Abstract

Objectives

There is a call to improve the histological classification of lupus nephritis (LN). We assessed the association between histological lesions and kidney outcomes.

Methods

We assessed 430 participants with biopsy-proven LN diagnosed between 2008 and 2020. All participants had follow-up for ≥3 years. The activity and chronicity lesions comprised in the National Institutes of Health activity and chronicity indices were evaluated for its association with complete response (CR), kidney relapses, and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) by time-to-event analyses. Likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated to define the optimal cutoffs for each parameter.

Results

Activity lesions weakly correlated with clinical parameters at LN flare, but none was associated with time to response or progression to ESKD. Chronicity lesions, except segmental glomerular sclerosis (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.90-1.05 for CR, and HR 1.11, 95%CI 0.99-1.25 for ESKD), were associated with time to complete and partial response and progression to ESKD. Excluding segmental glomerular sclerosis from the chronicity index did not modify its prognostic yield (C-statistic 0.66 and 0.67 for CR and 0.74 and 0.74 for ESKD). Newer cutoffs for each chronicity item were defined by the positive and negative LR ≥ 3.0 or ≤ 0.33, respectively: 0-15%, 16-30%, >30% for interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and 0-5%, 6-30%, >30% for global glomerular sclerosis.

Conclusion

Chronicity lesions in the kidney biopsy, except segmental glomerular sclerosis, are associated with time to complete/partial remission and progression to ESKD. We propose eliminating segmental glomerular sclerosis from the chronicity index and using likelihood ratios to define the cutoffs for each histological lesion.

Information Accepted manuscripts
Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.
This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
You do not currently have access to this article.

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.