PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR-LIKE14 and SLENDER RICE1 Interaction Controls Seedling Growth under Salt Stress1[OPEN]

Weiping Mo,a,b Weijiang Tang,a Yanxin Du,a,b Yanjun Jing,a Qingyun Bu,c and Rongcheng Lina,b,2,3 Key Laboratory of Photobiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, China

Early seedling development and emergence from the soil are controlled by internal factors, such as phytohormone, and external factors, such as light and salt. Light provides fuel for energy production and acts as a major environmental signal that plays crucial roles in remodeling plant growth and development, as shown in the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). In darkness, Arabidopsis seedlings undergo skotomorphogenesis with rapid elongation of the hypocotyl and closed cotyledons; upon emergence from the soil, the seedlings proceed with photomorphogenesis, a process in which light inhibits hypocotyl elongation but promotes cotyledon opening (Jiao et al., 2007). In the monocot rice (Oryza sativa), the coleoptile protects the plumule, while the mesocotyl develops in the dark to push the coleoptile toward the soil surface.
Extensive studies in Arabidopsis have demonstrated that upon light activation, the bioactive (Pfr) form of phytochromes translocate into the nucleus and interact with PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTORs (PIFs), resulting in the rapid phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of PIF proteins via the 26S proteasome pathway (Shen et al., , 2008Ni et al., 2014). PIF proteins are a small subfamily of basic helixloop-helix transcription factors that accumulate in the dark and directly control the expression of thousands of target genes (Leivar and Monte, 2014;Paik et al., 2017). Loss of PIF1, PIF3, PIF4, and PIF5 leads to short hypocotyls and open cotyledons in the dark, showing that these PIFs negatively control photomorphogenesis (Leivar et al., 2008;Shin et al., 2009). Correlative evidence reveals that PIFs play essential roles in the integration of light and other signaling pathways, such as GA, ethylene, auxin, brassinosteroid, reactive oxygen species, or temperature (de Lucas et al., 2008;Feng et al., 2008;Franklin et al., 2011;Bai et al., 2012;Lee and Thomashow, 2012;Chen et al., 2013;Zhong et al., 2014;Paik et al., 2017).
Rice has three phytochrome members, phytochrome A (OsphyA), phytochrome B (OsphyB), and phytochrome C (OsphyC), which are involved in regulating seedling de-etiolation, plant architecture, and heading time (Takano et al., 2009). Six PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR-LIKE (PIL) genes, designated OsPIL11 to OsPIL16, were identified in the rice genome (Nakamura et al., 2007). Overexpression of OsPIL13/ OsPIL1 in rice promotes internode growth and confers drought tolerance, whereas overexpression of OsPIL15 represses seedling growth in the dark (Todaka et al., 2012;Zhou et al., 2014). Nevertheless, the biological function and regulatory mechanism of PILs in monocots are largely unknown.
Salt stress negatively affects many aspects of plant growth and development, particularly during seed germination and seedling growth (Park et al., 2016). Hormonal signaling pathways are involved in salt stress responses. For example, bioactive GA levels are reduced upon salt treatment, and the Arabidopsis ga1-3 mutant, which is defective in GA biosynthesis, is tolerant to salt (Achard et al., 2006). DELLA proteins (characterized by the presence of a conserved Asp-Glu-Leu-Leu-Ala motif) act as central GA signaling repressors that restrain the expression of GA-responsive genes without GA. There are five DELLA members in Arabidopsis, but only a single DELLA protein, SLEN-DER RICE1 (SLR1), in rice (Itoh et al., 2002;Locascio et al., 2013). Upon GA binding, the GIBBERELLIN IN-SENSITIVE DWARF1 (GID1) receptor interacts with SLR1, which is then recognized by the F-box protein GID2 and degraded via the 26S proteasome pathway, leading to the activation of GA responses (Itoh et al., 2002;Sasaki et al., 2003;Murase et al., 2008). Root growth of a quadruple Arabidopsis della mutant lacking GA-INSENSITIVE (GAI), REPRESSOR OF GA (RGA), RGA-LIKE1 (RGL1), and RGL2 is more sensitive to salt treatment than that of the wild type (Achard et al., 2006). However, the mechanism underlying the cross talk among GA, light, and salt in regulating plant growth remains unclear.
In this study, we show that overexpression of OsPIL14 caused an elongated mesocotyl in the dark and reduced sensitivity to NaCl-mediated inhibition of seedling growth in rice. A mutant lacking SLR1 displayed a similar response to salt stress. Strikingly, salt-promoted OsPIL14 degradation but SLR1 accumulation. OsPIL14 physically interacted with SLR1 in vitro and in vivo. OsPIL14 directly regulates downstream gene expression and SLR1 negatively regulates this process by interfering with the binding and transcriptional activity of OsPIL14. Our findings reveal that OsPIL14-SLR1 interaction integrates light and GA signals to precisely control seedling growth under salt stress.

