Abstract

An effective residual interaction of the shell model is investigated by maing use of the experimental values of the pairing energies P(j) = B E.(Z, N) + B E.(Z, N - 2) - 2B E.(Z, N - 1), and II(j) = 2B E.(Z, N) - B E.(N, N + 1) - B E.(Z, N - 1). It is assumed that the effective interactions between paired like nucleons (n-n, p-p) in the same orbit are central forces and have the form Vij = [V0 + V1i · σj)]f(rij), and the Gaussian and Yukawa types are used for f(rij). The strength parameters V0 and V1 are determined from P(j)exp and Π(j)exp in the pure configurations. The results are V1/V0 ∼ 2, then the effective residual interactions are near upon the Rosenfeld force. The effects of tensor force and configuration mixing on V0 and V1 obtained in the case of central force and pure configurations are investigated. The parameters to give nuclear binding energies are evaluated and these values are compared with those given by several authors. A discussion for the effective residual interactions thus obtained are made in this paper.

References

1)
Mayer
M. G.
Phys. Rev.
,
1950
, vol.
78
2)
Nomoto
M.
Prog. Theor. Phys.
,
1957
, vol.
18
3)
Talmi
I
Helv Phys Acta
,
1952
, vol.
25
pg.
185
 
A Arima, Prog Theor Phys 19 (1958),
 
J P Eliott and B H Flowers, Proc Roy Soc A229 (1955), 536.
 
C. Levinson and K. W. Ford, Phys. Rev. 100 (1955),
4)
Schwartz
C.
de-Shalit
A.
Phys. Rev.
,
1954
, vol.
94
5)
Racah
G.
Phys. Rev.
,
1942
, vol.
62
6)
Talmi
I
Helv Phys Acta
,
1952
, vol.
25
pg.
185
 
R Thieberger, Nuclear Phys 2 (1956/1957),
 
K. W. Ford and E. J. Konopinsky, Nucl. Phys. 9 (1958/1959),
 
M. Moshinsky, Nucl. Phys. 13 (1959),
 
R. D. Lawson and M. G. Mayer, Phys. Rev. 117 (1960),
 
A. Arima and T. Terasawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 23 (1960),
 
T. A. Brody, G. Jacob and Moshinsky, Nucl. Phys. 17 (1960),
 
H. Horie and K. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 25 (1960),
7)
Everling
F.
Konig
L. A.
Mattauch
J. H.
Wapstra
A. H.
Nucl. Phys.
,
1960
, vol.
15
8)
Class
C. M.
Davis
R. H.
Johnson
J. H.
Phys. Rev. Letters
,
1959
, vol.
3
9)
Pease
R. L.
Feshbach
H.
Phys. Rev.
,
1951
, vol.
81
10)
Talmi
L.
Phys. Rev.
,
1959
, vol.
107
11)
Talmi
I.
Thieberger
R.
Phys. Rev.
,
1959
, vol.
103
12)
Thieberger
R.
Phys. Rev.
,
1959
, vol.
116
13)
Kalos
M. H.
Biedenharn
L. C.
Blatt
L. M.
Nucl. Phys.
,
1957
, vol.
1
  
P. S. Signell and R. E. Marshak, Phys. Rev. 106 (1957),
 
ibid. 109 (1958),
 
J. L. Gammel and R. M. Thaler, Phys. Rev. 107 (1957),
 
ibid. 107 (1957),
14)
Jackson
J. D.
Blatt
J. M.
Rev. Mod. Phys.
,
1950
, vol.
22
15)
Belyaev
S. T.
Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab. Mat. -fys. Skr.
,
1959
, vol.
31
No 11
 
L. S. Kisslinger and R. A. Sorensen, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab. Mat. -fys. Skr. 32 (1960), No. 9.
 
A. K. Kerman, Ann. of Phys. 12 (1961),
 
A. B. Migdal, Nucl. Phys. 13 (1959),
 
T. Tamura and T. Udagawa, Nucl. Phys. 16 (1960),460[Elsevier]
 
J. J. Griffin and M. Rich, Phys. Rev. 118 (1960),
 
S. G. Nilsson and O. Prior, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab. Mat. -fys. Skr. 32 (1961), No. 16.
This content is only available as a PDF.

Author notes

*)

Now at University of Tokyo, Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo