Abstract

Background

Neurological opportunistic infections cause significant morbidity and mortality in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) but are difficult to diagnose.

Methods

One hundred forty people with HIV with acute neurological symptoms from Iquitos, Peru, were evaluated for cerebral toxoplasmosis with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and for cryptococcal meningitis with cryptococcal antigen test (CrAg) in serum or CSF. Differences between groups were assessed with standard statistical methods. A subset of samples was evaluated by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of CSF to compare standard diagnostics and identify additional diagnoses.

Results

Twenty-seven participants were diagnosed with cerebral toxoplasmosis by qPCR and 13 with cryptococcal meningitis by CrAg. Compared to participants without cerebral toxoplasmosis, abnormal Glasgow Coma Scale score (P = .05), unilateral focal motor signs (P = .01), positive Babinski reflex (P = .01), and multiple lesions on head computed tomography (CT) (P = .002) were associated with cerebral toxoplasmosis. Photophobia (P = .03) and absence of lesions on head CT (P = .02) were associated with cryptococcal meningitis. mNGS of 42 samples identified 8 cases of cerebral toxoplasmosis, 7 cases of cryptococcal meningitis, 5 possible cases of tuberculous meningitis, and incidental detections of hepatitis B virus (n = 1) and pegivirus (n = 1). mNGS had a positive percentage agreement of 71% and a negative percentage agreement of 91% with qPCR for T gondii. mNGS had a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 100% for Cryptococcus diagnosis.

Conclusions

An infection was diagnosed by any method in only 34% of participants, demonstrating the challenges of diagnosing neurological opportunistic infections in this population and highlighting the need for broader, more sensitive diagnostic tests for central nervous system infections.

Approximately 60% of people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) develop a neurological complication during their lifetime [1]. Etiologies include opportunistic infections (OIs), other infections, malignancy, medication toxicity, and complications of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) itself such as dementia, myelopathy, and sensorimotor neuropathy. While antiretrovirals (ARVs) diminish the risk of OIs and HIV-associated neurologic complications, undiagnosed and untreated PWH remain at risk.

Neurological OIs have decreased in incidence since implementation of ARVs; however, they remain significant sources of morbidity and mortality [1]. Cerebral toxoplasmosis and cryptococcal meningitis are 2 of the most common neurological OIs in PWH worldwide and in Peru, where an autopsy study found that Toxoplasma and Cryptococcus were the second and third most common neurological pathogens in PWH [2, 3]. Cerebral toxoplasmosis is caused by reactivation of latent Toxoplasma gondii infection in the brain. Definitive diagnosis is by brain biopsy, which is rarely performed because of associated risks and need for neurosurgical services. Thus, most persons are diagnosed in a clinically accepted manner, including clinicians treating empirically and pursuing other diagnoses if there is poor response to treatment after 2 weeks [4–6]. The standard-of-care laboratory diagnosis, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), while highly specific, lacks sensitivity (35%–70%) [4–6]. Meningitis caused by Cryptococcus neoformans is easier to diagnose: A commercially available lateral flow assay (LFA) has 99% sensitivity and specificity for cryptococcal antigen in serum and CSF as compared to cryptococcal latex agglutination [7, 8].

Neurological conditions in PWH often have nonspecific signs and symptoms like headache, confusion, fever, focal deficits, and mental status changes, making diagnosis difficult without advanced diagnostic testing. Advances in metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) have recently begun aiding clinicians in complex diagnostic scenarios [9].

This study describes clinical and laboratory findings of persons with cerebral toxoplasmosis and cryptococcal meningitis and explores mNGS to diagnose these diseases and other neurological infections. Improved understanding of the range of diagnoses and their associated clinical findings in this patient group will aid both clinicians and researchers.

METHODS

Patient Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from each patient or their healthcare proxy. The design of the work has been approved by local ethical committees of the Hospital Regional de Loreto, Iquitos, Peru (ID-044-CIEI-2019) and Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru (100804), and by the institutional review boards of the international supporting sites (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [#14-1253], Johns Hopkins University [9528], and University of California, San Francisco [IRB 13-12236]).

Study Site and Population

Participants were recruited between August 2014 and March 2020 from Hospital Regional de Loreto in the city of Iquitos, Peru (population ∼400 000) as part of a multisite cohort of PWH designed to study neurological OIs and develop diagnostic tests. Hospital Regional is a public hospital that serves the department of Loreto (population >800 000). Loreto's adjusted HIV mortality rate (21.2/100 000) is the highest in Peru (national average 3.9/100 000) [10].

Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, laboratory-confirmed HIV infection, onset of neurological symptoms within the prior 6 months, and written informed consent. Participants completed a questionnaire about demographic and medical history and underwent physical examination, including neurological examination. Blood and urine were obtained, and remnant CSF was collected if lumbar puncture was performed by the participant's medical providers. Hospital course and laboratory values were abstracted from the medical record, and diagnostic testing was performed as described below and in the Supplementary Methods.

Definition of Cases

Cerebral toxoplasmosis cases were defined for the purposes of this study by positive T gondii qPCR (cycle threshold [Ct] of ≤37; see Supplementary Methods), and cryptococcal meningitis cases were defined by positive cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) LFA (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma) in either serum or CSF as described in the Supplementary Methods.

CSF Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing

Details of mNGS library preparation and sequencing are described in the Supplementary Methods. In brief, pathogen RNA and DNA were extracted and sequencing libraries prepared using commercial kits. Sequencing was performed using New England Biolabs’ (Ipswich, Massachusetts) NEBNext Ultra II RNA and DNA library preparation kits as previously described, and sequencing libraries were sequenced on Illumina NovaSeq [11]. The open-source, cloud-based metagenomics pipeline CZ ID was used for mNGS analysis [12]. Positive samples by mNGS were defined as 1 or more sequences aligning to a pathogen, with the entire sequence aligning (with no alignment to any other species) to the pathogen genome with ≥99% nucleotide sequence identity, which was confirmed through Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) [11]. Several pathogens can be incidentally detected on CSF mNGS without clear disease association; these include Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, human herpesvirus 6, and human herpesvirus 7. In these cases, only clear outlier cases defined as log10 (reads Per Million [rPM]) 2-fold greater than the mean abundance of the entire cohort were presumed pathogenic [11].

Computed Tomography

A neurologist reviewed all head CT scans and recorded data in a standardized questionnaire (Supplementary Table 1). History, physical examination findings, CD4 and CD8 cell counts, and HIV viral load (VL) were provided, but microbiological results were not.

Statistical Analysis

Univariate relationships between each outcome (cerebral toxoplasmosis, cryptococcal meningitis, and mortality) and demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiographic covariates were explored using χ2, Fisher exact, or Kruskal-Wallis tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for numerical variables. Poisson regression with robust variance to estimate prevalence ratios (PR). Poisson regression was selected because of the ratio of positive to negative participants for the outcome variables. Data were analyzed using Stata version 15.0 software (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas).

RESULTS

One hundred forty PWH with specific pathogen testing were included in the analyses (Figure 1, Table 1). Median age was 34 years (interquartile range [IQR], 28–42 years). Median time since HIV diagnosis was 1.3 years (IQR, 10 days–6.15 years), and 40% of participants were diagnosed with HIV ≤90 days prior to enrollment. Fifty-two percent of participants were taking ARVs. CD4 cell count and HIV VL within 1 year of study participation were only available for 54% and 49% of participants, respectively: median CD4 count was 81 (IQR, 34–216) cells/mL, and median VL was 58 500 (IQR, 354–300 500) copies/mL. Twenty participants (14%) had undetectable HIV VL. Ninety-seven percent of participants had positive T gondii immunoglobulin G serology (Table 1). Sixty-nine percent of participants (n = 96) had a head CT, though only 15 received contrast.

Study participant enrollment and testing. Of 140 participants, 91 were tested for both Toxoplasma gondii and Cryptococcus neoformans, 25 received only T gondii quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) testing, and 24 received only cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing. Participants received incomplete testing due to supply chain problems with the CrAg lateral flow assay or lack of cerebrospinal fluid specimen for T gondii qPCR. Abbreviations: CrAg-LFA, cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; HIV+, human immunodeficiency virus positive; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 1.

Study participant enrollment and testing. Of 140 participants, 91 were tested for both Toxoplasma gondii and Cryptococcus neoformans, 25 received only T gondii quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) testing, and 24 received only cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing. Participants received incomplete testing due to supply chain problems with the CrAg lateral flow assay or lack of cerebrospinal fluid specimen for T gondii qPCR. Abbreviations: CrAg-LFA, cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; HIV+, human immunodeficiency virus positive; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Table 1.

Baseline Demographic, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, and Laboratory Findings for Included Patients

Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)
Demographics
 Age, y34 (28–42)
 Sex, male107/138 (78%)
 Years of education9 (7–11)
 Location (urban)78/136 (57%)
HIV
 Time since diagnosis1.3 y (10 d–6.15 y)
  <3 mo53/133 (40%)
  3–6 mo5/133 (4%)
  6 mo–1 y7/133 (5%)
  1–2 y17/133 (13%)
  3–4 y13/133 (10%)
  5–9 y26/133 (20%)
  ≥10 y12/133 (9%)
 Treatment (% yes)71/138 (52%)
  FTC ± TDF ± EFV15/71 (21%)
  EFV ± 3TC ± TDF12/71 (17%)
  ABC ± 3TC ± EFV8/71 (11%)
  3TC ± ZDV ± EFV8/71 (11%)
  Other11/71 (15%)
  Unknown17/71 (24%)
 Frequency of forgetting treatment
  Once per week6/53 (11%)
  Twice per week6/53 (11%)
  3 times per week3/53 (6%)
  4 times per week18/53 (34%)
  Unknown/missing20/53 (38%)
Standard blood laboratory findings
 Leukocytes/mm35400 (3570–7770)
 Lymphocytes/mm3820 (485–1525)
 Neutrophils/mm33690 (2300–4900)
 Eosinophils/mm340 (10–140)
 Platelets/mm3266 000 (190 000–339 000)
 Hematocrit(%)31 (27–35)
 CD4 cells/mm381 (34–216)
 CD8 cells/mm3833 (472–1113)
 Log Viral Load/mm358 500 (354–300 500)
Diagnostic laboratory findings
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)128/132 (97%)
Toxoplasma gondii qPCR CSF (% positive)27/115 (24%)
 CrAg-LFA serum (% positive)8/92 (9%)
 CrAg-LFA CSF (% positive)7/56 (13%)
Imaging findings
 Neurological toxoplasmosis
  Probable16/98 (16%)
  Possible5/98 (5%)
  Less likely6/98 (6%)
 Meningitic process
  Probable11/98 (11%)
  Possible9/98 (9%)
  Less likely6/98 (6%)
 Survival (% living)53/114 (46%)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)
Demographics
 Age, y34 (28–42)
 Sex, male107/138 (78%)
 Years of education9 (7–11)
 Location (urban)78/136 (57%)
HIV
 Time since diagnosis1.3 y (10 d–6.15 y)
  <3 mo53/133 (40%)
  3–6 mo5/133 (4%)
  6 mo–1 y7/133 (5%)
  1–2 y17/133 (13%)
  3–4 y13/133 (10%)
  5–9 y26/133 (20%)
  ≥10 y12/133 (9%)
 Treatment (% yes)71/138 (52%)
  FTC ± TDF ± EFV15/71 (21%)
  EFV ± 3TC ± TDF12/71 (17%)
  ABC ± 3TC ± EFV8/71 (11%)
  3TC ± ZDV ± EFV8/71 (11%)
  Other11/71 (15%)
  Unknown17/71 (24%)
 Frequency of forgetting treatment
  Once per week6/53 (11%)
  Twice per week6/53 (11%)
  3 times per week3/53 (6%)
  4 times per week18/53 (34%)
  Unknown/missing20/53 (38%)
Standard blood laboratory findings
 Leukocytes/mm35400 (3570–7770)
 Lymphocytes/mm3820 (485–1525)
 Neutrophils/mm33690 (2300–4900)
 Eosinophils/mm340 (10–140)
 Platelets/mm3266 000 (190 000–339 000)
 Hematocrit(%)31 (27–35)
 CD4 cells/mm381 (34–216)
 CD8 cells/mm3833 (472–1113)
 Log Viral Load/mm358 500 (354–300 500)
Diagnostic laboratory findings
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)128/132 (97%)
Toxoplasma gondii qPCR CSF (% positive)27/115 (24%)
 CrAg-LFA serum (% positive)8/92 (9%)
 CrAg-LFA CSF (% positive)7/56 (13%)
Imaging findings
 Neurological toxoplasmosis
  Probable16/98 (16%)
  Possible5/98 (5%)
  Less likely6/98 (6%)
 Meningitic process
  Probable11/98 (11%)
  Possible9/98 (9%)
  Less likely6/98 (6%)
 Survival (% living)53/114 (46%)

Abbreviations: 3TC, lamivudine; ABC, abacavir; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CrAg-LFA, cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IQR, interquartile range; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; ZDV, zidovudine.