OsPIL14 Promotes Seedling Growth in Darkness
To study the function of these OsPIL genes, we generated transgenic rice lines overexpressing OsPIL11, OsPIL12, OsPIL14, OsPIL15, and OsPIL16 fused with GFP and driven by the OsUBQ5 promoter (UBQp:O-sPIL-GFP) in the japonica cv Zhonghua 11 (cv ZH11) background (Li et al., 2019). When grown in darkness, the cv ZH11 seedlings developed only coleoptiles and  roots. Surprisingly, all of the etiolated UBQp:OsPIL-GFP transgenic lines exhibited elongated mesocotyls compared to cv ZH11 (Supplemental Fig. S1). In particular, overexpression of UBQp:OsPIL14-GFP (OsPI-L14OE, lines 5 and 22 shown) caused much longer mesocotyls than overexpression of the other OsPIL genes (Fig. 1, A-C; Supplemental Fig. S1, B and C). Based on its strong effect, we then focused on the role of OsPIL14 in this study.
The etiolated OsPIL14OE seedlings also had significantly longer primary roots but slightly shorter coleoptiles than cv ZH11 (Fig. 1, A-C). When grown under white light, however, the OsPIL14OE plants did not develop mesocotyls and were indistinguishable from the cv ZH11 wild type in terms of coleoptile and root length (Fig. 1, D and E). We also used clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/ CRISPR-associated protein9 genome editing to generate OsPIL14 mutations. In one allele (ospil14), a 375-bp fragment was deleted in the second exon of OsPIL14, resulting in the truncation of amino acids 95 to 219 (Supplemental Fig. S2). The ospil14 mutants did not produce abnormal mesocotyls but had slightly longer roots than cv ZH11 in the dark. It did not differ from cv ZH11 when grown under light (Fig. 1), likely due to functional redundancy with other OsPIL members. These observations suggest that OsPIL14 and the other OsPILs promote skotomorphogenesis and root growth in darkness.
GA promotes cell elongation (Heck et al., 2016). We found that supplementation with bioactive GA 3 (100 mM) in the medium significantly promoted mesocotyl, coleoptile, and root growth of wild-type and ospil14 mutant seedlings and induced mesocotyl and coleoptile length of the OsPIL14OE seedlings compared to the mock control (Supplemental Fig. S3). However, GA 3 did not further induce primary root growth in OsPIL14OE lines (Supplemental Fig. S3).

Overexpression of OsPIL14 Enhances Seedling Growth under Salt Stress
Next, we investigated the effect of salt treatment on plant growth in the dark. Supplementation with salt drastically inhibited coleoptile, mesocotyl, and root growth in OsPIL14OE and ZH11 seedlings, at especially 0.2 M NaCl (Fig. 2, A and B). OsPIL14OE lines exhibited longer shoot and root than cv ZH11 under salt stress (Fig. 2,A and B). Mesocotyl elongation of the OsPI-L14OE lines was greatly inhibited by salt and, to a lesser degree, in the presence of additional 100 mM GA 3 (Supplemental Fig. S3, A and B). When plants were treated with 0.1 M NaCl and 120 mM paclobutrazol (PAC; a GA biosynthesis inhibitor), the coleoptile and root elongation of ospil14 and OsPIL14OE and mesocotyl elongation of OsPIL14OE were more inhibited than those treated with 0.1 M NaCl alone (Supplemental Fig. S3). These results indicate that overexpression of OsPIL14 enhances plant growth under salts stress.
When seedlings were grown under a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod, the fresh and dry weight, shoot length, and root length of OsPIL14OE were similar to those of ZH11 (Fig. 2, C-G). Although supplementation with 0.1 M NaCl inhibited seedling growth, the fresh and dry weight, shoot length, and root length of OsPI-L14OE plants were significantly larger than those of ZH11 (Fig. 2, C-G). Furthermore, the chlorophyll contents and photosynthesis efficiency, including Pn (net photosynthesis) and F v /F m (efficiency of PSII), of OsPIL14OE plants were significantly higher than those of cv ZH11 when treated with 0.1 M NaCl (Fig. 2, H-J), indicating that OsPIL14 enhances photosynthesis under salt stress.
To mimic seedling emergence in nature and to investigate whether overexpressing OsPIL14 promoted emerging from deep soil of rice, we placed the germinated seeds in pots and covered them with 1 or 3 cm of soil followed by irrigating with 75 mM NaCl or water. As shown in Figure 2K, shoot growth of the OsPIL14OE plants did not differ from that of ZH11 when seeds were covered with 1 cm of soil regardless of NaCl treatment. However, when the seeds were covered with 3 cm of soil, 70% of the OsPIL14OE seedlings but 50% of the ZH11 seedlings emerged from soil. Moreover, under 75 mM NaCl condition, 40% of OsPIL14OE could emerge, whereas all of ZH11 failed to penetrate the soil (Fig. 2K). These results suggest that OsPIL14 promotes seedlings etiolation and emerging from soil under salt stress.

