-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Lalitagauri M Deshpande, Michael D Huband, Sarah Charbon, Mariana Castanheira, Rodrigo E Mendes, 2139. High Rates of Non-Susceptibility to Common Oral Antibiotics Among Streptococcus pneumoniae Clinical Isolates from the United States (2019-2021), Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 10, Issue Supplement_2, December 2023, ofad500.1762, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1762
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
1,038 SPN from 31 USA centers (2019-2021) were tested by CLSI broth microdilution. Isolates were from CABP (933), bloodstream infection (72), or nosocomial pneumonia (33). A selection of 119 SPN with DOX MIC of 0.25 - >8 mg/L were subjected to genome sequencing for screening of acquired TET-R genes and target site mutations, and serotyping (ST).
Most SPN isolates were susceptible (S) to OMC (99.8%; FDA), levofloxacin (LEV, 99.7%; CLSI) and tigecycline (TIG; 98.4%; FDA). Other agents had limited activity overall (penicillin 63.5%; or DOX 80.2%; or azithromycin 54.3%) with decreased S against isolates from certain US regions (Table). Only OMC (100% S), LEV (96.8% S) and TIG (96.7% S) were active against TET-NS (MIC, ≥2 mg/L) SPN. Cefpodoxime (70.5% S) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (82.0% S) had suboptimal activity against this R subset and other agent had S ≤36.1%. Isolates from the Pacific region tended to be more S than those from other regions. All TET-NS and 1 TET-S (MIC, 1 mg/L) isolates carried tet(M), and TET-NS had low S to DOX (6.6% S) and azithromycin (3.3% S). TET target site mutations were not observed. SPN belonged to 21 ST; 22F and 35B were the most common among TET-S SPN, whereas 15A, 19A, 09N, and 23A were common among TET-NS SPN.
Options recommended for the empiric treatment of outpatients with CABP show low S against SPN from the US, except against isolates from the Pacific region. Tet(M) remains the dominant R mechanism, which did not affect OMC activity but significantly altered DOX activity. These data suggest that OMC represents a potential empiric option for treating pneumonia caused by SPN in the USA, including against isolates carrying tet(M).
Lalitagauri M. Deshpande, PhD, Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support Michael D. Huband, BS, BARDA: This study has been funded in part by BARDA under Contract No. 75A50120C00001.|Entasis: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Sarah Charbon, MHS, MLS(ASCP)CM, Paratek: Grant/Research Support Mariana Castanheira, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Grant/Research Support|CorMedix: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Rodrigo E. Mendes, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support
Author notes
Session: 226. Antimicrobial Novel Agents
Saturday, October 14, 2023: 12:15 PM
- antibiotics
- doxycycline
- azithromycin
- mutation
- anthrax disease
- bacterial pneumonia
- penicillin
- adult
- amoxicillin-potassium clavulanate combination
- vitamin d-dependent calcium-binding protein
- combined modality therapy
- comorbidity
- disclosure
- genes
- lactams
- outpatients
- pneumonia
- quinolones
- serotyping
- streptococcus pneumoniae
- united states food and drug administration
- guidelines
- macrolides
- tetracycline
- levofloxacin
- nosocomial pneumonia
- moxifloxacin
- cefpodoxime
- tigecycline
- bloodstream infections
- growth differentiation factor 15
- community
- genome sequencing
- omadacycline
Comments