1379. Vaccination Rates among Liver Transplant Recipients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Newark, NJ

Abstract Background Transplant candidates and recipients are at increased risk of infectious complications of vaccine-preventable diseases due to their longstanding immunosuppressive regimens. We assessed the rates of vaccination in our liver transplant patients at University Hospital (UH) in Newark, NJ. Methods Retrospective chart-review including patients > 18 years old who underwent liver transplantation at UH for a 3-year period from 01/01/2017 to 07/20/2020. Data collected included demographics, clinical outcomes, eligibility and receipt of vaccinations before and after transplantation, protection titers after administration of hepatitis vaccinations and presence of an ID outpatient consultation. We looked at the following receipt of vaccinations: Prevnar-13, Pneumovax-23, Influenza, TDaP, Shingrix, Varivax, Havrix and Engerix/Heplisav. Characteristics of study participants was analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-Square/Fisher’s Exact tests were used to test associations. Results 119 unique medical charts were reviewed and no patients were excluded. Of those patients who were eligible to receive Hepatitis A vaccination, only 44.8% were documented to receive vaccination and of those eligible to receive Hepatitis B vaccination, only 47.8% received it. Influenza vaccination pre-transplantation was 46% and 66.1% in post-transplant recipients. For the other vaccinations, during the pre-transplant period, 17.6 % of patients received Prevnar-13, 36.1% Pneumovax-23 and 20.2% TDaP and 26.1% received Shingrix. Patients who had ID consultation were significantly more likely to receive appropriate Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B vaccinations (p values 0.026 and 0.005). Conclusion We are not meeting national vaccination standards set by the American Society of Transplantation (AST) for optimal vaccination in this population. Our study can inform of possible solutions to increase vaccination rates in this population such as the simple addition of a smartphrase within EMR notes to remind providers to order appropriate vaccinations and eventually, a more long term solution of creation of a dedicated vaccination clinic and/or routine ID pre-transplant evaluations for all transplant candidates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Disclosures Background. Transplant candidates and recipients are at increased risk of infectious complications of vaccine-preventable diseases due to their longstanding immunosuppressive regimens. We assessed the rates of vaccination in our liver transplant patients at University Hospital (UH) in Newark, NJ.
Methods. Retrospective chart-review including patients > 18 years old who underwent liver transplantation at UH for a 3-year period from 01/01/2017 to 07/20/2020. Data collected included demographics, clinical outcomes, eligibility and receipt of vaccinations before and after transplantation, protection titers after administration of hepatitis vaccinations and presence of an ID outpatient consultation. We looked at the following receipt of vaccinations: Prevnar-13, Pneumovax-23, Influenza, TDaP, Shingrix, Varivax, Havrix and Engerix/Heplisav. Characteristics of study participants was analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-Square/Fisher's Exact tests were used to test associations.
Results. 119 unique medical charts were reviewed and no patients were excluded. Of those patients who were eligible to receive Hepatitis A vaccination, only 44.8% were documented to receive vaccination and of those eligible to receive Hepatitis B vaccination, only 47.8% received it. Influenza vaccination pre-transplantation was 46% and 66.1% in post-transplant recipients. For the other vaccinations, during the pre-transplant period, 17.6 % of patients received Prevnar-13, 36.1% Pneumovax-23 and 20.2% TDaP and 26.1% received Shingrix. Patients who had ID consultation were significantly more likely to receive appropriate Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B vaccinations (p values 0.026 and 0.005).

Conclusion.
We are not meeting national vaccination standards set by the American Society of Transplantation (AST) for optimal vaccination in this population. Our study can inform of possible solutions to increase vaccination rates in this population such as the simple addition of a smartphrase within EMR notes to remind providers to order appropriate vaccinations and eventually, a more long term solution of creation of a dedicated vaccination clinic and/or routine ID pre-transplant evaluations for all transplant candidates.
Conclusion. Universal VGC Px in D+/R-KTR remains challenging and requires significant resources for monitoring and intervention for neutropenia, including MD involvement and ID referral. Intermittent/premature stop of VGC may have led to VGC-resistant CMV,and stop of MMF may have led to a trend of higher cellular rejection at 1 yr. There is critical need for new CMV agents with a better safety profile.
Disclosures Background. Length of stay is not only an indicator of how successful a hospitalized patient's treatment and recovery is, but is also an indicator of fiscal costs to the hospital. Hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) patients typically experience extended hospital admissions that can vary significantly patient to patient with hospital discharge dependent upon a recovered white blood cell count. Recent literature suggests a gut microbial influence on hematopoiesis. We sought to explore potential associations between gut microbiome diversity and the length of stay in patients undergoing HSCT in the inpatient setting.
Methods. Within two healthcare systems, we identified patients who would receive conditioning chemotherapy and subsequent HSCT in the inpatient setting. Pre-chemotherapy stool was collected, sequenced with shotgun metagenomics, and analyzed for gut microbial diversity using Inverse-Simpson index. The length of admission or length of stay during their transplant process was recorded. We assessed whether there was an association with gut microbial diversity and length of stay.
Results. 24 patients we evaluated for diversity and length of stay. There was no significant correlation between age or gender and length of stay. Significant difference in length of stay was seen between allogenic vs autogenic transplants (p value ≤0.01). Within the 24 patients, lengths of stay ranged from 8 to 36 days with a mean average of 20.9 days. Gut diversity ranged from 1.8 to 23.9. An overall negative association between length of stay and diversity was seen, though this was determined not statistically significant (p value 0.09).
Length of Stay correlation with pre-chemotherapy Gut Microbiome diversity