Salt Promotes OsPIL14 Degradation
We then investigated whether salt regulates OsPIL14 transcription and/or OsPIL14 protein accumulation. Reverse transcription followed by quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) showed that 0.3 M NaCl greatly increased OsPIL14 expression in dark-grown ZH11 seedlings (Fig. 3A). However, the OsPIL14-GFP levels were markedly decreased in the OsPIL14OE seedlings using anti-GFP antibody after 12 h of salt treatment compared to the mock control, and the reduction was greatly inhibited in the presence of 50 mM MG132, a 26S proteasome inhibitor (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, OsPIL14-GFP levels gradually decreased in seedlings incubated with increasing concentrations of NaCl (Fig. 3C).
During the dark-to-light transition in the NaCltreated seedlings, OsPIL14 expression in shoots increased and peaked at 6 h, whereas OsPIL14 expression in roots rapidly peaked after 3 h of treatment and dropped afterward (Supplemental Fig. S4A). We found that OsPIL14-GFP levels rapidly decreased when the OsPIL14OE seedlings were transferred from darkness to light and were further reduced with the addition of NaCl treatment (Supplemental Fig. S4B), suggesting that light induces OsPIL14 degradation, similar as PIF proteins in Arabidopsis (Castillon et al., 2007).
Moreover, we examined OsPIL14 protein stability of seedlings grown under a 12-h light/12-h dark photoperiod. OsPIL14-GFP accumulated to high levels after a 12-h dark period compared to the end of the light period; however, 0.3 M NaCl prevented the accumulation of OsPIL14-GFP (Fig. 3D). Strikingly, OsPIL14 turnover was largely inhibited with the addition of MG132 (Fig. 3D). We also investigated the effects of exogenous GA 3 and PAC together with NaCl on OsPIL14 accumulation. The PAC treatment reduced OsPIL14-GFP levels, and the GA 3 treatment increased OsPIL14-GFP levels. OsPIL14-GFP further decreased in the presence of both PAC and NaCl, whereas NaCl antagonized the effect of GA 3 (Fig. 3E). These results confirm that GA promotes OsPIL14 accumulation, whereas salt induces OsPIL14 degradation likely through the 26S proteasome pathway.

