We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website.By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Find out more Skip to Main Content
Fig. 2.
(A) Performance comparison of two alignment programs integrated in Oqtans, evaluated on the data from the use case in terms of intron accuracy (see Supplementary Fig. S3 for details). Such comparative evaluations are made easy, since the replicability assertion of the Galaxy Oqtans setup ensures otherwise identical comparisons. (B) Performance comparison from Görnitz et al. (2011), where PALMapper and TopHat alignments are processed with the de novo transcript inference tools mTIM and Cufflinks, again demonstrating the value of Oqtans for comparisons of analysis tool

(A) Performance comparison of two alignment programs integrated in Oqtans, evaluated on the data from the use case in terms of intron accuracy (see Supplementary Fig. S3 for details). Such comparative evaluations are made easy, since the replicability assertion of the Galaxy Oqtans setup ensures otherwise identical comparisons. (B) Performance comparison from Görnitz et al. (2011), where PALMapper and TopHat alignments are processed with the de novo transcript inference tools mTIM and Cufflinks, again demonstrating the value of Oqtans for comparisons of analysis tool

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close