Table 1.

Baseline Demographic, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, and Laboratory Findings for Included Patients

Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)
Demographics
 Age, y34 (28–42)
 Sex, male107/138 (78%)
 Years of education9 (7–11)
 Location (urban)78/136 (57%)
HIV
 Time since diagnosis1.3 y (10 d–6.15 y)
  <3 mo53/133 (40%)
  3–6 mo5/133 (4%)
  6 mo–1 y7/133 (5%)
  1–2 y17/133 (13%)
  3–4 y13/133 (10%)
  5–9 y26/133 (20%)
  ≥10 y12/133 (9%)
 Treatment (% yes)71/138 (52%)
  FTC ± TDF ± EFV15/71 (21%)
  EFV ± 3TC ± TDF12/71 (17%)
  ABC ± 3TC ± EFV8/71 (11%)
  3TC ± ZDV ± EFV8/71 (11%)
  Other11/71 (15%)
  Unknown17/71 (24%)
 Frequency of forgetting treatment
  Once per week6/53 (11%)
  Twice per week6/53 (11%)
  3 times per week3/53 (6%)
  4 times per week18/53 (34%)
  Unknown/missing20/53 (38%)
Standard blood laboratory findings
 Leukocytes/mm35400 (3570–7770)
 Lymphocytes/mm3820 (485–1525)
 Neutrophils/mm33690 (2300–4900)
 Eosinophils/mm340 (10–140)
 Platelets/mm3266 000 (190 000–339 000)
 Hematocrit(%)31 (27–35)
 CD4 cells/mm381 (34–216)
 CD8 cells/mm3833 (472–1113)
 Log Viral Load/mm358 500 (354–300 500)
Diagnostic laboratory findings
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)128/132 (97%)
Toxoplasma gondii qPCR CSF (% positive)27/115 (24%)
 CrAg-LFA serum (% positive)8/92 (9%)
 CrAg-LFA CSF (% positive)7/56 (13%)
Imaging findings
 Neurological toxoplasmosis
  Probable16/98 (16%)
  Possible5/98 (5%)
  Less likely6/98 (6%)
 Meningitic process
  Probable11/98 (11%)
  Possible9/98 (9%)
  Less likely6/98 (6%)
 Survival (% living)53/114 (46%)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)
Demographics
 Age, y34 (28–42)
 Sex, male107/138 (78%)
 Years of education9 (7–11)
 Location (urban)78/136 (57%)
HIV
 Time since diagnosis1.3 y (10 d–6.15 y)
  <3 mo53/133 (40%)
  3–6 mo5/133 (4%)
  6 mo–1 y7/133 (5%)
  1–2 y17/133 (13%)
  3–4 y13/133 (10%)
  5–9 y26/133 (20%)
  ≥10 y12/133 (9%)
 Treatment (% yes)71/138 (52%)
  FTC ± TDF ± EFV15/71 (21%)
  EFV ± 3TC ± TDF12/71 (17%)
  ABC ± 3TC ± EFV8/71 (11%)
  3TC ± ZDV ± EFV8/71 (11%)
  Other11/71 (15%)
  Unknown17/71 (24%)
 Frequency of forgetting treatment
  Once per week6/53 (11%)
  Twice per week6/53 (11%)
  3 times per week3/53 (6%)
  4 times per week18/53 (34%)
  Unknown/missing20/53 (38%)
Standard blood laboratory findings
 Leukocytes/mm35400 (3570–7770)
 Lymphocytes/mm3820 (485–1525)
 Neutrophils/mm33690 (2300–4900)
 Eosinophils/mm340 (10–140)
 Platelets/mm3266 000 (190 000–339 000)
 Hematocrit(%)31 (27–35)
 CD4 cells/mm381 (34–216)
 CD8 cells/mm3833 (472–1113)
 Log Viral Load/mm358 500 (354–300 500)
Diagnostic laboratory findings
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)128/132 (97%)
Toxoplasma gondii qPCR CSF (% positive)27/115 (24%)
 CrAg-LFA serum (% positive)8/92 (9%)
 CrAg-LFA CSF (% positive)7/56 (13%)
Imaging findings
 Neurological toxoplasmosis
  Probable16/98 (16%)
  Possible5/98 (5%)
  Less likely6/98 (6%)
 Meningitic process
  Probable11/98 (11%)
  Possible9/98 (9%)
  Less likely6/98 (6%)
 Survival (% living)53/114 (46%)

Abbreviations: 3TC, lamivudine; ABC, abacavir; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CrAg-LFA, cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IQR, interquartile range; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; ZDV, zidovudine.

Of 115 participants (82%) tested for cerebral toxoplasmosis by qPCR, 27 (23%) were positive (Table 2). Mortality was 40% in those with cerebral toxoplasmosis and 45% in qPCR-negative participants (PR, 1.22 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .61–2.44]). There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between positive and negative participants. The qPCR-positive participants were more likely to have an abnormal Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (<15), (P = .05), focal motor signs (P = .01), or positive Babinski reflex (P = .01) than negative participants. All T gondii qPCR-positive patients reported missing their ARVs at least once per week (P = .04). There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower median CD4 count in qPCR-positive (52 [IQR, 21–81] cells/mm3) versus qPCR-negative participants (141 [IQR, 34–325] cells/mm3) (P = .06). Median CD8 T-cell counts were significantly higher in qPCR-positive patients (1151 [IQR, 676–1467] cells/mL) than qPCR-negative patients (776 [IQR, 473–999] cells/mL) (P = .03).

Table 2.

Demographic and Clinical Factors of Toxoplasma gondii Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction in Cerebrospinal Fluid–Positive and –Negative Patients

Toxoplasma
Positive (n = 27)Negative (n = 88)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P Valuea
Demographics
 Age, y34 (28–40)34 (31–42).59
 Sex (% male)20/26 (77%)69/87 (79%).79
 Years of education11 (8–12)9 (7–12).17
 Location (% rural)11/25 (44%)39/87 (45%).94
 Animals (% no)8/24 (33%)20/86 (24%).32
Symptoms
 Weight loss (% yes)22/26 (85%)79/87 (91%).37
 Fever and chills (% yes)21/26 (81%)69/86 (80%).95
 Night sweats (% yes)16/25 (64%)50/82 (61%).79
 Seizures (% yes)7/23 (30%)24/81 (30%).94
 Headache (% yes)21/25 (84%)77/86 (90%).45
 Neck stiffness (% yes)9/24 (38%)17/75 (23%).15
 Photophobia (% yes)7/25 (28%)27/84 (32%).70
Neurological exam findings
 GCS score13.5 (9–15)14 (14–15).01
 GCS score binary (% <15)19/26 (73%)44/86 (51%).05
 MMSE (total score)b11 (9–27)19.5 (9–26.5).30
 IHIVDSc9 (4–9)9 (4–9).91
 Gait abnormalities (% yes)3/5 (60%)10/32 (31%).21
 Romberg sign (% positive)3/5 (60%)10/32 (31%).74
 Alternating movement test (% abnormal)3/12 (25%)9/51 (18%).56
 Nose to finger (% abnormal)3/12 (25%)12/55 (22%).81
 Diminished global strength (% positive)15/19 (79%)33/68 (49%).02
 Focal sensory signs (unilateral)10/25 (40%)20/82 (24%).13
 Focal motor signs (unilateral)17/25 (68%)30/82 (37%).01
 Babinski reflex (% positive)17/26 (65%)31/82 (38%).01
 Trömner sign (% positive)4/26 (15%)12/82 (15%).93
HIV
 Time since diagnosis2.8 y (17 d–5.8 y)352 d (5 d–6.5 y).74
 Treatment (% yes)12/24 (50%)44/84 (52%).84
 Forget treatment (% yes)8/8 (100%)24/39 (62%).04
 Previous opportunistic infection8/21 (38%)22/69 (31%).60
Laboratory findings (blood)
 Leukocytes/mm34760 (3200–10 000)5710 (3755–7780).41
 Lymphocytes/mm3567 (410–880)880 (490–1690).11
 Hematocrit(%)32.2 (28–34)31.9 (27–36).87
 CD4 cells/mm3d,e52 (21–81)141 (34–325).06
 CD8 cells/mm3e115 (68–147)78 (47–100).03
 Ratio CD4/CD80.09 (0.03–0.3)0.06 (0.16–0.34).28
 Log Viral Load/mm310.1 (8–12)10.4 (5.8–12.5)1.00
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)26/26 (100%)80/82 (98%)1.00
Clinical outcomes
 Treatment with TMP-SMX (% yes)24/27 (88%)75/88 (85%).63
 Survival at 6 mo (% living)10/25 (40%)33/71 (46%).58
Toxoplasma
Positive (n = 27)Negative (n = 88)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P Valuea
Demographics
 Age, y34 (28–40)34 (31–42).59
 Sex (% male)20/26 (77%)69/87 (79%).79
 Years of education11 (8–12)9 (7–12).17
 Location (% rural)11/25 (44%)39/87 (45%).94
 Animals (% no)8/24 (33%)20/86 (24%).32
Symptoms
 Weight loss (% yes)22/26 (85%)79/87 (91%).37
 Fever and chills (% yes)21/26 (81%)69/86 (80%).95
 Night sweats (% yes)16/25 (64%)50/82 (61%).79
 Seizures (% yes)7/23 (30%)24/81 (30%).94
 Headache (% yes)21/25 (84%)77/86 (90%).45
 Neck stiffness (% yes)9/24 (38%)17/75 (23%).15
 Photophobia (% yes)7/25 (28%)27/84 (32%).70
Neurological exam findings
 GCS score13.5 (9–15)14 (14–15).01
 GCS score binary (% <15)19/26 (73%)44/86 (51%).05
 MMSE (total score)b11 (9–27)19.5 (9–26.5).30
 IHIVDSc9 (4–9)9 (4–9).91
 Gait abnormalities (% yes)3/5 (60%)10/32 (31%).21
 Romberg sign (% positive)3/5 (60%)10/32 (31%).74
 Alternating movement test (% abnormal)3/12 (25%)9/51 (18%).56
 Nose to finger (% abnormal)3/12 (25%)12/55 (22%).81
 Diminished global strength (% positive)15/19 (79%)33/68 (49%).02
 Focal sensory signs (unilateral)10/25 (40%)20/82 (24%).13
 Focal motor signs (unilateral)17/25 (68%)30/82 (37%).01
 Babinski reflex (% positive)17/26 (65%)31/82 (38%).01
 Trömner sign (% positive)4/26 (15%)12/82 (15%).93
HIV
 Time since diagnosis2.8 y (17 d–5.8 y)352 d (5 d–6.5 y).74
 Treatment (% yes)12/24 (50%)44/84 (52%).84
 Forget treatment (% yes)8/8 (100%)24/39 (62%).04
 Previous opportunistic infection8/21 (38%)22/69 (31%).60
Laboratory findings (blood)
 Leukocytes/mm34760 (3200–10 000)5710 (3755–7780).41
 Lymphocytes/mm3567 (410–880)880 (490–1690).11
 Hematocrit(%)32.2 (28–34)31.9 (27–36).87
 CD4 cells/mm3d,e52 (21–81)141 (34–325).06
 CD8 cells/mm3e115 (68–147)78 (47–100).03
 Ratio CD4/CD80.09 (0.03–0.3)0.06 (0.16–0.34).28
 Log Viral Load/mm310.1 (8–12)10.4 (5.8–12.5)1.00
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)26/26 (100%)80/82 (98%)1.00
Clinical outcomes
 Treatment with TMP-SMX (% yes)24/27 (88%)75/88 (85%).63
 Survival at 6 mo (% living)10/25 (40%)33/71 (46%).58

Significant Values in bold. Abbreviations: GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IHIVDS, International HIV Dementia Scale; IQR, interquartile range; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

aP values were calculated with χ2 tests or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for numerical variables.

bNormal MMSE >25.

cNormal IHIVDS >10.

dOnly individuals with a CD4 count in the last year were included in the analysis.

eRegression analysis completed using CD4 cells/mm3/100 cells/mm3 and CD8 cells/mm3/100 cells/mm3.