Salt Induces SLR1 Accumulation
Salt induces RGA (a DELLA protein) accumulation in Arabidopsis roots (Achard et al., 2006). SLR1 is the only DELLA protein in rice (Itoh et al., 2002). We then explored whether salt regulates SLR1 protein stability. The SLR1 transcript level was slightly induced in cv ZH11 seedlings after 3 h of 0.3 M NaCl treatment (Fig. 4A). The SLR1 protein level was slightly increased by NaCl treatment in ZH11 (Fig. 4B). Although SLR1 was largely degraded in response to 100 mM GA 3 treatment, as previously reported (Sasaki et al., 2003), NaCl could partly inhibit GA 3 -induced SLR1 degradation (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, the SLR1 level increased along with the increasing concentrations of NaCl (Fig. 4C). Moreover, when seedlings were transferred to medium supplemented with 0.3 M NaCl, SLR1 accumulated and peaked after 24 h of NaCl treatment (Fig. 4D). These results suggest that salt promotes SLR1 accumulation and slightly inhibits GA-induced SLR1 degradation.
Next, we investigated whether SLR1 is involved in regulating mesocotyl growth in response to salt. We obtained a slr1-6 mutant allele, which has a point mutation that produces L246P amino acid substitution and results in a constitutive GA response (Huang et al., 2015). Ten-day-old dark-grown slr1-6 seedlings developed elongated mesocotyls and had much longer coleoptiles and primary roots than the cv ZH11 control plants (Fig. 4, E-G). These results indicate that SLR1 inhibits seedling growth under salt stress.
OsPIL14 Directly Regulates the Expression of Cell Elongation-Related Genes, and SLR1 Interferes with OsPIL14 Activity To investigate how OsPIL14 regulates rice seedling growth, we grew cv ZH11 and OsPIL14OE plants in darkness for 7 d and analyzed the global transcriptome changes using RNA sequencing. Genes with more than 2-fold changes (P , 0.05) were considered differentially expressed genes. We found that 918 genes were upregulated, whereas 818 genes were down-regulated in OsPIL14OE versus cv ZH11 plants (Supplemental Dataset S1). Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed that the up-regulated genes by OsPIL14 overexpression are mostly involved in oxidation reduction and catabolic and metabolic processes, whereas the down-regulated genes largely participate in photosynthesis (Supplemental Fig. S5). Promoter analysis showed that ;93% of the induced genes contain at least one G-box or PBE motif (putative cis-elements for binding of PIF proteins; Pfeiffer et al., 2014), and ;60% and 90% of the repressed genes have G-box or PBE motif, respectively, within their 2-kb promoter regions (Fig. 6A), suggesting that OsPIL14 likely associates with these genes.
Among the up-regulated genes, we picked Expansin A4 (OsEXPA4), which is involved in cell elongation (Choi et al., 2003;Todaka et al., 2012), and Os08g25710, which might be involved in cellulose synthesis, for further analysis. The expression of OsEXPA4 and Os08g25710 was increased in the OsPIL14OE plants, and this induction was largely inhibited by salt treatment (Fig. 6B). Their expression was also increased in the slr1-6 mutant after GA 3 application (Fig. 6B). A yeast one-hybrid assay showed that OsPIL14 fused with the B42 activation domain (AD-OsPIL14) could bind and activate the expression of LacZ reporter driven by the OsEXPA4 and Os08g25710 promoter fragments (Fig. 6C). Furthermore, an EMSA showed that GST-OsPIL14, but not GST alone, bound to an OsEXPA4 fragment containing a G-box labeled with biotin, and the amount of the shifted bands was reduced by addition of recombinant MBP-SLR1 (Fig. 6D), suggesting that SLR1 inhibits the binding ability of OsPIL14 on its target.
Next, we performed a chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with qPCR (ChIP-qPCR) analysis and found that the promoter regions of OsEXPA4 and Os08g25710 were significantly enriched in OsPIL14OE samples compared to ZH11; this enrichment was drastically reduced in OsPIL14OE plants treated with NaCl (Fig. 6E). We then carried out a transient LUC expression assay. The LUC reporter gene was driven by Figure 6. OsPIL14 regulates downstream gene expression, and SLR1 inhibits OsPIL14 activity. A, Percentage of genes containing G-box or PBE motifs in their promoter among the genes differentially regulated by OsPIL14. B, RT-qPCR. Plants of ZH11, OsPIL14OE (line 5 and 22), and slr1-6 were grown in the dark for 7 d and treated with various chemicals for 12 h. Error bars represent SD of three biological replicates. C, Yeast one-hybrid assay. The LacZ reporter gene was driven by the promoter of Os08g25710 or OsEXPA4. D, Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). Various recombinant proteins were incubated with biotin-labeled DNA probes of OsEXPA4 for 1 h. E, ChIP-qPCR assay. Error bars represent SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference from cv ZH11 using a Student's t test (**P , 0.01). Diagrams of the promoter structure and regions for PCR were shown. F, Transient LUC assay. Different plasmid combinations were coinfiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves and incubated for 2 d. Representative LUC luminescence images are shown on the right. Control means vectors without expressing OsPIL14 and SLR1. Error bars represent SD of three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant difference using oneway ANOVA (P , 0.05). Bars 5 1 cm. either the Os08g25710 or OsEXPA4 promoter and cotransformed with 35S:OsPIL14 and/or 35S:OsSLR1 into N. benthamiana leaves. LUC luminescence in both reporter constructs was greatly induced by OsPIL14; however, LUC expression was inhibited by cotransformation with SLR1 (Fig. 6F). These results indicate that OsPIL14 directly regulates the expression of cell elongation-related genes and that SLR1 interferes with OsPIL14 activity.

