-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Daniela S. Floss, Willibald Schliemann, Jürgen Schmidt, Dieter Strack, Michael H. Walter, RNA Interference-Mediated Repression of MtCCD1 in Mycorrhizal Roots of Medicago truncatula Causes Accumulation of C27 Apocarotenoids, Shedding Light on the Functional Role of CCD1 , Plant Physiology, Volume 148, Issue 3, November 2008, Pages 1267–1282, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.125062
Close - Share Icon Share
Abstract
Tailoring carotenoids by plant carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases (CCDs) generates various bioactive apocarotenoids. Recombinant CCD1 has been shown to catalyze symmetrical cleavage of C40 carotenoid substrates at 9,10 and 9′,10′ positions. The actual substrate(s) of the enzyme in planta, however, is still unknown. In this study, we have carried out RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated repression of a Medicago truncatula CCD1 gene in hairy roots colonized by the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus Glomus intraradices. As a consequence, the normal AM-mediated accumulation of apocarotenoids (C13 cyclohexenone and C14 mycorradicin derivatives) was differentially modified. Mycorradicin derivatives were strongly reduced to 3% to 6% of the controls, while the cyclohexenone derivatives were only reduced to 30% to 47%. Concomitantly, a yellow-orange color appeared in RNAi roots. Based on ultraviolet light spectra and mass spectrometry analyses, the new compounds are C27 apocarotenoic acid derivatives. These metabolic alterations did not lead to major changes in molecular markers of the AM symbiosis, although a moderate shift to more degenerating arbuscules was observed in RNAi roots. The unexpected outcome of the RNAi approach suggests C27 apocarotenoids as the major substrates of CCD1 in mycorrhizal root cells. Moreover, literature data implicate C27 apocarotenoid cleavage as the general functional role of CCD1 in planta. A revised scheme of plant carotenoid cleavage in two consecutive steps is proposed, in which CCD1 catalyzes only the second step in the cytosol (C27 → C14 + C13), while the first step (C40 → C27 + C13) may be catalyzed by CCD7 and/or CCD4 inside plastids.
Carotenoids are a large class of isoprenoid pigments, which are produced by plants and certain microbes. Conjugated double bonds in a C40 tetraterpene skeleton form the basis of their chromophores, which are extended and modified by cyclization, isomerization, and oxidation. Carotenoids fulfill important roles as accessory photosynthetic pigments harvesting light and preventing photooxidative damage, as general antioxidants, and as mediators of membrane fluidity. They also serve as yellow, orange, and red pigments in many flowers and fruits. In plants, biosynthesis of C40 carotenoids is compartmentalized to plastids, comprising not only chloroplasts but also chromoplasts and other plastid types (Hirschberg, 2001). A plastidial location also applies for the early steps of biosynthesis carried out by enzymes of the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway, generating C5 isopentenyl diphosphate precursors (Rodríguez-Concepción and Boronat, 2002).
Carotenoid catabolism is not simply responsible for balancing steady-state carotenoid levels but forms many new bioactive compounds. While unspecific chemical oxidative cleavage is possible, the vast majority of known cleavage products (apocarotenoids) are thought to originate from defined cleavage (“tailoring”) of carotenoids by carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CCD) enzymes (Giuliano et al., 2003; Bouvier et al., 2005; Auldridge et al., 2006b; Kloer and Schulz, 2006). CCDs display a high degree of regiospecificity and stereospecificity and give rise to a variety of different products with a multitude of biological functions. These include the widespread C13 apocarotenoid volatiles of flower scents and fruit aromas from rose (Rosa spp.), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), melon (Cucumis melo), and many others (Eugster and Märki-Fischer, 1991; Lewinsohn et al., 2005) and the C20, C24, and C10 colorants and spices of annatto (Bixa orellana) and saffron (Crocus sativus; Bouvier et al., 2005). In addition, many signaling molecules comprising abscisic acid (ABA), strigolactones, and a shoot-branching inhibitor with unknown structure are derived from cleavage products of carotenoids (Akiyama et al., 2005; Nambara and Marion-Poll, 2005; Mouchel and Leyser, 2007).
Simplified hypothetical pathway to C13 cyclohexenone and C14 mycorradicin derivatives in mycorrhizal roots. The indicated cleavage specificities of CCD1 and its presumed C40 carotenoid substrate have been deduced from in vitro studies. An early biosynthetic step in the MEP pathway previously targeted for gene silencing (DXS2) is highlighted. The carotenoid precursor in mycorrhizal roots is still elusive. DMAPP, Dimethylallyl diphosphate; DXP, 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate; DXR, 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase; GAP, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; Gly, glycoside; IPP, isopentenyl diphosphate; MEP, 2-C-methyl-d-erythritol 4-phosphate; R1, R2, unknown moieties.
Root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi frequently leads to the accumulation of large amounts of apocarotenoids of a cyclic C13 type and a linear C14 type (Klingner et al., 1995; Maier et al., 1995; Walter et al., 2000; Strack and Fester, 2006; Fig. 1). This phenomenon occurs preferentially during late stages of the AM symbiotic plant-microbe interaction and is often accompanied by the appearance of a yellowish root coloration. The chromophore responsible for this coloration is mycorradicin, a C14 polyenic dicarboxylic acid. Derivatives of mycorradicin accumulate concomitantly with structural variants of C13 cyclohexenones, the latter being glycosylated and deposited in vacuoles. Both of these AM-induced apocarotenoid types were predicted to be generated by the action of a CCD1-type enzyme on a common C40 carotenoid precursor (Walter et al., 2000, 2007; Hans et al., 2004; Strack and Fester, 2006; Akiyama, 2007; Fig. 1). Attempts to isolate pathway intermediates and particularly the proposed C40 carotenoid precursor have so far only led to the detection of a minor increase in phytoene upon application of the carotenoid biosynthesis inhibitor norfluorazon (Fester et al., 2005). This indicates that carotenoid cleavage is unlikely to be a rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of these apocarotenoids in mycorrhizal roots and that the carotenoids formed during the symbiosis are probably instantly cleaved. A different class of plant apocarotenoids (strigolactones) occurring in low quantities plays a role in early signaling steps of the AM symbiosis (Akiyama et al., 2005; Matusova et al., 2005), but whether there is any relationship to the biogenesis of abundant C13- and C14-type apocarotenoids is currently unknown.
Previous molecular studies on the accumulation of C13 and C14 apocarotenoids in mycorrhizal roots have focused on the first two steps of the MEP pathway. Both 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase (DXS) and 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase genes were shown to be transcriptionally up-regulated in cereal roots upon mycorrhization, emphasizing the importance of precursor supply activation (Walter et al., 2000; Hans et al., 2004). Further investigations revealed the widespread occurrence of two differentially regulated DXS isogenes, of which only DXS2 was up-regulated in mycorrhizal roots (Walter et al., 2002). Recent studies have shown local promoter activity of a DXS2 gene in cells hosting fungal arbuscules (Floss et al., 2008), in accordance with earlier findings of local apocarotenoid deposition in arbusculated cells (Fester et al., 2002a).
Arbuscules are highly branched fungal organs outgrowing from hyphae within host cortical root cells, which constitute the predominant site of nutrient exchange between the plant and the fungal symbiont. Their proper function can determine the development of symbiotic structures (Javot et al., 2007). Interestingly, strong silencing of DXS2 expression in hairy roots of Medicago truncatula leads to reduced levels of both types of apocarotenoids (cyclohexenone and mycorradicin derivatives), accompanied by an abolishment of the normal expression of many arbuscule-specific plant marker genes (Floss et al., 2008). However, whether this impairment of symbiotic functions is indeed linked to the lack of either of these mycorrhizal apocarotenoids is still unresolved, since effects from the absence of other DXS2-dependent isoprenoids cannot be excluded.