Table 2.

Demographic and Clinical Factors of Toxoplasma gondii Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction in Cerebrospinal Fluid–Positive and –Negative Patients

Toxoplasma
Positive (n = 27)Negative (n = 88)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P Valuea
Demographics
 Age, y34 (28–40)34 (31–42).59
 Sex (% male)20/26 (77%)69/87 (79%).79
 Years of education11 (8–12)9 (7–12).17
 Location (% rural)11/25 (44%)39/87 (45%).94
 Animals (% no)8/24 (33%)20/86 (24%).32
Symptoms
 Weight loss (% yes)22/26 (85%)79/87 (91%).37
 Fever and chills (% yes)21/26 (81%)69/86 (80%).95
 Night sweats (% yes)16/25 (64%)50/82 (61%).79
 Seizures (% yes)7/23 (30%)24/81 (30%).94
 Headache (% yes)21/25 (84%)77/86 (90%).45
 Neck stiffness (% yes)9/24 (38%)17/75 (23%).15
 Photophobia (% yes)7/25 (28%)27/84 (32%).70
Neurological exam findings
 GCS score13.5 (9–15)14 (14–15).01
 GCS score binary (% <15)19/26 (73%)44/86 (51%).05
 MMSE (total score)b11 (9–27)19.5 (9–26.5).30
 IHIVDSc9 (4–9)9 (4–9).91
 Gait abnormalities (% yes)3/5 (60%)10/32 (31%).21
 Romberg sign (% positive)3/5 (60%)10/32 (31%).74
 Alternating movement test (% abnormal)3/12 (25%)9/51 (18%).56
 Nose to finger (% abnormal)3/12 (25%)12/55 (22%).81
 Diminished global strength (% positive)15/19 (79%)33/68 (49%).02
 Focal sensory signs (unilateral)10/25 (40%)20/82 (24%).13
 Focal motor signs (unilateral)17/25 (68%)30/82 (37%).01
 Babinski reflex (% positive)17/26 (65%)31/82 (38%).01
 Trömner sign (% positive)4/26 (15%)12/82 (15%).93
HIV
 Time since diagnosis2.8 y (17 d–5.8 y)352 d (5 d–6.5 y).74
 Treatment (% yes)12/24 (50%)44/84 (52%).84
 Forget treatment (% yes)8/8 (100%)24/39 (62%).04
 Previous opportunistic infection8/21 (38%)22/69 (31%).60
Laboratory findings (blood)
 Leukocytes/mm34760 (3200–10 000)5710 (3755–7780).41
 Lymphocytes/mm3567 (410–880)880 (490–1690).11
 Hematocrit(%)32.2 (28–34)31.9 (27–36).87
 CD4 cells/mm3d,e52 (21–81)141 (34–325).06
 CD8 cells/mm3e115 (68–147)78 (47–100).03
 Ratio CD4/CD80.09 (0.03–0.3)0.06 (0.16–0.34).28
 Log Viral Load/mm310.1 (8–12)10.4 (5.8–12.5)1.00
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)26/26 (100%)80/82 (98%)1.00
Clinical outcomes
 Treatment with TMP-SMX (% yes)24/27 (88%)75/88 (85%).63
 Survival at 6 mo (% living)10/25 (40%)33/71 (46%).58
Toxoplasma
Positive (n = 27)Negative (n = 88)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P Valuea
Demographics
 Age, y34 (28–40)34 (31–42).59
 Sex (% male)20/26 (77%)69/87 (79%).79
 Years of education11 (8–12)9 (7–12).17
 Location (% rural)11/25 (44%)39/87 (45%).94
 Animals (% no)8/24 (33%)20/86 (24%).32
Symptoms
 Weight loss (% yes)22/26 (85%)79/87 (91%).37
 Fever and chills (% yes)21/26 (81%)69/86 (80%).95
 Night sweats (% yes)16/25 (64%)50/82 (61%).79
 Seizures (% yes)7/23 (30%)24/81 (30%).94
 Headache (% yes)21/25 (84%)77/86 (90%).45
 Neck stiffness (% yes)9/24 (38%)17/75 (23%).15
 Photophobia (% yes)7/25 (28%)27/84 (32%).70
Neurological exam findings
 GCS score13.5 (9–15)14 (14–15).01
 GCS score binary (% <15)19/26 (73%)44/86 (51%).05
 MMSE (total score)b11 (9–27)19.5 (9–26.5).30
 IHIVDSc9 (4–9)9 (4–9).91
 Gait abnormalities (% yes)3/5 (60%)10/32 (31%).21
 Romberg sign (% positive)3/5 (60%)10/32 (31%).74
 Alternating movement test (% abnormal)3/12 (25%)9/51 (18%).56
 Nose to finger (% abnormal)3/12 (25%)12/55 (22%).81
 Diminished global strength (% positive)15/19 (79%)33/68 (49%).02
 Focal sensory signs (unilateral)10/25 (40%)20/82 (24%).13
 Focal motor signs (unilateral)17/25 (68%)30/82 (37%).01
 Babinski reflex (% positive)17/26 (65%)31/82 (38%).01
 Trömner sign (% positive)4/26 (15%)12/82 (15%).93
HIV
 Time since diagnosis2.8 y (17 d–5.8 y)352 d (5 d–6.5 y).74
 Treatment (% yes)12/24 (50%)44/84 (52%).84
 Forget treatment (% yes)8/8 (100%)24/39 (62%).04
 Previous opportunistic infection8/21 (38%)22/69 (31%).60
Laboratory findings (blood)
 Leukocytes/mm34760 (3200–10 000)5710 (3755–7780).41
 Lymphocytes/mm3567 (410–880)880 (490–1690).11
 Hematocrit(%)32.2 (28–34)31.9 (27–36).87
 CD4 cells/mm3d,e52 (21–81)141 (34–325).06
 CD8 cells/mm3e115 (68–147)78 (47–100).03
 Ratio CD4/CD80.09 (0.03–0.3)0.06 (0.16–0.34).28
 Log Viral Load/mm310.1 (8–12)10.4 (5.8–12.5)1.00
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)26/26 (100%)80/82 (98%)1.00
Clinical outcomes
 Treatment with TMP-SMX (% yes)24/27 (88%)75/88 (85%).63
 Survival at 6 mo (% living)10/25 (40%)33/71 (46%).58

Significant Values in bold. Abbreviations: GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IHIVDS, International HIV Dementia Scale; IQR, interquartile range; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

aP values were calculated with χ2 tests or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for numerical variables.

bNormal MMSE >25.

cNormal IHIVDS >10.

dOnly individuals with a CD4 count in the last year were included in the analysis.

eRegression analysis completed using CD4 cells/mm3/100 cells/mm3 and CD8 cells/mm3/100 cells/mm3.

Eighteen qPCR-positive and 60 qPCR-negative patients underwent head CT (Table 3). Of 18 qPCR-positive participants’ CT scans, 10 were classified as probable, 3 possible, 4 less likely, and 1 not consistent with cerebral toxoplasmosis (Supplementary Table 1). Of 60 qPCR-negative participants’ CT scans, 6 were classified as probable, 2 possible, and 2 less likely cases of cerebral toxoplasmosis (Supplementary Table 1). qPCR-positive patients were more likely to have any lesions (P = .002), more lesions (P < .001), hyperdense lesions (P < .001), bilateral lesions (P = .01), edema (P < .001), mass effect (P < .001), white matter changes (P = .012), or more diffuse white matter changes (P < .001) (Table 3). There was a significant inverse relationship (R2 = .13, P = .02) between qPCR Ct and number of lesions identified on head CT (Figure 2). Only 14 scans were performed with contrast; analyses were performed stratified by receipt of contrast (Supplementary Table 2). The only difference between contrast and noncontrast groups was identification of white matter changes (Supplementary Table 2). Eight participants had follow-up CTs described in Supplementary Table 3.

Relationship between Toxoplasma gondii quantitative polymerase chain reaction cycle threshold and number of lesions on head computed tomography. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CT, computed tomography; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 2.

Relationship between Toxoplasma gondii quantitative polymerase chain reaction cycle threshold and number of lesions on head computed tomography. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CT, computed tomography; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Table 3.

Head Computed Tomography Results by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction of Toxoplasma gondii

Toxoplasma
Positive (n = 18)Negative (n = 60)Poisson Regression With Robust Variance
CT Findingsno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P ValueaPR(95% CI)P Value
Lesions (% yes)16/18 (89%)29/60 (48%).0015.87(1.43–23.9).01
No. of lesions
 None2 (6%)32 (94%)<.001Ref.
 15 (28%)13 (72%)4.72(1.01–22.2).05
 2–56 (33%)12 (67%)5.67(1.26–25.5).02
 6–103 (50%)3 (50%)8.50(1.76–41.1).01
 11–202 (100%)0
No. of hyperdense lesions
 None8 (13%)54 (87%)<.001Ref.
 15 (56%)4 (44%)4.31(1.79–10.4).006
 2–54 (67%)2 (33%)5.17(2.18–12.27).006
 6–101 (100%)0
No. of hypodense lesions
 None7 (17%)35 (83%).12Ref.
 12 (17%)10 (83%)1.00(.24–4.24)1.00
 2–55 (29%)12 (71%)1.77(.65–4.83).27
 6–103 (50%)3 (50%)3.00(1.05–8.61).04
 11–201 (100%)06.00(3.04–11.9)<.001
No. of affected hemispheres
 None3 (9%)31 (91%).01Ref.
 16 (25%)18 (75%)2.83(.78–10.3).11
 29 (45%)11 (55%)5.10(1.55–16.8).01
Edema
 None3 (7%)38 (93%)<.001Ref.
 Minor5 (24%)16 (76%)3.25(.85–12.4).08
 Moderate7 (58%)5 (42%)7.97(2.41–26.4).001
 Severe3 (75%)1 (25%)10.25(2.98–35.3)<.001
Mass effect
 None6 (10%)52 (90%)<.001Ref.
 Minor5 (46%)6 (55%)4.39(1.61–12.0).004
 Moderate6 (75%)2 (25%)7.25(3.06–17.2)<.001
 Severe1 (100%)0
Hydrocephalus (% yes)1/18 (6%)5/60 (8%).700.71(.11–4.48).71
White matter changes (% yes)9/18 (50%)12/60 (20%).012.71(1.24–5.93).01
Type of white matter changes
 None9 (16%)48 (84%).001Ref.
 Minor3 (25%)9 (75%)1.58(.50–5.03).44
 Moderate6 (86%)1 (14%)5.43(2.76–10.7)<.001
 Generalized02 (100%)
Toxoplasma
Positive (n = 18)Negative (n = 60)Poisson Regression With Robust Variance
CT Findingsno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P ValueaPR(95% CI)P Value
Lesions (% yes)16/18 (89%)29/60 (48%).0015.87(1.43–23.9).01
No. of lesions
 None2 (6%)32 (94%)<.001Ref.
 15 (28%)13 (72%)4.72(1.01–22.2).05
 2–56 (33%)12 (67%)5.67(1.26–25.5).02
 6–103 (50%)3 (50%)8.50(1.76–41.1).01
 11–202 (100%)0
No. of hyperdense lesions
 None8 (13%)54 (87%)<.001Ref.
 15 (56%)4 (44%)4.31(1.79–10.4).006
 2–54 (67%)2 (33%)5.17(2.18–12.27).006
 6–101 (100%)0
No. of hypodense lesions
 None7 (17%)35 (83%).12Ref.
 12 (17%)10 (83%)1.00(.24–4.24)1.00
 2–55 (29%)12 (71%)1.77(.65–4.83).27
 6–103 (50%)3 (50%)3.00(1.05–8.61).04
 11–201 (100%)06.00(3.04–11.9)<.001
No. of affected hemispheres
 None3 (9%)31 (91%).01Ref.
 16 (25%)18 (75%)2.83(.78–10.3).11
 29 (45%)11 (55%)5.10(1.55–16.8).01
Edema
 None3 (7%)38 (93%)<.001Ref.
 Minor5 (24%)16 (76%)3.25(.85–12.4).08
 Moderate7 (58%)5 (42%)7.97(2.41–26.4).001
 Severe3 (75%)1 (25%)10.25(2.98–35.3)<.001
Mass effect
 None6 (10%)52 (90%)<.001Ref.
 Minor5 (46%)6 (55%)4.39(1.61–12.0).004
 Moderate6 (75%)2 (25%)7.25(3.06–17.2)<.001
 Severe1 (100%)0
Hydrocephalus (% yes)1/18 (6%)5/60 (8%).700.71(.11–4.48).71
White matter changes (% yes)9/18 (50%)12/60 (20%).012.71(1.24–5.93).01
Type of white matter changes
 None9 (16%)48 (84%).001Ref.
 Minor3 (25%)9 (75%)1.58(.50–5.03).44
 Moderate6 (86%)1 (14%)5.43(2.76–10.7)<.001
 Generalized02 (100%)