DISCUSSION
The functions of PIF and DELLA proteins and their interactions in controlling plant growth and development have been studied extensively in Arabidopsis (Leivar and Monte, 2014). However, the roles of these factors in monocot crops, especially in response to salinity stress, are largely unknown. In this study, we showed that overexpressing OsPIL14 (and the other OsPILs) led to elongated mesocotyls in rice in the dark but not under light conditions ( Fig. 1; Supplemental  Fig. S1), suggesting that OsPILs promote skotomorphogenesis in rice. Consistent with this, OsPIL14 regulates the expression of cell elongation-related genes (Fig. 6). The ospil14 mutant did not show mesocotyl phenotype under the conditions we tested, likely due to functional redundancy with the other OsPIL genes. A previous study reported that heterologous expression of OsPIL11-15 represses photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis (Nakamura et al., 2007). Transgenic rice overexpressing OsPIL13 had increased internode growth (Todaka et al., 2012). Surprisingly, overexpression of OsPIL15 represses seedling growth in the dark (Zhou et al., 2014). These studies suggest that the roles of OsPIL members could differ. Generation of single and higher order ospil mutants should help clarify this issue. However, loss of four PIF genes (PIF1, PIF3, PIF4, and PIF5) in Arabidopsis causes a constitutive light response in darkness, whereas overexpression of PIF3 results in reduced photomorphogenesis under light but does not alter phenotypes in darkness (Leivar et al., 2008;Shin et al., 2009;Chen et al., 2013). Interestingly, OsPIL14 also promotes root elongation in the dark (Fig. 1), which is likely mediated by the GA pathway, as GA 3 -treated cv ZH11 seedlings exhibited similar root length as the OsPIL14OE plants without GA treatment (Supplemental Fig. S3). Thus, the PIF/PIL regulators may differentially mediate seedling growth in Arabidopsis and rice in response to light signals; these regulatory mechanisms remain to be investigated in future studies. Since wild-type rice (such as cv ZH11) seedlings normally do not exhibit obvious mesocotyl elongation in the dark or under light conditions, overexpression of OsPIL14 may provide a unique approach for studying mesocotyl formation and regulation in rice.
We reveal that overexpression of OsPIL14 enhances seedling growth under salt stress and that salt induces OsPIL14 turnover via 26S proteasome-mediated degradation (Figs. 2 and 3). The function of OsPILs in salt stress response is likely conserved in monocot plants as heterologous expression of maize (Zea mays) PIF3 can enhance salt tolerance in rice (Gao et al., 2015). However, recent studies showed that PIF4 reduces salt stress tolerance, and salt does not affect PIF4/PIF5 protein accumulation in Arabidopsis (Sakuraba et al., 2017;Hayes et al., 2019); therefore, distinct mechanisms of PIFs might also be involved in different plant species. Nevertheless, the relationship between the PIF proteins and salt stress requires further investigation. Determining the mechanism by which salt triggers OsPIL14 degradation is an objective for future studies, e.g. identification of the E3 ubiquitin ligase. Moreover, photo-activated phyB interacts with PIFs, resulting in their degradation and consequently releasing the inhibitory effect on photomorphogenesis (Castillon et al., 2007). OsPIL14 interacts with rice phyB, and deficiency of OsPHYB improves salt tolerance (Cordeiro et al., 2016;Kwon et al., 2018). Therefore, PIF proteins play crucial roles in linking light and salt stress.
We show that salt promotes protein accumulation/ stability of SLR1, which negatively regulates rice growth under salt stress (Fig. 4). Salt-induced SLR1 accumulation could further inhibit the function of OsPILs. Thus, OsPIL14 acts as a central transcription factor that is negatively regulated by salt in three ways: protein degradation and SLR1-mediated sequestration and degradation. An early study reported that loss of DELLA conferred salt tolerance under low salt concentration; however, overexpressing DELLA enhanced Figure 7. A proposed working model of the OsPIL14 -SLR1 module. Phytochrome photoreceptors absorb light and may trigger the degradation of OsPIL proteins, while the GID1 receptor binds GA and causes DELLA (SLR1) turnover. The OsPIL14 transcription factor directly or indirectly activates the expression of cell elongation-related genes, for example EXPA4, resulting in seedling growth in the dark. SLR1 negatively regulates OsPIL14 activity through both sequestration and degradation of OsPIL14. Salt stress inhibits seedling growth through promoting OsPIL14 degradation but SLR1 accumulation via unknown mechanisms. Arrows indicate positive regulation and bars denote negative effect. Broken lines show indirect regulation.
plants survive under high salt stress (Achard et al., 2006). This indicates that plants sacrifice growth rate for survival in saline environments via a DELLA-dependent manner. The OsPIL14-overexpressing line accumulated more SLR1 than wild type under both mock and salt stress (Supplemental Fig. S6) and exhibited a faster growth rate under saline soil (Fig. 2K), suggesting that the OsPIL14 confers salt resistance with sacrifice of less growth rate. In Arabidopsis, DELLAs physically interact with PIFs and block their activities by sequestering PIFs from binding to their targets (de Lucas et al., 2008;Feng et al., 2008;Leivar and Monte, 2014). Similarly, our results show that a single DELLA protein, SLR1, inhibits the binding activity of OsPIL14 in regulating the expression of target genes, such as OsEXPA4 and Os08g25710 in rice (Fig. 6). Moreover, PAC, which prevents DELLA degradation, negatively regulates OsPIL14 abundance, especially when combined with salt stress, whereas GA 3 stimulates OsPIL14 accumulation (Fig. 3), suggesting that SLR1 might have an effect on OsPIL14 stability. In agreement with this, a recent study showed that DELLAs also promote PIF3 degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome system in regulating hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis (Li et al., 2016). An earlier study reported that salt slows plant growth by means of reduced accumulation of bioactive GAs and that Arabidopsis plants lacking four DELLA genes are salt sensitive, whereas stabilized DELLA proteins enhance salt tolerance (Achard et al., 2006). Salt-induced SLR1 accumulation could further inhibit the function of OsPILs. It was proposed that both sequestration and degradation of transcription factors by DELLAs might be a general mechanism in plants (Li et al., 2016). Thus, OsPIL14 acts as a central transcription factor that is negatively regulated by salt through protein degradation and SLR1-mediated sequestration. PIF and DELLA proteins are reciprocally regulated, probably via posttranslational modification.
In summary, our study reveals a mechanism by which the OsPIL14-SLR1 transcriptional module integrates light and GA signaling to control seedling growth in response to salt stress environment (Fig. 7). This regulatory mechanism may help plants link endogenous and external factors that remodel growth and fitness under changing environments. More than 6% of the world's total land area is affected by excess salts, which harm plant growth and development and hinder agricultural production (Ismail and Horie, 2017). Successful shoot elongation and penetration through the soil at early developmental stages are crucial for plant growth, particularly in saline soils. Our finding that overexpressing OsPIL14 promotes mesocotyl elongation and seedling emergence from soil, providing a suitable target gene and strategies for crop genetic modification with enhanced salt tolerance.

Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
The UBQp:OsPILs-GFP transgenic plants and slr1-6 mutants (Huang et al., 2015) are in the rice (Oryza sativa 'Zhonghua 11' [cv ZH11]) background. Seeds were germinated for 3 d and placed in a germination bag containing modified Kimura B solution (Wang et al., 2018) and grown under cold fluorescent light (;300 mmol m 2 s 21 ) or in darkness at 28°C for 7 d. For chemical treatments, seedlings were grown in or transferred to solution containing different concentrations of NaCl, GA 3 (0.4% [v/v] ethanol as the mock control), PAC, or MG132 (0.5% [v/v] dimethyl sulfoxide as the mock control) as stated in the text. For light transition, seedlings were grown in darkness for 7 d and then exposed to light (;300 mmol m 2 s 21 ) in the absence or presence of NaCl for up to 12 h. Representative images were taken using a digital camera (Olympus), and physiological phenotypes were determined. For soil experiments, germinated seeds were covered with 1 or 3 cm of soil in the absence or presence of 75 mM NaCl and seedlings were grown under a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod at 28°C for 14 d.

Chlorophyll Measurement
Rice leaves were sampled before or after NaCl treatment, and chlorophylls were extracted as described previously (Li et al., 2019). Total chlorophyll contents were determined in a spectrophotometer and the amount was calculated using the equation chlorophyll 5 22.12 OD 652 1 2.71 OD 665 .