This still inconclusive result led us to target the later steps in the pathway, namely carotenoid cleavage, for a new RNA interference (RNAi) approach to elucidate the function of C13 cyclohexenone and/or C14 mycorradicin apocarotenoids in the AM symbiosis. CCD1 genes have been characterized from several plants, all showing that in Escherichia coli recombinant CCD1 preferentially cleaves a variety of C40 carotenoids with cyclic and noncyclic end groups symmetrically at the 9,10 (9′,10′) double bonds (Schwartz et al., 2001; Mathieu et al., 2005; Ibdah et al., 2006; Fig. 1). However, it has not been proven whether these biochemical cleavage properties in vitro also represent the normal biological role of CCD1 enzymes. In fact, little is known about the actual substrates of native CCD1 in compartmentalized plant cells containing plastids. Previous knockdown approaches on CCD1 expression in transgenic plants have resulted in strong suppression of CCD1 transcript levels but to only limited effects on C40 carotenoid levels, prompting speculations about additional players (Simkin et al., 2004a, 2004b; Auldridge et al., 2006a). In this study, we have silenced the expression of a MtCCD1 gene in mycorrhizal hairy roots of M. truncatula. Surprisingly, the accumulation of the two hitherto known mycorrhiza-induced apocarotenoid types was reduced to different extents and novel C27 apocarotenoid derivatives appeared as a consequence of MtCCD1 repression. Together, these and other observations lead to a new view of carotenoid cleavage in planta, reconciling previous contradictions regarding the presumed substrate and the CCD1 enzyme being in different cellular compartments.
RESULTS
Cloning of a MtCCD1 cDNA and Proof of Functionality of the Protein Encoded
A full-length MtCCD1 cDNA was isolated from a M. truncatula mycorrhizal root cDNA library using an 825-bp MtCCD1 fragment as a probe. DNA sequencing of several clones revealed complete identity of the cDNA (accession no. FM204879) to TC100912 of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) Medicago Gene index (http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/cgi-bin/tgi/gimain.pl?gudb=medicago). The deduced MtCCD1 protein consists of 540 amino acids and has a calculated molecular mass of 60.9 kD. The MtCCD1 amino acid sequence exhibits strong similarity to many other CCD1 proteins, exemplified by 87.2% identity (91.1% similarity) to Phaseolus vulgaris CCD1, 80.2% identity (86.8% similarity) to Arabidopsis CCD1, and 76.5% identity (82.8% similarity) to maize CCD1 (Supplemental Fig. S1). This indicates that MtCCD1 belongs to the well-studied class of CCD1 proteins and genes (Schwartz et al., 2001; Simkin et al., 2004a, 2004b; Mathieu et al., 2005; Auldridge et al., 2006a; Ibdah et al., 2006; Kato et al., 2006; Sun et al., 2008; Vogel et al., 2008; Supplemental Fig. S1). Application of prediction algorithms (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/) suggests a subcellular localization of the MtCCD1 protein in the cytosol, in accordance with reports on other CCD1 proteins (data not shown). Searching EST databases of M. truncatula revealed 29 ESTs of the MtCCD1 type from all kinds of tissues, including roots and mycorrhizal roots. Four types of MtCCD1-related ESTs of 83% to 86% deduced amino acid sequence identity to MtCCD1 transcribed from putative MtCCD1 paralogs were much less abundant (one to three ESTs each) and originated from pod or shoot libraries but not from roots.
Expression of the MtCCD1 cDNA in E. coli strains engineered for carotenoid production. MtCCD1 expression constructs in pET-28a lacking or containing a C-terminal His tag as indicated were introduced into E. coli strains containing the plasmid pAC-BETA (center) or pAC-ZEAX (right) for β-carotene or zeaxanthin formation, respectively. The streak on top represents the strain transformed with the EV control.
Up-Regulation of MtCCD1 Transcript Levels in Mycorrhizal Roots of M. truncatula
Previous analyses have indicated a minor to moderate up-regulation of CCD1 transcripts in roots upon colonization by mycorrhizal fungi for both M. truncatula and maize (Lohse et al., 2005; Sun et al., 2008). To confirm these results for this study, we conducted an AM fungal colonization experiment on wild-type roots of M. truncatula for 7 and 9 weeks and for several biological replicates. An early gene of apocarotenoid biosynthesis, known to be AM inducible (MtDXS2; Walter et al., 2002; Floss et al., 2008), and a molecular marker of mycorrhizal colonization (the AM-specific expression of the phosphate transporter gene MtPT4; Harrison et al., 2002) were included in the analysis. Although MtCCD1 transcript levels were not elevated as strongly as those of either MtDXS2-1 or MtPT4, they exhibited a slight increase after 7 weeks and a still minor but significant elevation after 9 weeks (3-fold) in mycorrhizal roots compared with nonmycorrhizal control roots (Table I
Transcript levels of MtCCD1 in extracts of nonmycorrhizal and mycorrhizal wild-type roots after 7 or 9 weeks of fungal colonization by G. intraradices as determined by real time RT-PCR from three biological replicates
For comparison, additional data were obtained from a gene involved in early steps of apocarotenoid biosynthesis (MtDXS2-1) and from an arbuscule molecular marker gene (MtPT4).
Time . | Gene . | EΔCt × 10−3 . | . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | Nonmycorrhizal . | Mycorrhizal . | |
| 7 weeks | MtCCD1 | 28.0 ± 7.8 | 41.7 ± 14.6 | |
| MtDXS2-1 | 7.6 ± 3.1 | 16.3 ± 4.0 | ||
| MtPT4 | 0.02 ± 0.005 | 273.3 ± 94.5 | ||
| 9 weeks | MtCCD1 | 20.7 ± 6.8 | 62.3 ± 21.5 | |
| MtDXS2-1 | 4.4 ± 1.7 | 32.3 ± 5.1 | ||
| MtPT4 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 825.3 ± 386.9 | ||
Time . | Gene . | EΔCt × 10−3 . | . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | Nonmycorrhizal . | Mycorrhizal . | |
| 7 weeks | MtCCD1 | 28.0 ± 7.8 | 41.7 ± 14.6 | |
| MtDXS2-1 | 7.6 ± 3.1 | 16.3 ± 4.0 | ||
| MtPT4 | 0.02 ± 0.005 | 273.3 ± 94.5 | ||
| 9 weeks | MtCCD1 | 20.7 ± 6.8 | 62.3 ± 21.5 | |
| MtDXS2-1 | 4.4 ± 1.7 | 32.3 ± 5.1 | ||
| MtPT4 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 825.3 ± 386.9 | ||
Transcript levels of MtCCD1 in extracts of nonmycorrhizal and mycorrhizal wild-type roots after 7 or 9 weeks of fungal colonization by G. intraradices as determined by real time RT-PCR from three biological replicates
For comparison, additional data were obtained from a gene involved in early steps of apocarotenoid biosynthesis (MtDXS2-1) and from an arbuscule molecular marker gene (MtPT4).
Time . | Gene . | EΔCt × 10−3 . | . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | Nonmycorrhizal . | Mycorrhizal . | |
| 7 weeks | MtCCD1 | 28.0 ± 7.8 | 41.7 ± 14.6 | |
| MtDXS2-1 | 7.6 ± 3.1 | 16.3 ± 4.0 | ||
| MtPT4 | 0.02 ± 0.005 | 273.3 ± 94.5 | ||
| 9 weeks | MtCCD1 | 20.7 ± 6.8 | 62.3 ± 21.5 | |
| MtDXS2-1 | 4.4 ± 1.7 | 32.3 ± 5.1 | ||
| MtPT4 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 825.3 ± 386.9 | ||
Time . | Gene . | EΔCt × 10−3 . | . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | Nonmycorrhizal . | Mycorrhizal . | |
| 7 weeks | MtCCD1 | 28.0 ± 7.8 | 41.7 ± 14.6 | |
| MtDXS2-1 | 7.6 ± 3.1 | 16.3 ± 4.0 | ||
| MtPT4 | 0.02 ± 0.005 | 273.3 ± 94.5 | ||
| 9 weeks | MtCCD1 | 20.7 ± 6.8 | 62.3 ± 21.5 | |
| MtDXS2-1 | 4.4 ± 1.7 | 32.3 ± 5.1 | ||
| MtPT4 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 825.3 ± 386.9 | ||
Knockdown of MtCCD1 Expression Leads to Strong Reduction of Mycorradicin Derivatives But to Only Moderate Reduction of Cyclohexenone Derivatives
To reduce the levels of MtCCD1 transcripts and thereby generate a loss-of-function mutant of MtCCD1, an RNAi construct of 335 bp covering the 3′ part of the coding region and 3′ untranslated sequences was generated. After transfer into the binary vector pRedRoot, this construct was introduced and expressed in transgenic hairy roots of M. truncatula. Concomitantly, plants expressing EV sequences were cultivated as controls. After injection of Agrobacterium rhizogenes transgene carriers into hypocotyls, further cultivation of plants involved the selection of transgenic roots outgrowing from the injection site and the removal of residual wild-type as well as untransformed hairy roots to obtain individual, independently transformed composite plants, each with individual transgenic hairy roots and a wild-type shoot.