Significant Values in bold. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography; IQR, interquartile range; PR, prevalence ratio.

aP values were calculated with χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for numerical variables.

Table 3.

Head Computed Tomography Results by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction of Toxoplasma gondii

Toxoplasma
Positive (n = 18)Negative (n = 60)Poisson Regression With Robust Variance
CT Findingsno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P ValueaPR(95% CI)P Value
Lesions (% yes)16/18 (89%)29/60 (48%).0015.87(1.43–23.9).01
No. of lesions
 None2 (6%)32 (94%)<.001Ref.
 15 (28%)13 (72%)4.72(1.01–22.2).05
 2–56 (33%)12 (67%)5.67(1.26–25.5).02
 6–103 (50%)3 (50%)8.50(1.76–41.1).01
 11–202 (100%)0
No. of hyperdense lesions
 None8 (13%)54 (87%)<.001Ref.
 15 (56%)4 (44%)4.31(1.79–10.4).006
 2–54 (67%)2 (33%)5.17(2.18–12.27).006
 6–101 (100%)0
No. of hypodense lesions
 None7 (17%)35 (83%).12Ref.
 12 (17%)10 (83%)1.00(.24–4.24)1.00
 2–55 (29%)12 (71%)1.77(.65–4.83).27
 6–103 (50%)3 (50%)3.00(1.05–8.61).04
 11–201 (100%)06.00(3.04–11.9)<.001
No. of affected hemispheres
 None3 (9%)31 (91%).01Ref.
 16 (25%)18 (75%)2.83(.78–10.3).11
 29 (45%)11 (55%)5.10(1.55–16.8).01
Edema
 None3 (7%)38 (93%)<.001Ref.
 Minor5 (24%)16 (76%)3.25(.85–12.4).08
 Moderate7 (58%)5 (42%)7.97(2.41–26.4).001
 Severe3 (75%)1 (25%)10.25(2.98–35.3)<.001
Mass effect
 None6 (10%)52 (90%)<.001Ref.
 Minor5 (46%)6 (55%)4.39(1.61–12.0).004
 Moderate6 (75%)2 (25%)7.25(3.06–17.2)<.001
 Severe1 (100%)0
Hydrocephalus (% yes)1/18 (6%)5/60 (8%).700.71(.11–4.48).71
White matter changes (% yes)9/18 (50%)12/60 (20%).012.71(1.24–5.93).01
Type of white matter changes
 None9 (16%)48 (84%).001Ref.
 Minor3 (25%)9 (75%)1.58(.50–5.03).44
 Moderate6 (86%)1 (14%)5.43(2.76–10.7)<.001
 Generalized02 (100%)
Toxoplasma
Positive (n = 18)Negative (n = 60)Poisson Regression With Robust Variance
CT Findingsno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P ValueaPR(95% CI)P Value
Lesions (% yes)16/18 (89%)29/60 (48%).0015.87(1.43–23.9).01
No. of lesions
 None2 (6%)32 (94%)<.001Ref.
 15 (28%)13 (72%)4.72(1.01–22.2).05
 2–56 (33%)12 (67%)5.67(1.26–25.5).02
 6–103 (50%)3 (50%)8.50(1.76–41.1).01
 11–202 (100%)0
No. of hyperdense lesions
 None8 (13%)54 (87%)<.001Ref.
 15 (56%)4 (44%)4.31(1.79–10.4).006
 2–54 (67%)2 (33%)5.17(2.18–12.27).006
 6–101 (100%)0
No. of hypodense lesions
 None7 (17%)35 (83%).12Ref.
 12 (17%)10 (83%)1.00(.24–4.24)1.00
 2–55 (29%)12 (71%)1.77(.65–4.83).27
 6–103 (50%)3 (50%)3.00(1.05–8.61).04
 11–201 (100%)06.00(3.04–11.9)<.001
No. of affected hemispheres
 None3 (9%)31 (91%).01Ref.
 16 (25%)18 (75%)2.83(.78–10.3).11
 29 (45%)11 (55%)5.10(1.55–16.8).01
Edema
 None3 (7%)38 (93%)<.001Ref.
 Minor5 (24%)16 (76%)3.25(.85–12.4).08
 Moderate7 (58%)5 (42%)7.97(2.41–26.4).001
 Severe3 (75%)1 (25%)10.25(2.98–35.3)<.001
Mass effect
 None6 (10%)52 (90%)<.001Ref.
 Minor5 (46%)6 (55%)4.39(1.61–12.0).004
 Moderate6 (75%)2 (25%)7.25(3.06–17.2)<.001
 Severe1 (100%)0
Hydrocephalus (% yes)1/18 (6%)5/60 (8%).700.71(.11–4.48).71
White matter changes (% yes)9/18 (50%)12/60 (20%).012.71(1.24–5.93).01
Type of white matter changes
 None9 (16%)48 (84%).001Ref.
 Minor3 (25%)9 (75%)1.58(.50–5.03).44
 Moderate6 (86%)1 (14%)5.43(2.76–10.7)<.001
 Generalized02 (100%)

Significant Values in bold. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography; IQR, interquartile range; PR, prevalence ratio.

aP values were calculated with χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for numerical variables.

Thirteen of 116 participants (11%) who were tested for C neoformans were positive for CrAg in serum or CSF. Of 32 participants tested with both CSF and serum, all had concordant results (κ = 1) (Supplementary Table 4); thus, all participants tested for C neoformans were included in the analysis regardless of specimen(s) tested.

Participants with and without Cryptococcus infection had similar demographic and clinical characteristics (Table 4). All CrAg-positive patients reported weight loss and headache. Cryptococcus-positive patients were more likely to report photophobia (P = .04) and were less likely to report night sweats than negative participants (P = .04). The patients with cryptococcal meningitis were significantly less likely to have focal sensory deficits (P < .001).

Table 4.

Demographic and Clinical Factors of Cryptococcal Antigen–Positive and –Negative Patients

Cryptococcus
Positive (n = 13)Negative (n = 103)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P Valuea
Demographics
 Age, y36 (32–41)35 (29–44).88
 Sex (% male)12/13 (92%)79/102 (77%).21
 Years of education10 (8–11)9 (7–12).93
 Location (% urban)8/12 (67%)56/100 (56%).48
 Animals (% yes)9/12 (75%)69/98 (70%).89
Symptoms
 Weight loss (% yes)13/13 (100%)91/101 (90%).60
 Fever and chills (% yes)9/13 (69%)83/101 (82%).27
 Night sweats (% yes)4/13 (31%)61/97 (63%).03
 Seizures (% yes)5/12 (42%)24/95 (25%).23
 Headache (% yes)13/13 (100%)85/100 (85%).21
 Neck stiffness (% yes)4/12 (33%)17/92 (19%).23
 Photophobia (% yes)7/13 (54%)25/100 (25%).03
Neurological exam findings
 GCS score14 (11–15)14 (13–15).98
 GCS score binary (% <15)7/13 (54%)55/102 (54%)1.00
 MMSE (total score)b15 (9–27.5)20 (9–28).74
 IHIVDSc9 (8–9)9 (4–9).32
 Gait abnormalities (% yes)0/4 (0%)15/41 (37%).29
 Romberg sign (% positive)2/4 (50%)10/37 (27%).34
 Alternating movement test (% abnormal)1/6 (17%)14/62 (23%).74
 Nose to finger (% abnormal)2/7 (28%)14/64 (22%).69
 Diminished global strength (% positive)5/10 (50%)44/81 (54%).80
 Focal sensory signs (unilateral)0/12 (0%)28/98 (29%).03
 Focal motor signs (unilateral)2/13 (15%)45/97 (46%).03
 Babinski reflex (% positive)5/13 (38%)44/99 (44%).68
 Trömner sign (% positive)2/13 (15%)13/99 (13%).82
HIV
 Time since diagnosis, y0.96 (0.01–6.09)1.09 (0.02–5.25).85
 Treatment (% yes)7/12 (58%)56/98 (57%).94
 Forget treatment (% yes)3/6 (50%)33/47 (70%).32
 Previous opportunistic infection (% yes)3/11 (27%)29/83 (35%).61
Laboratory findings (blood)
 Leukocytes/mm36580 (3570–7840)5430 (3700–7880).65
 Lymphocytes/mm3580 (285–855)810 (470–1520).13
 Hematocrit (%)35.2 (31.1–36)31.2 (26.1–34).03
 CD4 cells/mm3d,e52 (20–140)141 (40–280).18
 CD8 cells/mm3e68 (51–920)87.5 (50–132).26
 Ratio CD4/CD80.08 (0.04–0.13)0.16 (0.06–0.3).17
 Log Viral Load/mm310.8 (8.2–11.7)10.7 (5.8–12.6).92
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)11/11 (100%)96/96 (100%)
Clinical outcomes
 Treatment with AmB + FCZ (% yes)6/13 (46%)28/103 (27%).15
 Survival at 6 mo (% living)4/9 (44%)40/87 (46%).93
Cryptococcus
Positive (n = 13)Negative (n = 103)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P Valuea
Demographics
 Age, y36 (32–41)35 (29–44).88
 Sex (% male)12/13 (92%)79/102 (77%).21
 Years of education10 (8–11)9 (7–12).93
 Location (% urban)8/12 (67%)56/100 (56%).48
 Animals (% yes)9/12 (75%)69/98 (70%).89
Symptoms
 Weight loss (% yes)13/13 (100%)91/101 (90%).60
 Fever and chills (% yes)9/13 (69%)83/101 (82%).27
 Night sweats (% yes)4/13 (31%)61/97 (63%).03
 Seizures (% yes)5/12 (42%)24/95 (25%).23
 Headache (% yes)13/13 (100%)85/100 (85%).21
 Neck stiffness (% yes)4/12 (33%)17/92 (19%).23
 Photophobia (% yes)7/13 (54%)25/100 (25%).03
Neurological exam findings
 GCS score14 (11–15)14 (13–15).98
 GCS score binary (% <15)7/13 (54%)55/102 (54%)1.00
 MMSE (total score)b15 (9–27.5)20 (9–28).74
 IHIVDSc9 (8–9)9 (4–9).32
 Gait abnormalities (% yes)0/4 (0%)15/41 (37%).29
 Romberg sign (% positive)2/4 (50%)10/37 (27%).34
 Alternating movement test (% abnormal)1/6 (17%)14/62 (23%).74
 Nose to finger (% abnormal)2/7 (28%)14/64 (22%).69
 Diminished global strength (% positive)5/10 (50%)44/81 (54%).80
 Focal sensory signs (unilateral)0/12 (0%)28/98 (29%).03
 Focal motor signs (unilateral)2/13 (15%)45/97 (46%).03
 Babinski reflex (% positive)5/13 (38%)44/99 (44%).68
 Trömner sign (% positive)2/13 (15%)13/99 (13%).82
HIV
 Time since diagnosis, y0.96 (0.01–6.09)1.09 (0.02–5.25).85
 Treatment (% yes)7/12 (58%)56/98 (57%).94
 Forget treatment (% yes)3/6 (50%)33/47 (70%).32
 Previous opportunistic infection (% yes)3/11 (27%)29/83 (35%).61
Laboratory findings (blood)
 Leukocytes/mm36580 (3570–7840)5430 (3700–7880).65
 Lymphocytes/mm3580 (285–855)810 (470–1520).13
 Hematocrit (%)35.2 (31.1–36)31.2 (26.1–34).03
 CD4 cells/mm3d,e52 (20–140)141 (40–280).18
 CD8 cells/mm3e68 (51–920)87.5 (50–132).26
 Ratio CD4/CD80.08 (0.04–0.13)0.16 (0.06–0.3).17
 Log Viral Load/mm310.8 (8.2–11.7)10.7 (5.8–12.6).92
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)11/11 (100%)96/96 (100%)
Clinical outcomes
 Treatment with AmB + FCZ (% yes)6/13 (46%)28/103 (27%).15
 Survival at 6 mo (% living)4/9 (44%)40/87 (46%).93