Photosynthetic Parameter Determination
cv ZH11 and OsPIL14OE plants were grown with or without 0.1 M NaCl under a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod for 7 d in a growth chamber. Leaves were dark adapted for 20 min before chlorophyll fluorescence measurement. Fluorescence was detected by an IMAGING-PAM Chl fluorometer (under a single saturating pulse of .1800 mmol photons$m 22 $s 21 ). The F v /F m was calculated using Imaging WinGegE software (Walz). The Pn was detected using the plant photosynthetic physiology and environmental monitoring system (PTM-48A, BF-Agritech). Data were collected from three leaves within five individual plants for each genotype.

Plasmid Construction
To obtain the open reading frame (ORF) of OsPIL14 and SLR1, total RNA was extracted from cv ZH11 using the RNAprep pure plant kit (TIANGEN) and the first-strand cDNA was reverse transcribed using the GoldScript cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). The ORFs and fragments of OsPIL14 and SLR1 were amplified using high-fidelity KOD DNA polymerase (TOYOBO) and cloned into the pEASY vector (TransGen), resulting in pEASY-OsPIL14, pEASY-OsPIL14N, pEASY-OsPIL14C, pEASY-SLR1, pEASY-SLR1D1, pEASY-SLR1D2, and pEASY-SLR1D3. Primers are listed in Supplemental Table S1.
For the yeast one-hybrid and transient expression assays, the OsPIL14 ORF from pEASY-OsPIL14 (digested with EcoRI and XhoI) was inserted into the EcoRI -XhoI sites of pB42AD (Clontech) to generate AD-OsPIL14. The promoter fragments (;2.0 kb upstream of the ATG start site) of OsEXPA4 and Os08g25710 were PCR amplified from cv ZH11 genomic DNA and cloned into pEASY to generate pEASY-OsEXPA4p/Os08g25710p, respectively. Their corresponding fragments from pEASY-OsEXPA4p (cut with KpnI and SalI) and pEASY-Os08g25710p (cut with KpnI and XhoI) were inserted into pLacZ2m (Lin et al., 2007;cut with KpnI and SalI) or p1302-LUC (Zhang et al., 2017;cut with EcoRI and SalI) to generate OsEXPA4p:LacZ, Os08g25710p:LacZ, OsEXPA4p:LUC, and Os08g25710p:LUC, respectively.

Generation of Overexpression and Mutant Lines
The ORFs of OsPIL11, OsPIL12, OsPIL14, OsPIL15, and OsPIL16 were fused in-frame with GFP and driven by the OsUBQ5 promoter, generating UBQp:OsPIL-GFP. The corresponding vectors were transferred into cv ZH11 wild type via the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated method. The ospil14 mutant was generated using CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein9 by Towin Biotechnology. All overexpression and mutant lines were confirmed by antibiotic selection, immunoblotting, or sequencing and homozygous lines were used in all experiments.

Real-Time RT-qPCR and RNA Sequencing
Plants were grown and treated with chemicals as indicated in the text. Total RNA was isolated from seedlings using the RNAprep pure plant kit (Tiangen). First-strand cDNA was synthesized using the Goldscript cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). qPCR was performed using SYBR premix Ex Taq (Takara) in a LightCycler 480 (Roche). Each analysis was performed with three biological replicates. The rice gene UBQ5 was used as an internal control. The qPCR data were analyzed using delta-delta CT method as described previously (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008). The PCR primers are listed in Supplemental  Table S1. cv ZH11 and OsPIL14OE (5) seedlings were grown in darkness for 7 d before sampling. RNA sequencing analysis was conducted as previously described with three biological replicates (Huai et al., 2018). Genes with more than 2-fold change in expression and P , 0.05 were considered to be differentially expressed genes. The promoter sequences of those differentially expressed genes were obtained from Rice Genome Annotation Project (Kawahara et al., 2013). Promoter analysis of the G-box and PBE motif were performed as previously described (Zhang et al., 2019). GO enrichment was analyzed using agriGO as described by Du et al. (2010).

ChIP-qPCR Assay
The ChIP experiments were performed as described previously (Saleh et al., 2008). In brief, 2 g of OsPIL14OE and ZH11 seedlings were harvested and fixed in 1% (v/v) formaldehyde under a vacuum for 30 min. The cross linking was quenched with the addition of 0.125 M Gly for 5 min. The tissues were ground, and the chromatin was isolated and sonicated to produce DNA fragments around 200 bp. The chromatin samples were incubated with anti-GFP antibody at 4°C overnight, and the immunoprecipitated complexes were collected. Precipitated DNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform, precipitated with ethanol, and dissolved in water. The DNA fragments of the promoter regions were amplified by qPCR. Relative enrichment of target sequences after anti-GFP pulldown was sequentially normalized to levels in the input and in cv ZH11 mock treatment. OsUBQ5 served as an internal control. Primer pairs are listed in Supplemental Table S1.

Yeast One-and Two-Hybrid Assays
For the yeast one-hybrid assay, various AD fusion constructs were cotransformed with LexAop:LacZ (Clontech) reporter plasmids into yeast strain EGY48. Transformants were grown on synthetic dextrose/-Trp-Ura dropout plates, and b-galactosidase activity was visualized with 5-bromo-4chloro-3-indolyl-b-D-galactopyranoside. For the yeast two-hybrid assay, the GBD and GAD fusion constructs were cotransformed into Y2HGold yeast strain, and the interaction was tested on the synthetic dextrose/-Trp-Leu-His-Ade dropout plate.

Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting
Seedlings were grown and treated with chemicals as indicated in the text. Seedling samples were ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen. About 100 mL powder was solubilized with an equal volume of extraction buffer (500 mM  The supernatant was collected after centrifuging at 15,000g for 15 min at 4°C. Protein concentration was quantified using the Bradford assay. The total protein extracts were separated on a 10% (w/v) SDS-PAGE gel and then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% (w/v) skim milk TTBS (0.1% [v/v] Tween 20 in 2 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 13.7 mM NaCl) for 60 min and incubated with anti-GFP (TransGen, HT801), anti-SLR1 (Huang et al., 2015), anti-actin (Cwbio, CW0264M), or anti-TUB (homemade) primary antibodies for 40 min followed by blotting with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Cwbio, CW0102S). The immunoblotting signals were captured with a chemiluminescence imaging system (Biostep).

Pull-Down Assay
The procedures for the pull-down assay were modified from a previous report (Li et al., 2011). Approximately 2 mg of purified recombinant bait proteins (GST-OsPIL14 or GST) was incubated with 2 mg of prey protein (MBP-SLR1) in 1 mL binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.6% [v/v] Triton X-100) at 4°C for 2.5 h. Following the addition of glutathione sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare), the samples were further incubated for 1 h. After washing with binding buffer, the precipitated proteins were eluted by heating the beads in 23 SDS loading buffer at 95°C for 10 min and then separated on a 10% (w/v) SDS-PAGE gel. The proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-GST (Abcam, ab19256) and anti-MBP (Abcam, ab9084) primary antibodies.

Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation Assay
The corresponding plasmids were integrated into A. tumefaciens strain GV3101. A. tumefaciens carrying the constructs of interest was infiltrated into the abaxial surface of 4-week-old N. benthamiana leaves, and the plants were grown for 2 d before examination. The YFP signals were observed with a confocal laser-scanning microscope (TCS SP5; Leica).

EMSA
GST-OsPIL14 and MBP-SLR1 recombinant proteins were expressed in the Rossetta-gami (DE3) strain of Escherichia coli. The soluble fusion proteins were purified using glutathione sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare; for GST fusions) and dextrin sepharose high performance (GE Healthcare; for MBP fusions). The EMSA experiment was carried out using the LightShift chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two complementary oligonucleotides were synthesized and biotinylated using the biotin DNA labeling kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The labeled oligonucleotides were incubated with MBP-SLR1, GST-OsPIL14, or both. Free DNA and the protein-probe complexes were separated on a 6% (w/v) native polyacrylamide gel in 0.53 TBE and transferred to a nylon membrane (Millipore). Biotin-labeled DNA was captured according to the manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a chemiluminescence imaging system (Biostep). The oligonucleotide sequences are shown in Supplemental Table S1.

Sequence Analysis
The amino acid sequences (PIF1, PIF3, PIF4, PIF5, PIF6, and PIF7 in Arabidopsis; OsPIL11-16 in O. sativa) were aligned with DNAMAN. The same program was used to analyze protein phylogeny by the neighbor-joining method as previously reported (Li et al., 2019).

Supplemental Data
The following supplemental materials are available.
Supplemental Figure S2. Sequencing analysis showing OsPIL14 deletion in the ospil14 mutants.
Supplemental Figure S3. Seedling phenotypes under conditions of different chemical treatments.
Supplemental Figure S4. OsPIL14 expression pattern during dark-to-light transition.
Supplemental Figure S5. GO analysis of OsPIL14-regulated genes.
Supplemental Table S1. List of primers used in this study.
Supplemental Dataset S1. A list of differentially regulated genes by OsPIL14.