Transcript levels of MtCCD1 and levels of mycorradicin and cyclohexenone derivatives in mycorrhizal hairy roots of M. truncatula reduced for MtCCD1 expression. Results from two extensive experiments of two different colonization periods are shown using EV control roots (white columns) or RNAi roots (gray columns). The 7-week experiment consisted of eight individual EV controls and eight individual RNAi plants, while nine EV plants and 13 RNAi plants were used for the 9-week experiment. A, MtCCD1 transcript levels were determined by real time RT-PCR. B and C, Mycorradicin (B) and cyclohexenone (C) derivatives were assigned by their characteristic UV light spectra and quantified by HPLC using external standards. Letters differing between columns indicate significant differences of means based on Kruskal-Wallis test (mycorradicin) or one-way test (cyclohexenone derivatives). fw, Fresh weight.
A Yellow-Orange Root Coloration Appears in MtCCD1-Repressed Roots
Conspicuous alteration of root color in mycorrhizal hairy roots reduced for MtCCD1 expression. Total root systems or enlarged sectors of roots after 7 weeks of fungal colonization show faint orange-brown coloration of EV controls (left) or a much more intense yellow-orange coloration of MtCCD1 RNAi roots (right).
HPLC and Mass Spectrometry Analyses Indicate Accumulation of C27 Apocarotenoid Derivatives in MtCCD1-Silenced Roots
HPLC separation of methanolic extracts from hairy roots. A, Comparison of mycorrhizal EV control roots (bottom trace) and mycorrhizal RNAi roots (top trace) with compound detection at 440 nm. Separation of native constituents revealed seven novel compounds, which appear exclusively in RNAi samples. Corresponding UV absorption maxima are shown in the inset. B, Comparison between nonmycorrhizal (NM) and mycorrhizal (M) roots of three individual RNAi root systems each. Root extraction, separation conditions, and compound terminology were as in A.
HPLC analysis of methanolic extracts from mycorrhizal hairy roots after alkaline hydrolysis. Comparison of EV and RNAi roots revealed two major compounds appearing in RNAi roots termed Apo1 and Apo2. Their UV light spectra and absorption maxima are shown in the insets. Separation and detection conditions were as described for Figure 5.
Mass spectral analysis of compound Apo2. A, Scheme of the proposed fragmentation of compound Apo2, whose proposed structure is shown at top left. Apo2 exhibits a m/z of 733 [M + H]+. Removing one or two hexose residues (increments of 162) results in fragments with m/z 571 and 409. Splitting of the aglycone next to the cyclohexene ring is proposed to yield fragment a (m/z 269). Additional fragments may be derived from fragmentation in the linear side chain of the Apo2 aglycone (m/z 391) at the positions indicated, resulting in fragments of m/z 201 (b) or m/z 187 (c). B and C, ESI-CID mass spectra of Apo2 (B, 15 eV; C, 25 eV).
Root Colonization by AM Fungi and Transcript Levels of AM Molecular Markers Are Largely Unaltered upon MtCCD1 Repression
Assessment of mycorrhizal parameters from stained mycorrhizal roots of EV controls and RNAi plants of experiment I. A to C, Ink-staining analyses conducted and evaluated according to Trouvelot et al. (1986) using eight samples each of EV controls and RNAi roots. A, Frequency of fungal structures (F%). B, Density of fungal structures in the mycorrhizal part of the root (m%). C, Arbuscule abundance in the mycorrhizal part of the roots (a%). D, Evaluation of arbuscule morphologies from confocal images after acid-fuchsin staining of roots. Individual arbuscules were classified into one of four developmental stages as indicated using four samples each of EV controls and RNAi roots (containing 3%–6% residual MtCCD1 transcripts). One hundred arbuscules were evaluated from each root system. Statistical significance of alterations was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test (developing stage) or the one-way test (other stages). * P ≤ 0.05; ** P ≤ 0.01. sd values are shown below the graph.
Arbuscules are ephemeral structures that constantly decay and reemerge with a life span of 7 to 10 d (Alexander et al., 1988). Following up earlier assessments of the ratios of various stages of arbuscule development in arbuscule populations (Floss et al., 2008), an acid-fuchsin staining analysis was performed. Confocal images of arbuscules from these stainings were used to classify individual arbuscules into four developmental stages ranging from early development to fully degraded and dead arbuscules, as described (Floss et al., 2008). The most obvious alteration in MtCCD1-repressed roots was a moderate, yet significant, increase in degenerating arbuscules from 32% to 48% of the total population of arbuscules (Fig. 8D).
In addition, the transcript levels of several AM molecular marker plant genes were determined by real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. These markers include MtDXS2-1 as an AM-inducible gene involved in early steps of apocarotenoid biosynthesis (Walter et al., 2002; Floss et al., 2008) and MtPT4 as an AM-specific phosphate transporter (Harrison et al., 2002; Table I). Other AM markers have been specified by transcriptome analyses of mycorrhizal roots (Hohnjec et al., 2005) and have been used previously to assess alterations in mycorrhizal physiology upon MtDXS2 repression (Floss et al., 2008). None of the AM plant markers used in this study showed significant alterations in their transcript levels in mycorrhizal RNAi roots relative to mycorrhizal EV controls (Table II
Transcript levels of AM molecular marker plant genes in mycorrhizal hairy roots harboring the EV vector or the MtCCD1 RNAi construct determined from samples of experiment I
A single significant alteration is indicated in boldface. Four biological replicates were assayed in each case by real time RT-PCR.
DFCI Identifier . | Gene . | EΔCt × 10−3 . | . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | EV . | RNAi . | |
| TC94453 | MtPT4 | 146.5 ± 49.2 | 124.2 ± 56.6 | |
| TC95018 | MtGLP1 | 169.3 ± 41.2 | 170.6 ± 72.6 | |
| TC95567 | MtLEC7 | 80.3 ± 19.7 | 42.8 ± 7.4 | |
| TC95651 | MtDXS2-1 | 12.2 ± 3.0 | 10.8 ± 4.7 | |
| TC96500 | MtBCP1 | 5.0 ± 1.2 | 3.9 ± 1.7 | |
| TC100720 | MtGST1 | 96.3 ± 21.6 | 76.9 ± 19.3 | |
| TC106954 | MtSCP1 | 22.0 ± 5.0 | 18.2 ± 4.6 | |
DFCI Identifier . | Gene . | EΔCt × 10−3 . | . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | EV . | RNAi . | |
| TC94453 | MtPT4 | 146.5 ± 49.2 | 124.2 ± 56.6 | |
| TC95018 | MtGLP1 | 169.3 ± 41.2 | 170.6 ± 72.6 | |
| TC95567 | MtLEC7 | 80.3 ± 19.7 | 42.8 ± 7.4 | |
| TC95651 | MtDXS2-1 | 12.2 ± 3.0 | 10.8 ± 4.7 | |
| TC96500 | MtBCP1 | 5.0 ± 1.2 | 3.9 ± 1.7 | |
| TC100720 | MtGST1 | 96.3 ± 21.6 | 76.9 ± 19.3 | |
| TC106954 | MtSCP1 | 22.0 ± 5.0 | 18.2 ± 4.6 | |
Transcript levels of AM molecular marker plant genes in mycorrhizal hairy roots harboring the EV vector or the MtCCD1 RNAi construct determined from samples of experiment I
A single significant alteration is indicated in boldface. Four biological replicates were assayed in each case by real time RT-PCR.