Significant Values in bold. Abbreviations: AmB, Amphotericin B; FCZ, Fluconazole; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IHIVDS, International HIV Dementia Scale; IQR, interquartile range; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination.

aP values were calculated with χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for numerical variables.

bNormal MMSE >25.

cNormal IHIVDS >10.

dOnly individuals with a CD4 count in the last year were included in the analysis.

eRegression analysis completed using CD4 cells/mm3/100 cells/mm3 and CD8 cells/mm3/100 cells/mm3.

Table 4.

Demographic and Clinical Factors of Cryptococcal Antigen–Positive and –Negative Patients

Cryptococcus
Positive (n = 13)Negative (n = 103)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P Valuea
Demographics
 Age, y36 (32–41)35 (29–44).88
 Sex (% male)12/13 (92%)79/102 (77%).21
 Years of education10 (8–11)9 (7–12).93
 Location (% urban)8/12 (67%)56/100 (56%).48
 Animals (% yes)9/12 (75%)69/98 (70%).89
Symptoms
 Weight loss (% yes)13/13 (100%)91/101 (90%).60
 Fever and chills (% yes)9/13 (69%)83/101 (82%).27
 Night sweats (% yes)4/13 (31%)61/97 (63%).03
 Seizures (% yes)5/12 (42%)24/95 (25%).23
 Headache (% yes)13/13 (100%)85/100 (85%).21
 Neck stiffness (% yes)4/12 (33%)17/92 (19%).23
 Photophobia (% yes)7/13 (54%)25/100 (25%).03
Neurological exam findings
 GCS score14 (11–15)14 (13–15).98
 GCS score binary (% <15)7/13 (54%)55/102 (54%)1.00
 MMSE (total score)b15 (9–27.5)20 (9–28).74
 IHIVDSc9 (8–9)9 (4–9).32
 Gait abnormalities (% yes)0/4 (0%)15/41 (37%).29
 Romberg sign (% positive)2/4 (50%)10/37 (27%).34
 Alternating movement test (% abnormal)1/6 (17%)14/62 (23%).74
 Nose to finger (% abnormal)2/7 (28%)14/64 (22%).69
 Diminished global strength (% positive)5/10 (50%)44/81 (54%).80
 Focal sensory signs (unilateral)0/12 (0%)28/98 (29%).03
 Focal motor signs (unilateral)2/13 (15%)45/97 (46%).03
 Babinski reflex (% positive)5/13 (38%)44/99 (44%).68
 Trömner sign (% positive)2/13 (15%)13/99 (13%).82
HIV
 Time since diagnosis, y0.96 (0.01–6.09)1.09 (0.02–5.25).85
 Treatment (% yes)7/12 (58%)56/98 (57%).94
 Forget treatment (% yes)3/6 (50%)33/47 (70%).32
 Previous opportunistic infection (% yes)3/11 (27%)29/83 (35%).61
Laboratory findings (blood)
 Leukocytes/mm36580 (3570–7840)5430 (3700–7880).65
 Lymphocytes/mm3580 (285–855)810 (470–1520).13
 Hematocrit (%)35.2 (31.1–36)31.2 (26.1–34).03
 CD4 cells/mm3d,e52 (20–140)141 (40–280).18
 CD8 cells/mm3e68 (51–920)87.5 (50–132).26
 Ratio CD4/CD80.08 (0.04–0.13)0.16 (0.06–0.3).17
 Log Viral Load/mm310.8 (8.2–11.7)10.7 (5.8–12.6).92
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)11/11 (100%)96/96 (100%)
Clinical outcomes
 Treatment with AmB + FCZ (% yes)6/13 (46%)28/103 (27%).15
 Survival at 6 mo (% living)4/9 (44%)40/87 (46%).93
Cryptococcus
Positive (n = 13)Negative (n = 103)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P Valuea
Demographics
 Age, y36 (32–41)35 (29–44).88
 Sex (% male)12/13 (92%)79/102 (77%).21
 Years of education10 (8–11)9 (7–12).93
 Location (% urban)8/12 (67%)56/100 (56%).48
 Animals (% yes)9/12 (75%)69/98 (70%).89
Symptoms
 Weight loss (% yes)13/13 (100%)91/101 (90%).60
 Fever and chills (% yes)9/13 (69%)83/101 (82%).27
 Night sweats (% yes)4/13 (31%)61/97 (63%).03
 Seizures (% yes)5/12 (42%)24/95 (25%).23
 Headache (% yes)13/13 (100%)85/100 (85%).21
 Neck stiffness (% yes)4/12 (33%)17/92 (19%).23
 Photophobia (% yes)7/13 (54%)25/100 (25%).03
Neurological exam findings
 GCS score14 (11–15)14 (13–15).98
 GCS score binary (% <15)7/13 (54%)55/102 (54%)1.00
 MMSE (total score)b15 (9–27.5)20 (9–28).74
 IHIVDSc9 (8–9)9 (4–9).32
 Gait abnormalities (% yes)0/4 (0%)15/41 (37%).29
 Romberg sign (% positive)2/4 (50%)10/37 (27%).34
 Alternating movement test (% abnormal)1/6 (17%)14/62 (23%).74
 Nose to finger (% abnormal)2/7 (28%)14/64 (22%).69
 Diminished global strength (% positive)5/10 (50%)44/81 (54%).80
 Focal sensory signs (unilateral)0/12 (0%)28/98 (29%).03
 Focal motor signs (unilateral)2/13 (15%)45/97 (46%).03
 Babinski reflex (% positive)5/13 (38%)44/99 (44%).68
 Trömner sign (% positive)2/13 (15%)13/99 (13%).82
HIV
 Time since diagnosis, y0.96 (0.01–6.09)1.09 (0.02–5.25).85
 Treatment (% yes)7/12 (58%)56/98 (57%).94
 Forget treatment (% yes)3/6 (50%)33/47 (70%).32
 Previous opportunistic infection (% yes)3/11 (27%)29/83 (35%).61
Laboratory findings (blood)
 Leukocytes/mm36580 (3570–7840)5430 (3700–7880).65
 Lymphocytes/mm3580 (285–855)810 (470–1520).13
 Hematocrit (%)35.2 (31.1–36)31.2 (26.1–34).03
 CD4 cells/mm3d,e52 (20–140)141 (40–280).18
 CD8 cells/mm3e68 (51–920)87.5 (50–132).26
 Ratio CD4/CD80.08 (0.04–0.13)0.16 (0.06–0.3).17
 Log Viral Load/mm310.8 (8.2–11.7)10.7 (5.8–12.6).92
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)11/11 (100%)96/96 (100%)
Clinical outcomes
 Treatment with AmB + FCZ (% yes)6/13 (46%)28/103 (27%).15
 Survival at 6 mo (% living)4/9 (44%)40/87 (46%).93

Significant Values in bold. Abbreviations: AmB, Amphotericin B; FCZ, Fluconazole; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IHIVDS, International HIV Dementia Scale; IQR, interquartile range; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination.

aP values were calculated with χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for numerical variables.

bNormal MMSE >25.

cNormal IHIVDS >10.

dOnly individuals with a CD4 count in the last year were included in the analysis.

eRegression analysis completed using CD4 cells/mm3/100 cells/mm3 and CD8 cells/mm3/100 cells/mm3.

Eighty-two participants (70%) with CrAg results underwent CT scan, including 9 with cryptococcal meningitis, of whom 4 were classified as probable, 1 as possible, and 4 less likely cases of cryptococcal meningitis (Supplementary Table 5). Of 74 CrAg-negative participants, 7 were classified as probable, 8 possible, and 2 less likely to have cryptococcal meningitis. The presence of lesions on head CT was associated with decreased likelihood of cryptococcal infection (PR, 0.19 [95% CI, .04–.88]).

Of 114 participants (81%) with survival data available at 6 months, 53 (46%) were alive (Table 5). Participants who died had fewer years of education (P = .01). Survival was not associated with diagnosis with cerebral toxoplasmosis or cryptococcal meningitis. Lower CD4 count (P = .005), higher VL (P = .05), and oral thrush (P < .001) were associated with increased risk of death, as was lower hematocrit level (P < .001). Abnormal GCS score (P < .001), lower Mini-Mental State Examination score (P < .001), positive Babinski reflex (P = .02), and positive Trömner sign (P = .01) were associated with higher mortality. Data missingness was equal between groups except in sections of the neurological examination that required active participation, where participants who died had higher rates of missing data. Supplementary Table 6 compares head CTs based on survival; only increased number of lesions was associated with increased mortality (P = .03).

Table 5.

