1042. Safety of Investigational Microbiota-Based Live Biotherapeutic RBX2660 in Individuals with Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Data from Five Prospective Clinical Studies

Abstract Background Microbiota-based treatments have shown promise to reduce recurrence, morbidity, and mortality for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (rCDI), but consistent and reliable safety data are needed to support regulatory approvals and broaden patient access. Here we provide cumulative safety data from 5 prospective clinical studies evaluating RBX2660—a standardized, microbiota-based investigational live biotherapeutic—for reducing rCDI. Methods This analysis included three Phase 2 (PUNCH CD, PUNCH CD2, PUNCH CD Open Label) and two Phase 3 trials (PUNCH CD3, PUNCH CD3-OLS ad hoc analysis). Participants were ≥18 years old with documented rCDI who completed standard-of-care oral antibiotic therapy prior to treatment with RBX2660. PUNCH CD3-OLS allowed participants with comorbidities of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Depending on the trial, assigned study treatment was 1 or 2 doses of RBX2660 (or placebo), administered rectally. Participants whose CDI recurred within 8 weeks were eligible for additional RBX2660 treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded for at least 6 months following last study treatment; CD2 and CD Open Label recorded TEAEs for 24 months. Results Among 620 participants who received at least one RBX2660 dose (assigned treatment or after recurrence), 324 (52.3%) received 1, 270 (43.5%) received 2, 14 (2.3%) received 3, and 12 (1.9%) received 4. 83 participants received blinded placebo only. A total of 1980 TEAEs were reported from 432 (69.7%) RBX2660-treated participants, compared to 174 TEAEs in 50 (60.2%) placebo-only treated participants. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity, with diarrhea common in all treatment groups. No potentially life-threatening TEAEs were considered related to RBX2660. Study discontinuation due to TEAEs was minimal (< 1%) with none related to RBX2660. There were no reported infections for which the causative pathogen was traced to RBX2660. Conclusion Across five clinical studies with consistent investigational product, RBX2660 was well-tolerated in rCDI participants. In aggregate, this data provides compelling and consistent safety data for RBX2660. Disclosures Tricia Braun, PharmD, Rebiotix, a Ferring Company (Employee) Beth Guthmueller, AS, Rebiotix Inc, A Ferring Company (Employee) Adam J. Harvey, PhD, Rebiotix, A Ferring Company (Employee)

. S J Ryan Arends, PhD, AbbVie (formerly Allergan) (Research Grant or Support)GlaxoSmithKline, LLC (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, LLC (Research Grant or Support)Nabriva Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support)Spero Therapeutics (Research Grant or Support) Abby L. Klauer, n/a, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support) Background. Microbiota-based treatments have shown promise to reduce recurrence, morbidity, and mortality for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (rCDI), but consistent and reliable safety data are needed to support regulatory approvals and broaden patient access. Here we provide cumulative safety data from 5 prospective clinical studies evaluating RBX2660-a standardized, microbiota-based investigational live biotherapeutic-for reducing rCDI.
Methods. This analysis included three Phase 2 (PUNCH CD, PUNCH CD2, PUNCH CD Open Label) and two Phase 3 trials (PUNCH CD3, PUNCH CD3-OLS ad hoc analysis). Participants were ≥18 years old with documented rCDI who completed standard-of-care oral antibiotic therapy prior to treatment with RBX2660. PUNCH CD3-OLS allowed participants with comorbidities of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Depending on the trial, assigned study treatment was 1 or 2 doses of RBX2660 (or placebo), administered rectally. Participants whose CDI recurred within 8 weeks were eligible for additional RBX2660 treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded for at least 6 months following last study treatment; CD2 and CD Open Label recorded TEAEs for 24 months.
Conclusion. Across five clinical studies with consistent investigational product, RBX2660 was well-tolerated in rCDI participants. In aggregate, this data provides compelling and consistent safety data for RBX2660.

Session: P-59. New Drug Development
Background. Mecillinam is a β-lactam antibiotic that exerts its antibacterial activity by binding to penicillin-binding protein 2. In the USA, intravenous (IV) mecillinam is in development for the treatment of complicated UTIs in the hospital setting and as step-down therapy transitioning from IV mecillinam to oral pivmecillinam so that patients can continue treatment at home. To support the clinical development of mecillinam in the USA for the treatment of both complicated and uncomplicated UTI, this observational study investigated the activity of mecillinam against Enterobacterales isolates from patients with UTI in the USA, collected during 2019.
Methods. This study evaluated the activity of mecillinam and other antimicrobial agents against 1075 selected Enterobacterales clinical isolates collected from patients with UTI in the USA during 2019. Antibiotic activity (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]) was determined by Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) agar dilution methodology, and susceptibility was interpreted according to CLSI guidelines.
Results. Among the selected 1075 isolates, producers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) represented 9.6% of Escherichia coli and 50% of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Ninety-five percent of the isolates tested were susceptible to mecillinam ( Table  1). The MIC 50 and MIC 90 values for mecillinam were 0.25 and 2 µg/mL, respectively. Fosfomycin MIC 50 and MIC 90 were 1 and 32 µg/mL, respectively (97.6% of isolates