Abstract

Background

Fatigue represents a critical priority among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Its effective management is a major unmet clinical need. Existing studies indicate that anti-TNF therapy may reduce fatigue levels, although any effect has yet to be definitively quantified. Moreover, predictors of any such improvements have not been studied.

Methods

The British Society for Rheumatology Register in Axial Spondyloarthritis (BSRBR-AS) prospectively recruited axSpA patients across 83 centres in the UK. Changes in fatigue levels (measured using the Chalder Fatigue Scale (0-33)) over 1 year were compared between those starting anti-TNF therapy at the time of recruitment and those not. Differences between treatment groups were adjusted using propensity score matching. Results were combined with other studies in a meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates. Then, among those BSRBR-AS anti-TNF commencers with clinically relevant fatigue, baseline predictors of response were investigated.

Results

Of the 998 BSRBR-AS recruits with complete fatigue outcome data, 310 were anti-TNF commencers and 688 were not. At 1 year follow-up, the former group reported a mean change in fatigue of -2.6 (95% CI -4.1, -1.9) points while the latter reported a mean worsening of fatigue by 0.2 points. Following propensity score adjustment, those commencing anti-TNF therapy reduced fatigue by 3.0 points compared to those not 95% CI (-4.1-1.9). In the meta-analysis, including 1109 subjects across 5 observational studies and trials, treatment with anti-TNF therapy resulted in a significant improvement in fatigue (SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-1.56). Of those BSRBR-AS recruits commencing anti-TNF, n = 205 (66%) reported clinically significant fatigue at baseline of whom n = 139 (68%) experienced a clinically relevant improvement in their fatigue at 1 year. Poor sleep quality at baseline was predictive of fatigue improvement.

Conclusion

Anti TNF therapy results in a significant but modest reduction in fatigue amongst axSpA patients, with those reporting poor sleep quality most likely to report improvement. Effective management will likely require additional, possibly non-pharmacological, approaches.

Disclosures

J. Shim None. L. Dean None. M. Karabayas None. G. Jones None. G. Macfarlane None. N. Basu None.

This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.