DFCI Identifier . | Gene . | EΔCt × 10−3 . | . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | EV . | RNAi . | |
| TC94453 | MtPT4 | 146.5 ± 49.2 | 124.2 ± 56.6 | |
| TC95018 | MtGLP1 | 169.3 ± 41.2 | 170.6 ± 72.6 | |
| TC95567 | MtLEC7 | 80.3 ± 19.7 | 42.8 ± 7.4 | |
| TC95651 | MtDXS2-1 | 12.2 ± 3.0 | 10.8 ± 4.7 | |
| TC96500 | MtBCP1 | 5.0 ± 1.2 | 3.9 ± 1.7 | |
| TC100720 | MtGST1 | 96.3 ± 21.6 | 76.9 ± 19.3 | |
| TC106954 | MtSCP1 | 22.0 ± 5.0 | 18.2 ± 4.6 | |
DFCI Identifier . | Gene . | EΔCt × 10−3 . | . | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | EV . | RNAi . | |
| TC94453 | MtPT4 | 146.5 ± 49.2 | 124.2 ± 56.6 | |
| TC95018 | MtGLP1 | 169.3 ± 41.2 | 170.6 ± 72.6 | |
| TC95567 | MtLEC7 | 80.3 ± 19.7 | 42.8 ± 7.4 | |
| TC95651 | MtDXS2-1 | 12.2 ± 3.0 | 10.8 ± 4.7 | |
| TC96500 | MtBCP1 | 5.0 ± 1.2 | 3.9 ± 1.7 | |
| TC100720 | MtGST1 | 96.3 ± 21.6 | 76.9 ± 19.3 | |
| TC106954 | MtSCP1 | 22.0 ± 5.0 | 18.2 ± 4.6 | |
DISCUSSION
In our studies on apocarotenoid biosynthesis, an experimental system of a symbiotic plant-microbe interaction (AM) is employed, which has turned out to be very useful (Walter et al., 2002; Hans et al., 2004; Floss et al., 2008). First, apocarotenoid biosynthesis in roots is inducible upon colonization by AM fungi and leads to massive accumulation of apocarotenoids. This proceeds in an apparently cell-specific manner related to the occurrence of fungal arbuscules (Fester et al., 2002a; Floss et al., 2008). Second, this accumulation involves transcriptional up-regulation of various steps of carotenoid biosynthesis and cleavage (Walter et al., 2000, 2002; Fester et al., 2002b; Hans et al., 2004; Sun et al., 2008; Table I). Third and most important for this study, the metabolic fate of primary carotenoid cleavage products is different from that in other systems. In the mycorrhizal root system used here, both the C13 and C14 cleavage products are easily traceable as oxidized and further modified downstream metabolites. In particular, the central C14 linear product of C40 carotenoid cleavage is converted to a stable yellow dicarboxylic acid (mycorradicin) usually accumulating in esterified form (Fester et al., 2002a). The ratio of C13 to C14 apocarotenoid end products in mycorrhizal roots exhibits large variations ranging from 0.4 to 0.5 in the system used here (Fig. 3) through values of 1 to 2 in AM wild-type roots of M. truncatula or in AM cereal roots (Walter et al., 2000; Schliemann et al., 2008a) to as high as 27 in AM Allium porrum roots (Schliemann et al., 2008b). These fluctuations argue for a variable metabolic fate of apocarotenoids in mycorrhizal roots of individual plant species. In other nonmycorrhizal systems, the C14 primary cleavage product often escapes detection, since it is further metabolized to unknown products or is not volatile enough for gas chromatography-MS analysis (Auldridge et al., 2006a; Ibdah et al., 2006; Sun et al., 2008). One alternative system, in which the fate of the C14 product has been investigated to some extent, is the rose petal, where a reduced C14 dialdehyde downstream product has been identified: the diol rosafluene. This dialcohol has been characterized as being colorless and unstable (Eugster and Märki-Fischer, 1991), as opposed to the oxidized C14 metabolite mycorradicin and its derivatives.
In this system of easy traceability of all predicted carotenoid cleavage products, we could clearly recognize a differential reduction of C13 and C14 metabolites upon knockdown of MtCCD1 expression in mycorrhizal hairy roots of M. truncatula. The C14 cleavage products (mycorradicin derivatives) were strongly reduced almost to the limits of detection upon strong repression of MtCCD1, whereas the C13 cleavage products (cyclohexenone derivatives) were only reduced to about 30% to 50% of the levels of EV controls (Fig. 3). This suggests that mycorradicin biogenesis depends on MtCCD1 activity but also that only one of the two C13 cleavage products expected from the presumed symmetrical cleavage of C40 carotenoid precursors (Fig. 1) originates from this activity. The other one appears to be generated by the action of a different enzyme. The results obtained from two extensive experiments of MtCCD1 silencing with many biological replicates are clearly contradictory to the hitherto discussed scheme of CCD1 action (Fig. 1).
Concomitant with the differential reduction of C13 and C14 apocarotenoids, a conspicuous color change was observed as a consequence of MtCCD1 repression. The rather faint orange-brown coloration of mycorrhizal EV control roots related to mycorradicin derivative accumulation was modified to a clearly more intense yellow-orange root color, indicating the accumulation of a different abundant chromophore (Fig. 4). This coloration also differed from the bright yellow color frequently observed in many cereal roots after mycorrhization, indicating massive accumulation of mycorradicin derivatives (Klingner et al., 1995; Walter et al., 2000). Root extraction and analysis by HPLC revealed the emergence of at least seven novel compounds in mycorrhizal RNAi roots (Fig. 5). Their UV spectra were similar to those of C27 apocarotenoid structural variants recently reported with single absorption maxima between 428 and 440 nm (Cooper et al., 2003). In particular, these spectra matched most closely to several C27 carboxylic acids reported by those authors. There was no indication of an accumulation of C40 carotenoids, which had been expected at the outset of our studies based on the previous hypothesis of CCD1 action (Fig. 1).
The methanolic extracts of RNAi roots were subjected to alkaline hydrolysis, resulting in only two major compounds again exhibiting characteristics of C27 apocarotenoids (Fig. 6). Based on ESI-MS and MS/MS, the structure of Apo2 was proposed to be a C27 carboxylic acid (3-hydroxy-α-apo-10′-carotenoic acid) linked with two hexose moieties at the 3-hydroxy position of the cyclohexene ring (Fig. 7). At least three key fragments (m/z 409, 391, and 269) conform precisely to major fragments obtained earlier by atmospheric pressure chemical ionization MS and MS/MS from a nonglycosylated 3-hydroxy-β-apo-10′-carotenoic acid (Cooper et al., 2003), corroborating the proposed structure. While there is still ambiguity on the position of the double bond in the cyclohexene ring (β- or α-ionone type), the α-ionone (ε-ring) type appears to be more likely. It has always been found in structural analyses of C13 cyclohexenone derivatives obtained from mycorrhizal roots (Strack and Fester, 2006; Walter et al., 2007). In addition, there is no explanation yet for the origin of the keto group in these derivatives. Therefore, the tentatively proposed but still unknown precursor for the AM-induced apocarotenoids is likely to be neither zeaxanthin (β,β-carotene rings) nor lutein (β,ε-rings). Whether the less common xanthophyll lactucaxanthin (Cunningham and Gantt, 2001) derived from ε,ε-carotene containing two α-ionone-like rings (ε-rings) is involved in this pathway is currently a rather speculative assumption. The C27 3-hydroxy-α-apo-10′-carotenoic acid is an intermediate predicted to be formed analogous to mycorradicin by a single instead of a double cleavage of this proposed xanthophyll precursor. The 3-hydroxy position of the C27 compound was found to be glycosylated in the extracts from RNAi roots, as opposed to the C13 cyclohexenone derivatives containing a keto group, indicating that its conversion into the keto group in the cyclohexene moiety may not be possible with the C27 apocarotenoid intermediate. MtCCD1 thus appears to catalyze the C27 → C14 + C13 cleavage but not the C40 → C27 + C13 cleavage. Taken together, there is ample evidence for the accumulation of several C27 apocarotenoids, most probably differently esterified, in mycorrhizal roots caused by silencing of MtCCD1 expression. C27 apocarotenoids have never been observed in wild-type mycorrhizal roots. Derivatives of C27 apocarotenoid core structures have only occasionally been identified in plants, perhaps due to the abundant activities of CCD1 enzymes in many plant tissues (Simkin et al., 2004b; Auldridge et al., 2006a). Examples for natural C27 apocarotenoid occurrence, either as carboxylic acids or as alcohols, are flowers of Boronia megastigma (Cooper et al., 2003), rose petals (Eugster and Märki-Fischer, 1991), and roots of Escobedia scabrifolia (azafrin; Kuhn and Brockmann, 1935).
The emergence of C27 apocarotenoids and not, as expected, C40 carotenoids upon blocking MtCCD1 gene expression in mycorrhizal RNAi roots clearly suggests the C27 apocarotenoids as the substrates of the MtCCD1 enzyme in planta. It further suggests a consecutive two-step cleavage mechanism of carotenoids following the schemes C40 → C27 + C13 and C27 → C14 + C13. Such a mechanism was proposed a number of years ago (Eugster and Märki-Fischer, 1991), but this scheme was abandoned in the wake of many studies on recombinant CCD1 proteins in E. coli showing symmetrical cleavage of a wide variety of C40 carotenoids in vitro. However, the in planta substrate(s) of the enzyme has remained elusive. Interestingly, a recent study on an Arabidopsis CCD1 loss-of-function mutant (ccd1-1) also came up with surprisingly few, if any, changes in precursor C40 carotenoid accumulation in the mutant. Leaf carotenoid levels were completely unchanged. Total seed carotenoid levels were significantly elevated by about 30% (Auldridge et al., 2006a). While this appears to indicate that CCD1 acts on C40 carotenoids at least in seeds, the result could also be explained by a feedback mechanism down-regulating the first cleavage step (C40 → C27 + C13) upon abnormal accumulation of the C27 apocarotenoid intermediate, resulting from failure of the second step (C27 → C14 + C13; CCD1). A potential accumulation of C27 apocarotenoids in the ccd1-1 mutant was not investigated, and a phenotype was not observed. Moreover, in an antisense approach on CCD1 expression in tomato, two transgenic lines with more than 90% reduction in CCD1 transcript levels were obtained, yet the reduction in C13 apocarotenoid volatile emission was only about 50% (Simkin et al., 2004a), reminiscent of the cyclohexenone derivative contents obtained in our study (Fig. 3). Fruit carotenoid content was not affected in these antisense plants. The authors concluded the likely existence of redundant activities for C40 carotenoid cleavage (Simkin et al., 2004a). Similarly, strong cosuppression of PhCCD1 led to unexpectedly high residual levels of 24% to 42% in C13 β-ionone emission from petunia (Petunia hybrida) flowers (Simkin et al., 2004b). The conclusion of these authors for additional players in C40 carotenoid cleavage is supported by our data, but with the crucial difference that this is likely not a redundant but a complementary activity of at least two players in a cleavage process of C40 to C14 and C13 compounds in two consecutive steps. The results obtained with the mycorrhizal root system, therefore, may be of general importance for the mechanisms of carotenoid cleavage in planta. Further supportive evidence comes from an in vitro study on recombinant AtCCD1 showing C13 β-ionone formation using a C30 apocarotenoid as substrate (Schmidt et al., 2006). Moreover, recent studies in the cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. PCC 7120 demonstrated the preference of a recombinant NosCCD (identical to previous NSC1) for cyanobacterial monocyclic C40 xanthophyll substrates compared with bicyclic xanthophylls like zeaxanthin or canthaxanthin (Marasco et al., 2006; Scherzinger and Al-Babili, 2008). The NosCCD, structurally related to plant CCD1, also exhibits strong apocarotenal cleavage activity for both C30 3-hydroxy-β-apo-8′-carotenal and C27 3-hydroxy-β-apo-10′-carotenal (Scherzinger and Al-Babili, 2008). These findings corroborate the notion that the major substrates for CCD1 enzymes in planta may not be C40 carotenoids but rather C27 apocarotenoid compounds.
Proposed organization of C40 carotenoid formation and cleavage to apocarotenoids in a compartmentalized mycorrhizal root cell. C40 carotenoids (exemplified by lactucaxanthin as the tentatively proposed precursor for AM-induced apocarotenoids) synthesized inside plastids are proposed to be cleaved by plastidial CCD7 to one C27 aldehyde and one C13 ketone intermediate, which both can be exported into the cytosol in an unmodified or modified state (white arrows). The C27 intermediate in the cytosol is further cleaved by CCD1 to a C14 and a second molecule of C13, which are, together with the first C13 molecule, modified to yield the oxidized C13 and C14 apocarotenoids (cyclohexenone and mycorradicin derivatives) found in mycorrhizal roots. For abbreviations, see Figure 1.
What then could be the elusive CCD enzyme to perform the first cleavage step and generate C27 from C40 inside the plastid? One certainly cannot fully exclude the existence of an unknown novel CCD, but this CCD should then be completely unrelated in amino acid sequence to the existing nine CCD classes. This is considered rather unlikely. From the known CCDs, a prime candidate is CCD7, with the required 9,10 double bond cleavage specificity and a reported plastidial location. So far, only recombinant AtCCD7 has been shown to cleave C40 to C27 in E. coli (Schwartz et al., 2004). Native CCD7 (MAX3) is involved in one of two consecutive cleavage reactions necessary for the generation of a novel carotenoid-derived hormone. This hormone acting as an inhibitor of shoot branching is generated by the genes of the max pathway of Arabidopsis and by orthologous genes in many other plants, exemplified by rms5 in pea (Pisum sativum) and htd1 in rice (Oryza sativa; Booker et al., 2004, 2005; Snowden et al., 2005; Johnson et al., 2006; Zou et al., 2006; Mouchel and Leyser, 2007). The second cleavage activity required for the biosynthesis of the branching inhibitor is contributed by CCD8. Schwartz et al. (2004) showed cleavage activity of a recombinant AtCCD8 on a C27 substrate, resulting in C18 and C9 cleavage products. On the other hand, Auldridge et al. (2006a) reported cleavage of C40 carotenoid substrates to unknown products by recombinant AtCCD8.
More recently, the strict specificity of CCD8 for certain C27 compounds (β-apo-10′-carotenal and its alcohol), the conservation of this specificity in monocot and dicot species, and the nature of the C18 product (β-apo-13-carotenone) have been further elucidated (Alder et al., 2008). AtCCD7, however, cleaves multiple C40 carotenoids, including lycopene, β-carotene, and zeaxanthin (Booker et al., 2004), leading to the prospect that its biological function is not limited to the formation of the branching inhibitor (Alder et al., 2008). In addition, while double mutants of Arabidopsis ccd7 (max3-11) and ccd8 (max4-6) were phenotypically indistinguishable from either single mutant, a quantitative dosage effect of ccd8 heterozygotes on the branching phenotype argues for CCD8 activity as a limiting step in the pathway (Auldridge et al., 2006a). The reported strict specificity of CCD8 for the conversion of C27 β-apo-10′-carotenal and its inability to convert 3-hydroxy-β-apo-10′-carotenal (Alder et al., 2008) appear to preclude a common C27 precursor for both the branching inhibitor and mycorrhizal apocarotenoids. In support of this preliminary conclusion, we have never observed an obvious branching phenotype on strongly mycorrhized plants, which might possibly arise from depleted C27 common precursor pools. The data available at present are thus in agreement with CCD8 catalyzing a specific step in a side route from C27 to the branching inhibitor, while CCD7 might be required for both branching inhibitor and mycorrhizal apocarotenoid biosynthesis (Fig. 9). Finally, while this article was under revision, two reports became available online, suggesting strigolactones as the long sought after carotenoid-derived branching inhibitor hormone and confirming the specific role of CCD8 in its synthesis (Gomez-Roldan et al., 2008; Umehara et al., 2008).
Based on other very recent data, CCD4 must now also be considered a potential player for the in planta generation of C27 apocarotenoids. Earlier investigations have attributed 7,8 (7′,8′) cleavage activity to a CsZCD of saffron, representing an incomplete CsCCD4 sequence (Bouvier et al., 2003), but the aforementioned recent work now reports β-ionone formation from recombinant full-length CsCCD4 acting on β-carotene as a substrate in E. coli, which implies 9,10 and/or 9,10 (9′,10′) cleavage activity (Rubio et al., 2008). CCD4 also fulfills the condition of having a proven localization within plastids in plastoglobules (Ytterberg et al., 2006), but it has not been shown to produce C27 apocarotenoids in vitro. As for the in planta action of CCD4, an RNAi-silencing approach on CCD4 expression in white-petal cultivars of Chrysanthemum morifolium resulted in the generation of yellow petals, which indicates that the white-petal phenotype is brought about by carotenoid degradation (Ohmiya et al., 2006). Loss of function of CCD4 thus strongly increased carotenoid content in Chrysanthemum petals as opposed to no or minor effects upon silencing or mutating CCD1 genes (Simkin et al., 2004a, 2004b; Auldridge et al., 2006a).