Demographic and Clinical Factors of Live and Dead Patients

Survival
Alive (n = 53)Dead (n = 61)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P Valuea
Demographics
 Age, y34 (29–39)34 (28–43).97
 Sex (% male)40/52 (77%)50/60 (83%).39
 Years of education11 (8–12)9 (6–11).01
 Location (% urban)29/52 (56%)34/59 (58%).84
Diagnosis and treatment
 qPCR in for CSF Toxoplasma gondii (% positive)10/43 (23%)15/53 (28%).58
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)53/53 (100%)58/59 (95%)1.00
 CrAg for Cryptococcus (% positive)4/44 (9%)5/52 (10%).93
 Treatment with TMP-SMX (% yes)43/51 (81%)53/61 (86%).40
 Treatment with AmB + FCZ (% yes)7/53 (13%)21/61 (34%).01
Symptoms
 Weight loss (% yes)44/51 (86%)57/60 (95%).11
 Fever and chills (% yes)38/51 (75%)50/60 (83%).25
 Night sweats (% yes)25/51 (49%)38/55 (69%).04
 Seizures (% yes)11/51 (22%)20/55 (36%).09
 Headache (% yes)46/51 (90%)50/59 (85%).39
 Neck stiffness (% yes)10/47 (21%)15/52 (29%).39
 Photophobia (% yes)16/50 (32%)19/59 (32%).98
Neurological exam findings
 GCS score15 (14–15)14 (11–15)<.001
 GCS score binary (% <15)16/50 (32%)43/61 (71%)<.001
 MMSE (total score)b26 (14–29)11.5 (9–20)<.001
 IHIVDSc8 (3.5–9.5)9 (4–9).85
 Gait abnormalities (% yes)12/29 (41%)3/10 (30%).52
 Romberg sign (% positive)8/28 (29%)1/8 (13%).36
 Alternating movement test (% abnormal)6/38 (16%)5/25 (20%).67
 Nose to finger (% abnormal)6/38 (16%)7/28 (25%).35
 Diminished global strength (% positive)24/45 (53%)25/43 (58%).65
 Focal sensory signs (unilateral)13/50 (26%)17/58 (29%).70
 Focal motor signs (unilateral)23/49 (47%)27/57 (47%).97
 Babinski reflex (% positive)16/49 (33%)33/59 (56%).02
 Trömner sign (% positive)2/49 (4%)13/59 (22%).01
HIV
 Time since diagnosis, y2.3 (0.05–6.7)1.95 (0.04–6.6).78
 Treatment (% yes)30/51 (59%)31/61 (51%).35
 Forget treatment (% yes)19/27 (70%)18/23 (78%).53
 Previous opportunistic infection (% yes)15/41 (37%)14/46 (30%).54
Laboratory findings (blood)
 Leukocytes/mm35325 (4090–7060)4775 (2950–7535).43
 Lymphocytes/mm3895 (675–1525)590 (410–1290).11
 Hematocrit (%)33.4 (31–36)29.3 (25.2–33.1)<.001
 CD4 cells/mm3  d,e190 (50–350)60 (30–140).01
 CD8 cells/mm3e87 (65–124)75 (45–113).29
 Ratio CD4/CD80.2 (0.07–0.3)0.1 (0.04–0.3).63
 Log Viral Load/mm39.6 (4.4–11.8)11 (8.5–12.7).05
Survival
Alive (n = 53)Dead (n = 61)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P Valuea
Demographics
 Age, y34 (29–39)34 (28–43).97
 Sex (% male)40/52 (77%)50/60 (83%).39
 Years of education11 (8–12)9 (6–11).01
 Location (% urban)29/52 (56%)34/59 (58%).84
Diagnosis and treatment
 qPCR in for CSF Toxoplasma gondii (% positive)10/43 (23%)15/53 (28%).58
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)53/53 (100%)58/59 (95%)1.00
 CrAg for Cryptococcus (% positive)4/44 (9%)5/52 (10%).93
 Treatment with TMP-SMX (% yes)43/51 (81%)53/61 (86%).40
 Treatment with AmB + FCZ (% yes)7/53 (13%)21/61 (34%).01
Symptoms
 Weight loss (% yes)44/51 (86%)57/60 (95%).11
 Fever and chills (% yes)38/51 (75%)50/60 (83%).25
 Night sweats (% yes)25/51 (49%)38/55 (69%).04
 Seizures (% yes)11/51 (22%)20/55 (36%).09
 Headache (% yes)46/51 (90%)50/59 (85%).39
 Neck stiffness (% yes)10/47 (21%)15/52 (29%).39
 Photophobia (% yes)16/50 (32%)19/59 (32%).98
Neurological exam findings
 GCS score15 (14–15)14 (11–15)<.001
 GCS score binary (% <15)16/50 (32%)43/61 (71%)<.001
 MMSE (total score)b26 (14–29)11.5 (9–20)<.001
 IHIVDSc8 (3.5–9.5)9 (4–9).85
 Gait abnormalities (% yes)12/29 (41%)3/10 (30%).52
 Romberg sign (% positive)8/28 (29%)1/8 (13%).36
 Alternating movement test (% abnormal)6/38 (16%)5/25 (20%).67
 Nose to finger (% abnormal)6/38 (16%)7/28 (25%).35
 Diminished global strength (% positive)24/45 (53%)25/43 (58%).65
 Focal sensory signs (unilateral)13/50 (26%)17/58 (29%).70
 Focal motor signs (unilateral)23/49 (47%)27/57 (47%).97
 Babinski reflex (% positive)16/49 (33%)33/59 (56%).02
 Trömner sign (% positive)2/49 (4%)13/59 (22%).01
HIV
 Time since diagnosis, y2.3 (0.05–6.7)1.95 (0.04–6.6).78
 Treatment (% yes)30/51 (59%)31/61 (51%).35
 Forget treatment (% yes)19/27 (70%)18/23 (78%).53
 Previous opportunistic infection (% yes)15/41 (37%)14/46 (30%).54
Laboratory findings (blood)
 Leukocytes/mm35325 (4090–7060)4775 (2950–7535).43
 Lymphocytes/mm3895 (675–1525)590 (410–1290).11
 Hematocrit (%)33.4 (31–36)29.3 (25.2–33.1)<.001
 CD4 cells/mm3  d,e190 (50–350)60 (30–140).01
 CD8 cells/mm3e87 (65–124)75 (45–113).29
 Ratio CD4/CD80.2 (0.07–0.3)0.1 (0.04–0.3).63
 Log Viral Load/mm39.6 (4.4–11.8)11 (8.5–12.7).05

Significant Values in bold. Abbreviations: AmB, Amphotericin B; CrAg, cryptococcal antigen; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; FCZ, Fluconazole; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IHIVDS, International HIV Dementia Scale; IQR, interquartile range; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

aP values were calculated with χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for numerical variables.

bNormal MMSE >25.

cNormal IHIVDS >10.

dOnly individuals with a CD4 count in the last year were included in the analysis.

eRegression analysis completed using CD4 cells/mm3/100 cells/mm3 and CD8 cells/mm3/100 cells/mm3.

Table 5.

Demographic and Clinical Factors of Live and Dead Patients

Survival
Alive (n = 53)Dead (n = 61)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P Valuea
Demographics
 Age, y34 (29–39)34 (28–43).97
 Sex (% male)40/52 (77%)50/60 (83%).39
 Years of education11 (8–12)9 (6–11).01
 Location (% urban)29/52 (56%)34/59 (58%).84
Diagnosis and treatment
 qPCR in for CSF Toxoplasma gondii (% positive)10/43 (23%)15/53 (28%).58
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)53/53 (100%)58/59 (95%)1.00
 CrAg for Cryptococcus (% positive)4/44 (9%)5/52 (10%).93
 Treatment with TMP-SMX (% yes)43/51 (81%)53/61 (86%).40
 Treatment with AmB + FCZ (% yes)7/53 (13%)21/61 (34%).01
Symptoms
 Weight loss (% yes)44/51 (86%)57/60 (95%).11
 Fever and chills (% yes)38/51 (75%)50/60 (83%).25
 Night sweats (% yes)25/51 (49%)38/55 (69%).04
 Seizures (% yes)11/51 (22%)20/55 (36%).09
 Headache (% yes)46/51 (90%)50/59 (85%).39
 Neck stiffness (% yes)10/47 (21%)15/52 (29%).39
 Photophobia (% yes)16/50 (32%)19/59 (32%).98
Neurological exam findings
 GCS score15 (14–15)14 (11–15)<.001
 GCS score binary (% <15)16/50 (32%)43/61 (71%)<.001
 MMSE (total score)b26 (14–29)11.5 (9–20)<.001
 IHIVDSc8 (3.5–9.5)9 (4–9).85
 Gait abnormalities (% yes)12/29 (41%)3/10 (30%).52
 Romberg sign (% positive)8/28 (29%)1/8 (13%).36
 Alternating movement test (% abnormal)6/38 (16%)5/25 (20%).67
 Nose to finger (% abnormal)6/38 (16%)7/28 (25%).35
 Diminished global strength (% positive)24/45 (53%)25/43 (58%).65
 Focal sensory signs (unilateral)13/50 (26%)17/58 (29%).70
 Focal motor signs (unilateral)23/49 (47%)27/57 (47%).97
 Babinski reflex (% positive)16/49 (33%)33/59 (56%).02
 Trömner sign (% positive)2/49 (4%)13/59 (22%).01
HIV
 Time since diagnosis, y2.3 (0.05–6.7)1.95 (0.04–6.6).78
 Treatment (% yes)30/51 (59%)31/61 (51%).35
 Forget treatment (% yes)19/27 (70%)18/23 (78%).53
 Previous opportunistic infection (% yes)15/41 (37%)14/46 (30%).54
Laboratory findings (blood)
 Leukocytes/mm35325 (4090–7060)4775 (2950–7535).43
 Lymphocytes/mm3895 (675–1525)590 (410–1290).11
 Hematocrit (%)33.4 (31–36)29.3 (25.2–33.1)<.001
 CD4 cells/mm3  d,e190 (50–350)60 (30–140).01
 CD8 cells/mm3e87 (65–124)75 (45–113).29
 Ratio CD4/CD80.2 (0.07–0.3)0.1 (0.04–0.3).63
 Log Viral Load/mm39.6 (4.4–11.8)11 (8.5–12.7).05
Survival
Alive (n = 53)Dead (n = 61)
Characteristicno./No. (%) or Median (IQR)no./No. (%) or Median (IQR)P Valuea
Demographics
 Age, y34 (29–39)34 (28–43).97
 Sex (% male)40/52 (77%)50/60 (83%).39
 Years of education11 (8–12)9 (6–11).01
 Location (% urban)29/52 (56%)34/59 (58%).84
Diagnosis and treatment
 qPCR in for CSF Toxoplasma gondii (% positive)10/43 (23%)15/53 (28%).58
 Toxoplasmosis serology (% positive)53/53 (100%)58/59 (95%)1.00
 CrAg for Cryptococcus (% positive)4/44 (9%)5/52 (10%).93
 Treatment with TMP-SMX (% yes)43/51 (81%)53/61 (86%).40
 Treatment with AmB + FCZ (% yes)7/53 (13%)21/61 (34%).01
Symptoms
 Weight loss (% yes)44/51 (86%)57/60 (95%).11
 Fever and chills (% yes)38/51 (75%)50/60 (83%).25
 Night sweats (% yes)25/51 (49%)38/55 (69%).04
 Seizures (% yes)11/51 (22%)20/55 (36%).09
 Headache (% yes)46/51 (90%)50/59 (85%).39
 Neck stiffness (% yes)10/47 (21%)15/52 (29%).39
 Photophobia (% yes)16/50 (32%)19/59 (32%).98
Neurological exam findings
 GCS score15 (14–15)14 (11–15)<.001
 GCS score binary (% <15)16/50 (32%)43/61 (71%)<.001
 MMSE (total score)b26 (14–29)11.5 (9–20)<.001
 IHIVDSc8 (3.5–9.5)9 (4–9).85
 Gait abnormalities (% yes)12/29 (41%)3/10 (30%).52
 Romberg sign (% positive)8/28 (29%)1/8 (13%).36
 Alternating movement test (% abnormal)6/38 (16%)5/25 (20%).67
 Nose to finger (% abnormal)6/38 (16%)7/28 (25%).35
 Diminished global strength (% positive)24/45 (53%)25/43 (58%).65
 Focal sensory signs (unilateral)13/50 (26%)17/58 (29%).70
 Focal motor signs (unilateral)23/49 (47%)27/57 (47%).97
 Babinski reflex (% positive)16/49 (33%)33/59 (56%).02
 Trömner sign (% positive)2/49 (4%)13/59 (22%).01
HIV
 Time since diagnosis, y2.3 (0.05–6.7)1.95 (0.04–6.6).78
 Treatment (% yes)30/51 (59%)31/61 (51%).35
 Forget treatment (% yes)19/27 (70%)18/23 (78%).53
 Previous opportunistic infection (% yes)15/41 (37%)14/46 (30%).54
Laboratory findings (blood)
 Leukocytes/mm35325 (4090–7060)4775 (2950–7535).43
 Lymphocytes/mm3895 (675–1525)590 (410–1290).11
 Hematocrit (%)33.4 (31–36)29.3 (25.2–33.1)<.001
 CD4 cells/mm3  d,e190 (50–350)60 (30–140).01
 CD8 cells/mm3e87 (65–124)75 (45–113).29
 Ratio CD4/CD80.2 (0.07–0.3)0.1 (0.04–0.3).63
 Log Viral Load/mm39.6 (4.4–11.8)11 (8.5–12.7).05

Significant Values in bold. Abbreviations: AmB, Amphotericin B; CrAg, cryptococcal antigen; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; FCZ, Fluconazole; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IHIVDS, International HIV Dementia Scale; IQR, interquartile range; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

aP values were calculated with χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for numerical variables.

bNormal MMSE >25.

cNormal IHIVDS >10.

dOnly individuals with a CD4 count in the last year were included in the analysis.

eRegression analysis completed using CD4 cells/mm3/100 cells/mm3 and CD8 cells/mm3/100 cells/mm3.

