Table 3.

No‐observed‐effect concentrations (NOECs), lowest‐observed‐effect concentrations (LOECs), and median effect/lethal concentration (EC50/LC50) estimates for freshwater primary producers exposed to thiamethoxama

OrganismTest typeStudy IDEndpointNOEC (mg/L)LOEC (mg/L)ECxx (mg/L)
Raphidocelis subcapitata72 h (static)1Biomass (b) and growth rate (r)NOECr/NOECb: 81.8b>81.8EC50r/b: >81.8
96 h (static)2Biomass (b) and growth rate (r)NOECr/NOECb: 100b>100EC50r/b: > 100
Anabaena flos‐aquae96 h (static)3Avg. specific growth rate (r); biomass (area under growth curve) (b); yield (y)72‐h NOECr,b,y: 97b 96‐h NOECr,b,y: 4772‐h LOECr,b,y: >97 96‐h LOECr,b,y: 9772‐h EC10b: 51 (ne – 61) 72‐h EC20b: 62 (ne – 74) 72‐h EC10y: 53 (ne − 64) 72‐h EC20y: 64 (ne − 87) 72‐h EC10yr: 88 (32 − ne) 72‐h EC20yr: >97 72‐ and 96‐h EC50 r/b/y: > 97
Navicula pelliculosa96 h (static)4Avg. specific growth rate (r); biomass (area under growth curve) (b); yield (y)72‐h NOECr,b,y 98b 96‐h NOECr,b,y: 98b72‐h LOECr,b,y: >98 96‐h LOECr,b,y: >9872‐h EC10b: 66 (16 – ne) 72‐h EC20,50b: >98 72‐h EC10,20,50r/y: >98 96‐h EC50r/b/y: >98
Lemna gibba7 d (semistatic)5Inhibition of frond number (growth rate (r) and biomass (b) as area under the growth curve); frond dry weightFrond number NOECr,b,y: 90.2bWeight NOEC: 90.2b>90.2Frond number EC50r/b: >90.2
OrganismTest typeStudy IDEndpointNOEC (mg/L)LOEC (mg/L)ECxx (mg/L)
Raphidocelis subcapitata72 h (static)1Biomass (b) and growth rate (r)NOECr/NOECb: 81.8b>81.8EC50r/b: >81.8
96 h (static)2Biomass (b) and growth rate (r)NOECr/NOECb: 100b>100EC50r/b: > 100
Anabaena flos‐aquae96 h (static)3Avg. specific growth rate (r); biomass (area under growth curve) (b); yield (y)72‐h NOECr,b,y: 97b 96‐h NOECr,b,y: 4772‐h LOECr,b,y: >97 96‐h LOECr,b,y: 9772‐h EC10b: 51 (ne – 61) 72‐h EC20b: 62 (ne – 74) 72‐h EC10y: 53 (ne − 64) 72‐h EC20y: 64 (ne − 87) 72‐h EC10yr: 88 (32 − ne) 72‐h EC20yr: >97 72‐ and 96‐h EC50 r/b/y: > 97
Navicula pelliculosa96 h (static)4Avg. specific growth rate (r); biomass (area under growth curve) (b); yield (y)72‐h NOECr,b,y 98b 96‐h NOECr,b,y: 98b72‐h LOECr,b,y: >98 96‐h LOECr,b,y: >9872‐h EC10b: 66 (16 – ne) 72‐h EC20,50b: >98 72‐h EC10,20,50r/y: >98 96‐h EC50r/b/y: >98
Lemna gibba7 d (semistatic)5Inhibition of frond number (growth rate (r) and biomass (b) as area under the growth curve); frond dry weightFrond number NOECr,b,y: 90.2bWeight NOEC: 90.2b>90.2Frond number EC50r/b: >90.2
a

Species, test durations, and endpoints as indicated.

b

Greatest tested concentration.

ne = not estimable.

Table 3.

No‐observed‐effect concentrations (NOECs), lowest‐observed‐effect concentrations (LOECs), and median effect/lethal concentration (EC50/LC50) estimates for freshwater primary producers exposed to thiamethoxama

OrganismTest typeStudy IDEndpointNOEC (mg/L)LOEC (mg/L)ECxx (mg/L)
Raphidocelis subcapitata72 h (static)1Biomass (b) and growth rate (r)NOECr/NOECb: 81.8b>81.8EC50r/b: >81.8
96 h (static)2Biomass (b) and growth rate (r)NOECr/NOECb: 100b>100EC50r/b: > 100
Anabaena flos‐aquae96 h (static)3Avg. specific growth rate (r); biomass (area under growth curve) (b); yield (y)72‐h NOECr,b,y: 97b 96‐h NOECr,b,y: 4772‐h LOECr,b,y: >97 96‐h LOECr,b,y: 9772‐h EC10b: 51 (ne – 61) 72‐h EC20b: 62 (ne – 74) 72‐h EC10y: 53 (ne − 64) 72‐h EC20y: 64 (ne − 87) 72‐h EC10yr: 88 (32 − ne) 72‐h EC20yr: >97 72‐ and 96‐h EC50 r/b/y: > 97
Navicula pelliculosa96 h (static)4Avg. specific growth rate (r); biomass (area under growth curve) (b); yield (y)72‐h NOECr,b,y 98b 96‐h NOECr,b,y: 98b72‐h LOECr,b,y: >98 96‐h LOECr,b,y: >9872‐h EC10b: 66 (16 – ne) 72‐h EC20,50b: >98 72‐h EC10,20,50r/y: >98 96‐h EC50r/b/y: >98
Lemna gibba7 d (semistatic)5Inhibition of frond number (growth rate (r) and biomass (b) as area under the growth curve); frond dry weightFrond number NOECr,b,y: 90.2bWeight NOEC: 90.2b>90.2Frond number EC50r/b: >90.2
OrganismTest typeStudy IDEndpointNOEC (mg/L)LOEC (mg/L)ECxx (mg/L)
Raphidocelis subcapitata72 h (static)1Biomass (b) and growth rate (r)NOECr/NOECb: 81.8b>81.8EC50r/b: >81.8
96 h (static)2Biomass (b) and growth rate (r)NOECr/NOECb: 100b>100EC50r/b: > 100
Anabaena flos‐aquae96 h (static)3Avg. specific growth rate (r); biomass (area under growth curve) (b); yield (y)72‐h NOECr,b,y: 97b 96‐h NOECr,b,y: 4772‐h LOECr,b,y: >97 96‐h LOECr,b,y: 9772‐h EC10b: 51 (ne – 61) 72‐h EC20b: 62 (ne – 74) 72‐h EC10y: 53 (ne − 64) 72‐h EC20y: 64 (ne − 87) 72‐h EC10yr: 88 (32 − ne) 72‐h EC20yr: >97 72‐ and 96‐h EC50 r/b/y: > 97
Navicula pelliculosa96 h (static)4Avg. specific growth rate (r); biomass (area under growth curve) (b); yield (y)72‐h NOECr,b,y 98b 96‐h NOECr,b,y: 98b72‐h LOECr,b,y: >98 96‐h LOECr,b,y: >9872‐h EC10b: 66 (16 – ne) 72‐h EC20,50b: >98 72‐h EC10,20,50r/y: >98 96‐h EC50r/b/y: >98
Lemna gibba7 d (semistatic)5Inhibition of frond number (growth rate (r) and biomass (b) as area under the growth curve); frond dry weightFrond number NOECr,b,y: 90.2bWeight NOEC: 90.2b>90.2Frond number EC50r/b: >90.2
a

Species, test durations, and endpoints as indicated.

b

Greatest tested concentration.

ne = not estimable.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close