfaces; and floors) was performed using flocked swabs one or more times per week. Specimens underwent RNA extraction and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction to detect the SC2 N1 region. Median comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Trends in odds were evaluated using Score test.

Conclusion.
A low prevalence of detectable SC2 RNA was observed among staff area high-touch surfaces; however, the likelihood of detection increased over time. Environmental SC2 RNA detection may reflect primary contamination from infected healthcare workers or secondary contamination from contact with infected patients, though a direct relationship between surface SC2 RNA viral detection and transmission risk has not been established. Disclosures