Toxoplasma gondii qPCR and CrAg-LFA provided a diagnosis for only 39 (28%) participants. To evaluate diagnostic performance and investigate other potential causes of neurological infection, mNGS was performed on CSF from 42 participants with sufficient remaining volume after diagnostic testing. Average sequencing depth was 1 278 118 reads for RNA-seq and 5 954 261 reads for DNA-seq. Of these 42, 8 were diagnosed with T gondii by qPCR and 6 with cryptococcal meningitis by CrAg; 28 had no diagnosis. mNGS identified potential infectious etiologies in 48% (n = 22) of the tested population, including the following organisms: T gondii (n = 8), C neoformans (n = 7), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (n = 5). Additionally, mNGS detected likely nonpathogenic viruses—hepatitis B virus (HBV; n = 1) and pegivirus (n = 1).

mNGS detected T gondii sequences in 5 of the 7 T gondii qPCR-positive samples and in an additional 3 qPCR-negative samples. Head CT findings were suggestive of possible cerebral toxoplasmosis in 1 of 3 discordant participants. There was a negative correlation between toxoplasmosis qPCR Ct and the number of mNGS reads mapping to T gondii (Figure 3A). Positive percentage agreement between T gondii qPCR and mNGS was 71.4% (95% CI, 29%–96.3%) and negative percentage agreement was 91.4% (95% CI, 76.9%–98.2%) (Table 6). Reanalysis of clinical covariates after inclusion of mNGS T gondii–positive participants did not change findings (data not shown).

Relationship between metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and known clinical measures of disease. A, Comparison of mNGS reads per million for Toxoplasma gondii to T gondii quantitative polymerase chain reaction cycle threshold in cerebrospinal fluid. B, Comparison of mNGS reads per million for Cryptococcus neoformans to cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay (CrAg-LFA) results. C, Analysis of area under the curve for mNGS as compared to CrAg-LFA results. Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; CrAg, cryptococcal antigen; LFA, lateral flow assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; rPM, reads Per Million.
Figure 3.

Relationship between metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and known clinical measures of disease. A, Comparison of mNGS reads per million for Toxoplasma gondii to T gondii quantitative polymerase chain reaction cycle threshold in cerebrospinal fluid. B, Comparison of mNGS reads per million for Cryptococcus neoformans to cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay (CrAg-LFA) results. C, Analysis of area under the curve for mNGS as compared to CrAg-LFA results. Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; CrAg, cryptococcal antigen; LFA, lateral flow assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; rPM, reads Per Million.

Table 6.

Diagnostic Agreement of Toxoplasma gondii Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction and Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing

qPCR
AssayPositiveNegativeTotal
mNGSPositive538
Negative23234
Total73542
Probability (95% CI)
 Positive percentage agreement71.4% (29%–96.3%)
 Negative percentage agreement91.4% (76.9%–98.2%)
qPCR
AssayPositiveNegativeTotal
mNGSPositive538
Negative23234
Total73542
Probability (95% CI)
 Positive percentage agreement71.4% (29%–96.3%)
 Negative percentage agreement91.4% (76.9%–98.2%)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Table 6.

Diagnostic Agreement of Toxoplasma gondii Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction and Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing

qPCR
AssayPositiveNegativeTotal
mNGSPositive538
Negative23234
Total73542
Probability (95% CI)
 Positive percentage agreement71.4% (29%–96.3%)
 Negative percentage agreement91.4% (76.9%–98.2%)
qPCR
AssayPositiveNegativeTotal
mNGSPositive538
Negative23234
Total73542
Probability (95% CI)
 Positive percentage agreement71.4% (29%–96.3%)
 Negative percentage agreement91.4% (76.9%–98.2%)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Of 9 CrAg-LFA positive samples sequenced, mNGS detected C neoformans sequences in 7 (78%). The 2 CrAg-LFA positive, mNGS-negative samples had head CTs consistent with meningitis. Comparison of mNGS results to CrAg-LFA reveal an area under the curve of 0.89 (95% CI, .745–1), sensitivity of 78% (95% CI, 40%–97%), and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 88%–99.9%) (Table 7, Figure 3B and 3C). One sample that contained high abundance of C neoformans sequences by mNGS was initially negative by CrAg-LFA; subsequently, the specimen was serially diluted and retested by CrAg-LFA with a positive result. CrAg-LFA has a known prozone effect (where high antigen concentration impedes antibody sandwich formation in 1-step immunoassays), and the test manual suggests that users serially dilute specimens when high antigen concentration is suspected [13, 14].

Table 7.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Cerebrospinal Fluid Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Versus Cryptococcal Antigen Lateral Flow Assay

CrAg (Serum or CSF)
AssayPositiveNegativeTotal
CSF mNGSPositive707
Negative23030
Total93039
Probability (95% CI)
 Area under the curve0.89 (.745–1)
 Sensitivity78% (40%–97%)
 Specificity100% (88%–99.9%)
CrAg (Serum or CSF)
AssayPositiveNegativeTotal
CSF mNGSPositive707
Negative23030
Total93039
Probability (95% CI)
 Area under the curve0.89 (.745–1)
 Sensitivity78% (40%–97%)
 Specificity100% (88%–99.9%)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CrAg, cryptococcal antigen; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing.

Table 7.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Cerebrospinal Fluid Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Versus Cryptococcal Antigen Lateral Flow Assay

CrAg (Serum or CSF)
AssayPositiveNegativeTotal
CSF mNGSPositive707
Negative23030
Total93039
Probability (95% CI)
 Area under the curve0.89 (.745–1)
 Sensitivity78% (40%–97%)
 Specificity100% (88%–99.9%)
CrAg (Serum or CSF)
AssayPositiveNegativeTotal
CSF mNGSPositive707
Negative23030
Total93039
Probability (95% CI)
 Area under the curve0.89 (.745–1)
 Sensitivity78% (40%–97%)
 Specificity100% (88%–99.9%)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CrAg, cryptococcal antigen; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing.

mNGS identified M tuberculosis sequences in 5 participants’ CSF. Noncontrast head CTs were available for 4 of these participants, and none of the CT reports suggested tuberculous meningitis (TBM) as a likely diagnosis. Two participants with suspected tuberculosis (TB) had no respiratory symptoms or examination findings, history of TB, or known TB contacts. Three participants reported nonbloody productive cough for >2 weeks. Three of 5 participants with TB detected by mNGS had a presumptive diagnosis of TBM and were treated; 2 survived.

One sample with TB also contained HBV DNA, and 1 sample contained pegivirus RNA. Pegiviruses (Flaviviridae) are usually considered nonpathogenic to humans, and HBV detection was likely unrelated to the participant's neurologic condition and may represent contamination with peripheral blood [15]. The participants with HBV and pegivirus had normal abdominal examinations and no scleral icterus. Nine samples contained Epstein-Barr virus and 2 contained cytomegalovirus. The average rPM was 0.7. None of the cases met the predefined threshold to be considered a potential pathogen.

DISCUSSION

We describe clinical features of PWH presenting with acute neurological conditions from Iquitos, Peru, focusing on cerebral toxoplasmosis and cryptococcal meningitis. We further show that mNGS has potential to increase diagnostic yield of these infections as well as identify other, sometimes unanticipated, pathogens.

Prevalence of cerebral toxoplasmosis in this population was 24% by CSF qPCR. Though not classified as cases in our analyses, 3 additional participants were diagnosed with cerebral toxoplasmosis by CSF mNGS, bringing prevalence to 26%. These results corroborate other studies of PWH conducted in the Amazon region [16, 17], where T gondii seroprevalence is very high (97% in this study). As in other studies, participants with cerebral toxoplasmosis in this study generally had nonspecific presentations, including unilateral focal motor signs and positive Babinski reflex [1, 18, 19]. Almost all (17/18) T gondii qPCR-positive patients who underwent head CT had focal lesions. The direct correlation between number of lesions on head CT and parasite load suggests that intracranial lesions are associated with more severe disease. Several participants with negative qPCR had head CT findings suspicious for toxoplasmosis. However, the suboptimal head CT conditions (majority lacked contrast and follow-up CT for signs of clinical improvement after initiation of treatment) led us to include a CT result as supportive of a diagnosis but not as a diagnostic criterion itself.

The prevalence of cryptococcal meningitis was 11% in our study, slightly higher than in other reports, though studies from the Amazon region are lacking [20–22]. All 13 participants with cryptococcal meningitis reported headache and weight loss, and most reported photophobia. Headache and photophobia are common symptoms of cryptococcal meningitis; weight loss, however, is less frequently identified but may reflect advanced HIV [1, 23]. This study defined participants who were CrAg positive in CSF and/or serum as probable cases of cryptococcal meningitis. This decision was based on our internal data demonstrating a κ = 1 between serum and CSF CrAg in participants who received both assays and on prior work from Williams et al, which revealed that 93% of serum CrAg-positive patients also had a positive CSF CrAg assay [24].

Six-month mortality in this population was very high at 54%. Forty percent of study participants were diagnosed with HIV within the 3 months prior to enrollment with low CD4 counts (median CD4 count of 119 cells/mm3), which likely was a key factor in the high mortality. Previous work in Loreto has shown high rates of discrimination against PWH and misconceptions about HIV, creating barriers to testing, care, and treatment adherence [25]. Though 52% of participants were on ARVs, a third of those forgot to take their medication ≥3 times per week.

PWH are susceptible to (and frequently coinfected with) many organisms, so techniques that allow simultaneous testing for multiple pathogens offer an attractive alternative to multiple assays for individual pathogens. Multiplex PCR technology and next-generation sequencing both represent great advancements for this purpose. The commercially available BioFire assay shows great promise as a multiplex assay but is limited by the available targeted organisms (which currently only include 1 parasitic infection). However, it has equipment that is relatively portable. mNGS resolves the limitation of a priori pathogen selection but is not portable. Our comparison of mNGS to T gondii qPCR and CrAg demonstrated that although mNGS is helpful to diagnose central nervous system OIs, it can be less sensitive than optimized pathogen-specific techniques, especially for pathogens at low abundance in CSF [26, 27]. However, limited sensitivity of T gondii qPCR confounds estimates of mNGS performance to diagnose cerebral toxoplasmosis; indeed, mNGS identified 3 additional possible cerebral toxoplasmosis cases that were qPCR negative. Because of T gondii qPCR's limited sensitivity, we reported percentage agreement with mNGS instead of sensitivity and specificity. However, the CrAg assay has excellent sensitivity and can serve as a gold standard to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of mNGS for cryptococcal meningitis. While the CrAg-LFA is reported to have 100% sensitivity and specificity, a prozone phenomenon has been reported [28], as we documented in 1 sample in our study. Finally, mNGS identified TB DNA in 5 participants, only 3 of whom had been treated for TBM, highlighting its ability to identify unsuspected infections [11]. mNGS may be useful in TB-endemic regions, as qPCR and even GeneXpert have limited sensitivity in CSF, and culture can take weeks. The identification of HBV and pegivirus sequences in 2 samples demonstrate the ability of mNGS to identify infections incidental to a patient's neurological presentation and the need for clinical adjudication [29].