While one cannot make a safe case for either CCD7 or CCD4 as the missing player for the C40 → C27 cleavage at this time, there are a couple of arguments favoring CCD7 at least for the mycorrhizal apocarotenoids. Mining of the extensive M. truncatula EST databases does not indicate the presence of MtCCD4-related transcripts in roots or mycorrhizal roots, whereas 18 ESTs can be identified from leaf, stem, and pod libraries. Lack of root expression and strong expression in flower or reproductive tissues has also been reported for Chrysanthemum and saffron CCD4 genes (Ohmiya et al., 2006; Rubio et al., 2008). On the contrary, CCD7 and CCD8 are preferentially expressed in roots (Booker et al., 2004; Snowden et al., 2005; Auldridge et al. 2006a). Preliminary analyses in our laboratory of transcript levels of CCD7-like sequences by RT-PCR in nonmycorrhizal and mycorrhizal roots of M. truncatula also demonstrated their fairly abundant presence in these tissues. Furthermore, preliminary supportive evidence for a role of CCD7 in mycorrhizal roots is now available from an analysis of mycorrhizal rms5 (CCD7) mutant plants of pea (for their origin, see Johnson et al., 2006), which exhibited strongly reduced levels of C13 cyclohexenone and C14 mycorradicin derivatives compared with mycorrhizal wild-type plants (M.H. Walter, unpublished data).
Besides clarifying the role of CCD1 in the biosynthesis of cyclohexenone and mycorradicin derivatives, our RNAi approach was also meant to elucidate potential functions of either of these apocarotenoids in the AM symbiosis. Such functions might be revealed by the reduction or lack of these compounds in roots of RNAi plants. To proceed toward this goal, we determined the transcript levels of several AM molecular markers. However, neither MtPT4 nor any of the other markers showed a strong decrease (Table II) comparable to the strong down-regulation recently obtained by strong silencing of MtDXS2 (Floss et al., 2008). Then again, the differential reduction of cyclohexenone and mycorradicin derivatives constitutes an opportunity to enter into a discussion on which of the two apocarotenoids might be a major player in the AM symbiosis. Despite strong reduction of mycorradicin derivative levels in MtCCD1 RNAi roots (Fig. 3), the AM molecular markers were largely unaltered (Table II), arguing against a contribution of mycorradicin to the effect on these markers. On the contrary, cyclohexenone derivative levels were reduced to only 30% to 50% of those of EV controls (Fig. 3), which might simply not be sufficient to strongly affect AM marker gene expression. Extensive reduction of cyclohexenone derivative levels as accomplished by strong MtDXS2 silencing reproducibly led to a dramatic abolishment of AM-induced plant marker gene expression (Floss et al., 2008). In the MtCCD1-silenced roots used here, one of the AM markers (MtLEC7) exhibited a minor, but significant, down-regulation (Table II). Interestingly, this marker was also negatively affected in roots moderately silenced for MtDXS2 expression, while all other markers were unaltered (Floss et al., 2008). The outcome of strong repression of MtCCD1 thus appears to be similar to the moderate repression of MtDXS2, which both share moderately but not strongly reduced levels of cyclohexenone derivatives (Table II; Floss et al., 2008).
While any consequences of the strong silencing of MtCCD1 on AM molecular markers were hardly detectable, a commonality to MtDXS2 silencing was the significant increase in older, degenerating arbuscules (Fig. 8D; Floss et al., 2008). Again, these alterations follow quantitatively the moderate alterations of cyclohexenone derivatives in MtCCD1-silenced roots more closely than the strongly decreased levels of mycorradicin derivatives. Only a further reduction of cyclohexenone derivatives, as achieved in the MtDXS2-silencing approach, led to a more pronounced effect on the numbers of degenerating arbuscules and added an increase in dead arbuscules (Floss et al., 2008). Additional experiments recently indicated that with the MtDXS2 target, moderate levels of silencing and cyclohexenone derivative reduction can also bring about an increase in the number of degenerating arbuscules independent of the strong drop in AM marker transcript levels (D.S. Floss and M.H. Walter, unpublished data). These results lend further support to a possible link between the moderate reduction of cyclohexenone derivative levels (Fig. 3) and the moderate increase in arbuscules at the degenerating stage (Fig. 8D). Both of the observations of changes of AM marker transcript levels and of the number of degenerating arbuscules are thus compatible with a role of cyclohexenones in these two instances, which is in agreement with previous arguments (Walter et al., 2007). Mycorradicin derivatives accumulate massively next to degenerating arbuscules within osmiophilic droplets finally located to vacuoles (Fester et al., 2002a). These derivatives might have other functions in the decay and reemergence of arbuscules, but they seem to be not directly involved in regulating the number of physiologically active arbuscules.
CONCLUSION
While the definite roles of cyclohexenone and mycorradicin derivatives in the AM symbiosis still need to be clarified, this report sheds new light on the mechanism of carotenoid cleavage and on its compartmentation in plant cells. It is now most interesting to search for C27 apocarotenoids accumulating in other CCD1-repressed plants or respective mutants. Moreover, a potential contribution of CCD7 and/or CCD4 to the generation of flower scents, fruit aromas, or the flavor of wines complementing CCD1 activities (Simkin et al., 2004a; Mathieu et al., 2005) will now be a promising area to study. For mycorrhizal research, the CCD7 gene will constitute a new target to modify the levels of mycorrhizal apocarotenoids and to finally elucidate their function in the AM symbiosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant Cultivation and Fungal Inoculation
Medicago truncatula var. Jemalong was cultivated in pots on expanded clay substrate (Lecaton; Fibo Exclay) in a greenhouse during the months of June and July (RNAi experiments) or December and January (wild-type cultivation) with a 16-h daily light period. Plants were supplied with deionized water three times per week and with a phosphate-reduced fertilizer (10 mL of half-strength Long Ashton medium, 20% of regular phosphate) once a week. Seven-day-old wild-type plantlets or 6-week old plants from hairy root transformation with transgenic root systems and wild-type shoots were inoculated with the AM fungus Glomus intraradices isolate 49 provided by H. von Alten (University of Hannover; Maier et al., 1995). This was done by transferring to clay substrate containing 30% (v/v) fungal inoculum enriched in propagules by previous cocultivation with Allium porrum ‘Elefant’ as described (Floss et al., 2008).
MtCCD1 cDNA Cloning and Expression in Escherichia coli
An 825-bp fragment of a MtCCD1 cDNA was amplified from mycorrhizal root RNA of M. truncatula using the primers MtCCD1c-fw (5′-AGCTGTTGATTTATTGGAGAAG-3′) and MtCCD1c-re (5′-ATCAGTGTCTTATTCTTCACC-3′) deduced from TC100912 of the DFCI M. truncatula gene index (version 8; http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/cgi-bin/tgi/gimain.pl?gudb=medicago). This fragment was used as a probe to screen a cDNA library from M. truncatula mycorrhizal roots as described (Walter et al., 2002). Several full-length clones with sequence identity to TC100912 were obtained.
For bacterial expression, the coding sequence of MtCCD1 was amplified from the cDNA using the primers MtCCD1ex-fw (5′-TATCCATGGAGTCTGAGAAAATAGGAGG-3′) and MtCCD1ex-re (5′-TATCTCGAGCAGTTTAGCTTGTTCTTG-3′) and cloned in the NcoI and XhoI sites of the expression vector pET-28a(+). A second construct including a C-terminal His tag was generated using the same MtCCD1ex-fw primer but the reverse primer MtCCD1ex-His-re (5′-TATCTCGAGTTACAGTTTAGCTTGTTCTTG-3′). Expression was done in E. coli strain BL21(D3) containing either the pAC-BETA or the pAC-ZEAX plasmid (Cunningham et al., 1996; Sun et al., 1996). Transformation was also done with pET-28(+) as an EV control. The various E. coli strains raised in suspension cultures were streaked on agar plates containing 50 mg mL−1 ampicillin and 0.1 mm isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside to reveal decoloration of carotenoids through recombinant MtCCD1 activity.
