Skip to Main Content

Browse issues

Sexual Medicine Reviews Cover Image for Volume 13, Issue 2
Volume 13, Issue 2
April 2025
ISSN 2050-0513
EISSN 2050-0521

Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025

Editorial

Annamaria Giraldi
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 116–117, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf020

International Consultation on Sexual Medicine Recommendations

Lori A Brotto and others
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 118–143, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae073
Tobias S Köhler and others
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 144–171, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf001
Run Wang and others
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 172–183, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf002

  • 1—Clinicians should offer vacuum erectile device (VED) alone or combined with other therapies for erectile dysfunction (ED) for intercourse, even in difficult to treat populations, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), spinal cord injury, and post-radical prostatectomy (RP). The quality of evidence is moderate. Strength of recommendation: strong.

  • 2—Clinicians should offer VED early in the post-operative setting to maintain penile size following RP. The quality of evidence is moderate. Strength of recommendation: strong.

  • 3—Clinicians should not offer VED to restore spontaneous erectile function more rapidly or to a greater degree when used as a rehabilitation therapy after RP.

  • The quality of evidence is high. Strength of recommendation: strong.

  • 4—Clinicians may offer VED before or after penile prosthesis implantation to improve surgical outcomes. The quality of evidence is low. Strength of recommendation: weak.

  • 5—Clinicians may offer VED as a primary treatment or combined with other therapies for Peyronie’s disease. The quality of evidence is low. Strength of recommendation: weak.

  • 6—Clinicians should be aware of studies with VED use for female sexual dysfunction, subjective short penis, post proctectomy and after urethroplasty. The quality of evidence is very low. No recommendation can be given due to very limited publications.

Reviews

David L Rowland and Paraskevi-Sofia Kirana
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 184–201, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf012
Ming Liu and others
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 202–210, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf010
Fatemeh Khorasanian and others
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 211–228, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf005
Julius Fink and others
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 229–236, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf013
Rodolfo B S de Almeida and others
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 237–245, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf003
Oluwafolajimi Adesanya and Arthur L Burnett
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 246–255, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf004
Ghada Farouk Mohammed and others
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 256–266, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf006
Elia Abou Chawareb and others
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 267–279, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf009

Perspective

Joana Carvalho and Samuel Silva
Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Pages 280–281, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf008

Correction

Sexual Medicine Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2025, Page 282, https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf007
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close