-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Corrigendum, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, Volume 18, Issue 4, Winter 2011, Pages 598–599, https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr023
- Share Icon Share
The Editors apologize for the following errors in Social Politics, Volume 18, Number 2:
Sentenced repeated on pp. 152 and 153. Delete sentence on p. 152: By focusing on agency inequalities, we highlight the need for more dynamic models in comparative welfare state research that reflect process-oriented analyses rather than the more conventional analysis of outcomes in welfare regimes, such as income inequalities, or comparative studies of public expenditures.
p. 186: for her husband who was not told not to come to work, read her husband who was told not to come to work.
p. 193: for conversion facts, read conversion factors.
p. 204: for she can not perform a responsible function, read she cannot function as a responsible manager.
p. 207: for often perceived as more reliable working force, read often perceived as a more reliable workforce.
p. 212: for people had expected secure, read people had expected secure futures.
p. 221: for these tensions that experienced, read these tensions that are experienced.
p. 307: for this has been seen in the heightened, read this has been heightened.
p. 322: for in extent of national legislation, read in extending national legislation.
p. 325: for views of the BIC managers, read views of the managers.