Generation of the RNAi Construct and Hairy Root Transformation
To generate an MtCCD1-RNAi construct, a 335-bp region covering 229 bp of 3′ coding and 106 bp of 3′ untranslated sequences was amplified from the cDNA by primers MtCCD1-RNAi-fw (5′-TATACTAGTGGCGCGCCTCTGAGGCTGTTTATGTTCC-3′) and MtCCD-RNAi-re (5′-TATGGATCCATTTAAATCTCTACTGCATTGTAGAATATCC-3′) and cloned into the SpeI-AscI and BamHI-SwaI sites of the pRNAi vector carrying DsRED1 as a fluorescent marker (Limpens et al., 2004). Details of the cloning process and further steps of construct introduction into Agrobacterium rhizogenes ArquaI as well as the hairy root transformation procedure have been described (Floss et al., 2008). Briefly, 7-d-old M. truncatula seedlings were injected with small volumes of bacterial culture (50–100 μL) three to five times into their hypocotyls. Seedlings were transferred into humid expanded clay for a 2-d recovery and then placed in a growth chamber (20°C, 16 h of light/8 h of dark) for 2 weeks, after which emerging hairy roots were covered by a vermiculite:sand (1:1) mixture. Four weeks after A. rhizogenes injection, a first screen for DsRED1 fluorescent roots was performed with a fluorescence stereomicroscope (Leica MZ FLIII with a DsRED1 filter), removing from each plant individually all nonfluorescent hairy roots as well as the wild-type roots. A second screen was carried out after a further 2 weeks of cultivation. Composite plants carrying exclusively transgenic roots were then inoculated with G. intraradices and further cultivated as described above.
Metabolite Analyses
Homogenized root samples (200 mg) from individual plants were each extracted three times with 400 μL of 80% aqueous methanol. After centrifugation, the supernatants were analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC to determine the levels of cyclohexenone derivatives (Schliemann et al., 2008a). For mycorradicin derivative quantification, 300 μL of the methanolic extracts was adjusted with potassium hydroxide to a final concentration of 0.5 m and processed as described (Fester et al., 2002a; Floss et al., 2008). Compounds were detected at 245 nm (cyclohexenone derivatives) or 377 nm (mycorradicin and its derivatives) and quantified by the external standards ABA and mycorradicin dimethyl ester.
The separation of C27 apocarotenoids in methanolic extracts was carried out in a similar manner on a 5-μm nucleosil C18 column (250 × 4 mm i.d.; Macherey-Nagel) using a solvent system consisting of solvent A (1.5% [v/v] aqueous H3PO4)/solvent B (acetonitrile) and a constant gradient from 0% B to 100% B (in A + B) within 60 min. Alkaline hydrolysis was done as described for mycorradicin, and reaction products were separated by applying a constant gradient from 0% to 100% B within 35 min followed by a 4-min hold and a rapid switch to 0% B within 1 min. For semipreparative HPLC, 1.5% aqueous H3PO4 was replaced by 2% formic acid and by a gradient raising solvent B from 0% to 100% within 35 min.
The high-resolution ESI mass spectra (ESI-FTICR-MS) of fractions Apo1 and Apo2 isolated after alkaline hydrolysis were obtained from a Bruker Apex III Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) equipped with an Infinity cell, a 7.0-tesla superconducting magnet (Bruker), a radiofrequency-only hexapole ion guide, and an Apollo electrospray ion source (Agilent; off axis spray). Nitrogen was used as a drying gas at 150°C. The sample solutions were introduced continuously via a syringe pump with a flow rate of 120 μL h−1. The m/z value obtained for Apo2 was 733.37944 [M + H]+, calculated for C39H57O13 + 733.37937.
The positive ion ESI mass spectra of Apo2 were obtained from a Finnigan MAT TSQ Quantum Ultra AM system equipped with a hot ESI source (electrospray voltage, 3.0 kV; sheath gas, nitrogen; vaporizer temperature, 50°C; capillary temperature, 250°C). The MS system was coupled with a Surveyor Plus Micro-HPLC (Thermo Electron) equipped with a Ultrasep ES RP18E column (5 μm, 1 × 100 mm; SepServ). For HPLC, a gradient system was used starting from solvent C (90% water/10% acetonitrile, each of them containing 0.2% acetic acid) to solvent D (5% water/95% acetonitrile) within 15 min followed by a hold at 5% water/95% acetonitrile for a further 15 min with a flow rate of 50 μL min−1. The CID mass spectra of Apo2 [M + H]+ ions at m/z 733 (retention time, 19.7 min) were recorded during the HPLC run with collision energies of 15 and 25 eV, respectively (collision gas, argon; collision pressure, 1.5 mTorr).
For Apo2: 15-eV ESI-CID mass spectrum [m/z, relative intensity (%)]: 733 [M + H]+ (10), 715 (8), 571 ([M + H − C6H10O5 (hexose moiety)]+ (22), 553 (8), 409 ([M + H − 2 × C6H10O5]+ (75), 391 [M + H − 2 × C6H10O5 − H2O]+ (100), 373 (8).
For Apo2: 25-eV ESI-CID mass spectrum [m/z, relative intensity (%)]: 733 [M + H]+ (7), 409 ([M + H − 2 × 162 (hexose moiety)]+ (43), 391[M + H − 2 × 162-H2O]+ (29), 291 (17), 269 (100), 210 (47), 209 (29), 201 (61), 187 (41), 185 (35), 145 (12).
Root Staining Procedures and Microscopic Evaluation of Fungal Structures
Root fractions from a defined part of the root systems (center) were stained by 5% ink (Sheaffer skrip jet black; Sheaffer Manufacturing) in 2% acetic acid (Vierheilig et al., 1998). Root colonization, fungal structures, and arbuscule abundance were assessed using a stereomicroscope. The results were evaluated using the software Mycocalc according to Trouvelot et al. (1986). For experiment I, additional root aliquots were stained with 0.01% acid-fuchsin in lactoglycerol (lactic acid:glycerol:water, 1:1:1 [v/v/v]). Further details of subsequent visualization and classification of fungal arbuscules by confocal scanning microscopy (LSM 510 Meta; Zeiss) using the 543-nm laser line for excitation have been described elsewhere (Floss et al., 2008).
Real-Time RT-PCR
Total RNA was prepared using the Qiagen RNeasy Plant Mini Kit followed by DNase digestion (RNase-free DNase Set; Qiagen). RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA with M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase RNase H Minus, Point Mutant (Promega) using oligo(dT) 19 primers. Real-time RT-PCR assays were performed using a SYBR Green-based kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Applied Biosystems). Five nanograms of reverse-transcribed cDNA and 100 nm primers were used and assayed in a Mx 3005P QPCR system (Stratagene) using conditions and primer sets recently described (Floss et al., 2008). Briefly, the primer information for the four most important genes is given here: MtCCD1-qPCR-fw, 5′-TTCGGTGTTCTACCCCGCTAT-3′; MtCCD1-qPCR-re, 5′-AGGCGGCATGTGATCAAAC-3′; MtDXS2-1-qPCR-fw, 5′-CACCTTGGATACATAAATCATTAAGTC-3′; MtDXS2-1-qPCR-re, 5′-CGAATCTCTTCTCTCAACCAAGA-3′; MtEF-qPCR-fw, 5′-AGAAGGAAGCTGCTGAGATGAAC-3′; MtEF-qPCR-re, 5′-TGACTGTGCAGTAGTACTTGGTG-3′; MtPT4-qPCR-fw, 5′-ACAAATTTGATAGGATTCTTTTGCACGT-3′; MtPT4-qPCR-re, 5′-TCACATCTTCTCAGTTCTTGAGTC-3′.
The relative transcription (EΔCt) was calculated by subtracting the Ct values of the target gene from the arithmetic mean cycle threshold (Ct) value of the normalizing translation elongation factor of M. truncatula (MtEF) obtained from three technical replicates. The efficiency of each PCR was determined by import of the fluorescence data into the LinReg PCR software (Ramakers et al., 2003).
Statistical Analysis
Data were evaluated for normal distribution and, if positive, a one-way test was performed, which at homogeneity of variance corresponds to ANOVA. If data did not comply with a normal distribution, the Kruskal-Wallis test was applied. The graphs show mean and sd values of individual transgenic root systems transformed by EV or the RNAi constructs of single composite plants.
Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under accession number FM204879 (MtCCD1).