This study had several limitations. Sample size limited our power to detect risk factors for infection with T gondii and C neoformans. CSF was not obtained from all patients due to mass lesions, patient/physician preference, or early death, and sufficient CSF was only available to perform mNGS on a subset of samples. Basic data about the CSF were not available (cells, opening pressure). Toxoplasma gondii qPCR has limited sensitivity (35%–70%) but is the best available nonsurgical test; it is probable that more patients in our cohort had cerebral toxoplasmosis, including those identified by mNGS [4–6]. Because of CrAg-LFA supply chain challenges, the first 86 participants were tested retrospectively for C neoformans using stored samples that may have degraded over time. Head CTs were only available for 43% of participants, and only 16% of those were performed with intravenous contrast; in some cases, this was due to medical contraindications but more frequently to lack of contrast at the study site. Additionally, we could not use change in CT findings to diagnose cerebral toxoplasmosis because only 8 posttreatment CTs were obtained. Mortality data were obtained through retrospective chart review 6 months after study completion, and dates of death were not available. Detailed information about treatment dose and duration for both infections was unavailable, preventing evaluation of prophylaxis or treatment on outcomes.

Despite these limitations, this study offers insight into the epidemiology and clinical features of common neurological OIs and into shortcomings of diagnostic tests. Both cerebral toxoplasmosis and latent infection were highly prevalent in our study population. The nonspecific presentation of cerebral toxoplasmosis, imperfect sensitivity of available laboratory assays, and limited availability of biopsy underscore the need for improved diagnostic testing. While CrAg-LFA performs much better than toxoplasmosis diagnostics, our mNGS results revealed limitations to this test as well. Our exploration of a genomic avenue for diagnosis yielded hopeful results that call for further development. Unfortunately, even if these novel techniques achieve the necessary sensitivity and specificity, access to and expertise in nontargeted sequencing techniques is currently limited in resource-limited areas. Thus, ideal next steps are improvements in access to point-of-care testing and treatment, for both HIV and their associated OIs, to decrease the burden of disease and high mortality.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.

Notes

Acknowledgments. The Toxoplasmosis Working Group in Peru: Catherine Apaza, Melanie Ayachi, Oliver A. Bocanegra, Jeroen Bok, Linda Chanamé Pinedo, Marilly Donayre Urquizo, Renzo Gutierrez-Loli, Gaston Pinedo, Grace Trompeter, Sory Vazquez, and Deanna Zhu.

Author contributions. H. E. S., C. F., M. S., and N. M. B. contributed to the statistical analysis. P. S. R., A. W., K. C. Z., and M. R. W. contributed to the next-generation sequencing and analysis. M. M. D. read all computed tomography scans. A. D. and M. C. completed all of the T gondii qPCR assays. L. P., A. D., and M. C. completed all the CrAg-LFAs. H. E. S., L. P., D. E. K., L. C., V. P.-C., C. R. A., R. H. G., and N. M. B. all assisted with study management, patient recruitment, and/or specimen processing. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript.

Financial support. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant/award numbers K23 AI113197 to N. M. B., D43TW009340 to H. E. S., and R01Al136722-01A1 and D43TW010074-04 to R. H. G.); Innóvate Peru (grant number 137-PNICP-PIAP-2015 to M. C.); the Burroughs-Wellcome Fund/American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Postdoctoral Fellowship in Tropical Infectious Diseases (to N. M. B.); Neurology Clinical Research Training Scholarship (award number P0534134 to P. S. R.); Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship (to P. S. R.); Westridge Foundation (to M. R. W.); and Medical Research Council Clinical Research Training Fellowship (award number MR/P019978/2 to D. E. K.). University funding was provided to the University of North Carolina Center for AIDS Research (grant number P30 AI050410 to N. M. B.); Dean’s Biomedical Sciences Scholar Award, University of Illinois Chicago (to H. E. S.); Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (to M. C.); and National University of San Marcos (to M. C.).

References

1

Thakur
 
K
,
Boubour
 
A
,
Saylor
 
D
,
Das
 
M
,
Bearden
 
D
,
Birbeck
 
G
.
Global HIV neurology: a comprehensive review
.
AIDS
 
2019
;
33
:
163
84
.

2

Tan
 
IL
,
Smith
 
BR
,
von Geldern
 
G
,
Mateen
 
FJ
,
McArthur
 
JC
.
HIV-associated opportunistic infections of the CNS
.
Lancet Neurol
 
2012
;
11
:
605
17
.

3

Eza
 
D
,
Cerrillo
 
G
,
Moore
 
DAJ
, et al.  
Postmortem findings and opportunistic infections in HIV-positive patients from a public hospital in Peru
.
Pathol Res Pract
 
2006
;
202
:
767
75
.

4

Eggers
 
C
,
Gro
 
U
,
Klinker
 
H
,
Schalke
 
B
,
Stellbrink
 
H
,
Kunze
 
K
.
Limited value of cerebrospinal fluid for direct detection of Toxoplasma gondii in toxoplasmic encephalitis associated with AIDS
.
J Neurol
 
1995
;
242
:
644
9
.

5

Dupon
 
M
,
Cazenave
 
J
,
Pellegrin
 
J
, et al.  
Detection of Toxoplasma gondii by PCR and tissue culture in cerebrospinal fluid and blood of human immunodeficiency virus–seropositive patients
.
J Clin Microbiol
 
1995
;
33
:
2421
6
.

6

Parmley
 
SF
,
Goebel
 
FD
,
Remington
 
JS
.
Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in cerebrospinal fluid from AIDS patients by polymerase chain reaction
.
J Clin Microbiol
 
1992
;
30
:
3000
2
.

7

Jarvis
 
JN
,
Percival
 
A
,
Bauman
 
S
, et al.  
Evaluation of a novel point-of-care cryptococcal antigen test on serum, plasma, and urine from patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis
.
Clin Infect Dis
 
2011
;
53
:
1019
23
.

8

Boulware
 
DR
,
Rolfes
 
MA
,
Rajasingham
 
R
, et al.  
Multisite validation of cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay and quantification by laser thermal contrast
.
Emerg Infect Dis
 
2014
;
20
:
45
53
.

9

Wilson
 
MR
,
Sample
 
HA
,
Zorn
 
KC
, et al.  
Clinical metagenomic sequencing for diagnosis of meningitis and encephalitis
.
N Engl J Med
 
2019
;
380
:
2327
40
.

10

Ministerio de Salud del Perú
.
Análisis de la situación epidemiológica del VIH/SIDA en el Perú—2013
.
2013
. Available at: http://bvs.minsa.gob.pe/local/MINSA/2740.pdf. Accessed 22 December 2017.

11

Ramachandran
 
PS
,
Ramesh
 
A
,
Creswell
 
FV
, et al.  
Integrating central nervous system metagenomics and host response for diagnosis of tuberculosis meningitis and its mimics
.
Nat Commun
 
2022
;
13
:
1675
.

12

Kalantar
 
KL
,
Carvalho
 
T
,
de Bourcy
 
CFA
, et al.  
IDseq—an open source cloud-based pipeline and analysis service for metagenomic pathogen detection and monitoring
.
GigaScience
 
2020
;
9
:
giaa111
.

13

Jacobs
 
JFM
,
van der Molen
 
RG
,
Bossuyt
 
X
,
Damoiseaux
 
J
.
Antigen excess in modern immunoassays: to anticipate on the unexpected
.
Autoimmun Rev
 
2014
;
14
:
160
7
.

14

IMMY
.
CrAg LFA. Cryptococcal antigen.
 
2019
. Available at: https://www.immy.com/crag. Accessed 14 May 2019..

15

Bailey
 
AL
,
Buechler
 
CR
,
Matson
 
DR
, et al.  
Pegivirus avoids immune recognition but does not attenuate acute-phase disease in a macaque model of HIV infection
.
PLoS Pathog
 
2017
;
13
:
e1006692
.

16

Telles
 
JP
,
Fernandes
 
R
,
Barros
 
TD
, et al.  
Neurological manifestations in people living with HIV/AIDS in the late cART era: a prospective observational study at a tertiary healthcare center in São Paulo, Brazil
.
HIV Res Clin Prac
 
2021
;
22
:
87
95
.

17

Nacher
 
M
,
Adenis
 
A
,
Guarmit
 
B
, et al.  
What is AIDS in the Amazon and the Guianas in the 90-90-90 era?
 
PLoS One
 
2020
;
15
:
e0236368
.

18

Porter
 
SB
,
Sande
 
MA
.
Toxoplasmosis of the central nervous system in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
.
N Engl J Med
 
1992
;
327
:
1643
8
.

19

Luma
 
HN
,
Tchaleu
 
BCN
,
Temfack
 
E
, et al.  
HIV-associated central nervous system disease in patients admitted at the Douala general hospital between 2004 and 2009: a retrospective study
.
AIDS Res Treat
 
2013
;
2013
:
709810
.

20

Park
 
BJ
,
Wannemuehler
 
KA
,
Marston
 
BJ
,
Govender
 
N
,
Pappas
 
PG
,
Chiller
 
TM
.
Estimation of the current global burden of cryptococcal meningitis among persons living with HIV/AIDS
.
AIDS
 
2009
;
23
:
525
30
.

21

Rajasingham
 
R
,
Smith
 
RM
,
Park
 
BJ
, et al.  
Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis
.
Lancet Infect Dis
 
2017
;
17
:
873
81
.

22

Meya
 
DB
,
Manabe
 
YC
,
Castelnuovo
 
B
, et al.  
Cost-effectiveness of serum cryptococcal antigen screening to prevent deaths among HIV-infected persons with a CD4+ cell count ≤100 cells/microL who start HIV therapy in resource-limited settings
.
Clin Infect Dis
 
2010
;
51
:
448
55
.

23

Cryptococcus neoformans var neoformans and gattii and Trichosporon species
.
Am Med Assoc
 
1999
;
281
:
1342
3
.

24

Williams
 
DA
,
Kiiza
 
T
,
Kwizera
 
R
, et al.  
Evaluation of fingerstick cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay in HIV-infected persons: a diagnostic accuracy study
.
Clin Infect Dis
 
2015
;
61
:
464
7
.

25

Tattsbridge
 
J
,
Wiskin
 
C
,
de Wildt
 
G
,
Clavé Llavall
 
A
,
Ramal-Asayag
 
C
.
HIV Understanding, experiences and perceptions of HIV-positive men who have sex with men in Amazonian Peru: a qualitative study
.
BMC Public Health
 
2020
;
20
:
728
.

26

Saha
 
S
,
Ramesh
 
A
,
Kalantar
 
K
, et al.  
Unbiased metagenomic sequencing for pediatric meningitis in Bangladesh reveals neuroinvasive chikungunya virus outbreak and other unrealized pathogens
.
mBio
 
2019
;
10
:
e02877-19
.

27

Miller
 
S
,
Naccache
 
SN
,
Samayoa
 
E
, et al.  
Laboratory validation of a clinical metagenomic sequencing assay for pathogen detection in cerebrospinal fluid
.
Genome Res
 
2019
;
29
:
831
42
.

28

Rutakingirwa
 
MK
,
Kiiza
 
TK
,
Rhein
 
J
.
“False negative” CSF cryptococcal antigen with clinical meningitis: case reports and review of literature
.
Med Mycol Case Rep
 
2020
;
29
:
29
31
.

29

Wilson
 
MR
,
Tyler
 
KL
.
The current status of next-generation sequencing for diagnosis of central nervous system infections
.
JAMA Neurol
 
2022
;
79
:
1095
6
.

Author notes

Members of the Working Group are listed in the Acknowledgments.

Potential conflicts of interest. M. R. W. is a co-founder and a member of the board of directors for Delve Bio. All other authors report no potential conflicts.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Supplementary data

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.