Supplemental Data
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
Supplemental Figure S1. Alignment of amino acid sequences from 14 plant CCD1 proteins, including MtCCD1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank M.J. Harrison (Boyce Thompson Institute) for providing the M. truncatula cDNA library; R. Geurts (Wageningen University) for providing pRedRoot and pRNAi; C. Rameau (INRA) for providing pea rms5 mutant seeds, and H. Bothe (Cologne University) for providing the mycorradicin dimethyl ester standard. The skillful technical assistance of K. Manke and C. Kuhnt (Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzenbiochemie) is gratefully acknowledged.
LITERATURE CITED
Akiyama K (
Akiyama K, Matsuzaki KI, Hayashi H (
Alder A, Holdermann I, Beyer P, Al-Babili S (
Alexander T, Meier R, Toth R, Weber HC (
Auldridge ME, Block A, Vogel JT, Dabney-Smith C, Mila I, Bouzayen M, Magallanes-Lundback M, DellaPenna D, McCarty DR, Klee HJ (
Auldridge ME, McCarty DR, Klee HJ (
Booker J, Auldridge M, Wills S, McCarty D, Klee H, Leyser O (
Booker J, Sieberer T, Wright W, Williamson L, Willett B, Stirnberg P, Turnbull C, Srinivasan M, Goddarad P, Leyser O (
Bouvier F, Isner JC, Dogbo O, Camara B (
Bouvier F, Suire C, Mutterer J, Camara B (
Cooper CM, Davies NW, Menary RC (
Cunningham FX Jr, Gantt E (
Cunningham FX Jr, Pogson B, Sun Z, McDonald KA, DellaPenna D, Gantt E (
Eugster CH, Märki-Fischer E (
Fester T, Hause B, Schmidt D, Halfmann K, Schmidt J, Wray V, Hause G, Strack D (
Fester T, Schmidt D, Lohse S, Walter MH, Giuliano G, Bramley PM, Fraser PD, Hause B, Strack D (
Fester T, Wray V, Nimtz M, Strack D (
Floss DS, Hause B, Lange PR, Küster H, Strack D, Walter MH (
Frenzel A, Manthey K, Perlick AM, Meyer F, Pühler A, Küster H, Krajinski F (
Giuliano G, Al-Babili S, von Lintig J (
Gomez-Roldan V, Fermas S, Brewer PB, Puech-Pagès V, Dun EA, Pillot JP, Letisse F, Matusova R, Danoun S, Portais JC, et al (
Hans J, Hause B, Fester T, Strack D, Walter MH (
Harrison MJ, Dewbre GR, Liu J (
Hirschberg J (
Hohnjec N, Vieweg MF, Pühler A, Becker A, Küster H (
Huhman DV, Berhow MA, Sumner LW (
Huhman DV, Sumner LW (
Ibdah M, Azulay Y, Portnoy V, Wasserman B, Bar E, Meir A, Burger Y, Hirschberg J, Schaffer AA, Katzir N, et al (
Javot H, Penmetsa RV, Terzaghi N, Cook DR, Harrison MJ (
Johnson X, Brcich T, Dun EA, Goussot M, Haurogné K, Beveridge CA, Rameau C (
Kato M, Matsumoto H, Ikoma Y, Okuda H, Yano M (
Klingner A, Bothe H, Wray V, Marner FJ (
Kloer DP, Schulz GE (
Kuhn R, Brockmann H (
Lewinsohn E, Sitrit Y, Bar E, Azulay Y, Ibdah M, Meir A, Yosef E, Zamir D, Tadmor Y (
Limpens E, Ramos J, Franken C, Raz V, Compaan B, Fransen H, Bisseling T, Geurts R (
Lohse S, Schliemann W, Ammer C, Kopka J, Strack D, Fester T (
Maier W, Peipp H, Schmidt J, Wray V, Strack D (
Marasco EK, Vay K, Schmidt-Dannert, C (
Mathieu S, Terrier N, Procureur J, Bigey F, Günata Z (
Matusova R, Rani K, Verstappen FWA, Franssen MCR, Beale MH, Bouwmeester H (
Mouchel CF, Leyser O (
Nambara E, Marion-Poll A (
Ohmiya A, Kishimoto S, Aida R, Yoshioka S, Sumimoto K (
Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Lekanne Deprez RH, Moormann FM (
Rodríguez-Concepción M, Boronat A (
Rubio A, Rambla JL, Santaella M, Gómez MD, Orzaez D, Granell A, Gómez-Gómez L (
Scherzinger D, Al-Babili S (
Schliemann W, Ammer C, Strack D (
Schliemann W, Kolbe B, Schmidt J, Nimtz M, Wray V (
Schmidt H, Kurtzer R, Eisenreich W, Schwab W (
Schwartz SH, Qin X, Loewen MC (
Schwartz SH, Qin X, Zeevaart JA (
Schwartz SH, Tan BC, Gage DA, Zeevaart JA, McCarty DR (
Simkin AJ, Schwartz SH, Auldridge M, Taylor MG, Klee HJ (
Simkin AJ, Underwood BA, Auldridge M, Loucas HM, Shibuya K, Schmelz E, Clark DG, Klee HJ (
Snowden KC, Simkin AJ, Janssen BJ, Templeton KR, Loucas HM, Simons JL, Karunairetnam S, Gleave AP, Clark DG, Klee HJ (
Strack D, Fester T (
Sun Z, Gantt E, Cunningham FX Jr (
Sun Z, Hans J, Walter MH, Matusova R, Beekwilder J, Verstappen FWA, Ming Z, van Echtelt E, Strack D, Bisseling T, et al (
Tan BC, Joseph LM, Deng WT, Liu L, Li QB, Cline K, McCarty DR (
Trouvelot A, Kough JL, Gianinazzi-Pearson V (
Umehara M, Hanada A, Yoshida S, Akiyama K, Arite T, Takeda-Kamiya N, Magome H, Kamiya Y, Shirasu K, Yoneyama K, et al (
Vierheilig H, Coughlan AP, Wyss U, Piché Y (
Vogel JT, Tan BC, McCarty DR, Klee HJ (
Walter MH, Fester T, Strack D (
Walter MH, Floss DS, Hans J, Fester T, Strack D (
Walter MH, Hans J, Strack D (
Yokoyama H, White MJ (
Ytterberg AJ, Peltier JP, van Wijk K (
Zou J, Zhang S, Zhang W, Li G, Chen Z, Zhai W, Zhao X, Pan X, Xie Q, Zhu L (
Author notes
This work was supported in part by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bonn) in the priority program SPP 1084 (MolMyk).
Corresponding author; e-mail mhwalter@ipb-halle.de.
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Michael H. Walter (mhwalter@ipb-halle.de).
The online version of this article contains Web-only data.
Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.






![Mass spectral analysis of compound Apo2. A, Scheme of the proposed fragmentation of compound Apo2, whose proposed structure is shown at top left. Apo2 exhibits a m/z of 733 [M + H]+. Removing one or two hexose residues (increments of 162) results in fragments with m/z 571 and 409. Splitting of the aglycone next to the cyclohexene ring is proposed to yield fragment a (m/z 269). Additional fragments may be derived from fragmentation in the linear side chain of the Apo2 aglycone (m/z 391) at the positions indicated, resulting in fragments of m/z 201 (b) or m/z 187 (c). B and C, ESI-CID mass spectra of Apo2 (B, 15 eV; C, 25 eV).](https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/plphys/148/3/10.1104_pp.108.125062/3/m_plphys_v148_3_1267_f7.jpeg?Expires=1712714981&Signature=CLJCDCRA8GXzJy~B6Hy3qQiopTqaPsbAo0z21wTBdQMf-ACUs2V-eoRlt2BFWuSHhbVE1~T8Ftg3ZuR~nbAj1QoXeSsbuAZBghpcZa8Sfn-mxApx~UkCw4scnFvJMvjKv3MKDr-h2GBBHhHozrVhcNhAHAtN6opRec~2pk6TXL9bqLPl1x2UlL6KsMQt5J~MrmexazWHVDybARyAY2BbyPb40TefreC3GAeMpgsX-DdchYPbUp5kyBFQMB5YhVsyj-0J4hnczW3y3ldKs2IqEhpyEpHLbHymwEo7NUSy1Yo21ZcFX6j73WdQc8kvVLTGCI7-sC3Rlyk7TJd7Vf0EoA__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA)

